Misplaced Pages

User talk:Piotrus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:27, 21 June 2009 editOstap R (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled5,021 edits Afd: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:02, 21 January 2025 edit undoDYKUpdateBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Administrators250,120 edits Giving DYK credit for Retelling on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|minthreadsleft = 0
|algo = old(7d)
|archive = User talk:Piotrus/Archive 29 |algo = old(5d)
|archive = User talk:Piotrus/Archive 70
}} }}


{{User:Piotrus/Talkheader}} {{User:Piotrus/Top}}


{{tinc}}
== DYK for 1920 Georgian coup attempt ==
<center>


]
{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
]
|-
|]
| On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
|}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYKNom --> ]<sup>]</sup>] 22:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC)


{| style="border: 1px solid; background-color: #eee;" class="toccolours" align="center"
== ] ==
| align="center" | ] ''You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the ] today.''
|}


{| class="messagebox" style="background-color: AntiqueWhite;"
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced ]: ''']'''. Our ] requires that all content be ] to a ]. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --] (]) 00:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
|-

| This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''7''' days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) are archived manually when I get around to it.
== Dziwożona - thanks :) ==

Thanks for the help on ] - much appreciated! ] (]) 21:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

I ticked this for DYK, but I think the language re Bronze Night incident needs to be tidied up in the article itself - see my comment on the DYK discussion page. Good work. Cheers. ] (]) 23:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

== re: Jan Władysław Dawid ==

Thank you for the kind comment. I will give the expansion a go and make a nomination sometime soon. Calaka (talk) 09:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
:As an update from the above comment, I did a bit of work on the article so feel free to take a look at the page and tell me what you think. I would have added more sources but I am hindered by my inability to read Polish (fluently anyway, I get a few bits and pieces like glos = voice etc.) so if you wanted to add more sources to substantiate/add depth to the article by all means (there is this but not sure how trustworthy is the sight: ). Finally I found this image via Google images: , is there any way you know of that you can confirm that is Jan and if the image is in the public domain (I am guessing it is, but not sure how all this copyright stuff works). If so, feel free to either let me know and I will put the image up or you can do it yourself. Kind regards. ] (]) 10:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
::Have gone ahead and nominated it: ], hopefully there will be a response soon. Also, I uploaded the picture on commons but it is giving me an error and says the file will be deleted in 7 days unless I fix it... not sure what I did wrong though! ] (]) 09:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
:::Never mind, I figured it out! Now I will upload the pick to his page and also to the DYK listing I made. Cheers and thanks again for the suggestion, without which I probably wouldn't have gone to fixing up the article to a start level. ] (]) 09:47, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

== ]<span style="display:none;">''Misplaced Pages Signpost''</span><span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: '''15 June 2009'''</span> ==

{{colbegin|2}}

* Book review :]
* News and notes: ]
* Misplaced Pages in the news: ]
* WikiProject report: ]
* Discussion report: ]
* Features and admins: ]
* Technology report: ]
* Arbitration report: ]
{{colend}}
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' &middot; ] &middot; ]</div>

<small>Delivered by ] (]) at 12:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)</small>

== DYK for Human rights in Estonia ==

{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
|- |-
|}
|]
|On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
|} ] (]) 14:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


== ] ==


{| id="toc" style="margin: 0 2em 0 2em;"
Cześć Piotrus :) I see you also commented "Keep" at the AfD for the above. I was wondering whether, as a Polish speaker, you could add inline citations to the article from some of the Polish news coverage I mentioned in the deletion discussion? I can't read Polish myself, but I think a bulkier reference section on the article might help it do better in the deletion discussion. ] (]) 16:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
! align="left" style="background-color: #ffd700;" width="100%" |
Please start all new discussions at the bottom of this page and include a heading. When in doubt, click the "" button above.
|}
{| id="toc" style="margin: 0 2em 0 2em;"
! align="left" style="background-color: #ccf;" width="100%" |
If I left you a message on your talk page, please answer it there by indenting one line and starting your response with a ]: <nowiki>{{Ping|Piotrus}}</nowiki> If you leave me a message here on my talk page, I will answer your message here by pinging you.
|}
{| id="toc" style="margin: 0 2em 0 2em;"
! align="left" style="background-color: #ffd700;" width="100%" |
Always ] your message (by clicking the sign button or by typing four tildes, like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). Thanks in advance.
|}
</center>


<!--<div style="background-color: #eee; border: thin solid Black; padding: 2pt; margin-bottom: 4pt;">
== "Duchy" of Stolp ==
]
Talk archives:
{{collapsetop}}
], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]
{{collapsebottom}}
</div>-->
{{archives|banner=yes|list=|small=|prefix=|root=User_talk:Piotrus}}


<div style="border: 1px solid #ADFF2F; background-color: #FFF5EE; color: Black; padding: 0.5em 1em;">
This actually never was a separate duchy, but was always a part of the Duchy of Pomerania. At times, several brothers/cousins/uncles from the ducal house of Pomerania ruled this duchy in common, with each of them satisfied with a distinct share where they were de facto independent rulers in respect to the inner affairs of their respective share, and were all addressed as dukes. But these shares never had the status of a duchy, but were just shares of the same duchy. This practice is called ''Realteilung'' (="real sharing"). The CoA you introduced was not the one of this (nonexistant) duchy, but the one of Stolp City.
{{wstress3d|2|250|Reasons for my raising ]:<br><br>]}}
] mistress :)]]
<div style="padding-left:4px;"><div style="height: 450px; width: 300px; overflow: auto; background-color: #F5FFFA; border: 1px solid #aaa; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 85%;">__TOC__</div></div>


{{clear}}
I therefore redirected the page to Duchy of Pomerania again and hope you don't mind. Regards ] (]) 16:52, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
<center>I agree to the ].</center>


==Lurking stats ==
:But the issue is already covered in the ] article, and also in ], and the dukes are listed in ]. Why create a content fork. I agree that this is notable, but it is already sufficiently covered.
:FYI: ''Fürstentum'' = principality; ''Herzogtum'' = duchy.
{| class=wikitable style="background-color:rgba(0,0,255,0.1); margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"
:The hits you provided are 6 for Fürstentum and 49 fur Herzogtum Stolp. They result from laziness/inaccuracy of the authors, compare to 494 hits for , indicating that it was a part-duchy and not a separate one. ] (]) 17:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
! Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days

To keep the discussion centered, let's continue on ], ok? ] (]) 17:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

== DYK for Black Procession ==

{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
|- |-
| {{ PageViews graph | 90 | User talk:Piotrus | en.wikipedia.org }} <BR>
|]
|}
|On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
|} ] (]) 20:35, 17 June 2009 (UTC)


== Ten no Hate Made – Poland Hishi ==
== Request ==


hello! i read through your GA review of ''ten no hate made''. i don't mind assisting with some of the japanese, but i'm going in relatively blind, having only read ''versailles, claudine,'' and ''oniisama e...'' i'm a little pre-occupied right now, but if you can point me in the direction for what you need or give me some sources to work from, i'd be happy to help any way i can! ] (]) 13:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Could you please rewrite and attribute the sentences you copied from this source at ] and at ]. Diffs of insertion: , . These are copyright violations. Details at ]. Sincerely, ] (]) 21:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

:While I have not asked you to remember every copyvio you have committed, we seem to disagree about where the burden of repair lies. You have quickly repaired these yourself in the past , , but you are now taking a different approach (Feel free to fix ). Could you explain why you addressed these problems so quickly in the previous cases, but do not now feel obligated to repair them yourself? ] (]) 23:22, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

::Here are a couple more from the same source: , . If you don't see yourself as having the time to address these problems within, say, a week after they are identified, I could adopt a policy of posting them at the copyright problems pages instead. ] (]) 19:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

:::] article: As a member of Radziwiłł family, like his predecessors Jerzy also managed to increase his estate, which after his death was inherited by his only son Mikołaj "the Red" Radziwiłł. He had two daughters, of which the younger Barbara Radziwiłł became mistress and later queen to King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania Zygmunt II August, which greatly strengthened the Radziwiłł family's position in Poland and Lithuania.

:::Source: Like his predecessors, Jerzy also managed to increase his estate, which after his death was inherited by his only son Mikolaj IV Rudy (the Red). Of Jerzy's two daughters, the younger Barbara (*1520, †1551) became mistress and later queen to King Zygmunt II August of Poland, thus greatly enhancing the family's position in Lithuania. Diff of insertion:

:::] article: He provided financial support for the printing of the first complete Polish translation of the Bible in 1563, colporated works written in defense of the Reformed faith, financed a magnificent church and college in Vilnius, supported educated Protestants, and in various other ways fostered the Calvinist faith.

:::Source: ] He financed the printing of the first Polish translation of the Bible (in 1563), diffused works written in defense of the Reformed faith, erected a magnificent church and college at Vilnius, supported learned Protestants, and in many other ways fostered the Calvinist faith. Diff of insertion: ] (]) 19:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

::::Thanks - ] (]) 15:39, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

== Re:Nanuli Shevardnadze ==

Hi. I will try to expand it, but the sources are rather scarce, even in Georgian. Cheers, --]<sup>]</sup> 15:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

Regarding . Could you point out in which way the evidence I provided is "extremely poor"? Every diff is a revert, and thus evidence of edit warring. Or do you claim otherwise? Edit warring is something Digwuren was blocked for earlier. ] (]) 18:24, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

An earlier comment from you: . Could you please provide diffs of "continuing harassment of Digwuren by Offliner"? When have I started "baseless threads" about him? Or, when had I indeed started ''a single'' thread about him before that one at ], or the one at Tiptoety's talk page (where asked me to take to matter to ])? Please provide evidence for your accusations. ] (]) 18:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

== Eastern Europe ==

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
* ];
* ].

Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> ] <sup>]</sup> 19:29, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

== Happy birthday! ==

{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 2px dashed #FF0000; background-color: lightblue;"
|align="center"|]
|align="center" width="100%"|<font face="Comic Sans MS" font color="darkblue">Hey, <b> {{PAGENAME}}. </b> Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the ]! <br> Have a great day!</font>-- ] (]) 14:29, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
|align="right"|]
|}


:@] Much appreciated. I don't know if there are any academic works mentioning this in Japanese, but I'd expect there should be at least some reviews or such? I'd be very curious if there was any commentary by Japanese reviewers on the choice of subject matter (Polish history), which is very rare in Japan, but I'll settle for just learning what the reviewers said (assuming any can be found). Versailles is pretty famous, so I'd think someone would notice that spin off... <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 13:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:Happy birthday, Piotrus. Wish you best of luck. --]<sup>]</sup> 16:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
::no worries! a cursory google search returned mostly book shops, but i'll see if i can dig for anything more.--] (]) 15:03, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:::@] Based on my experience with Polish sources, a lot will be non-digitized (particularly considering the age of this). For Polish sources, I often stumble upon mentions of old reviews and such through google book snippets - then I ask a colleague in Poland to go the library and scan stuff for me. Not sure how that will work for Japanese language sources. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 01:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
::::ok understood, i'll do the same. i might be able to find something in the otaku district here too. i'll do my best!--] (]) 04:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::@] Thanks. I am curious to find what sources, if any exist. I'd assume there would be outlets in Japan that would publish reviews of manga; if not academic (ex. Polish equivalent would be '']'') then presumably in otaku manga magazines and fanzines, which I'd expect to be pretty popular in Japan. ] has many options, and there is also ], some of which could publish reviews. The big issues is how digitized they are, given that most editions were published in the 1990s. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 06:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::@] A collegue send me a lists of potential reviews found by an AI, although (1) I am not sure if they are reliable and (2) they probably are not the old reviews, but some new ones?
::::: https://ameblo.jp/aisharyoko/entry-12651478782.html
::::: https://honkuimusi.hatenablog.com/entry/2022/09/22/080000
::::: https://booklive.jp/product/index/title_id/215654/vol_no/001
::::: https://renta.papy.co.jp/renta/sc/frm/item/39527/
::::: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13255241
::::: http://blog.happyblossom.boo.jp
::::: https://booklog.jp/item/1/4022607483 <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 01:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::@] thank you kindly! i'll look through these this week. i went to the otaku district here but couldn't find any old magazines carrying reviews, but did find cheap copies of the manga with some kind of accompanying text which may contain something useful.--] (]) 12:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)


==DYK for Polish prisoners of war in World War II==
== Afd ==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''']''' were held not only by Nazi Germany but also by the Soviet Union?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> —] (]) 12:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)


==DYK for Retelling==
Piotrus, there is agreement among me and users Jacurek and Radeksz to do an afd for "]" Not sure if you agree with the deletion, but if you do would you set up the afd? I have no idea how to and neither does Jacurek (he said to ask you), and honestly I don't really care to learn :) ] 19:27, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the ''']''' of stories can focus on female characters to reflect the ] perspective?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 12:02, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:02, 21 January 2025

This user wrote 632 DYKs: 632 This user wrote 82 Good-class articles.: 82 This user wrote 6 A-class articles.: 6 =This user wrote 22 Featured-class articles.: 22
There is no Cabal

You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Misplaced Pages Signpost today.
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.


Please start all new discussions at the bottom of this page and include a heading. When in doubt, click the "New Section" button above.

If I left you a message on your talk page, please answer it there by indenting one line and starting your response with a ping: {{Ping|Piotrus}} If you leave me a message here on my talk page, I will answer your message here by pinging you.

Always sign your message (by clicking the sign button or by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~). Thanks in advance.

Archiving icon

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70


This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Reasons for my raising wikistress:

Some general observations on Misplaced Pages governance being broken and good editors trampled by the system
Misplaced Pages is a kawaii mistress :)
I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms.

Lurking stats

Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

Detailed traffic statistics

Ten no Hate Made – Poland Hishi

hello! i read through your GA review of ten no hate made. i don't mind assisting with some of the japanese, but i'm going in relatively blind, having only read versailles, claudine, and oniisama e... i'm a little pre-occupied right now, but if you can point me in the direction for what you need or give me some sources to work from, i'd be happy to help any way i can! Plifal (talk) 13:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

@Plifal Much appreciated. I don't know if there are any academic works mentioning this in Japanese, but I'd expect there should be at least some reviews or such? I'd be very curious if there was any commentary by Japanese reviewers on the choice of subject matter (Polish history), which is very rare in Japan, but I'll settle for just learning what the reviewers said (assuming any can be found). Versailles is pretty famous, so I'd think someone would notice that spin off... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
no worries! a cursory google search returned mostly book shops, but i'll see if i can dig for anything more.--Plifal (talk) 15:03, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
@Plifal Based on my experience with Polish sources, a lot will be non-digitized (particularly considering the age of this). For Polish sources, I often stumble upon mentions of old reviews and such through google book snippets - then I ask a colleague in Poland to go the library and scan stuff for me. Not sure how that will work for Japanese language sources. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
ok understood, i'll do the same. i might be able to find something in the otaku district here too. i'll do my best!--Plifal (talk) 04:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
@Plifal Thanks. I am curious to find what sources, if any exist. I'd assume there would be outlets in Japan that would publish reviews of manga; if not academic (ex. Polish equivalent would be Nowe Książki) then presumably in otaku manga magazines and fanzines, which I'd expect to be pretty popular in Japan. Category:Literary magazines published in Japan has many options, and there is also Category:Manga magazines published in Japan, some of which could publish reviews. The big issues is how digitized they are, given that most editions were published in the 1990s. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
@Plifal A collegue send me a lists of potential reviews found by an AI, although (1) I am not sure if they are reliable and (2) they probably are not the old reviews, but some new ones?
https://ameblo.jp/aisharyoko/entry-12651478782.html
https://honkuimusi.hatenablog.com/entry/2022/09/22/080000
https://booklive.jp/product/index/title_id/215654/vol_no/001
https://renta.papy.co.jp/renta/sc/frm/item/39527/
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13255241
http://blog.happyblossom.boo.jp
https://booklog.jp/item/1/4022607483 Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
@Piotrus thank you kindly! i'll look through these this week. i went to the otaku district here but couldn't find any old magazines carrying reviews, but did find cheap copies of the manga with some kind of accompanying text which may contain something useful.--Plifal (talk) 12:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Polish prisoners of war in World War II

On 19 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Polish prisoners of war in World War II, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Polish prisoners of war in World War II were held not only by Nazi Germany but also by the Soviet Union? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Polish prisoners of war in World War II. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Polish prisoners of war in World War II), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Ganesha811 (talk) 12:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Retelling

On 21 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Retelling, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the retelling of stories can focus on female characters to reflect the feminist perspective? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Retelling. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Retelling), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:02, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
User talk:Piotrus: Difference between revisions Add topic