| Revision as of 19:46, 14 March 2009 view sourceYarnalgo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,261 editsm →User:Yarnalgo: no wiki tags← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:20, 21 January 2025 view source MusikBot (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Bots, Mass message senders209,922 edits Bot clerking on 2 requests: archiving (1 approved, 1 denied) (0 open requests remaining) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
<noinclude>{{Short description|Place to request rollback rights}} |
|
<!-- DO NOT ADD REQUESTS HERE. ADD THEM BELOW ***AFTER READING THE INSTRUCTIONS*** --> |
|
|
|
{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}{{WP:PERM/Nav}}{{WP:PERM/Backlog|none}}<!-- do not remove, managed by bot --></noinclude> |
|
<!-- |
|
|
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu INSTRUCTIONS: |
|
|
u" uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu "u Please read the following instructions CAREFULLY: |
|
|
u" u@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@u "u 1. COPY (do NOT CUT!) the following line: |
|
|
u" u@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@u "u |
|
|
u" u@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@u "u {{subst:rfp|Username|2=Reason for requesting rollback}} ~~~~ |
|
|
u" u@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@u "u |
|
|
u" u@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@u "u 2. PASTE it at the TOP of the list. |
|
|
@ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ |
|
|
@ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ 3. Fill in the information. |
|
|
@ @@@" ... "@... ...@" ... "@@@ ... "@@@ @ |
|
|
@ @@@u `"@@@@@@@ @@@ @@@@@ @@ @@@ @@@ @ |
|
|
@ @@@@@@uu "@@@@ @@@ @@@@@ @@ """ u@@@ @ NOTE: Requests that do not meet the above criteria WILL be removed. |
|
|
@ @@@""@@@ @@@@ @@@u "@@@" u@@ @@@@@@@@ @ |
|
|
@ @@@@....,@@@@@..@@@@@....,@@@@..@@@@@@@@ @ |
|
|
@ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ |
|
|
"u "@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@" u" |
|
|
"u "@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@" u" |
|
|
"u "@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@" u" |
|
|
"u "@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@" u" |
|
|
"u "@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@" u" |
|
|
"u """""""""""""""""" u" |
|
|
"""""""""""""""""""" |
|
|
--> |
|
|
<!-- ADD REQUESTS ***BELOW*** THIS LINE. --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
===<span id="rperm-rollback"></span>Rollback=== |
|
|
{{WP:PERM/Subpage|shortcut=R|subpage=Rollback|notice=<noinclude> |
|
|
Please review ''']''' before making a request. Successful applicants will usually have: |
|
|
# At least {{Misplaced Pages:Rollback/Mainspace count}} ] edits. |
|
|
# At least a month of experience patrolling ]. |
|
|
# No recent history of ]. |
|
|
# A track record of consistently ] editors when reverting their edits. |
|
|
The ] is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism. |
|
|
</noinclude>}} |
|
|
<!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks.--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
|
|
|
*{{rfplinks|1=Drdr150}} |
|
===Rollback <small>(<span class="plainlinks"></span>)</small>=== |
|
|
|
I would like the rights to utilise rollback to aid in reverting vandalism more easily. I have seen numerous instances in which someone has added several instances of vandalism on the same page, preventing me from reverting it. I have warned people after their vandalism (if someone else doesn't beat me to it) and have not violated MOS in two years. ] (]) 16:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:{{comment|Automated comment}} This user has <!-- mb-mainSpaceCount -->197<!-- mb-mainSpaceCount-end --> edits in the ]. <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <b>] <sup>]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 19:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
====]==== |
|
|
|
:I just wanted to leave a note that the user has today been auto reported on AIV for tripping edit filter 1311 (https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special%3AAbuseLog&wpSearchUser=Drdr150). Another admin ] looked at the report and believed it to be a false positive. I have just been looking at the contributions too, and also looked like a false positive to me, but then I noted this request, and thought that I should at least mention it here. ] (]) 21:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Yarnalgo}} (]) |
|
|
|
::What I was saying was that while I believed it to be a false pos, I was not familiar enough with what I was reviewing to say so with the highest degree of confidence. ] (]) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
:I've been using Twinkle for a little while and I'd love to be able to use rollback to help fight vandalism. ] <sub>]</sub> 07:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:::I'm not 100% sure what that edit filter is trying to tell us, but I can't see any serious issue with those edits either. Will proceed with {{checking}} if they are otherwise qualified for this user right. ] ] 00:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
::{{admin note}} Are you aware that rollback may be used for blatant ] only and not for ] as you did ? — ] <span style="color: #999;">//</span> ] 10:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:::::{{not done}} With barely 200 mainspace edits, you are right on the line for when we will even consider granting this. I think you are off to a decent start in combatting vandalism, but I think you need a bit more experience before this is granted. I notice someone suggested that you might want to use ] for this and I agree fully with that, it's a great tool for helping users interested in removing vandalism and warning disruptive editors and can help you easily get the kind of experience looked for when evaluating these requests. ] ] 00:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
:::I'm not convinced that edit was good faith, considering the IP's . –] ] ] 14:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
::::Seems to be looking for matches to a old reported sock (])(], but is a likely source of false positives. ] (]) 11:09, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
:::{{done}} after further consideration and examination of the user's contribs. –] ] ] 14:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Incredibly respectful that you ignored the concerns from another admin. Also, incredibly respectful that you did not give the user the time to reply to my question. Incredibly respectful and collegial behaviour. — ] <span style="color: #999;">//</span> ] 15:21, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Sorry...? That edit, while maybe not a blatant attempt to disrupt Misplaced Pages, was far from constructive. And as far as I can tell, you never declined this request. –] ] ] 15:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::As far as I can tell, there is a question left unanswered above. A question that should have been answered before this request is granted/declined. — ] <span style="color: #999;">//</span> ] 15:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Obviously, if I thought this question is irrelevant, I would not have asked it. — ] <span style="color: #999;">//</span> ] 15:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::So if I'm understanding correctly, I'm incredibly disrespectful because I disagree with your opinion? –] ] ] 15:37, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::No, you are not understanding correctly. And if you start twisting my words that won't help. I have asked a question because I consider the answer to it relevant for declining/accepting this request. Ignoring it is uncalled-for. If you can not see that, forget about it. — ] <span style="color: #999;">//</span> ] 15:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::See my comment on your talk page. As an aside, how exactly am I twisting your words? –] ] ] 15:45, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::" I'm incredibly disrespectful because I disagree with your opinion?". Never said that anywhere. — ] <span style="color: #999;">//</span> ] 15:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:(<-) Alright, you've both had your say; can you now back off from each other please? I think both sides should take notes and move on, or move it to your talk pages. Best, <font face="Arial"> ] (])</font> 15:51, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::Not sure if its worth it but just to answer the question, I was reverting that IP's unconstructive edits. He added one valuable sentence which was the origin of the name of the comet (which is already in the lead of the article). The rest of the edit(s) was adding many many blank lines and "<nowiki><ref>Insert footnote text here</ref></nowiki>". Anyway, thanks for the rights and I definitely will only use it for obvious cases unlike this one. --] <sub>]</sub> 19:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|ZooFari}} (]) |
|
|
:I have became addicted to Recent Changes Patrol and would like to try Huggle to try new tools that would make my task at Misplaced Pages easier. I currently use Twinkle and have been using it since my interest in patrol started. '''<font color="navy" size="3" face="comic sans ms">]</font><font size="3" color="darkorange" face="comic sans ms">]</font>''' 00:51, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{done}} –] ] ] 00:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Nz26}} (]) |
|
|
:I requested last week and was denied but told to come back once I have some more edits. I would like to be able to help[REDACTED] more with removing vandalism ] (]) 22:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{admin-note}} Could you please provide a link to your last request? Thanks, — ] <span style="color: #999;">//</span> ] 22:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::. <font face="Arial"> ] (])</font> 22:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{Not done}} Sorry, but you still do not have enough experience in reverting vandalism. Please consider using tools like ] or ] in order to gain some experience in this area before reapplying. — ] <span style="color: #999;">//</span> ] 22:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Will do. Thanks anyway ] (]) 22:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::You're welcome. :) Good luck, — ] <span style="color: #999;">//</span> ] 22:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
|
|
|
*{{usercheck-short|The Cool Kat}} (]) |
|
|
:I was asigned rollback rights back if Feburary but they removed for misuse, i would like a second chance to prove responsibility (see discussion at ]). ] (]) 19:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{not done}} I'd like you to wait a week or two after the original removal before regranting the tool. Best, <font face="Arial"> ] (])</font> 19:04, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|kyle1278}} (]) |
|
|
:I would love to help Misplaced Pages revert vandalism and keep Misplaced Pages as clean as possible. ] (]) 16:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{done}} –] ] ] 16:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Syjytg}} (]) |
|
|
:I would like to revert vandalism. ] (]) 14:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{notdone}}. A quick look at your contribs reveals several reversion of good-faith edits, such as , with only the default edit summary. Aside from this, I see very little vandal-fighting experience. –] ] ] 15:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::Also, you were blocked for edit warring about a week ago. –] ] ] 15:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::: I was asked to reapply 1 week after the block, which was exactly what I am doing. ] (]) 15:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::That's fine, but I still don't believe you can be trusted with the tool at the moment. –] ] ] 15:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|EronMain}} (]) |
|
|
:Requesting rollback for reversion of vandalism. ]<sup>]</sup> 04:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{done}} –] ] ] 04:32, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Smenge32}} (]) |
|
|
:Would like to use ] to do some anti-vandalism work. ] (]) 02:44, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:*{{notdone}}. Sorry, but have very little vandal-fighting experience. Please continue to use undo/twinkle for a few days and re-apply for rollback. Regards, –] ] ] 02:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Ladyofwisdom}} (]) |
|
|
:To revert vandalism, i use lupin's tool to revert vandalism. ] <sup>]</sup> 01:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
: |
|
|
::{{notdone}}. Sorry, but you only have 28 edits, which is below the general standard. Please re-apply in a few weeks once you have some more experience. Cheers, –] ] ] 02:00, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Techman224}} (]) |
|
|
:I have been revoked from using rollback, however I fell that I can be trusted with it now that I've been using twinkle ever since ]] 22:05, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::You really should ask the administrator who removed it. ]]] 22:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::He said that the best thing to do was to request it again here. See ] for more of the details. ]] 22:25, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Okay, sorry. ]]] 22:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
Is anyone going to respond soon? ]] 21:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{Done}}. I have reviewed your reverts made after the incident and they all looked okay. Thus, I have regranted the permission per ]. Though, I have to ask you to be more careful than you used to be and to take the concerns given by the revoking administrator seriously. If the tool is abused again, it's very likely that it will be revoked for a much longer period of time. — ] <span style="color: #999;">//</span> ] 22:33, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Hipocrite}} (]) |
|
|
:I want to do some ]. ] (]) 18:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::I think you might be misunderstanding the purpose of rollback. Rollback is to quickly revert vandalism. For NPP, you might want to check out ]. Regards, –] ] ] 18:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::: I'm fully aware of what rollback is for. I find that NPP somehow always lands me at some spamhaven of vanispamcruft. I swear to only use rollback on obvious vandalism forever and ever amen. ] (]) 18:12, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::: PS - stuck with a stock computer here so no NPW. ] (]) 18:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Alright then, sorry about that. {{done}}. –] ] ] 18:16, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|DougsTech}} (]) |
|
|
:To revert vandalism in recent changes. ] (]) 23:57, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::I have asked {{admin|PeterSymonds}} to comment as he revoked your rollback privileges in August of 2008. ] <sup>]</sup> 00:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Okay, I've given this a lot of thought, and have decided to ] here. Your rights were revoked in August during the AN discussion, and you have been denied rollback since. Reasons: inactivity since losing the flag in the first place; edit warring to keep a rollback userbox despite not having the right (which you wisely removed later on); a block for abusing other scripts. Therefore I'm marking this request as {{done}}, providing you do not show such behaviour in the future. Your reverts have been good so far, but I should warn that rollback can and will be removed instantly if you misuse it again. Good luck, <font face="Arial"> ] (])</font> 00:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::'''Comment''' Since his request in January for Rollback, which was ], DougsTech has reverted about five undeleted edits, one of which was a {{diff|title=Prestonpans|diff=prev|oldid=264552528|label=good faith section blank}}. ] (]) 00:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::'''Endorse''' PS's decision. Rollback is easy come, easy go. –] ] ] 00:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Wronkiew, I am curious how you find the removal of that entire section good-faith? It appears as obvious vandalism. ] (]) 00:46, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::The explanation is a little complex, and it's easy to see why several other editors made the same mistake you did. Luckily, ] wasn't blocked for it. Some IP {{diff|title=Prestonpans|diff=prev|oldid=263847563|label=added an external link}} above the infobox. Then, ] {{diff|title=Prestonpans|diff=prev|oldid=263847617|label=whacked}} both the infobox and the link. Another IP came along and {{diff|title=Prestonpans|diff=next|oldid=263847617|label=copied in}} the infobox for another town. Obymunch saw the mistake and {{diff|title=Prestonpans|diff=next|oldid=264550963|label=removed}} the bad infobox. This led to an edit war between him and several rollbackers, which was exacerbated by the lack of edit summaries. Eventually, ] figured out what was going on and restored the correct infobox. ] (]) 01:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Yousaf465}} (]) |
