Revision as of 21:15, 12 July 2008 editRFC bot (talk | contribs)216,124 editsm Update, 13 current discussions← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:43, 5 September 2008 edit undoHarej (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users25,255 edits redirect | ||
(47 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT ] | |||
'''The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:''' | |||
* <strong>]</strong> ] failed to resolve which of two versions of a paragraph should be used in the lead | |||
* <strong>]</strong> Dispute over the validity of references, have already been through Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources | |||
* <strong>]</strong> cannot establish consensus on content | |||
* <strong>]</strong> Is ] part of the ]? | |||
* <strong>]</strong> It is currently under dispute if today version of article which is speaking about Creation of Yugoslavia is NPOV | |||
* <strong>]</strong> It is currently under dispute as to what the content and subject of this article should consist of. | |||
* <strong>]</strong> There exists disagreement concerning the order of Righteous Among the Nations by country, the inclusion of ] in lieu of an article on the Belgian Righteous Among the Nations, and the absence of a link to ]. The discussion begins under Order" and continues under "My proposal". | |||
* <strong>]</strong> Several issues are at dispute, including whether or not a controversial claim made by a commercial advertisement is encyclopedic material. | |||
* <strong>]</strong> Are images of Diocletian and Maxentius without Constantine essential to an article on Constantine | |||
* <strong>]</strong> There is still no consensus on whether we should use Duchy of Samogitia or Eldership of Samogitia. See discussion and proofs presented in the linked section. | |||
{{#ifeq:{{{hide_instructions}}}|yes| |{{RFC tagging instructions|RFChist}} }} | |||
<noinclude>''For more information, see ]''</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 23:43, 5 September 2008
Redirect to: