Revision as of 12:37, 1 August 2010 editPjacobi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,850 edits And another number of commentators have critized dewiki for it's right wing bias (because of neolib in economics, many burschenschaften articles, etc). This only tells about the commentators.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:36, 14 January 2025 edit undoAwerDiWeGo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,957 editsm →Early history: Minor punctuation correction. | ||
(697 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|German-language edition of Misplaced Pages}} | |||
{{infobox website | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2020}} | |||
| name = {{Wiki favicon}} German Misplaced Pages | |||
{{Update|date=April 2023|reason=Much of the article focuses on the mid-2000s. While there is some recent information, it's by far the minority of the article}} | |||
| logo = ] | |||
{{Infobox website | |||
| screenshot = ] | |||
| name = {{Wiki favicon}} German Misplaced Pages | |||
| collapsible = yes | |||
| logo = ] | |||
| caption = | |||
| screenshot = ] | |||
| url = http://de.wikipedia.org/ | |||
| |
| collapsible = yes | ||
| caption = ] of the German Misplaced Pages (December 2010) | |||
| launch date = 16 March 2001 | |||
| url = {{URL|de.wikipedia.org}} | |||
| type = ] | |||
| commercial = No | |||
| language = ] | |||
| launch_date = {{start date and age|2001|3|16|df=y}} | |||
| type = ] | |||
| language = ] | |||
| registration = Optional | | registration = Optional | ||
| owner |
| owner = ] | ||
| |
| editor = German-language ] | ||
| content_license = {{nobr|] 4.0}} (most text also dual-licensed under ])<br/>Media licensing varies | |||
}} | }} | ||
The '''German Misplaced Pages''' ({{ |
The '''German Misplaced Pages''' ({{langx|de|Deutschsprachige Misplaced Pages|link=no}}) is the ] edition of ], a free and publicly editable ]. | ||
Founded on 16 March 2001, it is the second-oldest Misplaced Pages edition (after the ]). It has {{NUMBEROF|ARTICLES|de|N}} articles, making it the {{Ordinal to word|{{Misplaced Pages rank by size|de}}}}-largest edition of Misplaced Pages by number of articles, {{As of|2024|lc=y}}, behind the English Misplaced Pages and the mostly bot-generated ].<ref name="List1">] Retrieved 5 January 2025.</ref><ref name="JWales01"></nowiki>] Alternative language Wikipedias, 16 March 2001</ref><ref name=":0"> meta.wikimedia.org, Statistics</ref> It has the second-largest number of edits and of active users behind the English Misplaced Pages.<ref name="List1" /> On 7 November 2011, the German Misplaced Pages became the second edition of Misplaced Pages, after the English edition, to exceed 100 million page edits. | |||
== History == | == History == | ||
=== Early history === | |||
The first non-English Misplaced Pages subdomain was the German one, originally named <tt>deutsche.wikipedia.com</tt>. Its creation was announced by ] on 16 March 2001.<ref name="JWales01" /> One of the earliest snapshots of the home page, dated 2001-03-21 (revision #9), can be seen at the ] site.<ref>Internet Archive's snapshots of German Misplaced Pages , 2001-03-21 12:10 (revision #9), and related . Accessed 2008-11-04.</ref> Aside from the home page, creation of articles in the German Misplaced Pages started as early as April 2001, apparently with translations of ] articles.<ref> (2001-04-06), (2001-04-16), (2001-04-17).</ref> The earliest article still available on Misplaced Pages's site is apparently ], dated May 2001.<ref> article on German Wiki showing edit dated May 2001</ref> | |||
The German edition of Misplaced Pages was the first non-English Misplaced Pages subdomain, and was originally named {{mono|deutsche.wikipedia.com}}. Its creation was announced by ] on 16 March 2001.<ref name="JWales01" /> One of the earliest snapshots of the home page, dated 21 March 2001 (revision #9), can be seen at the ] site.<ref>Internet Archive's snapshots of German Misplaced Pages , 21 March 2001 12:10 (revision #9), and related . Retrieved 4 November 2008.</ref> Aside from the home page, creation of articles in the German Misplaced Pages started as early as April 2001, apparently with translations of ] articles.<ref> (6 April 2001), (16 April 2001), (17 April 2001).</ref> After the ], the German Misplaced Pages was the second non-English edition to contain articles. The earliest article still available on Misplaced Pages's site is apparently ], dated May 2001.<ref> article on German Wiki showing edit dated May 2001</ref> | |||
] wrote that the hacker culture in Germany and the {{lang|de|]}} concept solidified the German Misplaced Pages's culture. The geography of Europe facilitated face-to-face meetups among German Wikipedians.<ref>], p. 147.</ref> | |||
== Size, coverage and popularity == | |||
=== Growth, coverage and popularity === | |||
] | |||
{| align="right" | |||
|- | |||
| {{bar box | |||
|title=Origin of page viewers (September 2018)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportPageViewsPerLanguageBreakdown.htm|title = Wikimedia Traffic Analysis Report – Page Views per Misplaced Pages Language – Breakdown}}</ref> | |||
|titlebar=#ddd | |||
|width=300px | |||
|bars= | |||
{{bar percent|{{DEU}}|blue|77.0}} | |||
{{bar percent|{{AUT}}|blue|8.0}} | |||
{{bar percent|{{CHE}}|blue|5.4}} | |||
{{bar percent|{{USA}}|blue|1.3}} | |||
{{bar percent|Other|blue|8.3}} | |||
}} | |||
|} | |||
{| align="right" | |||
{{As of|2009|12|27}} this edition had more than 1,000,000 articles,<ref name="WikiDeStatistics"> of German Misplaced Pages (English)</ref> second only to the ]. The millionth article was about ]. In November 2008, 90% of the articles had more than 512 bytes, 49% had more than 2 KB, and the average article size was 3476 bytes.<ref name="scp"> Accessed 12 April 2009</ref> In the middle of 2009 this edition had nearly 250,000 biographies and in December 2006 more than 48,500 disambiguations.<ref>http://de.wikipedia.org/Spezial:Mostlinked 29 December 2006</ref> | |||
|- | |||
| {{bar box | |||
|title=Origin of page edits (October 2012 – September 2013)<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportPageEditsPerLanguageBreakdown.htm#German |title=Wikimedia Traffic Analysis Report – Page Edits Per Misplaced Pages Language – Breakdown}}</ref> | |||
|titlebar=#ddd | |||
|width=300px | |||
|bars= | |||
{{bar percent|{{DEU}}|Red|83.4}} | |||
{{bar percent|{{AUT}}|Red|7.0}} | |||
{{bar percent|{{CHE}}|Red|4.1}} | |||
{{bar percent|{{ITA}}|Red|0.6}} | |||
{{bar percent|{{USA}}|Red|0.5}} | |||
{{bar percent|Other|Red|4.4}} | |||
}} | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
Compared to the ], the German one tends to be more selective in its coverage,{{Citation needed|date=May 2008}} often rejecting small stubs, articles about fictional characters and similar materials. There are some exceptions to the "cultural" rule; although the ] have been condensed into one article, some characters such as ] have their own pages. <!-- Yet despite its rejection of articles on fictional subjects, the German Misplaced Pages is keeping at least one ]: it has had an entry on the nonexistent insect "]" since January 2003, which was kept after deletion discussions in January 2005<ref></ref> and June 2006<ref></ref><ref></ref>; more recent requests for deletion are no longer even discussed<ref></ref>. However, this article is an exception as it is considered (according to the deletion request discussions) to be comparable to the fictitious entry ] in a German medical encyclopedic dictionary as the German Misplaced Pages's "classic" mascot joke entry. The German Misplaced Pages doesn't usually tolerate fictitious entries. --> | |||
On 27 December 2009, the German Misplaced Pages exceeded 1,000,000 articles,<ref> of German Misplaced Pages (English)</ref> becoming the first edition after the ] to do so. The millionth article was ]. In March 2014, 88% of the edition's articles had more than 512 ]s, 57% had more than 2 ]s, and the average article size was 4,298 bytes.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaDE.htm |title=Misplaced Pages Statistics – Tables – German |website=stats.wikimedia.org |access-date=26 August 2024}}</ref> As of August 2024, the German edition of Misplaced Pages has nearly 950,000 biographies and 350,000 disambiguation pages.<ref>{{cite web |title=Liste der Biografien |url=https://de.wikipedia.org/Liste_der_Biografien |website=German Misplaced Pages |publisher=Wikimedia Foundation |access-date=26 August 2024}}</ref><ref name="disamb">{{cite web |title=Kategorie:Begriffsklärung |url=https://de.wikipedia.org/Kategorie:Begriffsklärung |website=German Misplaced Pages |publisher=Wikimedia Foundation |access-date=26 August 2024}}</ref> | |||
Compared to the English Misplaced Pages, the German edition tends to be more selective in its coverage, often rejecting small stubs, articles about individual fictional characters and similar materials. Instead, there is usually one article about all the characters from a specific fictional setting, usually only when the setting is considered important enough (for example, all ] are listed in a single article). A dedicated article about a single fictional entity generally exists only if the character in question has a very significant impact on popular culture (for example, ]).<ref name="relev" /> Andrew Lih wrote that German Misplaced Pages users believe that "having no article at all is better than a very bad article."<ref name="Lihp148">], p. 148.</ref> Therefore, growth on the German Misplaced Pages leveled before it did for the English Misplaced Pages, with accelerating growth in article count shifting to constant growth in mid-2006. The number of users signing up for accounts began to steadily decline in 2007 through 2008.<ref name="Lihp148" /> | |||
The January 2005, ] announced that "Misplaced Pages" was the #8 most searched query on Google.de. In February 2005 Misplaced Pages reached third place behind Firefox and ]. In June 2005, Misplaced Pages ranked first. | |||
] | |||
== Language and dialects == | |||
] | |||
The number of volunteer authors began to stagnate in 2007 and has decreased since then. In Germany, the number of regularly active authors fell by more than a third from the peak of 9,254 at the beginning of 2008 to 5,862 at the end of 2015.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dobusch |first=Leonhard |title=Warum Misplaced Pages nach 15 Jahren in der Krise steckt |url=https://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/online-lexikon-warum-wikipedia-nach-15-jahren-in-der-krise-steckt-1.2816858 |access-date=2022-01-30 |website=] |date=15 January 2016 |language=de}}</ref> | |||
The January 2005 ] announced that "Misplaced Pages" was the eighth most-searched query on {{mono|www.google.de}}. In February 2005, Misplaced Pages reached third place behind ] and ]. In June 2005, Misplaced Pages ranked first. | |||
] | |||
=== Lack of diversity, decline of authors and paid editing === | |||
Separate Wikipedias have been created for several German dialects, including ] (]), ] (]), ] (]), ] (]), ] (formerly ]; ]), and ] (]). | |||
On the 20th anniversary of Misplaced Pages, the German-language edition faced a number of problems. According to German media the most significant are a lack of diversity, a decline in active users and the influence of paid editing. While in 2006 there were 8,614 active authors in the German Misplaced Pages, in December 2018 there were only 5,262. Active Wikipedians only saw about 300 people as the "hard core" of the German Misplaced Pages who write articles. | |||
As the number of authors decreases, the influence of a few increases, researchers found. The scientist ] describes those authors as "super editors" who write an excessive number of Misplaced Pages articles and thus keep the community project alive. It is problematic when "super editors" dominate much-discussed articles, build up an elite circle among themselves and "defend" their area.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Giessler |first=Denis |date=2021-01-15 |title=Misplaced Pages wird 20 Jahre alt: Ungleich verteiltes Wissen |language=de |work=Die Tageszeitung: taz |url=https://taz.de/!5739248/ |access-date=2023-07-26 |issn=0931-9085}}</ref> | |||
== Characteristics == | |||
German Misplaced Pages has been criticized for ] manipulations by ] who overwhelm a small number of ].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-09-03 |title=Absolut diskret: So entlarvt Böhmermann Misplaced Pages-Manipulationen |url=https://www.br.de/nachrichten/kultur/absolut-diskret-so-entlarvt-boehmermann-wikipedia-manipulationen,Shwtnez |access-date=2022-01-22 |website=BR24 |language=de}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-01-23 |title=Nach Kritik: DFB entschuldigt sich wegen geändertem Misplaced Pages-Artikel |url=https://www.fr.de/sport/fussball/deutscher-fussball-bund-dfb-wikipedia-seite-friedrich-curtius-general-sekretaer-statement-90172530.html |access-date=2022-01-22 |website=www.fr.de |language=de}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Lobe |first=Adrian |date=25 June 2019 |title=Gekaufte Wahrheiten auf Misplaced Pages |url=https://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/wikipedia-werbung-manipulation-schleichwerbung-wissen-1.4496890 |access-date=2022-01-22 |website=Süddeutsche.de |language=de}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
