Misplaced Pages

:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:38, 7 September 2009 view sourceTedder (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators62,278 edits →{{la|Sibel Edmonds}}: unprotected← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:26, 24 January 2025 view source Cyberbot I (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors1,724,281 edits Clerking main page and moving requests to appropriate subpages.Tag: Manual revert 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{adminbacklog}}<!-- Do not hide or modify this, a bot named "Cyberbot I" will manage it automatically.--><noinclude><!-- Please put protection templates *inside* the noinclude, because this page is transcluded. -->{{Short description|Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages}}{{/Header}}{{Floating link|class=sysop-show|Administrator instructions|Administrator instructions}}{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}}{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed|{{pp|1=vandalism|action=edit|small=yes|expiry=}}}}<!-- Put interwikis at the Wikidata entry and categories in /Header instead of this page -->
<noinclude>{{/Header}}{{Floatinglink|Administrator instructions|Administrator instructions}}
<!-- do not move the interwikis to the bottom, a bot will remove them --> __FORCETOC__</noinclude><!-- Do not hide or modify this, a bot named "Cyberbot I" will manage it automatically-->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT THIS PAGE. The formatting is enforced by Cyberbot. To make changes, please contact Cyberpower678. -->
<!-- interwikis end here -->]
__TOC__
</noinclude>
==Current requests for protection==
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}


<!-- Please copy the following example code to add a new entry at the bottom of the correct subpage:
===={{la|List of Dragon Ball Z episodes}}====
=== ] ===
'''Temporary semi-protection''' ''vandalism'', Issues with random "new" users reverting the splitting of the list into seasonal pages - done per consensus and to deal with its massive size. -- ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 12:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
* {{pagelinks|Example}} ~~~~
-->


== Current ] in protection level ==
===={{la|St. Philip's Christian College}}====
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button protect}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Increase}}
'''Semi-protect'''. High level of IP vandalism. ] (]) 12:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->


== Current ] in protection level ==
===={{la|2009 ICC Champions Trophy}}====
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button unprotect}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Decrease}}
"semi-protection" "vandalism", Being edited by Pakistan fans by making Pakistan win the trophy. Protection needed for a month.] (]) 08:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->
:{{RFPP|d}} Just 1 IP and a user making the changes. Seems to have stopped now, if it starts again, warn and report at ]. ≈&nbsp;]&nbsp;] ] 08:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


== Current ] to a protected page ==
===={{la|Crunk}}====
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button edit}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Edit}}
"semi-protection" "vandalism", Auto-tune is constantly being added to the page but has nothing to do with the page. Also metal bands Family Force 5 and BrokeNCYDE are added to notable artists but are not what would be called crunk or notable. ]
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->


== Handled requests ==
===={{la|Milhouse Van Houten}}====
''A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at ].''
'''Temporary semi-protection''' ''vandalism'', Lots of anon's coming to the page and saying "Milhouse is not a MEME". ] (]) 07:42, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|nea}} ≈&nbsp;]&nbsp;] ] 08:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

===={{la|The Stig}}====
'''Semi-protection''' Still undergoing the whole "] is The Stig!!" anonymous IP edits in various points of the article. It was figured the fanboys would stop the hype a little after the initial episode aired. Guess not. This is the....I lost count already how many times i've asked for protection.--] (]) 06:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|nea|Compare the date of the last edit to the current date.}} ]<sup>]</sup> 07:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

===={{la|The Circus Starring: Britney Spears}}====
'''Semi-protect'''. High level of IP vandalism within the last 24 hours. --] (]) 01:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

==Current requests for unprotection==
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/URheading}}

===={{la|Shirelive}}====
] and ] I request that shirelive and shirelive church be unlocked. i have modified the page, added relevant and credible sources.The new article is on http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Bunzyfunzy/Shirelivechurch .This is one of the bigger megachurchs according to wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_the_largest_churches_in_Australia] (]) ]
:{{RFPP|ch}} ] (]) 13:28, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

===={{la|Sibel Edmonds}}====
Could someone please check the assertion on the talk page about the reason for not allowing the video taped deposition of Sibel Edmonds to be referred to in the article about her? I can't image how a court deposition (under oath) is not acceptable as a reference for Misplaced Pages. and of 5. What is the issue? The level of protection to the page seems fairly innocuous, but I dont understand the reason for the action, and I want to comply with whatever the rules are. The claim, as I understand it, is that anything posted on BradBlog cannot be used, even a transcript of a deposition.
(] | <small>] • ] </small> 09:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC))
:{{RFPP|u}} Make sure to gain consensus on any (non)reliable sources added to an article, especially a BLP. ] (]) 13:37, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

