Revision as of 01:36, 12 February 2010 view sourceSourside21 (talk | contribs)388 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:02, 15 October 2023 view source WOSlinker (talk | contribs)Administrators858,401 editsm Fix lint errors | ||
(19 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Dude, I happen to agree with you about the ] edit, it's uncited speculation. However, you are doing yourself no favours by failing to explain your reasons for the edit and continuously blanking your comments page. You have nothing to hide, and your edit makes sense. The issue is one of explanation and openness. Cheers ] (]) 07:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | Dude, I happen to agree with you about the ] edit, it's uncited speculation. However, you are doing yourself no favours by failing to explain your reasons for the edit and continuously blanking your comments page. You have nothing to hide, and your edit makes sense. The issue is one of explanation and openness. Cheers ] (]) 07:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Please contribute == | |||
requires your input as you are the one wanting the material to remain, and you are the one who started this. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<span style="color:blue;">!!</span> ]<span style="color:red;">a</span> ] <span style="color:blue;">!!</span>'''''</span> 21:26, 20 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Why? == | |||
Care to tell me what the purpose of was? <b class="IPA">]</b> (]) 22:46, 30 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Blocked== | |||
I see from that you are still edit warring without making any attempts at discussion. As you have already been blocked for this same thing before and have not learned, I see no point in letting you keep your editing privileges until you familiarize yourself with our '''']'''. <b class="IPA">]</b> (]) 22:52, 30 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''indefinite''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. <b class="IPA">]</b> (]) 22:52, 30 January 2011 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
Latest revision as of 08:02, 15 October 2023
OnLive
Dude, I happen to agree with you about the OnLive edit, it's uncited speculation. However, you are doing yourself no favours by failing to explain your reasons for the edit and continuously blanking your comments page. You have nothing to hide, and your edit makes sense. The issue is one of explanation and openness. Cheers MrMarmite (talk) 07:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Please contribute
This discussion requires your input as you are the one wanting the material to remain, and you are the one who started this. !! Justa Punk !! 21:26, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Why?
Care to tell me what the purpose of this was? rʨanaɢ (talk) 22:46, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Blocked
I see from this edit that you are still edit warring without making any attempts at discussion. As you have already been blocked for this same thing before and have not learned, I see no point in letting you keep your editing privileges until you familiarize yourself with our 'edit warring policy. rʨanaɢ (talk) 22:52, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of indefinite for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. rʨanaɢ (talk) 22:52, 30 January 2011 (UTC)