| Revision as of 14:47, 24 May 2009 editSmartse (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators49,647 edits speedy deletion of transtek← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:57, 21 July 2024 edit undoفيصل (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users841 edits Notification: listing of Abdulsalam Haykal at WP:Articles for deletion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Sockpuppet investigation == | |||
| Hello Levanteditor. Before you blanked your talk page, you asked me why I tagged it with a ] warning. Your question was: | |||
| ⚫ | Hello Levanteditor: I've opened a sockpuppet investigation in which your account is named. See ]. ] <sup>(]·])</sup> 22:37, 8 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::Hello Sir: My question is that, what do you mean I have a conflict of interest? Sorry if my question bothered you. 77.245.3.99 (talk) 4:56 pm, 16 May 2009, last Saturday (3 days ago) (UTC−5) | |||
| : Why is that? ] (]) 16:51, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Fair use rationale for File:Fwfrontcover1.gif== | |||
| It's no bother at all and quite a legitimate thing to ask. So, even though your question no longer appears in the current version of your talk page, I owe you this reply. | |||
| ] | |||
| Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ] but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to ] and edit it to include a ]. | |||
| If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] (] 05:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| In the interest of context, I actually posted two warnings, one for ] and the other for ]. Correspondingly, I also marked each article with ''<nowiki>{{COI}}</nowiki>'' tags that refer to apparent conflicts by both yourself and {{lu|Nora abazed}}. | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Transtek logo.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| In several of your substantive contributions, you write material that could only be known by someone who is close to each of these subjects. By "close", I mean having knowledge that would not be found in an independent, ] and ] source or known commonly. For example, look at the opening sentence in . (What source published the locale of origin of the subject's ancestors?) Contributors having such proximity to a subject – especially a living person – are invariably troubled by Misplaced Pages's requirement for ]. Contributions to an article about a ] by the subject himself are discouraged in the strongest terms. | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ] – 50 minutes after it was established – was to create the article about Mr. Haykal. Since then, essentially all of your account activity has been in pursuit of Mr. Haykal's direct and indirect interests: Transtek, ], ]. Recent edit activity has included more of his indirect interests, such as categorizing WEF YGL honorees, of which he is one. Evaluating actions only and not intent, your ] projects aspects of Mr. Haykal's life onto Misplaced Pages. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| When these issues are viewed together, alongside your comment about interviewing Mr. Haykal (regarding which, see ]), your contributions create a vivid appearance of conflict. I'm happy to debate this with you if you'd like, yet it's hard to imagine a contrary position that would pass the ]. In my experience, an account prosecutes a contribution agenda such as yours only if its owner has a personal or professional interest in the content it's creating. | |||
| Given that you and ] are the primary authors of these two articles, it's appropriate that the <nowiki>{{COI}}</nowiki> article tags remain in place. | |||
| If you'd like to take this discussion to the articles' talk pages or to ] and solicit comments from the editorial community-at-large, I'd be happy to do so. Perhaps others who are watching this talk page will comment here. | |||
| Finally, in case I haven't said this: assuming that the articles' contents are factually correct and verifiable, I do believe that both Transtek and Mr. Haykal possess sufficient notability to warrant inclusion. The process by which they're constructed, however, is as important as its result. | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| :: Thank you for the clarification. I think your concern is ligitimate, however, it's a little too far fetched. There are endless sources on Haykal in Arabic, a language I can read and write. I suggest you flag the entry for deletion as this is better than flagging it as conflict of interest material. Otherwise, you can do your own research and edit the article accordingly. Best regards, Tom ] (]) 20:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Also on neutrality, check the last part of the first version that I edited under the title controversy. That was later removed by another editor. My pattern of editing is because I'm only a beginner; that's all. Tom ] (]) 20:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::A handful of points in response: | |||
| ::::*What exactly is "far-fetched" (your phrase)? If my facts or analysis are wrong, please say specifically what and why. | |||
| ::::*You claim to be a beginner, yet you've contributed since July, 2008 – longer than many experienced editors – and often cooperatively with {{lu|Nora abazed}} and sometimes, {{lu|Quinn56}}. In what way are you a beginner? | |||
| ::::*The hyperbole ("endless sources") isn't convincing. What substance backs this up? | |||
| ::::*You've still not explained why, given the description of conflict above, the <nowiki>{{COI}}</nowiki> tag should not appear on the article. | |||
| ::::I've raised the issue of your COI-editing on ]. Let's see what other members of the community have to say about it. You're most welcome, of course, to contribute to the discussion there. ] <sup>(]·])</sup> 05:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ]<!-- use ] for YELLOW flag --> A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please ]. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the ]. | |||
| If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to the top of the article ('''just below''' the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Misplaced Pages guidelines. | |||
| For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria ], ], ], or ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn --> ] (]) 14:47, 24 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:57, 21 July 2024
Sockpuppet investigation
Hello Levanteditor: I've opened a sockpuppet investigation in which your account is named. See Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nora_abazed. Jim Ward 22:37, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Why is that? Levanteditor (talk) 16:51, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Fwfrontcover1.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fwfrontcover1.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Transtek logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Transtek logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Abdulsalam Haykal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdulsalam Haykal is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Abdulsalam Haykal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.