Misplaced Pages

User talk:Talrias: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:30, 5 January 2006 editTalrias (talk | contribs)5,626 editsm Enough: altered remarks slightly← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:10, 8 April 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(392 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{not around|3=April 2006}}

<div style="background-color: #f4f4ff; padding: 10px; margin: 10px; border: 1px silver solid; font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Georgia';"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4ff; padding: 10px; margin: 10px; border: 1px silver solid; font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Georgia';">
Hi, welcome to my talk page! Please feel free to drop me comments about my contributions to Misplaced Pages. Critical messages are most appreciated. Hi, welcome to my talk page! Please feel free to drop me comments about my contributions to Misplaced Pages. Critical messages are most appreciated.
Line 20: Line 22:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


<h1 style="font-size: 17px; font-weight: bold; border-width: 0 0 1px 0; border-style: dotted; border-color: silver; background-color: #eaeafa; padding: 5px; margin: 10px 0; letter-spacing: -0.5px; font-variant: small-caps;">Current messages</h1> <h1 style="font-size: 17px; font-weight: bold; border-width: 0 0 1px 0; border-style: dotted; border-color: silver; background-color: #eaeafa; padding: 5px; margin: 10px 0; letter-spacing: -0.5px; font-variant: small-caps;">Current messages</h1>


== Oh noes! Please bring back your sanity! ==
==]==

This might interest you! ] ] 10:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

: Thanks for the heads-up. ] (] | ] | ]) 12:48, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

==]==

Hi Talrias - thanks for the verify tag. The figures came from another user who had credited Electoral Calculus; I'd created the table from his figures but deleted the source by accident. I agree the graph was awful, I created it in a rush, I'll have to go back and try again I think!! ] 14:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

: You can save Excel graphs as .gifs - save the chart as a .html file, open the HTML file up in a browser and you can save upload the image displayed. ] (] | ] | ]) 15:19, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

== ☻Welcome to Wikinews☺ ==

Welcome to wikinews. I hope you decide to stay. To see the full welcome goto ]. Happy editing. ] 20:51, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

: Thankyou, however my earliest contribution to Wikinews was back in May (which isn't too long after your first contribution). ] (] | ] | ]) 20:57, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

== Eire/ Éire ==

Thanks for education re corrections in articles as opposed to comments/discussions. I get it. So for me I would want to correct the 2 Eire instances in the ] article. A similar issue comes up concerning the use of ] as opposed to the correct trem ] when referring to the pre-1922 period and Ireland's membership of same.

BTW, I started to add this to your Discussion page but hope I reverted to your correct last version. If not sorry.

(] ] 03:19, 17 December 2005 (UTC))

: That's absolutely right! Don't worry, I've fixed your mistaken addition to my talk page archives. ] (] | ] | ]) 04:45, 17 December 2005 (UTC)



== Sinn Fein ==

I agree! The ''Northern Ireland political parties'' is a subcategory of ''Political parties in the United Kingdom''.
Therefore '''all''' the political parties of Northern Ireland (and of England, Scotland and Wales, too) are '''also''' political parties in the United Kingdom.

Thank you!--] 08:48, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

: That's my reasoning. ] (] | ] | ]) 16:18, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

== Protection of {{tl|unsigned}} ==

Howdy&mdash;I was just wondering about . Is pre-emptive protection O.K. these days? I know that the {{tl|test}} templates are, but I didn't think that there were others (and those ''have'' been vandalised, rather than it being a pre-emptive thing). I didn't see any comments about the protection on the talk page and was just wondering what your thinking was. ] ] 23:07, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

: I protected it because widely used templates like {{tl|unsigned}} are used on literally thousands of pages. If a malicious user decides to change the template, it's going to require each page which includes it to be recached, and then recached again when the vandalism is reverted. This obviously causes a problem for the various servers. ] (] | ] | ]) 23:11, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
:: O.K., thanks. ] ] 23:12, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

