| Revision as of 01:40, 29 December 2005 editSCZenz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,321 edits →[]: thanks← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:31, 15 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,672,245 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (3x)Tag: Fixed lint errors | ||
| (407 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ]: May 2005 - August 2005<br> | |||
| ]: May 2005 - October 2005<br> | |||
| ]: October 2005 (much busier as an admin, I guess)<br> | |||
| ]: October 2005 - November 2005<br> | |||
| ]: Nov 28th, 2005 - December 19th, 2005 <br> | |||
| ] | |||
| =Status= | |||
| {{User:Evilphoenix/status}} | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| == are polls evil? == | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| True. But this particular poll is not particularly helpful, for a variety of reasons. ]]] 02:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. <span style="color: #D00000;">'''RJaguar3 | ] | ]'''</span> 22:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Hello--I am already messing around with the Userboxes and other fun things--Misplaced Pages as MySpace!:P | |||
| ==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| Clemson University T-shirts are really cool. My dad was traveling over there and got me one, I get lots of good feedback when I wear it. | |||
| ] Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 19:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Deletion review for ] == | |||
| == Greetings! == | |||
| An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Relevant discussions ], ], ], ]. The article's third edit proposed it for speedy deletion , which you declined in the 5th edit . I do not know if you would consider yourself involved or neutral, but for a 160 (or 25) year old university fraternity with a place in equality history, although sources online are all tied to the organization, I am informing you of the discussion. ] (]) 06:24, 2 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Hello--I am already messing around with the Userboxes and other fun things--Misplaced Pages as MySpace!:P | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> —]<span style="color:red">❤]☮]☺]☯</span> 19:34, 27 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Speedy == | |||
| Clemson University T-shirts are really cool. My dad was traveling over there and got me one, I get lots of good feedback when I wear it. | |||
| --] 07:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Well alright then, hope you enjoy yourself. If you ever have any questions let me know. ] <sup><small><b>]</b></small></sup> 07:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| You apparently were not notified about this speedy - https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User%3AEvilphoenix%2Fpotw&diff=567456927&oldid=45578088 ''']'''<sup>]</sup> 22:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| Hi, you're down as being an an active cabalist. Is that still true? There are plenty of cases awaiting mediator response, please drop by if you can! ] (]) 10:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :Man that took me a second to translate....but yeah. I'm willing to participate, but I have a policy against seeking out controversial issues to mediate on, I have enough of them come my way as is. That being said, I added myself there to let people know I was willing to help, and I still am, but basically I have to be ''asked''...not trying to be snobby, I just try to only get involved where I'm ''asked'' to intercede, if that makes sense. ] <sup><small><b>]</b></small></sup> 19:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 00:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| ==Kumanovo== | |||
| ] | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 00:30, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| I encourage you to thoroughly read the comments on the discussion for my RFC. Actually, dont even read the comments, just read the section headers. Then you will understand that this is ''not a content dispute''. I have tried to get this point across, but people just dont listen. ] 11:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I ''have'' been reviewing the discussion, and I have already posted my comment. Your actions as an Administrator were out of line. You do not understand the requirements and responsibilities of Adminship, and looking at your actual RfA, I disagree with the closing of it and don't think you should have ever been promoted. You need to learn how to appropriately serve in your role as an Administrator and an editor. ] <sup><small><b>]</b></small></sup> 19:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --><strong style="font-variant:small-caps">] ]</strong> 13:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Gov_Bredsen.jpg == | |||
| == Substitution at Template:Please sign == | |||
| Was there a specific reason this image was deleted, other than the fact that Scott Fisher uploaded it? I know Scott Fisher is a notorious vanity hound, but that particular image was worked out as a compromise after I carefully explained all the Misplaced Pages guidelines to him. Has he reverted back to his old habits? ] 15:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I deleted all of his uploaded images, basically because he lied about the provenance of so many images, I felt that we could not be certain that any of his images were not in fact copyrighted, and therefore we could not afford to keep them on the Encyclopedia. It didn't really have anything to do with his vanity, just the legality of the images. Unfortunately, some images that were probably ok went with that, but I did run through quite a number that were obviously still going to be copyright violations. I'm sorry if that ended up throwing out the baby with the bathwater, but if you yourself have a copy of the image I'd welcome you to re-upload it. ] <sup><small><b>]</b></small></sup> 19:20, 20 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I'm not sure if you care or not, but, being the creator of the template, I thought I should inform you. | |||
