Revision as of 09:32, 25 August 2008 editHighKing (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers27,854 edits →break: support← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:22, 17 January 2025 edit undoPrimeBOT (talk | contribs)Bots2,079,652 editsm →Not the Republic of Ireland: Task 24: template replacement following a TFDTag: AWB | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes}} | |||
{{move|Ireland (state)}} | |||
{{Round in circles|search=no|topic=the article's title}} | |||
{{FAQ|collapsed=no}} | |||
{{Hiberno-English}} | |||
{{Article history | |||
|action1=GAN | |||
|action1date=12:02, 11 August 2010 | |||
|action1link=Talk:Republic of Ireland/GA1 | |||
|action1result=not listed | |||
|action1oldid=378342053 | |||
|currentstatus=FGAN | |||
|topic=geography | |||
|otd1date=2004-12-29|otd1oldid=16335536|otd2date=2005-12-29|otd2oldid=33182518|otd3date=2012-04-18|otd3oldid=487887885|otd4date=2013-04-18|otd4oldid=550895649|otd5date=2019-04-18|otd5oldid=893042316|otd6date=2020-04-18|otd6oldid=951408541 | |||
{{WikiProject Ireland | |||
|otd7date=2022-04-18|otd7oldid=1083449318 | |||
|small= | |||
|nested= | |||
|class= A | |||
|importance=top | |||
|attention= | |||
|peer-review= | |||
|old-peer-review= | |||
|image-needed= | |||
|needs-infobox= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= | |||
{{V0.5|class=A|category=Geography}} | |||
{{WikiProject Ireland|importance=top}} | |||
{{FAOL|Afrikaans|af:Republiek van Ierland}} | |||
{{WikiProject Celts|importance=top}} | |||
{{calm talk|lightgreen}} | |||
{{WikiProject Countries}} | |||
{{WikiProject Irish republicanism|importance=top}} | |||
<!-- Template:Archive box begins --> | |||
}} | |||
<div class="infobox" style="width: {{{box-width|231px}}}"> | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
<div style="padding-top: 4px; text-align: center">{{{image|]}}}'''<br/>]''' | |||
|archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | |||
</div> | |||
|maxarchivesize = 100K | |||
---- | |||
|counter = 21 | |||
# ] | |||
|minthreadsleft = 4 | |||
# ] | |||
|algo = old(30d) | |||
# ] | |||
|archive = Talk:Republic of Ireland/Archive %(counter)d | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# | |||
</div><!-- Template:Archive box ends --> | |||
{{To-do|small=yes}} | |||
== Name Mediation == | |||
After another debate on this issue (different talk page) the suggestion of mediation was made to finally end it. The request is at the top of the page. People who have discussed this issue before are included.] <sup>]</sup> 15:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Where is the other debate, on a different talk page, that decided mediation should take place and that you refer to? ] (]) 15:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::] is the place you seek. ] (]) 15:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::I'm sorry, but what's going on here now? Wikipéire starts a holy war on another article, and then opens a request for mediation with editors who were not involved in that debate, and on a topic ('move "Republic of Ireland" to "Ireland"') which has had no overt discussion here for 4 or 5 weeks? Am I getting this right? ] (]) 16:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Pretty much. Should be interesting to watch at least. ] (]) 16:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::Yawn, yawn. This topic has been discussed about every 6 months and no consensus has ever been reached to change the status quo, so ] keeps flogging the same dead horse until he drives away enough decent editors and gets his way. Drop it for once and for all. It's old hat and boring. Let me repeat that, it's boring. Mediation is unneeded and unwarranted, ] likely wants to just bring in more people who have little knowledge of the topic and can be convinced by his constant pushing. ] (]) 17:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::I personally perfer '''Ireland (state)''' or '''Ireland (country)'''. But, whatever's decided at Mediation? IMHO, should be respected for at least 12-months. ] (]) 18:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::ww2c is right. This is just flogging a dead horse, and there is no need for mediation. --] <small>] • (])</small> 18:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Just as long as no-one takes pictures of it, otherwise I think we fall afoul of the new British extreme porn laws. ] (]) 18:59, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Your reaction is just what I expected. You've always been against the move. Just because something has been there for a long time don't mean its right. I would have thought for WikiProject members getting the main country's name right would be important for an encyclopedia! Anyway we'll see what the mediation brings.] <sup>]</sup> 19:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::What? Me or BHG? I only just got brought into this...and there is no moral imperative in the[REDACTED] naming of the article and what is correct is a matter of perspective. ] (]) 19:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::Oh sorry not you. I was talking plurally to most of the other editors who have commented so far. Should have placed my comment better.] <sup>]</sup> 19:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::Wikipéire, it's absolutely fine to believe that you are right, but what's not fine is that you don't seem to accept that other editors can legitimately disagree with you, and that repeatedly raising the same issue is disruptive. --] <small>] • (])</small> 00:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
I've volunteered to mediate this issue within the ]; however only if people from both camps want to go through with it - see my ] for a possible goal. I just mention it in case some of the involved editors don't watch the case page - I'll just keep it open for a while. ] (]) 08:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Yes, I think we need to try mediation here. ] (]) 21:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Closed the case. Only the "pro-move" camp supported the mediation, plus the original requester was banned permanently. ] (]) 10:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Gay rights == | |||
Why has Ireland got a section on gay rights? I don't want to start an argument over gay rights but I don't see this on any other country article. Is this just a backlash of some sorts against the catholic church! ] (]) 02:07, 7 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
:It may be because (as you note) historically Ireland was "culturally conservative" in that area, and it may be that some editors believe that including it highlights a cultural change in the outlook on some issues. Possibly. Personally I'm not sure it's an appropriate yardstick/measure for social trends or the change to a more "liberal" or open society. But then maybe it's as good as any other. With regard to "why Ireland and not elsewhere". I suppose - possibly - it's because some editors believe the polls show Irish society to be more tolerant/accepting/aware/balanced/whatever than others. Again, I couldn't say one way or the other whether it's any more appropriate to include in the Ireland article than elsewhere. Certainly the main UK article doesn't mention it. Even though LGBT partnerships do have full legal equality there - way more demonstrative of a "progressive" outlook than a simple poll. Anyway. I don't see any reason to take it out. Unless it grows into something more extensive. At which point it should be moved to ]. ] (]) 21:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
== New City And Towns Template == | |||
I see a new template has been added to the article listing Ireland's towns and cities by population by ]. This brings the little known and slow moving Drogheda/Dundalk population dispute to the the main Ireland article. I didn't bother much when it was confined to ] and ] (see also asociated talk pages), but now that it's spilled over I'd like people to take a look at this <s>alarming</s> <s>grave</s> <s>minor</s> dispute. ] (]) 10:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Why do we even need this templatecruft when there ia a perfectly good list ] available instead of taking up so much space and adding more code to an already large page which is 92kb long? We should actually be reducing the page size not increasing it. ] (]) 14:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Hey relax i was just fowolling the list of ]<span style="border:3px solid #120A8F">]<font style="color:#0000;background:#0000"></font>]</span> 16:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
==What is this?== | |||
The table below I have removed from the article as it is hopelessly confused; some of the stats refer to counties, some to towns and the Dublin figure <s>is</s> was the figure for the GDA which actually includes many of the others on the list (eg Tallaght). And ] seems to have gone missing. ] (]) 22:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{Infobox largest cities | |||
<!--- Table title ---> | |||
| title = Cities and Towns of Ireland | |||
<!--- List header ---> | |||
| city_type = Greater Area | |||
| subdivision_type = County | |||
<!--- Central images ---> | |||
| image1 = Molly malone grafton street-edit2.jpg | |||
| image2 = Cork courthouse.jpg | |||
<!--- List ---> | |||
| city1 = Dublin City | |||
| city1_div = Co. Dublin | |||
| city1_pop = 1,004,185 | |||
| city2 = Cork City | |||
| city2_div = Co. Cork | |||
| city2_pop = 190,384 | |||
| city3 = Tallaght | |||
| city3_div = Co. Dublin | |||
| city3_pop = 103,301 | |||
| city4 = Limerick | |||
| city4_div = Co. Limerick | |||
| city4_pop = 90,778 | |||
| city5 = Galway | |||
| city5_div = Co. Galway | |||
| city5_pop = 72,729 | |||
| city6 = Waterford | |||
| city6_div = Co. Waterford | |||
| city6_pop = 49,240 | |||
| city7 = Drogheda | |||
| city7_div = Co. Louth | |||
| city7_pop = 35,085 | |||
| city8 = Swords | |||
| city8_div = Co. Dublin | |||
| city8_pop = 33,998 | |||
| city9 = Bray | |||
| city9_div = Co. Wicklow | |||
| city9_pop = 31,901 | |||
| city10 = Navan | |||
| city10_div = Co. Meath | |||
| city10_pop = 24,851 | |||
| city11 = Ennis | |||
| city11_div = Co. Clare | |||
| city11_pop = 24,253 | |||
| city12 = Tralee | |||
| city12_div = Co. Kerry | |||
| city12_pop = 22,744 | |||
| city13 = Kilkenny | |||
| city13_div = Co. Kilkenny | |||
| city13_pop = 22,179 | |||
| city14 = Carlow | |||
| city14_div = Co. Carlow | |||
| city14_pop = 20,724 | |||
| city15 = Naas | |||
| city15_div = Co. Kildare | |||
| city15_pop = 20,044 | |||
| city16 = Sligo | |||
| city16_div = Co. Sligo | |||
| city16_pop = 19,402 | |||
| city17 = Newbridge | |||
| city17_div = Co. Kildare | |||
| city17_pop = 18,520 | |||
| city18 = Mullingar | |||
| city18_div = Co. Westmeath | |||
| city18_pop = 18,416 | |||
| city19 = Wexford | |||
| city19_div = Co. Wexford | |||
| city19_pop = 18,163 | |||
| city20 = Letterkenny | |||
| city20_div = Co. Donegal | |||
| city20_pop = 17,586 | |||
<!--- Footnotes ---> | |||
| source = 2006 Census | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Ireland naming discussions}} | |||
{{annual readership}} | |||
{{old move|date=18 August 2024|destination=Ireland|result=not moved|link=Special:Permalink/1242461520#Requested move 18 August 2024}} | |||
{{archives|auto=yes|search=yes|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=1|units=month|index=/Archive index}} | |||
I think ] was given ]'s population figure? ]<sup>]</sup> 23:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | |||
|target=/Archive index | |||
|mask=/Archive <#> | |||
|leading_zeros=0 | |||
|indexhere=yes}} | |||
__TOC__ | |||
== Not the Republic of Ireland == | |||
:Looks like it. Surely we need to keep the Dundalk v. Drogheda issue out of here? ] (]) 23:09, 20 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
The name of Ireland is simply Ireland and not the Republic of Ireland. One may refer to the official list of countries from the United Nations or to the websites of the government of Ireland which both indicate this ] (]) 16:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Agreed on several counts. The table is vague in it's definitions of town/city boundaries - In some cases it includes the exact town or city boundaries. And in other cases takes "urban area" or "town + environs" numbers. As a result, its accuracy is a little uncertain, and it therefore has very limited value. Similarly, because of this "vagueness" it brings the (sometimes troublesome) question of "which town is bigger" into a new and unnecessary forum. And finally, there is no need for this type of table in this article. We already have lists such as ]. The main country article doesn't benefit from having this data hashed up and dumped here. (No matter how prettily packaged). ] (]) 23:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Yes everyone knows. However it's a natural disambiguator since the island is also called Ireland. There are very few country articles on Misplaced Pages that are actually at their official names. ] ] 17:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Just have "Ireland" become "Ireland (Island)" why would anybody be looking for the island of Ireland instead of the Ireland country when they search Ireland? ] (]) 21:47, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Its official description is "Republic of Ireland" which is used as ], see discussions at ]. In contrast "Republic of France" isn't common usage and the country is primary which is why we don't use the official description for France. ''']''' (]) 16:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Hi, well noted. However unlike the use of "Republic of France", "Ireland" is by the far the most common name used for the state in everyday use, both nationally (Ireland) and internationally (Europe, US and further a field). This is clearly demonstrated in the name of state in Misplaced Pages pages in other languages, for example Irish, German, French, and Dutch. There is little argument for the continued use of the "Republic of Ireland", it has no legal basis or no basis in everyday use. ] (]) 09:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::@]: How do you distinguish between the ], and the ]? You will see at ] which @] referred to above, that there have been several long discussions previously about this, but never a ] to change the articles' names. ] (]) 09:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::I know this has been discussed to death but surely putting the island to "Ireland (island)" and the country to "Ireland" would be the most accommodating arrangement? What are the cons? I think it makes sense that the country would take precedence over the geography (some examples I came up with: ] points to USA not the continent, ] points to the country not continent). ] (]) 20:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Why not the island as "Ireland" and the country to "Ireland (state)"? The island is likely the primary usage considering its existence throughout history and not just 100 and a bit years. ] ] 20:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Age isn't the primary factor in which page should take precedence. Notice how America and Australia have existed as continents for millennia and yet the country takes precedence. | |||
::::::You are making an assumption when you say the island is the primary usage. I checked the page statistics and while the island page is currently higher I reckon that's due to it currently being the primary as the patterns on both pages match up. This indicates to me that most views are expecting the country and clicking through to the country page rather than finding what they want on the island page (there is also the possibility of reading both pages). | |||
::::::As an Irish person I find it somewhat demeaning that you insist the island is the main page and relegate the country to being the secondary topic and clearly others feel this way also whereas moving the island page is generally inoffensive. ] (]) 21:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Completely agree, that the country should take precedence over the island. More times than not when people refer to Ireland they are referring to the country not the island. As mentioned before this is not the case for Misplaced Pages in other languages, and the current setup in English is confusing to say the least. ] (]) 09:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Do you have evidence for that that takes into account thousands of years of historical record before the country was formed? A huge proportion of the world doesn't actually realise there's a difference between Ireland the country and Ireland the island, and most overseas interactions with Ireland on a personal level are regarding the island historically and not the modern political state. As an Irish person I find it somewhat demeaning that people want to sweep aside the history of the island and say that it's only the modern state that is the important topic. ] ] 11:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::Cannot see how this is sweeping aside history. The modern country of Ireland is very much connected with its history, the country was not created in a vacuum. Struggling to see what your reason is to not call the country by its official name, and the name in which most people globally use (aside from the UK potentially). ] (]) 11:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::You're treating Ireland differently to all other countries though, we should treat them in the same manner either referring first to the Geographical landmass or the Nation, in which case many links '''Australia''', '''Britain''', '''America''', '''South Africa''' and more would need to be changed to make this consistent. A large part of the reason people ''don't'' understand there's a difference is due to poor inconsistent sourcing like this where Ireland is often referred to as part of "The British Isles" or otherwise which leads people to not understand the Country is different to the Island and to the UK. Either way we should be keeping this consistent between all searches and countries. ] (]) 16:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::By that moniker the countries listed would also need to be changed. ] (]) 16:12, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Hi, generally in Ireland and internationally both officially and informally when referring to the country "Ireland" is used and when referring to the island "Island of Ireland" is used. ] (]) 09:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Actually I meant "French Republic" but in any case although that may be the long official descriptive name I've never heard it used while I've always heard Ireland, the country called "Republic of Ireland" which specifically stated as being the official description. The French constitution doesn't appear to specify the country's long official descriptive name but more importantly is common usage. ''']''' (]) 18:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::There's a page on this at ] which is very detailed. | |||
::::As you are British you will commonly be exposed to "Republic of Ireland" in usage as that's the name British law has chosen to use but for people living in Ireland and the rest of the world this is not the case. The name for the UN, EU, Council of Europe, IMF and OECD is "Ireland". The only place "Republic of Ireland" is used as a name is for the soccer team and also notably this Misplaced Pages page. Google for "Ireland" and "Republic of Ireland" and notice the difference in the results. | |||
::::An "official description" is not a name, why are we supposed to use a description of the country as the title instead of its common and constitutional name? | |||
::::Only Brits commonly use the "Republic of Ireland" due to Northern Ireland being a common part of their discourse (and need to disambiguate for politics, travel, business) but other countries internationally assume Ireland to be the country or don't have a need for disambiguation so often. Normally if people want to refer to NI they say NI, it's only in the UK that people would ever assume "Ireland" to mean "Northern Ireland" and thus need to disambiguate. ] (]) 20:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Hi, irish person here, I regularly use the term "Republic of Ireland". I find it useful to use the term to differentiate between the country & the island. ] (]) 18:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Also, the constitution calls the country "The Republic of Ireland". ] (]) 18:39, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::It doesn't. Article 4 of Bunracht is pretty short and very clear. | |||
:::::::"The name of the State is Éire, or, in the English language, Ireland." ] (]) 19:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::The description of the country is separate to the name of the country. As per Article 4 of the Constitution, the name of the country in English is "Ireland". "Republic of Ireland" has no official status as a name. ] (]) 09:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::And not a single person here thinks otherwise. ] ] 11:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::You are indeed correct. Just wanted to ensure there was no equivalence given between description and official name. ] (]) 11:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Name of Border article == | |||
{{deindent}} Can I please ask those who are simply restating established facts, as if they are arguments, to realise that you're not going to "one and done" this discussion by doing so. It is acknowledged fact that Ireland is the name of the state (per the constitution). And that the Republic of Ireland is a description (per the Act). And that the island is also called Ireland (commonly and per the constitution). Etc. Simply restating these established facts (as a kind of "gotcha") is pointless. And does not address the issue that we cannot have two articles with the same title. Please argue your point on the basis of your proposal. And the relevant naming and disambiguation guidelines. For example, if you think that it should be "Ireland" and "Ireland (island)", then argue why the name of the state is (now) the ] (over the island). Or, if you think it should be "Ireland (state)" and "Ireland", then argue why a clunky/Wikipedia-only parenthetical disambiguator is preferred over the common, natural language and officially recognised descriptor. To the extent that ] should be overlooked. Stating things like "the state is called Ireland ", or "Republic of Ireland is a description not the official name ", is about as useful in progressing this discussion as quoting Pi to 10 decimal places. ] (]) 12:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
At ], I have proposed that the name be changed to comply with diplomatic protocol. Please comment. --] (]) 23:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
] (]) | |||
what with the polls mentioned, where most north protestants feel British, and only a very small minority (3%) actually considering themselves Irish, I would have to agree, this seems the most appropriate. if you think about it, arguments about calling it "Republic of Ireland" vs. "Ireland" are simply mimicking the great argument between north and south. Calling it "Ireland" would be speaking to the geography of the land, while "Republic of Ireland" would be speaking to the political boundaries of Southern Ireland. | |||
:Well noted. I would argue for the use of Ireland / Ireland (Island) over Ireland (Country) / Ireland, as the former is the primary use of the term. This is demonstrated by a Google search where the majority of results relate to the country not the island. The term for the island has limited use, namely the geographical use for the island and organisations that cover Ireland and Northern Ireland such as the Irish rugby team. All other uses relate to the country. ] (]) 14:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
I agree with Red King regarding this, because it discusses the politics of the Island & the politics of Britain. What better title than one that defines the politics? | |||
:Its the official description of the state, isn't that the point? When disambiguation is needed as it is on Misplaced Pages the description is appropriate but when it isn't such as when linking the country in the infobox of ] it is piped as "Ireland". Per ] if there is a term which is commonly used it can be used for natural disambiguation which seems appropriate here. ''']''' (]) 16:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
::We are talking about a name not a description. They should not be equated. Officially the state should never be referred to as the Republic Ireland, hence this element of the 1948 act is irrelevant to this discussion on the name. As suggested the terms Ireland and Ireland (Island) should be used instead, given Ireland the country is the primary use of the term and not the island. Furthermore this overcomes the confusion between both terms. ] (]) 18:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I would like to support Tom's recommendation (new account but please don't hold that against me) that the primary use of "Ireland" should refer to the country rather than the island. I've noted the discussion at this location and elsewhere that not all states are referred to by their official name in their URL, however, I would suggest Ireland is unique in being the only country on Misplaced Pages where its name is shared with a geographic feature and the geographic feature takes precedence. By way of example, the primary topic for Belize, Jordan, Moldova, Niger, Paraguay, Chad and Guinea all refer to the states rather than the geographic features that share their name, i.e. Belize River, Jordan River, Moldova River, Niger River, Paraguay River, Lake Chad and Gulf of Guinea respectively. I would suggest Ireland the state should be at https://en.wikipedia.org/Ireland and the island of Ireland should be at https://en.wikipedia.org/Ireland (island) or https://en.wikipedia.org/Island of Ireland. Most people in Ireland and Northern Ireland would use the phrase "Island of Ireland" if needing to make the distinction between the state and the island but I appreciate the URL is a touch unwieldy so the bracketed (island) version may be more appropriate. Moreover, I think, as Tom mentions, generally, throughout the world, the use of Ireland refers to the state; that's not to say in some contexts people wouldn't use Ireland to refer to the island but it's most definitely in the minority. Consider the use of Paraguay; if the primary Misplaced Pages topic was about the Paraguay River and it said (paraphrasing) "oh, you're looking for the state, that's over here", I think it would be considered odd, confusing and inconsistent. Using Republic of Ireland for the topic on the state named Ireland seems incorrect and a touch anachronistic when a more sensible and consistent solution is available. ] (]) 01:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Rivers and lakes are not a good example as most if not all rivers and lakes on Misplaced Pages take the form "Lake X" or "River X" and don't run in to the same problem as this article, there was never an intention to name the page "Paraguay River" as just "Paraguay". This is why I used the continents examples (], ]) which would be referred to in a way that conflicts with the country. Most island states seem to have just one article for both country and island from what I can find (even ] where the island has occupied territory). | |||
