Revision as of 00:06, 27 August 2009 edit74.62.38.20 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 14:13, 9 December 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,933,077 editsm →top: Category:Articles with conflicting quality ratings: -Start, keep C; cleanupTag: AWB |
(242 intermediate revisions by 84 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
==Started in 2003 or 2006?== |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
The current info contradicts itself. ] (]) 21:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject London |importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Russia |importance=Mid |econ=yes |tech=yes |media=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Companies|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Internet|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Internet culture|importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Gender studies|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Apps|importance=high}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Websites|importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Software|importance=high}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Old XfD multi|date=27 August 2009 (UTC)|result='''no consensus'''|page=Badoo}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{tan}} |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
|
|counter = 2 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|
|algo = old(90d) |
|
|
|archive = Talk:Badoo/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Need a good friendship == |
|
==South Korea== |
|
|
As Agoust 10, Badoo is still unavailable from South Korean IP's. It looks like is having a php problem. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:33, 10 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How do I improve Badoo page ] (]) 13:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC) |
|
==Notability== |
|
|
This is now a site within the top 100 on Alexa and has featured in a report on Yahoo finance. I believe it now has sufficient notablity to be an article. ] 13:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==A Rewrite?== |
|
|
The current entry totally looks like an advertisement, or typed up by someone at Badoo. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:14, 25 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Dead link== |
|
|
The reference No. 4 is a dead link. The Yahoo article has expired. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:30, 8 December 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Badoo data mining! == |
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect the numbers on Badoo are pure hype! I apear to be a member even tho' I've never signed up or responded to any mail.... I'm sure it's pure cut and past info from numerous failed dating and networking sites! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::Yes, I totally agree. The data is highly questionable. I only found out about Badoo because of their annoying spam. This article is an obvious advertisement for them, so I've put a cleanup tag at the top, in line with the various criticisms on this talk page. ] (]) 22:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Yes, and this warrants a change of the site's definition from "social networking site" to "scam." Unless we try to define something like "involuntary social networking" as a type of business activity. Most of the "members" are being harvested and signed up automatically and without their consent via links in spam emails, which create usernames and passwords for them. |
|
|
|
|
|
== Spam == |
|
|
I see there is modification wars going around whether or not the "invitation" messages are spam. My personal experience couldn't be more telling; I got one of these "messages" telling me I've got a friend message at Badoo. Trying to see it I was forced to register. After registering there was NONE massages!! This is total scam, don't give ANY of your personal info to this site..... --] (]) 01:22, 7 June 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Yes, I had a similar thing - although I didn't bother registering, I could tell it was spam. |
|
|
|
|
|
:It's a bit of a difficult situation when it comes to articles like this. Badoo isn't a proper social networking site, it's just a small money-making scam - the claim that it has 22 million users is clearly rubbish. It's possible that a large number of people have been conned into registering, as you were, but I can't believe it's in the millions. So really the only piece of information the reader needs is "This is a scam site - avoid." But you're always going to get a few energetic users like Geeria (who is actually not a registered user, and whose only contribution to[REDACTED] has been to advertise Badoo) dragging us into a time-wasting edit war. |
|
|
|
|
|
:I suppose we need to ask an administrator to block the page. It's really an abuse of[REDACTED] to be PR-ing a scam site like this. And the unsigned and non-existent users who revert our edits are unsurprisingly refusing to discuss this on the talk page. |
|
|
|
|
|
:By the way, 81.197.76.159, it would help if you signed your edits too. |
|
|
:] (]) 20:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::Thanks for the answer, I thought that was the case with Geeria, and Badoo indeed.. Just dislike the publicity on my part ;) But if it must be done to kill scams.. |
|
|
::Oh, just noticed I dont even have an account, created. I have an older account at WP FI --] (]) 23:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I have had the spam experience as well, the spam part is true. ], stop acting like an *-Hole arguing it's not proven and leave it there, it's true, they do exactly that. They trick new subscribees into giving away their login credentials to MSN and whetever else and spamming their entire cointact lists. |
|
|
:] (]) |
|
|
|
|
|
: Wow, I am so glad to see I am not alone. I am absolutely incensed by this article. It is blatant advertising and I can't understand why it is still there. I have added a paragraph about this which will no doubt be removed by the badoo representatives. How can we get rid of this? --] (]) 23:53, 22 August 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Do not delete == |
|
|
I have received such a phony email as well, and wondering what it was as I suspected something fishy, I went to[REDACTED] to see what it said about it. The article confirmed my doubts. Therefore it is a useful article. --] (]) 06:58, 24 August 2009 (UTC) {{UnsignedIP|86.200.170.249}} <small>This user is '''NOT''' ]</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
I totally agree with this comment. This article is also referenced from other pages as 'proof' that Badoo is a spam site. Rob <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
: I think I see what you are saying. You are saying in not so many words that truth should prevail. Badoo is a real entity therefore it is valid to have an article about it? But that article has to reflect the truth, that Badoo is pushing itself by less than ethical means. I guess once you have $30m invested there is a lot of pressure to succeed by fair means or foul. ] (]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 12:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|