| Revision as of 03:33, 7 April 2008 editJossi (talk | contribs)72,880 edits →Blocked for WP:NPA violations: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:45, 21 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,671,932 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <center> (1x)Tag: Fixed lint errors | ||
| (919 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Banned== | |||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to ] other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- {{NPA}} --> ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 02:45, 20 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The discussion at has determined that you are banned from Misplaced Pages. Accordingly, your account is blocked and you are not permitted to edit Misplaced Pages under any account or IP address until such time as the ban is lifted by community consensus or the Arbitration Committee. Sandstein 14:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| This user was never attacked by me. He was asked about his recent vandalism of an article and self righteously, and quite smugly uses the royal "We" to lend credence to his asinine assertion that he was personally attacked. In reviewing his edits, I see that this user has a definite point of view that he wants to push, and any future comments by this user will be archived immediately.] 19:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== ''Ichthus'': January 2012 == | ||
| <div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> | |||
| Hi, you asked for pictures of the River Tay from Balmerino. I live in Balmerino, so it shouldn't be a problem, however I am not quite sure where "Brownie's Bray" is. Is it in the Kirkton of Balmerino? If not, perhaps pointing it out in a satellite view (such as that from http://local.live.com/) would be useful!] (]) 14:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="text-align:center; border:10px solid black; background-color:black; width:100%;" | |||
| Thanks for the directions. I'll try to take them as soon as possible, if weather allows!] (]) 12:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |- padding:15em;padding-top:5em;" | |||
| |style="font-size: 350%; color:gold; "|<br>'''<big>I</big>CHTHUS''' <br><br> | |||
| |- padding:15em;padding-top:5em;" | |||
| |style="color:gold;"|'''January 2012''' | |||
| |} | |||
| <div style="background-color:#FFF; font-size: 120%;font-weight:bold;"> | |||
| ''In this issue...'' <br /> | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| </div> | |||
| ----- | |||
| <div class="center"><small>''Ichthus'' is the newsletter of Christianity on Misplaced Pages • It is published by ]<br>For submissions contact the ] • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list ]</small></div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0237 --> | |||
| :That was pretty random, now, wasn't it?] (]) 22:43, 21 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Un-Ban: Request for consideration == | |||
| == Re:Linda Gottfredson == | |||
| I would like to request that the community consider returning editing privileges to my account.] (]) 16:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I see that you were the last edit on this page. I would like to remove the disputed neutrality box. | |||
| :I'm not an admin but I'll endorse that. Whatever precipitated the ban notwithstanding, I've had nothing but positive interactions with D4D. - ] (]) 23:06, 19 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| If you have no objections that you would care to discuss, that is.] 16:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::If not inappropriate, could someone point out my request at ANI?--] (]) 16:27, 23 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Er im not sure what you are asking, the edit i made was purely to revert some vandalism. If you want to remove the neutrality tag just add a section on the pages talk page and see if other uses agree that it is now neutral. Or ] and remove the tag anyway =] --<font face="Comic Sans MS">''']''' ¤ ''']'''</font> 17:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please see ] and ]. Your addition of the phrase "after having plagiarized his dissertation" in the section concerning King's education suggests that you didn't read the article before you edited it or that you have a partisan agenda. Your claim on my Talk page that you have sources indicates that you ''still'' haven't read either article. — ] (] | ]) 20:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I responded to this user on his talk page, where I originally posted.Please follow his link above to that page for my response, and for an up to date look at the discussion, please see the talk page for MLK.] 05:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == MLK == | |||
| Seems to me that a parenthetical remark about plagiarism isn't out of line. I haven't been paying attention to the squabble, though, so I don't know what has sparked the disagreement. ] 01:33, 24 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| =="Decanonized" saints== | |||
| I've always had a problem with that category's name, because as you say, there's no such thing as "decanonization", though there is some attempt to explain this at the category page. Additionally different churches have different lists of saints. "Saints no longer in the universal calendar" will be able to include such things as Ursula and Christopher, on top of what we have there (mostly people related to the ]s, ahistorical figures that were never on the calendar, and the dog saint). I'm for a change (pretty much any change). You may wish to bring this up at ]; I'm sure they'll agree, and we can take it up at ].--] ]/] 20:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Username Concern == | |||
| Hello, and ]! | |||
| I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Misplaced Pages's ]. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|<p>{{{1|}}}</p>}} | |||
| I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern. | |||
| You have several options freely available to you: | |||
| * If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it. | |||