With the withdrawal of users and an interpretation of the rules that is not always perceived as appropriate, German Misplaced Pages can hardly counter the influence of lobby groups and ].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Drosdowski |first=Johannes |date=2022-04-24 |title=Enthüllung über Bundesbehörden: Geweihe und Corona-Boni |language=de |work=Die Tageszeitung: taz |url=https://taz.de/!5846956/ |access-date=2023-07-26 |issn=0931-9085}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-06-09 |title=Misplaced Pages: Handlungsbedarf bei bezahltem Schreiben |url=https://netzpolitik.org/2022/wikipedia-handlungsbedarf-bei-bezahltem-schreiben/ |access-date=2023-07-26 |website=netzpolitik.org |language=de-DE}}</ref> | |||
{{As of|2022|post=,}} the size of the German Misplaced Pages database is about 6 gigabytes.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://de.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Technik/Datenbank/Download&oldid=207346209|title=Misplaced Pages:Technik/Datenbank/Download|date=6 January 2021|via=Misplaced Pages}}</ref> | |||
== Language and varieties of German== | |||
Separate Wikipedias have been created for several other varieties of German, including ] (]), ] (]), ] (]), ] (including ]; ]), ] (]), ] (]) and ] (]). These however, have less popularity than the German Misplaced Pages.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/Sitemap.htm|title=Misplaced Pages Statistics – Site map|website=stats.wikimedia.org}}</ref> There are also the ] (]) and the . | |||
== Characteristics == | |||
] | |||
The German Misplaced Pages is different from the English Misplaced Pages in a number of aspects. | The German Misplaced Pages is different from the English Misplaced Pages in a number of aspects. | ||
* Compared to the English Misplaced Pages, |
* Compared to the English Misplaced Pages, different criteria of ] are expressed through the judgments of the editors for deciding if an article about a topic should be allowed. The criteria for notability are more specific; each field has its own specific guidelines.<ref name="relev">{{cite web |url=http://de.wikipedia.org/search/?oldid=55275214 |title="Relevanzkriterien" (notability guidelines) |access-date=13 January 2009 |date=13 January 2009}}</ref> | ||
* There are no ] provisions. Images and other media that are accepted on the English Misplaced Pages as fair use may not be suitable for the German Misplaced Pages.<ref>{{ |
* There are no ] provisions. Images and other media that are accepted on the English Misplaced Pages as fair use may not be suitable for the German Misplaced Pages.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://de.wikipedia.org/search/?oldid=55164140#Fair_use |title="Bildrechte" (image rights) |access-date=13 January 2009 |date=10 January 2009}}</ref> However, the ] for works of applied art is set much higher, which often allows the use of company logos and similar icons, too. | ||
* The use of scholarly sources, in preference over journalistic and other types of sources, is more strongly encouraged. The German Verifiability (''Belege'') guideline classifies scholarly sources as inherently more reliable than non-academic sources; the latter's use is – in theory at least – only permitted if there is a lack of published academic sources covering a topic.<ref> |
* The use of ] sources, in preference over journalistic and other types of sources, is more strongly encouraged. The German Verifiability (''Belege'') guideline classifies scholarly sources as inherently more reliable than non-academic sources; the latter's use is – in theory at least – only permitted if there is a lack of published academic sources covering a topic.<ref>]</ref> | ||
* In September 2005, ] voiced concern that "long term page protection is used excessively on the German Misplaced Pages"<ref>]: Wikitech-l mailing list, |
* In September 2005, ] voiced concern that "long term page protection is used excessively on the German Misplaced Pages":<ref>]: Wikitech-l mailing list, 14 September 2005</ref> on 14 September 2005, 253 pages had been in a fully protected state (only editable by admins) for more than two weeks. This was the highest total of any of the Wikipedias, with the second-highest being 166 pages in the ] and 138 in the English Misplaced Pages.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://meta.wikimedia.org/Longest_page_protections%2C_September_2005 |title=Longest page protections, September 2005 - Meta |publisher=Meta.wikimedia.org |access-date=20 December 2010}}</ref> {{As of|2008|5}}, the German Misplaced Pages still had the highest percentage of semi-protected articles (articles not editable by unregistered or recently registered users) – 0.281% – among the ten largest Wikipedias, but in terms of the fraction of fully protected articles (0.0261%) it ranked fourth, behind the Japanese, ] and English Wikipedias.<ref>Tim 'avatar' Bartel: WikiDE-l mailing list, 28 May 2008 07:45:55 GMT</ref> | ||
* |
* Handling of vandalism and other abuse is less structured: vandals are sometimes blocked on their first edit and without warning if their edit clearly shows lack of interest for actual encyclopaedic work. This is especially true if added text includes unlawful statements, such as ]. <br />Similarly, the ] function is rarely used to confirm usage of multiple accounts by the same person, as suspicious accounts are often blocked on sight. | ||
* Articles on indisputably notable subjects may be deleted if they are deemed too short. While the requirements for minimal articles (called stubs) are equivalent, the German and the English Misplaced Pages differ greatly in the way they are put into practice.<ref> |
* Articles on indisputably notable subjects may be deleted if they are deemed too short. While the requirements for minimal articles (called stubs) are equivalent, the German and the English Misplaced Pages differ greatly in the way they are put into practice.<ref>], ]{{primary source inline|date=August 2021}}</ref> | ||
* On 28 December 2005 it was decided to eliminate the Category "stub" (and the corresponding template identifying articles as ]) from the German Misplaced Pages.<ref>], 28 December 2005</ref> | * On 28 December 2005, it was decided to eliminate the Category "stub" (and the corresponding template identifying articles as ]) from the German Misplaced Pages.<ref>], 28 December 2005</ref> | ||
* Users do not have to create an account in order to start a new article. | * Users do not have to create an account in order to start a new article. | ||
* Unlike the ], ], ] or many other Wikipedias, the German one does not contain large collections of ]-generated geographical stubs or similar articles. | * Unlike the ], ], ], ], ] or many other Wikipedias, the German one does not contain large collections of ] geographical stubs or similar articles. | ||
* |
* The German Misplaced Pages version did not have an ] until May 2007. Currently, German Misplaced Pages's ] plays only a minor role in Misplaced Pages politics.{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}} | ||
* Categories are |
* Categories are singular and are not differentiated for gender. Categories are usually introduced only for a minimum of ten entries and are not always subdivided even for larger numbers of items, so that current categories often describe only one property (e.g., nationality). Other categories are subdivided, but differently from in the English Misplaced Pages. For example, "chemists" are subdivided by century, not by nationality. University professors, on the other hand, will usually be categorized according to where they teach.{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}} | ||
* The equivalent to the English Misplaced Pages's ] and ] are ] '' |
* The equivalent to the English Misplaced Pages's ] and ] are ] (''excellent articles'') and ] (''good articles''; literally: ''articles'' "''worth reading''"). | ||
* In 2005, there was a discussion and poll resulting in the decision to phase out the use of local image uploads and to exclusively use ] for images and other media in the future.<ref>]</ref> The attempt to implement this lasted for about a year and the German "Upload file" page displayed a large pointer to Commons in this time, but since December 2006, there is again a local image upload page without any pointer to Wikimedia Commons. This was prompted by the deletion of images on Commons that are acceptable according to German Misplaced Pages policies.<ref>]</ref> | * In 2005, there was a discussion and poll resulting in the decision to phase out the use of local image uploads and to exclusively use ] for images and other media in the future.<ref>]</ref> The attempt to implement this lasted for about a year and the German "Upload file" page displayed a large pointer to Commons in this time, but since December 2006, there is again a local image upload page without any pointer to Wikimedia Commons. This was prompted by the deletion of images on Commons that are acceptable according to German Misplaced Pages policies.<ref>]</ref> | ||
* Starting in December 2004, German Wikipedians pioneered |
* Starting in December 2004, German Wikipedians pioneered Persondata ("Personendaten"), a special format for ] about persons (name, birth date and place, etc.), introduced in the English Misplaced Pages in December 2005. In the beginning, the main aim of this system was to aid the search features of the DVD edition of the German Misplaced Pages (see below). During its introduction in January 2005, ''Personendaten'' were added to some 30,000 biographical articles on the live Misplaced Pages, partly aided by a somewhat automatic tool. The template is currently deprecated and is no longer on any pages.<ref>Jakob Voss: ] (presentation at ])</ref> | ||
* Like |
* Like '']'' in the English Misplaced Pages, the German Misplaced Pages also has its own internal newspaper, the '']''. However, the ''Kurier'' is laid out on a single page and is not issued weekly but is continually updated by interested Wikipedians, with older articles being archived. | ||
* In German "Misplaced Pages" is pronounced ]]. | |||
* ] is a page where users can offer various rewards for completion of Misplaced Pages-related tasks. Started in July 2005, the idea initially met with some resistance, similar to the recently proposed ] in the English Misplaced Pages. | |||
=== Reviewed versions === | === Reviewed versions === | ||
At ], ] announced that the German Misplaced Pages would |
At ], ] announced that the German Misplaced Pages would institute a system of "]", also known as sighting, on a trial basis. The system went live in May 2008. Certain users, so-called "''active sighters''", are now able to mark article versions as "reviewed", indicating that the text contains no obvious vandalism. A note in the top right corner of the screen indicates to the reader whether or not the present version of an article has already been reviewed, and provides access to the most recent reviewed version or a more current, unreviewed version as needed. | ||
The German Misplaced Pages has two levels of ''sighting'' status which act like the ]'s ]: ''Passive sighter'' and ''Active sighter''. The former is able to make changes to articles go live immediately if the last edit is marked as sighted, while only the latter allows manually reviewing pending changes. | |||
== Miscellanea == | == Miscellanea == | ||
] library, March 2006]] | |||
===Events === | |||
The first real-life meetup of Wikipedians took place in October 2003 in ]. As a result of this meeting, regularly striking round tables (called "Misplaced Pages-Stammtisch") established themselves at various places in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The round tables have become an important aspect of collegial exchange within the German-speaking community.<ref>]</ref> | |||
Each spring and autumn, the German Misplaced Pages organizes a writing contest, where a community-elected jury rates nominated articles. Prizes are sponsored by individual community members and companies. The first contest was held in October 2004 – the article ] (Lehnin Abbey) was selected as the winner from 44 nominated articles. The second contest, held in March 2005, saw 52 contributions, and the third, in September 2005, 70. A trial to extend the contest to an international level met with limited success, with only the Dutch, English and Japanese Wikipedias participating.<ref>], March 2005.</ref> | |||
] library, March 2006]] | |||
For the March 2006 writing contest, the 150 nominated articles were split into three sections: history and society (56 nominations), arts and humanities (36), and science (46). The article on the ] (German: ''Braunbär'') won, and of the nominated 27 articles reached featured status a few weeks after the contest.<ref>] {{in lang|de}}</ref> In March 2007, the sixth contest was held, with the winner being the article on the ] (German: ''Haager Konvention zum Schutz von Kulturgut bei bewaffneten Konflikten''). | |||
=== Events === | |||
German Wikipedians organized the first international Misplaced Pages conference, ], in August 2005 in ]. Some 300 people from over 50 countries attended the three-day conference. | |||
The first real-life ] of Wikipedians took place in October 2003 in ]. | |||
From 17 March to 15 April 2006, the ] held a special exhibition documenting the first five years of Misplaced Pages.<ref>], ]</ref> | |||
Each spring and autumn the German Misplaced Pages organizes a writing contest where a community elected jury rates nominated articles. Prizes are sponsored by individual community members and companies. The first contest was held in October 2004, among the 44 nominations the article ] (Lehnin Abbey) won. The second contest in March saw 52 contributions, the third in September 2005 already 70. A trial to extend the contest to an international level met with limited success, only the Dutch, English and Japanese Wikipedias participated in the end<ref>, March 2005.</ref> | |||
