Revision as of 15:01, 22 December 2007 edit38.100.43.50 (talk) Please stop vandalizing. You are adding unsubstatiated, unsourced labels. Look up neoconservative in the dictionary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:35, 8 June 2024 edit undo2600:8803:7c89:3d00:3c6f:ba28:5ed0:162 (talk)No edit summary | ||
(269 intermediate revisions by 98 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox |
{{Infobox organization | ||
| |
|name = Campus Watch | ||
|logo = | |||
| organization_logo = | |||
|motto = | |||
| organization_motto = | |||
|type = | |||
| organization_type = ] | |||
| |
|founded = 2002 by ] | ||
| |
|location = ], Pennsylvania, USA | ||
| |
|key_people = ], Director | ||
|homepage = | |||
| fields = | |||
| services = | |||
| num_members = | |||
| homepage = | |||
}} | }} | ||
'''Campus Watch''' is a project of the ], |
'''Campus Watch''' is a web-based project of the ], a ] with its headquarters in ], Pennsylvania. According to its website, Campus Watch "reviews and critiques ] in ] with an aim to improving them."<ref name=aboutCW> | ||
Accessed 2010-12-20.</ref> Critics of Campus Watch say that it is a pro-] lobbyist organization involved in harassing, blacklisting, or intimidating scholars critical of Israel.<ref name=NYROB2007> | |||
{{cite magazine | |||
|url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19145 | |||
|title=Campus Watch |magazine=] |date=July 13, 2006}} | |||
</ref><ref name=TN021111> | |||
{{cite magazine | |||
|url=http://www.thenation.com/doc/20021125/mcneil/2 | |||
|title=The War on Academic Freedom | |||
|first=Kristine |last=McNeil |magazine=] |date=November 11, 2002}} | |||
</ref><ref>John J. Mearsheimer, Stephen M. Walt. ''The Israel lobby and U.S. foreign policy,'' 2007, page 179</ref> | |||
Campus Watch was launched in 2002 by Middle East Forum director ]. It is headed by ].<ref name=DP070919>{{cite news |last=Pipes |first=Daniel |authorlink=Daniel Pipes |url=http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1189411441668&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull |title=Five Years of Campus Watch |newspaper=The Jerusalem Post |date=September 19, 2007 }}{{Dead link|date=November 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> | |||
According to Campus Watch, the organization "reviews and critiques Middle East studies in North America with an aim to improving them." The organization further states, "it fully respects the freedom of speech of those it debates while insisting on its own freedom to comment on their words and deeds."<ref>. Retrieved on ].</ref> | |||
== Dossiers == | |||
Daniel Pipes, the founder of Campus Watch, explained he believes Campus Watch critiquing professors is important because in his opinion, "Students suppress their views to protect their careers; peers are reluctant to criticize each other, lest they in turn suffer attacks; and laymen lack the competence to judge arcane scholarship."<ref>Pipes, Daniel. "" '']'' (]). Retrieved on ].</ref> | |||
Campus Watch encourages students to submit reports about college professors.<ref name=NYROB2007 /> In 2002, Campus Watch created a controversy when it compiled these reports into 'dossiers' critical of various professors at institutes of higher learning in the United States, in which it detailed their supposedly "anti-Israeli statements".<ref> Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.</ref> In response to the posting of the dossiers on its website, many individuals sent harassing emails and phone calls to the profiled professors, and the website was widely condemned in the media for supposedly engaging in "]" intimidation.<ref name=SFC020908> | |||
{{cite news |first=Tanya |last=Schevitz | |||
|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/09/28/MN227890.DTL | |||
|title=Professors Want Own Names Put on Mideast Blacklist | |||
|newspaper=] |date=September 8, 2002}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |last=Strindberg |first=Anders |title=The New Commissars: Congress threatens to cut off funding to collegiate Mideast Studies departments that refuse to toe the neocon line |url=http://www.amconmag.com/2004_02_02/article.html |magazine=] |date=February 2, 2004 |accessdate=2008-03-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080307054222/http://www.amconmag.com/2004_02_02/article.html |archive-date=March 7, 2008 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name=NYT020927> | |||
{{cite news |first=Tamar |last=Lewin | |||
|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/27/us/web-site-fuels-debate-on-campus-anti-semitism.html | |||
