User talk:Bokpasa: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 08:47, 13 May 2010 editEcemaml (talk \| contribs)6,931 edits →Warning ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 08:05, 5 January 2012 edit undoBulwersator (talk \| contribs)17,067 edits Notification: nomination at templates for discussion of Template:Campaignbox Almohad Empire battles. (TW)
(26 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== Please explain your actions ==
	==]==

			As you did on ] and ]. You marked major edits as minor (And they are definitely not minor by any means). You have not been discussing your edits, and your edit comment is borderline on personal attacking. - ] \| <sup>] and ]</sup> 10:17, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
	I believe that the rulers of Morocco page should include all dynasties that have ruled Morocco or who historians have judges ruled Morocco. All I was doing was reverting the deletion of a huge segment of the page that made it look like there were no rulers in Morocco before the seventeenth century. I would abide by any concensus against this but looking at the talk page ] there appears to be a concensus that this information should remain. ] 16:36, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

			: Bokpassa, if you pull your stunts again, I am going to request a user ban on you. ] (]) 18:53, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
	==Unspecified source for ]==

			== Almoravid-Almohad-Marinid-Wattasid-Saadi ==

			Exactly what is you disagree with in those articles? --] (]) 19:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
	]
	Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

			== Battle of Río Salado ==
	As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl\|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp\|non-free fair use in\|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

			Could you post an explanation on the talk page of ] outlining what issues you have with the article? It helps explain why you have tagged the article as unbalanced. Thank you. --] (]) 19:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
	If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 12:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Image source --> ]≈<small>]</small> 12:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

	== ~~Idrisid~~ ~~Map~~ ==		== August 2011 ==
			] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]. Users are expected to ] with others and avoid editing ].<br>
	What exactly is wrong with the Idrisid map? I saw your comment on the map's page. What needs to be corrected?] (]) 14:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
			In particular, the ] states that:
			# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.'''
			# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
			If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you continue to edit war, you '''may be ] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] 04:46, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

			] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-error3 --> ''<br>You seem to not understand that only one country (the most relevant one) should be in those Category generating fields. ''per ]'' See examples ] ] ] <br>
	:I see your point, those are errors, that should probably be corrected. Possibly in the future you could post those on the map's talk page too, so people could see them. ] (]) 13:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
		⚫	'' ] (]) 23:12, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
			==Talkback==
			{{talkback\|Ioeth\|Tachfin\|ts=23:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)}}
			] <small>(] ] ])</small> 23:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

			== Your 3RR report about ] ==

			Hello Bokpasa. I have , since most of the fields were blank and you didn't say who you were reporting. Please try again if the problem still exists and be sure we can read your report. Thank you, ] (]) 23:53, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
	==Image copyright problem with Image:800px-Idrisids Dynasty 788-985.PNG==
	Thanks for uploading ]. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Misplaced Pages can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate ], it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{tl\|PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{tlx\|self\|CC-by-sa-3.0\|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag ] - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

			==] case==
	For more information on using images, see the following pages:
			{\| align="left" style="background: transparent;"
	* ]
			\|\| ]
	* ]
			\|}
			Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page.
			] (]) 01:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
			{{tmbox
			\| style = background: #f8eaba;
			\| image = ]
			\| text = <big>'''Blocked for sock puppetry'''</big>
			'''''You have been ] ''''' from editing for a period of '''2 weeks''' for ] per evidence presented at ]. Note that multiple accounts are ], ''but'' using them for ] reasons is '''not'''. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to ].
			If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the ] first. ''']'''] 17:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->
			}}
			{{unblock reviewed \| 1=Mmm Why am locked out? Because if it is because a person has been found that other user types in the same items that I ... insufficient reason ... \| decline=You are blocked for the reasons explained ]: it is confirmed by ] that {{user0\|Luciusmaximus}} is an account created after you were warned for edit-warring, to make the same disruptive edits. If you create more ], or you continue to edit-war about Morocco after your block expires, your next block will be longer, perhaps indefinite. ] (]) 17:15, 26 August 2011 (UTC)}}

			==] case==
	This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. ] (]) 18:34, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
			{\| align="left" style="background: transparent;"
			\|\| ]
			\|}
			Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] (]) 03:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

	== ~~References~~ ==		== Reblocked ==

			For evading your block per the evidence at ], I've reset your block to two weeks. Next time it will be much longer. — ] <sup>]</sup> 03:37, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
	Unless content that you are adding is common knowledge, you should add references (see ] for how and ] for why). This is especially true if the information you are adding is obscure or contentious. ] (]) 00:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
			:And for evading yet again per evidence at the same SPI page, you're now indefinitely blocked. — ] <sup>]</sup> 02:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

			==] case==
	== Edit-warring on ] ==
			{\| align="left" style="background: transparent;"
			\|\| ]
			\|}
			Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] ] 04:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

			==] case==
	'''Please stop''' I am posting the same message on ] and ]. You both need to stop ] and accusing one another of ]. If you need a third party to mediate, I suggest that you read ]. —]❤]☮]☺]☯ 17:27, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
			{\| align="left" style="background: transparent;"
			\|\| ]
			\|}
			Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] ] 16:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

			==] case==
	== 3RR ==
			{\| align="left" style="background: transparent;"

			\|\| ]
	:Hello,
			\|}
	:I reported your revertings to the Edit Warring noticeboard: .
			Your name has been mentioned in connection with a ] case. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] ] 23:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
	:You know that you are banned on the French and Spanish sections because of that, I hope you will stop editing articles using your POV instead of sources and links, as you just did
			== ] of ] ==
⚫	:] (]) 19:55, 24 ~~April~~ ~~2010~~ (UTC)
			]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 08:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

	== Greater Morocco ==

	'''Your edit''' Your edit to this page is ungrammatical and appears to be either a POV edit or silly nonsense vandalism. —]❤]☮]☺]☯ 23:12, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

	== History of Morocco ==

	Hi Bokpasa, this is not the Spanish Misplaced Pages. Therefore, the "official" language is English and not Spanish. Can you please write in English, stop editting as an anonymous editor and posting your comments in the talk page of the aforementioned article? Thanks --] (]) 14:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
	:No puedo escribir en español porque ayudaste a que me expulsaran de la española, y te escribo en español para que no haya malentendidos y luego ya se sabe lo que pasa... Además pones que sabes español así que bueno ya sabes, o si quieres te lo traduzco al inglés pero tienes que aceptar mis errores (cosas que a Omar si le aceptas jejej). Por cierto si hubieses leido lo que he puedo he puesto no editaría en 2 días....Bokpasa 14:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

	I don't think you understand what's going on. This is not a conversation between you and me. You've talking about an article editions in the English Misplaced Pages. Therefore you must a) write in English; b) do it in the proper place. That is, the article talk page. As said there, your English language abilities are poor, your editions meaningless most of the times, your style quite far away of the encyclopaedic prose, your sources are not reliable (see ]) and furthermore, you've on the verge of breaking ] many times (in fact you've already done many times). Thus, it's up to you to contribute in a constructive way or returning to projects with lack of policies (and lack of community, or both). --] (]) 14:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

	== Warning ==

	Don't refactor EVER my comments in a talk page. Hope it's clear --] (]) 15:02, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

	: If is a clue of the discussion level you wish to enforce, I don't think going on with the discussion is worthy. --] (]) 08:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:05, 5 January 2012

Please explain your actions

As you did on Marinid dynasty and Almoravid dynasty. You marked major edits as minor (And they are definitely not minor by any means). You have not been discussing your edits, and your edit comment here is borderline on personal attacking. - Penwhale | 10:17, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Bokpassa, if you pull your stunts again, I am going to request a user ban on you. Walrasiad (talk) 18:53, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Almoravid-Almohad-Marinid-Wattasid-Saadi

Exactly what is you disagree with in those articles? --Tachfin (talk) 19:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Río Salado

Could you post an explanation on the talk page of Battle of Rio Salado outlining what issues you have with the article? It helps explain why you have tagged the article as unbalanced. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:46, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Almoravid dynasty, you may be blocked from editing.
You seem to not understand that only one country (the most relevant one) should be in those Category generating fields. per Template:Infobox_former_country/doc#Location See examples Austria-Hungary Austrian Empire German Empire
Tachfin (talk) 23:12, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bokpasa. You have new messages at Ioeth's talk page.
Message added 23:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle) 23:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Your 3RR report about Almoravid dynasty

Hello Bokpasa. I have undone your report, since most of the fields were blank and you didn't say who you were reporting. Please try again if the problem still exists and be sure we can read your report. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 23:53, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokpasa for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Walrasiad (talk) 01:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Blocked for sock puppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokpasa. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Atama頭 17:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bokpasa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Mmm Why am locked out? Because if it is because a person has been found that other user types in the same items that I ... insufficient reason ...

Decline reason:

You are blocked for the reasons explained here: it is confirmed by checkuser that Luciusmaximus (talk) is an account created after you were warned for edit-warring, to make the same disruptive edits. If you create more sockpuppets, or you continue to edit-war about Morocco after your block expires, your next block will be longer, perhaps indefinite. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case

Reblocked

For evading your block per the evidence at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokpasa, I've reset your block to two weeks. Next time it will be much longer. — HelloAnnyong 03:37, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

And for evading yet again per evidence at the same SPI page, you're now indefinitely blocked. — HelloAnnyong 02:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Almohad Empire battles

Template:Campaignbox Almohad Empire battles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 08:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)