::::*] has an article for the island at ] but the state comes first. | |||
::::*] is the state, geography is at ]. | |||
::::*] is the state, geography is at ]. | |||
::::*] is the state, geography is at ]. | |||
::::There is a counter-example where ] is the geographical group and the state is at ] but this has differing factors in that it is a collection of islands and "Micronesia" contains islands than the just state ] (]) 08:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Noted on the rivers, lakes and gulfs @]. I suppose the point was to supplement other examples mentioned including your references to Australia and America and highlight that Ireland is perhaps the only topic which refers to a geographic feature in the primacy over a state of the same name. I agree that the country should be at Ireland and the island should be at Ireland (island). ] (]) 23:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::@] Misplaced Pages doesn't determine article titles based on what something should and should not be called officially, but what is commonly used and practical to an article's specific situation. That's the same reason that ] is still the main article for the country whose government would say you should only officially call it "Türkiye". | |||
:::As others have said, Wikipedians did know how each term was in use when the decision for the status quo was reached. If it's to be changed, there would need to be something new or not previously discussed. ] (]) 16:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::As has been explained multiple times in the thread the current title is neither an official name or a common name which makes it different from examples like Turkey where Turkey is a common name for the country. To say this argument is the same as a "use official name" discussion is a misrepresentation. ] (]) 16:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I feel that 'Ireland (island)' is clunky whereas 'Republic of Ireland' is an elegant disambiguation. So I'm opposed to change. ] (]) 08:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
::The discussion has moved on from the use of the Republic of Ireland as the name of the state, given this is not the official name and not the name in which most people refer to the country. The question is now which is the primary use of the term Ireland, the state or the island. From my viewpoint the answer is clearly the state. Any additional thoughts? ] (]) 10:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::What references and evidence do you have that the state is the primary usage whenever people say Ireland? ] ] 11:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Firstly if you look at Google Trends for searches globally over the last 5 years searches related to Ireland and country or state, are consistently higher than searches related to Ireland and island. Notwithstanding this, many of the top searches for Ireland and Island relate to River Island, Love Island or the islands of Ireland (such as Achill). Which can be further discounted from the searches related to Ireland and Island. | |||
:::::Secondly, if you consider on a world or European stage, Ireland refers to the country not the island. For example: IMF, OECD, EU, European Council and UN. This is also reflected in non governmental organisations such as the International Energy Agency, European Broadcasting Union, World Medical Association, International Committee of the Red Cross, and the International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies to name but a few. There are limited organisations that refer to the island like rugby and hockey. | |||
:::::Therefore, the evidence is clear that Ireland primarily refers to the country not the island. If you believe otherwise please put forward the evidence. ] (]) 15:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Sorry, ''what'' evidence would that be, exactly? You're just stating things, and claiming they're facts. They're not. If you're doing some sort of ] research, then share your links to your results. I'd love to see what search terms you're using that are bringing in "Love Island" and "River Island" as ''bona fide'' results for a search presumably using keywords along the lines of "Island of Ireland" or some variation thereof! ]<sup>]</sup> 09:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::I've yet to see any clear evidence that the island is the primary usage either, just it's longer history. Alas given the status quo, the burden of proof appears to fall on those wanting change. | |||
:::::My position is that using disambiguating parentheses is preferential as the current situation simply perpetuates the fallacy that the name of the country is "Republic Of Ireland" (both on Misplaced Pages and other sites that source their data from the wiki, an often overlooked side effect). | |||
:::::I'm sure long term editors are jaded by this topic arising every few months both here and historically at ], but I would ask this; if the names of the pages were to change, do you think there would be as much demand to revert to "Republic of" as there was to remove it? ] (]) 16:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I'm aware that 'Republic of Ireland' is not the name of the state. It is, however, the name of the Misplaced Pages page and I don't support changing to either 'Ireland (island)' or 'Ireland (state)'. 'Republic of Ireland' is fine in my view. ] (]) 11:27, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::That's a bit of a circular argument, this discussion is about the name of the Misplaced Pages page. If you feel the name of the page should be the Republic of Ireland, please put forward the reasons why. The evidence is pretty clear, globally Ireland is the name used both officially and colloquially by most organisations and people (see previous comments). The only exception to this is in the UK, in which Republic of Ireland is used frequently. That said the British Government officially refers to the country as Ireland not the Republic of Ireland. | |||
::::Finally, I do think that wishes of the country regarding its naming should be respected. It's not a name that is disputed like North Macedonia. To disregard the correct and preferred name is insensitive. ] (]) 15:26, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::"The wishes of the country" is a bit of a stretch, Tom. There are ''very'' few countries on Misplaced Pages that are actually at their official name. ]<sup>]</sup> 09:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::I think this argument that other countries aren't at their official names is flawed. In Ireland's case both the official and commonly used name are the same. All the examples people give are at the name people commonly use to refer to the country (], ], ], ], ] are the examples cited before) and are thus uncontroversial (I couldn't find any discussions trying to use the official names) but here we have a title that is both not the common or official name as the title. ] (]) 12:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::"To disregard the correct and preferred name is insensitive" "I do think that wishes of the country regarding its naming should be respected" I '''''am''''' irish, and I prefer the current name. So, you claiming that the wishes of the country are to be respected is just like a child on a playground saying "Call him stinkface, he told me to." ] (]) 18:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Sorry, I didn't want to be mean, just that's the best thing I could come up with. ] (]) 10:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I'm also opposed to this change. Contrary to what is being said about primary topic, when I google "Ireland": https://www.google.com/search?q=ireland+-wikipedia, only six of the top twenty hits relate to the republic. The rest relate to all-Ireland, the island or Northern Ireland. ] (]) 15:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
::This is anecdotal evidence, as your Google search is heavily influenced by your search history and location. My Google search returns much more website revering to the country not island. That's why I referenced Google Trends data in my previous comment. There are much more Google searches linked to the country/state than island globally over last 5 years (max time period). ] (]) 15:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::This is anecdote, Tom, as you haven't presented any evidence. ]<sup>]</sup> 09:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::If your argument is that people looking for the state are getting lost, that's an argument for making 'Ireland' a disambiguation page like ] surely? Then they can choose the state or the island from there. | |||
:::: | |||
:::But most of the arguments put forward seem more about emotion / nationhood which is not a good basis on which to make the change. ] (]) 15:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Apologies, if my previous comment was not clear. The Google Trends data relates to the number of search results not searches. There are more search results for Ireland that include country or state than island. I also mentioned most organisations globally refer to Ireland as the country not the island. It is incorrect to call these emotional arguments, if you have other evidence or arguments to contrary, please put them forward. ] (]) 16:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Also anecdotally of course (from a stateless browser in Canada), excluding Misplaced Pages, the top results I receive for a Google search for are: | |||
::- Tourism Ireland (ireland.com, all-island - weren't the Irish Times generous to give up this domain name!) | |||
::- Failte Ireland (discoverireland.ie, Ireland) | |||
::- Brittanica (britannica.com, Ireland) | |||
::- Irish Government (gov.ie, Ireland) | |||
::- Education in Ireland (educationinireland.com, Ireland) | |||
::- Department of Foreign Affairs (ireland.ie, Ireland) | |||
::- National Geographic Kids (kids.nationalgeographic.com, Ireland) | |||
::- National Gallery of Ireland (nationalgallery.ie, Ireland) | |||
::- Department of Foreign Affairs (dfa.ie, Ireland) | |||
::- The Irish Times (irishtimes.com, Ireland) | |||
::So, 9 out of 10 refer to the state rather than the island. Tourism Ireland is the only all-island result (again, for me, in Canada) in the top 10. Tourism Ireland is of course based in Ireland but promotes the entire island post Good Friday Agreement. Searches conducted from Ireland and the UK will likely not reflect what most of the world sees. ] (]) 23:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Contrary to what is being claimed here, google trends demonstrates more worldwide searches for the island rather than the country: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=now%201-d&q=%2Fm%2F03rt9,%2Fm%2F012wgb&hl=en-US. ] (]) 19:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I don't think there's any information to be extracted from that page, its unclear exactly how they determine which is which. All the related queries for both refer to the country and the graph is almost the exact same as well, the difference is minor ] (]) 19:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
::The link you shared does not fully work and the time period you searched is the past day. See below the link for worldwide results from 2004 to today for "Ireland Country + Ireland State" versus "Ireland Island''. Both Country and State are used as both are relevant words, the "+" acts as an or. As you can see Country/State is always higher than Island for the whole period since 2004. Additionally the top 3 results for Island relate to River Island so the island results can be discounted even further. | |||
::https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?hl=en-GB&tz=-180&date=all&q=Ireland+island,Ireland+country+%2B+Ireland+state&sni=6 ] (]) 05:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::That's a completely flawed methodology. You are ignoring that (I would imagine) for the vast majority of people putting "Ireland" into a search engine, we simply ''don't know'' whether they are looking for the state, or the island. The fact that "River Island" is a top result would suggest that Google Trends' results and algorithms have been as subject to enshittification as the rest of Google. ]<sup>]</sup> 09:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::I am afraid you don't understand how Google Trends data works. It shows how many results contain "Ireland" and "Island", in any order. This is not how many people searched these terms. The top results for these terms indicate the top searches that included terms "Ireland" and "Island" in search results. In this case the top 3 searches were related to retail chain River Island, which for this discussion whether "Ireland" primary usage is the island or the country is irrelevant. These results are made up of people searching for River Island (mostly likely in Ireland) and getting the terms Ireland and island included in their results. Hence based on Google search results there are much more results related to the country than the island. ] (]) 10:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::The top 5 searches for "Ireland country + Ireland state" relate to country code and Northern Ireland. That is no more relevant than River Island. The data and your claims about it are unconvincing. ] (]) 11:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::The top search is "country of Ireland", 3 of the other top 5 searches relate to country code which likely refers to the phone country code (+353), and 1 of the the top 5 results relate to NI. Hence the majority of the top 5 searches relating to "country" are relevant while the majority of the top 5 island searches are irrelevant (i.e. River Island). ] (]) 13:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
The articles are fine at their current respective homes. In my opinion, as a disambiguator is needed, the natural one is the state's official description. Most states on WP do not have articles at their official name - it's really no biggie. No offense is intended. The vast majority don't take any. (The decision to stop using ] may well have been premature...) ]<sup>]</sup> 09:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Please put forward evidence why you think the island is the primary use of the term Ireland, not the country. I have put forward evidence above based on Google Trends data and how the vast majority of organisations (in all fields: government, arts, medicine, charity etc) globally refer to the country not the island when they use the term Ireland. ] (]) 10:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
-Crystal Sage | |||
:Please stop referring to the description as per the 1948 Act, you are misunderstanding its use. It should be never used as a name. ] (]) 10:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
] (]) <small>—Preceding ] comment was added at 18:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:: For the record: I would support ''''Ireland'''' for the country name and ''''Ireland (island)'''' for the geographical page. This brings it into line with usage elsewhere, as covered well enough above. I am concerned that Wiki is perpetuating the common misconception that 'Ireland' is the island. As a young Brit whose Dad served in the British Army in Belfast back in the Troubles, I recollect the passionate view at the time that the Republic should not be permitted to appropriate the formerly British-owned term, 'Ireland', and for a while it was Eire. I now feel that the colonial view of Ireland is carried on by Wiki these days and that we should all move on. The name of a country should be what its inhabitants say it is. There was a referendum, we Brits lost. Time we accepted that. ]]<small><sup><i>(])</i></sup></small> 10:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::"the common misconception that 'Ireland' is the island." Um... Ireland ''is'' the island. It doesn't have another name. (And one day, the state will also share the same territory). ]<sup>]</sup> 12:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Please stop telling me what to do. I am misunderstanding nothing, including how Google Trends works. As I stated, your premise - "Ireland+island,Ireland+country+%2B+Ireland+state" - is flawed from the get-go. Now, we've both had our say. Let's not ] the process, and listen to some other opinions. ]<sup>]</sup> 10:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Title of Wiki page incorrect == | |||
:I agree @] that a disambiguator is needed but in my opinion, Ireland (island) is a better solution than using the description and not the common, and indeed official, name of the country, Ireland, when referencing the state. You state that most articles do not appear at their official name but almost none appear at their full description, e.g. there don't seem to be topics on "Federal Republic of Germany", "The Commonwealth of Australia", "The Kingdom of the Netherlands" or "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"; presumably because it's unwieldy and these states are not commonly known by their full descriptions. @] raises this point elsewhere that Ireland seems to be somewhat unique in that neither the common nor official name is in use. Referring to the state as Republic of Ireland is not incorrect but refusing to refer to the state as Ireland has deep political connotations, specifically, many UK governments refused to use the term Ireland until post-Good Friday Agreement some 40 years after the name was adopted and Sinn Féin still refuse to use the term, i.e. a refusal to refer to the state correctly as Ireland is particularly common, although not exclusively, amongst the more extreme political ideologies of the Irish left and the British right. ] (]) 18:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{Outdent|:}}How about modifying the first sentence to clarify the name per the article text: | |||
The title of the Wiki page should be "Ireland" - as explained in the main article. The title "Republic of Ireland" is incorrect. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 10:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
{{Quotebox|text= | |||
==Garda== | |||
'''Ireland''' (English) and {{langx|ga|''']'''}} {{IPA|ga|ˈeːɾʲə||Eire_pronunciation.ogg}} are the official names of the country also officially described as '''Republic of Ireland''' ({{lang|ga|Poblacht na hÉireann}}),<!--{{Efn|name=nomenclature}}-->, a country in north-western Europe...}} | |||
Best wishes, ] (]) 14:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Requested move 18 August 2024 == | |||
==Hatnote== | |||
A hatnote has been added to ], the work on just one editor: ]. I don't think the new hatnote to a list deserves any greater prominence than any other list already in the current "See also" section. Is this an attempts to replace the much older and much more comprehensive ] that has been around since early 2004 and if anything that should be the hatnote? Besides which, we certainly don't need both, essentially duplicate, lists. Any other opinions? ] (]) 04:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
: You summarized the ] well: it is ''more comprehensive''. The ] on the other hand is intended to be a general overview of the subject, much like the main article ], but focused on links instead of prose. Unlike the more comprehensive list, it is intended to be an outline and is less index-like because of its scope (its scope is limited, whereas the related-topics list is not and has the potential to grow much much larger - see the Japan example below). Another difference is that the basic list is a member of a set of such lists (one for every country of the world) currently under construction. They are coming along nicely, and share a common format. See the rest at ]). | |||
<div class="boilerplate mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #efe); color: var(--color-base, #000); margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted var(--border-color-subtle, #AAAAAA);"><!-- Template:RM top --> | |||
: The two lists in the set that are the most complete are ] and ] (notice the format of the more comprehensive ]). Please help to complete the ] to this high standard. Thank you. ''''']''''' 04:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:''The following is a closed discussion of a ]. <span style="color: var(--color-error, red);">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a ] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.'' | |||
The result of the move request was: '''not moved.''' There is a clear consensus against moving. <small>(])</small> ] (]) 14:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Hi Transhumanist. You appear to have added this "hatnote" convention to several country articles, and in doing so have created a kind of new "standard" for country related lists, and a new standard for header formats for country articles. Did you discuss this anywhere before going ahead and making changes accross so many articles? Personally I'm with Ww2censor. I don't really see what value is added by these lists. Many articles already have navboxes, "]" style nav templates and other devices to link users to the relevant "sub-articles". I don't see the value in superceding all of those with your new format. Any nods to ] before you did all this? ] (]) 10:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
] → {{no redirect|Ireland}} – This is technically a request for two moves: ] to ] and merging the current ] article into ] (or temporarily moving it to ]). I'm uncertain if this discussion would be better suited to a broader project talk page, which is why I'm making this proposal here. I am aware of ], that decided to leave the articles on their current titles, but that was simply 15 years ago and there are good reasons for both moving and keeping. However, from what I can see, the reasons to move both articles seem to be predominant. Given the frequency of discussions, it is clear that many editors have made significant efforts on ] to move this article, challenging the incorrect assumption by some editors that there is no reason to believe consensus could have changed over the past decade and a half. | |||
::: There's no new standard. Yet. It's just a test run. Of the 200+ county articles, I only changed the hatnote on about 20. We should see if the links actually get used - if you don't object, that is. I plan to use the hit counter to check those list articles over the next few weeks, to see if their traffic goes up. For curiosity's sake, if nothing else. If the traffic doesn't go up, then the links are useless and should be removed. I haven't sought consensus yet, because there's no data yet to bring to a discussion. If you'd like to reduce the number of test links to 10, that would be fine with me, but I figured since there are 20 completed lists, we might as well run the test on all of those (more data that way, and a test group of only 10 seems kind of scant - 20 seems about right). I look foward to your thoughts and ideas. ''''']''''' 22:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Be that as it may, I don't see that there should be any preference to a list as a hatnote over and above the prominence given to any other link in the "see also" section, so I suggest moving it there, as there is no agreement to having a hatnote on the page. You can still observe its popularity from there. ] (]) 23:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Requested move== | |||
I'm suggesting we move this article to ]. This move will move the article to | |||
*the countries offical name and not a discription of the state | |||
*the countries common name | |||
*Will satisfy ] | |||
*Remove the need to pipe link <nowiki> ]</nowiki> ] (]) 15:51, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
"Republic of Ireland" is neither an official term nor is it ], except in Ireland itself and , thus eliminating it as an option. . the official English name of the country is, as pointed out by other editors, simply "Ireland". On Misplaced Pages, we either use the short forms for countries (], ], ], or ]) or we use the official name if it is already a single and concise term (], ], ], ]). It is clear that this situation falls into the latter category, which also aligns with ]. | |||
:While I agree it is the correct thing to do, we should wait on this discussion until more info comes to light from the IMOS discussion.] 15:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
'''Comment''' the Discussion at IMOS is going around in circles , this RM will either solve the naming issue or the pipe link issue , which will allow greater focus on the remaining issue ] (]) 15:59, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
To avoid the use of parentheses, as seen in ], we need to move the article about the island. Taking a glimpse at other island countries like ] or ], which also occupy their respective short forms, it appears that "Geography of ..." is the established form to describe the underlying island on which the country is located (], ]). Since ] redundantly addresses the politics of its constituent countries—topics that are already covered in their respective articles—I suggest merging it with ] by removing all sections that go beyond the island of Ireland as their subject matter and incorporating all remaining subtopics, such as geological history, into the article ]. Any disambiguation pages don't have to be changed. –] (]) 13:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Disagree''' -- "Ireland (state)" is not "the countries offical name and not a discription of the state" nor is it "the countries common name" as claimed. "Ireland (state)" is a[REDACTED] disambiguation whilst we have the perfectly ''official description'' '''Republic of Ireland'''. ] (]) 16:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*'''Comment''' , ''official description'' so lets move ] to ]] (]) 16:13, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*'''Disagree''' - while '''Ireland''' is the official declared name of the state it carries a political connotation. It is better to use the official state description as provided for in Ireland's own '''Republic of Ireland Act 1949'''.] (]) 16:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:: '''Comment''' You need to be consistent Thunderer, if you want to go back to that act, then we need to also take that period's position on Northern Ireland/Six Counties. We need to move on from old disputes and be consistent. --] <small>]</small> 22:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*'''Comment''' What '' political connotation'' seems like your ] to me, care to ]? ] (]) 16:13, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
