| Revision as of 20:46, 22 June 2008 editYami Takashi (talk | contribs)1,614 edits →I never said it did held one, i said that was the old rumor← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:39, 13 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,142,137 edits →Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (667 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{archivebox| | |||
| {{User:Artichoker/Templates/Navigation|image=Nuvola apps chat.png|pagename=discussion}} | |||
| #] | |||
| {{User:Artichoker/Templates/Message top}} | |||
| #] | |||
| <div style="float:right;width:25%;margin-bottom:5px"> | |||
| #] | |||
| {{User:Artichoker/Templates/Header|text=Contents}} | |||
| #] | |||
| {{User:Artichoker/Templates/Message top}} | |||
| #] | |||
| <center>__TOC__</center> | |||
| #] | |||
| {{User:Artichoker/Templates/Bottom}} | |||
| }} | |||
| {{User:Artichoker/Templates/Header|text=Archives}} | |||
| {{User:Artichoker/Templates/Message top}} | |||
| ] | |||
| <center>''None yet.''</center> | |||
| {{User:Artichoker/Templates/Bottom}} | |||
| </div> | |||
| {{User:Artichoker/Templates/Header|text=Welcome}} | |||
| {{User:Artichoker/Templates/Message top}} | |||
| Welcome to my '''discussion page''', where you can ask me questions, comment about my editing, etc. Please at the bottom. | |||
| == The ] Newsletter, Q1 2014 == | |||
| ]. If I have done something wrong, please leave a brief note on my talk page that you have written yourself. | |||
| {{User:Artichoker/Templates/Bottom}} | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| {{User:Artichoker/Templates/Header|text=Discussion}} | |||
| {{User:Artichoker/Templates/Message top}} | |||
| ==Template:Artichoker== | |||
| Hi, I have nominated your template at ] for ] as it is a test page. If you wish to contest this nomination, add {{tl|hangon}} to the top ] and explain why you think the page should be kept on the talk page. Do '''not''' remove the speedy deletion notice. Thank you. ](] , ]) 03:37, 6 November 2007 | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20140402}} | |||
| ==Recurring characters in The Legend of Zelda series== | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=596799481 --> | |||
| Heya, im the one who was "proving a point" on the re-occurring Zelda chars page. See, I added a part about Syrup the witch being hinted at in A link to the past for the GBA. It was deleted as speculation, but the entire page held very similar assumptions about characters. I feel that if my addition was removed, twice, then the page should be consistent. All the edits I did were professional and none vandalizing, I removed allot of speculation holding the same values that deleted my one little addition. I apologize if you saw it as vandalism, however it was just correcting hypocrisy, and I don’t think my "speculation" should have been removed when the page was littered with it. If mine was to be removed, then the rest should have been too. Misplaced Pages is filled with this kind of hypocrisy, and if my harmless addition is to be targeted, then I shall fix the entire page. I honestly did not mean to cause trouble, only fix what evidently is so important to defend to many others. ] (]) 06:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh! me again, if you want to discuss this with my feel free to e-mail me at Kitmouse@hotmail.com :D I do have a Misplaced Pages log in, but I don't use it often, and mostly just use Misplaced Pages at work. if you look at the history of this IP address, you will see I don't vandalize. ] (]) 06:31, 24 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hey. Well a lot of the stuff that you removed was not speculation, but notable information. You kind of went overboard, removing large chunks of writing of some good information. Your addition to Syrup the Witch was speculation, but that last edit you made to her can stay. Also, for future reference, please sign your comments with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). Thanks. ] (]) 15:08, 24 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Madoka work, and GA == | |||
| ==Races in The Legend of Zelda series== | |||
| Just to clear things up it is HoHo not Ho Ho i know this because did the research for the article and i never said the Gorons were a tribe i have been working on getting rid of that. and i dont know if its you but the yook are a tribe but this is refering to a collective race. ] (]) 22:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't know if you know this, but each page has its own edit history. This means you can tell exactly who changed something on that page. ] is the one who undid most of your changes (an example being the HoHo title). I was the one who reverted your edit from "Goron" to "Goron Tribe", however (I misread the edit history, and I apologize). If you have any questions regarding HoHo (or Ho Ho), please consult KrytenKoro, for I have no clue. Also, please sign your comments with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). Thanks. ] (]) 23:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| ==Pokemon abilities== | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]| ]}} | |||
| Concerning your revert of ]: | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| You wrote: ''Each Pokémon has one or two abilities according to its species.'' | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar''' | |||
| I'm not trying to get into an edit war, but this is false. Each species has one or two possible abilities, but each (individual) Pokemon can only have one ability. If you've got a better way to word it than it was written before, than by all means go ahead. ] (]) 22:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| :Actually, individual Pokémon can have more than one ability. For example, the Pokémon Hariyama has the abilities '''Thick Fat''' (Fire and Ice-type move inflict only 50 percent of the damage) and '''Guts''' (The Pokémon's attack power rises 1.5x when inflicted with a status condition). ] (]) 22:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Good work on '']'', probably looking good for GA. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 23:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Eh, I know for a fact that there's only one "Ability" slot for each Pokemon in R/S/E (so the Hariyama I caught could have Thick Fat or Guts, but not both). Maybe it's different in D/P. I don't know. I can't find any fansites or screens confirming one way or the other. ] (]) 22:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :::How would you know that there is only one ability slot for each Pokémon? Another example is the Pokémon Shuppet. In D/P, it has the abilities '''Insomnia''' (Pokémon cannot be put to Sleep) and '''Frisk''' (Allows you to see your opponent's hold items). I have confirmed that an individual Shuppet can hold both of these abilities at the same time (since this is very easy to test.) ] (]) 23:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Um, maybe because I've played the games? And if Lotad could have both Swift Swim and Rain Dish at once, I wouldn't have had to breed so many of them to get the 'right' ability? In any case, I guess they changed it in D/P. Nevermind. ] (]) 22:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks to recent expansion of the article, I'm thinking of nominating the article for Good Article class. What do you think? ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 23:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Character's Pokemon== | |||
| :First off, thanks for the barnstar; I really appreciate it! As for GA status, I would like to ask for you to hold off for now. I'm still in the midst of heavily expanding the article's production section and still have a ton more sources to sift through. If you would like to help, I also think the reception section could use some expanding, particularly the 'Awards and accolades'. I will also need to add a section to the lead talking about the reception, and then copywrite the prose of the article. Feel free to help me along the way! I hope to nominate the article for GA status when I am finished with these tasks in the coming several weeks. Cheers, ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 23:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| The show revolves around them catching Pokemon! Since that's the point of the show it's not worthy to name which types of Pokemon they have! Otherwise the articles are all like Max's, that they don't have any! Just leave them in there because their Pokemon are important to the plot of the show! --] (]) 21:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::It's been a few days, and already the article is looking better than ever. Should I nominate it for GA now, or just for a peer review? Outside feedback could also be helpful in improving the article; in fact, the article has the potential for FA class. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 13:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Pokémon are important of course, but nonnotable for the articles on characters like ]. Maintaining a list of all of his Pokémon is of limited interest, and so it should be taken out. ] (]) 22:18, 19 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::I would like to ask you to hold off on that for now. I will nominate the article for GA when I believe it is ready, and after I have finished making the improvements to the article. As I said before, I still have a few more sources to utilize for the production section, and then I also would like to further expand the reception section. That along with a major copyedit for the article are the main goals before I nominate the article for GA. But I agree with you that there could be potential for featured status in the future. Although I think some more pictures would need to be added, and admittedly, I am not too experienced with uploading images to Misplaced Pages. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 19:21, 10 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == List of Pokémon (1–51) == | |||
| ==Team Rocket== | |||
| Do you think it should be redirected? I've trimmed and pasted most of it. ] 15:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, I think it could be a redirect. I'll go do that now. Thanks. ] (]) 16:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| As you can see, the section is pretty clearly broken. I don't know what's causing it. I do know that my edit fixed it. – ] (]) 20:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Ash Ketchum== | |||
| :Yep, you are correct. I had already reverted my original edit and am now investigating as to why the template is breaking for Zubat. Do you have any ideas as to why this could be happening? ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 20:20, 18 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| While they may be anons, they are still editors. I think that removing his Pokemon counts as a controversial action due to the revert warring over it, and you should garner a consensus in a discussion before repeating the deletion. Cheers, '''<span style="border: 3px #FFD700 solid;background:#D4AF37;font-family: Serif"><font color="#D4AF37">-</font>]<font color="#D4AF37">-</font></span>''' 02:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Never mind, I ended up . It turned out to be a stray apostrophe at the end of the paragraph that messed everything up! Cheers, ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 20:41, 18 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes you do need to take our opinions into consideration. You constantly say that we have no reason worth editing it and that we need to give a reason, yet all you do is say "It's nonnotable." You're the only one who deletes it, and that's only your opinion. I would appreciate it if you would think of others and not only yourself!--] (]) 02:29, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Also you were saying how we need to get others approval to make edits about certain things, and yet I didn't see you making any discussions about weither the Pokemon sections should be removed. You were just hoping that nobody would listen to us because we were anons, but that's hypocrisy, you need to make discussions next time you make an edit!--] (]) 02:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::I do think of others, and I also think of the good of the ]. I have proved your claim, that I am the only one who deletes it, wrong on the ]. Hybrid here reminded me that I needed to make a discussion before I reverted again. And at the time of his posting here, my current version was on the article. Now someone has nicely started a section on the talk page, and I have responded to it. You however, do need to give a better argument as to why the Pokémon section should be added back. All you have done so far is make frivolous claims that distract from the original discussion. ] (]) 13:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Again, thanks for your edits on Madoka (seems your activity has slowed down lately though, if you don't mind, I'll put the article for a peer review once you finish your contributions). Anyway, I noticed that user New Age Retro Hippie has been merging a number of articles on different Pokémon into the different lists of Pokémon. I'm curious as to where this was discussed, as I can't find any such discussion on ]. Could you link to the relevant discussion? Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 08:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Is ] needed?== | |||
| :Yes, my activity has slowed down somewhat during these last few days because I am preparing to move to a new place and start a new job. However, I have a local draft of additional content that I am planning to add soon, after I am finished working on it. Don't worry, I still have plenty of contributions planned for the article to get it up to GA status in the upcoming weeks :) However, you are free to put it up for a peer review whenever you would like. | |||
| Google hits show all fansites. I added its parts to both games and anime. ] 16:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :No, it probably isn't. I think I'll make that a redirect too. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. ] (]) 17:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Regarding the the merging of some of the individual Pokémon articles, I am not aware of any discussion that happened. However, I am not necessarily opposed to his actions, and think he was simply acting ]. Of course, if you disagree with any of these merges, I'd definitely recommend you contact him as well as initiate discussion on the article talk pages and/or ]. I would also participate in these discussions so that we could reach a consensus. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 17:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Need an opinion on ]== | |||
| ::Incidentally, it also appears that discussion is taking place at ]. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 17:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Somebody is reverting this redirect to Pokemon regions saying "discuss it first." ] 14:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : |
:::Yes, and it's only going to grow. It looks like a notability discussion regarding a few ''Sonic'' characters is turning into something much larger – which I'm unhappy about on all counts but is the case. ] (]) 20:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Indeed. I have been lurking on those Sonic discussions and must say that the points about notability regarding significant and dedicated coverage are very interesting and somewhat compelling. However, I am unsure myself whether there is enough independent coverage of these subjects to constitute adequate notability. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 21:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Puella Magi Madoka Magica/archive2== | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ] You are invited to join the discussion at ]. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 09:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)<!--Template:Please see--> | |||
| Sorry I didn't get to the conflict in time, I had a bunch of stuff to do today and never sat down for more than a couple minutes. I see that ] has been taken to AFD, so perhaps that will help settle the issue. If there's still something more I can do, don't hestitate to ask. ] (]) 05:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Apologies == | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Unbelievable. This is starting to get tedious. I guess take it to AFD so we can get a consensus there as to the notability of said topic. Plus the title isn't even right, people never use the "é". ] (]) 14:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I got mixed up and added it in without double-checking. --] (]) 10:03, 22 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Barnstar== | |||
| The Editor's Barnstar | |||
| == It takes two to tango == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| I've contested your additions to the article. Do not give me a templated warning over this matter because you are as much in the wrong as I am for constantly acting without consensus.—] (]) 00:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| :I was simply following ]. For example, my first restoration of the content was due to what I thought was the end of the dispute after you admitted you had no policy arguments supporting your opinion. I then discussed further and restored the information with an additional, independent source. You however, have continually reverted three times without any concrete discussion besides what appears to be your own opinion on what policy "should" be, but not what it actually is. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 00:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Editor's Barnstar''' | |||
| ::No, you were edit warring because I reverted your bold addition and began a discussion. Just because you do not accept my arguments does not mean you get to restore the content. And I've since pointed out that the video game project guidelines exclude everything you have been using as a source. Not to mention one discussion at AFD does not constitute acceptance as a reliable source.—] (]) 00:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::Have you read our ] that you continue to talk about? As I show , this particularly GameSpot source completely complies as a reliable source under our WikiProject. Also, I am very puzzled at your remark about SlashGear. I very clearly linked you to of SlashGear which demonstrates that it has editorial oversight and is a reliable source. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 00:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::So long as either of them cite Serebii or the "leaks" neither are reliable sources under these circumstances. This information will be made officially public in two days. There is no reason Misplaced Pages has to report on it when the sourcing is questionable as I have been saying.—] (]) 00:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::You continue to say they can't be reliable because of "Serebii" or "leaks". But where is your policy-based argument to support their disinclusion? Once again, my edits are in-line with ], but your statements seem to continue to be a matter of your own opinion on which sources are reliable and which ones aren't. Once again, I am looking for ''actual Misplaced Pages policy'' on the merits of your arguments. Not just an opinion that "because it's a leak, we can't include it." Why not? As long as the source is reliable and the information is verifiable, why ''can't'' we include it? ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 00:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::If we already deem one website an unreliable source, why should other websites reporting the content and citing that website be considered reliable sources for this information?—] (]) 00:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Please see ]'s reply which I believe perfectly answers your question as to why it can still be reliable. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 00:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::He is still incorrect in taking Gamespot as a reliable source in this matter. We've gone through similar discussions on websites normally considered reliable reporting on information from what are internally considered to be unreliable sources in the past. This situation is no different.—] (]) 00:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::"We've gone through similar discussions on websites normally considered reliable..." Why do you continue citing these vague assertions as evidence without providing a single link to previous precedent or existing Misplaced Pages policy? Once again, it really just seems like this is all solely based on an opinion that you hold. In addition, please see my reply . ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 00:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Madoka again == | |||
| Well, the peer review for Madoka is winding down (no comments in two weeks), and good comments have been given. Hopefully someone could close the PR soon, as I'm itching to start a peer review for ]. | |||
| Anyway, looking at the article again, I don't really agree with the idea that the development section is too long. On the contrary, it's pretty well developed for an anime article. Pretty much the only thing that needs to be addressed now is more sources: I agree that the article relies a bit too much on ANN and could use other sources, especially Japanese ones. Hopefully you can go back to your previous level of editing soon. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 04:31, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks again for opening that PR. I agree with you that the production section is definitely not too long. And yes, I think a major thing that needs to be addressed in the article is it's reliance on ANN as a source (it seems about half of the sources are from that site). That will need to be remedied, and then I am still in the process of rewriting the Broadcast and Distribution section and the Other Media section. Finally, the reception section needs more detail (for which I have already done some research and collected more sources; I just need to transfer them into the prose) and I believe the article will then be ready for GA once those issues have been addressed and I plan to nominate it as soon as that happens. Hopefully I can get my Misplaced Pages workflow started back up again, as I am wrapping up my real-life transition to a new city. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 04:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for the reply. By the way, this is off-topic, but could you take a look at the article ]? It's the article I work on the most, since it's the article of my favorite singer. Could you leave me feedback on my talk page on how the article can be improved? Right now it's B-class (but honestly I feel the article's structure and prose need some work), but I feel that with the right amount of sourcing and good enough prose it could end up being a GA. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 08:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Also, I forgot to mention this, but the PR mentioned having a "Themes" section. To my knowledge, the only anime GA with a "themes" section is ], so I don't think it's that necessary. However, if there are reliable sources that explain the themes used in Madoka, then it's fine to include them. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 08:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Talkback== | |||
| {{talkback|Narutolovehinata5|Mami Kawada|ts=02:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
| ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 02:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == wisconsin == | |||
| Thank you. I didn't realize the story had been updated and revised downward. It said 63 counties when I grabbed it (which would match the URL), but of course your revert was correct with the story as it reads right now. Thank you! ] (]) 01:57, 13 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :No problem. Thanks for your help! ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 02:19, 13 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Misplaced Pages:Peer review/ClariS/archive1== | |||
| ] You are invited to join the discussion at ]. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 07:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)<!--Template:Please see--> | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2014 == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20140702}} | |||
| ] (]) 04:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=615133799 --> | |||
| == Some stroopwafels for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for your work on List of Pokemon Anime Characters, as I have been absent for a few weeks to revert the rampant fankruft and original research. ] (]) 12:38, 10 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Thank you! Cheers, ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 23:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Kawashita yakusoku wasurenai yo me wo toji tashikameru~ == | |||
| Thanks for nominating ] for good article status. Unfortunately, ] seems to have quite a bit of backlog at the moment, so like the other pending anime and manga GANs it could take a long while before any comments are made (I think there's one GAN from April that has yet to have any discussion started). Is it allowed to contact an experienced but uninvolved editor to take a look at the article and ask for comments? ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 10:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :No problem. As for the backlog, you're definitely right. GAN has had a backlog for as long as I can remember. In fact, if I get some more time, I'd like to start reviewing some of the older GANs and help reduce that backlog. As for my nomination of ''Madoka Magica'', I think we should just be patient. It'll be reviewed some time, and if that's a couple months down the road, that's okay. I certainly feel more sorry for the editors that have nominations still sitting there from like February. Hopefully I can help reduce that waiting time for them. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 19:29, 24 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well, no one's starting the discussion yet. Can you ask someone to start one for Madoka and the other pending anime GAs? ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 14:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'm not sure if we need to solicit anyone. Generally how the GA process works is you nominate the article GAN and then you wait for a reviewer to decide to review the article. GAN has a huge backlog though, so sometimes these things can take time. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 03:39, 7 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] lead section == | |||
| Hi, I've been expecting this article to be an ] already. Can you add to the lead section a paragraph about the production and development of the ''Madoka Magica'' anime? That way the lead feels more complete. <s>}I]|]I{</s> 01:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, I will do that. Probably won't be able to get to it today, but tomorrow I will try and add a paragraph to the lead about production. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 23:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks, I'm happy! ] <s>}I]|]I{</s> 00:37, 27 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::I wish you can finish that paragraph before the GA review starts. How come you didn't edit for a week before today.<s>}I]|]I{</s> 02:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Sorry things have been hectic. I'll get it added in there. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 03:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/School Rumble== | |||
| ] You are invited to join the discussion at ]. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 14:38, 8 September 2014 (UTC)<!--Template:Please see--> | |||
| ==Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Mami Kawada/archive2== | |||
| ] You are invited to join the discussion at ]. Sorry for asking for more comments, but since, per your suggestion, I've put it up for peer review, comments are appreciated. Thank you. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 08:27, 9 September 2014 (UTC)<!--Template:Please see--> | |||
| :Thanks for letting me know. I'll try to get to it, along with my other obligations, this weekend. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 00:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well, since no one has added to the discussion yet, comments are welcome. Also, good job on Madoka, as always. Maybe you can try improving the other articles covered by ], such as the articles on SAO, Love Live, and others. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 11:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks! I would love to improve more anime articles, but that will have to come in due time. I'm currently in a real crunch. Things should hopefully clear up in a few weeks though. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 22:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2014 == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20141001}} | |||
| ] (]) 00:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=627494845 --> | |||
| ==Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#RfC== | |||
| ] You are invited to join the discussion at ]. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 10:12, 28 October 2014 (UTC)<!--Template:Please see--> | |||
| ==Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Mami Kawada/archive3== | |||
| ] You are invited to join the discussion at ]. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 05:37, 11 December 2014 (UTC)<!--Template:Please see--> | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 04:21, 16 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See ] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 18:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can ] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 00:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |- | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | ], right? Congratulations! ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 01:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your thorough de-crufting of ], ] and ], it impressed me. Knowing what to delete is equally important as knowing what not to delete. Nice work. <font face="Century Schoolbook">'''] (])'''</font> 18:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |} | ||
| : |
:Much appreciated! I'm just so glad the article of my favorite series is now a GA. I thank you for all of your help along the way. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 02:14, 18 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::You're welcome. By the way, do you have any more suggestions for Mami's page? I plan to nominate it for GAN once the peer review is finished. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 04:27, 18 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::Nothing came to mind. I think any changes left to be made will be minor and can easily be accomplished during the GAN process. ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 05:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Nothing I did not expect from that successful GA nomination. And by the way, I've actually grown tired of ''Madoka Magica'' (because that anime was not horrifying to me as everyone thought it is). But don't worry, I'm usually enjoying happiness. ] <s>}I]|]I{</s> 07:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I liked the visuals in ''Madoka Magica'' though. <s>}I]|]I{</s> 22:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2014 == | |||
| == Your revert at Bullying == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20150107}} | |||
| Not only was "challenged" better word choice, it was what was used in the source material, since that text was from a direct quote. (Incidentally, since the editor who changed it had a history of such edits—and a history of warnings—he's been blocked for 24 hours.) Thank you for catching that and cleaning it up! —''']''' (]) 15:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :No problem, always glad to help. <span style="padding-top:4px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]</sup></span> 15:58, 7 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=637863057 --> | |||
| == So I just decided to check in on my old[REDACTED] user page: == | |||
| == Great Scott == | |||
| And I saw . I've checked the user's talk page, and they appear to have never even been disciplined for this, and instead found messages about what a valued editor they were. I know this is extremely, extremely delayed notice, but...what the actual hell is going on?<small>] ]</small> 02:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Hey there, Artichoker. I see that you've reverted the mentioning of Scott's name on the ] article, citing ] as a reason, quite a few times already. Keep it up. ] -- ] ] ] 13:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Their contributions last back to 2006, so this wasn't some random flyby troll that immediately shaped up once they were informed of the rules, either. This appears to have been an incredibly blatant, malicious attack.<small>] ]</small> 02:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you, comments like this are always appreciated. <span style="padding-top:4px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]</sup></span> 13:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Nevermind. It looks like he's stopped editing anyway so there's nothing to do remedy-wise. Just kind of confirms my impression of wikipedia, I guess.<small>] ]</small> 02:43, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hi {{ping|KrytenKoro}}. I actually did warn the user for that particular edit of vandalism . In any case, it's good to hear from you. It's certainly been a while. Cheers, ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 02:53, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Huh. Okay. I was confused by that, since he'd been a user since 2006, but okay. Thanks!<small>] ]</small> 04:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Re: MissingNo. == | ||
| I ended up reverting it, but only because the information he added is actually in the article, in the section directly above it. I'm wary about going into further detail regarding the glitch simply because that was one of the harder bits to 'lock down' during the FA, as it was up in the air just how much information someone would need to know on how to trigger the glitch for a reader completely unfamiliar with the game or even gaming itself.--] (]) 01:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2015 == | |||
| ] (]) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! <br /> | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20150401}} | |||
| Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{tls|Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message. | |||
| ] (]) 15:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| </div><!-- Template:Cookie --> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=645375747 --> | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2015 == | |||
| == May == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20150701}} | |||
| Why was ] not merged? ] 21:19, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 13:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't know, I guess because no one was bold and did it, and there was no discussion about it. You could go ahead and merge it right now. I'm okay with that. Also, ], ], and ] still have separate articles as well. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=657410093 --> | |||
| ::Misty's notability is clear to me. Brock and Ash have been in the series for more time, so they could be more notable. ] 21:32, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::But you are saying May does not have enough notability, right? <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 21:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Ok, according to your merge of ], I guess so. Let it be known that I support this though. Cheers, <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 21:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2015 == | |||
| == Zelda enemies == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20151007}} ] (]) 20:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Thank's a lot for writing up that section. I know I've not been much help this time, but honestly, I have an excuse (that my computer is in the shop, and I'm using my mother's old clunky one instead). What should I be doing to help fill out the sections? | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=674815859 --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Also, I feel that some of the enemies you removed are indeed traditional or recurring throughout the series. I'm going to back them up to a sub-section on the talk page so that we can iron out what the standard is, this time around.<small>] ]</small> 13:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey no problem, and if you could maybe expand and improve the section I wrote, that would be awesome. And I'm sorry if I removed some important enemies, you are free to add them back if you wish. Cheers, <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 14:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Pick up in pokemon == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692057745 --> | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2015 == | |||
| why did you remove that, i cited it with a site and everything.] (]) 18:13, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20160106}} | |||
| here is a youtube video that shows it | |||
| ] (]) 05:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=687820424 --> | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2016 == | |||
| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFn9pqOYvus | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20160406}} | |||
| a jpg | |||
| ] (]) 01:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=713035266 --> | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2016 == | |||
| http://pages.prodigy.net/maryjorhodes/pokemon_truck.jpg | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20160703}} ] (]) 17:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| that's proff, and as i said i had cited it with a reference to a site. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=728990546 --> | |||
| ] (]) 18:18, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Awards== | |||
| a wiki with it info on it | |||
| Hey, so, I edited the wiki and of course I provided a link since you told me to do so and there are those idiots undoing my edit with no explanation/reason. Could you tell them to stop already? Here's the link: http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2012-07-09/yumiko-kawahara-madoka-magica-win-sense-of-gender-awards <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| http://wiki.answers.com/Q/In_what_city_is_the_truck_in_pokemon_blue] (]) 18:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :First of all none of the links you provided are valid (YouTube, a picture, and an unsourced wiki.) Second, the whole text; about a truck appearing in game, is completely non-notable. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 18:25, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| ==Mudflap (Transformers) page== | |||
| I fixed the issues that got the image deleted after talking to the admin who deleted the image. It should be fixed now. ] (]) 22:26, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, thanks for the heads-up, although next time you should talk to the admin before restoring the edit. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 22:27, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Notability of Giovanni unclear... == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| But where to merge? He's not just a piece of anime, and correct me if wrong -- he has been more in games. ] 11:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| :What? He has made one or two appearances in a couple games (R/B/Y/FR/LG); he is much more prominent in the anime, so if his article was to be merged, it would certainly go to the ]. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 11:11, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/26&oldid=750600328 --> | |||
| ::What about the rest of material? Summarise there itself? ] 11:40, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yes, all of the text on ] should be trimmed and summarized on ]. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 11:42, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Circus Vargas Performers == | |||
| Hello, Artichoker. | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2016 == | |||
| My name is Zdrack (My parents are Trekkers) | |||
| I need information from you on how to keep the performer's list on the Circus vargas page. | |||
| I am a performer at Circus Vargas, and Mr. Quiroga had asked me to update the performers list, but I notice you have removed it. | |||
| May I put it up again. | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20161003}} | |||
| I'll soon learn how to sign my posting. | |||
| ] (]) 21:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Zdrack <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 13:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=753545140 --> | |||
| :Hi, I suppose the performers list could be re-added, but the rest (such as list of accidents and such) fail ]. And you sign your posts, just type four tildes at the end of your comment (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). Thanks. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 13:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::After looking over the expansive list of mostly non-notable performs, I think it would be best just to add the management section back. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 13:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2016 == | |||
| Thank you very much. I'm still learning. | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20170102}} | |||
| Hey, Artichoker! With all your delitions, I wanted to know why are you against ]? | |||
| ] (]) 02:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
| I did not begin that page, but I was asked, by Circus Vargas management to correct it, since there were some wrong information on it. And they requested that I update the performers list. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=753545140 --> | |||
| == Geoff Iddison listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Geoff Iddison'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 10:44, 12 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2017 == | |||
| ] (]) 17:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20170402}} | |||
| ] (]) 19:10, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 04:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :I will tell you that I am absolutely not against that article (nor any article for that matter.) I was simply removing some details that do not belong on this encyclopedia. See ]. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 17:45, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=771657781 --> | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2017 == | |||
| I read through ] and I am not able to see your point. | |||
| The performers, past and present is an integral part of ]. | |||
| I have noticed that other articles list their circus performers. | |||
| <div style="width:100%; text-align: left;"> | |||
| ] (]) 20:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <div style=" background-color: #eeeeee; border-top: 4px #eeeeee solid; border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; text-align: center; padding: 0.5em; margin:0em;"><div style="float:left;">]</div> | |||
| :]. And which articles are you talking about, I have looked through a few circus articles, and none of them mention their performers. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 20:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="float: center;"> | |||
| <span style="font-size:150%;">The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter</span><br /> | |||
| <span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">Volume 10, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2017</span> <br /> | |||
| <span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">] ] | ] | ] ]</span> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <div style="border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-bottom: 5px #eeeeee solid; margin:0em;padding:1em; background:#FEFEFE;"> | |||
| <big>'''Project At a Glance'''</big><br> | |||
| This are just a few where their performers are mention. | |||
| As of Q2 ], the project has: | |||
| I'll look for more when I have the time. | |||
| {{Col-begin}} | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| * 211 ] | |||
| * 70 ] | |||
| * 11 ] | |||
| * 1 ] | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| * 28 ] | |||
| * 1,172 ] | |||
| * 23 ] | |||
| {{Col-end}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| <big>'''Content'''</big> | |||
| {{Col-begin}} | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| <!--*]--> | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| *Feature: ] | |||
| *Feature: ] | |||
| <!--*]--> | |||
| {{Col-end}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| {{Collapsible list | |||
| |title=<big>Project Navigation</big> | |||
| |1=<div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;"> | |||
| ;VG Project Main pages | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| ;VG Project Departments | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| ; | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| </div>}} | |||
| <div class="center">'''To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, ] to update the distribution list.'''<br /><small>(Delivered 14:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC))</small></div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Distribution requested by User:Thibbs at WT:MMS --> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=789183807 --> | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2017 == | |||
| ]http://en.wikipedia.org/The_Greatest_Show_on_Earth | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20171001}} | |||
| ]http://en.wikipedia.org/Circuses#Circus_acts | |||
| ] (]) 00:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=801426750 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
| ]http://en.wikipedia.org/Ringling_Brothers_and_Barnum_and_Bailey_Circus#Names | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| ] (]) 23:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, fair enough. However, note that in each of the examples you have provided that only five or six of the main performers are listed. You can go ahead and add back some of the performers, but try to limit them to the most important/main ones, not every single person participating in the project. Cheers, <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 23:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| Then again this seems to be your gig, and it gives you a sence of power, so we'll move on and leave all to you. | |||
| It's not the end of the world for us. | |||
| ] (]) 23:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Nope, I am not feeling any sense of power, just a will to help benefit the encyclopedia. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 23:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you, will do on my next visit. | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| ] (]) 00:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=813406620 --> | |||
| == Madoka FAC == | |||
| Artichoker my man, you ARE power hungry. Why do you do deleting other peoples articles and contribution just because you do not like them. | |||
| I guess is time for me to move on. You keep the power. | |||
| Hello. I've now nominated ] for FA status, would it be okay with you to be a co-nominator of the nomination? Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 02:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 03:13, 21 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Naruto, see my on the nomination page. I don't think nominating for FAC is appropriate at this time. What do you believe has significantly changed about the article since and how have those original concerns been addressed? ''']'''<sup>]''']</sup> 03:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :No, I am simply trying to help maintain an encyclopedia. I tagged your article for ] because it did not show ], which it must. Then an ] who agreed with me deleted it. This has absolutely nothing to do with whether I like the article or not. I honestly don't know where you get that. Try reading some policies instead of falsely accusing people. Thanks, <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 11:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| ==]== | |||
| My article on beast master was not usless dude. What the heck i mean when i first played adventure quest i had no idea what a beast master was. so i looked on wiki and it wasnt there. then i played the game and learned about the beast master and decided to put it on wiki and now u think that its not acceptible for other people to learn about. what ur problem? | |||
| :It is a non-notable fictional character from a video game, and most likely doesn't warrant mention in ]. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 02:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| its not a character. its a type of ability in a video game. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:34, 18 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :That makes it even less notable. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 02:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| you delet articles just because isnt not notable | |||
| :Exactly, its called ]. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 02:40, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| my article would be notable because there are over 40,000 users who have an account on adenture quest. lol there are almost 10 new accounts every day. i am sure a new user would want to know what a beast master is. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:44, 18 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ::Just because the game is popular certainly does not make an ability within it notable. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 02:48, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| you will see how people talk about this skill on other forums if you type in "beastmaster class" on google. I wouldnt consider this type of skill non-notable. | |||
| :Forums, google; those doesn't ] anything at all. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 02:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Forums can verify how many people talk about the topic and why they talk about it. Its not like forums doesnt deterimine how popular a topic is or there would be no topic. And guess what there are forums on a beastmaster. And people around the world seem to talk about it.] (]) 03:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Please read ]. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 10:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Your right. I do not have proof for my aritcle. But I see that most of your atricles arent verified either. So please get some work cited for those or I will have a reason not to verify my articles.] (]) 13:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :What articles are you talking about? Can you provide some examples, and also please do not ]. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 14:16, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Examples:ned's declassified school survival guide. I feel that you did not find that from a source. And i also feel that it is not notable either. The fact that ned met mose in the third grade or something. How would that fact be notable.] (]) 14:31, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| And the ocean avenue (song) there is no verification for that article either.] (]) 14:33, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::"you"? I don't believe I have ever edited that article, and if I did it was mostly for copy-editing. So I frankly don't know what you are talking about. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 14:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| If you look under your contibutions and look for ned's declassified school survival guide and ocean avenue (song) articles you will see that you have worked on those articles with no verification. I dont think it matters "how" you worked on them its the fact that you changed or added something with no verification. ] (]) 14:45, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Excuse me? Please remember to ]. Did you even look at my revisions. I was simply copyediting, which requires no sources. This means that it DOES matter "how" I worked on them. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 14:48, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Its the fact that I dont think your consuming good faith either. My beast master was notable enough to be put on wiki. If I put all the[REDACTED] requriements on it would you let me do another article on it? ] (]) 15:00, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I have assumed good faith; I am trying to be helpful and point you in the right direction. Beastmaster is an ability in a computer game; this makes it entirely ], and I honestly doubt it would ever meet all of the Misplaced Pages requirements. However, if you were able to show that it displays notability, then it can have an article. This most likely is impossible as once again it is an ability in a computer game; entirely in-universe, etc. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 15:03, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Pokémon types == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| What the use of this guide? ] 19:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| :This most likely should be merged into ]; thoughts? <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 19:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=866997855 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello, I saw on Misty's page. I'm not very familiar with the anime, but I figured you would be, so I thought I'd bring the edit to your attention instead of reverting it myself. ] (]) 22:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi, and thank you for bringing this to my attention. This is absolute vandalism and I will revert it. Hehe Pokémon is a little kid's show, there's no way there would be any romance at all. Cheers, <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 22:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Proffessor Louie & The Crowmatix is the correct spelling please don't change it again. Futurehawk (talk) 02:48, 19 June 2008 (UTC | |||
| :Are you sure you are not spelling ''Professor'' wrong (as it is supposed to only have one 'f'.) A search of Google shows that your spelling is most likely wrong. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 02:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm not spelling it at all the artist spells it that way http://www.greatblueheron.com/ ] (]) 03:32, 19 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::OK fair enough. Cheers, <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 14:04, 19 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| ==]== | |||
| It's true that Pokemon Gold and Silver batteries can be recharged if you get 100+ hours on it...It happened to my Gold version. However, it usually does not last longer than a few hours. The reason that G/S batteries recharge is because while playing, the battery does not need to work because it uses the System's battery. I've read about it here: http://www.serebiiforums.com/showthread.php?t=164862. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :Um okay. Thank you for this information, although I don't see how it pertains to any of my editorial actions. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 01:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| :...You said you doubted it...So i gave you some evidence that it works. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=866997855 --> | |||
| ::Yes, well it was unsourced. If you could source it using a valid website (not Serebii,) it would be allowed to stay. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 03:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2019 == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter/20190707}} | |||
| ] (]) 22:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Torchiest@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=905749739 --> | |||
| == WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3 == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20191006}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:GamerPro64@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=916242202 --> | |||
| == WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q4 2019 == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20200105}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:GamerPro64@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=930444237 --> | |||
| == WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q1 2020 == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20200405}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:GamerPro64@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=946217842 --> | |||
| == WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q2 2020 == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20200705}} | |||
| 03:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:GamerPro64@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=964928886 --> | |||
| == WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3 2020 == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20201004}} | |||
| ] (]) 02:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:GamerPro64@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=980684277 --> | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2020 == | |||
| <div style="width:100%; text-align: left;"> | |||
| <div style=" background-color: #eeeeee; border-top: 4px #eeeeee solid; border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; text-align: center; padding: 0.5em; margin:0em;"><div style="float:left;">]</div> | |||
| <div style="float: center;"> | |||
| <span style="font-size:150%;">The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter</span><br /> | |||
| <span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">Volume 12, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2020</span> <br /> | |||
| <span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">] ] | ] | ] ]</span> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <div style="border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-bottom: 5px #eeeeee solid; margin:0em;padding:1em; background:#FEFEFE;"> | |||
| <big>'''Project At a Glance'''</big><br> | |||
| As of Q4 ], the project has: | |||
| {{Col-begin}} | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| * 239 ] | |||
| * 88 ] | |||
| * 10 ] | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| * 33 ] | |||
| * 1,650 ] | |||
| * 28 ] | |||
| {{Col-end}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| <big>'''Content'''</big> | |||
| {{Col-begin}} | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| {{Col-end}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| {{Collapsible list | |||
| |title=<big>Project Navigation</big> | |||
| |1=<div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;"> | |||
| ;VG Project Main pages | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| ;VG Project Departments | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| ; | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| </div>}} | |||
| <div class="center">'''To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, ] to update the distribution list.'''<br /><small>(Delivered 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC))</small></div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| --] (]) 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Path slopu@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=994482657#Readership --> | |||
| == The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2021 == | |||
| <div style="width:100%; text-align: left;"> | |||
| <div style=" background-color: #eeeeee; border-top: 4px #eeeeee solid; border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; text-align: center; padding: 0.5em; margin:0em;"><div style="float:left;">]</div> | |||
| <div style="float: center;"> | |||
| <span style="font-size:150%;">The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter</span><br /> | |||
| <span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">Volume 13, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2021</span> <br /> | |||
| <span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">] ] | ] | ] ]</span> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <div style="border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-bottom: 5px #eeeeee solid; margin:0em;padding:1em; background:#FEFEFE;"> | |||
| <big>'''Project At a Glance'''</big><br> | |||
| As of Q1 ], the project has: | |||
| {{Col-begin}} | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| * 241 ] | |||
| * 89 ] | |||
| * 10 ] | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| * 34 ] | |||
| * 1,684 ] | |||
| * 31 ] | |||
| {{Col-end}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| <big>'''Content'''</big> | |||
| {{Col-begin}} | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| {{Col-end}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| {{Collapsible list | |||
| |title=<big>Project Navigation</big> | |||
| |1=<div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;"> | |||
| ;VG Project Main pages | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| ;VG Project Departments | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| ; | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| </div>}} | |||
| <div class="center">'''To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, ] to update the distribution list.'''<br /><small>(Delivered 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC))</small></div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| -- ] (]) 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Biodev@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=1016803813 --> | |||
| == Latest (and most likely final) issue of the WP:VG newsletter == | |||
| <div style="width:100%; text-align: left;"> | |||
| <div style=" background-color: #eeeeee; border-top: 4px #eeeeee solid; border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; text-align: center; padding: 0.5em; margin:0em;"><div style="float:left;">]</div> | |||
| <div style="float: center;"> | |||
| <span style="font-size:150%;">The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter</span><br /> | |||
| <span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">Volume 14, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2023</span> <br /> | |||
| <span style="color:#333333; font-variant: small-caps;">] ] | ]</span> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <div style="border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-bottom: 5px #eeeeee solid; margin:0em;padding:1em; background:#FEFEFE;"> | |||
| <big>'''Project At a Glance'''</big><br> | |||
| As of Q4 ], the project has: | |||
| {{Col-begin}} | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| * 259 ] | |||
| * 95 ] | |||
| * 10 ] | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| * 35 ] | |||
| * 1,862 ] | |||
| * 31 ] | |||
| {{Col-end}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| <big>'''Content'''</big> | |||
| {{Col-begin}} | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| {{Col-2}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| {{Col-end}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| {{Collapsible list | |||
| |title=<big>Project Navigation</big> | |||
| |1=<div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;"> | |||
| ;VG Project Main pages | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| ;VG Project Departments | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| ; | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| *] – ] | |||
| </div>}} | |||
| <div style="text-align: center;">'''To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, ] to update the distribution list.'''</div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| Delivered by: ] (]) 09:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Terasail@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Video_games/Newsletter&oldid=1143529343 --> | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| == I never said it did held one, i said that was the old rumor == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| rumors are just that rumors, the information is also notable and is not speculating. Go to the discussion portion of the article and you can see that i have posted enough sources that proves the truck exists. The mew might not be there but at least its a truck and the only truck or car i have ever seen in those old games.] (]) 15:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, so there is a truck in the game. I fail to see how this is notable at all. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 15:36, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| Your sarcastic and clear bias response on this matter stands against what[REDACTED] dictates against when it comes to being a editor. I am only trying to contribute to the article. I don't see how my contribution is hurting the article. You come off as personally attacking me since you have repeatedly undone my contributions and responded to me in the talk page of the article with a bias tone. | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| Misplaced Pages even dictates that you should not just delete something without thinking, and if you can just improve on it. Despite my stance that if the truck doesn't belong then neither should the fancclub, i at least didn't go and delete that when you deleted my contribution. This shows that i am not trying to cause trouble. All i want to do is contribute to a article that barly has a paragraph for each city when there are so much more that could be added.] (]) 19:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| :I wouldn't call what I'm saying "sarcastic," as I am simply pointing out that I fail to see your information's notability. Your contribution hurts the article by introducing something that is nonnotable. Reverting your edits is not a personal attack, and I wouldn't consider my comments "biased." | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| :I will tell you right now that I always think before performing a reversion; when I saw your contribution I also saw that it did not add any not notable information to ]. I have already said why the Pokémon Fan Club is notable enough to warrant inclusion on the ]. If you do not want to cause trouble, please refrain from adding back your information until we have reached a consensus. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 19:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| You kept sayign it was speculation, and saying it was non notable and coming off in your responses and you edit summaries as attacking. You also go and undo it without actually going in and editing it . And it is not speculation. You also undid a third option editor and if he found anything wrong with the article and my contribution he would have fixed it, you are vandalizing the article ] (]) 20:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Saying something is nonnotable, etc. is NOT a personal attack. I undid it because there is simply nothing else to edit. I undid the other editor's edits because it was simply adding an image to your information, etc. This is called a ''content dispute'', calling my edits vandalism is both careless, and almost a personal attack. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 20:14, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| the other editor fixed the image i added. He also has seconded that the info belongs, and if he didn't he would have removed it. you seem to be the only one against it so why do you have the right to remove it. you should wait for consensus against it before i wait for consensus for it] (]) 20:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Consensus should be reached BEFORE making the controversial edit to the article. Therefore the original version should stay while discussion is going on. I shall also say that we do not ] on Misplaced Pages. We reach consensus, so just because another editor shares your view does not mean you are right and I am wrong. <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 20:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| and that means it doesn't make you right either | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 --> | |||
| == Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
| I've seen the truck with my own two eyes doing it that hardest way possible by gong through the game without HM 01, and the phantom PC is just as real as the pokemon center pcs or the one in the Pokemon leagues. You also say your not attacking me on a personal level or non bias but your edit summaries say different. | |||
| Hello, | |||
| "evising this paragraph for now, as the other edit was careless enough to simply revert my edit without viewing the changes" | |||
| I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
| "Removing speculation, gamecruft, and nonnotable information. Please do not add this back until consensus is reached on the talk page" | |||
| Take the survey ''''''. | |||
| "the fact that there is a truck in this game is completely nonnotable" | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| "emoving speculation (and as a matter of fact it does NOT hold a mew." | |||
| ] | |||
| Each time i provided citations/references which proves its not speculation. I have repeatedly said that the mew thing was not only a rumor but false as well. ] (]) 20:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :See my reply . <span style="padding-top:3px;padding-left:2px;padding-right:2px;background-color:#f5faff;border:#cedff2 1px solid">''''']'''''<sup>]]</sup></span> 20:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| Don't think you can use your rank to intimidate me or attack me, your wanring on my talk page proves you are attacking me directly and being bias. ] (]) 20:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744489 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 00:39, 13 November 2024
 Archives |
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2014
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue 
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2014, the project has:
|
Content
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
Madoka work, and GA
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| Good work on Puella Magi Madoka Magica, probably looking good for GA. Narutolovehinata5 23:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks to recent expansion of the article, I'm thinking of nominating the article for Good Article class. What do you think? Narutolovehinata5 23:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- First off, thanks for the barnstar; I really appreciate it! As for GA status, I would like to ask for you to hold off for now. I'm still in the midst of heavily expanding the article's production section and still have a ton more sources to sift through. If you would like to help, I also think the reception section could use some expanding, particularly the 'Awards and accolades'. I will also need to add a section to the lead talking about the reception, and then copywrite the prose of the article. Feel free to help me along the way! I hope to nominate the article for GA status when I am finished with these tasks in the coming several weeks. Cheers, Artichoker 23:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- It's been a few days, and already the article is looking better than ever. Should I nominate it for GA now, or just for a peer review? Outside feedback could also be helpful in improving the article; in fact, the article has the potential for FA class. Narutolovehinata5 13:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- I would like to ask you to hold off on that for now. I will nominate the article for GA when I believe it is ready, and after I have finished making the improvements to the article. As I said before, I still have a few more sources to utilize for the production section, and then I also would like to further expand the reception section. That along with a major copyedit for the article are the main goals before I nominate the article for GA. But I agree with you that there could be potential for featured status in the future. Although I think some more pictures would need to be added, and admittedly, I am not too experienced with uploading images to Misplaced Pages. Artichoker 19:21, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- It's been a few days, and already the article is looking better than ever. Should I nominate it for GA now, or just for a peer review? Outside feedback could also be helpful in improving the article; in fact, the article has the potential for FA class. Narutolovehinata5 13:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
List of Pokémon (1–51)
As you can see, the section as you've left it is pretty clearly broken. I don't know what's causing it. I do know that my edit fixed it. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yep, you are correct. I had already reverted my original edit and am now investigating as to why the template is breaking for Zubat. Do you have any ideas as to why this could be happening? Artichoker 20:20, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Never mind, I ended up fixing it. It turned out to be a stray apostrophe at the end of the paragraph that messed everything up! Cheers, Artichoker 20:41, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Again, thanks for your edits on Madoka (seems your activity has slowed down lately though, if you don't mind, I'll put the article for a peer review once you finish your contributions). Anyway, I noticed that user New Age Retro Hippie has been merging a number of articles on different Pokémon into the different lists of Pokémon. I'm curious as to where this was discussed, as I can't find any such discussion on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Pokémon. Could you link to the relevant discussion? Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 08:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, my activity has slowed down somewhat during these last few days because I am preparing to move to a new place and start a new job. However, I have a local draft of additional content that I am planning to add soon, after I am finished working on it. Don't worry, I still have plenty of contributions planned for the article to get it up to GA status in the upcoming weeks :) However, you are free to put it up for a peer review whenever you would like.
- Regarding the the merging of some of the individual Pokémon articles, I am not aware of any discussion that happened. However, I am not necessarily opposed to his actions, and think he was simply acting boldly. Of course, if you disagree with any of these merges, I'd definitely recommend you contact him as well as initiate discussion on the article talk pages and/or the wikiproject talk page. I would also participate in these discussions so that we could reach a consensus. Artichoker 17:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Incidentally, it also appears that discussion is taking place at User talk:Tezero#Pokémon. Artichoker 17:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, and it's only going to grow. It looks like a notability discussion regarding a few Sonic characters is turning into something much larger – which I'm unhappy about on all counts but is the case. Tezero (talk) 20:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Indeed. I have been lurking on those Sonic discussions and must say that the points about notability regarding significant and dedicated coverage are very interesting and somewhat compelling. However, I am unsure myself whether there is enough independent coverage of these subjects to constitute adequate notability. Artichoker 21:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, and it's only going to grow. It looks like a notability discussion regarding a few Sonic characters is turning into something much larger – which I'm unhappy about on all counts but is the case. Tezero (talk) 20:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Incidentally, it also appears that discussion is taking place at User talk:Tezero#Pokémon. Artichoker 17:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Puella Magi Madoka Magica/archive2
You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Puella Magi Madoka Magica/archive2. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 09:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Apologies
I got mixed up and added it in without double-checking. --occono (talk) 10:03, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
It takes two to tango
I've contested your additions to the article. Do not give me a templated warning over this matter because you are as much in the wrong as I am for constantly acting without consensus.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- I was simply following WP:BRD. For example, my first restoration of the content was due to what I thought was the end of the dispute after you admitted you had no policy arguments supporting your opinion. I then discussed further and restored the information with an additional, independent source. You however, have continually reverted three times without any concrete discussion besides what appears to be your own opinion on what policy "should" be, but not what it actually is. Artichoker 00:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- No, you were edit warring because I reverted your bold addition and began a discussion. Just because you do not accept my arguments does not mean you get to restore the content. And I've since pointed out that the video game project guidelines exclude everything you have been using as a source. Not to mention one discussion at AFD does not constitute acceptance as a reliable source.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Have you read our internal guidelines that you continue to talk about? As I show here, this particularly GameSpot source completely complies as a reliable source under our WikiProject. Also, I am very puzzled at your remark about SlashGear. I very clearly linked you to the editorial page of SlashGear which demonstrates that it has editorial oversight and is a reliable source. Artichoker 00:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- So long as either of them cite Serebii or the "leaks" neither are reliable sources under these circumstances. This information will be made officially public in two days. There is no reason Misplaced Pages has to report on it when the sourcing is questionable as I have been saying.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- You continue to say they can't be reliable because of "Serebii" or "leaks". But where is your policy-based argument to support their disinclusion? Once again, my edits are in-line with WP:V, but your statements seem to continue to be a matter of your own opinion on which sources are reliable and which ones aren't. Once again, I am looking for actual Misplaced Pages policy on the merits of your arguments. Not just an opinion that "because it's a leak, we can't include it." Why not? As long as the source is reliable and the information is verifiable, why can't we include it? Artichoker 00:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- If we already deem one website an unreliable source, why should other websites reporting the content and citing that website be considered reliable sources for this information?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Please see hahnchen's reply here which I believe perfectly answers your question as to why it can still be reliable. Artichoker 00:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- He is still incorrect in taking Gamespot as a reliable source in this matter. We've gone through similar discussions on websites normally considered reliable reporting on information from what are internally considered to be unreliable sources in the past. This situation is no different.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- "We've gone through similar discussions on websites normally considered reliable..." Why do you continue citing these vague assertions as evidence without providing a single link to previous precedent or existing Misplaced Pages policy? Once again, it really just seems like this is all solely based on an opinion that you hold. In addition, please see my reply here. Artichoker 00:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- He is still incorrect in taking Gamespot as a reliable source in this matter. We've gone through similar discussions on websites normally considered reliable reporting on information from what are internally considered to be unreliable sources in the past. This situation is no different.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Please see hahnchen's reply here which I believe perfectly answers your question as to why it can still be reliable. Artichoker 00:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- If we already deem one website an unreliable source, why should other websites reporting the content and citing that website be considered reliable sources for this information?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- You continue to say they can't be reliable because of "Serebii" or "leaks". But where is your policy-based argument to support their disinclusion? Once again, my edits are in-line with WP:V, but your statements seem to continue to be a matter of your own opinion on which sources are reliable and which ones aren't. Once again, I am looking for actual Misplaced Pages policy on the merits of your arguments. Not just an opinion that "because it's a leak, we can't include it." Why not? As long as the source is reliable and the information is verifiable, why can't we include it? Artichoker 00:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- So long as either of them cite Serebii or the "leaks" neither are reliable sources under these circumstances. This information will be made officially public in two days. There is no reason Misplaced Pages has to report on it when the sourcing is questionable as I have been saying.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Have you read our internal guidelines that you continue to talk about? As I show here, this particularly GameSpot source completely complies as a reliable source under our WikiProject. Also, I am very puzzled at your remark about SlashGear. I very clearly linked you to the editorial page of SlashGear which demonstrates that it has editorial oversight and is a reliable source. Artichoker 00:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- No, you were edit warring because I reverted your bold addition and began a discussion. Just because you do not accept my arguments does not mean you get to restore the content. And I've since pointed out that the video game project guidelines exclude everything you have been using as a source. Not to mention one discussion at AFD does not constitute acceptance as a reliable source.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Madoka again
Well, the peer review for Madoka is winding down (no comments in two weeks), and good comments have been given. Hopefully someone could close the PR soon, as I'm itching to start a peer review for ClariS.
Anyway, looking at the article again, I don't really agree with the idea that the development section is too long. On the contrary, it's pretty well developed for an anime article. Pretty much the only thing that needs to be addressed now is more sources: I agree that the article relies a bit too much on ANN and could use other sources, especially Japanese ones. Hopefully you can go back to your previous level of editing soon. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 04:31, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks again for opening that PR. I agree with you that the production section is definitely not too long. And yes, I think a major thing that needs to be addressed in the article is it's reliance on ANN as a source (it seems about half of the sources are from that site). That will need to be remedied, and then I am still in the process of rewriting the Broadcast and Distribution section and the Other Media section. Finally, the reception section needs more detail (for which I have already done some research and collected more sources; I just need to transfer them into the prose) and I believe the article will then be ready for GA once those issues have been addressed and I plan to nominate it as soon as that happens. Hopefully I can get my Misplaced Pages workflow started back up again, as I am wrapping up my real-life transition to a new city. Artichoker 04:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. By the way, this is off-topic, but could you take a look at the article Mami Kawada? It's the article I work on the most, since it's the article of my favorite singer. Could you leave me feedback on my talk page on how the article can be improved? Right now it's B-class (but honestly I feel the article's structure and prose need some work), but I feel that with the right amount of sourcing and good enough prose it could end up being a GA. Narutolovehinata5 08:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Also, I forgot to mention this, but the PR mentioned having a "Themes" section. To my knowledge, the only anime GA with a "themes" section is Neon Genesis Evangelion, so I don't think it's that necessary. However, if there are reliable sources that explain the themes used in Madoka, then it's fine to include them. Narutolovehinata5 08:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 02:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Narutolovehinata5 02:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
wisconsin
Thank you. I didn't realize the story had been updated and revised downward. It said 63 counties when I grabbed it (which would match the URL), but of course your revert was correct with the story as it reads right now. Thank you! 2601:4:1B80:156:41F2:12F8:5E6C:197A (talk) 01:57, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks for your help! Artichoker 02:19, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Peer review/ClariS/archive1
You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/ClariS/archive1. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 07:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2014
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2014, the project has:
|
Content
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!
