Misplaced Pages

User talk:Moe Epsilon: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:46, 16 December 2005 editFred Bauder (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,115 edits Sockpuppets of Mcfly85← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:25, 11 January 2025 edit undoZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators30,644 edits SummerSlam (1988) listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{User:SWD316/heading}}


== RAJESH ==


RAJESH ] (]) 10:03, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
<center>
:Is there something I can help you with? — ] ] 11:43, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
----
<font size=4 color=blue>New Comments</font>
----


== New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023 ==
== "Fulgar" edits ==


<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
Well, thanks for bringing it up to my attention, SWD. However, could you mind cross-posting that to the ]? It is in my opinion sufficient information to ask someone to run a ] query, but I don't have that ability (only a few members of the ArbCom have it). If you ask there, someone will get to it. ]]<sup>(])</sup> 01:10, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per ], causes errors for screen readers -->
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF;
|}
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
{| style="float: right;
|- style="font-size: 86%;"
|}
]
'''Backlog'''


'''Redirect drive''': In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with '''23851''' reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to '''0''' (momentarily). Congratulations to {{Noping|Hey man im josh}} who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by {{noping|Meena}} and {{noping|Greyzxq}} with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See ] for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
== User member ==


'''Redirect autopatrol''': All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them ].
Nice template, I'll use it. :D ...but you should rename it to something more descriptive. --] <sub>.</sub> <small>o</small> º<sup> O (])</sup> 03:55, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


'''WMF work on PageTriage''': The ], consisting of {{noping|Samwalton9 (WMF)|label1=Sam|JSherman (WMF)|label2=Jason|SCardenas (WMF)|label3=Susana}}, and also some patches from {{noping|Jon (WMF)|label1=Jon}}, has been hard at work ]. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in ] where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of ], to help find bugs. We will post more details at ] when we are ready for beta testers.
:Agreed. And what's the deal with the artifacts around the puzzle piece? Why wasn't my previous box good enough? *pouts*.... Thanks for adding it, btw. -]]]] 04:03, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


'''Articles for Creation (AFC)''': All new page reviewers are now '''automatically approved''' for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at ] like was required previously). To install the ], visit ], visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit ], and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
:Try {{tl|User AWWD}} --] <sub>.</sub> <small>o</small> º<sup> O (])</sup> 04:05, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


You can review the AFC workflow at ]. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that ], so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.


'''Pro tip''': Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own ]? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is ] 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
Thanks for the new logo. --] 04:22, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


{{refbegin}}
Looks good, thanks. I'll add it to a Userbox page, and probably transclude it somewhere. --]]]] 05:00, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
'''Reminders'''
*Newsletter feedback - please take this ] about the newsletter.
*There is live chat with patrollers on the and {{IRC|wikimedia-npp}} on IRC.
*Please add ] to your watchlist.
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ].
{{refend}}
</div>
<!-- Drafted by Novem Linguae, MPGuy2824 and Zippybonzo. Sent by Zippybonzo. -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Zippybonzo@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1160196052 -->


== New pages patrol needs your help! ==
Thanks, i need more boxes for my wiki-babel box! ] 11:27, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
Ooh, very nice, thank you. Yet another pastel box for my patented Babel-style "Stuff Box" :).
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per ], causes errors for screen readers -->
-- ] 14:47, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
]
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
{| style="float: right;
|- style="font-size: 86%;"
|}
The ] team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting ]. Thank you very much for your help.


{{refbegin}}
== Thanks for the template ==
'''Reminders''':
*There is live chat with patrollers on the .
*Please add ] to your watchlist.
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ].
{{refend}}{{Clear}}
</div>
<!-- Drafted by Illusion Flame. Reviewed by Zippybonzo. Sent by Zippybonzo. -->


Sent by {{noping|Zippybonzo}} using {{noping|MediaWiki message delivery}} at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the user template thing in my user page. I love those little pastel boxes, don't you? Much obliged. --] 13:03, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Zippybonzo@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1162688084 -->


== Apologies ==


Apologies for the last message I left. Just saw that your reversion was also a good faith attempt to remove vandalism. My bad, and sorry for any disruptiveness caused. Cheers, ''atque supra''! ]]] 17:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
==Thanks==
:It's okay, it was my mistake for clicking too quickly. I edit conflicted with you reverting myself. — ] ] 17:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)


== Feeyenism ==
Thanks for the userbox, I'll be sure to put it up soon. Happy edting! (and userbox making)
<br>
<br>
] 18:32, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


Hey Moe,
== Huh? ==


I saw your comment. I understand how everything must be written and published from a neutral point of view. To my knowledge, that is what I was doing. I apologize for the confusion I caused. I will have to find the passage, but the edits I made are in line with published books and letter from Thomas Aquinas and the Vatican, respectively. I will get citations for them and hopefully, only the neutral and honest information of Feeyenism will be published.
On the contary, you removed me! I never removed my name from the list. I presume it was a mistake?
''''']]]''''' 07:55, 4 December 2005 (UTC)


Thank you,
:I assumed that is what had happened. No problemo, it was nice to see the "new messages" bar when I got up this morning! Cheers ''''']]]''''' 15:55, 4 December 2005 (UTC)


Editor9174 ] (]) 18:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
== ] and ] ==
:Hi. Simply changing the article to repeat that it is heresy isn't exactly taking a neutral point of view, even if it is a majority opinion of Catholics. Yes, it is mentioned in the article that according to the Catholics it is considered heresy to them. This shouldn't be the main point of the article. There is a section you could edit specifically about it being condemned and can expand the article as needed with references. Please review ] as well to understand why it can't be the way it was being written. — ] ] 19:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
::I have reverted everything, for I felt it was much simpler to go back to a previously agreed version and then to make or discuss changes.
::I also believe a belief should not be presented mainly as a heresy. ] (]) 21:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
:::Thank you, Veverve. I thought I had found a clean version to revert to, but ended up finding typos and mistakes on that one as well and just did my level best with what was there. — ] ] 21:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
Another user has created a stub for Greco-Roman wrestling and, noticing that Freestyle had a link in the main artical (]) that re-directed back to it, I created a stub for freestyle. I noticed your name on the , and was hoping you could assist me to expand these stubs as I have insufficiant knowlage to do so myself. Thank you in advance, --{{User:Akako/Sig}} 19:29, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)


== New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive ==


{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0"
== ] ==
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">October 2023 Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|]
|-
|
* On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
* Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
* Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects.
* Interested in taking part? ''']'''.
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]
|}


] (]) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
A new[REDACTED] user can't be on wikibreak? ] 03:23, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Zippybonzo@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1174536672 -->


== New pages patrol newsletter ==
*Well, he happens to be a friend of mine, and I do know he'll be back. ] 00:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
**RL friend. And he's absent because of RL stress. ] 19:15, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per ], causes errors for screen readers -->
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF;
|}
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
{| style="float: right;
|- style="font-size: 86%;"
|}
]


'''Backlog update:'''
== Something to add to your userpage ==
At the time of this message, there are ''11,300'' articles and ''15,600'' redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!


'''October backlog elimination drive''':
] I took that black banner to another level. --]]]]
A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can ].


'''PageTriage code upgrades''':
PS: Thanks for the ] greeting! Hope you had a great one as well. --]]]] 10:33, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Upgrades to the ] code, initiated by the ] in 2022 and actioned by the ] in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found ]. As part of this work, the ] now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed - it will replace the current version soon.


'''Notability tip''':
== Re: SWD316 ==
Professors can meet ] #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their ] or ] profile and take a look at their ] and number of citations. As a ''very rough'' rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of ], a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Hi there FireFox, it's SWD316. I hope you didn't take anything personally on the ] earlier today when we were talking about the Stressbusters and everything. Sorry if you did. ] 02:57, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
:No, nothing taken personally. See you around! ]] 13:55, 5 December 2005 (UTC)


'''Reviewing tip''':
== Adminship ==
If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
{{refbegin}}
'''Reminders:'''
*You can access live chat with patrollers on the .
*Consider adding ] to your watchlist.
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ].


{{refend}}
I just wanted to let you know that ] --]]]] 21:30, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Sent by Illusion Flame on behalf of the New Page Patrol team. -->


] (]) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
== Userboxes ==
<!-- Message sent by User:Illusion Flame@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1176571921 -->


== November Articles for creation backlog drive ==
Nice userboxes... No that's not a chat-up line. You might find it helpful by the way to include <nowiki><includeonly></nowiki> tags (like I have on my ]) so that you only appear on user categories once. -- ] ] 01:53, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


<div style="border: 2px solid #484898; background: #FFF; background-color:#98FB98; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
==]==
]
Hello Moe Epsilon:


''']''' is holding a '''month long ]!'''<br />
Check out the ] article and edit it to keep it focused on Jesus and a biographical account of Him. Watch the Jesus page to keep it focused on Him. Thank you. ] 22:23, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
The goal of this drive is to '''reduce''' the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.


You may find ] or ] helpful.
== List_of_drug-free_Wikipedians ==


Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.<br />
I'd like to thank you for your attention to ]. Your logo creation and removal of fakes from the list have been especially helpful. If you could now perhaps help me keep an eye on SqueakBox, who is a member of the Rasafarian cult which teaches that marijuana is, literally, holy, and in fact, in the past, and, in many places, today, has preached racism, and has been adding pro-pot POV statements as captions to the images, on the page. Your help in fighting dope and its pushers is truly heroic. ] 18:19, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
There is a backlog of over {{Rounddown|{{formatnum:{{PAGESINCATEGORY:Pending AfC submissions}}|R}}|-2}} pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! ] (]) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Illusion Flame@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/November_2023_Backlog_Drive/Invite_list&oldid=1182798216 -->


== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
I am not a Rastafarian, that is a Cognition slur (classic cult member behaviour, see ]) but Cognition was tampering with my comments for which he has been reported and which I will certainly take further action on if he persists in this manner. Tampering with the comments of other users on[REDACTED] when those comments are not a personal attack is at all times unacceptable on wikipedia. Please take note, ] 18:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
:From ]'s userpage: "My greatest achievements here so far have been elevating His Imperial Majesty Haile Selassie I of Ethiopia to the status of Almighty God" ... also, see these edits: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AList_of_drug-free_Wikipedians&diff=29914794&oldid=29912572 (describes marijuana as "sacred"), http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3ACognition&diff=22427071&oldid=22421620 (mistakenly believes I have converted to the Rastafarian cult, and congratulates me), http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3ACognition&diff=20727072&oldid=20725877 (describes himself as a "pro-marijuana believer"), http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AList_of_drug-free_Wikipedians&diff=18447863&oldid=18445922 (discusses the promotion of cannabis as per "Rasta philosophy"). For not being a Rastafarian, SqueakBox, your beliefs seem to clearly mirror those of the pro-pot Rasta cult. Perhaps all of your pro-Rasta and pro-drug edits were made in jest and I'm simply not clever enough to recognize your satire? ] 19:31, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I have copied this to ]. Please both respond there where I have also answered Cognition's latest comment, ] 22:13, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
Hi again. See ]. I personally think the category you created was great as it allows people to express their drug-freeness without making POV statements, and that the page should be deleted now we have the category to replace it. Unlike Cognition, who I feel has used the page to promote anti-pot activism, you seem to just want a list of drug free people without turniung things into a political debate so I hope you will vote to delete the page but it would be good to see your vote either way, ] 16:56, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


== Wikipedians accused of being possessed??? ==

I dread to ask... -- ] ] 03:16, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

It made me realise how nosey I was being but your message did make me chuckle... I have never been accused of being possessed but then I don't tend to hang out with religious types and didn't grow up in a religious family. I have heard of it among friends though so won't pry. -- ] ] 03:36, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Now that made me laugh. Also following one of the links from your page led me to discover which made me laugh even more. Shall I break it to them that I'm British??? -- ] ] 04:03, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Ah, you see I went to university at a time when the British government paid for students to go - a system that you don't have in the States (and we don't have any more over here either). *Sigh* those were the days, when education was free and all... And I am a quarter American so my grandfather's genes must have rubbed off somewhere along the line... -- ] ] 04:13, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

TTFN -- ] ] 04:20, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

== Well ==

First off, you have got to be about the biggest crybaby on wikipedia. I mentally threw up when I came across your page. You get your page vandalized twice, which is a fairly low amount, and you just cry about it on your front page. Why don't you be a man and have a little confidence. All you are is a giant crybaby who is insecure and needs a smack.

And you think you deserve to be an admin? Like half of your edits are on your stupid talk page. The way you talk about members that you accuse of being "poor editors" is just faulty and sad. Shame on you, you deserve a lifetime ban from[REDACTED] with the actions you have caused. Shame, shame on you.

