| Revision as of 08:02, 22 November 2007 view sourceVidemus Omnia (talk | contribs)30,499 edits →Scrutinizing: request clarification← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:13, 30 April 2024 view source Jlwoodwa (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers83,390 edits +pp | ||
| (322 intermediate revisions by 88 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{pp|small=y}} | |||
| <!-- Please place new comments at the bottom of the page. --> | |||
| {{ |
{{retired}} | ||
| {{User US-Military-maybe-not-here}} | |||
| <div class="usermessage"><div style="text-align:center;" class="plainlinks">If you leave me a message on this page, I will reply on this page.<br>If I left a message on your talk page, please reply there; I'll watch your page and reply when able.</div></div> | |||
| {{message|User:Videmus Omnia}} | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="background: LightBlue;" | |||
| |- | |||
| |This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''7''' days are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived. | |||
| |- | |||
| |}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-7 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Videmus Omnia/Archive/{{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |||
| {| class="infobox" width="315px" | |||
| |- | |||
| ! align="center" | ]<br />] | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| |}<!--Template:Archivebox--> | |||
| ==Proposed deletion of Brad Baldwin== | |||
| == Possibly Unfree Image - Lovemakers == | |||
| ] | |||
| A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process  because of the following concern: | |||
| :<b>Fails WP:PORNBIO as recently made more rigorous, no other indication of notability</b> | |||
| All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. | |||
| I had checked on an image you had tagged for copyright violation (]). I put my full response on the IFD page, but I was wondering if there was any procedure to go through about contacting possible copyright holders to double check the photo's status. - ] (]) 07:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 20:56, 8 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ilanijanovic.wg.am spam == | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi - spotted the Meta req. I still think this might be sorted at a local level. You've done a final warning for the user - if they place again feel free to nudge me and we'll try a block first maybe? Cheers --] <b><sup><small><span style="color:#90F">]</span></small></sup></b> 08:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 09:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Copyright problems== | |||
| Hello. Concerning your contribution, ], we cannot accept ] text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. {{#if: {{{2|{{{url|}}}}}} | This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{2|{{{url}}}}}}.}} As a copyright violation, ] appears to qualify for ] under the ]. ] has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible. | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the ''] (GFDL)'' then you should do one of the following: | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason: | |||
| {{center|'''''This image is abusive, not neutral, and not educational.'''''}} | |||
| :*If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at ] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". '''See ] for instructions.''' | |||
| {{Quote box | |||
| :*If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted ''under the ] or released into the public domain'' leave a note at ] with a link to where we can find that note. | |||
| | quote = You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the ]. | |||
| :*If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org ''or'' a postal message to the permitting re-use ''under the ]'', and note that you have done so on ]. | |||
| | source = Thank you. | |||
| | width = 20% | |||
| | align = right | |||
| }} | |||
| Under the ], articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please ], and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> on the top of the page and leave a note on ] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. | |||
| For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria ], ], ], or ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn-reason --> ] (]) 08:05, 5 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == a loss == | |||
| ==''Signpost'' updated for November 19th, 2007.== | |||
| I have you to ]. — ''']''' <sup>|''' ]'''</sup> | 07:25, 11 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| ! ]<font style="position: relative; top: .3em; font-size: 250%;">'''Weekly Delivery'''</font> | |||
| |} | |||
| <br> | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=3 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | align="left" | '''Volume 3, Issue 47''' || align ="center" | '''] ]''' || align="right" | ''']''' | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=3 align=center | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |} | |||
| {| align="center" cellspacing="20" width=90% style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | width=50% | ] | |||
| | width=50% | | |||
| |} | |||
| == ] nomination of ] == | |||
| {| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| ]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]"). | |||
| | colspan=2 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | align="left" | ''']''' | ] | ] | ] | ] | |||
| | align = "right" | <small>] : ]</small> | |||
| |- | |||
| | colspan=2 | | |||
| ---- | |||
| |} | |||
| Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
| <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] (]) 10:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)</small> | |||
| You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. | |||
| ==24.19.33.82== | |||
| Please don't do this. I am trying very hard to broker a deal here. It isn't easy and every side has been having a go at me. Your involvement is highly counterproductive. Step away and let the IP speak for itself. This isn't the sort of block that can just be overturned by another admin - consensus is needed. <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 23:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Are you saying the block was righteous? ] ] 23:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I don't think the account was Mywikibiz - the "meatpuppet" claim is more complex. However the account has done things since that block that I would support a block for. The problem from the fact that it was a response to perceived unfair treatment. As with all these scenarios the ideal scenario is for these parties to avoid each other. That won't be possible unless either Durova/Jehochman know what the user's account is or then 3 of them are able to agree a number of people who will know the name of the account and agree to enforce the deal. The situation is far from ideal for either side but seems better than the alternative. Lets wait for a response from 24.19.33.82 - find out what is and isn't acceptable to that person. <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 23:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::What exactly are Durova and Jehochman worried is going to happen? This seems to me to be a disingenuous attempt to force the person to reveal information they already stated that they don't want to. If Durova/Jehochman don't know who it is, then it's pretty unlikely they're not going to run into some random user among thousands. And if they happen to by accident, it's not like the anon can complain about it anyway. Let the person have their privacy, they've been hassled enough. ] ] 23:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::That is certainly a point they can make - I have laid out a possible proposals. I want them to respond to it and say what is or isn't acceptable to them. If they or one of the others reject the agreement we are back at square one, which is . I very much doubt any admin will unblock in the midst of an ArbCom case without the consent of everyone. May way really is best - the proposal laid out isn't final, its just something to get the ball rolling. <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 23:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Since nobody is blameless here, but the whole situation was precipitated by an admin screwup, I think the best solution would simply be to go back to ''status quo ante'', with the IP unblocked and the other involved parties just going their separate ways without sanction. But it's wrong to punish the IP for editing with open proxies (after being provoked), and for the blocking admins not to be held accountable also. There's no reason that ArbCom can't continue their investigation with the IP unblocked, and if the IP screws up and is blocked for something else, that simplifies the investigation, doesn't it? ] ] 23:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::We cannot say "its OK to edit with open proxies" if provoked. And sending a series of harassing emails to the blocking admin is also not acceptable. If the IP were unblocked for not being a Mywikibiz sock it would undoubtedly be blocked for the latter offences. Better to come to a position where everyone agrees to the unblock. Please I'm trying to coordinate this with a number of involved parties and to keep ArbCom up to date. Having to juggle your questions isn't helping. If at the end of it you are disatisfied with the conclusion, make your protests then. <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 23:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Your Recent Comments on AN/I == | |||
| == File:Demi_Delia_1.JPG listed for deletion == | |||
| Hi! Apologies in advance, I hope this isn't inappropriate, but I found the ] most illuminating: | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 21:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Images lacking a description== | |||
| :You know as well as I do that referring an anon editor to the ArbCom for a block review is just a roundabout way of telling them to 'get bent' if the block was done by a longtime editor like Durova. | |||
| ''']''', which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 20:20, 23 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Would you be willing to reiterate this point at the ]? I think it's important, because this seems to be the thrust of developing "consensus", and what you've said seems plausible, though I'm too ignorant to be sure. If you'd rather not, or have changed your assessment, I completely understand, and thank you for your time. ] | ] 23:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| :Hmm, I can't really back it up with any evidence, it's just common wisdom I've picked up by observation here. Also, I've been the victim of idiotic and wrong blocks myself, and the first time especially I had a hell of a time getting unblocked just because I was new. I got treated like shit, but I was persistent enough that I finally got unblocked. That's why I have a pretty low tolerance for high-handed admins. ] ] 23:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| ::Thank you for answering (and so quickly, too!). Lack of evidence seems to be the latest meme (ie the underlying issue, no disrespect). Sadly, I understand your quandary, which (IMO) doesn't bode well for a meaningful resolution. I wish I was surprised. Thanks again, and while I generally frown on intolerance (a necessary irony), in your case I approve. ] | ] 00:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ==Thank You== | |||
| Thank you for your service to our country. - ] <sup>]</sup> 05:03, 21 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] 15:18, 26 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Request For Comment/Durova == | |||
| {{User QAIbox | |||
| Please just do it already. | |||
| | title = Awesome | |||
| | image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| While I have little faith it will be anything but a re-hashing of the petty squabbling already seen, at least it will be a ''contained'' squabbling. | |||
| | image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| | bold = ] | |||
