| Revision as of 23:32, 28 August 2009 editMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 edits →Dinkytown: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:47, 15 January 2025 edit undoDuckmather (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,443 edits Notification: listing of 亞 at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|date=1 April 2023}} | |||
| generic {{tl|talkheader}}: | |||
| {{Archives|bot=MiszaBot III|age=30|auto=no|large=yes}} | |||
| {{talkheader}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | |||
| |m | |||
| axarchivesize = 200K | |||
| |counter = 43 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 2 | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 5 | |||
| |algo = old(30d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:Dbachmann/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | |||
| :] | |||
| If you want to discuss an encyclopedic topic, feel free to attract my attention by using article talkpages. I usually do react to e-mails, but as a rule I prefer to keep my interactions regarding Misplaced Pages above-the-board and up for everyone to see. This is also the reason for which I do not think highly of IRC admin discussions, and why I am unsure about the merit of the Misplaced Pages mailing-list. Decisions regarding the administration of Misplaced Pages in my opinion should be made on-wiki, not off. | |||
| == Fake Royalties Of India in Misplaced Pages == | |||
| ---- | |||
| You may look at https://en.wikipedia.org/Kameshwar_Singh and his predecessors who were officialy Zamindars (landlords) and never real Kings, they were never admitted into the Chamber of Princes (cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/Chamber_of_Princes). | |||
| Archives: | |||
| I belong to that region and I do not want to quarrel with that family which was the biggest landlord of India and Kshatra Singh (Thakur) had boughgt the title Maharaja in the beginning of 19th century but this family never had any State or boundary. | |||
| Vinay Jha | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 13:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ]. | |||
| <span style="font-size:60%">]: 21 Jul 2004 (UTC) – 10 Nov 2004 (UTC) / ]: – 25 Nov 04 / ]: – 19 Dec 04 / ]: – 11 Jan 05 / ]: – 8 Mar 05 / ]: – 6 May 05 / ]: – 1 Jul 05 / ]: – 12 Aug 05 / ]: – 7 Nov 05 / ]: </span><span style="font-size:70%"> – 13 Dec 05 / ]: – 16 Jan 06 ]: – 22 Feb 06 / ]: – 21 March 06 / ]: – 19 May 06 / ]: – 5 Jul 06 / – 9 Aug 06 / <: – 9 Sep 06 / : – 2 Oct 06 / : – 23 Oct 06 / : – 30 Nov 06 / </span><span style="font-size:80%"> : – 17:53, 4 Jan 07 / – 05:16, 16 Feb 07 / : – 08:28, 19 Mar 07 / : – 02:43, 11 Apr 07 / | |||
| : – 00:26, 16 May 07 / | |||
| – 19:35, 18 Jul 07 / – 07:47, 21 Aug 07 / | |||
| – 07:34, 5 Oct 07 / | |||
| – 09:10, 21 Nov 07 / | |||
| – 09:19, 26 Feb 08 / | |||
| – 06:35, 3 Jun 08 / | |||
| – 15:15, 18 Nov 08 / 14:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| – 18:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 20:10, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| </span> | |||
| ---- | |||
| == Kuki-Chin-Naga Page Needs a rename == | |||
| ==Archiving?== | |||
| Hi, umm.. your tpage is ''huge''. ] does great at archiving.. would you mind enabling it? → ] ]<small> 17:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
| :heh, it was just 333k. Let's try and reach 444 next time around :) --] <small>]</small> 19:57, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| The Title and the descriptions are inaccurate , this needs fixing in Wiki and the glottocode as well. ] (]) 08:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Speedy deletion nomination of Landgraviate of Burgundy == | |||
| ==Arbitration Req.== | |||
| Hello, Dbachmann, | |||
| You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— | |||
| * ]; | |||
| * ]. | |||
| Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I edit here too, under the username ], and I thank you for your contributions. | |||
| Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> | |||
| {{unsigned|Logos5557}} | |||
| I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged ] for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain ''any'' encyclopedic content. You may find our ] to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in ] first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content. | |||
| == Appearance (Venetic) == | |||
| If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can <span class="plainlinks">''''''</span> but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Landgraviate+of+Burgundy&subtype=delete|deleting administrator}}. | |||
| ::This is from Early Roman Armies (Men-at-Arms) by Nicholas Sekunda and Richard Hook,1995,ISBN-10: 1855325136,Colour plates,The Venetic fighting system,Fifth century BC, the ones of the right. Can someone make a sketch of them?] (]) 13:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Grahaml35<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. And, don't forget to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> . Thanks! | |||
| == early chariots == | |||
| <small>Message delivered via the ] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.</small><!-- Template:Nocontent-warn-NPF --> | |||
| Hello! I was putting together a small presentation on horseback riding and chariots and found , dating the earliest chariots north of the Aral Sea ca. 2000 BC. I'm a bit confused, for the very same article on ]s state that the earliest chariots were found in Sumer, ca. 3000 BC, as I always assumed. Am I getting something wrong?--- Cheers, ] (]) 00:23, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 15:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| this is about spoke-wheeled, horse-drawn chariots. The "chariots" of EBA Sumer were essentially carts, with solid disk-wheels and drawn by asses. --] <small>]</small> 08:07, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| == Persian Empire == | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 7#Landgraviate of Burgundy}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <sub>signed, </sub>] <sup>]</sup> 15:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| I don't think it's got a lot to do with nationalist ideology. The whole problem is ] (remember him from January?) and his problem with me. --] (]) 09:40, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 15#亞}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 22:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| oh man. As if this article didn't have enough problems already. This fellow was bad enough when he tried to argue his core subject of "literature of all types", and I can hardly wait to see what he can do here. As far as I can see he is trying to defend the insalvageable mess left by years of Persian nationalists editing the article to include anything remotely "Persian". Apparently without