Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nick Schlee: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 01:51, 14 January 2010 editTyrenius (talk \| contribs)37,867 edits →Nick Schlee: Keep← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 19:01, 5 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk \| contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
			:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
			<!--Template:Afd top

			Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

			The result was '''keep'''. ] <sup><b>(])</b></sup> 03:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
	===]===		===]===
	{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|B}}

	:{{la\|Nick Schlee}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink\|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nick Schlee}}\|2=AfD statistics}})		:{{la\|Nick Schlee}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink\|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nick Schlee}}\|2=AfD statistics}})
Line 9:		Line 15:
	* '''Keep'''. Schlee's work has been widely exhibited and is held in collections of museums and universities. See ] section 4(d). I believe Schlee meets the criteria. — ] (]) 21:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)		* '''Keep'''. Schlee's work has been widely exhibited and is held in collections of museums and universities. See ] section 4(d). I believe Schlee meets the criteria. — ] (]) 21:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

	*'''Keep''' The Google news search only mentions his works were in a museum, that notable enough. Google book search, second page, reveals he was featured in "Artists in Britain since 1945, Volume 2‎". So some consider him a notable artist. ]''' 00:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC)		*'''Keep''' The Google news search only mentions his works were in a museum, that notable enough. Google book search, second page, reveals he was featured in "Artists in Britain since 1945, Volume 2‎". So some consider him a notable artist. ] 00:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
	*'''Keep''' per all of the above. ] (]) 01:44, 14 January 2010 (UTC)		*'''Keep''' per all of the above. ] (]) 01:44, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
	*'''Keep''' per all of above. Schlee is indeed in ''The Dictionary of Artists in Britain Since 1945'', which is a reputable source (not a "vanity" publication). Misplaced Pages follows sources. ''''']''''' 01:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC)		*'''Keep''' per all of above. Schlee is indeed in ''The Dictionary of Artists in Britain Since 1945'', which is a reputable source (not a "vanity" publication). Misplaced Pages follows sources. ''''']''''' 01:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
			** I'm sure there are many artist there. --] 13:59, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
			*'''Keep''' Seems notable and encyclopedic...] (]) 20:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
			*'''Speedy Keep''' The nomination seems uncertain ("I don't know") and there has been no attempt to discuss the matter at the article's talk page per ]. ] (]) 22:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
			*'''Comment'''. I believe that ] was not followed correctly in this case. In particular, under section 3, it would have been appropriate to add a <code><nowiki>{{notability}}</nowiki></code> tag before proposing deletion for this article. I would request that the original proposer follows ] before nominating any further AfDs in future. — ] (]) 12:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
			:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 19:01, 5 May 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 03:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Nick Schlee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems this artist haven't reached notability yet. His main claims of notability are having won two medals from the "Royal Drawing Society" (is this notable? I don't know) and having some of his word held by some universities and museums, but everything goes without a source. Damiens.rf 15:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Keep. Schlee's work has been widely exhibited and is held in collections of museums and universities. See WP:ARTIST section 4(d). I believe Schlee meets the criteria. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 21:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Keep The Google news search only mentions his works were in a museum, that notable enough. Google book search, second page, reveals he was featured in "Artists in Britain since 1945, Volume 2‎". So some consider him a notable artist. Dream Focus 00:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Keep per all of the above. Werner Heisenberg (talk) 01:44, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Keep per all of above. Schlee is indeed in The Dictionary of Artists in Britain Since 1945, which is a reputable source (not a "vanity" publication). Misplaced Pages follows sources. Ty 01:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sure there are many artist there. --Damiens.rf 13:59, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Keep Seems notable and encyclopedic...Modernist (talk) 20:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy Keep The nomination seems uncertain ("I don't know") and there has been no attempt to discuss the matter at the article's talk page per WP:BEFORE. Colonel Warden (talk) 22:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Comment. I believe that WP:BEFORE was not followed correctly in this case. In particular, under section 3, it would have been appropriate to add a {{notability}} tag before proposing deletion for this article. I would request that the original proposer follows WP:BEFORE before nominating any further AfDs in future. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.