Misplaced Pages

User talk:CENSEI: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:21, 23 February 2009 view sourceCENSEI (talk | contribs)1,318 edits 3RR← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:47, 9 August 2015 view source Doug Weller (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators264,417 editsm Protected "User talk:CENSEI": restored deleted page, no reason for anyone to edit this now ( (indefinite) (indefinite)) 
(127 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{unblock reviewed|1=I am not disputing my block, I could quite frankly give a rats ass about Misplaced Pages and or editing it as I hve evidently run afoul of the queer mafia running this asylum. What I am a little more than pissed off about is Xenophrenic's that I am anyones sockpupet, as far`as I am concerned those are borderline fighting words and I wont stand for it. At any rate, please unblock me for the purpose of defneding myself or if any of the invovled want to email me to hear my side please do so: censei@yahoo.com and if not then go fuck yourselves. And if anything else comes of this, take the fucking sockpuppet tag of my user page. ] (]) 18:34, 3 July 2009 (UTC) |decline=As you are not requesting unblock, this is not the appropriate template. This template is for unblock requests. ]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 18:35, 3 July 2009 (UTC)}}
]


Care to elaborate? ] (]) 18:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed|1=no reason given for my block ... is it a mistake?|decline=You are not currently blocked. Please see instructions below to check for an autoblock. You must follow these instructions exactly to help admins find the source of the problem. — ].].] 22:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)}}
:You used the unblock template. But you weren't requesting an unblock. So I disabled it. The other matter doesn't appear relevant; you have been blocked since April, so I cannot imagine how you even happened to notice that checkuser request. You don't appear to be asking for any specific action, and I doubt that anyone is interested enough to email you for 'your side,' since no one was even interested enough to actually run a checkuser. There's no need for you to 'defend yourself;' you're already indefinitely blocked, so nothing more can be done to you- there's nothing to defend yourself from. Your name is vaguely familiar to me, but I don't remember who you are or why you are blocked, and I don't care enough to look at your histories. I can't think of any action which could be taken here that would make the encyclopedia better, so there's no point in taking any action. I hope that is sufficient elaboration for you. -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 18:58, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
'''Clearing an autoblock'''
:: A freind told me about the witchhunt .. I mean checkuser and I was livid when I found out. As for the rest I do feel the need to defend myself. Its a little something called honor, and it would seem that you are as unfmailiar with that concept as you are with me, but I suppose that after seeing your user page your animosity it better understood. ] (]) 19:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
:::As I suspect you know, you are not permitted to remove previous requests if you are still requesting unblock. -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 19:16, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


{{unblock reviewed|1=I am not disputing my block so that I may edit articles, I could quite frankly give a rats ass about Misplaced Pages and/or editing it as I hve evidently run afoul of the queer mafia running this asylum. What I am a little more than pissed off about is Xenophrenic's that I am anyones sockpupet, as far`as I am concerned those are borderline fighting words and I wont stand for it. At any rate, please unblock me for the purpose of defneding myself or if any of the invovled want to email me to hear my side please do so: censei@yahoo.com and if not then go fuck yourselves. And if anything else comes of this, take the fucking sockpuppet tag of my user page. ] (]) 19:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)|decline=Further offensive non-requests will result in this page being protected. This ''is'' where you defend yourself, although you may want to read ] before attempting to do so again, as you're on your last chance. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 19:35, 3 July 2009 (UTC)}}
Due to the nature of the block applied we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are ] or blocked because of your ]. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:


How was my request "offensive"? Please be specific.
# If you have a Misplaced Pages account, please ensure that you are logged in. <br> Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are. <br> If it isn't, try ].
# Try to .
# If you are still blocked, copy the <tt>{&#123;]&#124;...&#125;}</tt> code generated for you under the "'''<u>IP blocked?</u>'''" section. This is usually hidden within the "'''<u>What do I do now?<u>'''" section. If so, just click the "''''''" link to the right hand side to show this text.
# Paste the code at the <u>bottom</u> of ] and click save.


How the hell do I defend myself via the talk page? The action is not here, its over at the RfCu page? This is, btw, and it was as much bullshit then as it is now and ''I am fucking sick of it''. ] (]) 19:47, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. <!-- from ] --> --].].] 22:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
:Read your request back carefully, and see if you can identify anything in it which might hurt the feelings of a reader. I'm confident that you'll find it. -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 19:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

{{tlx|unblock-ip|...}}

::NO NO. Please read and follow ALL Of the steps above. Don't just paste that template from above, read and follow ALL of the instructions, in order. It is important because if you don't do it exactly right, we can't help you fix this problem! --].].] 22:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

::: I would rather people not know where I work, and dont want topost my IP. ] (]) 14:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
:::: Well, then we cannot help unblock you. Sorry, but there is nothing we can do if you don't do this. If you are concerned, I can delete any evidence of your IP address once you have been unblocked, but unless we know what the problematic IP block is, we cannot fix it to allow you to edit. --].].] 18:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
::::: I emailed the blocking admin with all the information. Hopefully that clears things up. ] (]) 18:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