|
Thanks for your work on List of Pokemon Anime Characters, as I have been absent for a few weeks to revert the rampant fankruft and original research. NathanWubs (talk) 12:38, 10 July 2014 (UTC) |
- Thank you! Cheers, Artichoker 23:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Kawashita yakusoku wasurenai yo me wo toji tashikameru~
Thanks for nominating Puella Magi Madoka Magica for good article status. Unfortunately, WP:GAN seems to have quite a bit of backlog at the moment, so like the other pending anime and manga GANs it could take a long while before any comments are made (I think there's one GAN from April that has yet to have any discussion started). Is it allowed to contact an experienced but uninvolved editor to take a look at the article and ask for comments? Narutolovehinata5 10:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- No problem. As for the backlog, you're definitely right. GAN has had a backlog for as long as I can remember. In fact, if I get some more time, I'd like to start reviewing some of the older GANs and help reduce that backlog. As for my nomination of Madoka Magica, I think we should just be patient. It'll be reviewed some time, and if that's a couple months down the road, that's okay. I certainly feel more sorry for the editors that have nominations still sitting there from like February. Hopefully I can help reduce that waiting time for them. Artichoker 19:29, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Well, no one's starting the discussion yet. Can you ask someone to start one for Madoka and the other pending anime GAs? Narutolovehinata5 14:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if we need to solicit anyone. Generally how the GA process works is you nominate the article GAN and then you wait for a reviewer to decide to review the article. GAN has a huge backlog though, so sometimes these things can take time. Artichoker 03:39, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well, no one's starting the discussion yet. Can you ask someone to start one for Madoka and the other pending anime GAs? Narutolovehinata5 14:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Puella Magi Madoka Magica lead section
Hi, I've been expecting this article to be an WP:GAN already. Can you add to the lead section a paragraph about the production and development of the Madoka Magica anime? That way the lead feels more complete. }IMr*|(60nna)I{ 01:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, I will do that. Probably won't be able to get to it today, but tomorrow I will try and add a paragraph to the lead about production. Artichoker 23:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'm happy! =D
}IMr*|(60nna)I{00:37, 27 August 2014 (UTC)- I wish you can finish that paragraph before the GA review starts. How come you didn't edit for a week before today.
}IMr*|(60nna)I{02:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)- Sorry things have been hectic. I'll get it added in there. Artichoker 03:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- I wish you can finish that paragraph before the GA review starts. How come you didn't edit for a week before today.
- Thanks, I'm happy! =D
Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/School Rumble
You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/School Rumble. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 14:38, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Mami Kawada/archive2
You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Mami Kawada/archive2. Sorry for asking for more comments, but since, per your suggestion, I've put it up for peer review, comments are appreciated. Thank you. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 08:27, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. I'll try to get to it, along with my other obligations, this weekend. Artichoker 00:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well, since no one has added to the discussion yet, comments are welcome. Also, good job on Madoka, as always. Maybe you can try improving the other articles covered by WP:ANIME, such as the articles on SAO, Love Live, and others. Narutolovehinata5 11:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! I would love to improve more anime articles, but that will have to come in due time. I'm currently in a real crunch. Things should hopefully clear up in a few weeks though. Artichoker 22:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well, since no one has added to the discussion yet, comments are welcome. Also, good job on Madoka, as always. Maybe you can try improving the other articles covered by WP:ANIME, such as the articles on SAO, Love Live, and others. Narutolovehinata5 11:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2014
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2014, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#RfC
You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#RfC. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 10:12, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Mami Kawada/archive3
You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Mami Kawada/archive3. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 05:37, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Puella Magi Madoka Magica
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Puella Magi Madoka Magica you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 04:21, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Puella Magi Madoka Magica
The article Puella Magi Madoka Magica you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Puella Magi Madoka Magica for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 18:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Puella Magi Madoka Magica
The article Puella Magi Madoka Magica you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Puella Magi Madoka Magica for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 00:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| You already know what this barnstar is for, right? Congratulations! Narutolovehinata5 01:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC) |
- Much appreciated! I'm just so glad the article of my favorite series is now a GA. I thank you for all of your help along the way. Artichoker 02:14, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome. By the way, do you have any more suggestions for Mami's page? I plan to nominate it for GAN once the peer review is finished. Narutolovehinata5 04:27, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nothing came to mind. I think any changes left to be made will be minor and can easily be accomplished during the GAN process. Artichoker 05:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nothing I did not expect from that successful GA nomination. And by the way, I've actually grown tired of Madoka Magica (because that anime was not horrifying to me as everyone thought it is). But don't worry, I'm usually enjoying happiness. =D
}IMr*|(60nna)I{07:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)- I liked the visuals in Madoka Magica though.
}IMr*|(60nna)I{22:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- I liked the visuals in Madoka Magica though.
- Nothing I did not expect from that successful GA nomination. And by the way, I've actually grown tired of Madoka Magica (because that anime was not horrifying to me as everyone thought it is). But don't worry, I'm usually enjoying happiness. =D
- Nothing came to mind. I think any changes left to be made will be minor and can easily be accomplished during the GAN process. Artichoker 05:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome. By the way, do you have any more suggestions for Mami's page? I plan to nominate it for GAN once the peer review is finished. Narutolovehinata5 04:27, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2014
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2014, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
So I just decided to check in on my old[REDACTED] user page:
And I saw this. I've checked the user's talk page, and they appear to have never even been disciplined for this, and instead found messages about what a valued editor they were. I know this is extremely, extremely delayed notice, but...what the actual hell is going on?Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 02:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Their contributions last back to 2006, so this wasn't some random flyby troll that immediately shaped up once they were informed of the rules, either. This appears to have been an incredibly blatant, malicious attack.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 02:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nevermind. It looks like he's stopped editing anyway so there's nothing to do remedy-wise. Just kind of confirms my impression of wikipedia, I guess.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 02:43, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hi @KrytenKoro:. I actually did warn the user for that particular edit of vandalism here. In any case, it's good to hear from you. It's certainly been a while. Cheers, Artichoker 02:53, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Huh. Okay. I was confused by that, since he'd been a user since 2006, but okay. Thanks!Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 04:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hi @KrytenKoro:. I actually did warn the user for that particular edit of vandalism here. In any case, it's good to hear from you. It's certainly been a while. Cheers, Artichoker 02:53, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nevermind. It looks like he's stopped editing anyway so there's nothing to do remedy-wise. Just kind of confirms my impression of wikipedia, I guess.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 02:43, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Re: MissingNo.
I ended up reverting it, but only because the information he added is actually in the article, in the section directly above it. I'm wary about going into further detail regarding the glitch simply because that was one of the harder bits to 'lock down' during the FA, as it was up in the air just how much information someone would need to know on how to trigger the glitch for a reader completely unfamiliar with the game or even gaming itself.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2015
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2015, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2015
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2015, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2015
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 3 — 3nd Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2015, the project has:
|
Content
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2015
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2015, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2016
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2016, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2016
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2016, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Awards
Hey, so, I edited the wiki and of course I provided a link since you told me to do so and there are those idiots undoing my edit with no explanation/reason. Could you tell them to stop already? Here's the link: http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2012-07-09/yumiko-kawahara-madoka-magica-win-sense-of-gender-awards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.38.21.38 (talk) 19:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2016
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2016, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2016
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2016, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Geoff Iddison listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Geoff Iddison. Since you had some involvement with the Geoff Iddison redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 10:44, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2017
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2017, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2017
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2017, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
(Delivered 14:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC))
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2017
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2017, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
(Delivered ~~~~~)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Madoka FAC
Hello. I've now nominated Puella Magi Madoka Magica for FA status, would it be okay with you to be a co-nominator of the nomination? Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 02:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Naruto, see my reply on the nomination page. I don't think nominating for FAC is appropriate at this time. What do you believe has significantly changed about the article since the last time we discussed this and how have those original concerns been addressed? Artichoker 03:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Artichoker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2019
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2019, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
(Delivered ~~~~~)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 2 — 3nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2019, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
(Delivered ~~~~~)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q4 2019
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 3 — 4th Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2019, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
(Delivered ~~~~~)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q1 2020
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
(Delivered ~~~~~)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q2 2020
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
(Delivered ~~~~~)
03:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3 2020
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
(Delivered ~~~~~)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2020
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
(Delivered 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC))
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2021
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 13, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2021
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2021, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
(Delivered 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC))
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Latest (and most likely final) issue of the WP:VG newsletter
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 14, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2023
Previous issue | Index
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2022, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,