| Revision as of 21:01, 20 August 2008 editRFC bot (talk | contribs)216,124 editsm Update, 14 current discussions← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:43, 5 September 2008 edit undoHarej (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users25,255 edits redirect | ||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| '''The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:''' | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> Should there be an extra comma after the year? What is the proper grammar to use in this situation? With this discussion, there is also a possibility of renaming the article. Please discuss. | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> To find a solution on whether or not using "Beit Guvrin" as Bayt Jibrin's original Aramaic name in the article. | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> image may reflect out of date or racist science | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> Is this article too long and should it follow a "For vs. Against" outline for clarity? | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> Are there sufficient reliable, secondary sources to warrant calling Thomas Hobbes a classical republican? | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> Are eye witness accounts from a controversial work, ], considered reliable sources | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> Is Taxila Ancient India or Ancient Pakistan | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> back and forth edits on historic importance of current and future events, appropriateness of naming businesses, and notability of a weekly sale. Arguments for and against are listed in the section above and ] | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> Request help with whether comments constitute weasel words. | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> Whether it is good or bad proses to use the word "attacks" to define "attack" and whether or not it is original research to use a wikipedia-created title in the introductory sentence rather than the terminology used by respected reliable sources such as CNN, CBC, CBS, and the BBC. | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> dispute as to whether money can consist of material with intrinsic value without a certifying authority, or whether it requires a "trusted" certifying authority (also reported to RFChist) | |||
| {{#ifeq:{{{hide_instructions}}}|yes| |{{RFC tagging instructions|RFChist}} }} | |||
| <noinclude>''For more information, see ]''</noinclude> | |||
Latest revision as of 23:43, 5 September 2008
Redirect to: