| Revision as of 19:46, 4 August 2008 editMatthead (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers21,271 edits →Sedan← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:58, 26 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,311,942 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Matthead/Archive2010) (botTag: Manual revert | ||
| (415 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 1 | |||
| |algo = old(7d) | |algo = old(7d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Matthead/ |
|archive = User talk:Matthead/Archive2010 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| ] |
{{Archive box|]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]}} | ||
| == ] & Signpost == | == ] & Signpost == | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
| {{Signpost-subscription}} | {{Signpost-subscription}} | ||
| {{DYK}} | {{DYK}} | ||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Matthead. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has rendered decisions passing a motion to apply discretionary sanctions remedies to the case linked above. Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict ("articles which relate to Eastern Europe, broadly interpreted") if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. | |||
| The final text of the motions can be found at the case page linked above. | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/3&oldid=750539315 --> | |||
| — ] <sup>]</sup> ''for the Arbitration Committee,'' 14:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Notability of ] == | |||
| ]<!-- use ] for YELLOW flag --> A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please ]. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the ]. | |||
| If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to the top of the article ('''just below''' the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Misplaced Pages guidelines. | |||
| For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria ], ], ], or ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn --> ] (]) 13:28, 2 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry, but when I saw the article it contained virtually no content, and in particular no indication of why the subject was considered notable - nor did a quick Google search turn up any obvious indication of notability (any hits were swamped by ]). The article had not been edited for 10 minutes, and there was no indication (such as {{tl|underconstruction}}) that additional content was forthcoming in the near future. I have removed the {{tl|db-bio}}, but in the future it might save everyone some time if you create articles in a more complete form. I understand your annoyance about over-eager speedy tagging, but I believe that under the circumstances this particular tag was not unreasonable. Thanks, ] (]) 14:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: While tagging may not have been unreasonable, it still was annoying. I had to connect some dots first too, creating some articles, adding links to already existing articles etc, all while being busy in discussion, and on German Wiki, too (where they speedily deleted my stub on the battle). In the future, I recommend to you to have a look into the recent contribs of the user to see what he is busy with. Rome was not build in a day either. -- ] ] 14:13, 2 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Move == | |||
| What is your proposed move in relation to Kulmerland? ] (]) 16:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, the article the redirect points to should be moved, see ] for discussion and sources. The current name is unsourced, the article should be at the common name in English, ]. -- ] ] 16:42, 3 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Your rename of ] == | |||
| Matthead, I don't think that asking you to file a proper ] request for a controversial rename is a "reckless POV pushing". Your suggestion to rename the article to the German name has been already contested by another editor before, and you've been advised to go for WP:RM instead. Why did not you do it but instead renamed the article yourself ? As to of yours, I have no doubt that you did it on purpose to make a simple revert of your rename impossible. And now you are reporting me ???! :-) --]<sup>]</sup> 13:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Sedan == | |||
| Did you even read my comment on ] before reverting? I am not disagreeing with you about the ambiguity; in fact, I tend to think you are correct. But my objection is about ''process'' -- this is a potentially disruptive change to many other articles that shouldn't be done without discussion and consensus. The correct course is to use the template {{tl|move}} to propose a move of ] ''to'' ], then list the proposal on ]. If you do that, we can form a consensus instead of having an edit war. --] ] 13:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I did not move, some body else did. The ''potentially disruptive change'' is not disruptive, all articles can be fixed, with a bot if needed. No harm done, except to the old habits of a few. -- ] ] 15:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::That's not the point (and your estimate of the capabilities of bots is, sadly, overly optimistic). The point is that there's no way to determine whether it's "a few" or many until the move has been proposed and discussed; continuing to revert the redirect is not constructive. ]'s been an article about a type of car for the past two years plus; will it hurt anyone if stays that way for another ten days or so to allow discussion? --] ] 15:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Well, as I understand, it was your RussBot which fixed the links this afternoon anyway? Kind of ironic? Whatever, I've cast my vote at the move proposal, and I'm out of this for now. -- ] ] 19:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Sedan Edit War == | |||
| I have protected ] given the on-gong edit war. I would remind you of ]. You have reverted this article three times. I have chosen to protect in this case. However, repeat conduct like this will likely result in blocking. Please discuss this issue on the relevant talk pages. Community consensus should determine the result; not edit warring. Let me know if you have any questions. --] (]) 19:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:58, 26 November 2024
 Archives |
|
User talk:Matthead/Archive2006 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Did you know & Signpost
 |
|---|
| 15 January 2025 |
|
Ruins of the Jethani Temple
- ... that the Jethani Temple (ruins pictured) may have collapsed under its own weight?
- ... that the T24 Festival was organized after a former soldier boasted online that he could set up a 24-person military tent by himself?
- ... that the organ console at the Loew's Jersey Theatre was originally installed at another theater by mistake?
- ... that Margaret Reid is the first woman to have served as President of the Australian Senate?
- ... that The Hangover by Toulouse-Lautrec, which features the stylistic influence of Vincent van Gogh, was once displayed by Aristide Bruant in his nightclub?
- ... that there were "jubilant" cheers from the courtroom audience when three students were acquitted of the murder of Fernando Rios?
- ... that the discontinuation of a Warsaw-based Yiddish literary journal in the summer of 1939 was unrelated to the invasion of Poland?
- ... that Olympic gold medalist Lao Lishi was one of eight bell-ringers for the Alibaba Group's listing on the New York Stock Exchange?
- ... that according to the Mercurius Aulicus, 400 soldiers were routed by six officers and a boy during the English Civil War?
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Matthead. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.