== Re: Karmafist ==

i've looked around, but i haven't seen where the elections are held. also it seemed like they were somehow canceled or postponed or changed in some way. i haven't been able to decode the wikispeak. seriously, Talrias, there is at present (and it will only get worse if the leadership - Jimbo + whomever - don't act soon about it) a crisis of credibility at Misplaced Pages. and i don't mean the stuff we're hearing on the news ], etc. that stuff is par for the course. i would expect things like that to happen (and eventually get corrected). the crisis of credibility is that a bunch of young (college-aged or thereabouts) and self-satisfied wikiheads have been inadequately vetted (or maybe the vetting was as good as one could expect) and vested with adminship when they are too immature to take on the responsibility and do it responsibly. these are nasty kids who have let the power of adminship go to their heads to the extent that they don't believe the civility rules apply to them. they are naked hypocrites who act as trolls and harrass editors and accuse anyone who confronts them about it as being trolls and for harrassment. they demand respect, but they do not offer any. WP will necessarily lose a lot of talent if the cops here treat them so badly. it '''will''' become a real crisis, but i believe it has already come to that point. regards. ] 03:40, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

: To keep this simple, I've replied on ], which is on my watchlist so I'll see any replies you make there. ] (] | ] | ]) 04:08, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

== Bobblewik and date delinking ==

I saw your comment on ]'s page, and thought you might want to add your feedback to ]. He is requesting bot permission to unlink the years in articles. I'm ambivalent about year delinking in general, but there are some specific cases that I'm against. ] 22:45, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

: Thanks for the heads-up. ] (] | ] | ]) 02:59, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

== AEJ Collins ==

Hi, according to the ], the years should not be linked unless they convey any specific information. ] 03:10, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

: That part of the manual of style is by no means fixed policy, in fact loads of people don't agree with it. As it's being discussed at the moment, it's best to leave articles as they previously were as a courtesy until the community comes to a consensus on what to do. ] (] | ] | ]) 03:14, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

::Where is this being discussed at the moment? At ], the only topics that have been discussed in the last month are: (1) whether the component parts of an article's title should be linked in the opening sentence, (2) Why the word ''potato'' is linked from the page, and (3) Whether "Only make" or "Make only" is a better title for the page. As far as I can tell, the issue of linking dates hasn't been discussed since February 2004, which strongly implies consensus ''has'' been reached on the issue. --] (]·]) 15:59, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

::: See ] and ]. ] (] | ] | ]) 18:34, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

== POV edits ==

At ]; care to elaborate?

] 18:34, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

: I was completely mistaken in my reversion. My apologies. I'm also sorry I didn't get around to answering your question sooner, and indeed I would have reverted myself shortly. ] (] | ] | ]) 18:11, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

::No worries. Feel free to give the self-flagellation a miss!

::] 19:15, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

::: Yeah, I think I should probably kick the habit soonish. :) ] (] | ] | ]) 20:14, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

== Sci.psychology.psychotherapy ==

Why did you protect ]? It's full of original research and npov, and the article is only tangentially about the usenet group. It even has a blatantly self-referential first section name to the effect of, "This article has verifiable research". Pfeh. --''']''' <sub>]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">]</span></sup> 18:57, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

: Because there was a revert-war in progress. ] (] | ] | ]) 18:59, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

:: Yeah, a revert war between anons and registered users. It might have more sense to semi-protect the page. The anons are the kooks who are trying to insert their blatant kookery POV. The registered users are the ones who are trying to carve down the article to something sensible on the topic of the newsgroup it is named after. --''']''' <sub>]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">]</span></sup> 19:02, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

::: Maybe, but see ]. :) ] (] | ] | ]) 19:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

:::*This page is protected in an effort to maintain the bad reporting and to extend bias and propaganda. I doubt anything discussed here will result in any major improvements to this rag of an article because the administrator(s) are hopelessly POV. They impose martial law because they are unwilling to admit that their position is weak. We can argue about the situation forever, but there is no doubt in my mind that unless you agree with the major contributors of this rag you will never get appeasement.
::::I accuse you of being biased and having deliberately protected THE WRONG PAGE. --''']''' <sub>]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">]</span></sup> 19:06, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

::::: I fully admit my heinous crime and I will ] shortly. ] (] | ] | ]) 19:08, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

== Dates ==

Yes, it's annoying when people stick their noses into situations they know nothing about, isn't it? But don't worry, I'm not engaged in ]. I saw you remove that section from the MoS, even though it has a lot of support, and so I reverted that and a few of your reverts of Bobblewik. I'm not sure why you say he shouldn't be doing it with a bot. He is following the MoS, that section has been there for awhile, it's widely accepted to the best of my knowledge, and he probably has permission to use the bot. So I will be doing it again. If you object, please discuss it on the MoS talk page. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 03:46, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

: He hasn't got bot permission, actually, otherwise you would see it on ]. In fact, you've contributed to the discussion about getting permission to use it and as you may have seen there is opposition there. ] (] | ] | ]) 03:59, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

::Well, if he's using it without permission, then of course he shouldn't be. I'm afraid I know almost nothing about how permission is granted. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 07:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

::: Is it possible for you to revert your rollbacks of my edits then? Thanks, ] (] | ] | ]) 15:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

== edit summaries ==

Please make your edit summaries ''completely'' accurate. was not because of the multiple changes you made. I'd also suggest to only make major changes, especially removals, after announcing your intent on the talk page and Village pump. -- ] ] 00:33, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


Talrias, don't slip down that slope of sanity and fall into the much of troubled ]s! --] 02:30, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
: What's wrong with the edit? There weren't any removals of anything but commented-out code. ] (] | ] | ]) 00:50, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
:Talrias is already at the bottom of the sanity slope, surely? :P -- ] 03:57, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
:*True, he's a Kiwi afterall. --] 19:54, 15 April 2006 (UTC)


== Personal attacks == == Approvals group ==


Just wanted to let you know that I have removed references to the approvals group from both the main bots page and the approvals page. See ] for my reasoning. <small>]</small><sup>] | ] | ]</sup> ---- 00:31, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
I've removed the personal attacks again, per ], and I'd appreciate it if you would not restore them. Your behavior is very surprising for an admin. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 10:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


==Hiya==
: You can't do something "per" a disputed guideline. And even if it were policy, it's not up to you to interpret that they are "personal attacks" - which they are not - since you are involved in the discussion. ] (] | ] | ]) 10:38, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


Hi Chris - hope you're feeling better.
::They are very much personal attacks, which is why you made them, and any user is allowed to remove personal attacks made against them. More importantly, your behavior is completely inappropriate for an admin. Getting involved in wheel wars, and revert warring to retain personal attacks? Shame on you. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 10:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


You might be interested to know that my son - Brookie Jr is off to Clifton in the autumn of 2007! ] ] 17:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
::: It takes two to revert war. What aspect of my behaviour in particular are you unhappy with? And I would suggest you examine your own attitude before criticising others. ] (] | ] | ]) 11:07, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


== ] election ==
== I've nicked your user page theme from Mindspillage, hope you don't mind ==


There is a current ''election'' in progress for a new member of the Bot Approvals Group. The discussion is being held on ]. Thank you, — ] ] 23:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Dear Talrias: In an amusingly round-about way, I've nicked (and hacked to death) ]'s user page theme, which she in turn nicked from you. I do hope you don't mind; thanks for designing it in the first place! :-) All the best, --] | ] 16:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
*This user has been inactive for just over a year. --] 01:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
==]==
{{User:Android_Mouse_Bot_2/intro|Misplaced Pages:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week/current}} fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: <br><center>'''Content moved a while ago, redirect no longer needed, only a handful of historical/obsolete pages link here'''</center>{{User:Android_Mouse_Bot_2/end|Misplaced Pages:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week/current}} --] 18:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


==Project European Union==
: I insist you remove it at once! Of course you're most welcome to use it and glad you like it. :) ] (] | ] | ]) 16:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Hello {{PAGENAME}}, you are member of the project European Union. I try to create a new project page for the project. You can see it at ] Because this should be the project page for all it´s members, please tell me, what you think about it. Please leave your comments on the ] of the project.--] 11:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)


{{User:Ssolbergj/question}}
== Merry belated xmas ==


You deserve better. How about a nice glass of lemonade? ] 17:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


==Redirect of ]==
: I completely agree and I would love a nice refreshing ]. ] (] | ] | ]) 17:50, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
]Hello, this is a message from ]. A tag has been placed on ], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]),}} another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ] is a redirect to a non-existent page (]). <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at ]. Feel free to contact the ] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.''' ] 15:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


== Featured List of the Day Experiment ==
== Bobblewik ==


There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all ]'s in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at ]. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to ] and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--] <small>(]/]/]/]) </small> 15:36, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Believe it or not, I think he's doing it manually. At least the first sentence of ], which seems to be used by other people, not just him, is "This is not a bot..." Or did am I missing something? ]·] 20:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


== Speedy deletion of ] ==
: I think it's best to keep this on ]. Someone else has raised a similar point; hopefully my answer to him satisfactorily answers your concerns. ] (] | ] | ]) 21:01, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.


If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).
== Tirben ==
-- ] ] 02:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


Thanks. --] (]) 20:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
: Considering we have no shops I'm impressed you could buy one. Then again, since we have no electricity either the postcard would be quite accurate if you got it. ;) ] (] | ] | ]) 02:07, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


== Speedy deletion of ] ==
::I bought it from ], who miraculouly appears in any location where there's some money to be made. I don't recommend the rat-on-a-stick, mind... -- ] ] 02:09, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.


If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).
::: I'll take that under advisement and attempt to have it passed as a law in Tirben ASAP. ] (] | ] | ]) 02:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


Thanks. --] (]) 02:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I say, what steps need to be taken for me to aquire genuine Tirbenian citizenship? What officials require the least bribing? ''''']]]''''' 06:30, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


== Could you please explain more fully... ==
: Actually, according to our , all you need to do to become a Tirbenian citizen is register on the forums. Immigration has never been so easy. ] (] | ] | ]) 12:43, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


Could you please explain ] to ]? ] (]) 19:40, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
::Fantastic! No red tape! I will look into that shortly...(happy New Year, by the way.) ''''']]]''''' 21:34, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


== ] ==
== ] ==
] has been nominated for a ]. Lists are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the lst to ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. Reviewers' concerns are ]. -- <span style="font-family:Chiller; font-size:medium;">''']]'''<sub>]]</sub></span> 01:53, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


==] of ]==
That was fast. :) ] 19:36, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
]


The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
: My finger's always on the pulse. ] (] | ] | ]) 19:37, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
:<b>This isn't a political party, it is one or two independent councillors in Ashfield, and they aren't notable. I can't find any news coverage of them as a group, only a few passing references to one of their councillors, Roy Adkins (and he's not a notable person).</b>


While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].
== haiku ==


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
If you read the ] article that you linked to, you would find that modern English-language haiku is not the syllable-counting exercise that most people are familar with (usually from grade school English classes), nor is it the joke "haiku" represented by spam haiku, redneck haiku and haiku error messages. Instead, haiku should be 17 syllables or less, almost always have a ] (or season word), and usually have a kireji (or cutting word). "Cold fog" is a winter kigo, and the singing mockingbird is a spring kigo. The ] and the ] are the kireji (i.e. a strong pause or syntactic break in the text&mdash;usually something stronger a poetic ]). ]] 05:34, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ]<span style="background-color:white; color:grey;">&amp;</span>] 01:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
==Removed COTWs==
I apoligize. It's fixed now, but thanks for letting me know by the way.]''']]''' 15:58, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


==Bobblewik block==
Talrias, I have to ask you to stop blocking Bobblewik. You've blocked him twice despite being deeply involved in the content dispute: not just involved but possibly the main advocate of the other "side." I wouldn't mind you blocking a bot (whether you're involved or not) if it has no permission or might be causing damage, but you are leading the opposition to unlinking years, and you've revert warred over the MoS regarding that issue, which means it's inappropriate for you to block the user you're opposing. Please see ]. Perhaps you could put a note on AN/I instead and ask another admin to block if you feel one is warranted. Many thanks, ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 02:43, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


==File source problem with File:UK general election results.png==
: Perhaps you could read ] too, which states "it is a matter of courtesy and common sense to consult the blocking admin, rather than unblocking yourself". ] (] | ] | ]) 02:48, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.


If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''' per Misplaced Pages's ], ]. If the image is ] and ], '''the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)''' per ] criterion ]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 12:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
::Yes, I very much agree with that part of the policy (though you clearly do not, given your previous actions), but where there is such an obvious violation of the policy, it would be absurd to let the block stand. Note that I have no opinion as to whether he ought to be blocked and if someone uninvolved reblocks, I won't interfere, but I am requesting that you not be the one to do it in the future over this particular issue, because in blocking you are gaining the upper hand in a content dispute. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 03:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


::: What previous actions? And despite your agreement with it, you didn't follow it here. Also, could you explain how I'm gaining the upper hand in any "content dispute"? This is a policy disagreement, for one thing, and there are other people who agree with Bobblewik on this issue (such as yourself) who have been involving themselves more in the discussion than he has. My block was not to "gain the upper hand" (which doesn't seem to presume much good faith in my actions) but was a forceful way of stopping his edits since he's previously ignored requests to do so given the opposition to both the section of the MOS in question and the applicability of using a bot to do so. ] (] | ] | ]) 03:14, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


==File permission problem with File:UK general election results.png==
== Good Haiku ==
]
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.


If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
...I'm glad it meets your standards. Good one on my talk page too :). ''''']]]''''' 07:28, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
* make a note permitting reuse under the ] or another acceptable free license (see ]) '''at the site of the original publication'''; or
* Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to '''{{NoSpamEmail|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}''', stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter ].


If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to '''{{NoSpamEmail|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}'''.
== Poll on years of birth/death ==
Hi, you may want to participate in the poll at ] -- User:Docu


If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ], and add a ] justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
: Thanks for letting me know; I've voted. ] (] | ] | ]) 15:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 12:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
==Your request for clarification of reasons==


I've pretty much said it all on my talk page. Let me know if you have any further questions (I figured you are just copy and pasting to all arbitrators and didn't actually read the discussion on my talk page yet) ] | ] 23:25, 4 January 2006 (UTC) :Butting in here &mdash; facts are not copyrightable. My non-lawyer take on this is that you can probably <s>reproduce</s> recreate the chart without copyright problems, even if you can't use the exact file. --] (]) 18:11, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
::Oh, of course this analysis &mdash; for which I take no responsibility, in case anyone should get in copyright trouble &mdash; is based on my limited understanding of ''US'' law. That's mostly what matters here, given that the servers are in the US. But if ''you're'' in the UK, could things be different for you personally? No idea. --] (]) 07:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)


== ] of ] ==
: Yes, that's right. Sorry for not checking first, I'll read it now and get back to you. ] (] | ] | ]) 23:27, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ]&nbsp;<sup></span>]]</sup> 07:09, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


==Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity==
I think some serious mistakes were made but the fire storm that resulted is lesson enough. I really am just amused by userboxes, think they are fun and provide a vehicle for folks to hook up here regarding common interests. I don't wholely support factions, but regard them as inevitable and would not punish those naive enough to organize openly. Obviously userboxes are not the place for fair use images, Fair use is mostly educational purpose and userboxes are mostly play. I support play. ] 23:35, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
{{ {{#ifeq:|{{void}}|void|Error:must be substituted}}|Inactive admin}}
]
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 22:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


==Notice of change==
:The fire storm that resulted is lesson enough. The administrators involved need to have the grace to back down and apologize. Whatever you may think, those three are some of our best people. ] 23:51, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a ] to the ] that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new ]. Until December 30, you can file a request at ] for review by the crats. Thank you. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


<small>(delivered by <small style="font: 12px Courier New; color: #000000; display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 3px 1px 4px;background-color:#fff">]</small> 23:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC))</small>
:: Ok, thanks for your comments - and I don't disagree over their worth as editors. ] (] | ] | ]) 23:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)


== An RfC that you ''may'' be interested in... ==
== Enough ==


As one of the previous contributors to {{Tl|Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a ] started on the talk page as to ]. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
Talrias, thank you for restoring that material to the talk page. I have no idea how it happened and can only assume it was some kind of server glitch, because all I did was leave a message using the button the top of the page, rather than editing the whole page. As for the images, the painting has been released for promotional purposes, so it isn't covered by the normal fair-use terms, and the field of flowers is in the process of having a free license granted. But trying to cause a problem here looks vindictive, so I am requesting that you have no further contact with me. You caused a lot of trouble and bad feeling over the Marsden situation, undoing a block not once, but twice, a block that was important to the community as evidenced by Jimbo himself extending it. You caused a further problem over the date linking, making personal attacks on me on a talk page and engaging in a revert war when I tried to remove them. You then blocked the main party in that content dispute, even though you were not only directly involved in the dispute, but were in fact the instigator of it. Now you're trying to deplete my user page of images, even though you are elsewhere supporting someone who is trying to keep fair-use images on user pages. It is too much. Please don't respond to this. I really would very much prefer no further contact. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 01:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
: <small>This message was sent by ] (]) on behalf of <span class="nowrap">&#123;&#123;U&#124;]&#125;&#125;</span> <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Technical 13@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:Infobox_film/list&oldid=598721132 -->
== ] of ] ==
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 18:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)


== ] ==
: Well, this is so full of lies I have to respond in order that someone else reading this page doesn't get the wrong impression. Firstly, I could never have known that about the two images. Regardless of the nature of their current status, the fact is, they are fair use images and are not permitted. I quote: "ll other uses, even if legal under the fair use clauses of copyright law, should be avoided to keep the use of unfree images to a minimum". I must insist you remove them.


Hi,<br>
: I have already given my reasoning for the Marsden situation, and set up an RFC, and I invited you to comment. You can do so at ]. I did not "undo" the block, which would imply that he was completely unblocked; I actually shortened it to a period of 2 weeks, he was still blocked.
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=693174033 -->


== TFL notification ==
: I was not the "main instigator" of the date linking, and I blocked him in accordance with the blocking policy for bots. I made my actions clear at all times when doing this; and a later request for you to ] resulted in full agreement from everyone who commented that my actions were fully appropriate.


Hi, Talrias. I'm just posting to let you know that ] – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as ] for November 6. The TFL blurb can be seen ]. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at ]. Regards, ] (]) 21:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
: My comments were not "personal attacks", I reject that definition of them. You initially removed my comments, clarifying them as personal attacks, an action which is not supported by any policy. It was you who caused the revert war by editing my comments.
:Just letting you know that the list has been pulled from TFL due to a dispute. ] (]) 15:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
::The article has now been re-scheduled for ]. ] (]) 23:22, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
== Pro-Choice listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Pro-Choice'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ]]] 13:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of Template:Collab-eu ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 18:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of Template:Collab-uk ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 18:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of Template:Newcotw ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 20:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
: I assume you are referring to ]. I do support in general his actions on Misplaced Pages, but I disagree with his actions regarding fair use images. I have in fact clarified my position on this only recently, as you can see in .
<blockquote>'''Orphaned image. A proposed flag for a micronation of[REDACTED] editors which existed on IRC and a ]. ]'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
: So, to sum it up, your comment above is so full of lies, misinformation and patent nonsense it is difficult for me to understand them. In the spirit of good faith, I must only assume you ]. ] (] | ] | ]) 02:13, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
::Now you are calling me a liar, ignorant, and you have vandalized my user page. Your earlier comments were most certainly personal attacks. I mean this, Talrias. ''Leave me alone''. Rightly or wrongly, I feel you are now harassing me. I have nothing to do with the current fair-use debate and have no wish to be involved in it. Your involvement in the Marsden situation is over, thanks to Jimbo. And I was only briefly involved in the debate over numbers. There is therefore no need for us to have further contact, and I am asking you most sincerely to respect that. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 02:29, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="color:#fff;background:Blue">&nbsp;★&nbsp;</span> ] ] 03:08, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
::: You just said I vandalised your user page, when I actually removed fair use images - after asking you to remove them twice - which is forbidden by our policy on this. I don't find that a particularly truthful comment. ] (] | ] | ]) 02:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
== Nomination for merger of ] ==
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> <span style="background:#000dff; padding:2px;">''']'''&nbsp;</span> (]) - just another roadgeek 01:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:10, 8 April 2023

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Talrias has not edited Misplaced Pages since April 2006. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hi, welcome to my talk page! Please feel free to drop me comments about my contributions to Misplaced Pages. Critical messages are most appreciated.

Notes

  • If you are coming here because I left a message on your talk page, please reply there! I add people's talk pages to my watchlist after I leave a comment, so I will see any replies you make. I only remove the page from my watchlist a week or so after the discussion has ended.
  • I will reply to your comments on this page only, unless you request otherwise (so you may wish to add it to your own watchlist after adding your comments). I may leave a note on your talk page informing you I have replied.
  • Please remember to sign your comments.

Add a new comment!

Archives

Archives are made of completed discussions, at least a week old, on the date the archive is made. They are created by simply copying and pasting the text into the archive page; the discussion history is therefore on the main talk page.

Current messages

Oh noes! Please bring back your sanity!

Talrias, don't slip down that slope of sanity and fall into the much of troubled dendrites! --Durin 02:30, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Talrias is already at the bottom of the sanity slope, surely? :P -- Joolz 03:57, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Approvals group

Just wanted to let you know that I have removed references to the approvals group from both the main bots page and the approvals page. See Misplaced Pages Talk:Bots for my reasoning. Pegasus1138 ---- 00:31, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Hiya

Hi Chris - hope you're feeling better.

You might be interested to know that my son - Brookie Jr is off to Clifton in the autumn of 2007! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! 17:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:BAG election

There is a current election in progress for a new member of the Bot Approvals Group. The discussion is being held on WT:BAG. Thank you, — xaosflux 23:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week/current

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Misplaced Pages:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week/current, by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Misplaced Pages:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week/current fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
Content moved a while ago, redirect no longer needed, only a handful of historical/obsolete pages link here

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Misplaced Pages:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week/current, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Project European Union

Hello Talrias, you are member of the project European Union. I try to create a new project page for the project. You can see it at here Because this should be the project page for all it´s members, please tell me, what you think about it. Please leave your comments on the talkpage of the project.--Thw1309 11:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)



Redirect of Warcraft races

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Warcraft races, by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Warcraft races is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Warcraft races, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 15:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Featured List of the Day Experiment

There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 15:36, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:UKCOTWC

A tag has been placed on Template:UKCOTWC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:British politics/party colours/Liberal Party

A tag has been placed on Template:British politics/party colours/Liberal Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Could you please explain more fully...

Could you please explain why you moved mortar (artillery) to mortar (weapon)? Geo Swan (talk) 19:40, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom

List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom has been nominated for a featured list removal. Lists are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the lst to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 01:53, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ashfield Independents

The article Ashfield Independents has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This isn't a political party, it is one or two independent councillors in Ashfield, and they aren't notable. I can't find any news coverage of them as a group, only a few passing references to one of their councillors, Roy Adkins (and he's not a notable person).

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fences&Windows 01:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


File source problem with File:UK general election results.png

Thanks for uploading File:UK general election results.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 12:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)


File permission problem with File:UK general election results.png

Thanks for uploading File:UK general election results.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 12:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Butting in here — facts are not copyrightable. My non-lawyer take on this is that you can probably reproduce recreate the chart without copyright problems, even if you can't use the exact file. --Trovatore (talk) 18:11, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Oh, of course this analysis — for which I take no responsibility, in case anyone should get in copyright trouble — is based on my limited understanding of US law. That's mostly what matters here, given that the servers are in the US. But if you're in the UK, could things be different for you personally? No idea. --Trovatore (talk) 07:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Helpme

Template:Helpme has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Access Denied  07:09, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 22:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

(delivered by mabdul 23:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC))

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cotw1

Template:Cotw1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 18:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Talrias. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 6. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Just letting you know that the list has been pulled from TFL due to a dispute. Giants2008 (Talk) 15:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
The article has now been re-scheduled for December 18. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:22, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Pro-Choice listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pro-Choice. Since you had some involvement with the Pro-Choice redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. feminist 13:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Collab-eu

Template:Collab-eu has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Collab-uk

Template:Collab-uk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Newcotw

Template:Newcotw has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Tirben-flag.png

Notice

The file File:Tirben-flag.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image. A proposed flag for a micronation of[REDACTED] editors which existed on IRC and a User subpage. WP:NOTWEBHOST

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ★  Bigr Tex 03:08, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Help me-helped

Template:Help me-helped has been nominated for merging with Template:Help me. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 01:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Categories:
User talk:Talrias: Difference between revisions Add topic