For the writing contest in March 2006 the 150 nominations were split in three sections, history & society (56 nominations), arts & humanities (36) and science (46). The article on the ] (Brown Bear) won, 27 articles reached featured status a few weeks after the contest.<ref>] {{de icon}}</ref> In March 2007 there was the 6th edition with the winning article ] (]). | |||
In 2006, the ] hosted the first ]. The academy was intended to familiarize the academic world with Wikimedia projects. In 2007, the second such meeting took place, organized in conjunction with the ] (''Academy of Science and Literature'') in ] as part of the German ] (''Year of the ]''), which was decreed by the German ]. A third meeting was organized on 20–21 June 2008 in ], during the Jahr der Mathematik (''Year of Mathematics''); the meeting was hosted by the ].<ref>Misplaced Pages Academy {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060413202404/http://www.wikipedia-academy.de/ |date=13 April 2006}} {{in lang|de}}</ref> | |||
German Wikipedians organized the first international Misplaced Pages conference, ''] 2005'', in August 2005 in ]. Some 300 people from over 50 countries attended the three-day conference. | |||
German Wikipedians have since organised the ], with participants from 10 countries. | |||
From 17 March to 15 April 2006, the ] held a special exhibition documenting the first 5 years of Misplaced Pages.<ref>], ]</ref> | |||
=== Contacts with ''Brockhaus'' === | |||
In 2006 at the ] the first ] was held. The Academy is intended to familiarize the academic world with Wikimedia projects. In 2007 the second meeting took place. This year the event was organized in conjunction with the ] (Academy of Science and Literature) in ] and was a part of the German ] (Year of the ]), organized by the German ]. The event had a remarkable impact on German scholars' view of Misplaced Pages and its sister projects in general.{{Citation needed|date=May 2008}} A third meeting was organized on 20–21 June 2008 in ]. Partner in the "Jahr der Mathematik" (Year of Mathematiks) was the ].<ref>Misplaced Pages Academy {{de icon}}</ref>. | |||
In April 2004, a complete list of article titles from the leading German encyclopedia '']'' was uploaded to the German Misplaced Pages, in an apparent attempt to facilitate the creation of still missing articles. A representative of ''Brockhaus'' asked for and obtained the deletion of what was believed to be a copyright infringement. As a result of the developing email conversation, a group of five Wikipedians visited the "new media" group of ''Brockhaus'' in ] on 1 July 2004.<ref>Report: ]</ref> The friendly meeting saw a lively discussion of the differing approaches to writing an encyclopedia; it became clear that ''Brockhaus'' had closely observed Misplaced Pages for quite some time. | |||
The German Wikipedians have organized since 2007 some with participants from 10 countries. | |||
=== |
=== Subsidies from the German government === | ||
In June 2007, a project on ]s (]) was initiated,<ref>nova-Institut (26 June 2007): {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080203214012/http://www.nachwachsende-rohstoffe.info/nachricht.php?id=20070626-02 |date=3 February 2008}} Press release. Retrieved 24 October 2007.</ref><ref>Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (FNR) e. V.{{Dead link|date=March 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}. Retrieved 24 October 2007.</ref> the goal being to write and improve articles on the topic. The project was run for three years and was subsidized by the ] with approximately €80,000 a year. It was organised and managed by the private company "nova-Institut GmbH". Nova GmbH and Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. funded the project with approximately €60,000 a year in addition, so the budget was approximately €420,000 in total.{{citation needed|date=December 2010}} | |||
In April 2004, a complete list of article titles from the leading German encyclopedia '']'' was uploaded to the German Misplaced Pages, in an apparent attempt to facilitate the creation of still missing articles. A representative of ''Brockhaus'' asked for and obtained the deletion of what was believed to be a copyright infringement. As a result of the developing email conversation, a group of five Wikipedians visited the "new media" group of ''Brockhaus'' in ] on 1 July 2004.<ref>Report: </ref> The friendly meeting saw a lively discussion of the differing approaches to writing an encyclopedia; it became clear that ''Brockhaus'' had closely observed Misplaced Pages for quite some time. | |||
=== Article-free Sunday === | |||
On 23 November 2006, the number of articles at German Misplaced Pages reached 500,000. As a response to this and to the perception that quality control was not keeping up with article creation, it was proposed to declare 10 December 2006 "]", a day where participants voluntarily agree to post no new articles, but instead focus on improving existing ones. It was also proposed to declare 10 December "]", a day where participants create missing articles and improve existing ones. | |||
=== Subsidies from the German government === | |||
These funds were mainly used to organise the project and also to search for experts in the field who have not contributed to Misplaced Pages yet. Nova may also have paid expense allowances to authors.<ref>nova-Institut: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081002214338/http://www.nova-institut.de/wikipedia/ |date=2 October 2008}} Project page. Retrieved 31 July 2008.</ref> | |||
In June 2007, a project on ]s (]) was initiated,<ref>nova-Institut (2007-06-26): Press release. Accessed online 2007-10-24.</ref><ref>Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (FNR) e. V.. Accessed online 2007-10-24.</ref> the goal being to write and improve articles on the topic. The project will run for three years and is subsidized by the ] with approximately €80,000 a year. It is organised and managed by the private company "nova-Institut GmbH". Nova GmbH and Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. fund the project with approximately €60,000 a year in addition, so the budget is approximately €420,000 in total. | |||
=== Most-disputed articles === | |||
These funds are mainly used to organise the project and also to search for experts in the field who have not contributed to Misplaced Pages yet. Nova may also pay expense allowances to authors.<ref>nova-Institut: Project page. Accessed online 2008-07-31.</ref> | |||
] | |||
According to a 2013 ] study, the article on ] was the most disputed article on the German Misplaced Pages. The top ten most disputed articles then also included ], ], and ].<ref>Gross, Doug. "." () '']''. 24 July 2013. Retrieved on 26 July 2013.</ref> One of the largest disputes about simple sentences, however, concerned the ] in Vienna.<ref name="spi" /> Whilst the observation tower shares some architectural aspects with the ], it was never planned for TV broadcasting purposes. The German Misplaced Pages had a rather lengthy (about 600,000 characters) discussion about the suitable title and categories, inasmuch as numerous Austrian authors denied the description of Donauturm as a "TV tower".<ref name="spi">, Mathieu von Rohr</ref> The '']'' coverage of the issue cited a participant with "On good days, Misplaced Pages is better than any TV soap".<ref name="spi" /> | |||
== Reviews and research == | == Reviews and research == | ||
In September 2004, the computer magazine '']'' compared the German Misplaced Pages with the ] and the German edition of ]'s '']''. On a scale from 0 to 5, Misplaced Pages ranked first with a score of 3.4.<ref> 4 October 2004</ref> A few weeks later, the weekly newspaper {{Lang|de|]}} also compared content from Misplaced Pages with other reference works and found that Misplaced Pages only has to "share its lead position in the field of natural science."<ref name="Zeit04">{{Cite web |last=Schult |first=Thomas J. |date=2004-10-14 |title=Lernen vom Schinken in Scheiben |url=https://www.zeit.de/2004/43/C-Enzyklop_8adien-Test |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240829154708/https://www.zeit.de/2004/43/C-Enzyklop_8adien-Test/komplettansicht |archive-date=2024-08-29 |access-date=2024-08-29 |website=] |language=de}}</ref> The DVD version of Spring 2005 received a rather negative review by Björn Hoffmann – product manager working for the ] in July 2005.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hoffmann |first=Björn |date=2005-07-07 |title=Rezension zu: Directmedia Publishing (Hrsg.): Misplaced Pages Frühjahr 2005. Die freie Enzyklopädie |trans-title=Review of: Directmedia Publishing, Misplaced Pages Frühjahr 2005: Die freie Enzyklopädie |url=http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berlin.de/rezensionen/2005-3-017 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/EI1uc/again?url=http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berlin.de/rezensionen/2005-3-017 |archive-date=2013-01-05 |access-date=2024-08-30 |website=] |language=de}}</ref> | |||
In November 2005 the OpenUsability project in cooperation with the Berlin-based Relevantive AG conducted a usability test of the German Misplaced Pages.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060506043331/http://openusability.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=703 |date=6 May 2006}} November 2005</ref> The study focused on finding information and included a set of recommendations to change the MediaWiki interface. In February 2006, the open usability project led a second test which focused on the experience of new editors.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060429004553/http://openusability.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=820 |date=29 April 2006}}, 7 March 2006</ref> The reports were published in English. | |||
In September 2004, the respected computer magazine '']'' compared the German Misplaced Pages with the ] and the German edition of ]'s ]. On a scale from 0 to 5, Misplaced Pages 'won' with a total score of 3.4.<ref> October 4, 2004</ref> | |||
A second test by ''c't'' in February 2007 used 150 search terms, of which 56 were closely evaluated, to compare four digital encyclopedias: ] Enzyklopädie 2007, Brockhaus Multimedial premium 2007, Encarta 2007 Enzyklopädie and Misplaced Pages. With respect to concerns about the ], it concluded: "We did not find more errors in the texts of the 💕 than in those of its commercial competitors".<ref>Dorothee Wiegand: "Entdeckungsreise. Digitale Enzyklopädien erklären die Welt". c't 6/2007, 5 March 2007, p. 136-145. Original quote: "Wir haben in den Texten der freien Enzyklopädie nicht mehr Fehler gefunden als in denen der kommerziellen Konkurrenz"</ref> | |||
A few weeks later, the weekly newspaper '']'' also compared content from Misplaced Pages with other reference works and found that Misplaced Pages only has to "share its lead position in the field of natural science." | |||
In December 2007, German magazine '']'' published the results of a comparison between the German Misplaced Pages and the online version of the 15-volume edition of '']''. The test was commissioned to a research institute (Cologne-based WIND GmbH), whose analysts assessed 50 articles from each encyclopedia (covering politics, business, sports, science, culture, entertainment, geography, medicine, history and religion) on four criteria (accuracy, completeness, timeliness and clarity), and judged Misplaced Pages articles to be more accurate on average (1.6 on a scale from 1 to 6, versus 2.3 for ''Brockhaus'' with lower = better). Misplaced Pages's coverage was also found to be more complete and up to date; however, ''Brockhaus'' was judged to be more clearly written, while several Misplaced Pages articles were criticized as being too complicated for non-experts, and many as too lengthy.<!--"Einige Misplaced Pages-Artikel sind für Laien schlicht zu kompliziert, viele zu weitschweifig, urteilten die Tester."--><ref>''Misplaced Pages: Wissen für alle''. Stern 50/2007, 6 December 2007, pp. 30-44</ref><ref>'''' Stern online, 5 December 2007 (summary of the test, German)</ref><ref>K.C. Jones: '' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071212231601/http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=204702694 |date=12 December 2007}}''. ], 7 December 2007 <!--Note: This article incorrectly reports that Misplaced Pages articles were "judged ... more ... easy to read", in fact this was the one of the four areas where ''Brockhaus'' reached a better result (1.8 vs. 2.4 for Misplaced Pages) --></ref> | |||
The DVD version of Spring 2005 received a rather negative review by Björn Hoffmann — product manager working for the ] in July 2005. | |||
In 2015, a group of young historians reviewed the ] article, which was deemed "excellent" by Misplaced Pages authors. They pointed out more than 130 factual errors and remarked that the article completely ignores the new scientific literature.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Urban|first=Thomas|title=Misplaced Pages: Über hundert Fehler, super!|url=https://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/wikipedia-ueber-hundert-fehler-super-1.2784114|access-date=2022-01-22|website=Süddeutsche.de|date=16 December 2015 |language=de}}</ref> | |||
In November 2005 the OpenUsability project in cooperation with the Berlin based "Relevantive AG" conducted a usability test of the German Misplaced Pages.<ref> November 2005</ref> The study focused on finding information and included a set of recommendations to change the MediaWiki interface. In February 2006 the open usability project led a second test which focused on the experience of new editors.<ref>, 7 March 2006</ref> The reports were published in English. | |||
A second test by c't in February 2007 used 150 search terms, of which 56 were closely evaluated, to compare four digital encyclopedias: ] Enzyklopädie 2007, Brockhaus Multimedial premium 2007, Encarta 2007 Enzyklopädie and Misplaced Pages. With respect to concerns about the ], it concluded: "We did not find more errors in the texts of the 💕 than in those of its commercial competitors".<ref>Dorothee Wiegand: "Entdeckungsreise. Digitale Enzyklopädien erklären die Welt". c't 6/2007, March 5, 2007, p. 136-145. Original quote: "Wir haben in den Texten der freien Enzyklopädie nicht mehr Fehler gefunden als in denen der kommerziellen Konkurrenz"</ref> | |||
In December 2007, German magazine '']'' published the results of a comparison between the German Misplaced Pages and the online version of the 15-volume edition of '']''. The test was commissioned to a research institute (Cologne-based ''WIND GmbH''), whose analysts assessed 50 articles from each encyclopedia (covering politics, business, sports, science, culture, entertainment, geography, medicine, history and religion) on four criteria (accuracy, completeness, timeliness and clarity), and judged Misplaced Pages articles to be more accurate on the average (1.6 on a scale from 1 to 6, versus 2.3 for Brockhaus with lower = better). Misplaced Pages's coverage was also found to be more complete and up to date, however Brockhaus was judged to be more clearly written, while several Misplaced Pages articles were criticized as being too complicated for non-experts, and many as too lengthy.<!--"Einige Misplaced Pages-Artikel sind für Laien schlicht zu kompliziert, viele zu weitschweifig, urteilten die Tester."--><ref>''Misplaced Pages: Wissen für alle''. Stern 50/2007, December 6, 2007, pp. 30-44</ref><ref>'''' Stern online, December 5, 2007 (summary of the test, German)</ref><ref>K.C. Jones: ''''. ], December 7, 2007 <!--Note: This article incorrectly reports that Misplaced Pages articles were "judged ... more ... easy to read", in fact this was the one of the four areas where Brockhaus reached a better result (1.8 vs. 2.4 for Misplaced Pages) --></ref> | |||
== Off-line publication == | == Off-line publication == | ||
=== CD November 2004 === | === CD November 2004 === | ||
In November 2004, ] started distributing a CD-ROM containing a German Misplaced Pages snapshot. Some 40,000 ]s were sent to registered customers of directmedia. The price was 3 ] per CD.<ref name="Zeit04"/> | |||
The display and search software used for the project, ''Digibib'', had been developed by Directmedia Publishing for earlier publications; it ran on ] and ] (and later also on ]). The Misplaced Pages articles had to be converted to the ] format used by ''Digibib''.<ref name="cd2004">{{cite web |title=Publikationen/CD 2004 |url=https://de.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Archiv/Publikationen/CD_2004 |website=German Misplaced Pages |publisher=Wikimedia Foundation |access-date=September 5, 2024}}</ref> | |||
{{Unreferenced section|date=September 2008}} | |||
To produce the CD, a dump of the live Misplaced Pages had been copied to a separate server, where a team of 70 Wikipedians vetted the material, deleting nonsense articles and obvious copyright violations. Questionable articles were added to a special list, to be reviewed later. The final CD contained 132,000 articles and 1,200 images.<ref name="cd2004"/><ref>{{Cite web |last=Kleinz |first=Torsten |date=2004-10-14 |title=Misplaced Pages-CD zum Download |url=https://www.heise.de/news/Wikipedia-CD-zum-Download-108790.html |access-date=2024-09-05 |website=heise online |language=de}}</ref> | |||
In November 2004, ] started distributing a CD-ROM containing a German Misplaced Pages snapshot. Some 40,000 ]s were sent to registered customers of directmedia. The price was 3 ] per CD. | |||
The ] was distributed for free via ] and ]. In December, the ] placed the Misplaced Pages data on the ] that it distributes with every issue. The Misplaced Pages materials are published under ] while the ''Digibib'' software may only be copied for non-commercial use, except the Linux version which is ]. | |||
The display and search software used for the project, ''Digibib'', had been developed by Directmedia Publishing for earlier publications; it ran on ] and ] (and now also on ]). The Misplaced Pages articles had to be converted to the ] format used by ''Digibib''. | |||
To produce the CD, a dump of the live Misplaced Pages had been copied to a separate server, where a team of 70 Wikipedians vetted the material, deleting nonsense articles and obvious copyright violations. Questionable articles were added to a special list, to be reviewed later. The final CD contained 132,000 articles and 1,200 images. | |||
The ] was distributed for free via ] and ]. In December, the ] placed the Misplaced Pages data on the ] that it distributes with every issue. | |||
The Misplaced Pages materials are published under ] while the ''Digibib'' software may only be copied for non-commercial use, except the Linux version which is ]. | |||
=== CD/DVD April 2005 === | === CD/DVD April 2005 === | ||
{{Unreferenced section|date=September 2008}} | {{Unreferenced section|date=September 2008}} | ||
] | |||
A new release of Misplaced Pages content was published by Directmedia on 6 April 2005. This package consisted of a 2.7 GB DVD and a separate bootable CDROM (running a version of Linux with Firefox). The CDROM did not contain all the data, but was included to accommodate users without DVD-drives. The DVD used Directmedia's ''Digibib'' software and article format; everything could be installed to a hard drive. In addition, the DVD contained an HTML tree, as well as Misplaced Pages articles formatted for use with ]s (specifically, the ] and ] formats). | |||
] | |||
A new release of Misplaced Pages content was published by Directmedia on 6 April 2005. This package consisted of a 2.7 GB DVD and a separate bootable CDROM (running a version of Linux with Firefox). The CDROM did not contain all the data, but was included to accommodate users without DVD-drives. The DVD used Directmedia's ''Digibib'' software and article format; everything could be installed to a hard drive. In addition, the DVD contained an HTML tree, as well as Misplaced Pages articles formatted for use with ]s (specifically, the ] and ] formats). | |||
The production of the DVD motivated the ''Personendaten'' project (see above). | The production of the DVD motivated the ''Personendaten'' project (see above). | ||
The vetting process was similar to the one for the CD described above and took place on a separate MediaWiki server. The process took about a week and involved 33 Wikipedians, communicating on ]. To prevent duplication of work, editors would protect every article that they had reviewed; links to protected articles were shown in green. Lists of potential spammed or vandalized articles had been produced ahead of time with SQL queries. Unacceptable articles were simply deleted on the spot. While the XML articles for the earlier CD version had been produced from HTML, this time a script was used to convert Wiki markup directly to the ''Digibib'' format. The final DVD contained about 205,000 |
The vetting process was similar to the one for the CD described above and took place on a separate MediaWiki server. The process took about a week and involved 33 Wikipedians, communicating on ]. To prevent duplication of work, editors would protect every article that they had reviewed; links to protected articles were shown in green. Lists of potential spammed or vandalized articles had been produced ahead of time with SQL queries. Unacceptable articles were simply deleted on the spot. While the XML articles for the earlier CD version had been produced from HTML, this time a script was used to convert Wiki markup directly to the ''Digibib'' format. The final DVD contained about 205,000 articles, with every article linking to a list of contributors. | ||
Directmedia sold 30,000 DVDs, at €9.90 each. This price included 16% taxes and a one-euro donation to ''Wikimedia Deutschland''; production costs were about €2. | Directmedia sold 30,000 DVDs, at €9.90 each. This price included 16% taxes and a one-euro donation to ''Wikimedia Deutschland''; production costs were about €2. | ||
The DVD image can also be downloaded for free. | The DVD image can also be downloaded for free. | ||
Following the successful launch of the DVD, Directmedia donated high-resolution pictures of 10,000 public domain paintings to ] (see ]). | Following the successful launch of the DVD, Directmedia donated high-resolution pictures of 10,000 public domain paintings to ] (see ]). | ||
=== DVD/book December 2005 === | === DVD/book December 2005 === | ||
] | ] | ||
The next edition of Misplaced Pages content was issued in December 2005 by the publisher Zenodot Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, a sister company of Directmedia. A 139 |
The next edition of Misplaced Pages content was issued in December 2005 by the publisher Zenodot Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, a sister company of Directmedia. A 139-page book explaining Misplaced Pages, its history and policies was accompanied by a 7.5 GB DVD containing 300,000 articles and 100,000 images. The book with DVD is sold for €9.90; both are also available for free download.<ref>Torsten Kleinz (9 December 2005). . Heise newsticker {{in lang|de}}.</ref> | ||
The vetting process for this version was different and did not involve human intervention. A "]" of trusted Wikipedians was assembled, the last 10 |
The vetting process for this version was different and did not involve human intervention. A "]" of trusted Wikipedians was assembled, the last 10 days of every article's history were examined, and the last version edited by a white-listed Wikipedian was chosen for the DVD. If no such version existed, the last version older than 10 days was used. Articles nominated for cleanup or deletion were not used. | ||
=== DVD December 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 === | === DVD December 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 === | ||
The December |
The December 2006–2007 and 2007–2008 edition can be downloaded from {{mono|dvd.wikimedia.org}}. | ||
=== Books === | === Books === | ||
==== Wikipress series ==== | ==== Wikipress series ==== | ||
The December 2005 book about Misplaced Pages was the first in a series titled ''Wikipress''. These books, published by |
The December 2005 book about Misplaced Pages was the first in a series titled ''Wikipress''. These books, published by Zenodot, consisted of a collection of Misplaced Pages articles about a common topic, selected and edited by so-called "Wikipeditors" who may receive compensation from Directmedia. The books were assembled on a separate server from those used for the regular German Misplaced Pages pages. Every ''Wikipress'' book was accompanied by an "edit card", a post card that readers could send in to edit the book's contents. ''Wikipress'' books about the ], ]s, ], the ], and ], amongst others, were released, and other books on topics as diverse as ], ], ], ], and the ] were in the works.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wikipress.de |title=Hauptseite |language=de |publisher=Wikipress.de |access-date=20 December 2010}}</ref> Due to lack of interest, the project was ended after a few books.{{Citation needed|date=April 2008}} | ||
==== 100 volume Misplaced Pages ==== | ==== 100 volume Misplaced Pages ==== | ||
The publisher Zenodot announced in January 2006 that they intend to publish the complete German Misplaced Pages in print, 100 |
The publisher Zenodot announced in January 2006 that they intend to publish the complete German Misplaced Pages in print, 100 volumes with 800 pages each, starting with the letter A in October 2006, followed by two volumes each month thereafter, to end with Z in 2010. The project, code named WP 1.0, was to be supported by 25 editors employed by Zenodot as well as a scientific advisory board. Changes made to articles before publication would also be available for incorporation into the online Misplaced Pages. | ||
In March 2006, Zenodot organized a "community day" to meet with Wikipedians and discuss the project. Groups of Wikipedians had already begun to polish articles with titles Aa-Af in selected topics. In late March it was announced that the project was put on hold and no books would be published in 2006; the reason given was that community support was lacking.<ref>Heise newsticker: , 24 March 2006 {{ |
In March 2006, Zenodot organized a "community day" to meet with Wikipedians and discuss the project. Groups of Wikipedians had already begun to polish articles with titles Aa-Af in selected topics. In late March it was announced that the project was put on hold and no books would be published in 2006; the reason given was that community support was lacking.<ref>Heise newsticker: , 24 March 2006 {{in lang|de}}</ref> | ||
==== |
====Bertelsmann==== | ||
On 22 April 2008, the publisher ] announced that it planned to publish a one-volume encyclopedia in September using content from the German-language Misplaced Pages. The volume was planned to include abbreviated entries for the 50,000 most commonly used search terms of the prior two years. The book is priced at 19.95 euros, with one euro from every sale going to the German chapter of the ].<ref>, ], 23 April 2008</ref> It was released on 15 September 2008 in hardcover, containing 992 pages and many illustrations. | |||
