| Revision as of 23:42, 4 February 2008 editCWii (talk | contribs)19,938 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:44, 25 August 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)Tags: AWB Replaced | ||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| {{welcome}}--] (]) 22:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == February 2008 == | |||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Your contributions are welcomed, however, one or more of the ] you added in <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ] do not comply with our ] and have been removed. ]; nor should it be used for ] or promotion. Since Misplaced Pages uses ] tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. Please take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thanks. <!-- Template:uw-hugglespam1 --> <font style="color:Blue;">'' ''']'''<sup>(])</sup><sub>(])</sub> ''</font> 23:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| We realise nofollow is used, this is not to boost site rankings. The listed sites are already high enough. Perhaps if you'd care to actually view the links, you'd see that there is a plethora of further information related to Oddworld. | |||
| Please read ] <font style="color:Blue;">'' ''']'''<sup>(])</sup><sub>(])</sub> ''</font> 23:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| For crying out loud, we HAVE. And each time we've been referred to it, we have cited that we are well within the WP rules to link to fansites. There is NO blanket ban. And the links, bar OddChat, provide a plethora of MORE information. MORE than the Oddworld WP page could possibly dream to encompass. By removing the links, you deny the right for visitors to the Oddworld WP page access to further information. You are limiting knowledge, and therefore going against the very reason behind Misplaced Pages - building upon knowledge. The actions of the users who are removing the external links can be described as limiting and self-serving. Is it your ultimate goal to make the Oddworld WP page the final say on Oddworld? Because your actions appear that way. Furthermore, as I've already highlighted, I will be delighted to continue this volleying - we either reach an agreement on an acceptable method of displaying the rightfully valid links, or we go the way of so many other 'edit wars'. | |||
| :Perhaps this should be taken to ]. A discuss has been started there regarding the validity of the external links. (] <sup>]</sup> 23:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)) | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <font style="color:Blue;">'' ''']'''<sup>(])</sup><sub>(])</sub> ''</font> 23:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' | |||
Latest revision as of 06:44, 25 August 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.