| == What happened in Boston? == | |||
| I requested that it ''not'' be substituted, because of the markup that would create. My rationale is that if we need to remind people to sign their posts (very beginner-level material) anyone who would be at a given talk page would see a bunch of HTML after the template is substituted. I find it a "cleaner" solution to have people use the template without substituting it. | |||
| did. <font color="darkred">]</font> <sub>(<font color="teal">]</font>+<font color="darkblue">]</font>+])</sub> 05:21, 21 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Interesting, I was rooting around trying to find a reference to what he was referring to. They circled for several hours to burn off fuel, why not just go where they were going to burn off fuel instead? *shrugs*. ] <sup><small><b>]</b></small></sup> 05:23, 21 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| So (directly contrary to what you said) placed {{tlx|Substitution|not}} on the page. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| P.S. The fact that they took away your mop is totally whack. ] (]) 06:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Hi - I just wanted to drop by and thank you for supporting my RfA. I'll do my best as an admin to help the dream of Misplaced Pages become the reality. Cheers! ] ] 22:42, 21 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| :Bout damn time too. :-P ] <sup><small><b>]</b></small></sup> 22:44, 21 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 10:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Notification of automated file description generation == | |||
| ==Thanks for being level-headed== | |||
| Your upload of ] or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page. | |||
| I'll post my last comments now. Key words are "fought as a unit in battle." As a military man, I can assure you that the citadel folks are trying to say that they had cadets fight in battles, and that is fine. That the citadel had cadets fight in battles is not being disputed. "Fighting as a unit" is different altogether. Dozens of schools had students fight in various battles in the Civil War, that was the nature of the war. Only one school fought as a unit in combat, ever...and that's VMI. Sorry for being heated (I'm a South Carolinian myself) but I continually see citadel folks latch onto VMI in virtually every regard, and they are definitely stretching the truth here. It's just plain "cheezy!" | |||
| ] 00:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions ]. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 15:04, 18 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Template:Harry Potter category == | |||
| When you updated the list of you gave 2006 as the year in which that ban would terminate. Linuxbeak a duration of one week, so I think that you might like to change that '6' to a '5'. ] 01:06, 22 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 22:04, 30 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :whoopsie. ] <sup><small><b>]</b></small></sup> 01:07, 22 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for letting me know. ] 04:03, 22 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please direct all further discussion of Pigsonthewing to ]. Thank you. | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == My RFA == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691991546 --> | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Template:Please sign == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 16:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Just to let you know == | |||
| Well, looks like my RFA will pass very soon. I just wanted to thank you for your nomination, and for your last minute nominator support. ;-) I will try and use my admin powers for ] rather than ]. Anyways, I just wanted to bring this particular thread off the RFA in my response: | |||
| You have been mentioned at ]. ] (]) 21:56, 7 October 2016 (UTC){{small|please ] me}} | |||
| #'''Strong Support'''. I though ''I'' introduced Evil and Death though... Reasonably sure... ]]] (]) ] 06:53, 19 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #: I wasn't sure what you were saying for a while until I noticed your edit summary. You are of course referring to ], but I had met Deathphoenix prior to that on the HP WikiProject. ] <sup><small><b>]</b></small></sup> 04:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #::You may not know this, but the first time I encountered your username was in ]. --]]]] 16:12, 21 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #:::I didn't, and that's awesome. I hadn't ever noticed that comment either, I don't think I'd gone back to the discussion after voting on it. That was only my second week on the Wiki! I didn't realize we went ''that'' far back. All five Phoenixes? Where are the other Three? What are they? GoodPhoenix? LawfulPhoenix? ChaoticPhoenix? :-P ] <sup><small><b>]</b></small></sup> 22:43, 21 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #::::There's ], and even the original ], who only made four edits in August 2001 and one in January 2003. We'll need to find one more form the head & torso. Is there a ]? --]]]] 23:00, 23 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #::::: There '''is''' another Phoenix... ] 06:06, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| #::::::Yeah, I live ]! ]·] 07:21, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hello== | |||
| Greetings right back. Thanks for message. Misplaced Pages's great. | |||
| ] 05:57, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Merry Christmas!!== | |||
| ] 22:22, 24 December 2005 (UTC)]] | |||
| == heeeeeeeeeeelp!!!!!! == | |||
| This is my first time reportning, i ashamed to do this {{vandal|Dyslexic agnostic|Dyslexic_agnostic|]]}} for atarters, ths stalking harassment-lover has emptied the Bat-embargo page, insulted me and my editions directly, i've tried to make peace repeatedly, explaining him that i feel ofended, vandalized my own page writting sturr i repeatedly told him not to, i got out of control and swear indirecty at him in that very space. lately he reverted my editions writting insulting summaries in the Batman, batman villains and superman articles. Please, at least make him stop or met me in the middle point or something. He is also confused about article sizes. i've not been that smart daling with him but i think i deserve beter--] 09:02, 26 December 2005 (UTC)woow i saw what he has been doing with everythink i write...scary | |||
| ::Do not warry, help is on way.evilphoenix wil help ya. he is nice persin and good administrator. he will block bad people and is known fir good work encluding lightning, tman. happy new year. ] 20:02, 26 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi there. I just got an email recently from Scott Fisher, who I had some contact with back when he was editing physics articles. I offered to inquire into his banning; I looked into what's been posted about him, and it seems to me like he might be a productive user if he could just stay away from uploading/adding images completely. (He clearly can't or won't avoid copyvios properly, but maybe avoiding images completely would be a simple rule that he could follow if it was made very clear that it was absolute.) Do you think it's worth giving him another shot, or has he already been given enough chances to clean up his act? Thanks, ] 06:23, 27 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm not really active right now for the next day or so, if you don't mind waiting a bit for me to get back to you. Thanks. ] <sup><small><b>]</b></small></sup> 18:03, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Cool, no hurry. -- ] 18:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| So, to respond to your comment, personally I'm not in favor of Scottfisher editing on Misplaced Pages. He has uploaded images claiming {{tl|pd-self}} on images that were clearly ''not'' taken by him. He ended up indefinitely blocked by ] for it, but I unblocked him in order to give him a chance to reform. He managed to cooperate somewhat, but I also warned him to not upload or add images to articles under any circumstances, and he continued to do both despite being warned, and so I blocked him indefinitely for it. Being as no other Administrator has chosen to unblock him, that essentially amounts to a ban, ''unless'' an Administrator chooses to unblock him. However, he has lied about the provenance of uploaded photos, which is according to Jimbo a bannable offense, and he also created a sockpuppet in an attempt to circumvent his ban, and edited several images that he had uploaded as Scottfisher to attribute them to his new name. This does not encourage me that we would obey a restriction on image uploading. I would suggest you also speak with Fvw, and get his input. ] <sup><small><b>]</b></small></sup> 01:34, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| : Thanks for your reply. It sounds like the extra chance I was thinking of giving him may already have been given. I might check in with Fvw also. -- ] 01:40, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:31, 15 March 2023
Nomination of List of Legends of the Hidden Temple episodes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Legends of the Hidden Temple episodes is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Legends of the Hidden Temple episodes (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RJaguar3 | u | t 22:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 19:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Deletion review for Zeta Delta Xi
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Zeta Delta Xi. Relevant discussions Misplaced Pages:Help desk#Zeta Delta Xi, Misplaced Pages:Help desk#Restoration of Article Zeta Delta Xi, User talk:Dru of Id#Restoration of Article Zeta Delta Xi, User talk:SarekOfVulcan#Restoration of Article Zeta Delta Xi. The article's third edit proposed it for speedy deletion , which you declined in the 5th edit . I do not know if you would consider yourself involved or neutral, but for a 160 (or 25) year old university fraternity with a place in equality history, although sources online are all tied to the organization, I am informing you of the discussion. Dru of Id (talk) 06:24, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Harry Potter
Template:WikiProject Harry Potter has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:34, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Speedy
You apparently were not notified about this speedy - https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User%3AEvilphoenix%2Fpotw&diff=567456927&oldid=45578088 Ronhjones 22:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 13:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Substitution at Template:Please sign
I'm not sure if you care or not, but, being the creator of the template, I thought I should inform you.
I requested that it not be substituted, because of the markup that would create. My rationale is that if we need to remind people to sign their posts (very beginner-level material) anyone who would be at a given talk page would see a bunch of HTML after the template is substituted. I find it a "cleaner" solution to have people use the template without substituting it.
So (directly contrary to what you said) placed {{Substitution|not}} on the page.
P.S. The fact that they took away your mop is totally whack. Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 06:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox theatre
Template:Infobox theatre has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Colorguard.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:04, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Harry Potter category
Template:Harry Potter category has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alakzi (talk) 22:04, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Please sign
Template:Please sign has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Just to let you know
You have been mentioned at Misplaced Pages:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 21:56, 7 October 2016 (UTC)please ping me