| Revision as of 20:16, 6 February 2010 editCTF83! (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,457 edits →Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Linda Harasim← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:40, 9 December 2024 edit undoB-bot (talk | contribs)Bots534,464 edits Notification that File:Treehouse of Horror IXc.jpg is orphaned and will be deleted in seven days per WP:CSD#F5 | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=User talk: |
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=User talk:CTF83!/Archive index|mask=User talk:CTF83!/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{atnhead}} | |archiveheader = {{atnhead}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 200K | |maxarchivesize = 200K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 10 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 0 | |minthreadsleft = 0 | ||
| |algo = old(7d) | |algo = old(7d) | ||
| |archive = User talk: |
|archive = User talk:CTF83!/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }}{{AutoArchivingNotice|small=yes|age=7|index=./Archive index|bot=MiszaBot III}} | }}<!--{{AutoArchivingNotice|small=yes|age=7|index=./Archive index|bot=MiszaBot III}}--> | ||
| {{archives|small=yes|index=/Archive index}} | {{archives|small=yes|search=yes|index=/Archive index}} | ||
| __toc__ | __toc__ | ||
| {{-}} | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Treehouse of Horror IXc.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| I'd like to get your opinion on this one. ] (]) 15:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Favor == | |||
| Another administrator deleted my userpage. They gave a good reason as to why, but I asked if they could restore it for a day or so, so I could copy the information to another wiki host. They agreed on that, but they never did it. So I was wondering if you could go through this accounts records, and restore the information just temporarily? ] (]) 05:38, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry, I'm not an admin, otherwise I'd help you. <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 05:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : I on the original admin's page, but I'm afraid that's all I can do. <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 05:55, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Oh, sorry I thought you were. I would totally nominate you. Thanks again. :) ] (]) 05:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Any time! <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 05:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{done}} I'm not sure what the problem was the first time, but I've restored the page for a second time as per Phrasia's request above. Phrasia, please let me know when you've made a copy. -- see ]. -- ] (]) 12:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit-warring == | |||
| Don't believe everything you hear on IRC. This is part, as both Doncram and Orlady will acknowledge, of a painfully tedious argument between a whole raft of editors over merges and splits between localities and historic districts that has rendered the NRHP project toxic. I'm surprised that Orlady got herself drawn into this. However, cries of admin abuse don't help, and this is a garden variety case of two editors being peeved at each other. See Doncram vs. Polaron. The terminology that Doncram favors makes me break out in hives, but I'd prefer to let it stand in favor of the greater good. '''<font face="Arial">] <sub><small>]</small></sub></font>''' 00:39, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Ok, she did break 3RR, and thus should be blocked like any other user who breaks it. Off topic, how do I site when an author has 2 books I'm using. ie, I can't just put their last name and page number like I did with one book ]. <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 00:42, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm aware of the 3RR issue, but would rather it be reviewed by others. I'm too involved in the main dispute to render judgment, and frankly too irritated at all parties. | |||
| ::For citing, do you have refTools enabled in your Preferences/Gadgets tab? It gives a "cite" at the end of the editing tools bar above the edit window that opens a menu of options for filling out references. '''<font face="Arial">] <sub><small>]</small></sub></font>''' 00:48, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Elaborating on refs, you'd do two full cites, then for further cites you'd just do something like "Smith, "The Color Blue", p. 40" and "Smith, "Skies and their Hues", p.441." '''<font face="Arial">] <sub><small>]</small></sub></font>''' 00:52, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::(ec) I understand how to cite and such, but for example ref 3 at ] says "Svendsen, p. 19". I'm adding a second book by her, how do I clarify in the cite which of the ] I'm using? Would it be something like "Svendsen,Davenport A Pictorial History p. 19"?.....Ok, you answered it when I got the ec, thanks. <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 00:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| Hi there, | |||