::{{unsigned|Sven66}}


== Excuse Me ==

I don't know who you are, but I have been told that you have slandered my name across various administrative boards. I'm sorry that your page was vandalized, but I did not do such a thing. Please leave me alone, I don't know who you are, I didn't do any vandalizing. Please stop making rash statements about me and making quick assumptions.

I noticed in one of your board posts, that you say I make poor edits. That is an incredibly stupid thing to say. Most of my edits are typos/style, but they are still important, nonetheless. ] 09:27, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

== My RfA ==
]
<div align="center">
{| style="border: 4px groove #cc0000; background-color:#ffff99; padding:5px; width: 600px"
!<div style='font-family: "Bitstream Vera Sans", "Verdana", "Helvectica" sans-serif; font-size: 14px; border: 1px inset #cc0000; color: #000000; padding: 3px; background-color: #f0f000' color:#000000;>My ] was successful!</div>
|- style="height: 75px"
|<div style='font-family: "Bitstream Vera Serif", "Georgia", serif; color:"#000080"; font-size: 13px;'> '''Thank you so much for your support of my RfA.''' The results of the request was 18/0/1. With the help of your support vote, '''I am now a bona-fide Misplaced Pages sysop/admin'''. I pledge to use my newfound powers for the good of Misplaced Pages and its editors. If you have anything to tell me, dont hesitate to "speak on it"!. --]]]]
</div> </div>
|}
</div> </div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 -->


== New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive ==
== Nom ==


{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0"
Hi there, do you remember? I noticed that there is some conflict going on and was wondering if you would like to put it off a few days. Your userpage has been vandalized 3 times today, if you dont mind my asking, wtf is going on? Still, I dont mind doing it tomorrow at all. P.S. I have been informed that there will be a power cut tomorrow from 07:00 to 14:00 UTC. I planned on doing it at 19:00 UTC, but just in case the cut goes over time, I dont want you to be alarmed. Cheers ''''']]]''''' 15:33, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|]
|-
|
* On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
* Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
* Each review will earn 1 point.
* Interested in taking part? ''']'''.
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]
|}
] (]) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1190722499 -->
==Orphaned non-free image File:Scott Grimes - Drive.png==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
:Ok, is it fine if I nominate you at 19:00 UTC tomorrow? ''''']]]''''' 19:25, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


== New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024 ==
::Ah, the vandals, it does seem peculiar though. My userpage has only been vandalized once by someone I didnt know in the real world. The other 2 vandalisms were by people I knew personally who did it as a prank. Oh well. Sadly, I am expecting "]" for my birthday and I have to put up with a power cut, how annoying. Still, I look forward to making you my third successful admin nomination. Cheers ''''']]]''''' 19:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
P.S. Any suggestions on what to write in the nominator comments section:-)?
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per ], causes errors for screen readers -->
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF;
|}
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
{| style="float: right;
|- style="font-size: 86%;"
|}
]


'''Backlog update:''' The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to {{no ping|Schminnte}}, who led with over 2,300 points.
It is done, good luck. ] - ''''']]]''''' 18:42, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Sorry to bother you, but a word of friendly advice: Rather dont place comments below oppose votes, I know Rock09's number of edits is suspect, but preferably let others work that out themselves. I am not chastising you, it isnt really any of my business, but when a candidate rebutts statements some other editors frown upon it. Rather stay away from it and let me, and others, do that. Thanks for bearing with me, I hope I havnt sounded too rude... ''''']]]''''' 20:45, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the ].
:Glad to hear it. For the record, I am not "against" Mcfly85 per se. Heck, I dont even know him. But as I said on the RFA, the diffs you fixed do make one wonder. Anyways its been a long day for me, and its getting on for midnight, so, I'm off for now. Good luck ''''']]]''''' 21:13, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
== Esperanza Election ==


'''2023 Awards'''
SWD, as you are probably aware, the Esperanza elections are coming up. After running for the advisory committee last time, with some degree of success, I have decided to run for the same post again. I noticed that you (graciously) voted for me last time. I hope I can count on your vote again! Working together, we can make Misplaced Pages a better, more inclusive place. Yours in Esperanza, ].
]
{{no ping|Onel5969}} won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. {{no ping|Hey man im josh}} led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the ] and the ]. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!


