Misplaced Pages

User talk:Eric Corbett: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:13, 11 March 2009 view sourceJimmyButler (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,335 edits Not Yet!: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:05, 16 January 2025 view source Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,311,070 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Eric Corbett/Archives/2024/September, User talk:Eric Corbett/Archives/2024/December) (botTag: Manual revert 
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--{{Notice|The Wikimedia Foundation is not a software development organisation, and ought not to be pretending to be one. Let's try and make that clear to them by a regular Monday boycott until they come to their senses.}}
{|-
{{#ifeq: {{CURRENTDAYNAME}} | Monday | {{wikibreak|message=It's Monday now, so I'll be gone until tomorrow.}} |}}-->
|width="10%" bgcolor="#F8EABA" style="border:1px solid #8F91A1;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
]<center>I am outraged that the ] initiative to level the playing field between the standards of behaviour expected of administrators and non-administrators was taken to ]. It may work, it may not, but the defensive attitudes displayed by some administrators left a bad taste in the mouth. No wonder that so many editors simply walk away from the project in the face of unchecked administrator abuse.<br /><br />The chaotic, inconsistent, abusive, and arbitrary way this project is being policed and run has become unacceptable to me. IP editors are allowed to run amok, yet long-standing contributors are held to standards of behaviour met by very few administrators. If there are ever processes put in place to deal with the children who have taken over the project, then I may consider returning one day. Until then, ''adieu''.</center>
|}

<!--<center> <!--<center>
<div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: #591b00 solid 2px; background: #FCC200; -moz-border-radius: 8px; width:75%;"> <div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: #591b00 solid 2px; background: #FCC200; -moz-border-radius: 8px; width:75%;">
''''''</div>--> ''''''</div>-->
<!--{{Time-UTC-Banner}}--> <!--{{Time-UTC-Banner}}-->

{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadsleft = 0
|algo = old(7d) |algo = old(30d)
|archive = User talk:Malleus Fatuorum/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s |archive = User talk:Eric Corbett/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s
}}
{{archive box|
<small>
<center>'''2007'''<br /></center>
] • ] • ] •] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]<br />
<center>'''2008'''</center>
] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]
<center>'''2009'''</center>
] • ] • ]
</small>
}} }}
{{sidebar with collapsible lists
| outertitle =
| topimage = ]
| bodyclass = hlist
| style = box-shadow: 4px 4px 4px #CCC; border-radius: 8px; background: #F8EABA; font-size: smaller;
| expanded =


| contentstyle = text-align: left;
== Wotcha ==


| heading1
Horribly addictive this place...... <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 21:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
| list1name = 2007
| list1title = 2007 archive
| list1 =
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


| heading2
:I popped in to finish off the GA review I'd started before I was so rudely interrupted. Whether the motivation to do anything else here will return remains to be seen. --] ] 21:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
| list2name = 2008
::I note you at least seem to have found some motivation to edit a popular website that provides critical commentary regarding the Misplaced Pages project..... :) <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 21:32, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
| list2title = 2008 archive
| list2 =
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


| heading3
:::Indeed I have. Quite eye-opening. --] ] 21:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
| list3name = 2009
| list3title = 2009 archive
| list3 =
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


| heading4
. :) That is 50% of the early life page sans discussion of his juvenalia. You can see part way down a section that the Peterloo Massacre should probably be elaborated on. There are some other Manchester things that need to be discussed. I will be working on this more during this week. But yeah. ] (]) 22:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
| list4name = 20010
| list4title = 2010 archive
| list4 =
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


| heading5
:Seems to be coming along nicely. I see that you've got your hands pretty full with Lucy at the moment though. --] ] 22:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
| list5name = 2011
::I don't mind complaints about a need for copyediting, especially when I didn't touch the language since the content was first added. However, I get upset when someone implies that it is the worse thing ever, especially after there were many copyedits by multiple users and there was jargon thrown out that has no connection to their actual use. It is so frustrating. >.< ] (]) 22:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
| list5title = 2011 archive
| list5 =
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


| heading6
== Good article reassessments ==
| list6name = 2012
| list6title = 2012 archive
| list6 =
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


| heading7
Hi, when you delist good articles in the future, could you please also remove the good article ratings from the Wikiprojects? I corrected a dozen old ones. Thanks. ] (]) 22:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
| list7name = 2013
| list7title = 2013 archive
| list7 =
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


| heading8
:The project assessments are nothing to do with me, and nothing to do with any GA review. So to answer your question directly, no I won't. --] ] 22:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
| list8name = 2014
| list8title = 2014 archive
| list8 =
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


| heading9
::In the "Pass" section of ] it says "Also, update the class parameters to "GA" for project templates on the talk page." So the way a Wikiproject tag gets a GA rating is exactly with the GA review process, therefore it makes sense to change the rating with delisting. It would be a lot unnecessary work to go through all of your delistings, as you contribute quite a few and they are reasonable, and this is why I suggested changing the ratings along with the article history. Please reconsider, thank you. ] (]) 22:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
| list9name = 2015
| list9title = 2015 archive
| list9 =
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


| heading10
:::I suggest that it may be better for you to bring this up at ], as I have absolutely no intention of altering any project taggings. How would I decide (or how do ''you'' decide) that a delisted GA should be a B-class, or a C, or whatever? That's a matter for the projects themselves to decide. I'll contribute to the more general discussion when/if you decide to bring this matter up at the GA project. --] ] 22:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
| list10name = 2016
| list10title = 2016 archive
| list10 =
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


| heading11
::::Okay, thanks. ] (]) 22:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
| list11name = 2017
| list11title = 2017 archive
| list11 =
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


| heading12
== Question ==
| list12name = 2018
| list12title = 2018 archive
| list12 =
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


| heading13
Would you mind if I moved you to the list of GM inactive participants? The way I see it, it's not just a list of members who haven't edited for a while, but a roll call of the people who've been a part of the project. While I understand you want to sever your ties with wikipedia, I think it would be right for WP:GM to remember those who've help make it the one of the leading UK projects. Best wishes, ] (]) 01:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
| list13name = 2019
:Whatever you think is best. --] ] 01:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
| list13title = 2019 archive
| list13 =
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


| content35 =
::I have done. Is there any chance of you reversing your request for withdrawal of Baby? I've asked WPGM to look after it, and as long as nothing major pops up, I think we can guide it through. But if you think reviewers wouldn't like to spend their time on an article without it's main writer around, best to withdraw it. ] (]) 01:27, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
{{#tag:inputbox|

bgcolor=transparent
:::If you think that the project can guide it through, then please do so with my blessing. I'll strike my request and you can add something underneath explaining. --] ] 01:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
type=fulltext

prefix={{FULLPAGENAME}}/
== ] ==
break=no

width=22
Hi Malleus, an editor has nominated the above article at FLC, there are concerns about the prose. The prose isn't actually that long, once you take out all the lists and references. I was wondering if you had the time, could you help copy edit it. I did come to wish you well the other day, but your talk page was fully protected (so us mere mortals couldn't edit it :(). Thanks. — ]] 16:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
searchbuttonlabel=Search

}}
:I'm sorry, but I won't be able to help. I'm just tidying up a few loose ends before taking my leave. Whether or not I come back depends on whether or not any real changes are made to the way this place is run. --] ] 18:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
| navbar = none
::I see, and understand. Please return. Best wishes. — ]] 18:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
}}
:::You might want to consider prodding Lara out of retirement for this one. ] is quite good with this kind of list, too. ] (]) 20:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
{{-}}

== Favor ? ==
Hey! Are you still talking to us? :) You're the only outstanding oppose at ], so I'm wondering if you mind saying how strongly you feel about the prose now. If not, I understand. ] (]) 16:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

:Feel free to strike my oppose Sandy. --] ] 18:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

:: Thanks for letting me know; sending you good thoughts and well wishes. ] (]) 18:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

== Song Parody ==

Title: '''Something Happening Here'''<BR>
Artist: '''Malleus and the Wikpedia Review Chorus'''<BR>
Composer: '''Stephen Stills and Barsoom Tork Associates'''<BR>
Midi: <BR>
YouTube: (Buffalo Springfield}<BR>
<BR>
There's something happening here<BR>
What it is ain't exactly clear<BR>
There's a clan with a banhammer there<BR>
Telling me I got to beware<BR>
<BR>
I think it's time we stop, children, what's that sound<BR>
Everybody look what's going down<BR>
<BR>
There's battle lines being drawn<BR>
Nobody's right if everybody's wrong<BR>
Admins making up rules<BR>
Becoming storm-tossed on their Ship of Fools<BR>
<BR>
I think it's time we stop, hey, what's that sound<BR>
Everybody look what's going down<BR>
<BR>
Another page to delete<BR>
A dozen vandals to baleet<BR>
Singing songs with lyrics most snide<BR>
Mostly say, hooray for our side<BR>
<BR>
It's time we stop, hey, what's that sound<BR>
Everybody look what's going down<BR>
<BR>
Paranoia strikes deep<BR>
Into your talk page it creeps<BR>
It starts when you're always too bold<BR>
You step out of line, the ban comes along<BR>
And gives you a scold<BR>
<BR>
We better stop, hey, what's that sound<BR>
Everybody look what's going down<BR>
Stop, hey, what's that sound<BR>
Everybody look what's going down<BR>
Stop, now, what's that sound<BR>
Everybody look what's going down<BR>
Stop, children, what's that sound<BR>
Everybody look what's going down<BR>
<BR>
CopyClef 2009 Stephen Stills and Barsoom Tork Associates.<BR>
Insurrected Wreckware. All songs abused. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 18:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== GAN ==

I gather that you have retired from Misplaced Pages, or are on a break, and will not be doing any Good Article reviews. In light of that I deleted the review page you created for ]. Thanks for all of the contributions you've made to the project. I hope to see you around again. &nbsp; <b>]&nbsp; ]&nbsp; </b> 02:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

== Not Yet! ==

You have become somewhat legendary among my AP class. They enjoy your ruthless wit and writing style! Your assistance to the project does not go unnoticed; it is a point of honor when you take the time to review their efforts. Having you as an ally seems to boost the confidence - they dare not imagine the alternative! Irregardless, know that in out little part of the world your perspective and support is highly respected and appreciated. --] (]) 02:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:05, 16 January 2025

2007 archive
2008 archive
2009 archive
2010 archive
2011 archive
2012 archive
2013 archive
2014 archive
2015 archive
2016 archive
2017 archive
2018 archive
2019 archive
User talk:Eric Corbett: Difference between revisions Add topic