|title=Web Site Fuels Debate on Campus Anti-Semitism | |||
|newspaper=] |date=September 27, 2002}}</ref> The Campus Watch project was derided as a "War on Academic Freedom";<ref name=TN021111 /> in protest, more than 100 academics asked to be listed along with those accused by Campus Watch.<ref name=SFC020908/><ref name=Beinin2003>{{cite journal | |||
| author = Beinin, J. | |||
| year = 2003 | |||
| title = The Israelization of American Middle East Policy Discourse | |||
| journal = ] | |||
| volume = 21 | |||
| issue = 2\_ 75 | |||
| pages = 125–140 | |||
| url = http://socialtext.dukejournals.org/cgi/reprint/21/2_75/125.pdf | |||
| accessdate = 2008-04-02 | |||
| doi = 10.1215/01642472-21-2_75-125 | |||
| s2cid = 143772997 | |||
== History == | |||
}}</ref> The response of ], a comparative literature professor at ], was circulated on the Internet: | |||
:I have recently learned that your organization is compiling dossiers on professors at U.S. academic institutions who oppose the Israeli occupation and its brutality, actively support Palestinian rights of ] as well as a more informed and intelligent view of Islam than is currently represented in the U.S. media. I would be enormously honored to be counted among those who actively hold these positions and would like to be included in the list of those who are struggling for justice.<ref name=NYT020927 /> | |||
In 2002, the Middle East Forum initiated Campus Watch and identified what they believe to be five problems in the teaching of Middle Eastern studies at American universities, "analytical failures, the mixing of politics with scholarship, intolerance of alternative views, ], and the abuse of power over students."<ref>Qtd. from "Mission Statement" in "". Campus Watch. Retrieved on ].</ref> | |||
], a professor at ] who was the subject of a critical dossier on the website, suggested that the Campus Watch campaign was an attempt to silence legitimate criticism, "by tarring it with the brush of ] and ], truly loathsome charges."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.adc.org/index.php?id=1142 |title=ADC Denounces New Efforts to Chill Academic Freedom |work=Press Release |publisher=] |date=September 26, 2002 |accessdate=2008-03-09}}</ref> Khalidi taped an anonymous phone call he received, subsequent to the Campus Watch dossier publication, that says: "Khalidi, Columbia alumni love Campus Watch because they keep an eye on thugs like you. We have our eye on you. You'd better watch out."<ref>{{cite magazine | |||
Initially, Campus Watch encouraged students to submit reports regarding teachers, books, and curricula, which led some professors to accuse Campus Watch of "]" intimidation; in protest, more than 100 other academics asked to be listed.<ref name=Schevitz>Tanya Schevitz. "". '']'' (]). Retrieved on ].</ref> Subsequently, Campus Watch removed the list from its website.<ref name=Schevitz2> Tanya Schevitz. "". '']'' (]) Retrieved on ].</ref><ref name=Ayloush>Hussam, Ayloush. "". '']'' (]). Retrieved on ].</ref> | |||
|url=http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=193711§ioncode=26 | |||
|title=We have our eye on you...so watch out | |||
|first=Michael |last=North | |||
|date=28 January 2005 |magazine=]}}</ref> | |||
After two weeks, Campus Watch removed the dossiers from its website.<ref> | |||
{{cite news |first=Tanya |last=Schevitz |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/10/03/MN54056.DTL |title='Dossiers' Dropped from Web Blacklist |newspaper=] |date=October 3, 2002 |accessdate=2008-03-09}}</ref> | |||
It continues to collect information from students,<ref name=NYROB2007/> though it no longer publishes such dossiers.<ref name=MyersC27> | |||
{{cite web | |||
|title=Setting The Record Straight: Response to Hassan Nafaa | |||
|url=http://www.campus-watch.org/correction/27 | |||
|first=Winfield |last=Myers |authorlink=Winfield Myers}}</ref> According to ], one of the professors who was subject to Campus Watch's dossiers, the website continued to spread false information about him even after the dossiers were removed: "The removal of the individual dossiers is merely a cosmetic change, since the same academics are still being spied on, only under the rubric of spying on their campuses instead."<ref>"Pro-Israel Web Site Removes 'Dossiers' It Was Keeping on Professors". ''Chronicle of Higher Education'' October 1, 2002</ref> | |||
== Criticism == | == Criticism == | ||