**''Comment'' how about you proving that "Ireland (state)" is "countries offical name and not a discription of the state" and "countries common name"? ] (]) 16:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
**I thought it wasn't the countries common name as you claimed above is it now? ] (]) 16:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I've always called it the Free State or the South. That's not out of disrespect, these are the names commonly used in the circles I grew up in - which were of mixed ethnicity.] (]) 16:27, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*Note that there have been at least 25 discussions of the title since the poll linked above, so although many were closed early, the question has been revisited many times in the last 15 years. Most of the move discussion outcomes are compiled at ]. ]<small>]</small> 13:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Of course it has a political connotation. Please don't insult my intelligence or your own Gnevin by asking me to prove it. We'd be here for a year and still not come to agreement. That's what happens over everything with Ireland, north & south. I'm not here to change the world, I'm just espousing common sense. Djegan, I happen to agree that the country's name is Ireland and believe their own 1937 Act is sufficient proof. That's what I mean about argument however - we could still be at this in a year.] (]) 16:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
* There is no need to go back 15 years to find a discussion, there is one still on this page above. ] (]) 13:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Are we talking about the country or the state here; thats what confuses people. Nobody denies that "Ireland" is the name of the country (in the broad sense) - but the state is something different, even though it is also officially "Ireland". Using the same for country and state is a nonsense. The states official discription is "Republic of Ireland" - and using that makes good sense. ] (]) 16:22, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*:I know, from what I can tell, the 2009 discussion was the initial talk about this topic. –] (]) 14:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*::That 2009 discussion was the result of the previous dozen move discussions that resulted in ] in 2008. ]<small>]</small> 14:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
: |
:I agree with this suggestion for the most part. My only addition would be that some content might also have to be moved to ] ] (]) 14:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
::That is a good point, not all information are suitable for just the geography. –] (]) 15:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
* What evidence is there that the country of Ireland, a state that has existed for just over 100 years and doesn't occupy all of the island, is the primary subject here instead of the island? Why can't the country be at Ireland (country) and leave the island at Ireland? Is there evidence that when people say Ireland they're genuinely talking about the country and not the island and what exists in it, and not mixing the two up as is very commonplace? ] ] 15:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I agree.] (]) 16:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*:This is a good counterproposal, and I '''support this as Option B'''. ] (]) 16:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:What is the difference between the state and the country? We do use ''Republic of Ireland'' when describing what kind of government the state of Ireland has. Just like the US is a federal republic. But it's blue and wet is a description of a thing named water not its name ] (]) 16:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*:There is no hard evidence because we don't have access to all statistics, but there are indicators. For example, let's consider the average monthly page views of countries versus their respective islands in the cases of Taiwan and Cyprus according to the page view statistics: ] (~ 420.000 views) vs ] (~ 13.000 views) and ] (~ 230.000 views) and ] (~ 10.000 views). This suggests that states are far more searched for than the islands they occupy and I don't see a reason why this should be different for Ireland. In ] (~ 260.000 views) and ] (~ 200.000 views), Ireland's views are overall slightly higher than those of the Republic of Ireland. | |||
:The difference is six counties - jaysus man surely you knew that?] (]) 16:29, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*:Since we don't have access to referral sources, we can't say anything for sure, but given the numbers, we can assume that a vast majority of the Republic of Ireland's views originate from the disambiguation hatnote on the Ireland page. People likely enter "Ireland" in the search bar as for "Republic of Ireland", are directed to the article about the island, realise the article isn't about the state, and then click on the link in the lead to reach the country’s page. This would fit the difference of around 60.000 views with most likely a few visitors that closed the tab after reaching the article of the island. | |||
*:Given the lack of complete clarity, I would suggest aligning this case with similar topics like those mentioned earlier: ] or ] as well as ] or ]. These all follow the pattern where the state is the main article, with an article about the island under "Geography of...". | |||
*:I don't entirely disagree with your suggestion to move it to ], but I think the parentheses can be avoided here, and it would be better to do so if possible. –] (]) 18:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*::That is just ] and as we all know, Misplaced Pages cannot be used as a reference and that includes page hits. It's pure supposition that that's what's happening. ] ] 22:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:::OR requires unproven page content and does not include page hits as a statistical and automated process to be recorded, regardless of the source. The numbers from Misplaced Pages align with external search and book statistics, making it unlikely for the hypothesis to be completely incorrect. However, since we are discussing an assumption, I have written a few other paragraphs in case you did not notice. –] (]) 06:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''' per ], ] (including ]) and per ] (which I wrote years ago, in terms of the merger of the island article). As has previously been discussed "Republic of Ireland" is an official description and is in common usage unlike say ]. Georgia isn't comparable becauase the long name may not be official or at least isn't common usage, see ]. Cyprus and Taiwan aren't comparable as in those cases the countries cover similar areas to the islands which isn't the case for Ireland where Northern Ireland covers a significant amount of the area and population. ''']''' (]) 17:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:Oh, ] isn't only comparable, but rather nearly the identical issue, a country without a long official form, only difference is that there is no made-up name that is used as an article title and there is a U.S. state with the same name. ] you mentioned supports my point, I'm just wondering why you think that this is any different than in this case. The idea of moving Georgia to a made-up name was vastly rejected. Here, we got the identical situation in reverse, with a made-up name already applied and my idea is to move it back to it's real, official, and more common name. I opened the discussion with those very guidelines you mentioned. ] requires a name that is not made-up, "Republic of Ireland" is a made-up name as it isn't broadly accepted (remember, globally, not only within the UK and Ireland) and not the official name either if we stick to the UN, which is probably the best way to determine, whether a term for a state is official or not. In this case, it is definitly not official unless you can not offer clear evidence for the claim that it is. ] contradicts your reasoning as well; "Ireland" is way more common than "Republic of Ireland", throughout the article as well as , and by "way more", I mean more than fifty times as much. | |||
*:When you say that Cyprus isn't comparable, I just got one question for you: have you ever looked at a map of Cyprus showing the area of Northern Cyprus? This is exactly the same, we got two different states on one island; "Northern (island name)" on one hand and just "(island name)" on the other. Otherwise, I don't understand why this should be different; maybe you can explain this idea a little further? –] (]) 18:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*::Except that Republic of Ireland is not a made up name, it's in fact an official descriptor of the country. The constitution of the country gave us a natural disambiguator. And Republic of Ireland is indeed used, just ask the football team. And it's in use by the government of Ireland as a simple search across the government websites shows. It's not some made up term that is only used by the British or some such. ] ] 22:24, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:::Need I remind you that it was FIFA that imposed that name on the Football Association of Ireland team in 1953? ] (]) 07:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*::::You needn't, because we're not talking about the football team, we're talking about the island, and the state, which our government said could be officially described as 'the Republic of Ireland', in the Republic of Ireland Act, 1948. ]<sup>]</sup> 10:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:::Are you really asking me to consult the local football team while simultaneously claiming, without any statistical indicator, that it was common outside the UK and Ireland? –] (]) 07:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:"Republic of Ireland" is not tue common name. Globally "Ireland" is the common name for the country. ] (]) 18:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''' for the reasons I have stated ]: in brief summary, the ''status quo'' works because 1) "Optimising for readers over editors" precludes use of artificial construct disambiguators such as Ireland (state), Ireland (island). 2) The ''island'' of Ireland is known as - well, "Ireland". In the English language, it does not have '''any''' alternative common name or description. ] can therefore be claimed by the article on the island. 3) Using "Republic of Ireland" for the state doesn't allow the state to reside at a page called by its official name - but so what? ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]. 4) Not only has there never been a ] to move ] to ], there is demonstrable consensus to '''retain''' the ''status quo''. That's visible in the many, many polls taken prior to the 2009 poll, ''and'' in the ones since. My country's article isn't at its official name? So what. There are ] on Misplaced Pages. Only 30 of them are at their official name. The ''status quo'' '''works'''. Tobias is, with the best will in the world, proposing a whole heap of work, for many editors, that ultimately doesn't benefit the reader. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:Not really a consensus, just more seasoned editors shoot it down each time. Just because it's the status quo doesn't make it correct, otherwise this topic wouldn't get restarted monthly.] (]) 19:26, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*::Yes, a consensus, really. Click on the link in my post. Scroll down a bit. Read the poll results. I've done that work, you can do the rest - all the ones since, up until last year, should be on the ] talk page. It's absolutely ''not'' "just more seasoned editors shooting it down each time." It is, quite often, more seasoned editors saying "Here's why the ''status quo'' works, but sure, consensus can change, do you have any new arguments?" - and there aren't any. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:::Oh, I've read it all. And I've seen that "consensus can change" line many time. ] (]) 20:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:Since I already answered most of this points in this discussion, I'll keep it short: short forms are no official names, but no made-up names either, so absolutely valid to use in terms of concision - "Republic of Ireland" is neither concise nor legally existing at all. | |||
*:There is a alternative to "Ireland", actually two: "Ireland (island)" and "Geography of Ireland". Both of them are common on WP with the latter option being predominantly used. –] (]) 20:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*::Wait, what now? 'Republic of Ireland {{tpq|is neither concise nor legally existing at all.}}', where's that coming from? I refer you to the Republic of Ireland Act. 'Republic of Ireland' is the official, legal description of the state. Which you would know if you'd read the articles in question, or the previous move debates. As a relatively inexperienced editor, editing outside your normal areas of interest, I'd suggest doing your research before making proposals from a position of ignorance, especially in controversial areas. ]<sup>]</sup> 09:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:::What don't you understand about the difference between an official description and an official name? We're not seeking a description of the state's cultural or political identity, but rather an internationally recognised official term that aligns with UN records. According to them, this is not the official name and therefore , regardless of the country declaring it its official description. And before you want to use that as an argument: yes, the UN also acknowledge short forms like "" instead of "Republic of Poland", this is no deviation of an official form. –] (]) 07:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*::::Let me express this in words of no more than <strike>two</strike>three syllables. We passed a law that states the country's official description. '''That makes it legal.''' A UN style guide doesn't negate or override that. ]<sup>]</sup> 13:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:::::That still doesn't make a description a name. –] (]) 14:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*::But ] isn't about the geography of the island. The section on the union with Britain is longer than the entire geography section. ] (]) 08:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:::It is about the physical island, not a state on it. That's why economy, culture, and politics are misplaced here—they belong in the articles of the respective states, meaning this article and ]. –] (]) 13:51, 21 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:'''Oppose''' - "Republic of Ireland" ''is'' an official term, while it is not the name of the state, it is the "official description" of the state. That being said, we don't use official names here simply because they're official. Merging the existing ] article into ] is simply a non-starter as there is far more content in the former article than just about the island's geography. To have the country at the basename it would have to be the ], which is impossible to prove considering we have no way of determining whether searches for ] are for the country or the whole island. And yes, therein I could see an argument for a ] with the basename as a dab and the two articles existing as ]/Republic of Ireland and ], but the whole island has the long-term significance (PT2) by default imo, and unless PT1 can be proven to favor the country, I see no reason to change the existing arrangement. ] (]) ] 02:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
::There is a method to evaluate ], switch to a disambiguation page for a set period of time, after which the traffic to each can be evaluated to determine which topic readers are actually looking for. ] (]) 07:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:'''Oppose''' long term significance goes to the island itself. The ] has just as much a claim to primacy, if not a greater one, than the modern Irish republic. ] (]) 05:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:'''Oppose''' The current arrangement is sensible. The name "Republic of Ireland" is well-known and frequently used to distinguish the country from the broader island. ] (]) 06:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:'''Comment''' I couldn't help notice that the proposer recently flagged what they identified as problems on another article, and when asked to help with the cleanup they proposed, they responded with {{tpq|Great to hear that. I would love to help, but I currently don't have the time or motivation to rewrite the entire page.}} 🙄 ]<sup>]</sup> 10:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Congratulations, and ... what now? That has absolutely nothing to do with this and maintenance hatnotes exist to point out specific flaws until they are addressed, they to not obligate the flagger to participate in the correction, if that is what you're trying to say. –] (]) 05:40, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose'''. While the country is indeed commonly known as Ireland, it is not primary over the island. And it is also very commonly known as the Republic of Ireland or simply "the Republic", so the current title is very good natural disambiguation. -- ] (]) 10:39, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:'''Oppose:''' Oh no, not again! Oppose per previously reasons I've given in several other discussions as well as all the reasons given by other editors above, so there is no need to repeat them all here. Moving this to ] is just not thinking what that article is actually about. This is a dead topic, just leave it be, it works as it is. ] (]) 10:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''': I think the current title is appropriate. It's widely recognized and easily understood. ]] 14:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''': Would introduce needless confusion and become factually incorrect. ] (]) 14:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:@] How would it be "factually incorrect"? ] (]) 16:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*::Must confess to being curious about that one myself. ] ] 19:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:::Because legally there the Island of Ireland consisting of the Republic of Ireland and the North of Ireland. ] (]) 23:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*::::"North of Ireland"? That's a very creative one, I have to admit. Unfortunately for you, they are legally known as "Ireland" and "Northern Ireland". –] (]) 05:46, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''' per above, plus if this were to occur, we would have to say "Northern Ireland is not part of Ireland". The republic currently doesn't cover the entire island of the same name, and the island has long-term significance. The current arrangement is probably the best alternative option for the two "Ireland" subjects until political events change the situation. ''']]''' 14:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose move and ] close.''' This has been discussed to death. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 20:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''' It appears that it is ]. But in my opinion, such a move would only cause confusion. The current set up works because it helps distinguish between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland and the island itself is covered separately. And I'm also of the opinion that we should maintain the status quo when things are working. <span style="font:'Pristina'">]</span><span style="font:'Pristina'"><sup>]</sup></span> 11:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:What leads you to assume that this would only cause confusion in the case of a move? I understand your reasoning, but we don't have templates like ] or ] here on WP just to decorate our body text. –] (]) 12:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''' No reason to change, and lots of reasons not to change at this point. If I say my ancestors came from ], but they arrived in the 1800s, current naming is correct. --] (]) 17:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:Even after a possible move, it will not be any less correct. The island remains the island, no matter what the title of the article is. –] (]) 18:38, 20 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Merge ] into ]'''. The proposed move doesn't really work because the ] article is about much more than geography- it's also about the culture and the nation in general- but thinking about it, there are issues with the current status quo. ] and ] are largely duplicates for instance; if people seeking information about the government as well as general culture of Ireland come across this article or the other one, the information will inevitably be split. The scope of ] also isn't clear- the article currently starts with "Ireland is an island" but the article clearly covers the whole of the 32 counties, including small offshore islands. I don't think it's impossible to combine the articles in an easily-understandable way, whilst being clear that the sovereign state does not have sovereignty over the whole of Ireland. ] <sup>(], ])</sup> 22:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
::That's the difference between Island and State ] (]) 16:31, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*:Strong disagree. There's a clear distinction between the island that has been populated for millennia and the modern country that has only existed since 1922. It's also perfectly common for there to be some duplication of information across articles about related topics. Besides, equating the Republic of Ireland with the island of Ireland would be walking into a political minefield. ] (]) 05:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Therein lies the problem however. Using the name Ireland for the state implies that it IS the whole island, which is exactly what it's supposed to imply. Common sense must prevail.] (]) 16:34, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*::No one is suggesting equating the country of Ireland with the island of Ireland, just using it's official and ] for the countries article. | |||
::::No it doesn't. No more that ROI implys that .] (]) 16:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::: |
*::@] makes a point others have made before, the ] article is nebulous and isn't distinct. The content of the article is not limited in scope to the island of Ireland but rather the nation as an abstract concept, covering it's geography, history & politics etc. ] (]) 09:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
::: |
*:::But you can talk about the geography, history, and politics of the whole island in a way distinct from those of the Republic of Ireland specifically. Besides, "Republic of Ireland" ''is'' a common name and an official one under the Republic of Ireland Act 1948. ] (]) 11:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
*::::No, it is not an official name, just an official description, and it is not commonly used outside of the British Isles. The history of Ireland inevitably overlaps with the history of this article, as does its politics and demographics, since the country occupies the majority of the island's area. Everything else is included in ]. –] (]) 11:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::If that were true I would agree however the nation didn't pick the name as we all know. The Long Fella didn't give people choices like that.] (]) 16:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*:::::"it is not an official name, just an official description" That sounds like a distinction without a difference. | |||
:::::::::And that matters to wiki, why? Article 4 ,is my final word on this ! ] (]) 16:57, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*:::::"it is not commonly used outside of the British Isles" Yes it is. I live outside the British Isles, and I use it. | |||
*'''Oppose'''. Of course it is sometimes called Ireland and sometimes Republic of Ireland, but why move it to an unnatural disambiguation when it's already located at its natural and the most common disambiguation name, the name just about everyone inside and outside of Ireland uses? Strange proposal. ] (<small>]</small>) 16:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*:::::] (]) 11:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:If this was was ] name it should be at ] or ] per DAB .] (]) 16:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*::::::There is a difference between a personal experience and a . clearly show only a small peak in frequency within the British Isles, primarily in Ireland itself, with no indication of common usage outside Britain whatsoever. The difference between an official name and a description is that an official name is internationally accepted and recorded in UN files. A description is nothing more than a national designation used to display the form of government or cultural identity and has no international significance at all. –] (]) 12:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Which looks absolutely daft and in my opinion is disrespectful to the people and government of Ireland and that MUST be avoided at all costs.] (]) 16:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*:::::::Those data actually show usage of the term "Republic of Ireland" outside the British Isles. They support my position, not yours. The rest of your comment is hair-splitting. The fact remains that Dublin itself has endorsed the term "Republic of Ireland" in Irish legislation. ] (]) 12:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
::More silliness. Sigh. ] (]) 16:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*::::::::No, 'Republic of Ireland' remains unofficial as a name, according to the UN and the Irish constitution, and is uncommon as we clarified several times above. Of course, every term is used everywhere at some point, even Russian in Spain, but the usage outside the British islands is absolutely insignificant in comparison. You're just trying to distort clear facts to fit your opinion. –] (]) 12:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::What's silly about it? As far as I can see one of the major issues here are people with very avid, fundamental views and that is leading to disrespect and lack of good faith. In my opinion we should remove that from any discussion.] (]) 17:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*:::::::::You keep repeating this, and you continue to be wrong. As previously pointed out to you, the Republic of Ireland Act of 1948, passed by the Oireachtas and signed into law, designates "Republic of Ireland as the official description of the state. What the UN says in a style guide is neither here nor there. Please desist from continuing to spread misinformation. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::I was responding to the proposal "it should be at ] or ]" -- isn't that just another way of proposing ]? Especially given the use of capital R in republic? ] (]) 17:13, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*:::::::::: of the Constitution of Ireland couldn't be clearer, the name of the country, in English, is "Ireland". That's an indisputable fact. | |||