| * If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Misplaced Pages's ], such as ] from other Wikipedians. ] usually abide by agreements reached through this process. | |||
| * You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit ] and follow the guidelines there. | |||
| {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-username --> ]]] 06:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Your user name, in conjunction with the subjects you have edited, can be percieved as disruptive. Please consider changing your username to something like "DixiePride" or "Southern and Proud." ] <small>]</small> 07:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: My user name comes from the refrain for "Dixie". My grandfather's grandfather was wounded at the Battle of Kennesaw Mountian defending Atlanta from Sherman's advance. I have chosen this name to honor his sacrifice, and for all those who sacrificed when they were called to serve. As to if the cause was just, who knows? but he served with honor, and was honorably discharged, and pensioned. As far as you inferring that my edits were not in good faith is in violation of the policy of assume good faith, and the implication that they might not be, based on my user name is a personal attack.I do not owe you (Ursasapien) an explanation of my choice of user name, but I do believe in being civil. If this doesn't meet your requirements, then I invite you both to request mediation. If you can point out something specific in my edits to articles or their talk pages, then i also invite you to bring this up on those talk pages.] 08:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::: appears to be you arguing that Stormfront is not a hate site. Your campaign to edit Dr. ]'s article, inserting derogatory information, would make some wonder about your intentions. Then you use the words, "''fresh oot o' tha bogs" mick''," on the talk page of ]'s article. I certainly assume that you are editing in good faith, but your username seems to imply that you are willing to "die" for the "cause" of Dixie. I understand Southern pride and honoring your forefather's sacrifice. I just think this username is needlessly polemic. Imagine if someone's username was "Würfel für das motherland," a phrase from a song of WWII origin. Despite the best of intentions, this editor may have difficulty editing articles about the Holocaust. Please consider what I am saying and be assured that it comes from a place of good faith and good intentions. ] <small>]</small> 08:57, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: That is certainly cherry picking. Especially since the consensus on the Stormfront article is with me on that issue.Referenced third party sources that claim the organization is racist continue to appear in the article, which I'm not opposed to. My edit there has been taken out of context and mischaracterized.] 10:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : My concern on Hannity's page was that I thought that there was the continuous repetition of Irish ,Irish , and Irish. I would not characterize him as such( fresh oot o' tha bogs) or as a "mick", but it seemed to me that that was what the constant repetition of that was trying to say. i am of Irish descent, but my nationality is not Irish American. Unless I had an Irish passport, that is. As far as Stormfront, I think they are a bunch of azz clowns. I think they are misguided, and that there are haters on that site. But there are haters on Misplaced Pages, and I would be reluctant to describe this as a hate encyclopedia.I think it is POV to label the site as a hate site. The information i wanted to insert on MLK was only in reference to his plagiarism. If you have read my comments, then you will understand why.If you took the extra class option instead of the thesis option for you masters, then i could understand why plagiarism would not be worthy of mention at the same time as the degree.] 09:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Regardless, if I (who has many of the same preferences and political beliefs) read your username, look at your edits, and have questions, how will someone that is looking for racism under every stone percieve you as an editor? I would truly encourage you to consider changing your username. Don't start trouble for yourself. On another note, you may want to help me at ] which recently recieved Good Article status. ] <small>]</small> 09:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : We are playing tag. Kiss and make up. My comment on the "bogs" was to say that I thought someone was constantly repeating Irish to characterize him. It was not so long ago that people considered the Irish to be drunks, ignorant, and worthless. I felt that the constant adding of Irish was intended to imply that on the page. That is why I wanted at least two of the gratuitous mentions out.The nationality question was one of fact. That's all. I'll keep my user name, however.I use it on all the poker sites I play, on one of my email accounts, and in several places in my personal business.You take care, think about the small edit that I wanted to make on that page, and see if you could be gracious enough to allow me that.I'd agree to take out the whole nationality box rather than have one thing on Misplaced Pages be factually inaccurate.] 09:36, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I have left you a comment on my talk page. I do not wish to "kiss and make up." I wish to avoid you and the articles you edit. I have too many other interests and do not wish to get caught up in endless arguments with someone who thinks so rigidly. Please enjoy editing WP and understand that we are here to biuld an encyclopedia, not battle to make a ]. ] <small>]</small> 05:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Black Cross of Declan== | |||
| Oy! Thanks for the note. I was thoroughly unaware that symbol had been adopted by white power groups. I'm not removing it for now because a). the symbol has other associations and b). anyone who interacts with me will know I'm not a racist (also, I don't care about restrictions on the symbol in Europe, their laws don't apply to Floridians.) If it in the future it becomes such a problem that it takes time away from editing the encyclopedia, I'll remove it then. | |||