An article in '']'' suggests that Daniel Pipes is "an anti-Arab propagandist", and his Campus Watch project aims to "smear" academics critical of the ] or of ].<ref name=TN021111/> Campus Watch's project was identified, in ''The Nation'' and elsewhere,<ref>Stephen M. E. Marmura. ''Hegemony in the digital age: the Arab/Israeli conflict online''. Lexington Books, 2008, {{ISBN|978-0-7391-1772-9}}. Page 33</ref> as resembling a decades-old AIPAC project: | |||
:In 1979 the ] (AIPAC) formed its Political Leadership Development Program, which "educates and trains young leaders in pro-Israel political advocacy," enlisting hundreds of college students to collect information on pro-Palestinian professors and student organizations. By 1983 the program had attracted more than 5,000 students on 350 campuses in all fifty states. The next year the findings were published as The AIPAC College Guide: Exposing the Anti-Israel Campaign on Campus, which surveyed 100 campuses and instructed students on how best to counter a "steady diet of anti-Israel vituperation." Around the same time, the Anti-Defamation League covertly distributed a twenty-one-page booklet containing "background information on pro-Arab sympathizers active on college campuses" who "use their anti-Zionism as merely a guise for their deeply felt anti-Semitism." | |||
], who has often been criticized by Campus Watch, has accused Daniel Pipes of being "beholden to Israeli right wing politics."<ref name=bein> | |||
Opponents of Campus Watch describe it as an attempt to stifle any criticism of Israel in American academia.<ref name=McNeil/><ref>Green, David. "". '']'' (]). Retrieved on ].</ref><ref>Roy, Sara. "". '']'' (]). Retrieved on ].</ref><ref>Strindberg, Anders. "". '']'' (]). Retrieved on ].</ref>. ], a Director of the Middle East Institute at ] and a target of Campus Watch, stated "This noxious campaign is intended to silence such perfectly legitimate criticism, by tarring it with the brush of anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism, truly loathsome charges. They reveal the lengths that these people apparently feel impelled to go to in order to silence a true debate on campus."<ref>"" (Press Release). ] (]). Retrieved on ].</ref> | |||
{{cite web | |||
|url=http://hnn.us/articles/1001.html | |||
|title=Who's Watching the Watchers? | |||
|first=Joel |last=Beinin |authorlink=Joel Beinin | |||
|publisher=] |date=September 30, 2002}}</ref> | |||
According to Beinin, "After failing in his own pursuit of an academic career, Pipes has evidently decided to take revenge on the scholarly community that rejected him", in the form of the Campus Watch website.<ref name=bein /> Pipes strongly denied Beinin's charges, writing that he was "offered a tenure-track position and turned it down, preferring to write than teach".<ref name=PipesPiping> | |||
Accessed December 20, 2010.</ref> while simultaneously attacking Beinin "of credentialitis, the disease that places more emphasis on qualifications than achievements"<ref name=PipesPiping/> and the fact that "Harvard's doctoral program in history turned him down but awarded me a Ph.D.."<ref name=PipesPiping/> Beinin has also alleged that Campus Watch "makes comments" about the ethnic and cultural background of scholars.<ref> Salaita, Steven, "Curricular Activism and Academic Freedom," ''Arab Studies Quarterly,'' 2008, reprinted in britannica.com.] Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.</ref> | |||
In their book '']'', ] and ] wrote that | |||
], then Professor of Middle East History at ], now Director of the Middle East Studies Department at the ], said:<ref></ref> "Campus Watch compiles dossiers on professors and universities that do not meet its standard of uncritical support for the policies of George Bush and Ariel Sharon. Among other things, this may be Pipes' way of taking revenge on the scholarly community after failing in his own pursuit of an academic career in Middle East studies.." | |||
:The Lobby also monitors what professors write and teach. In September 2002, for example, Martin Kramer and Daniel Pipes, two passionately pro-Israel neoconservatives, established a website (Campus Watch) that posted dossiers on suspect academics and encouraged students to report remarks or behavior that might be considered hostile to Israel. This transparent attempt to blacklist and intimidate scholars prompted a harsh reaction, and Pipes and Kramer later removed the dossiers, but the website still invites students to report "anti-Israel" activity.<ref name=M-W-2006>{{cite journal |author=Mearsheimer, John J. |authorlink=John Mearsheimer |author2=Walt, Stephen M. |authorlink2=Stephen Walt |title=The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy |url=http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/RWP06-011/$File/rwp_06_011_walt.pdf |date=March 13, 2006 |accessdate=2008-03-09 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080308211346/http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/RWP06-011/%24File/rwp_06_011_walt.pdf |archivedate=March 8, 2008 }} See also '']''.</ref> | |||
Pipes responded to part of the Mearsheimer and Walt allegations, writing | |||
:This account is inaccurate in several ways (e.g. Martin Kramer had no role in founding Campus Watch), but I write specifically to state that no 'Lobby' told me to start Campus Watch. Neither the Middle East Forum nor myself has ever taken orders from some mythical 'Lobby', and specifically I decided to establish Campus Watch on my own, without direction from any outside source. I challenge Mearsheimer and Walt to provide their information that connects this 'Lobby' to my decision to establish Campus Watch.<ref name=Pipes060512> | |||
{{cite web |first=Daniel |last=Pipes |authorlink=Daniel Pipes | |||
|url=http://www.danielpipes.org/3581/is-campus-watch-part-of-a-conspiracy-on-mearsheimer-walt | |||
|title=Is Campus Watch Part of a Conspiracy? (On Mearsheimer-Walt and The "Israeli Lobby") | |||
|date=May 12, 2006}} | |||
Originally published in ].</ref> | |||
Later he wrote that "Mearsheimer and Walt unconditionally concede they have no information about the alleged “lobby” giving me orders concerning Campus Watch, confirming the falsehood of their initial claim"<ref name=Pipes060512/> and furthermore added | |||
:Campus Watch is to Middle East studies as political analysis to politics, film criticism to movies, and consumer reports to manufacturing; we provide assessments for the public. Unlike politicians, actors, and business executives, who accept criticism with good grace, academics howl with umbrage at being judged.<ref name=Pipes060512/> | |||
=== Response === | |||
In March 2006, political scientists ] and ] wrote in '']'', that Campus Watch was founded by "two passionately pro-Israel ]" with the intention of "encourag students to report comments or behavior that might be considered hostile to Israel" and that it was a "transparent attempt to blacklist and intimidate scholars."<ref>]; ] (August 27, 2007). '']''. ]. ISBN 0374177724. | |||
According to Campus Watch, it "critiques Middle East studies in North America regardless of whether they address Israel."<ref name=MyersC27/> In response to what it refers to as "a campaign of vilification and distortion" by critics, Campus Watch states: | |||
</ref> In response to a breif version of ''The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy'' published in '']'', Daniel Pipes, the founder of Campus Watch, stated, "This account is inaccurate in several ways," referring to ]'s involvement in Campus Watch and references to the ]'s influence on Campus Watch.<ref>Pipes, Daniel. "". '']'' (])</ref> | |||
:* Campus Watch supports the unencumbered freedom of speech of all scholars, regardless of their views. | |||
:* Campus Watch takes no position on individual academic appointments. | |||
== See also == | |||
:* Academic freedom does not mean freedom from criticism; to the contrary, no one enjoys privileges in the free marketplace of ideas. | |||
:* The charge of "McCarthyism" has come up so often that we address this in a separate study which demonstrates why the charge is ignorant, intolerant, and ultimately self-serving. | |||
*], a pro-Israel policy group | |||
:* We challenge scholars of Middle Eastern studies to abandon the crude resort to insults and engage Campus Watch on the substance of our analysis.<ref name=aboutCW /> | |||
*], a conservative think tank | |||
* ], one of the editors of Campus Watch | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | |||
==External links== | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||
* | |||
] | |||
== External links == | |||
] | |||
] | |||
* at ]. | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 03:35, 8 June 2024
Founded | 2002 by Daniel Pipes |
---|---|
Location |
|
Key people | Winfield Myers, Director |
Website | Campus-Watch.org |
Campus Watch is a web-based project of the Middle East Forum, a think tank with its headquarters in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. According to its website, Campus Watch "reviews and critiques Middle East studies in North America with an aim to improving them." Critics of Campus Watch say that it is a pro-Israel lobbyist organization involved in harassing, blacklisting, or intimidating scholars critical of Israel.
Campus Watch was launched in 2002 by Middle East Forum director Daniel Pipes. It is headed by Winfield Myers.