*::::::::::If anyone is spreading misinformation it's Misplaced Pages, as by maintaining the status quo it perpetuates fallacy that the name of the country is the "Republic of Ireland". | |||
*::::::::::This debate does not exist anywhere else as every country, official body (except for FIFA) and reference work accepts that the name of the country is "Ireland". ] (]) 15:08, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:::::::::::I don't really see anyone making the claim that Republic of Ireland is actually the official name (or a name) of the country, only that it's the official description and is therefore a useful natural disambiguator for uses of the word Ireland. We all know the name of the country in English is Ireland, that's not in dispute. However, as has been shown, even the Irish government uses the term Republic of Ireland in documentation etc. to refer to the country when a disambiguator is required while also talking about the island of Ireland. When the government of the country in question sometimes uses the term for such purposes, who are we to argue against that? People seem to operate under the clearly false impression that the term isn't used inside the country, when it is. ] ] 15:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*::::::::::::100% agree, the name of "Ireland" and description as "Republic of Ireland" are facts of law and shouldn't be up for debate. (Despite a number of contributions to the contrary) | |||
*::::::::::::I'll maintain a description is not a name, but more importantly I have yet to find another other reference work or list of countries maintained by an official body (except for FIFA) that use the prefix "Republic of". Misplaced Pages is the outlier. The overwhelming evidence shows that "Ireland" is the ] used the world over, while opposition to moving the article is based on reluctance change and ... vibes. ] (]) 15:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*::::"Republic Of Ireland" is the common name of the soccer team, "Ireland" is the common name of the country, island and Kim Basinger's daughter. | |||
*::::The name of the country is very clear, it is literally of the constitution and is the accepted common name by every international organisation (UN, EU, World Bank, UK Government). Alongside Misplaced Pages, the BBC is one of the few sources that commonly doesn't use the official name due to their . ] (]) 11:50, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:::::It's obvious that we're going in circles here, so I'm just going to note that this proposal has yielded a clear majority in favour of the status quo. ] (]) 12:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose'''. The discussion here keeps revolving around official name, but that is not the reason for the current article title or a valid reason to change it. ] (]) 15:42, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Moral support'''. This is likely to fail, but I'm somewhat surprised by the strong opposition to the move. "Ireland" is the common name for the country, and most if not all sources refer to it solely as that. ~~ ] (]) 15:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:The problem is, that's not the only thing reliable sources refer to as Ireland. The ], for example, happened in ] significantly before ] became a country. There's a whole lot of history that happened in Ireland before 1922/1937.--] (]) 17:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*::Every historical period has its own designation. In the case of the ], it occurred during a time when the country was referred to as ]. While it is possible to refer to the geographical area of any past event, this approach is often imprecise, even though I agree that this does not pertain to the modern-day state of Ireland. However, if no distinct name exists for a specific period, ] would be the preferred option rather than referring solely to the island itself. Short forms are used to describe modern-day countries on Misplaced Pages, even when significant historical periods might be more prominent than the current state (e.g. ], ], and ] refer to the modern-day countries rather than the ], ], or ], let alone the islands or geographical regions they once occupied). Short forms tend to encompass the entire history of a particular area (e.g. ], ], or ]). However, if there is a risk of confusion, disambiguation hatnotes can resolve the issue, as they currently do. –] (]) 18:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''' because it's been discussed many times and no new arguments have been made. Seems this is the least bad way to do things. This problem is likely to disappear in the next few years with Irish reunification so it's especially not worth getting exercised about. ] (]) 13:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support''' per the ] 😉 ]'']'' 18:29, 24 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Comment''' - How can the page be moved, when we already have an article named ], for the island? You have to have an RM for both articles, not just for the country. ] (]) 15:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*:That's the reason why I addressed it in the proposal. –] (]) 19:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*::The island article would have to be changed to "Ireland (island)". Anyways, I don't see either article being moved, anytime soon. ] (]) 19:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: var(--color-error, red);">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from ] --> | |||
*'''Support''' - there is no other option other than using simply Ireland as the title with Ireland (island) as the dab for the geographical entity. The argument that the common and legal and internationally recognised name of a country can't be used on Wiki because it carries "political connotations" is mind-boggling in its implications for the names of Wiki-articles well beyond these islands. (The first of which would be, thankfully, the end of the term "British Isles"). ] (]) 16:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
</div><div style="clear:both;" class=></div> | |||
::There's the current option and that's good enough.] (]) 16:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::No - it is contrary to Wiki policy. Maybe we should rename "Israel" to "The Zionist Entity" because the name is political? ] (]) 16:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::There is similar disagreement over the name Israel. I fear that's not a good example. As you are aware though there are many who would prefer to see the ROI called something else and certainly YOU might agree that Northern Ireland is not properly named.] (]) 16:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::The use of Israel as a comparative example shows a gross lack of perspective. Do people really feel as victimised over the the 'ROI' and 'British Isles' as terms, as third-class Muslims feel genuinely oppressed in areas of Israel (or even regarding the whole state-creation issue of Israel?) How vain, and how stupid! I initially have sympathy with the BI and ROI issues, but when I hear this kind of victim mentality, and see a prosperous and ''thriving'' Ireland (whatever it is called), and an Irish people who are welcomed wherever they choose live, work or visit, I get completely turned off. Is there anything worse than this kind of rabble-rousing extremism, when so few are interested? Talking about keeping pure resentment alive. Using Israel as a comparison is just dumb dumb dumb. (this was my first paragraph! --] (]) 19:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC) Sorry - Israel is a simply wild comparision) | |||
== WP:IECOLL == | |||
::::::Ignoring the unsigned troll; ] appears to be a rather good comparison - that is the Wiki name of the place. It adds | |||
::::::''For other uses, see .'' | |||
::::::But, and this is the key point, the state is called simply '''Israel'''. ] (]) 17:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
Time to revisit the decision to abandon the requirement that all naming debates related to Ireland no longer have to take place at ]? The last was very poorly advertised (I ''think'' only on the ] page itself, and it wasn't even flagged on the ]?) and drew only three participants - one of whom was the proposer - and one additional comment, not counting Arbcom members. ]<sup>]</sup> 12:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Is the word "Ireland" better as the island, or as the state? I know a lot of people feel that geographical terms come first. As I'm not Irish, I'm personally on the fence.--] (]) 17:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I honestly don't think it matters where it takes place, it'll happen and continue to happen. The location doesn't change it. I do wonder if it shouldn't be classed as a contentious topic that requires A) logged in and B) extended-confirmed status to stop the drive by IP initiated or SPA discussions and keep the inevitable future discussions to hopefully editors who are a bit more invested, likely to have an actual conversation, and less likely to go off on emotional tirades like we've seen many times in the past. The topic will be discussed, and as long as it's civilised that's fine. It doesn't quite come under The Troubles banner. I don't think location is important. ] ] 16:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Stop been stupid ''Republic of Ireland'' has been sanctioned by Irish parliament, it wasn't forced on anyone. ] (]) 16:57, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::I was thinking a centralised discussion might at least make it easier to maintain the template listing all past debates... ]<sup>]</sup> 20:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::That is a good point. ] ] 15:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:IMHO, WP:IECOLL should be retired. ] (]) 15:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Do you base that on anything? ]<sup>]</sup> 20:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Should "Irish Republic" redirect here? == | |||
:::::Warning: please stop calling people "stupid" - that is a clear breach of ]. ] (]) 17:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{closed|text= | |||
::::::Stop wiki-fiddling by misrepresenting my comments. ] (]) 19:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
With , {{u|BRMSF}} moved ] to ] and recreated it as a redirect to ]. I don't know enough about the topic to question their argument ({{tq|Almost all uses of the term "Irish Republic" outside of certain ideological or historical contexts refer to the recognized post-1949 state, not to the historic unrecognized state}}) but it is not obviously an uncontroversial move and maybe it should have been discussed first? I'll leave to editors more expert on the topic than I am to judge. ] (]) 13:05, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Hi. RE: | |||
::::::In the interests of fairness I think the argument is that the name hasn't been '''sanctioned''' by the Dail. It has been provided as the '''description of the state'''.] (]) 17:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:* "not an uncontroversial move". I'm inclined to agree. Personally, per ], given that there had previously been a (somewhat contentious and unsuccessful) discussion to move that title to ], I don't think that title should have been moved and retargeted as it was. Without any discussion at all. Either here. Or at ]. (And, in all honesty, given previous arbitration and ANI engagements (including notice on 1RR and "The Troubles") involving {{u|BRMSF}}, that editor should perhaps have considered opening a thread regardless.) | |||
:::::Or Mediocre Britian , because claiming to be great is surely pov. When was ROI santioned by the dáil? And sure Article 4 outweighs any law ] (]) 16:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:* "redirect to Republic of Ireland". I personally don't think the title should be a direct redirect to this title. Even if there was/is consensus that the article (previously at ]) should be moved/retitled, at the very least it should be a DAB page. And not a straight redirect. | |||
::::::The term '''Great Britain''' is geographical and not political however and article 4 doesn't exist anymore.] (]) 17:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks. ] (]) 13:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Mediocre britian was a joke , i understand its meaning. Article doesn't exist anymore ,thats news to me and the supreme court, have you told them you've removed it? ] (]) 17:35, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::In keeping with ], I . And . If {{u|BRMSF}} wishes to open a move discussion thread (to confirm whether there's consensus for a move, whether/what the "new" title should be and whether/what should be done with the "old" title), then ] is the place to open such a discussion thread. ] (]) 14:16, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Might be a joke but based on the "logic" being applied here if some politician used the phrase in the Commons it would be taken as "British Government policy"! ] (]) 17:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::My contention is that this was uncontroversial as the state was never given recognition by any other state (save for ], which also had no recognition) - the idea that a defunct unrecognized state which ceased to exist over a century ago should have precedence over a recognized state which is widely referred to by the same title is somewhat strange. For example ] redirects to ], not to ]. ] (]) 16:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::Would the words have to be after each other because I'm sure the phase it's be a '''mediocre''' year for '''britain''' has been said in the commons , maybe call the article mediocre .... britain :D ] (]) 17:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Per ], a move is always controversial if "there has been any past debate about the best title for the page." There has been past debate: ]. It is therefore controversial and should only be moved via the process for controversial moves. ] (]) 16:22, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::He he! To go with ] ;)] (]) 18:48, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Hi {{u|BRMSF}}. RE: | |||
::::* "contention is that this was uncontroversial". Please read ]. As noted by {{u|DrKay}} above, and per Misplaced Pages convention (as opposed, perhaps, than your own interpretation of "uncontroversial") an undiscussed move should only occur if there {{tq|"has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title"}}. As there had been a previous discussion (in which objections were raised), it wasn't eligible for a bold/uncontroversial move. Regardless of whether the proposed/new title was the same as that discussed before. | |||
*'''Disagree''' for all the reasons stated in the previous discussions this year already - sp. the silly season has arrived again this year! ] (]) 17:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::* "idea that a defunct unrecognized state should have precedence over a recognized state". If you feel the title should be moved, please open a thread (with your proposal/rationale/arguments/etc) at ]. Not here. | |||
::There is nothing remotely "silly" about trying to have my country called by its common, locally and internationally recognised legal name. '''Nothing.''' ] (]) 17:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Thanks. ] (]) 16:33, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Sarah, don't read what is not there. Did I say the idea of this discussion was silly? No, but the fact that this is the third time this year makes this the ''silly season''. ] (]) 17:48, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
}} | |||
:::::Apologies Ww; I am actually livid this vote was called as I thought we had a workable solution. ] (]) 23:18, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support''' per common-usage & to avoid pipelinking. ] (]) 17:13, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support''' per all the well established reasons above.] 17:40, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose'''. Must we go through this again? RoI is a dab invented by the Irish state, and passes WP:COMMON handily.] (]) 17:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::It appears we must TU - but don't blame me! The RoI/Pipe was a solution that was working fine until some absolutists decided to try and suppress it thus bringing this article back into play again. ] (]) 18:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Though not exactly the same thing: the '''Georgia''' situation was solved -], ]-; why shouldn't the '''Irelands''' be solved easily. ] (]) 19:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::Not wishing to be trollish but you could argue that both Georgias are (were?!!) US states :) ] (]) 23:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*'''Strongly oppose''' I agree Ireland is the official name but it is a misnomer. ] 19:22, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::'''Comment''' So is Northern Ireland for that matter - what would you suggest for that Article? --] (]) 20:13, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
* '''Support''' Sarah's reasoning above concurs with my own view. The names of many states are problematic, but it is not for a group of Misplaced Pages editors to manufacture some supposed compromise. As the name of the state is '''Ireland''' according to the constitution, and as it is so registered at the United Nations, no alternative should be seriously considered. ] (]) 19:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
* '''Support''' An encyclopedia does not makes ] or play politics. The name of the state is "Ireland". --] (]) 20:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
* The ambiguity is an issue for me. Our core policy ] states "Titles should be brief without being ambiguous.", ] states "For disambiguating specific topic pages, several options are available: 1. When there is another term (such as Pocket billiards instead of Pool) or more complete name that is equally clear (such as Delta rocket instead of Delta), that should be used." Picking names on legislative grounds is not standard, see ]. So given our policies and that I believe a new reader of en.wp is most likely to pick the longer form than guess correctly our bracketing disambiguation format, and that the long form is commonly enough elsewhere, I '''oppose'''. ] (]) 20:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
* '''Support''' Although I am not wild about the alternative. ROI is no longer used and carries huge political baggage. Northern Ireland is now the undisputed official name (see amendments to the Irish Constitution) for what was contentiously called by some the Six Counties. Similarly Ireland is now Ireland in all official circles. It is not correct to argue that it is a misnomer, that is a POV Blue-Haired Lawyer --] <small>]</small> 22:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::: '''Comment:''' You say "now" as if this is some new development? The UK may have become more ammenable to referring to the southern jurisdiction as Ireland since the British-Irish Agreement (addressing the president as the President of Ireland as so forth) but internationally ] has been ] since 1937. Republic of Ireland is no more out-dated now that it ever has been, it is still the official description of the state, and still the common way to differentiate the Ireland-the-state from Ireland-the-island (intra-Ireland-the-island terminology such as "all-island" aside). | |||
::: The proposed change seems needly complicated to me, when a perfectly run-of-the-mill solution already exists. --] (]) 22:35, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
* '''Strongly oppose''' - RoI is the official description and a common name of the state properly called Ireland. The current solution is normal practice for disambiguating Ireland-the-island from Ireland-the-state. The current solution is clear - where the name is clearly stated to be Ireland, but the means to disambiguate Ireland-the-island from Ireland-the-state is intuitive and uses "the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things" (WP:NAME). In reply to specific arguments put forward by the proposer: | |||
** "the countries offical name and not a discription of the state" - the official name of the country located at ] is in fact the French Republic, ] is officially the Federal Republic of Germany, the ] is officially the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, ] is the Kingdom of Spain, and so on and so on and so on ... As a rule of thumb, you can be certain that an article on a country on WP will NOT be located at the official name of that country - and with good reason. Ireland/Republic of Ireland is no different. | |||
** "the countries common name" - Since ], RoI is the common way to distinguish Ireland-the-state and the Ireland-the-island. Would you like us to go back to 1937-49, where we will have to use Éire to differentiate the two? Republic of Ireland, while it might not be the official name, is undoubtedly a very common name for the state if not the most common name. | |||
** "Will satisfy WP:DAB" - the current solution satisfies WP:DAB, and - more to the point - satisifes WP:NAME: "Generally, article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily <u>recognize</u>, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature." Republic of Ireland is perfectly easily recognizable, eliminates ambiguity and at the same time makes linking easy and second nature. | |||
** "Remove the need to pipe link <nowiki>]</nowiki>" - by requiring the need to pipe link <nowiki>]</nowiki>!? | |||
::--] (]) 22:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::'''Comment''' Interesting that you use the date 1949, which is the date of the UK act (although you pipelink to the correct 1948 act). Also, just to point out for your benefit, I have seen occasions where the opinions of anon IP addresses are not given weight in polls, although you do appear to have a firm grasp of the argument. Perhaps you merely forgot to log in? --] (]) 23:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Indeed, there's usually 2 IP ranges (78.xxx.xxx & 86.xxx.xxx) that frequent these discussions. Yet, they choose not be registered users. ] (]) 23:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::Don't get too excited, GoodDay. Those two ranges include thousands of people that happen to live in an area where people are likely to have an interest in Ireland. ] (]) 08:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::The ], . No confusion/error at all! ] (]) 23:06, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::Its better to just use the name of whatever act is being referred to, or to call it the 1948 act. Especially since the UK passed an act in 1949. Otherwise it is confusing - of course your mileage may vary. --] (]) 23:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::Sorry but our anon editor was not wrong, but you were clearly implying s/he was. ] (]) 23:12, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::HighKing - "Interesting that you use the date 1949" - per Djegan, 1949 was the year that the act came into force. Thanks for the heads up on IPs and weight, it's a choice to use an IP. I've already had the comments above by the proposer because according to his I was "an obvious sockpuppet". --] (]) 23:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*'''Strong Support''' It's the name of the country and any opposition to the change is only for political reasons.<small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
** Could this be another sockpuppet as previously on this vote, in any case are anon votes counted? ] (]) 23:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::They're usually ignored as the voting can easily be abused by ips so I don't see why we should do things any different. They should be discounted.] 23:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
* '''Oppose''', yet again. The article name is a name of the state which is unambiguous. I don't see any reason to change this to any other variation. The name is provided by the Republic of Ireland Act of 1948. That the preferred official name of that state is "Ireland" is not in dispute. Ireland, however, is the name of an island - thus the need for the disambiguation when it comes to the state territory which claims the exact same name as that of the island: the two are not the same, despite the existence of a political desire for that to be the case. --] (]) 23:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Actually, it is '''not''' the name of the state. I've asked above that folk stop suggesting that it is. Falsehoods should render a "vote" invalid. ] (]) 23:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