==Current requests for edits to a protected page==
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/SRheading}}
==Fulfilled/denied requests==
===={{la|Aftonbladet-Israel controversy}}====
'''Semi-protection'''. Persistent vandalism. ] (]) 06:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|b}} ]<sup>]</sup> 06:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

===={{la|Chihuahua (dog)}}====
'''Semi protect''', please. For a week or so. This is getting annoying. ] (]) 06:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|s|one month}} ]<sup>]</sup> 06:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


===={{la|RuneScape}}====
'''Temporary full protection''' ''vandalism'', Multiple instances of vandalism. ] (]) 05:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|b}} for 72 hours. ]]</span> 06:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

===={{la|Franklin}}====
'''Full protection'''. Ongoing disruptive disagreements over the introductory lines. ] ≠ ] 02:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|d}} If necessary, blocks will be handed out. No protection warranted. ]<sup>]</sup> 05:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
::{{RFPP|n}} I think a compromise has been reached both here and at ]. See ]. So no need to protect unless it starts again. ≈&nbsp;]&nbsp;] ] 05:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:::Perhaps ] could be unprotected, in that case? ]<sup>]</sup> 05:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

===={{la|Soviet war in Afghanistan}}====
'''Semi-protection''' - A substantial amount of new users who are making unwarranted changes and/or spamming or adding content that is utterly immaterial to the article. ] (]) 01:16, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{rfpp|semi|1 week}} ] (]) 06:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


===={{la|Lincoln}}====
'''Full protection'''. Ongoing disruptive disagreements over the introductory lines. ] ≠ ] 02:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|ap}} ]<sup>]</sup> 05:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


===={{la|Daryll Clark}}====
'''Temporary full protection''' ''vandalism'', lots of repeated IP vandalism. ] (]) 03:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|b}} ]<sup>]</sup> 03:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

===={{la|This Is War}}====
'''Semi-protect'''. A few editors and several IPs continuously copy and paste copyrighted material from a blog into the article. ] (]) 01:06, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|s|three days}} ]<sup>]</sup> 03:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


===={{lu|DragonZero/Defense Devil}}====
'''Unprotection''', I would like the move protection to be undone now, thanks. . ] (]) 02:36, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|u}} ]<sup>]</sup> 04:06, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


===={{la|John F. Kennedy}}====
'''Indefinite semi-protection''' ''vandalism'', Almost-daily vandalism since protection expired in mid-July. Since ]'s death late last month there's been a spike in unconstructive edits round here. Also, school has begun, and this is a high-profile research topic that should be kept out of reach of trolls. The protection log shows that every time protection expires or a new school year begins, vandalism returns. ] (]) 00:28, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|semi|3 months}} ] 00:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

===={{la|Pitbull (rapper)}}====
'''semi-protection''' ''vandalism'', after protection expired on Sept. 4, vandalism returned daily from a few IP's and an autoconfirmed user. ] (]) 00:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|s|1 week}} ]] 00:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

===={{la|List of Total Drama Island episodes}}====
'''Semi-protect'''. IP's adding rumours that certain characters returning, and unverifiable future episode mentions. ] (]) 23:14, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{rfpp|semi|3 months}} ] (]) 01:02, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

===={{la|National Film Awards}}====
'''Semi-protect'''. A guy keeps edit warring by adding a claim that the awards are the official awards of the country without citing sources as requested. ] • <sup>'']''</sup> 22:30, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{rfpp|d}} Use {{tl|uw-unsourced1}}, {{tl|uw-unsourced2}}, etc instead. ] (]) 01:00, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
::{{RFPP|b}} Actually, this guy was logging out to evade being blocked for edit warring. IP blocked 31 hours, and his apparent sockmaster blocked for 48 hours. ]] 01:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
:::Thanks for catching that. ] (]) 01:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

===={{la|Steven Defour}}====

'''semi-protection''' ''vandalism''. This is an article about a professional football (]) player in the UK. He seems to have changed clubs today and his article has been subject to repeated vandalism from multiple IP addresses. <font face="Kristen ITC"><font color="#FF6600">~~</font> <font color="#006600">]</font> <font color="#009999">(])</font> <font color="#000099"> </font> <font color="#FF6600">~~</font></font> 20:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{rfpp|semi|3 days}} ] (]) 23:18, 1 September 2009 (UTC)


===={{la|Broken-Hearted Girl}}====
The article seems to be permanently protected. ......It has been officially released as a single on August 28, 2009 in Australia.....and it charted on the official ] at number 37..its a notable single....and it has a music video...and it is meets the criteria of having its own article per ].] (]) 21:30, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|u}} It appears that the reason for protection no longer applies. --] (]) 22:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
:Perhaps it's just chart lag, but the latest Aria charts doesn't include it. .&mdash;](]) 22:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
::Resolved:it's on two of the sub-charts, but not the main.&mdash;](]) 00:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:26, 24 January 2025

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.
Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages "WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Skip to requests for protection
    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit
    this header: view • edit


    Archiving icon
    Archives

    2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Shortcuts

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    chhaava

    Reason: This movie is based on historical novel, I want to protect page to prevent incorrect information. Kiranpawar3210 (talk) 06:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

    Question: We don't preemptively protect pages. Is there disruption now? What type and by what users? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

    Vancouver Canucks

    Reason: IPs repeatitly vandalizing the article GoodDay (talk) 04:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Pragyan International University

    Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Recent repeated disruptive editing Cabrils (talk) 04:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Chase Strangio

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent misgendering and vandalism of a trans BLP. Requesting as a WP:GENSEX enforcement action. Funcrunch (talk) 05:06, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 10:45, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    San Jose Sharks

    Reason: IPs vandalizing article GoodDay (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Dragon Age: The Veilguard

    Reason: There was an involved protection request here that failed to mention that several of the users edit warring are extended confirmed. Requesting full protection until the RfC concludes. BMWF (talk) 05:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined Given that all of the extended-confirmed users are in favor of the current version while I wouldn't have done that protection this way if I were the responding admin the effect of increasing it to full would be to deny others the ability to edit while not obviously helping anything. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:53, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Amir Ohana

    Indefinite full move-protection: Contentious topic restriction. Should be full-move protected per Netanyahu and Israel articles. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 05:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Mauricio Funes

    Reason: Persistent vandalism from a block evading IP range and sockpuppets, blocks seem to have no effect PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 06:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Vanda Pignato

    Reason: Persistent vandalism from a block evading IP range and sockpuppets, blocks seem to have no effect PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 06:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Draft:Sandbox

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nixovel (talk) 06:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Liam Coen

    Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 06:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    List of people granted executive clemency by Donald Trump

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FactsheetPete (talk) 07:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Andhras

    Reason: Vandalism and revert-warring Sushidude21! (talk) 08:16, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Talk:Zaire Wade

    Temporary semi-protection. HanTsî (talk) 08:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Misplaced Pages:Teahouse

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nixovel (talk) 08:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Misplaced Pages:Teahouse

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Nixovel (talk) 08:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Iron Age

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs pushing a pseudohistorical fringe POV. - Ratnahastin (talk) 08:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Banda Carnaval

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Yuri Knorozov

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Mellk (talk) 09:25, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    User talk:Dr. Coal

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppets are trolling User:Dr. Coal's talkpage. Kadı Message 10:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    And the Breadwinner Is...

    Reason: Pronoun vandalism and edit warring by illiterate, WP:CIR and probably homophobic IP despite sources. Borgenland (talk) 10:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Shortcuts

    Foundational Black American

    Reason: I am writing to respectfully request the removal of the edit protection on the "Foundational Black Americans" page. I believe that the current state of the page does not accurately represent the term and may inadvertently mislead readers.

    Issue at Hand:

    When searching for "Foundational Black Americans," the page redirects to an individual, which does not provide a definition or proper context of the term. This is concerning because:

    Misrepresentation: "Foundational Black Americans" refers to a lineage of Black Americans whose ancestors were enslaved in the United States and have developed a distinct cultural heritage over generations. It is not a term beholden to any single person or leader.

    Ethnogenesis and Cultural Significance: Black Americans have undergone a unique process of ethnogenesis, evolving from labels such as "Negro" and "Colored" to "African American," and now embracing "Foundational Black Americans" to acknowledge their specific historical and cultural identity.

    Potential Misinformation: Redirecting to an individual's page may contribute to misinformation and does not align with Misplaced Pages's commitment to providing neutral and accurate information.

    Request:

    I kindly request that the edit protection be lifted to allow for collaborative efforts in:

    Creating a Dedicated Page: Developing a comprehensive article that defines "Foundational Black Americans" as a lineage, supported by reliable sources.