| All that said, you might want to reconsider your username if it' causing you problems in editing the encyclopedia. I don't think that user's case is very strong per the ], other than it can be seen as a violent reference. Additionally, the lyrics to Dixie are actually "live and die ''in'' Dixie", not "''for'' Dixie". Just a thought.--] ]/] 21:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::: The battle version's chorus is a little different] 22:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::No worries, it appears your name has been removed from ]. I can help you archive your talk page if you want, but that would not remove the category entirely. If that's your issue, you ought to ask ] about it, since he's the one who added it. He's a good user and should be able to help, especially now that the claim against your name was rejected.--] ]/] 22:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Can you help me get rid of that annoying little box at the bottom of my user page that links to that list? And the list to which it links. It seems a terrible list to just appear on.] 22:57, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] redux == | |||
| I owe you an apology. I'm sorry that I didn't assume good faith regarding your initial edits to ] | |||
| I'm not going to add my voice to those calling for you to change your Username, because I think editors should call themselves whatever they'd like, within the limits of obscenity and threats. But you may want to consider the first impression other editors may get when they see your Username. (And I speak from ].) | |||
| When I review changes to an article, I usually look at an editor's past contributions. When I saw that an editor named "Die4Dixie" added material about King's plagiarism to an article that already mentioned it, and I saw the edit that you had reverted at ], I jumped to the same conclusion that Orangemike described at ] — that your intentions were malicious. | |||
| I was wrong, and I apologize for that. | |||
| By the way, we probably agree about more things than you know. Except that "dying for Dixie" business. That doesn't sit so well with a Black Jew from New York. ] — ] (] | ]) 04:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You need to read my posts a bit closer, Malik: I '''never''' made that assumption about Die4, and I don't think my posts convey otherwise. While my family lost two sons fighting the Secessionists, in the 7th Tennessee Cavalry, I understand that a person can easily get tired of the way in which mainstream U.S. culture considers it acceptable to mock Southerners in a way that no other U.S. minority can be mocked. --] 04:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::There may be a misunderstanding here, and I want to clear it up. <u>'''I'''</u> jumped to the conclusion that Orange Mike described at ] — that somebody who was interested in writing more about King's plagiarism probably was trying to knock King — but I didn't mean to suggest that <u>Orange Mike</u> felt that way about Die4Dixie. I'm sorry if I wasn't clear, because Orange Mike specifically wrote that he <u>wasn't</u> including in his generalization those of us who were discussing the issue, including Die4Dixie. — ] (] | ]) 04:47, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == The Algerian NLF/FLN: == | |||
| Was the NLF in algeria ever a marxist group/ the article is unclear.ThanksDie4Dixie 23:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :No, it was not, even if it had a few Marxist members. It did describe itself as Socialist, but never Marxist, and among its first actions after independence was to ban the Moscow-backed Algerian Communist Party. (If you have any further questions, please continue on my talk page, but please be aware that I check it very irregularly...) ] 07:57, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Category removed == | |||
| I saw your request to remove this page from the username category it was automatically placed in, so I did it for you. Happy editing. ] / ] 17:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your Username == | |||
| It's not clear to me that you're aware of this and I think in all fairness that you should be. There is still a discussion regarding your username going on ]. Cheers, ] ]/] 20:43, 3 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I am going to respond to your most recent post to ] here, because I don't want to further disrupt the process there. Please understand that, though you may not agree on Ursasapien, the rest of the editors who have commented there are doing so in good faith. The ''process'' is in good faith, whether you believe the original report to ] was or not. I personally find nothing wrong with your name, but I can see where it might damage your credibility at times, which was why I recommended you change it. If you do not, that's fine, not the end of anyone's world and I hope the discussion doesn't make you feel unwelcome. That's not the point. Also, because you seem to be under the impression that it is, ] is not for administrators only to comment. I am not an administrator, neither is ArielGold. Jmlk17 happens to be one, Hmwith is...the rest? I don't know. Doesn't matter. Just a discussion board. Sometimes, those discussions result in blocks. "Homophobically Speaking", for instance, did. Yours doesn't appear to be going that way. Consensus seems to be to recommend a change and, if you don't want to, to let you go on your way. If you feel you are being harassed by Ursasapien (and I haven't looked at edits, so I don't have an opinion either way), then my recommendation would be that you visit ] or if you feel that it is ongoing and harsh enough to warrant it, consider making a report to ]. I strongly recommend against both, but they are available avenues to you. ''Always'' best if you can work out your differences together. Hopefully this clarifies things for you. Feel free to contact me on my talk page any time if you have questions. Cheers, ] ]/] 04:09, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Please allow me to state for the record that I have no doubt of the good faith of every editor on that page except the one that I have so vociferously excluded. I have assumed the good faith on that since the first second that I was made aware of the discussion there, with the one exception. We are not required to continue to assume good faith in the presence of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.. Anyone interested in understanding my objection to changing my user name based on the original complaint by Ursasapiens can follow this ]. As I find typing laborious with two fingers, I will not repeat my objections here.] 05:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sounds good to me. All that aside, I'll echo what A.D. has said below and want to assure you that I wasn't trying to ] you. Welcome to Misplaced Pages and if there's anything I can do for you, just let me know. Cheers, ] ]/] 11:23, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : I never felt bitten by you. I appreciated the sense of fair play that you showed when I missed the link to the discussion page. I hope I haven't caused you to regret having brought it to my attention.] 11:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: Not in the slightest; It's been a thought-provoking discussion since you arrived there. I just didn't want to see it disintegrate from the point. It's drawn attention, which is ''great'', because the more voices, the broader and better the consensus. So, no, I don't regret it at all. Take good care, ] ]/] 12:50, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Username discussion == | |||
| No problem. I only wrote what I felt. I honestly don't have a problem with your Username, it's just not a sentiment I share. :-) I hope you stick around, because you shouldn't let a bunch of closed-minded editors drive you away. If you do choose to take a break, I hope you come back. All the best. — ] (] | ]) 03:55, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == No worries == | |||
| No worries. You seem to be a good faith contributor who is doing good things, and I don't lkike to see someone like you penalised for only a possibly borderline user name. -- <strong>]</strong>] 09:33, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Please see my reply at ]. I have decided that the name is fine. -- <strong>]</strong>] 11:34, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: I did, and I thank you for it. I saw it shorty after you made it. I am not going to comment there for a while to allow others to reflect on what you've said, and hopefully come out directly for or against changing my username. This is not intended to at all be patronizing, but I am extremely impressed with your wisdom and maturity. I had taken the liberty of moving through some of the things you are working on. Take care and thanks for the kind words] 11:42, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::No, not patronizing in the slightest, but taken as a compliment, and I thank you. I hope the community shares my re-evaluated view on your username, which I think is just a harmless and unoffensive expression of your view of the War. -- <strong>]</strong>] 11:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Username debate == | |||
| Hi... you asked a question of me during the user name debate... but before I had a chance to respond the debate was closed. The problem reason why people view ] as racist is well outlined in the article on the song. In essence, the song is from the point of view of a former slave who is saying he misses his slavery. I'm sure that it's not how you meant it, but I think there is a fair chance that some people will take it that way. Have a nice day, ---] <small>(]/]/])</small> 00:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: Hi J. Smith. I saw your link to that troubling article. I had added a disputed neutrality tag to that article earlier today, and am discussing some of my concerns on that talk page now. The section in which it claims the song to be racist currently has no reliable third party cites, and appears to be the original research of an editor. I address my concerns about that on that articles talk page. I am also nominating the article for review of its good article status because the first part of it where most of the assertions are, is unsourced. The dancing is mentioned twice, which I see as gratuitous, since it appears to be trying to give undue weight. That the dialect used was exaggerated is unsourced too. Mark Twain( Samuel L. Clemens) was quite careful and faithful in his reproduction of the AAVE geolects of his time, and they don't appear to be much different to my untrained eyes. Suffice to say, I welcome another eye as we try and edit that article. Do I think black face to be a problematic issue in the history of the US? Unquestionably. I would be more inclined to say the attitude was more racialist. There are those who do not see a distinction; however, I find it curious when we impose our enlightened 21st century standards to an era had a different world view. I think that today Dixie is an accepted euphemism for the South, and does not attach, when used in that context the things that you are trying to impute to it. Might be because I'm from South Georgia, and live right down the road from Dixie, Georgia and a very short drive from Dixie County, Florida. Both Blacks and Whites here drink out of Dixie cups at family reunions. There have been no mass exoduses from either of these Dixies, nor calls for boycotts of plastic cups. I appreciate, in honesty that your concerns came from a good faith effort to help improve the community. I may yet change the name; however, if there are lingering concerns about my good faith, you are much better with me with this name. I rather imagine I have 20 sets of Wiki eyes following my edits. An anonymous editor would have the potential to be far more disruptive.] 01:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Mentoring == | |||
| I don't think I'm active enough these days to do any extensive mentoring, but I think it is a good idea in general. A few suggestions: | |||
| # Someone once said that the bulk of what is required from Misplaced Pages contributors can be summed up in one statement: "Don't be a dick." | |||
| # Half of that is "Assume good faith", at least in the absence of strong evidence to the contrary. | |||
| # If you want to change what a page says not just for the next few hours but on a long term basis, citations are essential. Uncited information is always liable to be removed, especially if it is controversial. | |||
| # Conversely, if (as in ]) you think material already in the article is poorly cited (rare in a featured article, and I haven't really looked closely at the details myself), it helps to be very concrete about what statement you think is ill-cited and request that the specific citation for that material be provided. | |||
| Hope that helps. Feel free to ask me any reasonably specific questions, but I'm not "living in Misplaced Pages" these days, so (as I said above) I won't have time to be a full-fledged mentor. - ] | ] 16:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| For future reference, whenever you request page protection, put the request at the top of the list so that the bot will not accidentally move it down with the completed ones above it. I have moved it there for you this time. Regards, '']''<small><sup>(<font color="0000FF">]</font>)</sup></small> 21:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Vandalism and West Monmouth School == | |||
| Hi. Vandal fighting is, of course, much appreciated, but please be careful when using the 'undo' reature to revert. Sometimes people vandalise pages over a series of edits and undo will only revert one edit at a time. See example: , , . Do check the to make sure you've reverted everything. – ] 21:13, 13 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: thanks.. I'll work on it.:)Die4Dixie 22:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the ], and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --] (]) 09:40, 13 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==email== | |||
| I did respond to the email you sent me, did you not receive it? Please feel free to email me your specific questions and I'll do my best to help. By the way you can sign your posts with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) this is a good idea because it time stamps your post and links to your user page. It's considered good ] to do this. All the best. ] (]) 06:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi. I'm glad to see that you stuck around, despite the welcoming committee. ] I think you made the right call on ]. That article made assertions about Jefferson and Hemings that went beyond what the ] article says. Thanks. — ] (] '''·''' ]) 00:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The link in your message didn't work, but I suspect you're referring to . It's certainly an invaluable resource, but it's also come under some criticism for a number of reasons. It had been 70 years since Emancipation, and many of those interviewed had been children when they were slaves. Their remembrances may not have been entirely accurate, especially under the circumstances of the Great Depression (which may have made the "bad old days" seem not quite as bad as the "bad new days"). Also, I think many or most of the interviews were conducted by white questioners, which may have led the former slaves to discuss some things and hold back about other things. Still, except for the few books written in the 19th century, the WPA interviews are the best we have. | |||
| :In any event, it's not ] article but you might want to consider adding a section toward the bottom of the article about the slave narratives (there's also a I stumbled across). You might want to mention earlier ]s (some of which were important in the abolitionist movement) as well as the 20th century narratives. Just a thought. — ] (] '''·''' ]) 01:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the ], and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --] (]) 17:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Dunning == | |||
| what do you want me to do? how can i help? ] (]) 23:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::why me? ] (]) 00:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Because you edited one of the talk pages I'm talking about. I'll find one and give you the link. I,m not asking for you to interject, although it is welcomed, but more a third party opinion.Die4Dixie 00:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==How to Strike== | |||
| <s>Like this</s> As far as the rest of your comments, it's fine with me to go back to square one and see if things work out more cooperatively. ] (]) 02:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --] (]) 07:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --] (]) 23:25, 25 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --] (]) 23:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Recent edits to ] == | |||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:|The discussion can be found under the topic ].}} <!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 05:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: thank you. Please see my response there. I want it linked one time when it is mentioned in the quote--Die4Dixie 05:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Some folks have been trying to revert all of the edits which you've made on Jeremiah Wright's article-- particular Grsz, who is quite the spin doctor. Just though you'd like to know.-] (]) 17:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for the heads-up. --] (]) 12:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Signatures == | |||
| Hm...Have you changed your signature on your ] page? That could be the problem. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 18:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: Let's see if thats it.] (]) 18:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::: YEAH! you're the greatest] (]) 18:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Out of Courtesy == | |||
| A thread has been opened at ], the thread can be found . <font style="font-family: Papyrus, sans-serif"><font color="#775ca8">]</font></font> 23:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Was just about to leave the notice, thanks for leaving it Rgoodermote.] <font color="purple">]</font> 23:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ditto ] (]) 23:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==TUCC== | |||
| Let me know your opinion of the edit I made about the paragraph we were talking about. ''']]''' 18:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Perfect. Clears up my concerns . the tag has been removed. Sorry for biting--] (]) 18:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Please stop wasting space at ]. The section isn't about what you accuse others of doing. If you feel like you need to, start a new section about me, but stop bringing up irrelevant issues under Carlos' section. ''']]''' 19:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: You and another ding-a-ling have certainly wasted enough space on me there.The edit warring was not my accusation, but the informed opinion of a true administrator. After reading your wannabe admin. warnings, I think that the distinction might impress you.--] (]) 19:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I have a real problem with your continued irrelevant posts. If you have a problem with me, start your own section there about it. What you're doing borders on ], as you came to that page with the sole purpose of criticizing me, which is irrelevant to Carlos' behavior. Please stop ] me, especially if all you're going to do is ]. ''']]''' 20:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: you are welcome to start yet '''''another''''' complaint in the same place. I see your crystal ball is working and you have correctly deduced my fell intentions<end sarcasm>--] (]) 20:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Personal attacks== | |||
| Hey, can you stop ] me? Ya, thanks. ''']]''' 02:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I saw your userpage. your userbox says you are agnostic. How is this an attack?--] (]) 02:09, 7 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Because you know damn well how you meant to say it. Also, these: , , . That's a pretty decent collection. ''']]''' 02:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::: you have ceaselessly reverted my edits because they did not mtch the POV that you want pushed. I admit that I have over reacted some, but between you, Thes and C.K Jones and the way ya'll act like you own the project, I've been where I can't see straight. you have reverted several of my good faith edits with out reading them, or completely reading them. You have called sourced material vandalism without even reading the cited material. I promise you that it gives me no pleasure to edit with your group. You can both give yourselves reach around barnstars from here until the convention comes.Your click started editwarring so noone could get an edit in until you got the whole article locked for three days and warned.I have never been involved with an article that couldn't be discussed without being locked. Congradulations, you made it happen.If you don't like how people react to your behavior, maybe you might try modifying it some.I see that you haven't tried to blanket my page with your officiously worded warnings the way you have used them to harass other editors.I'm not sure why not, perhaps you could tell me? When its all said and done, this is something that you have percipitated.I have some papers to write, so I'm not thinking that I can be involved in a project that through editors like yourself, has brought out the very worst in me. Good luck, enjoy your editing, obfuscate the truth, find God and a meaningful purpose for yourself, or whatever makes you happy.--] (]) 02:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Please, the whole "I'm a victim" deal is getting incredibly, incredibly old. Can you even provide a place where I reverted one of ''your'' edits for no reason? ''']]''' 02:42, 7 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::After taking a quick look at about 500 of your last edits, I haven't reverted one of your edits ''once''. ''']]''' 02:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hey, On my talkpage, you can go fuck yourself. The real crying has been by youwith your "please Mr. Dixie, don't be mean to me" routine.You are a douchebag. So why don't you put the nozzle back in your buddy's ass?--] (]) 02:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked for ] violations == | |||
| ]You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Misplaced Pages by making ]. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. <!-- Template:Npa5 --> ] <small>]</small> 03:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:45, 21 March 2023
Banned
The discussion at has determined that you are banned from Misplaced Pages. Accordingly, your account is blocked and you are not permitted to edit Misplaced Pages under any account or IP address until such time as the ban is lifted by community consensus or the Arbitration Committee. Sandstein 14:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012
 |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
- From the Editor
- What are You doing For Lent?
- Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
- Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism
Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Misplaced Pages • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
- That was pretty random, now, wasn't it?Die4Dixie (talk) 22:43, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Un-Ban: Request for consideration
I would like to request that the community consider returning editing privileges to my account.Die4Dixie (talk) 16:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not an admin but I'll endorse that. Whatever precipitated the ban notwithstanding, I've had nothing but positive interactions with D4D. - Wikidemon (talk) 23:06, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- If not inappropriate, could someone point out my request at ANI?--Die4Dixie (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2012 (UTC)