On 23 April 2008, the publisher ] announced that it planned to publish a one-volume encyclopedia in September using content from the German-language Misplaced Pages. The volume was planned to include abbreviated entries for the 50,000 most commonly used search terms of the prior two years. The book is priced at 19.95 euros, with one euro from every sale going to the German chapter of the ].<ref>, ], 23 April 2008</ref> It was released on 15 September 2008 in hardcover, containing 992 pages and many illustrations.<ref> ISBN 3-577-09102-9</ref> | |||
== Legal issues and controversies == | == Legal issues and controversies == | ||
=== Deletions === | |||
] | |||
The German Misplaced Pages has been criticized for the deletion of articles because they seem "irrelevant" to those who deleted them, even though they seem expedient, meaningful, well written and extensive enough to other people. These discussions have received press coverage in computer magazines as well as in mainstream media.<ref> 10 April 2007</ref><ref> in ] computer magazine 30 October 2009</ref><ref> 19 October 2009</ref><ref> 27 December 2009</ref><ref> on the news portal of ] (biggest ISP in Germany) 16 July 2010</ref> | |||
=== Unauthorized uses === | === Unauthorized uses === | ||
While everyone is free to use Misplaced Pages content, there are certain conditions, such as attribution, a copy of the license text and no non-free ]s (see ] and ] for details). | |||
In March 2005, the German news magazine '']'' published an article on the ] in its online edition; it was a copy of Misplaced Pages's article. The article was taken down soon after and replaced with an apology.<ref> 9 March 2005</ref> | |||
While everyone is free to use Misplaced Pages content, there are certain conditions, such as attribution, a copy of the license text and no non-free ]s (see ] for details). | |||
In |
In April 2005, the encyclopedia ''Brockhaus'' published an article about the new pope ] in its online edition. Because of its close similarity to Misplaced Pages's article, suspicion arose right away that the ''Brockhaus'' article might have been plagiarism. The article was removed soon after but ''Brockhaus'' did not apologize or admit guilt (see '']''{{'s}} {{srlink|Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2005-05-09/Brockhaus plagiarism suspected|coverage}}). | ||
In April 2005, the encyclopedia ''Brockhaus'' published an article about the new pope ] in its online edition. Because of its close similarity to Misplaced Pages's article, suspicion arose right away that the ''Brockhaus'' article might have been plagiarism. The article was removed soon after but ''Brockhaus'' did not apologize or admit guilt (see the ]'s ].) | |||
=== Large-scale copyright infringement (2003–2005) === | === Large-scale copyright infringement (2003–2005) === | ||
In mid-November 2005, it was discovered that an anonymous user had entered hundreds of articles from older encyclopedias that had been published |
In mid-November 2005, it was discovered that an anonymous user had entered hundreds of articles from older encyclopedias that had been published from the 1960s to the 1980s in ]. The articles were mainly on topics in philosophy and related areas. The user had started in December 2003. | ||
A press release was issued and numerous editors started to remove the copyright protected materials. This was made difficult by the fact that the old encyclopedias were not online and not easily available from many West German libraries, and that the user had used numerous different IP addresses. The Directmedia DVD had to be updated.<ref>]</ref> | A press release was issued and numerous editors started to remove the copyright protected materials. This was made difficult by the fact that the old encyclopedias were not online and not easily available from many West German libraries, and that the user had used numerous different IP addresses. The Directmedia DVD had to be updated.<ref>]</ref> | ||
Line 184: | Line 225: | ||
=== Bertrand Meyer article hoax === | === Bertrand Meyer article hoax === | ||
On 28 December 2005, the article |
On 28 December 2005, the article about ] ] (creator of the ]) was edited by an anonymous user, falsely reporting that Meyer had died four days earlier. The hoax was reported five days later by the ] and the article was immediately corrected. Major news media in Germany and Switzerland picked up on the story. Meyer himself went on to publish a positive evaluation of Misplaced Pages, concluding, "The system succumbed to one of its potential flaws, and quickly healed itself. This doesn't affect the big picture. Just like those about me, rumors about Misplaced Pages's downfall have been grossly exaggerated."<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060322022226/http://www.eiffel.com/general/monthly_column/2006/January.html |date=22 March 2006}}, by Bertrand Meyer, January 2006</ref> | ||
</ref> | |||
=== Naming Tron === | === Naming Tron === | ||
In 2006, Wikimedia Deutschland was drawn into a legal dispute between the parents of the deceased German computer hacker ] and |
In 2006, Wikimedia Deutschland, the German chapter of the US ], was drawn into a legal dispute between the parents of the deceased German computer hacker ] and the Foundation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/0,1518,394374,00.html |title=Spiegel online article (German) |publisher=Spiegel.de |date=10 January 2006 |access-date=20 December 2010}}</ref> The parents did not wish Floricic's real name to be publicly mentioned, and in December 2005 they obtained a preliminary injunction in a ] court against the American ], requiring removal of Floricic's name from Misplaced Pages. The name was not removed. On 19 January 2006 they obtained a second injunction, this time against Wikimedia Deutschland, prohibiting the address <code>www.wikipedia.de</code> (which is under control of Wikimedia Deutschland) to redirect to the German Misplaced Pages at <code>de.wikipedia.org</code> (which is controlled by the Wikimedia Foundation and hosts the actual encyclopedia) as long as Misplaced Pages mentioned Floricic's name. Wikimedia Deutschland complied and replaced the redirect with a note explaining the situation, but without mentioning the Tron case specifically. The German Misplaced Pages remained accessible through <code>de.wikipedia.org</code> during this time. One day later, Wikimedia Deutschland achieved a suspension of the injunction, and linked from the note at <code>www.wikipedia.de</code> to the German Misplaced Pages. On 9 February, the court invalidated the injunction, ruling that neither the rights of the deceased nor the rights of the parents were affected by publishing the name; this ruling was upheld on appeal, decided 12 May. | ||
=== Lutz Heilmann controversy === | === Lutz Heilmann controversy === | ||
In November |
In November 2008, ], a member of the ], obtained a preliminary injunction against Wikimedia Deutschland e. V., forbidding the forwarding of <code>www.wikipedia.de</code> to <code>de.wikipedia.org</code>. According to ], Heilmann objected to claims that he had not completed his university degree, and that he had participated in a business venture involving ]. The report also suggests that the Misplaced Pages article had been repeatedly altered in line with his claims by an anonymous user operating within the ], but Heilmann denied having been involved in an edit war. ] displayed a page explaining the situation. Heilmann announced on 16 November that he would drop the legal proceedings against Wikimedia Deutschland, regretting that many uninvolved users of the encyclopedia had been affected.{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}} | ||
===Superprotect and Media Viewer controversy=== | |||
In 2014, the ] (WMF) "''superprotected''" a JavaScript file on German Misplaced Pages so that no German editors, not even administrators, were allowed to edit it. This was in response towards controversy surrounding the new ] (see '']''{{'s}} {{srlink|Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2014-08-13/News and notes|coverage}}). Many German editors left over this dispute.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.heise.de/news/Wikipedia-Superprotect-Streit-spitzt-sich-zu-2293513.html|title=Misplaced Pages: Superprotect-Streit spitzt sich zu|first=heise|last=online|date=16 August 2014|website=heise online}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.golem.de/sonstiges/zustimmung/auswahl.html?from=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.golem.de%2Fnews%2Fsuperschutz-wikimedia-stiftung-zwingt-deutschen-nutzern-mediaviewer-auf-1408-108522.html|title=Golem.de: IT-News für Profis|website=www.golem.de}}</ref> An open letter to the WMF was signed by almost 1,000 ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Letter_to_Wikimedia_Foundation:_Superprotect_and_Media_Viewer&oldid=15850369|title=Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer|date=19 August 2014|publisher=]|access-date=21 August 2016}}</ref> In April 2015 ] left the WMF; the "''superprotect''" feature was disabled in November.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Superprotect&oldid=15458743|title=Superprotect|date=2015|publisher=]|access-date=21 August 2016}}</ref> | |||
===Reiss Engelhorn Museum=== | |||
In 2015, the ] sued the WMF and its German chapter ] for alleged copyright violations of 17 public domain pictures.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/11/23/lawsuit-public-domain-art/|title=Wikimedia Foundation, Wikimedia Deutschland urge Reiss Engelhorn Museum to reconsider suit over public domain works of art|author1= Michelle Paulson|author2=Geoff Brigham|publisher=]|date=23 November 2015|access-date=21 August 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://hyperallergic.com/259382/museum-sues-wikimedia-for-hosting-copyrighted-photos-of-its-public-domain-artworks/|title=Museum Sues Wikimedia for Hosting Copyrighted Photos of Its Public-Domain Artworks|author=Benjamin Sutton|date=8 December 2015|access-date=21 August 2016|publisher=]}}</ref> | |||
== Parodies and forks == | == Parodies and forks == | ||
In the millennium years, parodies of the German Misplaced Pages include ''Kamelopedia'', created in April 2004, ], created in December 2004, and the German version of ], created in August 2005.<ref>Chip.de: {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120804224847/http://www.chip.de/news/Brockhaus-fuer-Kamele-Misplaced Pages-Parodien_30999849.html |date=4 August 2012}}, 11 March 2008 {{in lang|de}}</ref> | |||
Ulrich Fuchs, a longtime contributor to the German Misplaced Pages, |
Ulrich Fuchs, a longtime contributor to the German Misplaced Pages,<!-- frustrated with what he saw as the lack of quality and the inclusion of un-encyclopedic material, --> produced a fork known as ''Wikiweise'' in April 2005. It was ad-supported, used its own software (but a similar wiki markup), admitted only registered editors, and prominently displayed the real names of every article's major contributors. It has since gone offline. | ||
==Copyright law== | |||
== References == | |||
On 21 March 2019, the German Misplaced Pages went offline to inform users about the ]'s copyright law reformation, the ], which had been voted on in the ] on 27 March 2019. Opponents of the reformation were concerned about the restriction of ] including a free press and the freedom of speech and arts. The blackouts' purpose was to both inform and protest this controversial decision.{{citation needed|date=May 2021}} | |||
{{reflist|2}} | |||
==References== | |||
== External links and sources == | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
== Further reading == | |||
* ]. '']''. ], ]. 2009. First Edition. {{ISBN|978-1-4013-0371-6}} (alkaline paper). | |||
== External links == | |||
{{InterWiki|code=de}} | {{InterWiki|code=de}} | ||
* {{Commons category-inline}} | |||
* |
* {{in lang|de}} | ||
* |
*] | ||
* |
* {{in lang|de}} | ||
* |
*Publication efforts on CD/DVD {{in lang|de}}: | ||
:* |
:*] | ||
:* |
:*] | ||
:* |
:*] | ||
* |
*WP 1.0, publication in book form {{in lang|de}}: | ||
:* |
:*, the project's home page ''(now redirects to zeno.org)'' | ||
:* |
:*], discussion of the project in the German Misplaced Pages | ||
* |
*], a personal history of the German Misplaced Pages, written by one of the core Wikipedians {{in lang|de}} | ||
* |
*], Misplaced Pages Signpost, 6 November 2006 | ||
{{Wikipedias}} | {{Wikipedias}} | ||
{{Wikipedias in Germanic languages}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 21:36, 14 January 2025
German-language edition of Misplaced Pages
This article needs to be updated. The reason given is: Much of the article focuses on the mid-2000s. While there is some recent information, it's by far the minority of the article. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (April 2023) |
[REDACTED] | |
Screenshot Homepage of the German Misplaced Pages (December 2010) | |
Type of site | Internet encyclopedia project |
---|---|
Available in | German |
Owner | Wikimedia Foundation |
Editor | German-language Misplaced Pages community |
URL | de |
Commercial | No |
Registration | Optional |
Launched | 16 March 2001; 23 years ago (2001-03-16) |
Content license | Creative Commons Attribution/ Share-Alike 4.0 (most text also dual-licensed under GFDL) Media licensing varies |
The German Misplaced Pages (German: Deutschsprachige Misplaced Pages) is the German-language edition of Misplaced Pages, a free and publicly editable online encyclopedia.
Founded on 16 March 2001, it is the second-oldest Misplaced Pages edition (after the English Misplaced Pages). It has 2,980,926 articles, making it the third-largest edition of Misplaced Pages by number of articles, as of 2024, behind the English Misplaced Pages and the mostly bot-generated Cebuano Misplaced Pages. It has the second-largest number of edits and of active users behind the English Misplaced Pages. On 7 November 2011, the German Misplaced Pages became the second edition of Misplaced Pages, after the English edition, to exceed 100 million page edits.
History
Early history
The German edition of Misplaced Pages was the first non-English Misplaced Pages subdomain, and was originally named deutsche.wikipedia.com. Its creation was announced by Jimmy Wales on 16 March 2001. One of the earliest snapshots of the home page, dated 21 March 2001 (revision #9), can be seen at the Wayback Machine site. Aside from the home page, creation of articles in the German Misplaced Pages started as early as April 2001, apparently with translations of Nupedia articles. After the Catalan Misplaced Pages, the German Misplaced Pages was the second non-English edition to contain articles. The earliest article still available on Misplaced Pages's site is apparently Polymerase-Kettenreaktion, dated May 2001.
Andrew Lih wrote that the hacker culture in Germany and the Verein concept solidified the German Misplaced Pages's culture. The geography of Europe facilitated face-to-face meetups among German Wikipedians.
Growth, coverage and popularity
|
|
On 27 December 2009, the German Misplaced Pages exceeded 1,000,000 articles, becoming the first edition after the English-language Misplaced Pages to do so. The millionth article was Ernie Wasson. In March 2014, 88% of the edition's articles had more than 512 bytes, 57% had more than 2 kilobytes, and the average article size was 4,298 bytes. As of August 2024, the German edition of Misplaced Pages has nearly 950,000 biographies and 350,000 disambiguation pages.
Compared to the English Misplaced Pages, the German edition tends to be more selective in its coverage, often rejecting small stubs, articles about individual fictional characters and similar materials. Instead, there is usually one article about all the characters from a specific fictional setting, usually only when the setting is considered important enough (for example, all characters from Star Wars are listed in a single article). A dedicated article about a single fictional entity generally exists only if the character in question has a very significant impact on popular culture (for example, Hercule Poirot). Andrew Lih wrote that German Misplaced Pages users believe that "having no article at all is better than a very bad article." Therefore, growth on the German Misplaced Pages leveled before it did for the English Misplaced Pages, with accelerating growth in article count shifting to constant growth in mid-2006. The number of users signing up for accounts began to steadily decline in 2007 through 2008.
The number of volunteer authors began to stagnate in 2007 and has decreased since then. In Germany, the number of regularly active authors fell by more than a third from the peak of 9,254 at the beginning of 2008 to 5,862 at the end of 2015.
The January 2005 Google Zeitgeist announced that "Misplaced Pages" was the eighth most-searched query on www.google.de. In February 2005, Misplaced Pages reached third place behind Firefox and Valentine's Day. In June 2005, Misplaced Pages ranked first.
Lack of diversity, decline of authors and paid editing
On the 20th anniversary of Misplaced Pages, the German-language edition faced a number of problems. According to German media the most significant are a lack of diversity, a decline in active users and the influence of paid editing. While in 2006 there were 8,614 active authors in the German Misplaced Pages, in December 2018 there were only 5,262. Active Wikipedians only saw about 300 people as the "hard core" of the German Misplaced Pages who write articles.
As the number of authors decreases, the influence of a few increases, researchers found. The scientist Taha Yasseri describes those authors as "super editors" who write an excessive number of Misplaced Pages articles and thus keep the community project alive. It is problematic when "super editors" dominate much-discussed articles, build up an elite circle among themselves and "defend" their area.
German Misplaced Pages has been criticized for conflict-of-interest manipulations by paid editors who overwhelm a small number of administrators.
With the withdrawal of users and an interpretation of the rules that is not always perceived as appropriate, German Misplaced Pages can hardly counter the influence of lobby groups and paid editing.
As of 2022, the size of the German Misplaced Pages database is about 6 gigabytes.
Language and varieties of German
Separate Wikipedias have been created for several other varieties of German, including Alemannic German (als:), Luxembourgish (lb:), Pennsylvania German (pdc:), Ripuarian (including Kölsch; ksh:), Yiddish (yi:), Low German (nds:) and Bavarian (bar:). These however, have less popularity than the German Misplaced Pages. There are also the Dutch Low Saxon (nds-nl:) and the Mennonite Low German Misplaced Pages.
Characteristics
The German Misplaced Pages is different from the English Misplaced Pages in a number of aspects.
- Compared to the English Misplaced Pages, different criteria of encyclopedic notability are expressed through the judgments of the editors for deciding if an article about a topic should be allowed. The criteria for notability are more specific; each field has its own specific guidelines.
- There are no fair use provisions. Images and other media that are accepted on the English Misplaced Pages as fair use may not be suitable for the German Misplaced Pages. However, the threshold of originality for works of applied art is set much higher, which often allows the use of company logos and similar icons, too.
- The use of scholarly sources, in preference over journalistic and other types of sources, is more strongly encouraged. The German Verifiability (Belege) guideline classifies scholarly sources as inherently more reliable than non-academic sources; the latter's use is – in theory at least – only permitted if there is a lack of published academic sources covering a topic.
- In September 2005, Erik Möller voiced concern that "long term page protection is used excessively on the German Misplaced Pages": on 14 September 2005, 253 pages had been in a fully protected state (only editable by admins) for more than two weeks. This was the highest total of any of the Wikipedias, with the second-highest being 166 pages in the Japanese Misplaced Pages and 138 in the English Misplaced Pages. As of May 2008, the German Misplaced Pages still had the highest percentage of semi-protected articles (articles not editable by unregistered or recently registered users) – 0.281% – among the ten largest Wikipedias, but in terms of the fraction of fully protected articles (0.0261%) it ranked fourth, behind the Japanese, Portuguese and English Wikipedias.
- Handling of vandalism and other abuse is less structured: vandals are sometimes blocked on their first edit and without warning if their edit clearly shows lack of interest for actual encyclopaedic work. This is especially true if added text includes unlawful statements, such as Holocaust denial.
Similarly, the Checkuser function is rarely used to confirm usage of multiple accounts by the same person, as suspicious accounts are often blocked on sight. - Articles on indisputably notable subjects may be deleted if they are deemed too short. While the requirements for minimal articles (called stubs) are equivalent, the German and the English Misplaced Pages differ greatly in the way they are put into practice.
- On 28 December 2005, it was decided to eliminate the Category "stub" (and the corresponding template identifying articles as stubs) from the German Misplaced Pages.
- Users do not have to create an account in order to start a new article.
- Unlike the Cebuano, Polish, Dutch, Italian, Swedish or many other Wikipedias, the German one does not contain large collections of bot-generated geographical stubs or similar articles.
- The German Misplaced Pages version did not have an Arbitration Committee until May 2007. Currently, German Misplaced Pages's Arbitration Committee plays only a minor role in Misplaced Pages politics.
- Categories are singular and are not differentiated for gender. Categories are usually introduced only for a minimum of ten entries and are not always subdivided even for larger numbers of items, so that current categories often describe only one property (e.g., nationality). Other categories are subdivided, but differently from in the English Misplaced Pages. For example, "chemists" are subdivided by century, not by nationality. University professors, on the other hand, will usually be categorized according to where they teach.
- The equivalent to the English Misplaced Pages's featured articles and good articles are exzellente Artikel (excellent articles) and lesenswerte Artikel (good articles; literally: articles "worth reading").
- In 2005, there was a discussion and poll resulting in the decision to phase out the use of local image uploads and to exclusively use Wikimedia Commons for images and other media in the future. The attempt to implement this lasted for about a year and the German "Upload file" page displayed a large pointer to Commons in this time, but since December 2006, there is again a local image upload page without any pointer to Wikimedia Commons. This was prompted by the deletion of images on Commons that are acceptable according to German Misplaced Pages policies.
- Starting in December 2004, German Wikipedians pioneered Persondata ("Personendaten"), a special format for meta data about persons (name, birth date and place, etc.), introduced in the English Misplaced Pages in December 2005. In the beginning, the main aim of this system was to aid the search features of the DVD edition of the German Misplaced Pages (see below). During its introduction in January 2005, Personendaten were added to some 30,000 biographical articles on the live Misplaced Pages, partly aided by a somewhat automatic tool. The template is currently deprecated and is no longer on any pages.
- Like The Signpost in the English Misplaced Pages, the German Misplaced Pages also has its own internal newspaper, the Kurier. However, the Kurier is laid out on a single page and is not issued weekly but is continually updated by interested Wikipedians, with older articles being archived.
- In German "Misplaced Pages" is pronounced .
Reviewed versions
At Wikimania 2006, Jimmy Wales announced that the German Misplaced Pages would institute a system of "stable article versions", also known as sighting, on a trial basis. The system went live in May 2008. Certain users, so-called "active sighters", are now able to mark article versions as "reviewed", indicating that the text contains no obvious vandalism. A note in the top right corner of the screen indicates to the reader whether or not the present version of an article has already been reviewed, and provides access to the most recent reviewed version or a more current, unreviewed version as needed.
The German Misplaced Pages has two levels of sighting status which act like the English Misplaced Pages's pending changes protection: Passive sighter and Active sighter. The former is able to make changes to articles go live immediately if the last edit is marked as sighted, while only the latter allows manually reviewing pending changes.
Miscellanea
Events
The first real-life meetup of Wikipedians took place in October 2003 in Munich. As a result of this meeting, regularly striking round tables (called "Misplaced Pages-Stammtisch") established themselves at various places in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The round tables have become an important aspect of collegial exchange within the German-speaking community.
Each spring and autumn, the German Misplaced Pages organizes a writing contest, where a community-elected jury rates nominated articles. Prizes are sponsored by individual community members and companies. The first contest was held in October 2004 – the article Kloster Lehnin (Lehnin Abbey) was selected as the winner from 44 nominated articles. The second contest, held in March 2005, saw 52 contributions, and the third, in September 2005, 70. A trial to extend the contest to an international level met with limited success, with only the Dutch, English and Japanese Wikipedias participating.
For the March 2006 writing contest, the 150 nominated articles were split into three sections: history and society (56 nominations), arts and humanities (36), and science (46). The article on the Brown Bear (German: Braunbär) won, and of the nominated 27 articles reached featured status a few weeks after the contest. In March 2007, the sixth contest was held, with the winner being the article on the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (German: Haager Konvention zum Schutz von Kulturgut bei bewaffneten Konflikten).
German Wikipedians organized the first international Misplaced Pages conference, Wikimania 2005, in August 2005 in Frankfurt. Some 300 people from over 50 countries attended the three-day conference.
From 17 March to 15 April 2006, the Göttingen State and University Library held a special exhibition documenting the first five years of Misplaced Pages.
In 2006, the University of Göttingen hosted the first Misplaced Pages Academy. The academy was intended to familiarize the academic world with Wikimedia projects. In 2007, the second such meeting took place, organized in conjunction with the Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur (Academy of Science and Literature) in Mainz as part of the German Jahr der Geisteswissenschaften (Year of the Humanities), which was decreed by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research. A third meeting was organized on 20–21 June 2008 in Berlin, during the Jahr der Mathematik (Year of Mathematics); the meeting was hosted by the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities.
German Wikipedians have since organised the Foto-Workshop meeting of photographers, with participants from 10 countries.
Contacts with Brockhaus
In April 2004, a complete list of article titles from the leading German encyclopedia Brockhaus was uploaded to the German Misplaced Pages, in an apparent attempt to facilitate the creation of still missing articles. A representative of Brockhaus asked for and obtained the deletion of what was believed to be a copyright infringement. As a result of the developing email conversation, a group of five Wikipedians visited the "new media" group of Brockhaus in Mannheim on 1 July 2004. The friendly meeting saw a lively discussion of the differing approaches to writing an encyclopedia; it became clear that Brockhaus had closely observed Misplaced Pages for quite some time.
Subsidies from the German government
In June 2007, a project on renewable resources (WikiProjekt Nachwachsende Rohstoffe) was initiated, the goal being to write and improve articles on the topic. The project was run for three years and was subsidized by the German Ministry of Agriculture with approximately €80,000 a year. It was organised and managed by the private company "nova-Institut GmbH". Nova GmbH and Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. funded the project with approximately €60,000 a year in addition, so the budget was approximately €420,000 in total.
These funds were mainly used to organise the project and also to search for experts in the field who have not contributed to Misplaced Pages yet. Nova may also have paid expense allowances to authors.
Most-disputed articles
According to a 2013 Oxford University study, the article on Croatia was the most disputed article on the German Misplaced Pages. The top ten most disputed articles then also included Adolf Hitler, Scientology, and Rudolf Steiner. One of the largest disputes about simple sentences, however, concerned the Donauturm in Vienna. Whilst the observation tower shares some architectural aspects with the Fernsehturm Stuttgart, it was never planned for TV broadcasting purposes. The German Misplaced Pages had a rather lengthy (about 600,000 characters) discussion about the suitable title and categories, inasmuch as numerous Austrian authors denied the description of Donauturm as a "TV tower". The Spiegel coverage of the issue cited a participant with "On good days, Misplaced Pages is better than any TV soap".
Reviews and research
In September 2004, the computer magazine c't compared the German Misplaced Pages with the Brockhaus Multimedia encyclopedia and the German edition of Microsoft's Encarta. On a scale from 0 to 5, Misplaced Pages ranked first with a score of 3.4. A few weeks later, the weekly newspaper Die Zeit also compared content from Misplaced Pages with other reference works and found that Misplaced Pages only has to "share its lead position in the field of natural science." The DVD version of Spring 2005 received a rather negative review by Björn Hoffmann – product manager working for the Bibliographisches Institut & F.A. Brockhaus in July 2005.
In November 2005 the OpenUsability project in cooperation with the Berlin-based Relevantive AG conducted a usability test of the German Misplaced Pages. The study focused on finding information and included a set of recommendations to change the MediaWiki interface. In February 2006, the open usability project led a second test which focused on the experience of new editors. The reports were published in English.
A second test by c't in February 2007 used 150 search terms, of which 56 were closely evaluated, to compare four digital encyclopedias: Bertelsmann Enzyklopädie 2007, Brockhaus Multimedial premium 2007, Encarta 2007 Enzyklopädie and Misplaced Pages. With respect to concerns about the reliability of Misplaced Pages, it concluded: "We did not find more errors in the texts of the 💕 than in those of its commercial competitors".
In December 2007, German magazine Stern published the results of a comparison between the German Misplaced Pages and the online version of the 15-volume edition of Brockhaus Enzyklopädie. The test was commissioned to a research institute (Cologne-based WIND GmbH), whose analysts assessed 50 articles from each encyclopedia (covering politics, business, sports, science, culture, entertainment, geography, medicine, history and religion) on four criteria (accuracy, completeness, timeliness and clarity), and judged Misplaced Pages articles to be more accurate on average (1.6 on a scale from 1 to 6, versus 2.3 for Brockhaus with lower = better). Misplaced Pages's coverage was also found to be more complete and up to date; however, Brockhaus was judged to be more clearly written, while several Misplaced Pages articles were criticized as being too complicated for non-experts, and many as too lengthy.
In 2015, a group of young historians reviewed the Massaker von Katyn article, which was deemed "excellent" by Misplaced Pages authors. They pointed out more than 130 factual errors and remarked that the article completely ignores the new scientific literature.
Off-line publication
CD November 2004
In November 2004, Directmedia Publishing GmbH started distributing a CD-ROM containing a German Misplaced Pages snapshot. Some 40,000 CDs were sent to registered customers of directmedia. The price was 3 euros per CD.
The display and search software used for the project, Digibib, had been developed by Directmedia Publishing for earlier publications; it ran on Windows and Mac OS X (and later also on Linux). The Misplaced Pages articles had to be converted to the XML format used by Digibib.
To produce the CD, a dump of the live Misplaced Pages had been copied to a separate server, where a team of 70 Wikipedians vetted the material, deleting nonsense articles and obvious copyright violations. Questionable articles were added to a special list, to be reviewed later. The final CD contained 132,000 articles and 1,200 images.
The ISO image was distributed for free via eMule and BitTorrent. In December, the CHIP computer magazine placed the Misplaced Pages data on the DVD that it distributes with every issue. The Misplaced Pages materials are published under GFDL while the Digibib software may only be copied for non-commercial use, except the Linux version which is GPLed.
CD/DVD April 2005
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
A new release of Misplaced Pages content was published by Directmedia on 6 April 2005. This package consisted of a 2.7 GB DVD and a separate bootable CDROM (running a version of Linux with Firefox). The CDROM did not contain all the data, but was included to accommodate users without DVD-drives. The DVD used Directmedia's Digibib software and article format; everything could be installed to a hard drive. In addition, the DVD contained an HTML tree, as well as Misplaced Pages articles formatted for use with PDAs (specifically, the Mobipocket and TomeRaider formats).
The production of the DVD motivated the Personendaten project (see above).
The vetting process was similar to the one for the CD described above and took place on a separate MediaWiki server. The process took about a week and involved 33 Wikipedians, communicating on IRC. To prevent duplication of work, editors would protect every article that they had reviewed; links to protected articles were shown in green. Lists of potential spammed or vandalized articles had been produced ahead of time with SQL queries. Unacceptable articles were simply deleted on the spot. While the XML articles for the earlier CD version had been produced from HTML, this time a script was used to convert Wiki markup directly to the Digibib format. The final DVD contained about 205,000 articles, with every article linking to a list of contributors.
Directmedia sold 30,000 DVDs, at €9.90 each. This price included 16% taxes and a one-euro donation to Wikimedia Deutschland; production costs were about €2. The DVD image can also be downloaded for free.
Following the successful launch of the DVD, Directmedia donated high-resolution pictures of 10,000 public domain paintings to Wikimedia Commons (see related Signpost story).
DVD/book December 2005
The next edition of Misplaced Pages content was issued in December 2005 by the publisher Zenodot Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, a sister company of Directmedia. A 139-page book explaining Misplaced Pages, its history and policies was accompanied by a 7.5 GB DVD containing 300,000 articles and 100,000 images. The book with DVD is sold for €9.90; both are also available for free download.
The vetting process for this version was different and did not involve human intervention. A "white list" of trusted Wikipedians was assembled, the last 10 days of every article's history were examined, and the last version edited by a white-listed Wikipedian was chosen for the DVD. If no such version existed, the last version older than 10 days was used. Articles nominated for cleanup or deletion were not used.
DVD December 2006/2007 and 2007/2008
The December 2006–2007 and 2007–2008 edition can be downloaded from dvd.wikimedia.org.
Books
Wikipress series
The December 2005 book about Misplaced Pages was the first in a series titled Wikipress. These books, published by Zenodot, consisted of a collection of Misplaced Pages articles about a common topic, selected and edited by so-called "Wikipeditors" who may receive compensation from Directmedia. The books were assembled on a separate server from those used for the regular German Misplaced Pages pages. Every Wikipress book was accompanied by an "edit card", a post card that readers could send in to edit the book's contents. Wikipress books about the Nobel Peace Prize, bicycles, Antarctica, the Solar System, and Hip hop, amongst others, were released, and other books on topics as diverse as Whales, Conspiracy theories, Manga, Astrophysics, and the Red Cross were in the works. Due to lack of interest, the project was ended after a few books.
100 volume Misplaced Pages
The publisher Zenodot announced in January 2006 that they intend to publish the complete German Misplaced Pages in print, 100 volumes with 800 pages each, starting with the letter A in October 2006, followed by two volumes each month thereafter, to end with Z in 2010. The project, code named WP 1.0, was to be supported by 25 editors employed by Zenodot as well as a scientific advisory board. Changes made to articles before publication would also be available for incorporation into the online Misplaced Pages.
In March 2006, Zenodot organized a "community day" to meet with Wikipedians and discuss the project. Groups of Wikipedians had already begun to polish articles with titles Aa-Af in selected topics. In late March it was announced that the project was put on hold and no books would be published in 2006; the reason given was that community support was lacking.
Bertelsmann
On 22 April 2008, the publisher Bertelsmann announced that it planned to publish a one-volume encyclopedia in September using content from the German-language Misplaced Pages. The volume was planned to include abbreviated entries for the 50,000 most commonly used search terms of the prior two years. The book is priced at 19.95 euros, with one euro from every sale going to the German chapter of the Wikimedia Foundation. It was released on 15 September 2008 in hardcover, containing 992 pages and many illustrations.
Legal issues and controversies
Deletions
The German Misplaced Pages has been criticized for the deletion of articles because they seem "irrelevant" to those who deleted them, even though they seem expedient, meaningful, well written and extensive enough to other people. These discussions have received press coverage in computer magazines as well as in mainstream media.
Unauthorized uses
While everyone is free to use Misplaced Pages content, there are certain conditions, such as attribution, a copy of the license text and no non-free derivative works (see Creative Commons licenses and GNU Free Documentation License for details).
In March 2005, the German news magazine Der Spiegel published an article on the Rwandan genocide in its online edition; it was a copy of Misplaced Pages's article. The article was taken down soon after and replaced with an apology.
In April 2005, the encyclopedia Brockhaus published an article about the new pope Josef Ratzinger in its online edition. Because of its close similarity to Misplaced Pages's article, suspicion arose right away that the Brockhaus article might have been plagiarism. The article was removed soon after but Brockhaus did not apologize or admit guilt (see The Signpost's coverage).
Large-scale copyright infringement (2003–2005)
In mid-November 2005, it was discovered that an anonymous user had entered hundreds of articles from older encyclopedias that had been published from the 1960s to the 1980s in East Germany. The articles were mainly on topics in philosophy and related areas. The user had started in December 2003.
A press release was issued and numerous editors started to remove the copyright protected materials. This was made difficult by the fact that the old encyclopedias were not online and not easily available from many West German libraries, and that the user had used numerous different IP addresses. The Directmedia DVD had to be updated.
Bertrand Meyer article hoax
On 28 December 2005, the article about computer scientist Bertrand Meyer (creator of the Eiffel programming language) was edited by an anonymous user, falsely reporting that Meyer had died four days earlier. The hoax was reported five days later by the Heise News Ticker and the article was immediately corrected. Major news media in Germany and Switzerland picked up on the story. Meyer himself went on to publish a positive evaluation of Misplaced Pages, concluding, "The system succumbed to one of its potential flaws, and quickly healed itself. This doesn't affect the big picture. Just like those about me, rumors about Misplaced Pages's downfall have been grossly exaggerated."
Naming Tron
In 2006, Wikimedia Deutschland, the German chapter of the US Wikimedia Foundation, was drawn into a legal dispute between the parents of the deceased German computer hacker Boris "Tron" Floricic and the Foundation. The parents did not wish Floricic's real name to be publicly mentioned, and in December 2005 they obtained a preliminary injunction in a Berlin court against the American Wikimedia Foundation, requiring removal of Floricic's name from Misplaced Pages. The name was not removed. On 19 January 2006 they obtained a second injunction, this time against Wikimedia Deutschland, prohibiting the address www.wikipedia.de
(which is under control of Wikimedia Deutschland) to redirect to the German Misplaced Pages at de.wikipedia.org
(which is controlled by the Wikimedia Foundation and hosts the actual encyclopedia) as long as Misplaced Pages mentioned Floricic's name. Wikimedia Deutschland complied and replaced the redirect with a note explaining the situation, but without mentioning the Tron case specifically. The German Misplaced Pages remained accessible through de.wikipedia.org
during this time. One day later, Wikimedia Deutschland achieved a suspension of the injunction, and linked from the note at www.wikipedia.de
to the German Misplaced Pages. On 9 February, the court invalidated the injunction, ruling that neither the rights of the deceased nor the rights of the parents were affected by publishing the name; this ruling was upheld on appeal, decided 12 May.
Lutz Heilmann controversy
In November 2008, Lutz Heilmann, a member of the German parliament, obtained a preliminary injunction against Wikimedia Deutschland e. V., forbidding the forwarding of www.wikipedia.de
to de.wikipedia.org
. According to Focus Online, Heilmann objected to claims that he had not completed his university degree, and that he had participated in a business venture involving pornography. The report also suggests that the Misplaced Pages article had been repeatedly altered in line with his claims by an anonymous user operating within the Bundestag building, but Heilmann denied having been involved in an edit war. Wikimedia Germany displayed a page explaining the situation. Heilmann announced on 16 November that he would drop the legal proceedings against Wikimedia Deutschland, regretting that many uninvolved users of the encyclopedia had been affected.
Superprotect and Media Viewer controversy
In 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) "superprotected" a JavaScript file on German Misplaced Pages so that no German editors, not even administrators, were allowed to edit it. This was in response towards controversy surrounding the new Media Viewer (see The Signpost's coverage). Many German editors left over this dispute. An open letter to the WMF was signed by almost 1,000 Wikimedians. In April 2015 Erik Möller left the WMF; the "superprotect" feature was disabled in November.
Reiss Engelhorn Museum
In 2015, the Reiss Engelhorn Museum sued the WMF and its German chapter Wikimedia Deutschland for alleged copyright violations of 17 public domain pictures.
Parodies and forks
In the millennium years, parodies of the German Misplaced Pages include Kamelopedia, created in April 2004, Stupidedia, created in December 2004, and the German version of Uncyclopedia, created in August 2005.
Ulrich Fuchs, a longtime contributor to the German Misplaced Pages, produced a fork known as Wikiweise in April 2005. It was ad-supported, used its own software (but a similar wiki markup), admitted only registered editors, and prominently displayed the real names of every article's major contributors. It has since gone offline.
Copyright law
On 21 March 2019, the German Misplaced Pages went offline to inform users about the European Union's copyright law reformation, the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, which had been voted on in the European Parliament on 27 March 2019. Opponents of the reformation were concerned about the restriction of fundamental rights including a free press and the freedom of speech and arts. The blackouts' purpose was to both inform and protest this controversial decision.
References
- ^ Wikimedia list of Wikipedias and their statistics. Retrieved 5 January 2025.
- ^ Jimmy Wales Alternative language Wikipedias, 16 March 2001
- List of Wikipedias/Table meta.wikimedia.org, Statistics
- Internet Archive's snapshots of German Misplaced Pages HomePage, 21 March 2001 12:10 (revision #9), and related revision history. Retrieved 4 November 2008.
- "Nupedia German-L Section" (6 April 2001), "Vergil" (16 April 2001),"Pylos" (17 April 2001).
- "Polymerase-Kettenreaktion" article on German Wiki showing edit dated May 2001
- Lih, p. 147.
- "Wikimedia Traffic Analysis Report – Page Views per Misplaced Pages Language – Breakdown".
- "Wikimedia Traffic Analysis Report – Page Edits Per Misplaced Pages Language – Breakdown".
- Statistics of German Misplaced Pages (English)
- "Misplaced Pages Statistics – Tables – German". stats.wikimedia.org. Retrieved 26 August 2024.
- "Liste der Biografien". German Misplaced Pages. Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved 26 August 2024.
- "Kategorie:Begriffsklärung". German Misplaced Pages. Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved 26 August 2024.
- ^ ""Relevanzkriterien" (notability guidelines)". 13 January 2009. Retrieved 13 January 2009.
- ^ Lih, p. 148.
- Dobusch, Leonhard (15 January 2016). "Warum Misplaced Pages nach 15 Jahren in der Krise steckt". Süddeutsche Zeitung (in German). Retrieved 30 January 2022.
- Giessler, Denis (15 January 2021). "Misplaced Pages wird 20 Jahre alt: Ungleich verteiltes Wissen". Die Tageszeitung: taz (in German). ISSN 0931-9085. Retrieved 26 July 2023.
- "Absolut diskret: So entlarvt Böhmermann Misplaced Pages-Manipulationen". BR24 (in German). 3 September 2021. Retrieved 22 January 2022.
- "Nach Kritik: DFB entschuldigt sich wegen geändertem Misplaced Pages-Artikel". www.fr.de (in German). 23 January 2021. Retrieved 22 January 2022.
- Lobe, Adrian (25 June 2019). "Gekaufte Wahrheiten auf Misplaced Pages". Süddeutsche.de (in German). Retrieved 22 January 2022.
- Drosdowski, Johannes (24 April 2022). "Enthüllung über Bundesbehörden: Geweihe und Corona-Boni". Die Tageszeitung: taz (in German). ISSN 0931-9085. Retrieved 26 July 2023.
- "Misplaced Pages: Handlungsbedarf bei bezahltem Schreiben". netzpolitik.org (in German). 9 June 2022. Retrieved 26 July 2023.
- "Misplaced Pages:Technik/Datenbank/Download". 6 January 2021 – via Misplaced Pages.
- "Misplaced Pages Statistics – Site map". stats.wikimedia.org.
- ""Bildrechte" (image rights)". 10 January 2009. Retrieved 13 January 2009.
- Misplaced Pages:Belege
- Erik Möller: Misplaced Pages page protection report Wikitech-l mailing list, 14 September 2005
- "Longest page protections, September 2005 - Meta". Meta.wikimedia.org. Retrieved 20 December 2010.
- Tim 'avatar' Bartel: Entsperrung der Misplaced Pages WikiDE-l mailing list, 28 May 2008 07:45:55 GMT
- Misplaced Pages:Stub, de:Misplaced Pages:Stub
- German Misplaced Pages:Poll about the abolishment of the stub template, 28 December 2005
- German Misplaced Pages: Poll about uploading images exclusively in Wikimedia Commons
- German Misplaced Pages: Question regarding image upload and Wikimedia Commons
- Jakob Voss: Metadata with Personendaten and beyond (presentation at Wikimania 2005)
- German Misplaced Pages: Round tables
- International writing contest, March 2005.
- Writing contest (in German)
- Exhibition "Fünf Jahre Misplaced Pages, exhibition charts and photos
- Misplaced Pages Academy web site Archived 13 April 2006 at the Wayback Machine (in German)
- Report: Misplaced Pages meets Brockhaus
- nova-Institut (26 June 2007): Nachwachsende Rohstoffe in die Misplaced Pages! Archived 3 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine Press release. Retrieved 24 October 2007.
- Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (FNR) e. V.October 2007&zeitraum=Formular&minz=0&maxz=1&anzahl=10&zurueck=1 Projektbeschreibung: Nachwachsende Rohstoffe im Misplaced Pages-Online-Lexikon. Retrieved 24 October 2007.
- nova-Institut: Nachwachsende Rohstoffe in die Misplaced Pages! Archived 2 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine Project page. Retrieved 31 July 2008.
- Gross, Doug. "Wiki wars: The 10 most controversial Misplaced Pages pages." (Archive) CNN. 24 July 2013. Retrieved on 26 July 2013.
- ^ Spiegel 19.04.2010, INTERNET, Im Innern des Weltwissens, Mathieu von Rohr
- Experts report : passion outclasses flashy sex appeal (Misplaced Pages) 4 October 2004
- ^ Schult, Thomas J. (14 October 2004). "Lernen vom Schinken in Scheiben". Die Zeit (in German). Archived from the original on 29 August 2024. Retrieved 29 August 2024.
- Hoffmann, Björn (7 July 2005). "Rezension zu: Directmedia Publishing (Hrsg.): Misplaced Pages Frühjahr 2005. Die freie Enzyklopädie" [Review of: Directmedia Publishing, Misplaced Pages Frühjahr 2005: Die freie Enzyklopädie]. H-Soz-u-Kult (in German). Archived from the original on 5 January 2013. Retrieved 30 August 2024.
- Usability test: Finding Information in the German Misplaced Pages - Test Results Archived 6 May 2006 at the Wayback Machine November 2005
- Usability Test Results Available: "Editing in Misplaced Pages" Archived 29 April 2006 at the Wayback Machine, 7 March 2006
- Dorothee Wiegand: "Entdeckungsreise. Digitale Enzyklopädien erklären die Welt". c't 6/2007, 5 March 2007, p. 136-145. Original quote: "Wir haben in den Texten der freien Enzyklopädie nicht mehr Fehler gefunden als in denen der kommerziellen Konkurrenz"
- Misplaced Pages: Wissen für alle. Stern 50/2007, 6 December 2007, pp. 30-44
- Misplaced Pages schlägt Brockhaus Stern online, 5 December 2007 (summary of the test, German)
- K.C. Jones: German Misplaced Pages Outranks Traditional Encyclopedia's Online Version Archived 12 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine. InformationWeek, 7 December 2007
- Urban, Thomas (16 December 2015). "Misplaced Pages: Über hundert Fehler, super!". Süddeutsche.de (in German). Retrieved 22 January 2022.
- ^ "Publikationen/CD 2004". German Misplaced Pages. Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- Kleinz, Torsten (14 October 2004). "Misplaced Pages-CD zum Download". heise online (in German). Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- Torsten Kleinz (9 December 2005). Neue Misplaced Pages-DVD im Handel und zum Download. Heise newsticker (in German).
- "Hauptseite" (in German). Wikipress.de. Retrieved 20 December 2010.
- Heise newsticker: Misplaced Pages wird noch nicht gedruckt, 24 March 2006 (in German)
- "Misplaced Pages to go book-based in Germany", Agence France-Presse, 23 April 2008
- "Further deletions of Linux distributions in Misplaced Pages proposed" article in a Linux computer magazine 10 April 2007
- "Misplaced Pages: The fight for relevance" in c't computer magazine 30 October 2009
- "Misplaced Pages: Dispute about arbitrary deletions" article in a Windows computer magazine 19 October 2009
- "Misplaced Pages: World champion in deleting?" on gulli.com news 27 December 2009
- Article about the planned deletion of a Misplaced Pages article about a TV celebrity on the news portal of T-Home (biggest ISP in Germany) 16 July 2010
- German Spiegel Copied Misplaced Pages 9 March 2005
- Report on copyright infringement
- Defense and illustration of Misplaced Pages Archived 22 March 2006 at the Wayback Machine, by Bertrand Meyer, January 2006
- "Spiegel online article (German)". Spiegel.de. 10 January 2006. Retrieved 20 December 2010.
- online, heise (16 August 2014). "Misplaced Pages: Superprotect-Streit spitzt sich zu". heise online.
- "Golem.de: IT-News für Profis". www.golem.de.
- "Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer". meta.wikimedia.org. 19 August 2014. Retrieved 21 August 2016.
- "Superprotect". meta.wikimedia.org. 2015. Retrieved 21 August 2016.
- Michelle Paulson; Geoff Brigham (23 November 2015). "Wikimedia Foundation, Wikimedia Deutschland urge Reiss Engelhorn Museum to reconsider suit over public domain works of art". Wikimedia blog. Retrieved 21 August 2016.
- Benjamin Sutton (8 December 2015). "Museum Sues Wikimedia for Hosting Copyrighted Photos of Its Public-Domain Artworks". Hyperallergic. Retrieved 21 August 2016.
- Chip.de: Brockhaus für Kamele - Misplaced Pages-Parodien Archived 4 August 2012 at archive.today, 11 March 2008 (in German)
Further reading
- Lih, Andrew. The Misplaced Pages Revolution. Hyperion, New York City. 2009. First Edition. ISBN 978-1-4013-0371-6 (alkaline paper).
External links
- [REDACTED] Media related to German Misplaced Pages at Wikimedia Commons
- German Misplaced Pages mobile version (in German)
- Meta: German Misplaced Pages
- Wikimedia Deutschland (in German)
- Publication efforts on CD/DVD (in German):
- WP 1.0, publication in book form (in German):
- Geschichte, a personal history of the German Misplaced Pages, written by one of the core Wikipedians (in German)
- Report from the German Misplaced Pages, Misplaced Pages Signpost, 6 November 2006
Wikipedias in Germanic languages | ||
---|---|---|
6,000,000+ articles | [REDACTED] | |
2,000,000+ | ||
500,000+ | ||
200,000+ | ||
100,000+ | ||
50,000+ | ||
20,000+ | ||
10,000+ | ||
5,000+ | ||
2,000+ | ||
500+ |