    Ensuring Accuracy and Neutrality: Providing readers with accurate information that reflects the collective heritage and contributions of Foundational Black Americans without unintended bias.

    Commitment to Misplaced Pages's Standards:

    I am committed to adhering to Misplaced Pages's guidelines on neutrality, verifiability, and reliable sourcing. My intention is to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia and enhance the quality of information available to the public.

    Conclusion:

    Thank you for considering my request. I believe that updating the page to accurately reflect the term will greatly benefit those seeking information on this important aspect of American history and culture.

    I look forward to your response and the opportunity to contribute to this article. 2601:983:4600:7230:8D69:264C:225A:3C55 (talk) 23:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

    We do not entertain requests made via chatbot. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v 06:36, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
    Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 07:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Gangwar_(surname)

    Reason: I would like to request the unprotection of the Gangwar surname Misplaced Pages page. Currently, the page is semi-protected, which limits editing to more experienced editors, but this has hindered efforts to improve the page. The page lacks crucial information about the Gangwar clan and its historical background, including details from Vedic texts and other historical references.

    As the Gangwar clan's history is deeply rooted in Vedic literature and other historical texts, it requires the expertise of scholars who are familiar with these sources to update the page. Normal editors may not fully grasp the significance of these references, and the semi-protection of the page could delay the process of incorporating the necessary academic and historical context.

    It is important to include information about the Gangwar clan's regional distributions, its connections to other communities, and its role in historical events to improve the page’s accuracy and quality. Additionally, updating the page with proper citations and references from respected sources will greatly enhance the credibility of the article.

    I respectfully request that the page be unprotected so that scholars and experts can contribute to the article and provide a more comprehensive and accurate account of the Gangwar surname and its historical context.

    Thank you for your time and consideration. 4rju9 (talk) 04:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    @4rju9: We do not entertain requests made via chatbot. Discuss it with Daniel Case, who protected it under the auspices of WP:GS/CASTE. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v 06:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
    Daniel Case The page was semi-protected due to edit wars, which are no longer an issue. It needs updating to include historical information about the Gangwar clan, referenced in Vedic texts and historical sources. The page currently lacks information about the Gangwar clan, including historical context, regional distribution, and connections to other communities. Unprotection will allow me and the other scholars to contribute citations and improve the article’s quality and credibility.
    if possible, i would appreciate temporary unprotection or the opportunity to work collaboratively to improve the page.

    4rju9 (talk) 07:33, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined The page was semi-protected due to edit wars - no, it wasn't, it was extended-confirmed protected instead. which are no longer an issue - which means the protection is working. If you have a request for an edit to be made, use {{edit extended-protected}} on the talk page. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:48, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
    the current page has zero historical information about the gangwar clan, and when i tried to add new information with all the source and vedic books. the editors continuously rejected the request even after me providing the sources. the extended-confirmed protected protection is limiting me to update the page. there are no reference nor any information it has basic information about their cast which is kurmi and no vedic information as mentioned in the books. they were part of so many wars and their relation with their ancestors is not mentioned nor the editors are allowing me to update. what is the solution of it. because when i share the historical references from vedic and historical books they are getting rejected.@Pppery @Daniel Case 4rju9 (talk) 08:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
    so many historical and vedic information can be added to the aritcl but the editors are not putting any efforts in updating it or finding about it. nor letting anyone else to update it. 4rju9 (talk) 08:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Artemis II

    Reason: No Protection 2A00:1FA3:50D:CEAD:0:2A:567D:9701 (talk) 09:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

     Comment: Do you have a reason why? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 10:35, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    IOS 18

    Reason: Because it is not necsessary to protect it 2403:6200:89A7:1616:F977:ED1F:EB82:4209 (talk) 10:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

     Comment: Do you have a reason why it's not necessary? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 10:34, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Further information: Misplaced Pages:Edit requests


    Yashasvi Jaiswal

    Change test runs scored from 1766 to 1798 Jaiswalgaurav012002 (talk) 07:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined This page is not protected. You can edit it yourself. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Yashasvi Jaiswal

    Change test Batting average from 55.18 to 52.88 Jaiswalgaurav012002 (talk) 07:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined This page is not protected. You can edit it yourself. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Yashasvi Jaiswal

    Change FC batting average from 64.03 to 62.40 Jaiswalgaurav012002 (talk) 07:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined This page is not protected. You can edit it yourself. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Archive.

    Category:
    Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions Add topic