::::::I got your email. The IP address you sent is NOT currently blocked, autoblocked, or rangeblocked. Please check to see if you still cannot edit. If you are still having trouble, please email unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org and reference this talk page. Please tell them EVERYTHING and EVERY DETAIL so that they can help unblock you. --].].] 23:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

== Edit warring at Martin Luther King article ==

You were warned before about edit warring at that article: . Please do not continue to edit war over the inclusion (or not) of the tags in the article. If you continue to do so, and especially if you continue to call the edits of those whom you disagree with vandalism, you may be blocked yet again for edit warring. If you are having trouble, please seek outside help to solve the problem, as described in ]. Please not that being "right" is not an allowable reason for edit warring. So please do not continue to repeatedly force your version of an article on others. --].].] 04:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

==IP==
I have granted your account an ]. This will allow you to edit through ] affecting your ] when you are logged in.

Please read the page ] carefully, especially the section on ].

Note in particular that you are '''not''' permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Misplaced Pages via ], or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. -- ] (]) 19:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

: Thanks. ] (]) 20:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

==Che (film)==
Please see the talk page for my comments. Thanks &nbsp;&nbsp;] (])RT 15:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

== Cyber stalking warning ==

You are bird-dogging all the edits I make, trying to provoke an edit war and then 3RR me. I can easily show this to an admin with the diffs. I suggest you stop doing it. Get a life. ] 01:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

: Feel free to do so if you think it is necessary, but as explained to me, your edit history is open for all to see for a reason, and its pretty clear that you don’t apply the criteria for inclusion in all the articles you edit. ] (]) 01:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

::I think I'll have to ask for an IP check. This is andyvphil redux. I see you started this account right after he was banned too. Hmmm. ] 02:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

::: Well, you'd better have better evidence than "I thin so", and it appears that Andyvphil is still editing so he was never banned. ] (]) 02:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:47, 9 August 2015

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CENSEI (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not disputing my block, I could quite frankly give a rats ass about Misplaced Pages and or editing it as I hve evidently run afoul of the queer mafia running this asylum. What I am a little more than pissed off about is Xenophrenic's bullshit allegations that I am anyones sockpupet, as far`as I am concerned those are borderline fighting words and I wont stand for it. At any rate, please unblock me for the purpose of defneding myself or if any of the invovled want to email me to hear my side please do so: censei@yahoo.com and if not then go fuck yourselves. And if anything else comes of this, take the fucking sockpuppet tag of my user page. CENSEI (talk) 18:34, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As you are not requesting unblock, this is not the appropriate template. This template is for unblock requests. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:35, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Care to elaborate? CENSEI (talk) 18:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

You used the unblock template. But you weren't requesting an unblock. So I disabled it. The other matter doesn't appear relevant; you have been blocked since April, so I cannot imagine how you even happened to notice that checkuser request. You don't appear to be asking for any specific action, and I doubt that anyone is interested enough to email you for 'your side,' since no one was even interested enough to actually run a checkuser. There's no need for you to 'defend yourself;' you're already indefinitely blocked, so nothing more can be done to you- there's nothing to defend yourself from. Your name is vaguely familiar to me, but I don't remember who you are or why you are blocked, and I don't care enough to look at your histories. I can't think of any action which could be taken here that would make the encyclopedia better, so there's no point in taking any action. I hope that is sufficient elaboration for you. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:58, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
A freind told me about the witchhunt .. I mean checkuser and I was livid when I found out. As for the rest I do feel the need to defend myself. Its a little something called honor, and it would seem that you are as unfmailiar with that concept as you are with me, but I suppose that after seeing your user page your animosity it better understood. CENSEI (talk) 19:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
As I suspect you know, you are not permitted to remove previous requests if you are still requesting unblock. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:16, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CENSEI (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not disputing my block so that I may edit articles, I could quite frankly give a rats ass about Misplaced Pages and/or editing it as I hve evidently run afoul of the queer mafia running this asylum. What I am a little more than pissed off about is Xenophrenic's bullshit allegations that I am anyones sockpupet, as far`as I am concerned those are borderline fighting words and I wont stand for it. At any rate, please unblock me for the purpose of defneding myself or if any of the invovled want to email me to hear my side please do so: censei@yahoo.com and if not then go fuck yourselves. And if anything else comes of this, take the fucking sockpuppet tag of my user page. CENSEI (talk) 19:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Further offensive non-requests will result in this page being protected. This is where you defend yourself, although you may want to read this guide before attempting to do so again, as you're on your last chance. Hersfold 19:35, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How was my request "offensive"? Please be specific.

How the hell do I defend myself via the talk page? The action is not here, its over at the RfCu page? This is, btw, not the first time I have been accused of sockpuppetry and it was as much bullshit then as it is now and I am fucking sick of it. CENSEI (talk) 19:47, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Read your request back carefully, and see if you can identify anything in it which might hurt the feelings of a reader. I'm confident that you'll find it. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
User talk:CENSEI: Difference between revisions Add topic