|
|
:I use Twinkle to revert vandalism in the recent changes, but often javascript casuses errors,thus denys me the use of rollback to combat vandalism. ] (]) 20:09, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{done}} ''''']]]''''' 20:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:: A look at reveals that he has been blocked three times allegedly for edit warring and POV inclusion-<font style="color:white;background:black;" size="4" face="Monotype Corsiva">]</font><sub><font color="red" face="Monotype Corsiva">]</font></sub> 07:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Eh, if he/she abuses the tool, it can be removed just as easily as granted. No harm done. –] ] ] 13:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Just keep an eye on him. ;) ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 05:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Sk8er5000}} (]) |
|
|
:I applied the other day as Teen Sleepover Kid, and was told to come back when I had more edits. Well, I have a lot more vandal reverts, and would like Rollback to use Huggle, and also because Firefox has started not to like Rollback. ] (]) 19:38, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{done}} ] (]) 19:55, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|I Grave Rob}} (]) |
|
|
:I use Twinkle to revert vandalism in the recent changes, but often my Firefox doesn't work which denys me the use of rollback to combat vandalism. '''<font size="2">]'''</font>{{User:I Grave Rob/April Fools}}<sub>]</sub></font><span style="color:red">♥</span><sup>]</sup> 12:46, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{done}} –] ] ] 13:43, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Fattonyni}} (]) |
|
|
:Easier vandalism reverts ] (]) 11:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{done}}. concerns me a bit, but you seem to have adequate experience. –] ] ] 13:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Djanga}} (]) |
|
|
:Vandalism reverts ] 02:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{done}} ] 02:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Beantwo}} (]) |
|
|
:To use ] for recent unproductive edits ] (]) 01:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{done}} –] ] ] 01:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Glenn L}} (]) |
|
|
:To use ] to clean up various areas I frequently visit ] (]) 06:21, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{done}} <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 11:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Kehrbykid}} (]) |
|
|
:Would like to use ] to take down vandals. ] (]) 02:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{done}} –] ] ] 03:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Wtmitchell}} (]) |
|
|
:Would like to use ] |
|
|
::{{done}} Please remember to only use rollback for ''clear'' cases of ]. Cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 02:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{Usercheck-short|Firestorm}} (]) |
|
|
:I frequently patrol Recent Changes, and I think Rollback would help me to more efficiently revert clear cases of vandalism. For most things, Twinkle is sufficient, but Rollback is faster and less taxing on the server for clear-cut cases of vandalism. <span style="font-family:Copperplate Gothic Bold">] <sup>]</sup></span> 02:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{done}} –] ] ] 02:27, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
I would like the rights to utilise rollback to aid in reverting vandalism more easily. I have seen numerous instances in which someone has added several instances of vandalism on the same page, preventing me from reverting it. I have warned people after their vandalism (if someone else doesn't beat me to it) and have not violated MOS in two years. Drdr150 (talk) 16:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 197 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot 19:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Checking... if they are otherwise qualified for this user right. Beeblebrox 00:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done With barely 200 mainspace edits, you are right on the line for when we will even consider granting this. I think you are off to a decent start in combatting vandalism, but I think you need a bit more experience before this is granted. I notice someone suggested that you might want to use TWINKLE for this and I agree fully with that, it's a great tool for helping users interested in removing vandalism and warning disruptive editors and can help you easily get the kind of experience looked for when evaluating these requests. Beeblebrox 00:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