| I appreciate your help with the 3rr thing. I'm not a fan of noticeboards so I'm not skilled at posting and the template seems hoary to me. That was very nice of you to put it in your sandbox. If I can ever return the favor, although nothing tech related, I'd be happy to help. These are for you: ]] 06:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you! In case you didn't know, we have ] you can use to show appreciation for any user you feel deserves it. :) <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 17:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::I 2nd the thank you. Even though I love The Drama, it's not so much fun being a part of it. I'd use a barnstar, but I'm equally wiki-inept. :) ] (]) 20:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thank you both! If either of you need assistance, just ask, and I'll provide if I can. <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 20:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | is awarded to ] For offering help without being asked and going the extra mile to give it. Really appreciate that.]] 20:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Same Sex Marriage == | |||
| Hi, thanks for deciding to contribute to this article! There is currently consensus on the talk page. I see you editted the article without discussing on the talk page. If you feel there is something that does not belong please come on in and explain what's wrong. Until then though I'm going to put the article back the way it was with the cited material there.] (]) 18:22, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Feel free to do so, but you will be reported for 3RR. <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 18:24, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for comment == | |||
| I have opened a request for comment at ]. While the RFC is named for him alone, the behavior of Polaron and Orlady should also be considered as well. I would encourage you to participate in a civil manner in this discussion, in hopes of finding a reasonable resolution. --] <sup>]</sup> 23:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm not exactly sure what is going on. What exactly do I do at the RfC? Propose restrictions or something of the sort? <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 08:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::I think at this point, you can either certify the basis of this dispute, or add an outside view. If you have an outside view on the conflict between Doncram and Orlady, your opinion would be useful at this point. I'm not sure it would be useful yet to propose editing restrictions, since there isn't much discussion yet (and since Doncram hasn't responded). I'm not 100% familiar with the RfC process, either, and I'd rather not be familiar with it at all. I'd rather be figuring out the difference between ] and ] as it applies to any individual building, but since the edit wars keep spreading, I unfortunately have to get involved in user conduct. --] <sup>]</sup> 22:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ok, thanks, I'll comment after work. <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 23:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I've begun to put together an outline for an RfC on the NRHP content disputes at ], to be moved to some more appropriate place once it's developed. I'll be working on it in between bouts of snow shoveling, and you're encouraged to contribute as you desire. '''<font face="Arial">] <sub><small>]</small></sub></font>''' 17:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hey Ctjf83, it's Hunter Kahn. I'm conducting the ] for ], and the nominator told me that you had conducted a previous GAN review for it. I believe he indicated it was quick-failed, but I couldn't find a prior GAN review page for it. Can you tell me if one was conducted, because if so, I want to make sure any concerned raised back then were addressed. Thanks! — <b>]] ]]</b> 03:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I didn't make a GA page (probably should've) but it was still tagged at the top and a lot of {{cn}} tags, so I didn't bother with a GA page. <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 05:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks Ctj, --] <sup>]</sup> 11:53, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::: LOL, a little past christmas! <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 19:05, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned non-free use-notice --> --] (]) 18:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| The result is fine - the consensus is to keep. However, your rationale "Keep Passes WP:Prof (WP:NACD)" is flawed. Notability guidelines are only '''guidelines''', they describe "what usualy happens on afd" they do not proscribe what must happen. Providing no ''policy'' overrides other considerations, an article is kept or deleted on the basis of whether there is a consensus to delete or not. In this case, there was no consensus to delete (indeed possibly a consensus to keep) so the article is kept. However, even if the article does pass some guideline, that's would not override consensus.--] 20:06, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :So Just a Keep is sufficient on all AfDs? No reasoning is required? <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 20:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::No reasoning is good. But the reason isn't that it passes a guideline, the reason is that most people want to keep it and have offered perfectly valid reasons to do so. Most people think it is notable.--] 20:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ok, if you have a few minutes, care to look over my other closes? <font face="Kristen ITC">] ]</font> 20:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:40, 9 December 2024
 Archives |
| Index |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Orphaned non-free image File:Treehouse of Horror IXc.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Treehouse of Horror IXc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