'''WMF work on PageTriage:''' The ] and volunteer software developers ], and then ]. This concludes most major work to ], and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who ]. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
== Your RfA ==


'''Recruitment:''' A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Sure thing! I thought you were one already, though. --] 00:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


'''Reviewing tip:''' Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated tool.
== Your withdrawn RFA ==


{{refbegin}}
I am sorry that you felt the need to withdraw your RFA and quit Misplaced Pages over the actions of one vindictive editor and some probable sock puppets. I think once the facts came out, your nomination would have fared much better. I hope you change your mind and don't let this one user drive you away. -- ] 05:13, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
'''Reminders:'''
:Agreed. You're a good bloke, and it's this is truly sad. Reconsider, won't you? Some advice- '']'' is a classic, watching it always cheers me up. Some ] DVD's are good for some laughs too. Give it a try.--]|]<font color="green">]</font> 05:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
* You can access live chat with patrollers on the .
:: Grr... don't let a sock-fest drive you away. Everyone loses, except them. Take a break and then think for a bit, all right? But come back! ]]<sup>(] - ])</sup> 05:35, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
* Consider adding ] to your watchlist.
* To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ].


{{refend}}
I am truly sorry to discover that your rfa has backfired to make a good editor pack up and leave. Please reconsider. Cheers ''''']]]''''' 06:06, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
</div>
] (]) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1216676254 -->


== New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive ==
I too am sorry that you let the needles of Mcfly85 and his sockpuppets get to you, but your hastily withdrawn RfA and "I Quit" message only confirm my opposition. An administrator should be able to handle people like that with aplomb. For the record, I was in no way influenced by what he and his puppets had to say; I have a great deal of experience in AfD where we deal with puppets (of both the sock and meat varieties) constantly, so it was obvious to me what was happening. My opposition was based solely on your contribution record and I tried to give you constructive advice. I'll repeat: show me that you understand and are able to implement Misplaced Pages policies while keeping your cool when dealing with idiots, and I'll gladly support you. Additionally, please consider the wisdom imparted at ]: '''''Administrator status is not a trophy.''' Editors who regard being an administrator as an affirmation of their contributions as an editor or an award for good editing or other good service will generally be disappointed. Administrator status does not place you in an elevated status within Misplaced Pages. Every good-faith editor, from the newest editor to the most experienced bureaucrat, has the same status within Misplaced Pages. You will not gain respect simply by being an administrator.'' Hope to see another RfA for you when you can demonstrate that you will wield the administratorship honorably and I will most definitely support you at that time. Regards, ] <small>] &#149; ] &#149; &#149; ] ]</small> 07:34, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0"
Well, I can speak for everybody here, as I'm sorry to see you go in such a way. As you helped me in my Wikistress situations, I wish I could help you in a similar way. I'm shocked to see you leave off of a foolish sockpuppet. Given the time, things would have been taken care of, and your RfA could have been successful. Throught my year here at Misplaced Pages I was faced with similar problems, and sometimes I felt like exploding. If nothing else, this was a test to see if one ''really'' has what it takes to become a Misplaced Pages admin. The thing about having more abilities, is having more responsibilities. In my three days of being a rollback enabled RC patroller, I've had my userpage already vandalized, as well as seeing my fellow RC patrollers have their user (talk) pages replaced with penis pictures. It only gets more difficult. But remember, it took me over a year to get my adminship. And even so, I didn't get full support.
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|]
|-
|
* On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
* Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
* Each review will earn 1 point.
* Interested in taking part? ''']'''.
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]
|} ] (]) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1219352352 -->
==Happy First Edit Day!==
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
{{ombox
| name = First Edit Day
| image = ]
| imageright = ]
| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: repeating-linear-gradient(300deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite, MistyRose 50%);
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
| plainlinks = yes
| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Moe Epsilon! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 00:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
}}


== New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive ==
I see you have the potential to be a good admin. I hope you could take this more as a wikibreak, than an actual resignation. --]]]] 09:45, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; color: #000; padding:10px 15px 0"
I am always disturbed when good editors get chased off the project by the Rfa process (which is itself inherently at fault). I have seen to many good editors go this way. Hope you come back, don't let the bxxxxxds grind you down, ] 15:16, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">]</span>
|rowspan=3|]
|-
|
* On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
* Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
* Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
* Interested in taking part? ''']'''.
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]
|}
] (]) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1242377836 -->


==Happy Birthday!==
</center>
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
== Hey ==
{{ombox
|type = notice
|image = ]
|style = background:Darkgreen;border: 1px solid #CC9999;
|text = <span style="font-family:Book Antiqua;color:#FFFF00;">Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the ].</span>--] (]) 02:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
}}
:Thanks, I appreciate it. — ] ] 02:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
::TOKI ] (]) 22:17, 24 October 2024 (UTC)


== Coincidence? ==
I am not a sockpuppet for mcfly85. How dare you make such a rash accusation. If I were you, I'd take down all that slanderous material that you have posted about that user. Calling him names like an "asshole" is just sad and makes you look worse. And you said you were a Christian. Remove those nasty materials you have said about mcfly85, it would work out to both of your favors. ] 09:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
: I apologise for what I'm about to say but SWD316 is a '''much''' more valued contributor than that of a possible sockpuppet with only 12 edits. --]<font color="green">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 15:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


Hey,
::12 edits...some of which are vandalism. I hope to see you back soon SWD316. Just cool off and relax for awhile.... ''''']]]''''' 18:38, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
I noticed you edited my dads wiki many years ago. There was some strange reference to a ninja, not sure if you removed that or tried to put it in. And you username seems to allude to the name of the chapter of my fraternity Mu Epsilon. Wondering if I know you? ] (]) 02:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
:Hello. I looked back at the edit you mentioned and someone made a change to the article blanking it out and writing something about a ninja on it. I changed it back to the way it was before that, because obviously it was ]. My username is in reference to something else, I was never in a fraternity. It's safe to say I probably do not know you, however. Have a nice day. — ] ] 12:31, 2 November 2024 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
:::I never once said that I was a more valued contributor, but I do feel that SWD316 is vastly overrated. I feel that his comments on his user page are personal attacks toward me and mcfly85 and other valid users and they should be removed. It makes him look bad to call people "assholes" and it also makes him look like a basket case. Yes, I have not been around long, and I have experiemented a bit, but there is no reason to have those personal attacks on his user page, no reason at all, that's the main point here. ] 19:06, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
:::: Yes, but '''you''' made him leave. There's no excuse and stop wasting our time. --]<font color="green">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 19:23, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
:::::I am not wasting your time, you are wasting it yourself. I want you all to take a look at this link ]. There are obvious violations of what is official policy on the user page. And I did not make him leave, he obviously must have a low mental capacity and left himself. He just cannot handle that someone just doesn't feel he should be an admin. ] 19:29, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
::::::Although, arguably, "he obviously must have a low mental capacity" falls under NPA. ''''']]]''''' 19:34, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


</div>
:::::::Alright, I flubbed a bit. I should have said "in my opinion". However, let's get back at the issue at hand, SWD316 made personal attacks toward users in his user page. That is a violation and I think those references should be removed. He can tell about his struggles and troubles and be angry, but to put down a specific user is totally unacceptable. ] 19:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->


== New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive ==
:::::::: The issue at hand is that you, at the very least a new, vandalous user, has boycotted his RfA, despite not being eligible to vote at all. As a result, a valued contributor has left. Then you come here adding salt to the wounds and argueing about ]. You have no right to do such a thing and we are standing up for a Wikipedian in good standing. Did you see the support voters? All of which I have at least heard of and a great number of which are Administrators. I think they have better knowledge of the Misplaced Pages system, policies, guidelines and community than you. I really shouldn't be getting so annoyed but when the system allows people like you to tread all over valued contributors, I do get angry. Look, I said that without resorting to personal attacks, unlike youself, "He obviously must have a low mental capacity" indeed... --]<font color="green">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 21:46, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
== Stop ==
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | ] | <span style="font-size: 85%">''']''' </span>

| rowspan=3 | ]
Please remove the comments about me on your user page. They are in direct violation of the code of conduct rules. I am sorry that other users have "harrassed" you, but I have done nothing of the sort. I will let bygones be bygones if you remove all infomation/accusations about me on your user page. Take advantage of this chance. ] 23:50, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
|-
::What, you already notified the Admin's board. I dont think they will be able to do much. Please leave me alone and I'll leave you alone. ] 23:53, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
|
:::No, I want all references about me removed immediately. It is in violation of the ] policy. You have used two examples listed to slander me, and that is, "Profanity directed against another contributor" and "Accusatory comments such as "Bob is a troll", or "Jane is a bad editor" can be considered personal attacks if said repeatedly, in bad faith, or with sufficient venom.". I do not have a clue as to who these sock puppets are, and I do not use sock puppets, and I do not vandalize articles. I would assume that some anon just looked through your edits and just went with it. I'm sorry that your pages have been vandalized, but all references to me must be removed, or I will pursue further action. ] 11:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
* On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.

* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
== Idiots in the RfA ==
* Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.

* ] will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
You wrote:
* Barnstars will also be granted for ] previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
:''If you knew there was, what you call, idiots on my RFA disrupting the process, why didnt you do anything about it? I could only handle Mcfly85 for so long. You can remain cool only for so long before it gets annoying. I know that being an admin doesn't place you at a better position, I just wanted an fair opportunity at being an admin without conflict from outside users like Mcfly85, Rock09 and Sigma995 that influence voters.''
* Interested in taking part? ''']'''.
I didn't feel like anything needed to be done that hadn't already been done. The two diffs that showed your edit to Mcfly85's user page and the subsequent vandalism to your user page were enough to discount his vote (although like Banes said, there's no direct evidence that it was him). Lord Vid had already remarked how Rock09 had less than 10 edits at the time of his vote and someone else had shown that Sigma995 had only 4 edits at the time of his vote, so what else should I have done? The information was already there for everyone else to see. I don't want to sound pedantic or cliché, but there's that old saying from '']'', (something like) "If your enemy is destroying himself, there is no need to attack." All you needed to do was let them say what they wanted to say and any intelligent/experienced Wikipedian would have been able to figure it out. Instead, you got yourself all worked up and withdrew your RfA when you didn't have to. Treat this as a lesson to be learned and you'll do all right next time. Regards, ] <small>] &#149; ] &#149; &#149; ] ]</small> 07:52, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
|-

|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]
== Hope you're back soon ==
|}

] (]) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Sigh... another great user driven off by trolls and their socks. And I didn't even get chance to vote on your RfA. Hope you come back soon, and I'm sure your next RFA will go great... just make sure to drop me a note so I can be first to vote and fight some trolls! ] ] 15:56, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1263150419 -->


== Enough is Enough ==

OK, I'll make you a deal. You remove all references to me on your user page, and I will never "bother" you again. You have no right to insult me or make unfounded claims on your user page about me. It is slander and I will not have my name be cheapened by your rash actions. I did not ever create a sockpuppet, I never vandalized your page. I just said you would not make a good admin, and I developed a valid case for that. So just take the stuff down, that's all I'm asking, and I think it is very little of me to ask. It would make things easier for the both of us if all references and allegations (which are totally false) to my user name be removed. You are violating many codes of conduct on[REDACTED] and making yourself look like a jerk in the process. ] 16:37, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
:Tell me where there one personal attack on my user page about you? ] 16:55, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
::Look, just take my name off your page. I just don't feel it needs to be on there, and I do not deserve this kind of treatment. I have not done anything to you. Just remove my user name off the page, and I'll never bother you again. ] 17:26, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
::: So long as he's not violating ] then he can say whatever he likes on his userpage. --]<font color="green">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 17:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
:::: He is making a false accusation of me on the page, which would qualify as a personal attack. He is also making a personal attack on the user above. I don't understand this, I am not a bad editor, I just want my user name off of his page, that's all. And I'll never bother you again. ] 17:31, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

== "Against policy" ==

Nothing currently on your userpage violates any WP policy so no, there's not need to change it. Hope you're feeling a bit better :). Did you notice the Esperanza elections are going through - you're not doing too badly! --]<font color="green">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 17:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
: Yeah it would seem so lol and I'm glad you're feeling better. You should definately vote... <small>...for me!!!</small> --]<font color="green">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 17:30, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
:: Yay! Go me! --]<font color="green">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 17:40, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
It's not against WP policy, but if taking it out makes him leave you alone, do so. But it's good to hear you're feeling better. ]]<sup>(] - ])</sup> 18:45, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

== Hmm... ==

You may want to look at the history of ]. And, less interestingly, the history of ]. I just thought this might interest you. Cheers ''''']]]''''' 17:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

:The fact that the Frank Beard article is so, small, and relatively un-edited, it is interesting. Personally, I am not that keen on going after socks, but, cant you get a checkuser? Anyway, I thought it might interest you in future matters.... ''''']]]''''' 17:54, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

::I would suggest you bounce it at Celestian and see what he makes of it. ''''']]]''''' 18:00, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

::: Looks a bit suspect to me. I definately advise getting a Checkuser. shows all of the people with this power. --]<font color="green">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 18:05, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

:::: Yes, you should/could :) ^^ --]<font color="green">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 18:16, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
===Sockpuppets of Mcfly85===
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 01:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Checkuser show that one of the ip addresses used by McFly85 was used to create {{Vandal|Petergrif}} {{Vandal|Rock09}} {{Barkman34}} {{Vandal|Belligto}} {{Vandal|Manyana555}} {{Vandal|Sven66}} {{Vandal|Salian45}} {{Vandal|Capnoh}} {{Vandal|Jimcrocela}} {{Vandal|Loolooloo}} {{Vandal|Oneandon}} {{Vandal|Sigma995}} {{Vandal|Tobiasafi}} and {{Vandal|4benson3}}. Mcfly85 also used 13 other ips, many in the 63.18 range. ] 19:46, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:25, 11 January 2025

This is Moe Epsilon's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37

RAJESH

RAJESH 2409:40D5:103C:4E14:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 10:03, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Is there something I can help you with? — Moe Epsilon 11:43, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

Hello Moe Epsilon,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

New pages patrol needs your help!

New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello Moe Epsilon,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Apologies

Apologies for the last message I left. Just saw that your reversion was also a good faith attempt to remove vandalism. My bad, and sorry for any disruptiveness caused. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 17:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

It's okay, it was my mistake for clicking too quickly. I edit conflicted with you reverting myself. — Moe Epsilon 17:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Feeyenism

Hey Moe,

I saw your comment. I understand how everything must be written and published from a neutral point of view. To my knowledge, that is what I was doing. I apologize for the confusion I caused. I will have to find the passage, but the edits I made are in line with published books and letter from Thomas Aquinas and the Vatican, respectively. I will get citations for them and hopefully, only the neutral and honest information of Feeyenism will be published.

Thank you,

Editor9174 Editor9174 (talk) 18:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Simply changing the article to repeat that it is heresy isn't exactly taking a neutral point of view, even if it is a majority opinion of Catholics. Yes, it is mentioned in the article that according to the Catholics it is considered heresy to them. This shouldn't be the main point of the article. There is a section you could edit specifically about it being condemned and can expand the article as needed with references. Please review WP:WEIGHT as well to understand why it can't be the way it was being written. — Moe Epsilon 19:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
I have reverted everything, for I felt it was much simpler to go back to a previously agreed version and then to make or discuss changes.
I also believe a belief should not be presented mainly as a heresy. Veverve (talk) 21:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Thank you, Veverve. I thought I had found a clean version to revert to, but ended up finding typos and mistakes on that one as well and just did my level best with what was there. — Moe Epsilon 21:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Tony Parisi (wrestler)

Tony Parisi (wrestler) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter

Hello Moe Epsilon,

New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Moe Epsilon:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1800 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Scott Grimes - Drive.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scott Grimes - Drive.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Moe Epsilon,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Calendar emojiHappy First Edit Day!
Hi Moe Epsilon! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 00:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Party popper emoji

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee.--DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, I appreciate it. — Moe Epsilon 02:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
TOKI 2400:C600:3576:2942:1:0:CD02:DFD9 (talk) 22:17, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Coincidence?

Hey, I noticed you edited my dads wiki many years ago. There was some strange reference to a ninja, not sure if you removed that or tried to put it in. And you username seems to allude to the name of the chapter of my fraternity Mu Epsilon. Wondering if I know you? 97.120.169.27 (talk) 02:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I looked back at the edit you mentioned and someone made a change to the article blanking it out and writing something about a ninja on it. I changed it back to the way it was before that, because obviously it was vandalism. My username is in reference to something else, I was never in a fraternity. It's safe to say I probably do not know you, however. Have a nice day. — Moe Epsilon 12:31, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for SummerSlam (1988)

SummerSlam (1988) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

User talk:Moe Epsilon: Difference between revisions Add topic