| Revision as of 06:25, 5 September 2008 editRFC bot (talk | contribs)216,124 editsm Update, 11 current discussions← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:43, 5 September 2008 edit undoHarej (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users25,255 edits redirect | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| '''The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:''' | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> This section of the article has failed to provide citations for the stated references, regarding an alleged tribal communal practice. Editors have now engaged in an editorial debate over the matter, however an external range of comments are sought to try and resolve the issue. Perhaps extrenal advice may help resolve the issue. It is an interesting topic of a peoples, but I feel that some poorly written/POV language may be marring the integrity of the subject into a propoganda slant. Comments please.... | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> To find a unbiased solution on which Native American images to keep, to include or not to include names with images, and the number of images needed for such a diversified ethnic group. | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> Does a long, non-neutral quote belong to this article? | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> Should over half the demographics section dicuss Islam, a small group in Rwanda (see ]). Also, issues pertaining to ] remain ongoing. | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> Is this article mostly original research, and does it violate several other guidelines? | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> To find a solution on whether or not using "Beit Guvrin" as Bayt Jibrin's original Aramaic name in the article. | |||
| * <strong>]</strong> image may reflect out of date or racist science | |||
| {{#ifeq:{{{hide_instructions}}}|yes| |{{RFC tagging instructions|RFChist}} }} | |||
| <noinclude>''For more information, see ]''</noinclude> | |||
Latest revision as of 23:43, 5 September 2008
Redirect to: