Revision as of 22:41, 10 January 2008 edit131.44.121.252 (talk) →deletion objection← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 20:40, 28 December 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots8,040,635 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. (Fix Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with invalid parameters)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
(116 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{WPBiography|class=Stub|living=yes}} |
|
|
|
{{notice|If you need to contact Michael Q. Schmidt about something, please do so at ], not here.}} |
|
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|
| action1 = AFD |
|
|
| action1date = 2008-01-19 |
|
|
| action1link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Michael Q. Schmidt (actor) |
|
|
| action1result = kept |
|
|
| action1oldid = 185508117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| action2 = AFD |
|
==]== |
|
|
|
| action2date = 2008-10-19 |
|
|
| action2link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Michael Q. Schmidt (2nd nomination) |
|
|
| action2result = no consensus |
|
|
| action2oldid = 245194928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| action3 = AFD |
|
This article has been created and edited by a single group of five to six editors who currently have an open case of ] against them. Editors should review the material and remove any unsourced or POV statements in this article and/or nominate it for deletion if it does not meet the notability guidelines. Thank you. ] (]) 01:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action3date = 2009-02-18 |
|
|
| action3link = Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Michael Q. Schmidt (3rd nomination) |
|
|
| action3result = keep |
|
|
| action3oldid = 271574477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| currentstatus = |
|
|
| itndate = |
|
|
| dykdate = |
|
|
| maindate = |
|
|
| topic = television |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|blp=Yes|listas=Schmidt, Michael Q| |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-work-group=Yes|filmbio-priority=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject California|importance=Low|la=Yes|la-importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Television|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|USTV=Yes|USTV-importance=Low}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Connected contributor|MichaelQSchmidt|Schmidt, Michael Q.|editedhere=yes}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Honey And Thyme == |
|
::I counted some 29 different editors (including myself) who have made additions or deletions or changes to the article... some major.... some minor. We accused have also made improvements to ]. Why didn't that get tagged as ] as well? I request the immediate removal of the tags placed on this article by ] as it appears to be a counter-attack on improvements made by those individuals he claims are attacking him. ] (]) 08:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. But whatever H&T's story is, these articles should be notable in their own right. I believe they are not--that's just my opinion, which is not based on any affiliation to H&T (though I am a great fan of honey and of thyme, especially when coupled with a rack of lamb). Thanks again for your note, ] (]) 02:56, 15 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==striking my comments== |
|
: The "open case" of Sock puppetry is being initiated by ]. His use of that case as a reason to perform attacks on the contributions of those individuals is itself a ]. I am myself under attack by him, so my defense of any article attacked by him is as suspect as his original attack. I ask cooler heads to come forward. ] (]) 11:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hey if nobody objects would it be ok if i struck my comments on the majority of this page? they're lengthy, distracting and offtopic and i don't really care about most of the points i raised anymore. also if all that's ok, i'll wipe this section too. ] (]) 03:37, 15 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
: Further, within the narrow scope of their submissions, the edits to which he refers have all been factual, truthful, and supportive with proper references... all worthy of inclusion is Wiki. His calling any of the factual articles a ] is itself a COI. Truth and fact are never a COI. And all have maintained ], unlike his own contributions, no matter how he tries to make it seem otherwise.] (]) 12:12, 3 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:You can always strike your own comments, at any time. I'd recommend though that you leave this section as a record of your decision to do so. ] (]) 05:42, 15 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
::<small>And by "strike" I assume you mean to use the strike-through feature. ] (]) 05:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)</small> |
|
|
::*If all the other parties agree to it, we can just eliminate any of the arguments above involving (primarily) you, me, BQZip01 and MichaelQSchmidt. That way this page can serve as a functional talk page and not a monument to past disputes. ] (]) 05:47, 15 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
::*No, I mean to redact completely. ] (]) 05:47, 15 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
:::*I find this a helpful and constant reminder of my own learning processes. ''']''' '']'' 06:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Cumulus, can you copy and do a mock-up in a sandbox? My own contributions here amount to this thread. It seems to come down mostly to you, BQ and MQS. I agree that large parts of the discussion are ''not'' related to the article and would be better consigned to an archive or removed - but you would need to get their agreement, removing only your own edits just wouldn't work, since the threads are back-and-forth. Maybe though you could propose a scaled-down version that would contain only the "improving the article" bits. ] (]) 07:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
::::I have myself moved the whole kit and kaboodle to ] so I may always have a reminder of my beginnings on Wiki... the good and the bad. If an Admin can move the page's history to the ] as well, so that it will never be thought I modified any of the contents after it was stored, and if BQ is amenable, I would then be agreeable to having a neutral Admin remove such portions of the discussions as he/she deemed irrelevent to the talk page. With respects CC, it might be best if someone independent of the page does the removal, as we all have too much "history" here. ''']''' '']'' 08:00, 15 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::*OK, well, I'm in no rush, so I can wait until whenever that happens. Thanks, ] (]) 15:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
Cumulus Clouds, just archive all the old stuff, lengthy, distracting and offtopic posts included. --] (]) 09:49, 21 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Making it better == |
|
== External links modified == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
I did some editng on this page. Also on James Evans and Paris in Jail. I do not have the time to do more. I have chcked every refereence and every fact or statement. The only things I cannot find proof of are the items listed in the "Life" section. Shoud they be removed? How can I find proof that someone moved at a certain time or went to a certan school over 40 years ago? I did find the actors email address on his website. Would it be okay to write him for confirmation? How do I include this? ] (]) 22:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have just modified 5 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|
== deletion objection == |
|
|
|
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cbc.ca/thehour/blog/2007/02/lets_paint_tv.html |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080910222733/http://www.timanderic.com/images/mfb_flyer.jpg to http://www.timanderic.com/images/mfb_flyer.jpg |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090604035255/http://www.timanderic.com/live.html to http://www.timanderic.com/live.html |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090604035255/http://www.timanderic.com/live.html to http://www.timanderic.com/live.html |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090604035255/http://www.timanderic.com/live.html to http://www.timanderic.com/live.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|
"...remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to its deletion for any reason. To avoid confusion, it helps to explain why you object to the deletion, either in the edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, it should not be replaced." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|
My reason is that this is the guy who was Joy Peters in the show ]. Funny stuff. ] (]) 00:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:*I'll bet. ] (]) 01:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 02:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC) |
|
:This person (though I never heard of him) clearly has ''some'' notability. CC's rush to delete seems misplaced (don't get me wrong, it certainly has its place in Misplaced Pages), but his condescending tone is out of line even if this person was a sock. Furthermore, in a rush to tag an article with as many problems as possible, he has not seen fit to explain any of them. Accordingly, I am removing some of the tags. I will contend that Mr. Schmidt should not be the one to edit his own article, but even ] (anyone associated with Misplaced Pages debates needs to at least know a ''little'' about this guy) has been caught editing his own article and no one threw him in the ]...]. Moreover, there is no reason to throw away such information. It has been significantly pared down from what looked like a badly worded press release and seems fine now.] (]) 22:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC) (a.k.a. ]) |
|
|
|
|
|
::I also concur that ] may have been involved in this article, '''BUT''' others have been too. Have a ] on me and let's just talk about this for a little bit. ] (]) 22:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
Thanks. But whatever H&T's story is, these articles should be notable in their own right. I believe they are not--that's just my opinion, which is not based on any affiliation to H&T (though I am a great fan of honey and of thyme, especially when coupled with a rack of lamb). Thanks again for your note, Drmies (talk) 02:56, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
hey if nobody objects would it be ok if i struck my comments on the majority of this page? they're lengthy, distracting and offtopic and i don't really care about most of the points i raised anymore. also if all that's ok, i'll wipe this section too. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 03:37, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.