Dossiers
Campus Watch encourages students to submit reports about college professors. In 2002, Campus Watch created a controversy when it compiled these reports into 'dossiers' critical of various professors at institutes of higher learning in the United States, in which it detailed their supposedly "anti-Israeli statements". In response to the posting of the dossiers on its website, many individuals sent harassing emails and phone calls to the profiled professors, and the website was widely condemned in the media for supposedly engaging in "McCarthyesque" intimidation. The Campus Watch project was derided as a "War on Academic Freedom"; in protest, more than 100 academics asked to be listed along with those accused by Campus Watch. The response of Judith Butler, a comparative literature professor at Berkeley, was circulated on the Internet:
- I have recently learned that your organization is compiling dossiers on professors at U.S. academic institutions who oppose the Israeli occupation and its brutality, actively support Palestinian rights of self-determination as well as a more informed and intelligent view of Islam than is currently represented in the U.S. media. I would be enormously honored to be counted among those who actively hold these positions and would like to be included in the list of those who are struggling for justice.
Rashid Khalidi, a professor at Columbia University who was the subject of a critical dossier on the website, suggested that the Campus Watch campaign was an attempt to silence legitimate criticism, "by tarring it with the brush of anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism, truly loathsome charges." Khalidi taped an anonymous phone call he received, subsequent to the Campus Watch dossier publication, that says: "Khalidi, Columbia alumni love Campus Watch because they keep an eye on thugs like you. We have our eye on you. You'd better watch out."
After two weeks, Campus Watch removed the dossiers from its website. It continues to collect information from students, though it no longer publishes such dossiers. According to Juan Cole, one of the professors who was subject to Campus Watch's dossiers, the website continued to spread false information about him even after the dossiers were removed: "The removal of the individual dossiers is merely a cosmetic change, since the same academics are still being spied on, only under the rubric of spying on their campuses instead."
Criticism
An article in The Nation suggests that Daniel Pipes is "an anti-Arab propagandist", and his Campus Watch project aims to "smear" academics critical of the Israeli occupation or of American foreign policy. Campus Watch's project was identified, in The Nation and elsewhere, as resembling a decades-old AIPAC project:
- In 1979 the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) formed its Political Leadership Development Program, which "educates and trains young leaders in pro-Israel political advocacy," enlisting hundreds of college students to collect information on pro-Palestinian professors and student organizations. By 1983 the program had attracted more than 5,000 students on 350 campuses in all fifty states. The next year the findings were published as The AIPAC College Guide: Exposing the Anti-Israel Campaign on Campus, which surveyed 100 campuses and instructed students on how best to counter a "steady diet of anti-Israel vituperation." Around the same time, the Anti-Defamation League covertly distributed a twenty-one-page booklet containing "background information on pro-Arab sympathizers active on college campuses" who "use their anti-Zionism as merely a guise for their deeply felt anti-Semitism."
Joel Beinin, who has often been criticized by Campus Watch, has accused Daniel Pipes of being "beholden to Israeli right wing politics." According to Beinin, "After failing in his own pursuit of an academic career, Pipes has evidently decided to take revenge on the scholarly community that rejected him", in the form of the Campus Watch website. Pipes strongly denied Beinin's charges, writing that he was "offered a tenure-track position and turned it down, preferring to write than teach". while simultaneously attacking Beinin "of credentialitis, the disease that places more emphasis on qualifications than achievements" and the fact that "Harvard's doctoral program in history turned him down but awarded me a Ph.D.." Beinin has also alleged that Campus Watch "makes comments" about the ethnic and cultural background of scholars.
In their book The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt wrote that
- The Lobby also monitors what professors write and teach. In September 2002, for example, Martin Kramer and Daniel Pipes, two passionately pro-Israel neoconservatives, established a website (Campus Watch) that posted dossiers on suspect academics and encouraged students to report remarks or behavior that might be considered hostile to Israel. This transparent attempt to blacklist and intimidate scholars prompted a harsh reaction, and Pipes and Kramer later removed the dossiers, but the website still invites students to report "anti-Israel" activity.
Pipes responded to part of the Mearsheimer and Walt allegations, writing
- This account is inaccurate in several ways (e.g. Martin Kramer had no role in founding Campus Watch), but I write specifically to state that no 'Lobby' told me to start Campus Watch. Neither the Middle East Forum nor myself has ever taken orders from some mythical 'Lobby', and specifically I decided to establish Campus Watch on my own, without direction from any outside source. I challenge Mearsheimer and Walt to provide their information that connects this 'Lobby' to my decision to establish Campus Watch.