| ] (]) 06:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| :I'm thinking about it but have little hope the work would accomplish anything. I actually voted to delete RfC/User conduct not long ago because it's so useless. If Durova had honor she would answer the recall request, but apparently that's not the case, sadly. ] ] 06:53, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| --] (]) 08:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::(ec) Well, "honour" is a pretty harsh word here... It's easy to say something, forget you said it, say something else, change your mind, etc. There are two versions of "recall" she's proposed, I'm suggesting you take the second. <br/>] (]) 06:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Template:Porn Star == | |||
| === Scrutinizing === | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 15:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
| O-kaay... Please feel free to utterly ignore this advice, but having had a little hop around your last few contributions, and in particular ''the response'' to those contributions, I have some concerns for your "wiki-safety" for lack of a better word. | |||
| == Nomination for merging of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 11:19, 22 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Just that I know from rude experiance that it can be terribly easy to get blocked for asking straight-forward questions. I'd like you to consider, ahead of time, how you'll respond if that happens. If it does, please be as utterly squeaky-clean as it is humanly possible to be. doubleplusgood behavior will be utterly required of you, lest the death-spiral commence. | |||
| ] (]) 06:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. Yes, I've been targeted by unjust blocks before, also. ] ] 07:03, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::What a depressingly apt summation of the entire problem. ] | ] 07:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::"''I've been targeted by unjust blocks before..''" explains you issue with Ryulong <sup></sup>. However a word of caution is advised, those blocks were "reportedly" a result of harasment of at least 3 editors. I'm not arguing the validity of events last June and July, I am concerned about the 6 admins recently you have chosen to direct scrutiny towards. This may become a very serious matter per ]. This sort of behavior is blockable on its own especially if the blocking Administrator believes the behavior was for the purposes of harassment. Just step lighty and don't chose, in pursuit of a certain point, to reject input that your edits may be percieved as harassing. You've made great contributions, please chose the right path. I may dissagree with some of your edits, however, I don't want to see you blocked--] (]) 07:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I'm not impressed by your warning, Hu12. Look into those so-called "harassment" accusations from Ryulong's earlier block before talking about it, because he bought an RfC shortly after that. However, I would sincerely welcome your input on how any of my recent questions of admin conduct are not valid ones - particularly Ryulong's blocks. And please, explain to me the part of ] I am violating, I can't wait to hear it. ] ] 07:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Oh, and see . ] ] 07:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Listen, I'm not arguing the validity of events last June and July. However reasonable Wikipedians may conclude that your recent pursuits are harassment. You don't need to be impressed, just heed the warning. --] (]) 08:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Please give me some clue how my recent edits are a violation of ]. ] ] 08:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:13, 30 April 2024
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.
Proposed deletion of Brad Baldwin
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brad Baldwin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:PORNBIO as recently made more rigorous, no other indication of notability
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:56, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Nikita Devine
I have nominated Nikita Devine, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nikita Devine. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Epbr123 (talk) 09:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Michele Merkin 1.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Michele Merkin 1.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason:
This image is abusive, not neutral, and not educational.Thank you.You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on ] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Q0k (talk) 08:05, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
a loss
I have added you to Misplaced Pages:Missing Wikipedians. — pd_THOR | 07:25, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Keeani Lei
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Keeani Lei. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Keeani Lei. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Demi_Delia_1.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Demi_Delia_1.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bazonka (talk) 21:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Images lacking a description
Category:Images lacking a description, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 20:20, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Talk:Patrick Sherrill for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talk:Patrick Sherrill is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Talk:Patrick Sherrill until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TucsonDavidU.S.A. 15:18, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Porn Star
Template:Porn Star has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. JudeccaXIII (talk) 15:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Add-desc-S
Template:Add-desc-S has been nominated for merging with Template:Add-desc-I. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 11:19, 22 October 2020 (UTC)