** '''Comments''': France is not a state which also shares the exact name as that of an island. Likewise with Israel. The term Great Britain doesn't refer to Britain as being "great" in the sense of being "good". It refers to comparative land mass or to a derivative population. --] (]) 23:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
** '''Comments''' You know I do find this use of the 1948 act amusing, it has been seized on to perpetuate a term which (along with others) exemplify a conflict which we all hope is over. Whatever the intent in 1948 it came to be used symbolically thereafter.. The UK Government made a conscious choice to stop using it. This is not like France or the other examples. If the argument is for something which is unambiguous then Ireland (state) is exactly that requiring no further explanation. I can see no reason to retain ROI in the face of the facts, and an unambiguous alternative. --] <small>]</small> 23:13, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Nonsense, patent nonsense. The use of the words "Republic of Ireland" never had anything to do with the conflict, except maybe with fundamentalists with baseball bats, secret bunkers and semtex. Claims like that are unreasonable and cannot be backed up with facts. This is the sort of foolish claims that Matt Lewis was trying to draw attention to above. Headlines, with little fact. ] (]) 23:27, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Surely the names disputes with Uk ] of the names of the Irish state article would suggest otherwise?] 23:31, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::: (edit conflict) Doesn't match my memory or experience Djegan and I'd support Pureeditor in suggesting you look at the reference he makes. I made the statement in good faith, please treat it as such. The facts actually show negotiations over the name being serious ones. --] <small>]</small> 23:37, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::Why do you folks go into ''] protected mode'' so easily? By the way, what facts? Lots of claims on this name/description negotiation. Any citations? ] (]) 23:42, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::: I only go into ] when I see the sorts of comments above (in case you hadn't seen why I mean aggressive statements, accusations that other editors are being foolish). It really doesn't help things you know. In respect of citations you have been referred to another Misplaced Pages article which has a whole load of them. --] <small>]</small> 23:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Not many (relevant) references when I checked. ] (]) 23:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::Is the conflict and dispute been referred here one and the same thing? I think not. To claim otherwise would paint a poor and backward picture of Anglo-Irish relations. ] (]) 23:34, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::"You know I do find this use of the 1948 act amusing" - No great mystery. That is where the term "Republic of Ireland" originates. If it wasn't for that act we would be arguing whether the article should be located at Éire or Ireland, as was the common way to disambiguate Ireland-the-state from Ireland-the-island from the introduction of this confusion with the constitution of 1937 until the 1948 act introduced a new way to disambiguate the two (probably accidentally - the intention was probably to rename the state from "Ireland" to "Republic of Ireland", but that would have required a referendum which in all likelihood could have failed with great embarrassment). --] (]) 00:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
'''Question:''' Just wondering how other encyclopaedias have resolved this issue, not that Misplaced Pages should necessarily conform, but if there is an established pattern it might help take some of the heat out of this contentious issue.] (]) 23:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Interestingly enough and both have ''Ireland'' down for the state, with Ireland (island) for the island. With all the POV flying around from editors, I doubt the quality and accuracy of Misplaced Pages will ever be as good as those though. You never know, a NPOV might happpen and the article titles here might be the same.] 23:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::'''Comment''': Vote currently stands at 8 - 8; this is the nearest yet in the series of "votes" to a vindication of ] and ]. I suggest that if the opponents of ] don't get at least 70% of the vote we take that as "no consensus" for a deviation from normal naming policy, and move the article forthwith. ] (]) 23:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::::One step at a time - don't count your chickens yet. Its not even a day. It could go either way, but likely "no consensus". ] (]) 23:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::::First, this is ]. Second, you might benefit from studying the diagram over a ] - or maybe start small and ask someone to draw you a Dougle-style diagram of Dreams vs. Reality. If all that sounds like too much effort, how about by starting by suggesting what you believe would be a suitable compromise because unless you can effect a change to consensus, things stay as they are. --] (]) 00:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::Not sure who you are referring to here Mr IP. @ Dj - yep; bar a miracle we are heading towards "no consensus". But that is the chicken I'm counting on! ] (]) 00:57, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Those who prefer ''Republic of Ireland'' are striving for NPOV; just like we are. ] (]) 23:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Albeit with political motivations behind them. A lot of editors who support ROI have been quite open about that fact.] 23:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:The same charges could be made to us (who support 'Ireland (state)'. We must be careful, what we say. ] (]) 23:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Are you (Pureditor) trying to slur certain editors? That sort of thing is bound to backfire. ] (]) 23:59, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::I'm not sure what the problem is?] 00:06, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Or maybe I have misinterpreted your comment, you mean that "Ireland" supporters are not open about their political motivations? ] (]) 00:07, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
(outdent) Guys calm down. Lets keep this objective. --] <small>]</small> 00:10, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I am trying to be objective, but I read the above comment to mean that ROI supporters have "political motivations" to editing. ] (]) 00:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::Some pro ROI editors have admitted as such. Just read above, or I can give you some diffs if you like. I'm not sue what political motivations ''Ireland'' supporters would have, from what I can see all they're trying to do is use the constitutional name recognized by the EU and the UN as the title of the state like the way it is on professional online encyclopedias like Britannica and Encarta. But then again, I'm not Irish or British so I may be missing some political motivation, but considering the name is established in the real world I don't think I am.] 00:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::: At various stages on this and related pages we all have suspicions as to political motives. The essence is to focus on facts so I suggest the exchange above cease. --] <small>]</small> 00:18, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Your no more neutral than anyone else. You struck out the first edit, whilst you tidied up the second. ] (]) 00:20, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::: I have a position on this, and I am trying to argue a case. My request was for all of you in this last sequence to move on from attributing motives it doesn't help --] <small>]</small> 00:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
=== break === | |||
OK so the two relevant governments call it Ireland, so does the EU, so does the UN. In addition two other Encyclopedia entries use Ireland. The arguments against reference a 1940's act and their opinion that it is wrong to call it Ireland as it does not cover the whole of the geographical entry. Come on guys, this is meant to be an objective discussion, not a rehash of old disputes. --] <small>]</small> 00:10, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:By the way, I've noticed '''Republic of Ireland''' is slowly continuing to be pipe-linked throughtout Misplaced Pages (sorry Sarah). Is that a good thing, while this ''page movement'' thingy is being conducted? ] (]) 00:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Sorry I'm so slow G'Day - but have you any idea how ''tedious '' this work is? ] (]) 01:01, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::This *is* a rehash of old dispute. See the archives. The official name of the state is not in dispute. Whether is it better to use "Ireland (state)" or "Republic of Ireland" is. The 1948 act is the originator of the latter term. From 1937 until then people used ''Éire'' to disambiguate Ireland-the-state and Ireland-the-island. Since then ' as become the commonly-used differentiator. Please do not make ] arguments it insults both your own intelligence and the intelligence of other's for having to respond to you. --] (]) 00:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Watcha talking about? ] (]) 00:23, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::: the "Straw Man" point seems an assertion to avoid engagement. All the books cited are pre 1995 --] <small>]</small> 00:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Pre 1995 means pre the 1998 Belfast Agreement where the UK agreed to stop using ROI and use Ireland as the same of the state. (sorry for stating the obvious.)] 00:31, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::"Straw man" is a logical fallacy. If the straw man point is valid, then engagement in argument is impossible as a logical argument does not exist to respond to. As for Google books, I suggest you click onto page two to see more references. Or, if you are truly lazy (as I suspect you are), you can follow where it will show you only books from 1996 onwards - or indeed , which will show you only books for 2008. --] (]) 00:35, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::Accusing folk of being "truly lazy" is clearly in breach of ]. As you are an IP I'll be forced to remove your comments with extreme prejudice is you continue to engage in personal abuse. ] (]) 01:06, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::: My degree is Philosophy so I do know of the Straw man fallacy, but I will freely admit that at 0200 in the morning I may not have scrolled through all the pages on your reference. Even having scanned them now I not a lot are travel guides, with some political books that reference ROI. However the context of their reference (current or historic) is not revealed by the google search. I note that you have chosen not to deal with the arguments relating to official government bodies, or for that matter as yet to answer my question on your talk page as to whether you have previously edited the Misplaced Pages under any other name ( a fairly standard question to new IP addresses - your first edit was yesterday - who enter controversial areas). --] <small>]</small> 00:44, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::Hi anon, I also don't understand the point you're trying to make. That some books published use the term? The "Republic of Ireland" is still the legal name of "Ireland" under UK domestic law. How many of these books are British? How many use the term to Dab against Norther Ireland? How many are incorrect (for example, in the 2008 link, the 2nd book mentioned on European Human Rights incorrectly quotes the case as Lawless VS Republic of Ireland when the actual case was Lawless VS Ireland..." --] (]) 00:49, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''' ROI is a perfectly adequate and unambiguous name, is in common usage and reads better in prose than Ireland (state). Would be less opposed, however, if "Republic of Ireland" (piped to "Ireland (state)") were to be accepted as the rule when referencing in other articles. ] (]) 00:30, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Like you, I (and most editors) believe a Dab is required - but your suggestion doesn't makes sense for articles needing to Dab - in effect you're saying that "Ireland (state)" isn't an adequate Dab, or are you saying you just want article to continue to use the term "Republic of Ireland"? --] (]) 01:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose'''. See ]: The State is Ireland, but the State is ''called'' (by ]) the Republic of Ireland. This is therefore the appropriate name for the article. ] (]) 08:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:'''Support''' It's pretty good. --] (]) 09:32, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
=== Ireland package deal === | |||
'''Support "Ireland" 'package deal':''': | |||
*'''(Reasons first):''' Encyclopaedia Britannica redirected my search of “Republic of Ireland” to an article called "Ireland" but uses “republic of Ireland” (small caps) throughout it. I like this ‘small cap’ option. I also noticed that Britannica doesn’t at all have an Ireland (as island) article – I’ve double checked. They have very small Great Britain and British Isles articles (basically link pages), but no article for the island of Ireland. I also notice that the Misplaced Pages Ireland (as island) article is mostly information forked from the Republic of Ireland article. | |||
#Have an article for the <u>state</u> called “'''Ireland'''” (per Britannica). | |||
#Have a much shorter <u>island</u> article entitled “''']'''” (minimum forking!). | |||
#Offer “'''Ireland (state)'''” and "'''Ireland (island)'''" as <u>optional terms</u>, in the MOS guideline. | |||
#Suggest “'''republic of Ireland'''” (<u>small R</u>) as another optional expression, in the MOS guideline. | |||
#Have a <u>shorter</u> “'''Republic of Ireland'''” article offering the football team at the top. It can mention 1949 etc, and effectively be a sub-article of the main “Ireland” one. | |||
:These make sense to me. --] (]) 01:08, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Matt, you are now like ''water in a desert'' where previously you were like ''water in a petrol tank''! I 100% support your suggestions above. You appear to have finally grasped the complex issues involved here and distilled a viable solution. ] (]) 01:18, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
I think the idea of a '''Package''' might be a useful mechanism for getting beyond this cyclical 'frozen conflict'. ] (]) 01:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I like the package deal ] (]) 07:35, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::In principle I'm in favour of compromise packages, but I'm afraid I could not support this one: "The island of Ireland" is a little used term that certainly would not be searched for by anybody; "republic of Ireland" with a small 'r' is never, but never, used; and "Republic of Ireland" with a capital 'R' is not a football team, it is a political entity. ] (]) 08:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
* '''Support''' I would endorse all of Sarah's comments here (and I mean all !). Matt has come up with an evidence based approach, that offers a way forward. Using a small "r" makes it a description not a name. Ireland can have a disambiguation line to take people to the isle page, and there ROI would link automatically. I note that the 1949 act is being pulled out again with complete disregard for subsequent history and that none of the protagonists for ROI are dealing directly with the evidence of UK government use other than to dismiss it in effect as a bad decision. --] <small>]</small> 08:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Article title == | |||
* '''Oppose''' the move/rename/"package deal" proposal. The current naming/situation remains the best compromise in my view. In terms of the island article, "Ireland" remains a super-set term that can be applied to the state, the island, and various sub-sets of it going back 1000s of years, and therefore applying it to the super-set is the most appropriate. (And therefore I find that having "Ireland" as an article about the geo/geo-political/hist article about the entire island is most appropriate). In terms of the state article, while "Republic of Ireland" is a compromise name, (reflecting as it does the state's "description" rather than "name"), given the clash with other uses of the word, I think it remains the best article name, as: it is a naturally formed DAB term that is officially recognised, is in common use, and meets the relevant ] guidelines. (And is certainly more easily included in any article prose and explained in DAB terms than "Ireland (state)" or some other artificially contrived label). ] (]) 09:18, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
The official name of the country is '''Ireland''', not the "Republic of Ireland". Why can't we just move the title to "Ireland" and move the current article ] to "Ireland (island)"? ] (]) 22:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:See ]. ] (<span style="font-variant:small-caps">]</span>) 22:25, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
* '''Oppose''' Better than anything going - many thanks for your ingenuity, Matt, and indeed I think we may be getting somewhere here - but fear that the "island of ..." construction treads onto neologisms (in the sense that this is a newly-preferred way to distinguish between the two in dimplomacy between the GB/IRL/NI) and that writing "republic of .." as opposed to 'Republic of ..." is unintuitive so long as the term Republic of Ireland as legal, common and practical currency. Furtermore the island is not called the "Island of Ireland", but simply "Ireland" - Wiki standard practice is not to make this prone to confusion by having it has ], which I'm sorry I don't see the need for so long as a perfectly acceptable term ("Republic of Ireland") is there, in common use, easily recognizable and used for this exact purpose already. --] (]) 09:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:22, 17 January 2025
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Republic of Ireland article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated, especially about the article's title. Please read recent comments, look in the archives, and review the FAQ before commenting on that topic. |
view · edit Frequently asked questions
|
This page is written in Hiberno-English, which uses the same spelling as British English: colour, realise, travelled. Some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Republic of Ireland was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 29, 2004, December 29, 2005, April 18, 2012, April 18, 2013, April 18, 2019, April 18, 2020, and April 18, 2022. |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Discussions relating to the naming of Ireland articles can be found at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration and its archives |
On 18 August 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Ireland. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Archives |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Not the Republic of Ireland
The name of Ireland is simply Ireland and not the Republic of Ireland. One may refer to the official list of countries from the United Nations or to the websites of the government of Ireland which both indicate this 72.51.112.144 (talk) 16:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes everyone knows. However it's a natural disambiguator since the island is also called Ireland. There are very few country articles on Misplaced Pages that are actually at their official names. Canterbury Tail talk 17:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just have "Ireland" become "Ireland (Island)" why would anybody be looking for the island of Ireland instead of the Ireland country when they search Ireland? Yyythats5yzzz (talk) 21:47, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes everyone knows. However it's a natural disambiguator since the island is also called Ireland. There are very few country articles on Misplaced Pages that are actually at their official names. Canterbury Tail talk 17:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Its official description is "Republic of Ireland" which is used as natural disambiguation, see discussions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration. In contrast "Republic of France" isn't common usage and the country is primary which is why we don't use the official description for France. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, well noted. However unlike the use of "Republic of France", "Ireland" is by the far the most common name used for the state in everyday use, both nationally (Ireland) and internationally (Europe, US and further a field). This is clearly demonstrated in the name of state in Misplaced Pages pages in other languages, for example Irish, German, French, and Dutch. There is little argument for the continued use of the "Republic of Ireland", it has no legal basis or no basis in everyday use. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 09:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @TomÓCiarraí: How do you distinguish between the island of Ireland, and the country of Ireland? You will see at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration which @Crouch, Swale referred to above, that there have been several long discussions previously about this, but never a WP:CONSENSUS to change the articles' names. Bazza 7 (talk) 09:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know this has been discussed to death but surely putting the island to "Ireland (island)" and the country to "Ireland" would be the most accommodating arrangement? What are the cons? I think it makes sense that the country would take precedence over the geography (some examples I came up with: America points to USA not the continent, Austrailia points to the country not continent). D1551D3N7 (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why not the island as "Ireland" and the country to "Ireland (state)"? The island is likely the primary usage considering its existence throughout history and not just 100 and a bit years. Canterbury Tail talk 20:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Age isn't the primary factor in which page should take precedence. Notice how America and Australia have existed as continents for millennia and yet the country takes precedence.
- You are making an assumption when you say the island is the primary usage. I checked the page statistics here and while the island page is currently higher I reckon that's due to it currently being the primary as the patterns on both pages match up. This indicates to me that most views are expecting the country and clicking through to the country page rather than finding what they want on the island page (there is also the possibility of reading both pages).
- As an Irish person I find it somewhat demeaning that you insist the island is the main page and relegate the country to being the secondary topic and clearly others feel this way also whereas moving the island page is generally inoffensive. D1551D3N7 (talk) 21:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Completely agree, that the country should take precedence over the island. More times than not when people refer to Ireland they are referring to the country not the island. As mentioned before this is not the case for Misplaced Pages in other languages, and the current setup in English is confusing to say the least. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 09:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Do you have evidence for that that takes into account thousands of years of historical record before the country was formed? A huge proportion of the world doesn't actually realise there's a difference between Ireland the country and Ireland the island, and most overseas interactions with Ireland on a personal level are regarding the island historically and not the modern political state. As an Irish person I find it somewhat demeaning that people want to sweep aside the history of the island and say that it's only the modern state that is the important topic. Canterbury Tail talk 11:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cannot see how this is sweeping aside history. The modern country of Ireland is very much connected with its history, the country was not created in a vacuum. Struggling to see what your reason is to not call the country by its official name, and the name in which most people globally use (aside from the UK potentially). TomÓCiarraí (talk) 11:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- You're treating Ireland differently to all other countries though, we should treat them in the same manner either referring first to the Geographical landmass or the Nation, in which case many links Australia, Britain, America, South Africa and more would need to be changed to make this consistent. A large part of the reason people don't understand there's a difference is due to poor inconsistent sourcing like this where Ireland is often referred to as part of "The British Isles" or otherwise which leads people to not understand the Country is different to the Island and to the UK. Either way we should be keeping this consistent between all searches and countries. Galdrack (talk) 16:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Do you have evidence for that that takes into account thousands of years of historical record before the country was formed? A huge proportion of the world doesn't actually realise there's a difference between Ireland the country and Ireland the island, and most overseas interactions with Ireland on a personal level are regarding the island historically and not the modern political state. As an Irish person I find it somewhat demeaning that people want to sweep aside the history of the island and say that it's only the modern state that is the important topic. Canterbury Tail talk 11:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Completely agree, that the country should take precedence over the island. More times than not when people refer to Ireland they are referring to the country not the island. As mentioned before this is not the case for Misplaced Pages in other languages, and the current setup in English is confusing to say the least. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 09:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- By that moniker the countries listed would also need to be changed. Galdrack (talk) 16:12, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Why not the island as "Ireland" and the country to "Ireland (state)"? The island is likely the primary usage considering its existence throughout history and not just 100 and a bit years. Canterbury Tail talk 20:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, generally in Ireland and internationally both officially and informally when referring to the country "Ireland" is used and when referring to the island "Island of Ireland" is used. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 09:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know this has been discussed to death but surely putting the island to "Ireland (island)" and the country to "Ireland" would be the most accommodating arrangement? What are the cons? I think it makes sense that the country would take precedence over the geography (some examples I came up with: America points to USA not the continent, Austrailia points to the country not continent). D1551D3N7 (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Actually I meant "French Republic" but in any case although that may be the long official descriptive name I've never heard it used while I've always heard Ireland, the country called "Republic of Ireland" which specifically stated as being the official description. The French constitution doesn't appear to specify the country's long official descriptive name but more importantly is common usage. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- There's a page on this at Names of the Irish state which is very detailed.
- As you are British you will commonly be exposed to "Republic of Ireland" in usage as that's the name British law has chosen to use but for people living in Ireland and the rest of the world this is not the case. The name for the UN, EU, Council of Europe, IMF and OECD is "Ireland". The only place "Republic of Ireland" is used as a name is for the soccer team and also notably this Misplaced Pages page. Google for "Ireland" and "Republic of Ireland" and notice the difference in the results.
- An "official description" is not a name, why are we supposed to use a description of the country as the title instead of its common and constitutional name?
- Only Brits commonly use the "Republic of Ireland" due to Northern Ireland being a common part of their discourse (and need to disambiguate for politics, travel, business) but other countries internationally assume Ireland to be the country or don't have a need for disambiguation so often. Normally if people want to refer to NI they say NI, it's only in the UK that people would ever assume "Ireland" to mean "Northern Ireland" and thus need to disambiguate. D1551D3N7 (talk) 20:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, irish person here, I regularly use the term "Republic of Ireland". I find it useful to use the term to differentiate between the country & the island. 188.141.65.45 (talk) 18:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also, the constitution calls the country "The Republic of Ireland". 188.141.65.45 (talk) 18:39, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't. Article 4 of Bunracht is pretty short and very clear.
- "The name of the State is Éire, or, in the English language, Ireland." Cashew.wheel (talk) 19:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also, the constitution calls the country "The Republic of Ireland". 188.141.65.45 (talk) 18:39, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, irish person here, I regularly use the term "Republic of Ireland". I find it useful to use the term to differentiate between the country & the island. 188.141.65.45 (talk) 18:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- The description of the country is separate to the name of the country. As per Article 4 of the Constitution, the name of the country in English is "Ireland". "Republic of Ireland" has no official status as a name. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 09:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- And not a single person here thinks otherwise. Canterbury Tail talk 11:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- You are indeed correct. Just wanted to ensure there was no equivalence given between description and official name. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 11:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- And not a single person here thinks otherwise. Canterbury Tail talk 11:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @TomÓCiarraí: How do you distinguish between the island of Ireland, and the country of Ireland? You will see at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration which @Crouch, Swale referred to above, that there have been several long discussions previously about this, but never a WP:CONSENSUS to change the articles' names. Bazza 7 (talk) 09:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, well noted. However unlike the use of "Republic of France", "Ireland" is by the far the most common name used for the state in everyday use, both nationally (Ireland) and internationally (Europe, US and further a field). This is clearly demonstrated in the name of state in Misplaced Pages pages in other languages, for example Irish, German, French, and Dutch. There is little argument for the continued use of the "Republic of Ireland", it has no legal basis or no basis in everyday use. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 09:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Can I please ask those who are simply restating established facts, as if they are arguments, to realise that you're not going to "one and done" this discussion by doing so. It is acknowledged fact that Ireland is the name of the state (per the constitution). And that the Republic of Ireland is a description (per the Act). And that the island is also called Ireland (commonly and per the constitution). Etc. Simply restating these established facts (as a kind of "gotcha") is pointless. And does not address the issue that we cannot have two articles with the same title. Please argue your point on the basis of your proposal. And the relevant naming and disambiguation guidelines. For example, if you think that it should be "Ireland" and "Ireland (island)", then argue why the name of the state is (now) the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC (over the island). Or, if you think it should be "Ireland (state)" and "Ireland", then argue why a clunky/Wikipedia-only parenthetical disambiguator is preferred over the common, natural language and officially recognised descriptor. To the extent that WP:NCDAB should be overlooked. Stating things like "the state is called Ireland ", or "Republic of Ireland is a description not the official name ", is about as useful in progressing this discussion as quoting Pi to 10 decimal places. Guliolopez (talk) 12:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well noted. I would argue for the use of Ireland / Ireland (Island) over Ireland (Country) / Ireland, as the former is the primary use of the term. This is demonstrated by a Google search where the majority of results relate to the country not the island. The term for the island has limited use, namely the geographical use for the island and organisations that cover Ireland and Northern Ireland such as the Irish rugby team. All other uses relate to the country. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 14:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Its the official description of the state, isn't that the point? When disambiguation is needed as it is on Misplaced Pages the description is appropriate but when it isn't such as when linking the country in the infobox of Rathmullan it is piped as "Ireland". Per WP:NCDAB if there is a term which is commonly used it can be used for natural disambiguation which seems appropriate here. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- We are talking about a name not a description. They should not be equated. Officially the state should never be referred to as the Republic Ireland, hence this element of the 1948 act is irrelevant to this discussion on the name. As suggested the terms Ireland and Ireland (Island) should be used instead, given Ireland the country is the primary use of the term and not the island. Furthermore this overcomes the confusion between both terms. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 18:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to support Tom's recommendation (new account but please don't hold that against me) that the primary use of "Ireland" should refer to the country rather than the island. I've noted the discussion at this location and elsewhere that not all states are referred to by their official name in their URL, however, I would suggest Ireland is unique in being the only country on Misplaced Pages where its name is shared with a geographic feature and the geographic feature takes precedence. By way of example, the primary topic for Belize, Jordan, Moldova, Niger, Paraguay, Chad and Guinea all refer to the states rather than the geographic features that share their name, i.e. Belize River, Jordan River, Moldova River, Niger River, Paraguay River, Lake Chad and Gulf of Guinea respectively. I would suggest Ireland the state should be at https://en.wikipedia.org/Ireland and the island of Ireland should be at https://en.wikipedia.org/Ireland (island) or https://en.wikipedia.org/Island of Ireland. Most people in Ireland and Northern Ireland would use the phrase "Island of Ireland" if needing to make the distinction between the state and the island but I appreciate the URL is a touch unwieldy so the bracketed (island) version may be more appropriate. Moreover, I think, as Tom mentions, generally, throughout the world, the use of Ireland refers to the state; that's not to say in some contexts people wouldn't use Ireland to refer to the island but it's most definitely in the minority. Consider the use of Paraguay; if the primary Misplaced Pages topic was about the Paraguay River and it said (paraphrasing) "oh, you're looking for the state, that's over here", I think it would be considered odd, confusing and inconsistent. Using Republic of Ireland for the topic on the state named Ireland seems incorrect and a touch anachronistic when a more sensible and consistent solution is available. Jkelly789 (talk) 01:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Rivers and lakes are not a good example as most if not all rivers and lakes on Misplaced Pages take the form "Lake X" or "River X" and don't run in to the same problem as this article, there was never an intention to name the page "Paraguay River" as just "Paraguay". This is why I used the continents examples (Australia, America) which would be referred to in a way that conflicts with the country. Most island states seem to have just one article for both country and island from what I can find (even Cyprus where the island has occupied territory).
- Madagascar has an article for the island at Geography of Madagascar but the state comes first.
- Solomon Islands is the state, geography is at Solomon Islands (archipelago).
- Comoros is the state, geography is at Comoro Islands.
- Samoa is the state, geography is at Samoan Islands.
- There is a counter-example where Micronesia is the geographical group and the state is at Federated States of Micronesia but this has differing factors in that it is a collection of islands and "Micronesia" contains islands than the just state D1551D3N7 (talk) 08:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Noted on the rivers, lakes and gulfs @D1551D3N7. I suppose the point was to supplement other examples mentioned including your references to Australia and America and highlight that Ireland is perhaps the only topic which refers to a geographic feature in the primacy over a state of the same name. I agree that the country should be at Ireland and the island should be at Ireland (island). 70.36.53.242 (talk) 23:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Rivers and lakes are not a good example as most if not all rivers and lakes on Misplaced Pages take the form "Lake X" or "River X" and don't run in to the same problem as this article, there was never an intention to name the page "Paraguay River" as just "Paraguay". This is why I used the continents examples (Australia, America) which would be referred to in a way that conflicts with the country. Most island states seem to have just one article for both country and island from what I can find (even Cyprus where the island has occupied territory).
- @TomÓCiarraí Misplaced Pages doesn't determine article titles based on what something should and should not be called officially, but what is commonly used and practical to an article's specific situation. That's the same reason that Turkey is still the main article for the country whose government would say you should only officially call it "Türkiye".
- As others have said, Wikipedians did know how each term was in use when the decision for the status quo was reached. If it's to be changed, there would need to be something new or not previously discussed. Jèrriais janne (talk) 16:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- As has been explained multiple times in the thread the current title is neither an official name or a common name which makes it different from examples like Turkey where Turkey is a common name for the country. To say this argument is the same as a "use official name" discussion is a misrepresentation. D1551D3N7 (talk) 16:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to support Tom's recommendation (new account but please don't hold that against me) that the primary use of "Ireland" should refer to the country rather than the island. I've noted the discussion at this location and elsewhere that not all states are referred to by their official name in their URL, however, I would suggest Ireland is unique in being the only country on Misplaced Pages where its name is shared with a geographic feature and the geographic feature takes precedence. By way of example, the primary topic for Belize, Jordan, Moldova, Niger, Paraguay, Chad and Guinea all refer to the states rather than the geographic features that share their name, i.e. Belize River, Jordan River, Moldova River, Niger River, Paraguay River, Lake Chad and Gulf of Guinea respectively. I would suggest Ireland the state should be at https://en.wikipedia.org/Ireland and the island of Ireland should be at https://en.wikipedia.org/Ireland (island) or https://en.wikipedia.org/Island of Ireland. Most people in Ireland and Northern Ireland would use the phrase "Island of Ireland" if needing to make the distinction between the state and the island but I appreciate the URL is a touch unwieldy so the bracketed (island) version may be more appropriate. Moreover, I think, as Tom mentions, generally, throughout the world, the use of Ireland refers to the state; that's not to say in some contexts people wouldn't use Ireland to refer to the island but it's most definitely in the minority. Consider the use of Paraguay; if the primary Misplaced Pages topic was about the Paraguay River and it said (paraphrasing) "oh, you're looking for the state, that's over here", I think it would be considered odd, confusing and inconsistent. Using Republic of Ireland for the topic on the state named Ireland seems incorrect and a touch anachronistic when a more sensible and consistent solution is available. Jkelly789 (talk) 01:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- We are talking about a name not a description. They should not be equated. Officially the state should never be referred to as the Republic Ireland, hence this element of the 1948 act is irrelevant to this discussion on the name. As suggested the terms Ireland and Ireland (Island) should be used instead, given Ireland the country is the primary use of the term and not the island. Furthermore this overcomes the confusion between both terms. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 18:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I feel that 'Ireland (island)' is clunky whereas 'Republic of Ireland' is an elegant disambiguation. So I'm opposed to change. Dgp4004 (talk) 08:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- The discussion has moved on from the use of the Republic of Ireland as the name of the state, given this is not the official name and not the name in which most people refer to the country. The question is now which is the primary use of the term Ireland, the state or the island. From my viewpoint the answer is clearly the state. Any additional thoughts? TomÓCiarraí (talk) 10:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- What references and evidence do you have that the state is the primary usage whenever people say Ireland? Canterbury Tail talk 11:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Firstly if you look at Google Trends for searches globally over the last 5 years searches related to Ireland and country or state, are consistently higher than searches related to Ireland and island. Notwithstanding this, many of the top searches for Ireland and Island relate to River Island, Love Island or the islands of Ireland (such as Achill). Which can be further discounted from the searches related to Ireland and Island.
- Secondly, if you consider on a world or European stage, Ireland refers to the country not the island. For example: IMF, OECD, EU, European Council and UN. This is also reflected in non governmental organisations such as the International Energy Agency, European Broadcasting Union, World Medical Association, International Committee of the Red Cross, and the International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies to name but a few. There are limited organisations that refer to the island like rugby and hockey.
- Therefore, the evidence is clear that Ireland primarily refers to the country not the island. If you believe otherwise please put forward the evidence. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 15:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, what evidence would that be, exactly? You're just stating things, and claiming they're facts. They're not. If you're doing some sort of WP:GHITS research, then share your links to your results. I'd love to see what search terms you're using that are bringing in "Love Island" and "River Island" as bona fide results for a search presumably using keywords along the lines of "Island of Ireland" or some variation thereof! Bastun 09:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've yet to see any clear evidence that the island is the primary usage either, just it's longer history. Alas given the status quo, the burden of proof appears to fall on those wanting change.
- My position is that using disambiguating parentheses is preferential as the current situation simply perpetuates the fallacy that the name of the country is "Republic Of Ireland" (both on Misplaced Pages and other sites that source their data from the wiki, an often overlooked side effect).
- I'm sure long term editors are jaded by this topic arising every few months both here and historically at WT:IECOLL, but I would ask this; if the names of the pages were to change, do you think there would be as much demand to revert to "Republic of" as there was to remove it? Cashew.wheel (talk) 16:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- What references and evidence do you have that the state is the primary usage whenever people say Ireland? Canterbury Tail talk 11:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm aware that 'Republic of Ireland' is not the name of the state. It is, however, the name of the Misplaced Pages page and I don't support changing to either 'Ireland (island)' or 'Ireland (state)'. 'Republic of Ireland' is fine in my view. Dgp4004 (talk) 11:27, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's a bit of a circular argument, this discussion is about the name of the Misplaced Pages page. If you feel the name of the page should be the Republic of Ireland, please put forward the reasons why. The evidence is pretty clear, globally Ireland is the name used both officially and colloquially by most organisations and people (see previous comments). The only exception to this is in the UK, in which Republic of Ireland is used frequently. That said the British Government officially refers to the country as Ireland not the Republic of Ireland.
- Finally, I do think that wishes of the country regarding its naming should be respected. It's not a name that is disputed like North Macedonia. To disregard the correct and preferred name is insensitive. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 15:26, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- "The wishes of the country" is a bit of a stretch, Tom. There are very few countries on Misplaced Pages that are actually at their official name. Bastun 09:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think this argument that other countries aren't at their official names is flawed. In Ireland's case both the official and commonly used name are the same. All the examples people give are at the name people commonly use to refer to the country (France, Libya, Mexico, Vatican City, United Kingdom are the examples cited before) and are thus uncontroversial (I couldn't find any discussions trying to use the official names) but here we have a title that is both not the common or official name as the title. D1551D3N7 (talk) 12:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- "To disregard the correct and preferred name is insensitive" "I do think that wishes of the country regarding its naming should be respected" I am irish, and I prefer the current name. So, you claiming that the wishes of the country are to be respected is just like a child on a playground saying "Call him stinkface, he told me to." 188.141.65.45 (talk) 18:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't want to be mean, just that's the best thing I could come up with. 188.141.65.45 (talk) 10:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- "The wishes of the country" is a bit of a stretch, Tom. There are very few countries on Misplaced Pages that are actually at their official name. Bastun 09:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The discussion has moved on from the use of the Republic of Ireland as the name of the state, given this is not the official name and not the name in which most people refer to the country. The question is now which is the primary use of the term Ireland, the state or the island. From my viewpoint the answer is clearly the state. Any additional thoughts? TomÓCiarraí (talk) 10:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm also opposed to this change. Contrary to what is being said about primary topic, when I google "Ireland": https://www.google.com/search?q=ireland+-wikipedia, only six of the top twenty hits relate to the republic. The rest relate to all-Ireland, the island or Northern Ireland. DrKay (talk) 15:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- This is anecdotal evidence, as your Google search is heavily influenced by your search history and location. My Google search returns much more website revering to the country not island. That's why I referenced Google Trends data in my previous comment. There are much more Google searches linked to the country/state than island globally over last 5 years (max time period). TomÓCiarraí (talk) 15:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- This is anecdote, Tom, as you haven't presented any evidence. Bastun 09:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- If your argument is that people looking for the state are getting lost, that's an argument for making 'Ireland' a disambiguation page like Britain surely? Then they can choose the state or the island from there.
- But most of the arguments put forward seem more about emotion / nationhood which is not a good basis on which to make the change. Dgp4004 (talk) 15:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Apologies, if my previous comment was not clear. The Google Trends data relates to the number of search results not searches. There are more search results for Ireland that include country or state than island. I also mentioned most organisations globally refer to Ireland as the country not the island. It is incorrect to call these emotional arguments, if you have other evidence or arguments to contrary, please put them forward. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 16:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Also anecdotally of course (from a stateless browser in Canada), excluding Misplaced Pages, the top results I receive for a Google search for are:
- - Tourism Ireland (ireland.com, all-island - weren't the Irish Times generous to give up this domain name!)
- - Failte Ireland (discoverireland.ie, Ireland)
- - Brittanica (britannica.com, Ireland)
- - Irish Government (gov.ie, Ireland)
- - Education in Ireland (educationinireland.com, Ireland)
- - Department of Foreign Affairs (ireland.ie, Ireland)
- - National Geographic Kids (kids.nationalgeographic.com, Ireland)
- - National Gallery of Ireland (nationalgallery.ie, Ireland)
- - Department of Foreign Affairs (dfa.ie, Ireland)
- - The Irish Times (irishtimes.com, Ireland)
- So, 9 out of 10 refer to the state rather than the island. Tourism Ireland is the only all-island result (again, for me, in Canada) in the top 10. Tourism Ireland is of course based in Ireland but promotes the entire island post Good Friday Agreement. Searches conducted from Ireland and the UK will likely not reflect what most of the world sees. Jkelly789 (talk) 23:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- This is anecdotal evidence, as your Google search is heavily influenced by your search history and location. My Google search returns much more website revering to the country not island. That's why I referenced Google Trends data in my previous comment. There are much more Google searches linked to the country/state than island globally over last 5 years (max time period). TomÓCiarraí (talk) 15:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Contrary to what is being claimed here, google trends demonstrates more worldwide searches for the island rather than the country: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=now%201-d&q=%2Fm%2F03rt9,%2Fm%2F012wgb&hl=en-US. DrKay (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think there's any information to be extracted from that page, its unclear exactly how they determine which is which. All the related queries for both refer to the country and the graph is almost the exact same as well, the difference is minor D1551D3N7 (talk) 19:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- The link you shared does not fully work and the time period you searched is the past day. See below the link for worldwide results from 2004 to today for "Ireland Country + Ireland State" versus "Ireland Island. Both Country and State are used as both are relevant words, the "+" acts as an or. As you can see Country/State is always higher than Island for the whole period since 2004. Additionally the top 3 results for Island relate to River Island so the island results can be discounted even further.
- https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?hl=en-GB&tz=-180&date=all&q=Ireland+island,Ireland+country+%2B+Ireland+state&sni=6 TomÓCiarraí (talk) 05:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's a completely flawed methodology. You are ignoring that (I would imagine) for the vast majority of people putting "Ireland" into a search engine, we simply don't know whether they are looking for the state, or the island. The fact that "River Island" is a top result would suggest that Google Trends' results and algorithms have been as subject to enshittification as the rest of Google. Bastun 09:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am afraid you don't understand how Google Trends data works. It shows how many results contain "Ireland" and "Island", in any order. This is not how many people searched these terms. The top results for these terms indicate the top searches that included terms "Ireland" and "Island" in search results. In this case the top 3 searches were related to retail chain River Island, which for this discussion whether "Ireland" primary usage is the island or the country is irrelevant. These results are made up of people searching for River Island (mostly likely in Ireland) and getting the terms Ireland and island included in their results. Hence based on Google search results there are much more results related to the country than the island. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 10:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The top 5 searches for "Ireland country + Ireland state" relate to country code and Northern Ireland. That is no more relevant than River Island. The data and your claims about it are unconvincing. DrKay (talk) 11:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The top search is "country of Ireland", 3 of the other top 5 searches relate to country code which likely refers to the phone country code (+353), and 1 of the the top 5 results relate to NI. Hence the majority of the top 5 searches relating to "country" are relevant while the majority of the top 5 island searches are irrelevant (i.e. River Island). TomÓCiarraí (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The top 5 searches for "Ireland country + Ireland state" relate to country code and Northern Ireland. That is no more relevant than River Island. The data and your claims about it are unconvincing. DrKay (talk) 11:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am afraid you don't understand how Google Trends data works. It shows how many results contain "Ireland" and "Island", in any order. This is not how many people searched these terms. The top results for these terms indicate the top searches that included terms "Ireland" and "Island" in search results. In this case the top 3 searches were related to retail chain River Island, which for this discussion whether "Ireland" primary usage is the island or the country is irrelevant. These results are made up of people searching for River Island (mostly likely in Ireland) and getting the terms Ireland and island included in their results. Hence based on Google search results there are much more results related to the country than the island. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 10:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's a completely flawed methodology. You are ignoring that (I would imagine) for the vast majority of people putting "Ireland" into a search engine, we simply don't know whether they are looking for the state, or the island. The fact that "River Island" is a top result would suggest that Google Trends' results and algorithms have been as subject to enshittification as the rest of Google. Bastun 09:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
The articles are fine at their current respective homes. In my opinion, as a disambiguator is needed, the natural one is the state's official description. Most states on WP do not have articles at their official name - it's really no biggie. No offense is intended. The vast majority don't take any. (The decision to stop using WP:IECOLL may well have been premature...) Bastun 09:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please put forward evidence why you think the island is the primary use of the term Ireland, not the country. I have put forward evidence above based on Google Trends data and how the vast majority of organisations (in all fields: government, arts, medicine, charity etc) globally refer to the country not the island when they use the term Ireland. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 10:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please stop referring to the description as per the 1948 Act, you are misunderstanding its use. It should be never used as a name. TomÓCiarraí (talk) 10:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- For the record: I would support 'Ireland' for the country name and 'Ireland (island)' for the geographical page. This brings it into line with usage elsewhere, as covered well enough above. I am concerned that Wiki is perpetuating the common misconception that 'Ireland' is the island. As a young Brit whose Dad served in the British Army in Belfast back in the Troubles, I recollect the passionate view at the time that the Republic should not be permitted to appropriate the formerly British-owned term, 'Ireland', and for a while it was Eire. I now feel that the colonial view of Ireland is carried on by Wiki these days and that we should all move on. The name of a country should be what its inhabitants say it is. There was a referendum, we Brits lost. Time we accepted that. Ex nihil 10:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- "the common misconception that 'Ireland' is the island." Um... Ireland is the island. It doesn't have another name. (And one day, the state will also share the same territory). Bastun 12:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- For the record: I would support 'Ireland' for the country name and 'Ireland (island)' for the geographical page. This brings it into line with usage elsewhere, as covered well enough above. I am concerned that Wiki is perpetuating the common misconception that 'Ireland' is the island. As a young Brit whose Dad served in the British Army in Belfast back in the Troubles, I recollect the passionate view at the time that the Republic should not be permitted to appropriate the formerly British-owned term, 'Ireland', and for a while it was Eire. I now feel that the colonial view of Ireland is carried on by Wiki these days and that we should all move on. The name of a country should be what its inhabitants say it is. There was a referendum, we Brits lost. Time we accepted that. Ex nihil 10:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please stop telling me what to do. I am misunderstanding nothing, including how Google Trends works. As I stated, your premise - "Ireland+island,Ireland+country+%2B+Ireland+state" - is flawed from the get-go. Now, we've both had our say. Let's not bludgeon the process, and listen to some other opinions. Bastun 10:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- I agree @Bastun that a disambiguator is needed but in my opinion, Ireland (island) is a better solution than using the description and not the common, and indeed official, name of the country, Ireland, when referencing the state. You state that most articles do not appear at their official name but almost none appear at their full description, e.g. there don't seem to be topics on "Federal Republic of Germany", "The Commonwealth of Australia", "The Kingdom of the Netherlands" or "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"; presumably because it's unwieldy and these states are not commonly known by their full descriptions. @D1551D3N7 raises this point elsewhere that Ireland seems to be somewhat unique in that neither the common nor official name is in use. Referring to the state as Republic of Ireland is not incorrect but refusing to refer to the state as Ireland has deep political connotations, specifically, many UK governments refused to use the term Ireland until post-Good Friday Agreement some 40 years after the name was adopted and Sinn Féin still refuse to use the term, i.e. a refusal to refer to the state correctly as Ireland is particularly common, although not exclusively, amongst the more extreme political ideologies of the Irish left and the British right. Jkelly789 (talk) 18:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
How about modifying the first sentence to clarify the name per the article text:
Ireland (English) and Irish: Éire are the official names of the country also officially described as Republic of Ireland (Poblacht na hÉireann),, a country in north-western Europe...
Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 14:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 18 August 2024
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. There is a clear consensus against moving. (non-admin closure) Un assiolo (talk) 14:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Republic of Ireland → Ireland – This is technically a request for two moves: Republic of Ireland to Ireland and merging the current Ireland article into Geography of Ireland (or temporarily moving it to Ireland (island)). I'm uncertain if this discussion would be better suited to a broader project talk page, which is why I'm making this proposal here. I am aware of the discussion, that decided to leave the articles on their current titles, but that was simply 15 years ago and there are good reasons for both moving and keeping. However, from what I can see, the reasons to move both articles seem to be predominant. Given the frequency of discussions, it is clear that many editors have made significant efforts on various talk pages to move this article, challenging the incorrect assumption by some editors that there is no reason to believe consensus could have changed over the past decade and a half.
"Republic of Ireland" is neither an official term nor is it common, except in Ireland itself and parts of the UK, thus eliminating it as an option. According to the UN. the official English name of the country is, as pointed out by other editors, simply "Ireland". On Misplaced Pages, we either use the short forms for countries (United Kingdom, Mexico, Russia, or Brazil) or we use the official name if it is already a single and concise term (Canada, Belize, Japan, Hungary). It is clear that this situation falls into the latter category, which also aligns with WP:CONCISE.
To avoid the use of parentheses, as seen in Georgia (country), we need to move the article about the island. Taking a glimpse at other island countries like Taiwan or Cyprus, which also occupy their respective short forms, it appears that "Geography of ..." is the established form to describe the underlying island on which the country is located (Geography of Taiwan, Geography of Cyprus). Since Ireland redundantly addresses the politics of its constituent countries—topics that are already covered in their respective articles—I suggest merging it with Geography of Ireland by removing all sections that go beyond the island of Ireland as their subject matter and incorporating all remaining subtopics, such as geological history, into the article Geography of Ireland. Any disambiguation pages don't have to be changed. –Tobias (talk) 13:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note that there have been at least 25 discussions of the title since the poll linked above, so although many were closed early, the question has been revisited many times in the last 15 years. Most of the move discussion outcomes are compiled at Template:IrelandRMArchive. Dekimasuよ! 13:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- There is no need to go back 15 years to find a discussion, there is one still on this page above. CMD (talk) 13:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- I know, from what I can tell, the 2009 discussion was the initial talk about this topic. –Tobias (talk) 14:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- That 2009 discussion was the result of the previous dozen move discussions that resulted in Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names in 2008. Dekimasuよ! 14:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- I know, from what I can tell, the 2009 discussion was the initial talk about this topic. –Tobias (talk) 14:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with this suggestion for the most part. My only addition would be that some content might also have to be moved to History of Ireland Cashew.wheel (talk) 14:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- That is a good point, not all information are suitable for just the geography. –Tobias (talk) 15:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- What evidence is there that the country of Ireland, a state that has existed for just over 100 years and doesn't occupy all of the island, is the primary subject here instead of the island? Why can't the country be at Ireland (country) and leave the island at Ireland? Is there evidence that when people say Ireland they're genuinely talking about the country and not the island and what exists in it, and not mixing the two up as is very commonplace? Canterbury Tail talk 15:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- This is a good counterproposal, and I support this as Option B. Killuminator (talk) 16:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- There is no hard evidence because we don't have access to all statistics, but there are indicators. For example, let's consider the average monthly page views of countries versus their respective islands in the cases of Taiwan and Cyprus according to the page view statistics: Taiwan (~ 420.000 views) vs Geography of Taiwan (~ 13.000 views) and Cyprus (~ 230.000 views) and Geography of Cyprus (~ 10.000 views). This suggests that states are far more searched for than the islands they occupy and I don't see a reason why this should be different for Ireland. In Ireland (~ 260.000 views) and Republic of Ireland (~ 200.000 views), Ireland's views are overall slightly higher than those of the Republic of Ireland.
- Since we don't have access to referral sources, we can't say anything for sure, but given the numbers, we can assume that a vast majority of the Republic of Ireland's views originate from the disambiguation hatnote on the Ireland page. People likely enter "Ireland" in the search bar as nobody initially searches for "Republic of Ireland", are directed to the article about the island, realise the article isn't about the state, and then click on the link in the lead to reach the country’s page. This would fit the difference of around 60.000 views with most likely a few visitors that closed the tab after reaching the article of the island.
- Given the lack of complete clarity, I would suggest aligning this case with similar topics like those mentioned earlier: Cyprus or Taiwan as well as Madagascar or Iceland. These all follow the pattern where the state is the main article, with an article about the island under "Geography of...".
- I don't entirely disagree with your suggestion to move it to Ireland (country), but I think the parentheses can be avoided here, and it would be better to do so if possible. –Tobias (talk) 18:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- That is just WP:OR and as we all know, Misplaced Pages cannot be used as a reference and that includes page hits. It's pure supposition that that's what's happening. Canterbury Tail talk 22:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- OR requires unproven page content and does not include page hits as a statistical and automated process to be recorded, regardless of the source. The numbers from Misplaced Pages align with external search and book statistics, making it unlikely for the hypothesis to be completely incorrect. However, since we are discussing an assumption, I have written a few other paragraphs in case you did not notice. –Tobias (talk) 06:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- That is just WP:OR and as we all know, Misplaced Pages cannot be used as a reference and that includes page hits. It's pure supposition that that's what's happening. Canterbury Tail talk 22:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:DABCONCEPT, WP:COMMONNAME (including WP:NATURAL) and per WP:SED (which I wrote years ago, in terms of the merger of the island article). As has previously been discussed "Republic of Ireland" is an official description and is in common usage unlike say United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Georgia isn't comparable becauase the long name may not be official or at least isn't common usage, see Talk:Georgia (country)#Requested move 10 April 2024. Cyprus and Taiwan aren't comparable as in those cases the countries cover similar areas to the islands which isn't the case for Ireland where Northern Ireland covers a significant amount of the area and population. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, Georgia isn't only comparable, but rather nearly the identical issue, a country without a long official form, only difference is that there is no made-up name that is used as an article title and there is a U.S. state with the same name. The discussion you mentioned supports my point, I'm just wondering why you think that this is any different than in this case. The idea of moving Georgia to a made-up name was vastly rejected. Here, we got the identical situation in reverse, with a made-up name already applied and my idea is to move it back to it's real, official, and more common name. I opened the discussion with those very guidelines you mentioned. WP:NATURAL requires a name that is not made-up, "Republic of Ireland" is a made-up name as it isn't broadly accepted (remember, globally, not only within the UK and Ireland) and not the official name either if we stick to the UN, which is probably the best way to determine, whether a term for a state is official or not. In this case, it is definitly not official unless you can not offer clear evidence for the claim that it is. WP:COMMONNAME contradicts your reasoning as well; "Ireland" is way more common than "Republic of Ireland", throughout the article as well as outside of Misplaced Pages, and by "way more", I mean more than fifty times as much.
- When you say that Cyprus isn't comparable, I just got one question for you: have you ever looked at a map of Cyprus showing the area of Northern Cyprus? This is exactly the same, we got two different states on one island; "Northern (island name)" on one hand and just "(island name)" on the other. Otherwise, I don't understand why this should be different; maybe you can explain this idea a little further? –Tobias (talk) 18:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Except that Republic of Ireland is not a made up name, it's in fact an official descriptor of the country. The constitution of the country gave us a natural disambiguator. And Republic of Ireland is indeed used, just ask the football team. And it's in use by the government of Ireland as a simple search across the government websites shows. It's not some made up term that is only used by the British or some such. Canterbury Tail talk 22:24, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Need I remind you that it was FIFA that imposed that name on the Football Association of Ireland team in 1953? Cashew.wheel (talk) 07:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- You needn't, because we're not talking about the football team, we're talking about the island, and the state, which our government said could be officially described as 'the Republic of Ireland', in the Republic of Ireland Act, 1948. Bastun 10:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Are you really asking me to consult the local football team while simultaneously claiming, without any statistical indicator, that it was common outside the UK and Ireland? –Tobias (talk) 07:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Need I remind you that it was FIFA that imposed that name on the Football Association of Ireland team in 1953? Cashew.wheel (talk) 07:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Except that Republic of Ireland is not a made up name, it's in fact an official descriptor of the country. The constitution of the country gave us a natural disambiguator. And Republic of Ireland is indeed used, just ask the football team. And it's in use by the government of Ireland as a simple search across the government websites shows. It's not some made up term that is only used by the British or some such. Canterbury Tail talk 22:24, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- "Republic of Ireland" is not tue common name. Globally "Ireland" is the common name for the country. Cashew.wheel (talk) 18:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for the reasons I have stated every other time this has come up: in brief summary, the status quo works because 1) "Optimising for readers over editors" precludes use of artificial construct disambiguators such as Ireland (state), Ireland (island). 2) The island of Ireland is known as - well, "Ireland". In the English language, it does not have any alternative common name or description. WP:COMMONNAME can therefore be claimed by the article on the island. 3) Using "Republic of Ireland" for the state doesn't allow the state to reside at a page called by its official name - but so what? There are literally dozens of country articles in the Wiki not on the official name of their state. 4) Not only has there never been a consensus to move Republic of Ireland to Ireland, there is demonstrable consensus to retain the status quo. That's visible in the many, many polls taken prior to the 2009 poll, and in the ones since. My country's article isn't at its official name? So what. There are 205 articles on individual sovereign states on Misplaced Pages. Only 30 of them are at their official name. The status quo works. Tobias is, with the best will in the world, proposing a whole heap of work, for many editors, that ultimately doesn't benefit the reader. Bastun 19:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not really a consensus, just more seasoned editors shoot it down each time. Just because it's the status quo doesn't make it correct, otherwise this topic wouldn't get restarted monthly.Cashew.wheel (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, a consensus, really. Click on the link in my post. Scroll down a bit. Read the poll results. I've done that work, you can do the rest - all the ones since, up until last year, should be on the WP:IECOLL talk page. It's absolutely not "just more seasoned editors shooting it down each time." It is, quite often, more seasoned editors saying "Here's why the status quo works, but sure, consensus can change, do you have any new arguments?" - and there aren't any. Bastun 19:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, I've read it all. And I've seen that "consensus can change" line many time. Cashew.wheel (talk) 20:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, a consensus, really. Click on the link in my post. Scroll down a bit. Read the poll results. I've done that work, you can do the rest - all the ones since, up until last year, should be on the WP:IECOLL talk page. It's absolutely not "just more seasoned editors shooting it down each time." It is, quite often, more seasoned editors saying "Here's why the status quo works, but sure, consensus can change, do you have any new arguments?" - and there aren't any. Bastun 19:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Since I already answered most of this points in this discussion, I'll keep it short: short forms are no official names, but no made-up names either, so absolutely valid to use in terms of concision - "Republic of Ireland" is neither concise nor legally existing at all.
- There is a alternative to "Ireland", actually two: "Ireland (island)" and "Geography of Ireland". Both of them are common on WP with the latter option being predominantly used. –Tobias (talk) 20:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Wait, what now? 'Republic of Ireland
is neither concise nor legally existing at all.
', where's that coming from? I refer you to the Republic of Ireland Act. 'Republic of Ireland' is the official, legal description of the state. Which you would know if you'd read the articles in question, or the previous move debates. As a relatively inexperienced editor, editing outside your normal areas of interest, I'd suggest doing your research before making proposals from a position of ignorance, especially in controversial areas. Bastun 09:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)- What don't you understand about the difference between an official description and an official name? We're not seeking a description of the state's cultural or political identity, but rather an internationally recognised official term that aligns with UN records. According to them, this is not the official name and therefore legally nonexistent, regardless of the country declaring it its official description. And before you want to use that as an argument: yes, the UN also acknowledge short forms like "Poland" instead of "Republic of Poland", this is no deviation of an official form. –Tobias (talk) 07:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Let me express this in words of no more than
twothree syllables. We passed a law that states the country's official description. That makes it legal. A UN style guide doesn't negate or override that. Bastun 13:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)- That still doesn't make a description a name. –Tobias (talk) 14:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Let me express this in words of no more than
- What don't you understand about the difference between an official description and an official name? We're not seeking a description of the state's cultural or political identity, but rather an internationally recognised official term that aligns with UN records. According to them, this is not the official name and therefore legally nonexistent, regardless of the country declaring it its official description. And before you want to use that as an argument: yes, the UN also acknowledge short forms like "Poland" instead of "Republic of Poland", this is no deviation of an official form. –Tobias (talk) 07:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- But Ireland isn't about the geography of the island. The section on the union with Britain is longer than the entire geography section. Traumnovelle (talk) 08:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- It is about the physical island, not a state on it. That's why economy, culture, and politics are misplaced here—they belong in the articles of the respective states, meaning this article and Northern Ireland. –Tobias (talk) 13:51, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Wait, what now? 'Republic of Ireland
- Not really a consensus, just more seasoned editors shoot it down each time. Just because it's the status quo doesn't make it correct, otherwise this topic wouldn't get restarted monthly.Cashew.wheel (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - "Republic of Ireland" is an official term, while it is not the name of the state, it is the "official description" of the state. That being said, we don't use official names here simply because they're official. Merging the existing Ireland article into Geography of Ireland is simply a non-starter as there is far more content in the former article than just about the island's geography. To have the country at the basename it would have to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, which is impossible to prove considering we have no way of determining whether searches for Ireland are for the country or the whole island. And yes, therein I could see an argument for a WP:NOPRIMARY with the basename as a dab and the two articles existing as Ireland (country)/Republic of Ireland and Ireland (island), but the whole island has the long-term significance (PT2) by default imo, and unless PT1 can be proven to favor the country, I see no reason to change the existing arrangement. estar8806 (talk) ★ 02:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- There is a method to evaluate WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, switch to a disambiguation page for a set period of time, after which the traffic to each can be evaluated to determine which topic readers are actually looking for. Cashew.wheel (talk) 07:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose long term significance goes to the island itself. The Kingdom of Ireland has just as much a claim to primacy, if not a greater one, than the modern Irish republic. Traumnovelle (talk) 05:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The current arrangement is sensible. The name "Republic of Ireland" is well-known and frequently used to distinguish the country from the broader island. 2401:7000:CAD3:BB00:6C10:7147:5254:CEE5 (talk) 06:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I couldn't help notice that the proposer recently flagged what they identified as problems on another article, and when asked to help with the cleanup they proposed, they responded with
Great to hear that. I would love to help, but I currently don't have the time or motivation to rewrite the entire page.
🙄 Bastun 10:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)- Congratulations, and ... what now? That has absolutely nothing to do with this and maintenance hatnotes exist to point out specific flaws until they are addressed, they to not obligate the flagger to participate in the correction, if that is what you're trying to say. –Tobias (talk) 05:40, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. While the country is indeed commonly known as Ireland, it is not primary over the island. And it is also very commonly known as the Republic of Ireland or simply "the Republic", so the current title is very good natural disambiguation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:39, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: Oh no, not again! Oppose per previously reasons I've given in several other discussions as well as all the reasons given by other editors above, so there is no need to repeat them all here. Moving this to Geography of Ireland is just not thinking what that article is actually about. This is a dead topic, just leave it be, it works as it is. ww2censor (talk) 10:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: I think the current title is appropriate. It's widely recognized and easily understood. Waqar💬 14:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: Would introduce needless confusion and become factually incorrect. Ceoil (talk) 14:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Ceoil How would it be "factually incorrect"? Cashew.wheel (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Must confess to being curious about that one myself. Canterbury Tail talk 19:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Because legally there the Island of Ireland consisting of the Republic of Ireland and the North of Ireland. Ceoil (talk) 23:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- "North of Ireland"? That's a very creative one, I have to admit. Unfortunately for you, they are legally known as "Ireland" and "Northern Ireland". –Tobias (talk) 05:46, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Because legally there the Island of Ireland consisting of the Republic of Ireland and the North of Ireland. Ceoil (talk) 23:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Must confess to being curious about that one myself. Canterbury Tail talk 19:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Ceoil How would it be "factually incorrect"? Cashew.wheel (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above, plus if this were to occur, we would have to say "Northern Ireland is not part of Ireland". The republic currently doesn't cover the entire island of the same name, and the island has long-term significance. The current arrangement is probably the best alternative option for the two "Ireland" subjects until political events change the situation. DankJae 14:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose move and WP:SNOW close. This has been discussed to death. O.N.R. 20:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It appears that it is snowing. But in my opinion, such a move would only cause confusion. The current set up works because it helps distinguish between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland and the island itself is covered separately. And I'm also of the opinion that we should maintain the status quo when things are working. Keivan.f 11:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- What leads you to assume that this would only cause confusion in the case of a move? I understand your reasoning, but we don't have templates like About or For here on WP just to decorate our body text. –Tobias (talk) 12:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No reason to change, and lots of reasons not to change at this point. If I say my ancestors came from Ireland, but they arrived in the 1800s, current naming is correct. --130.111.220.19 (talk) 17:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Even after a possible move, it will not be any less correct. The island remains the island, no matter what the title of the article is. –Tobias (talk) 18:38, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Merge Republic of Ireland into Ireland. The proposed move doesn't really work because the Ireland article is about much more than geography- it's also about the culture and the nation in general- but thinking about it, there are issues with the current status quo. Ireland#Culture and Republic of Ireland#Culture are largely duplicates for instance; if people seeking information about the government as well as general culture of Ireland come across this article or the other one, the information will inevitably be split. The scope of Ireland also isn't clear- the article currently starts with "Ireland is an island" but the article clearly covers the whole of the 32 counties, including small offshore islands. I don't think it's impossible to combine the articles in an easily-understandable way, whilst being clear that the sovereign state does not have sovereignty over the whole of Ireland. Chessrat 22:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Strong disagree. There's a clear distinction between the island that has been populated for millennia and the modern country that has only existed since 1922. It's also perfectly common for there to be some duplication of information across articles about related topics. Besides, equating the Republic of Ireland with the island of Ireland would be walking into a political minefield. 2401:7000:CADC:EE00:A003:54F7:23A4:5469 (talk) 05:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- No one is suggesting equating the country of Ireland with the island of Ireland, just using it's official and WP:COMMONNAME for the countries article.
- @Chessrat makes a point others have made before, the Ireland article is nebulous and isn't distinct. The content of the article is not limited in scope to the island of Ireland but rather the nation as an abstract concept, covering it's geography, history & politics etc. Cashew.wheel (talk) 09:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- But you can talk about the geography, history, and politics of the whole island in a way distinct from those of the Republic of Ireland specifically. Besides, "Republic of Ireland" is a common name and an official one under the Republic of Ireland Act 1948. 2401:7000:CADC:EE00:A003:54F7:23A4:5469 (talk) 11:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- No, it is not an official name, just an official description, and it is not commonly used outside of the British Isles. The history of Ireland inevitably overlaps with the history of this article, as does its politics and demographics, since the country occupies the majority of the island's area. Everything else is included in Northern Ireland. –Tobias (talk) 11:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- "it is not an official name, just an official description" That sounds like a distinction without a difference.
- "it is not commonly used outside of the British Isles" Yes it is. I live outside the British Isles, and I use it.
- 2401:7000:CADC:EE00:A003:54F7:23A4:5469 (talk) 11:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- There is a difference between a personal experience and a statistical fact. Those facts clearly show only a small peak in frequency within the British Isles, primarily in Ireland itself, with no indication of common usage outside Britain whatsoever. The difference between an official name and a description is that an official name is internationally accepted and recorded in UN files. A description is nothing more than a national designation used to display the form of government or cultural identity and has no international significance at all. –Tobias (talk) 12:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Those data actually show usage of the term "Republic of Ireland" outside the British Isles. They support my position, not yours. The rest of your comment is hair-splitting. The fact remains that Dublin itself has endorsed the term "Republic of Ireland" in Irish legislation. 2401:7000:CADC:EE00:A003:54F7:23A4:5469 (talk) 12:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- No, 'Republic of Ireland' remains unofficial as a name, according to the UN and the Irish constitution, and is uncommon as we clarified several times above. Of course, every term is used everywhere at some point, even Russian Хлеб in Spain, but the usage outside the British islands is absolutely insignificant in comparison. You're just trying to distort clear facts to fit your opinion. –Tobias (talk) 12:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- You keep repeating this, and you continue to be wrong. As previously pointed out to you, the Republic of Ireland Act of 1948, passed by the Oireachtas and signed into law, designates "Republic of Ireland as the official description of the state. What the UN says in a style guide is neither here nor there. Please desist from continuing to spread misinformation. Bastun 14:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Article 4 of the Constitution of Ireland couldn't be clearer, the name of the country, in English, is "Ireland". That's an indisputable fact.
- If anyone is spreading misinformation it's Misplaced Pages, as by maintaining the status quo it perpetuates fallacy that the name of the country is the "Republic of Ireland".
- This debate does not exist anywhere else as every country, official body (except for FIFA) and reference work accepts that the name of the country is "Ireland". Cashew.wheel (talk) 15:08, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't really see anyone making the claim that Republic of Ireland is actually the official name (or a name) of the country, only that it's the official description and is therefore a useful natural disambiguator for uses of the word Ireland. We all know the name of the country in English is Ireland, that's not in dispute. However, as has been shown, even the Irish government uses the term Republic of Ireland in documentation etc. to refer to the country when a disambiguator is required while also talking about the island of Ireland. When the government of the country in question sometimes uses the term for such purposes, who are we to argue against that? People seem to operate under the clearly false impression that the term isn't used inside the country, when it is. Canterbury Tail talk 15:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- 100% agree, the name of "Ireland" and description as "Republic of Ireland" are facts of law and shouldn't be up for debate. (Despite a number of contributions to the contrary)
- I'll maintain a description is not a name, but more importantly I have yet to find another other reference work or list of countries maintained by an official body (except for FIFA) that use the prefix "Republic of". Misplaced Pages is the outlier. The overwhelming evidence shows that "Ireland" is the WP:COMMONNAME used the world over, while opposition to moving the article is based on reluctance change and ... vibes. Cashew.wheel (talk) 15:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't really see anyone making the claim that Republic of Ireland is actually the official name (or a name) of the country, only that it's the official description and is therefore a useful natural disambiguator for uses of the word Ireland. We all know the name of the country in English is Ireland, that's not in dispute. However, as has been shown, even the Irish government uses the term Republic of Ireland in documentation etc. to refer to the country when a disambiguator is required while also talking about the island of Ireland. When the government of the country in question sometimes uses the term for such purposes, who are we to argue against that? People seem to operate under the clearly false impression that the term isn't used inside the country, when it is. Canterbury Tail talk 15:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- You keep repeating this, and you continue to be wrong. As previously pointed out to you, the Republic of Ireland Act of 1948, passed by the Oireachtas and signed into law, designates "Republic of Ireland as the official description of the state. What the UN says in a style guide is neither here nor there. Please desist from continuing to spread misinformation. Bastun 14:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- No, 'Republic of Ireland' remains unofficial as a name, according to the UN and the Irish constitution, and is uncommon as we clarified several times above. Of course, every term is used everywhere at some point, even Russian Хлеб in Spain, but the usage outside the British islands is absolutely insignificant in comparison. You're just trying to distort clear facts to fit your opinion. –Tobias (talk) 12:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Those data actually show usage of the term "Republic of Ireland" outside the British Isles. They support my position, not yours. The rest of your comment is hair-splitting. The fact remains that Dublin itself has endorsed the term "Republic of Ireland" in Irish legislation. 2401:7000:CADC:EE00:A003:54F7:23A4:5469 (talk) 12:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- There is a difference between a personal experience and a statistical fact. Those facts clearly show only a small peak in frequency within the British Isles, primarily in Ireland itself, with no indication of common usage outside Britain whatsoever. The difference between an official name and a description is that an official name is internationally accepted and recorded in UN files. A description is nothing more than a national designation used to display the form of government or cultural identity and has no international significance at all. –Tobias (talk) 12:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- "Republic Of Ireland" is the common name of the soccer team, "Ireland" is the common name of the country, island and Kim Basinger's daughter.
- The name of the country is very clear, it is literally Article 4 of the constitution and is the accepted common name by every international organisation (UN, EU, World Bank, UK Government). Alongside Misplaced Pages, the BBC is one of the few sources that commonly doesn't use the official name due to their editorial guidelines. Cashew.wheel (talk) 11:50, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- It's obvious that we're going in circles here, so I'm just going to note that this proposal has yielded a clear majority in favour of the status quo. 2401:7000:CADC:EE00:A003:54F7:23A4:5469 (talk) 12:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- No, it is not an official name, just an official description, and it is not commonly used outside of the British Isles. The history of Ireland inevitably overlaps with the history of this article, as does its politics and demographics, since the country occupies the majority of the island's area. Everything else is included in Northern Ireland. –Tobias (talk) 11:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- But you can talk about the geography, history, and politics of the whole island in a way distinct from those of the Republic of Ireland specifically. Besides, "Republic of Ireland" is a common name and an official one under the Republic of Ireland Act 1948. 2401:7000:CADC:EE00:A003:54F7:23A4:5469 (talk) 11:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Strong disagree. There's a clear distinction between the island that has been populated for millennia and the modern country that has only existed since 1922. It's also perfectly common for there to be some duplication of information across articles about related topics. Besides, equating the Republic of Ireland with the island of Ireland would be walking into a political minefield. 2401:7000:CADC:EE00:A003:54F7:23A4:5469 (talk) 05:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. The discussion here keeps revolving around official name, but that is not the reason for the current article title or a valid reason to change it. DrKay (talk) 15:42, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Moral support. This is likely to fail, but I'm somewhat surprised by the strong opposition to the move. "Ireland" is the common name for the country, and most if not all sources refer to it solely as that. ~~ Jessintime (talk) 15:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- The problem is, that's not the only thing reliable sources refer to as Ireland. The Irish Potato Famine, for example, happened in Ireland significantly before Ireland became a country. There's a whole lot of history that happened in Ireland before 1922/1937.--130.111.220.19 (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Every historical period has its own designation. In the case of the Great Famine, it occurred during a time when the country was referred to as Ireland. While it is possible to refer to the geographical area of any past event, this approach is often imprecise, even though I agree that this does not pertain to the modern-day state of Ireland. However, if no distinct name exists for a specific period, History of Ireland would be the preferred option rather than referring solely to the island itself. Short forms are used to describe modern-day countries on Misplaced Pages, even when significant historical periods might be more prominent than the current state (e.g. Russia, Japan, and England refer to the modern-day countries rather than the Russian Empire, Empire of Japan, or Kingdom of England, let alone the islands or geographical regions they once occupied). Short forms tend to encompass the entire history of a particular area (e.g. Cyprus, Taiwan, or Japan). However, if there is a risk of confusion, disambiguation hatnotes can resolve the issue, as they currently do. –Tobias (talk) 18:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- The problem is, that's not the only thing reliable sources refer to as Ireland. The Irish Potato Famine, for example, happened in Ireland significantly before Ireland became a country. There's a whole lot of history that happened in Ireland before 1922/1937.--130.111.220.19 (talk) 17:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose because it's been discussed many times and no new arguments have been made. Seems this is the least bad way to do things. This problem is likely to disappear in the next few years with Irish reunification so it's especially not worth getting exercised about. John (talk) 13:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per the 1919 Dáil 😉 SerialNumber54129 18:29, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - How can the page be moved, when we already have an article named Ireland, for the island? You have to have an RM for both articles, not just for the country. GoodDay (talk) 15:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's the reason why I addressed it in the proposal. –Tobias (talk) 19:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- The island article would have to be changed to "Ireland (island)". Anyways, I don't see either article being moved, anytime soon. GoodDay (talk) 19:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's the reason why I addressed it in the proposal. –Tobias (talk) 19:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
WP:IECOLL
Time to revisit the decision to abandon the requirement that all naming debates related to Ireland no longer have to take place at WP:IECOLL? The last was very poorly advertised (I think only on the WP:IECOLL page itself, and it wasn't even flagged on the Wikiproject Ireland?) and drew only three participants - one of whom was the proposer - and one additional comment, not counting Arbcom members. Bastun 12:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- I honestly don't think it matters where it takes place, it'll happen and continue to happen. The location doesn't change it. I do wonder if it shouldn't be classed as a contentious topic that requires A) logged in and B) extended-confirmed status to stop the drive by IP initiated or SPA discussions and keep the inevitable future discussions to hopefully editors who are a bit more invested, likely to have an actual conversation, and less likely to go off on emotional tirades like we've seen many times in the past. The topic will be discussed, and as long as it's civilised that's fine. It doesn't quite come under The Troubles banner. I don't think location is important. Canterbury Tail talk 16:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- I was thinking a centralised discussion might at least make it easier to maintain the template listing all past debates... Bastun 20:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- That is a good point. Canterbury Tail talk 15:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- I was thinking a centralised discussion might at least make it easier to maintain the template listing all past debates... Bastun 20:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- IMHO, WP:IECOLL should be retired. GoodDay (talk) 15:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Do you base that on anything? Bastun 20:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Should "Irish Republic" redirect here?
The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.With this move, BRMSF moved Irish Republic to Irish Republic (unrecognised state) and recreated it as a redirect to Republic of Ireland. I don't know enough about the topic to question their argument (Almost all uses of the term "Irish Republic" outside of certain ideological or historical contexts refer to the recognized post-1949 state, not to the historic unrecognized state
) but it is not obviously an uncontroversial move and maybe it should have been discussed first? I'll leave to editors more expert on the topic than I am to judge. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 13:05, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. RE:
- "not an uncontroversial move". I'm inclined to agree. Personally, per WP:BOLDMOVE, given that there had previously been a (somewhat contentious and unsuccessful) discussion to move that title to Irish Republic (1919–1922), I don't think that title should have been moved and retargeted as it was. Without any discussion at all. Either here. Or at Talk:Irish Republic. (And, in all honesty, given previous arbitration and ANI engagements (including notice on 1RR and "The Troubles") involving BRMSF, that editor should perhaps have considered opening a thread regardless.)
- "redirect to Republic of Ireland". I personally don't think the title should be a direct redirect to this title. Even if there was/is consensus that the article (previously at Irish Republic) should be moved/retitled, at the very least it should be a DAB page. And not a straight redirect.
- Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 13:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- In keeping with WP:RMUM, I requested that the undiscussed move be undone. And it has. If BRMSF wishes to open a move discussion thread (to confirm whether there's consensus for a move, whether/what the "new" title should be and whether/what should be done with the "old" title), then Talk:Irish Republic is the place to open such a discussion thread. Guliolopez (talk) 14:16, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- My contention is that this was uncontroversial as the state was never given recognition by any other state (save for Soviet Russia, which also had no recognition) - the idea that a defunct unrecognized state which ceased to exist over a century ago should have precedence over a recognized state which is widely referred to by the same title is somewhat strange. For example Italian Republic redirects to Italy, not to Italian Republic (Napoleonic). BRMSF (talk) 16:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Per Misplaced Pages:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves, a move is always controversial if "there has been any past debate about the best title for the page." There has been past debate: Talk:Irish Republic#Requested move. It is therefore controversial and should only be moved via the process for controversial moves. DrKay (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi BRMSF. RE:
- "contention is that this was uncontroversial". Please read WP:BOLDMOVE. As noted by DrKay above, and per Misplaced Pages convention (as opposed, perhaps, than your own interpretation of "uncontroversial") an undiscussed move should only occur if there
"has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title"
. As there had been a previous discussion (in which objections were raised), it wasn't eligible for a bold/uncontroversial move. Regardless of whether the proposed/new title was the same as that discussed before. - "idea that a defunct unrecognized state should have precedence over a recognized state". If you feel the title should be moved, please open a thread (with your proposal/rationale/arguments/etc) at Talk:Irish Republic. Not here.
- "contention is that this was uncontroversial". Please read WP:BOLDMOVE. As noted by DrKay above, and per Misplaced Pages convention (as opposed, perhaps, than your own interpretation of "uncontroversial") an undiscussed move should only occur if there
- Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 16:33, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi BRMSF. RE:
- Per Misplaced Pages:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves, a move is always controversial if "there has been any past debate about the best title for the page." There has been past debate: Talk:Irish Republic#Requested move. It is therefore controversial and should only be moved via the process for controversial moves. DrKay (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Article title
The official name of the country is Ireland, not the "Republic of Ireland". Why can't we just move the title to "Ireland" and move the current article Ireland to "Ireland (island)"? 2001:8003:9100:2C01:D571:F7D9:C6E0:D9E7 (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages articles that use Hiberno-English
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-4 vital articles in Geography
- B-Class vital articles in Geography
- B-Class Ireland articles
- Top-importance Ireland articles
- B-Class Ireland articles of Top-importance
- All WikiProject Ireland pages
- B-Class Celts articles
- Top-importance Celts articles
- WikiProject Celts articles
- B-Class country articles
- WikiProject Countries articles
- B-Class Irish republicanism articles
- Top-importance Irish republicanism articles
- WikiProject Irish republicanism articles