Later he wrote that "Mearsheimer and Walt unconditionally concede they have no information about the alleged “lobby” giving me orders concerning Campus Watch, confirming the falsehood of their initial claim" and furthermore added
- Campus Watch is to Middle East studies as political analysis to politics, film criticism to movies, and consumer reports to manufacturing; we provide assessments for the public. Unlike politicians, actors, and business executives, who accept criticism with good grace, academics howl with umbrage at being judged.
Response
According to Campus Watch, it "critiques Middle East studies in North America regardless of whether they address Israel." In response to what it refers to as "a campaign of vilification and distortion" by critics, Campus Watch states:
- Campus Watch supports the unencumbered freedom of speech of all scholars, regardless of their views.
- Campus Watch takes no position on individual academic appointments.
- Academic freedom does not mean freedom from criticism; to the contrary, no one enjoys privileges in the free marketplace of ideas.
- The charge of "McCarthyism" has come up so often that we address this in a separate study which demonstrates why the charge is ignorant, intolerant, and ultimately self-serving.
- We challenge scholars of Middle Eastern studies to abandon the crude resort to insults and engage Campus Watch on the substance of our analysis.
References
- ^ About Campus Watch, Campus Watch website. Accessed 2010-12-20.
- ^ "Campus Watch". New York Review of Books. July 13, 2006.
- ^ McNeil, Kristine (November 11, 2002). "The War on Academic Freedom". The Nation.
- John J. Mearsheimer, Stephen M. Walt. The Israel lobby and U.S. foreign policy, 2007, page 179
- Pipes, Daniel (September 19, 2007). "Five Years of Campus Watch". The Jerusalem Post.
- Langeland, Terje, "A Spy in the Ivory Tower," Colorado Springs Independent, Oct. 3, 2002, reprinted on alternet.org. Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.
- ^ Schevitz, Tanya (September 8, 2002). "Professors Want Own Names Put on Mideast Blacklist". San Francisco Chronicle.
- Strindberg, Anders (February 2, 2004). "The New Commissars: Congress threatens to cut off funding to collegiate Mideast Studies departments that refuse to toe the neocon line". The American Conservative. Archived from the original on March 7, 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-09.
- ^ Lewin, Tamar (September 27, 2002). "Web Site Fuels Debate on Campus Anti-Semitism". The New York Times.
- Beinin, J. (2003). "The Israelization of American Middle East Policy Discourse" (PDF). Social Text. 21 (2\_ 75): 125–140. doi:10.1215/01642472-21-2_75-125. S2CID 143772997. Retrieved 2008-04-02.
- "ADC Denounces New Efforts to Chill Academic Freedom". Press Release. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. September 26, 2002. Retrieved 2008-03-09.
- North, Michael (28 January 2005). "We have our eye on you...so watch out". Times Higher Education.
- Schevitz, Tanya (October 3, 2002). "'Dossiers' Dropped from Web Blacklist". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2008-03-09.
- ^ Myers, Winfield. "Setting The Record Straight: Response to Hassan Nafaa".
- "Pro-Israel Web Site Removes 'Dossiers' It Was Keeping on Professors". Chronicle of Higher Education October 1, 2002
- Stephen M. E. Marmura. Hegemony in the digital age: the Arab/Israeli conflict online. Lexington Books, 2008, ISBN 978-0-7391-1772-9. Page 33
- ^ Beinin, Joel (September 30, 2002). "Who's Watching the Watchers?". History News Network.
- ^ Pipes, Daniel, "Department of Corrections (of Others' Factual Mistakes about Me): Joel Beinin lies about me," danielpipes.org, October 1, 2004. Accessed December 20, 2010.
- Salaita, Steven, "Curricular Activism and Academic Freedom," Arab Studies Quarterly, 2008, reprinted in britannica.com.] Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.
- Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen M. (March 13, 2006). "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 8, 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-09.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) See also The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. - ^ Pipes, Daniel (May 12, 2006). "Is Campus Watch Part of a Conspiracy? (On Mearsheimer-Walt and The "Israeli Lobby")". Originally published in FrontPage Magazine.