any indication that he is aware of what he is doing, of course. --] <small>]</small> 09:51, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, what we've been trying to do is to repace it with either a disambiguation page or a short article explaining the concept "Persian Empire" with links to the relevant articles (], ] etc.) - roughly on the model of the ] page. What we don't want is a content fork of most of the ] which gives the impression that the "Persian Empire" was some kind of more or less continuous entity since 8th century BC. Which is basically what the protected version does (with plenty of factual inaccuracies thrown in besides). --] (]) 10:01, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Just as an example of Ottava's understanding of this topic, here are some of his statements:''"The Persian Empire was the series of dynasties following 600 AD."'' Again: ''"The "Persian Empire" refers to a series of dynasties between 600 AD until the Ottoman Conquest. No more, no less."'' And when did the "Ottoman conquest" occur? In 1800 AD apparently: ''"Furthermore, as I stated above, the Persian Empire was the 30 or so dynasties between 600 AD and 1800 AD."'' He's also never heard of '']''. Nevertheless, he still sees fit to pronounce that it is "not a reliable source." --] (]) 10:20, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| well, it seems he is more or less feeding the ] article back to you. This is what happens when you believe what you read on Misplaced Pages :o) | |||
| Except for confusing AD and BC, and making up stuff about the Ottomans, I suppose. I have no idea. But experience has shown that this user cannot be reasoned with, what with his being far too 'educated' to be asked to bother with puny 'facts'. --] <small>]</small> 10:31, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, he's certainly been misled by Misplaced Pages but I'm not sure we can blame it for him making statements like " pre-Persian Empire empires, not the dynasties that made up the Persian Empire. Please get your terms correct." And: "The Persian Empire is not anything pre 600 AD. How can you not understand that?" How indeed. --] (]) 10:50, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| sheesh. I think we didn't count our blessings when we were discussing things like ] with him, topics on which he at least appeared to have some sort of mental grasp. --] <small>]</small> 11:01, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Yep. One final gem: "The pre-Islamic Republics were heavily influenced by the language فارسی , which is not 'Iranian'." I'm still trying to figure that one out. (BTW He berated other users for "not knowing Farsi" before finally admitting he couldn't read it himself.) --] (]) 11:11, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| lol. I am beginning to appreciate OR as comic relief in the "Persian" wikidrama. Bad editors are bad, but only a few master the art of being so bad they are really great (Dr Boubouleix was such a case). --] <small>]</small> 12:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, I remember "vandalising" the Battle of Baghdad page by removing 140K of "quality material" supplied by Geir Smith. OR's ideas about Iranian history aren't even the craziest to have appeared on Misplaced Pages in recent months. You should enjoy the conspiracist contributions of ], an editor who believes Alexander the Great was in fact an Iranian : "The evidence against continues! The lying storytellers who were illiterate and knew nothing about geography created Alexander in order to inflate the importance of an insignificant and indigent people of Greece. The Alexander historians who were a bunch of illiterate liars who didn't know geography created the myth of Alexander with all those mistakes, not knowing that 2000 years later Anush Ravid would reveal the untruth. They defeated and toppled by their Alexander all the countries and peoples who they had heard of in those days, they told much hype and lies which is easily recognizable and whoever that doesn't understand it is a real fool." (I'm just making a wild guess here - maybe User:ShapurIII and Anush Ravid are somehow connected, hmm?) Bonus rant: . --] (]) 13:05, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Dinkytown == | |||
| Although I don't have any strong views one way or the other about the section {{user|Dinkytown}} disputes in EGE. I see that they are acting intemperately and not waiting for responses. I am afraid this is behaviour which, if continued, will probably lead to a block. ] (]) 23:32, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:47, 15 January 2025
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Dbachmann has not edited Misplaced Pages since 1 April 2023. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
|
|
Archives: |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. | |
Fake Royalties Of India in Misplaced Pages
You may look at https://en.wikipedia.org/Kameshwar_Singh and his predecessors who were officialy Zamindars (landlords) and never real Kings, they were never admitted into the Chamber of Princes (cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/Chamber_of_Princes). I belong to that region and I do not want to quarrel with that family which was the biggest landlord of India and Kshatra Singh (Thakur) had boughgt the title Maharaja in the beginning of 19th century but this family never had any State or boundary. Vinay Jha
Nomination for deletion of Template:PIE
Template:PIE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Languages attested from the 12th century BC
A tag has been placed on Category:Languages attested from the 12th century BC indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 20:10, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Kuki-Chin-Naga Page Needs a rename
The Title and the descriptions are inaccurate , this needs fixing in Wiki and the glottocode as well. Daiopch54 (talk) 08:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Landgraviate of Burgundy
Hello, Dbachmann,
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I edit here too, under the username Grahaml35, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Landgraviate of Burgundy for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Grahaml35}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Grahaml35 (talk) 15:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
"Landgraviate of Burgundy" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Landgraviate of Burgundy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 7 § Landgraviate of Burgundy until a consensus is reached. signed, Rosguill 15:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
"亞" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect 亞 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 15 § 亞 until a consensus is reached. Duckmather (talk) 22:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC)