| Revision as of 20:02, 21 December 2009 editOff2riorob (talk | contribs)80,325 edits →3RR on Leib Tropper: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:13, 22 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| Again, welcome! ]<sup>]</sup> 17:12, 15 December 2009 (UTC) | Again, welcome! ]<sup>]</sup> 17:12, 15 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == December 2009 == | == December 2009 == | ||
| ] Please do not add content without citing ] and ], as you did to ]. Before making any potentially controversial ], it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> ]<sup><small |
] Please do not add content without citing ] and ], as you did to ]. Before making any potentially controversial ], it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> ]<sup>]</sup> 04:12, 15 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ] Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Misplaced Pages page, as you did at ]. Content of this nature could be regarded as ] and is in violation of ]. If you continue, you will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-biog3 --> ]<sup><small |
] Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Misplaced Pages page, as you did at ]. Content of this nature could be regarded as ] and is in violation of ]. If you continue, you will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-biog3 --> ]<sup>]</sup> 02:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. <br> The next time you add ], you '''will''' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-defamatory4 --> ]<sup><small |
] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. <br> The next time you add ], you '''will''' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-defamatory4 --> ]<sup>]</sup> 20:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Look, we have very specific policies about reliable sources. In particular, we need to take very special care with ]. Therefore, we cannot include sources that don't meet ]. This has nothing to do with any desire to suppress information. But we can't do this. If you want this to be included the proper thing to do is to get a reliable source that includes these. For example, a newspaper or such. Otherwise, we can't have them here. ] (]) 05:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC) | Look, we have very specific policies about reliable sources. In particular, we need to take very special care with ]. Therefore, we cannot include sources that don't meet ]. This has nothing to do with any desire to suppress information. But we can't do this. If you want this to be included the proper thing to do is to get a reliable source that includes these. For example, a newspaper or such. Otherwise, we can't have them here. ] (]) 05:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ] You have been temporarily blocked for continually adding ] negative material to ]. When your block expires, please ensure that you adhere to Misplaced Pages's sourcing policies. Thank you. ]<sup><small |
] You have been temporarily blocked for continually adding ] negative material to ]. When your block expires, please ensure that you adhere to Misplaced Pages's sourcing policies. Thank you. ]<sup>]</sup> 05:44, 18 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ==Alleged revocation of conversion== | ==Alleged revocation of conversion== | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| == 3RR on Leib Tropper == | == 3RR on Leib Tropper == | ||
| ] | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{#if: Leib Tropper |, as you are doing at ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> ] (]) 20:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | I see you have adding the link again, please revet your edit or I will make a report of your actions. ] (]) 22:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *I have reported you . ] (]) 22:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''] indefinitely''' from editing for repeated ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. ⇌ ] ] 00:03, 22 December 2009 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 --> | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=The other editor removed a link which other link on the same paragraph referred to. It is very confusing to have one source referring to another source which is not there, so I just put it back. It is also seem that the other editor is ultra orthodox by initially refusing to accept the Jewish Week as source while other editors do|decline=Could you be troubled to read our policy on ]? This appears to be a simple content dispute, in which you are limited to three reversions in a 24 hour period. Since you've been blocked for this before, you should be aware of this. I can't see why you're expecting to be unblocked if you intend to simply repeat your behavior. ] ] 14:28, 22 December 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
Latest revision as of 22:13, 22 April 2022
Welcome!
Hello, Truth Transparency. On behalf of WikiProject Judaism, welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question.
If you are interested in Judaism-related topics, you may want to check out WikiProject Judaism, where editors collaborate on articles relevant to Judaism.
Again, welcome! -shirulashem 17:12, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
December 2009
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Leib Tropper. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jayjg 04:12, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Misplaced Pages page, as you did at Leib Tropper. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Misplaced Pages policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Jayjg 02:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you add defamatory content, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Jayjg 20:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Look, we have very specific policies about reliable sources. In particular, we need to take very special care with biographies of living people. Therefore, we cannot include sources that don't meet our reliable source policy. This has nothing to do with any desire to suppress information. But we can't do this. If you want this to be included the proper thing to do is to get a reliable source that includes these. For example, a newspaper or such. Otherwise, we can't have them here. JoshuaZ (talk) 05:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked for continually adding poorly sourced negative material to biographies of living people. When your block expires, please ensure that you adhere to Misplaced Pages's sourcing policies. Thank you. Jayjg 05:44, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Alleged revocation of conversion
This is discussed on the Talk page. If you have an opinion, give it there. -- Zsero (talk) 20:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Warning - BLP
Jewcy is not a reliable source, and may not be used as a source on a BLP. -- Zsero (talk) 19:10, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
2nd warning. Jewcy is not a reliable source for a BLP. The Jewish Week is the only reliable source, though a weak one, for the allegation. Tropper's press release is a reliable source for his response. Stop adding Jewcy. If you don't like Tropper's response being quoted, then the whole allegation can go. -- Zsero (talk) 19:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
3rd warning. Stop adding Jewcy as a source on a BLP. -- Zsero (talk) 19:49, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
3RR on Leib Tropper
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Leib Tropper . If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
I see you have adding the link again, please revet your edit or I will make a report of your actions. Off2riorob (talk) 22:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- I have reported you here . Off2riorob (talk) 22:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 00:03, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Truth Transparency (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The other editor removed a link which other link on the same paragraph referred to. It is very confusing to have one source referring to another source which is not there, so I just put it back. It is also seem that the other editor is ultra orthodox by initially refusing to accept the Jewish Week as source while other editors do
Decline reason:
Could you be troubled to read our policy on WP:Edit warring? This appears to be a simple content dispute, in which you are limited to three reversions in a 24 hour period. Since you've been blocked for this before, you should be aware of this. I can't see why you're expecting to be unblocked if you intend to simply repeat your behavior. Kuru 14:28, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.