Revision as of 22:40, 2 October 2010 editMandarax (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers388,559 editsm Add listas per WP:NAMESORT using AWB (7159)← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 16:20, 12 January 2025 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots8,084,839 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. (Fix Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with unknown parameters)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
(11 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|listas=Lerner, Jennifer|blp=yes| |
|
{{WPBiography |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|s&a-work-group=yes}} |
|
|living=yes |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Psychology}} |
|
|class=Stub |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Women scientists }} |
|
|auto=yes |
|
|
|listas=Lerner, Jennifer |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Psychology|class=|importance=}} |
|
|
|
==Controversies== |
|
|
I've removed the controversies section for now because that material may belong elsewhere (if anywhere). It has the look of a coatrack. --] 21:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:Agree with removal as ] in a ]. -- ''']''' (]) 23:24, 23 October 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Add ] for DVD "Mind over Money"? ] (]) 00:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Issues of ] in ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Lerner's name has been mentioned in connection with two controversies, both of which some person is very eager to see added to this article. In one case, data was falsified by a CMU student with two masters degrees and a previous publication record, a student for whom Lerner was one of several advisors and whose bad data corrupted some papers that she had coauthored with Lerner. In another, Lerner was in technical violation of some confidentiality requirements regarding grant proposals. A , uploaded to Wikimedia Commons by now-banned Humbert1, makes clear the utter triviality of what was in question and what was the result -- that in future she would ask for explicit permission from the NSF before seeking the technical assistance she needs due to a physical disability. Information about these two non-notable events, edited in a way to shed the most unflattering light on Lerner, were repeatedly added to this article by Humbert1 until he was finally banned for edit-warring. The matter was taken to the where it met clear consensus that it violated ] and ]. The same exact material was added in mid-November by a new editor, whose interest in Misplaced Pages seems to have died at once after those stories got put back in here. They don't belong in the bio.] (]) 01:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Betsythedevine is obvious shill for the Harvard General Counsel. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
: I am a longtime Misplaced Pages editor with no connection to Harvard's General Counsel, to Lerner, or to most of the bios on my Watchlist. ] (]) 21:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC) |
Lerner's name has been mentioned in connection with two controversies, both of which some person is very eager to see added to this article. In one case, data was falsified by a CMU student with two masters degrees and a previous publication record, a student for whom Lerner was one of several advisors and whose bad data corrupted some papers that she had coauthored with Lerner. In another, Lerner was in technical violation of some confidentiality requirements regarding grant proposals. A pdf of the rebuke to Lerner, uploaded to Wikimedia Commons by now-banned Humbert1, makes clear the utter triviality of what was in question and what was the result -- that in future she would ask for explicit permission from the NSF before seeking the technical assistance she needs due to a physical disability. Information about these two non-notable events, edited in a way to shed the most unflattering light on Lerner, were repeatedly added to this article by Humbert1 until he was finally banned for edit-warring. The matter was taken to the BLP noticeboard where it met clear consensus that it violated WP:BLP and WP:WEIGHT. The same exact material was added in mid-November by a new editor, whose interest in Misplaced Pages seems to have died at once after those stories got put back in here. They don't belong in the bio.betsythedevine (talk) 01:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC)