Misplaced Pages

User talk:TeleComNasSprVen: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:59, 20 October 2010 editJohnCD (talk | contribs)130,355 edits Notifying about declined speedy deletion (CSDH)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:13, 12 July 2024 edit undoJonesey95 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors378,702 edits Notification: listing of Template:Wrong place at WP:Templates for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
(285 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{archives|archivelist=User:TeleComNasSprVen/The Piggy Bank|title=] ]}} {{archives|archivelist=User:TeleComNasSprVen/The Piggy Bank|title=]}}
{{busy}}
{{Statustop|nocat=yes}}
{{busyweekdays}}


== T: template redirects ==
*
**
OMG! It's RickK: ]


Hi, you participated in ], some of which I have relisted at ]. Please come along and share your thoughts .. ;-) <span style="font-variant:small-caps">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></span> 15:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Note: I've become more interested in writing Misplaced Pages policy than I am in writing articles.
:Ah sorry, I just noticed this letter in my email today. Unfortunately if you have noticed I have not participated in any Misplaced Pages activities since almost three years ago, so I may be a little rusty at this. ] (] &bull; ]) 21:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
::I notified everyone who I saw was active somewhere; in your case it was on English Wiktionary. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this matter, and good to see you back here. Regards, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></span> 03:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC)


== Article subpages ==
'''Anything else goes below this line.'''
----


Hi. I was browsing your contributions, and I noticed that you created ] and ]. Would you explain your reasoning? I can think of two possible reasons: convenience when navigating from the corresponding talk archive or preventing ], although talk page archives are already exempt. I was under the impression that these "subpages" (actually disabled in article space) should not be created, although I didn't find a prohibition in ]. ] (]) 05:28, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
= October 2010 =
:Hello, and thanks for inquiring. Yes, I had both of those reasons in mind when I added the new redirects, and I'd forgotten the subpage system is not recognized by the MediaWiki software for the mainspace; I'd simply clicked on the corresponding link from the talk archives and redirect myself up one level, so to speak. Though perhaps, on having better thought of it, these things would be treated as articles and simply take up more room in the mainspace when they shouldn't be (inflating PAGECOUNT and/or ARTICLECOUNT etc), and my stance is usually against that stuff anyway, sort of like the pseudo-namespace issue. Anyway, and not just for my own sake of remembering, I'd like to see more clear policies about this, discouraging creation of such redirects, maybe written into ]. This is good material for seeking wider discussion (RFC, VPR, etc). I'm considering deleting them for that but they are somewhat useful in navigating articlespace. ] (] &bull; ]) 05:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
:<small>Unrelated note: Archiving your talkpage is good practice as it makes it easier to follow your discussions and loads the page quicker for the less technologically inclined. ] (] &bull; ]) 05:51, 18 December 2013 (UTC)</small>
:: Thanks for your quick response and ]-ing the pages. ] seems like the best place, with notifications at ] and ] per ]. I prefer the specific page over the village pumps due to the relative ease of finding old discussions and not having to worry about short auto-archiving. (I see your pseudo-namespace RfC at VPP.) Regarding my talk page, I have put archiving on my to-do list, but I came across a very old discussion that needs investigation. ] (]) 05:55, 28 December 2013 (UTC)


== WP:WWF/D/2010/O == == Re: Editor review ==


Hello TeleComNasSprVen. Just wanted to drop a note to thank you for the review you left. I am grateful for the time you took to examine and put together your observations. I haven't been editing much lately, but your notes will be taken to heart when I am back. Happy Editing. ] (]) 14:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Would you like to join in the fun of wikifying pages at our ]? Barnstars will be handed out to participants. ] (] &bull; ] &bull; ] &bull; ]) 00:19, 1 October 2010 (UTC)


== NPD == == ] ==


Can you review my one please? ] (]) 08:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
You marked quite a few images one week ago today at {{tl|npd}}. Many of these images are marked pd-self (e.g., ), with no compelling reason to mark as npd. May I ask you to be more careful in your image tagging? ] (]) 01:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)


==Disambiguation link notification for December 24==
In fact, today alone on patrol I had to remove 9 ( ) {{tls|npd}} mistaggings of yours on images. Out of those, 3 of those ''might'' be considered unfree due to being a derivative work - really they should be going through ], as they're not clear-cut cases - but the rest are just inexplicable. Just as bad, not a single npd edit you made was actually valid - none of them were deletable. This not only creates more work for us as administrators, but is rather ]y towards our users. Please consider being more careful with Twinkle - I do warn you that other users have had their right to use it revoked in the past for being too hasty with it.


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ], ] and ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
Apologies if this message is harsh but hopefully you understand the need for it. Thanks. ] (]) 02:12, 1 October 2010 (UTC)


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
==HareKrishnaPortal==
I see, that[REDACTED] is mostly atheistic. So what should I do? Wait till atheists kill whole world??? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Your ] nomination of ]==
== ] ==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi
|doc=yes
|User=Darkwarriorblake
|1=t
}} 23:30, 24 December 2013 (UTC)


==Concerning That Category Spamming IP==
Is "unreadable" a good justification for requesting speedy deletion of a user page in Arabic? --] ] 15:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
The Indonesian vandal currently as {{IPvandal|36.74.205.62}} is either totally and completely incapable of, or lacks all desire to communicate in any way with other editors. So far, the way I and other users, like ], deal with it is to revert everything it does, and get its current IP anon-blocked.--] (]) 16:37, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
:Thanks, I'll keep that in mind for my future reports. ] (] &bull; ]) 19:21, 25 December 2013 (UTC)


== r from plural is restricted to mainspace ==
== Files that you tagged ==


Just to let you know that I changed the redirect template on ] because {{tlx|r from plural}} is ].
Sorry, but if a source is valid at one time, it is always valid for the purposes of this criterion. It's vaguely like print sources: unless we have good reason to believe otherwise, we assume good faith on the part of the uploader. Alternatively, think of rotten links as sources for content: as long as they're properly sourced, with access dates, all style guides accept them as valid. Even if you have good reason to believe that the uploader didn't follow policy, do not edit image descriptions as you did: sources are provided, and removal of them is disruptive. If you find an image whose rotten link you don't trust to have contained the permission that is claimed, you should take it to FFD. ] (]) 00:27, 7 October 2010 (UTC)


You probably wouldn't have noticed this without checking ] because the official MediaWiki preview function doesn't currently preview templates on redirects. (], however, does.)
== Removed speedy deletion tag: ] ==
Hi TeleComNasSprVen! Firstly, thanks for helping out in ]. I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on ]- because: ''blanking is not taken as a deletion request in the userspace.'' If you have any questions or other message, please contact me. Thanks ]<sup>]</sup> (]) 15:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)


Should we consider removing the namespace restrictions on the ''r from/to plural'' templates or creating new "r from/to plural in non-main namespace" templates? (Sorry if you're not the best person to talk to on this - who might be able to help better? I tried starting ] on the former when I , but I didn't get much of a response due to the poor wording of my question.) --] (]) 19:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
== Speedy deletion, ''again'' ==
:Sorry, I meant ] and {{tlx|r to plural}} (]). --] (]) 21:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
::Sure, I'll ask around at relevant forums like the ]. But yeah I didn't know anything about this so I'm not the best person to talk to. ] (] &bull; ]) 18:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
:::Alright, so I asked around the village pump and ] telling me that they use a template to check if something is in the main namespace or not and that if I want to change the way the R-template series works I'd have to propose changes to how the <code><nowiki>|main category=</nowiki></code> code for the template works. But I've also found another alternative that we could use to categorize such redirects in the meantime, {{tlx|R to help namespace}}. If you want to start up discussion about this let me know, but I think the {{tlx|R to help namespace}} template will solve this problem for the time being. ] (] &bull; ]) 01:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)


== Hello ==
*{{lf|MOHAR11.jpg}}
I see you mistagged the above image again. I'll overlook the fact that ] doesn't apply to images on commons, and assume you meant F8 - but the images aren't even of the same tint. Please slow down TCNSV, your talk page is littered with requests to review CSD better and slow down. If you don't, we may have to remove your ability to use Twinkle at all (yes, we can do that). ] (]) 22:58, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
:Thank you, but I believe that was established after the fact. In any case, if it is that important, I might as well bring it to FfD sometime; I cannot see any mention currently of the tint of the picture having a bearing on the csd criteria. ]]] 04:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
The wording states ''Images available as '''identical''' copies on the Wikimedia Commons'' (or higher quality/resolution). The previous wording I suppose was clearer: "bit for bit copy". ] (]) 04:47, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


Glad youre back. Do you remember me? ]<span style="background-color: #9ffff5; padding: 3px; border-radius: 6px 6px 6px 6px;"><b>]</b></span>] 13:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
== ] (2)==


==Disambiguation link notification for December 31==
Thanks. I really, really hate Huggle from time to time. ] (]) 04:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

:No problem. ]]] 04:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:08, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

== Orphaned templates ==

Hello. Thank you for removing "deprecated" as a speedy criteria. You say there is no consensus that orphaned should not be a speedy criteria. I had another look, and I see 5 in favor and one making a joke. Perhaps you could have a look again, or explain to me what I am missing. You may post here, I'll watch your talk page. ] (]) 12:40, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
:] doesn't seem to support the removal of the ''orphaned template'' yet, but he may change his mind. Consensus has been pretty clear though for removal of {{tl|db-deprecated}}. Maybe we could ask him to just use G6 (general maintenance) as a speedy tag in the future. ] (] &bull; ]) 03:39, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
:: Three editors posted below him and disagree, and two others in other places in the discussion. And even he doesn't seem to be seriously opposed, just would prefer to have a speedy alternative to Tfd for orphaned templates. ] (]) 10:05, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

== AN ==

Hi,

It looks like you've posted twice you latest !vote on AN. ] (]) 06:38, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
:I've just noticed that; I guess MediaWiki's being slow again... ] (] &bull; ]) 06:55, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for January 9==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:10, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ]==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has failed ]; see ] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. <!-- Template:GANotice result=fail --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi
|doc=yes
|User=Darkwarriorblake
|1=t
}} 17:22, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

== Cosmo Wright ==

Hi TCNSPV, you recently detagged the ] speedrunner article on the basis that he is a record holder. Firstly, I'm not sure that his record counts. It doesn't appear to be ratified by Guinness, for instance, which I would assume is the usual arbiter in this case? Secondly, the page's author and assorted associates are now attempting to use that article as a wedge to include other speedrunner articles (e.g. ]) "because other speedrunners have wikis". ]_] 03:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
:Hi, thanks for contacting me. I detagged the article on the grounds that it does satisfy ] which states: "An article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant...may be deleted under this criteria." However, because the article clearly stated that the subject held "the world record for the fastest time completing " it therefore does not fall under the purview of A7. Whether or not his record counts is only relevant to notability; to satisfy the 'claim of significance' criteria, which is a different standard and much lower than notability, all an article has to do is make a claim that the subject is significant in some way, without needing to justify that significance. As I explained to the creator of the article, it may still be deleted due to lack of sourcing to prove its notability. If you wish, you may take it to ] or use ] for it. ] (] &bull; ]) 03:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

== Rollback and reviewer userights granted ==

Hello TeleComNasSprVen. Your account has been granted the "<tt>rollback</tt>" and "{{mono|reviewer}}" user rights. These user rights allow you to ] on pages protected by pending changes and ].

;]
]
:Please keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
:*Rollback should never be used to ].
:*Rollback should be used to revert ''clear'' cases of ] ''only'', and not ].
:*Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see ] (even though you're not an admin).

;]
]
:The list of articles awaiting review is located at ], while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at ]. You may find the following pages useful to review:
:*], the guideline on reviewing.
:*], the summary of the use of pending changes.
:*], the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Feel free to leave a message on my ] if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the ]. Happy editing! <!-- Template:Rollback and reviewer granted --> <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 09:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

== Turkish Wikimedia chapter wiki ==

I should probably email Vito Genovese about this matter too, though he's been inactive since but I wanted to ask you whether or not you plan on participating any longer in the chapter wiki or that we should leave it up to the stewards to handle requests. Basically, in a fellow steward told me to leave it up to the heads of the chapter wiki, but I do not know exactly who the founder is and whether he/she has the time to manage and take care of the wiki, so instead I have to write to the system-operators of that wiki. Oh by the way, that comment in the thread was regarding which appeared to be spam, though again I leave it up to your judgments. ] (] &bull; ]) 17:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
:I deleted that specific page as it was spam (self promotion; potential BLP-vio), I have been quite busy with real-world affairs (mainly my thesis which seems to drag on). Thank you for notifying me though. The wiki and the progress of the chapter isn't ideal but I think both needs time. That said we may wish for an "approval" type registration for the wiki assuming the community approves or perhaps that may be counter productive. --<small> ]</small> <sup>]</sup> 08:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
::<span class="template-ping">@]:</span> Sorry for bothering you again, but I think some more spam reappeared on the wiki after that last deletion. Since you seem really busy, do you think you could transfer sysop controls over to me/trwiki admin/global sysop/anyone else that you may trust, so that we can maintain the spam while you're gone? ] (] &bull; ]) 23:17, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
:::I am right here, I will monitor the site closer as I am done with my work as of 28 February 2014. That said, I do not mind any help but it is not like the site is seeing an overwhelming attack at the moment. --<small> ]</small> <sup>]</sup> 00:37, 2 March 2014 (UTC)


== FYI == == FYI ==


A proposal has been made to create a Live Feed to enhance the processing of Articles for Creation and Drafts. See ]. Your comments are welcome. ] (]) 06:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
FYI, please keep ] in mind when you MfD multiple pages. ] (]) 07:16, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
:Thanks. I'll keep the page watchlisted and read it over but no promises on me commenting, I'm quite busy IRL and on other Wikimedia projects. ] (] &bull; ]) 09:48, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
:Would tag all the pages listed at ] with the MfD tag? This helps closing admins who use ] delete those pages automatically. Otherwise, they would have to delete them manually. ] (]) 05:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
::{{doing}} ]]] 05:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


== ] == == Faritz Abdul Hameed ==


You certainly would have been within your rights to BLPPROD, but a better way is to try and find a source yourself, as I have done, which shows notability per ]. ]] 10:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
How does this qualify for G6? I've declined it for now. ]] 05:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
:Same for ]. I am aware you moved the welcome to the talk page, but not via page moving, so just keep the pages for attribution, if anything. ]] 05:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
::Same for ]. Deleted the rest you tagged per G6. Got your message on my talk as well, ]] 05:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
I've your G7 of ] as well because it is a sandbox, and I would think they'd be cleared periodically. It doesn't look like the user explicitly requested deletion, so I see no harm in letting it remain. ]] 05:26, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
:Alright, thanks for the notification. If I see any more of his sandboxes, I should probably undo the same. ]]] 05:29, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


== updated since my last visit ==
== Speedies declined ==


what is this "updated since my last visit" in green that's started to appear on History pages? What makes it happen, and what's the point? It appears next to your recent edit on ]. —] (]) 07:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I've declined your speedy-deletion requests for ] and ], because the relevant MfD, ], does not appear to extend to all similar pages. Feel free to open a separate MfD for these two pages. ] (]) 16:07, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


:I think that that message simply shows the number of changes by revision entries starting from your last visit to the page. For example, if you viewed ] as it appears on ] (found at the top in the URL field) you will see that it has this message: "This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anomalocaris (talk | contribs) at 15:42, 11 February 2014." Now if you closed the tab or window on the page, it will record the changes by revisions that have appeared since you last viewed that revision, so revisions ] and ] will have the green bar highlighted next to them. Perhaps this should be better documented somewhere at ], but you can always ask some of the more technically minded people hanging around ] to help explain it to you better. ] (] &bull; ]) 09:00, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
== Bulk {{tl|prod}} tagging of Lotus cars ==


== Your shared-account RFC ==
Really bad move. Did you have a ], or were you just trying to disrupt things for other editors? Your talk page is full of complaints about your over-hasty seeking of deletion. Hasn't the hint dropped yet? ] (]) 02:18, 12 October 2010 (UTC)


Also, why are you using a sockpuppet to do this. Are you simply ashamed of the contributions history for it, and want to distance yourself from your own edits? ] (]) 02:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC) I have some ideas about this. Where would you like them: on its talk page, or at ]? ] (]) 21:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
:You can modify the document directly and note the changes at VPI. ] (] &bull; ]) 21:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


== FrescoBot on Commons ==
:You have {{user|TCNSV}} listed as a ], however doppelgängers are not supposed to be used for editing, they are to be used to prevent someone from impersonating you, by using a username that is similar to your own. --] (]) 06:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)


The bot is back. ;) I updated also the Commons script and I had test it. It took a while, but now it is running. -- ] (]) 08:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
== Disruptive picture move requests ==
:Thanks! ] (] &bull; ]) 09:42, 21 February 2014 (UTC)


==Disambiguation link notification for February 24==
Please stop them. The file name <nowiki>]</nowiki> does not violate the generic provision of file naming conventions. In addition, you requested a move after it was clear there was no consensus for the move on the talk page, and in addition made the strange implication that the uploader was a Texan. Remember that the uploader has a fair amount of leeway in naming files. Thank you. '''<font face="Verdana">]]</font>''' 06:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
:"Requests"? It was just one file name request that you refer to. First, what proof do you have I made more than one such request? Second, where is the policy that states "the uploader has a fair amount of leeway in naming files"? Please remain under ] and tell me sincerely since I don't know all of Misplaced Pages's rules. I'll also be happy to ] on the talkpage instead if you want. ]]] 07:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
== Need to use edit summaries ==


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
] Thank you for ] to ]. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an ], which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to ]. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for ]). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-editsummary -->


== ] ==
Using inappropriate summaries such as '' 'rv promo.' '' when applied to a non-controversial formatting or linkage issues create an unwarranted appearance of an overly-promotional article and could be considered as ]. ] (]) 13:09, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

There's already ]. ]] 14:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
:Thanks, I'll keep that watchlisted from my bugzilla account. ] (] &bull; ]) 14:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

== You have a message at Simple English Misplaced Pages ==

Please check ] and reply there. Thanks! --] (]) 06:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

== The "Spiral of silence" diagram ==

''""'' → Thank you very much indeed for your endeavour. I know that there is still a gesture of goodwill in the community. --] (]) 17:23, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

== Your 'Speedy Deletion Request' on cy wiki ==

I've left you a message on cy wp regarding your request. ] (]) 05:36, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

== AUM Schematic ==
Thanks for your response over at your ] page on wikimedia commons, I'm a little confused about the way you worded it though. Were you referring ot the original verion of the diagram from the anxiety/uncertainty management pdf? If necessary it'd be fine to use that, I guess. The issue is mostly an aesthetic one from my perspective, I'd hate to be forced to use a low quality, poorly-designed diagram in place of an updated one. What if I were to copy the diagram exactly and declare that it isn't my work? Forgive me for the hassle, I'm new to this and I'm eager to do things through the proper channels, I just don't want to sacrifice article quality wherever possible. ] (]) 12:17, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
:Actually, I think the SVG rendering may be better than the original enough that it does not warrant copyright violation anymore. As such I've pulled the tag. So it's mostly my fault, sorry for the confusion! Basically for copyright law, you want to minimize how close something looks like to another thing, otherwise it looks close to plagiarism. But the SVG might not be the case. If you're still worried about deletion, we can keep a local copy on English Misplaced Pages just in case. ] (] &bull; ]) 12:25, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
::Awesome, thanks! I uploaded a second version just now which is altered a little more (I cleaned up the text, which wasn't rendering well for me, and changed some of the phrasing). Take care, thanks again for your help. ] (]) 12:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

==You've got mail!==
{{you've got mail|subject=|ts=06:34, 23 March 2014 (UTC)}}
]&nbsp;<sup>]] ]]</sup> 06:34, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

== Treaty merger ==

I'm looking over it now. It was a pretty sloppily executed merger, to be honest -- duplicated categories, reuse of the same photo that appears in the ] infobox already, and totally redundant information on the treaty already covered in the Timeline section of the article merged to. As the editor who created the treaty page to begin with, I'm not seeing anything from that article that hasn't been incorporated into the accession page aside from the Wikisource link, and that's easy enough to rectify. If there's something I am missing, please advise. -] (]) 14:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

== FYI, policy is not ], only verifiability (and truth is ok!) ==

Was reading: . Might not matter much there but ] is an essay about the previous policy (there was a controversy and it was changed). I better be right about this as I changed ] to be in sync with English Misplaced Pages.. ] (]) 00:33, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
:If you think so, but it is only an essay. My take on it is that the "truth" is whatever Misplaced Pages's sources say, not what ''you'' think the truth might be. As example, if ten different reliable sources or news stations report that the sky is green, and you think the sky is blue, ultimately Misplaced Pages will say the sky is green. (There are also complications when Misplaced Pages's sources cite Misplaced Pages itself, creating a ] self-reference and thereby creating a "new" truth. We tend to try to avoid those.) ] (] &bull; ]) 00:52, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
::It'n not only what I think. This is the policy ], see note one below. What is true about the essay and previous policy is that the truth is a high bar for many people and would create fear in people about including stuff. But it could also be misunderstood to mean if it's verifiable it doesn't have to be true. Now if stuff is verifiable but turns out to be untrue, I assume that source can be taken out as it is not reliable. ] (]) 14:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

== Wditor Review ==

Hey. Thanks for the review and the kind words. I am thinking of being active again, not sure where to start! --] <sup>](])</sup> 15:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

== Unneeded replacement of disqus logo ==

Why did you replace my upload of the "EXACT" same thing? Without telling my why and leaving a notice for the "orphaned image" on my talk page? You may be busy in real life but you have no problems completely eliminating my contributions to Misplaced Pages. --] (]) 17:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
:I'm sorry, but I am confused by what you are trying to say. If your image was deleted, it was probably because it was replaceable non-free media or it was uploaded as a lower resolution version of the original image. According to ] and ], such non-free images whereby a free equivalent exists and can easily replace, may be subject to deletion. I've poked around your logs and I think that with the Disqus logo, you may want to discuss this with the deleting administrator ]. ] (] &bull; ]) 04:44, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
::{{ping|Kmg90}} The image was correctly switched out with a version of the logo which was on Wikimedia Commons (our media repository). We do not need duplicate copies of images or logos, so the version that you uploaded was deleted. Because your version was marked as non-free, the easiest way to process was to deleted it as an orphaned non-free image, although it could have been just as easily speedy deleted as a duplicate image. This is the reason for the notice on your talk page, so that you would be aware of the pending deletion and could resolve any issues.
::As a side note, none of your contributions have been "eliminated," rather, all that happened was a differently-named logo was swapped out. If you have any further questions or issues, feel free to bring it to my talk page and I will be happy to work with you. Cheers, ''''']'''''</span> (]) 21:21, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
== Tàu listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Tàu'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ]]] 03:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image File:Procession Under Tuma - Joey L.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 11:51, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

== Enjoy! ==

<center>
{| style="border:1px solid 3px; background-color: purple;<!--#FF0000;--> width: 755px;"
|rowspan="2" valign="center" | <!--]-->]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |<font color="gold"><span style{{=}}"font-family:Segoe Script">'''Happy Holiday Cheer'''</span>
|-
|style="vertical-align:top; border-top:1px solid gray; color:#FFA060" | <font color="white">'''Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes ], and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user an ] and a ], whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings! ''Joys!''''' ]
|}</center>

== Happy Holidays! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |
----
'''Hello TeleComNasSprVen, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this ]. Spread the ] by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. <br>
Happy editing,<br>
] (]) 04:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC)


''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}''
== Sockpuppet issues ==
|}
<small>Sent by ] (]) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;{{Noping|Technical 13}}&#125;&#125; to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on ]</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Technical 13@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Technical_13/Holiday_list&oldid=639096433 -->


== Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians ==
Raised at ] ] (]) 13:41, 12 October 2010 (UTC)


You have been mentioned at ]. 15:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
== Talkback: ] ==
==Orphaned non-free image File:Marina Inoue seiyū.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 22:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
{{Talkback|Template talk:Citation needed|Reinserting_Merge_discussion_template|18:08, 12 October 2010 (UTC)}} — ''']]''' 18:08, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
== WikiProject Cooperation listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''WikiProject Cooperation'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 06:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image File:Mitsuki Saiga seiyū.jpg==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:28, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
== Whoa, whoa, whoa, stop first ==


== ] ==
Whoa, hold it with all the Youth Olympics AFDs. As you can see from ], there is no consensus yet on how to treat these articles — but there is agreement that these are not "non-notable". I'd ask you stop AFDing any others for now and open a discussion on the individual events' notability first (] I guess, or ]) — and if there's agreement the individual events aren't important enough, we can then go about AFDing or merging them. ] (] • ] • ]) 10:59, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
:Thanks for the notification. After reading over the AfD and the link you've provided, it was good you intervened in time, seeing as how I was still poring over ] before the banner came up. ]]] 11:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
::Also, regarding the deadlinks — I mentioned it to ] recently, and we're planning to go around and fix them asap. It should be able to reference results, even for each individual phase of the competition, if that's any sort of issue. The main issue I can see is introducing prose into the article to make them less sports-results-y. ] (] • ] • ]) 11:07, 13 October 2010 (UTC)


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
== Online Video Streaming ==
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692221704 -->


== Conflict of interest editing (article) ==
Thanks for the heads-up. I just forgot (and, I guess, I was a little ashamed of having blocked so quickly). ] (]) 15:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)


FYI. I have a question for you at ] here:
== Speedy deletion declined: ] ==
:]
Hello TeleComNasSprVen. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''I don't think this qualifies as an attack page - let the MfD decide whether it's an appropriate use of user space.''' Thank you. ] (]) 11:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
<p>--] (]) 22:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Awesome Face}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 03:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 13:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:13, 12 July 2024

Archiving icon
Archives

2010


2011


2013


This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

T: template redirects

Hi, you participated in Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 December 29#T:, some of which I have relisted at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 November_18#T:WPTECH. Please come along and share your thoughts .. ;-) John Vandenberg 15:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Ah sorry, I just noticed this letter in my email today. Unfortunately if you have noticed I have not participated in any Misplaced Pages activities since almost three years ago, so I may be a little rusty at this. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 21:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
I notified everyone who I saw was active somewhere; in your case it was on English Wiktionary. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this matter, and good to see you back here. Regards, John Vandenberg 03:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Article subpages

Hi. I was browsing your contributions, and I noticed that you created Ipse dixit/Archive (Bare assertion fallacy) and Flo Rida/Archive 1. Would you explain your reasoning? I can think of two possible reasons: convenience when navigating from the corresponding talk archive or preventing G8 speedy deletion, although talk page archives are already exempt. I was under the impression that these "subpages" (actually disabled in article space) should not be created, although I didn't find a prohibition in WP:Subpages. Flatscan (talk) 05:28, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and thanks for inquiring. Yes, I had both of those reasons in mind when I added the new redirects, and I'd forgotten the subpage system is not recognized by the MediaWiki software for the mainspace; I'd simply clicked on the corresponding link from the talk archives and redirect myself up one level, so to speak. Though perhaps, on having better thought of it, these things would be treated as articles and simply take up more room in the mainspace when they shouldn't be (inflating PAGECOUNT and/or ARTICLECOUNT etc), and my stance is usually against that stuff anyway, sort of like the pseudo-namespace issue. Anyway, and not just for my own sake of remembering, I'd like to see more clear policies about this, discouraging creation of such redirects, maybe written into Misplaced Pages:Redirect. This is good material for seeking wider discussion (RFC, VPR, etc). I'm considering deleting them for that but they are somewhat useful in navigating articlespace. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 05:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Unrelated note: Archiving your talkpage is good practice as it makes it easier to follow your discussions and loads the page quicker for the less technologically inclined. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 05:51, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your quick response and G7-ing the pages. WT:Redirect seems like the best place, with notifications at WT:Subpages and WP:Village pump (policy) per WP:Publicising discussions. I prefer the specific page over the village pumps due to the relative ease of finding old discussions and not having to worry about short auto-archiving. (I see your pseudo-namespace RfC at VPP.) Regarding my talk page, I have put archiving on my to-do list, but I came across a very old discussion that needs investigation. Flatscan (talk) 05:55, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Re: Editor review

Hello TeleComNasSprVen. Just wanted to drop a note to thank you for the review you left. I am grateful for the time you took to examine and put together your observations. I haven't been editing much lately, but your notes will be taken to heart when I am back. Happy Editing. Yazan (talk) 14:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

WP:ER

Can you review my one please? Soham (talk) 08:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Civilization IV, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Raze, Queue and Pros and cons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Civilization IV

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Civilization IV you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Darkwarriorblake -- Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:30, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Concerning That Category Spamming IP

The Indonesian vandal currently as 36.74.205.62 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) is either totally and completely incapable of, or lacks all desire to communicate in any way with other editors. So far, the way I and other users, like User:Fama Clamosa, deal with it is to revert everything it does, and get its current IP anon-blocked.--Mr Fink (talk) 16:37, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind for my future reports. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 19:21, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

r from plural is restricted to mainspace

Just to let you know that I changed the redirect template on Help:Conditional expressions because {{r from plural}} is only allowed in the main namespace.

You probably wouldn't have noticed this without checking the relevant category because the official MediaWiki preview function doesn't currently preview templates on redirects. (User:Js/ajaxPreview, however, does.)

Should we consider removing the namespace restrictions on the r from/to plural templates or creating new "r from/to plural in non-main namespace" templates? (Sorry if you're not the best person to talk to on this - who might be able to help better? I tried starting discussion on the former when I encountered this issue previously, but I didn't get much of a response due to the poor wording of my question.) --SoledadKabocha (talk) 19:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I meant Help:Conditional expression and {{r to plural}} (doc). --SoledadKabocha (talk) 21:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Sure, I'll ask around at relevant forums like the Misplaced Pages:Village pump. But yeah I didn't know anything about this so I'm not the best person to talk to. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 18:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Alright, so I asked around the village pump and here is the thread telling me that they use a template to check if something is in the main namespace or not and that if I want to change the way the R-template series works I'd have to propose changes to how the |main category= code for the template works. But I've also found another alternative that we could use to categorize such redirects in the meantime, {{R to help namespace}}. If you want to start up discussion about this let me know, but I think the {{R to help namespace}} template will solve this problem for the time being. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 01:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello

Glad youre back. Do you remember me? —Soap— 13:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Civilization IV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1UP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned templates

Hello. Thank you for removing "deprecated" as a speedy criteria. You say there is no consensus that orphaned should not be a speedy criteria. I had another look, and I see 5 in favor and one making a joke. Perhaps you could have a look again, or explain to me what I am missing. You may post here, I'll watch your talk page. Debresser (talk) 12:40, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

User:Kephir doesn't seem to support the removal of the orphaned template yet, but he may change his mind. Consensus has been pretty clear though for removal of {{db-deprecated}}. Maybe we could ask him to just use G6 (general maintenance) as a speedy tag in the future. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 03:39, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Three editors posted below him and disagree, and two others in other places in the discussion. And even he doesn't seem to be seriously opposed, just would prefer to have a speedy alternative to Tfd for orphaned templates. Debresser (talk) 10:05, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

AN

Hi,

It looks like you've posted twice you latest !vote on AN. Someone not using his real name (talk) 06:38, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

I've just noticed that; I guess MediaWiki's being slow again... TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 06:55, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Derp (hacker group), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twitch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Civilization IV

The article Civilization IV you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Civilization IV for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Darkwarriorblake -- Darkwarriorblake (talk) 17:22, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Cosmo Wright

Hi TCNSPV, you recently detagged the Cosmo wright speedrunner article on the basis that he is a record holder. Firstly, I'm not sure that his record counts. It doesn't appear to be ratified by Guinness, for instance, which I would assume is the usual arbiter in this case? Secondly, the page's author and assorted associates are now attempting to use that article as a wedge to include other speedrunner articles (e.g. Werster) "because other speedrunners have wikis". danno_uk 03:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for contacting me. I detagged the article on the grounds that it does satisfy WP:CSD#A7 which states: "An article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant...may be deleted under this criteria." However, because the article clearly stated that the subject held "the world record for the fastest time completing " it therefore does not fall under the purview of A7. Whether or not his record counts is only relevant to notability; to satisfy the 'claim of significance' criteria, which is a different standard and much lower than notability, all an article has to do is make a claim that the subject is significant in some way, without needing to justify that significance. As I explained to the creator of the article, it may still be deleted due to lack of sourcing to prove its notability. If you wish, you may take it to WP:AFD or use WP:PROD for it. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 03:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Rollback and reviewer userights granted

Hello TeleComNasSprVen. Your account has been granted the "rollback" and "reviewer" user rights. These user rights allow you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and quickly revert the edits of other users.

Rollback user right
Please keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
Reviewer user right
The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:

Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Turkish Wikimedia chapter wiki

I should probably email Vito Genovese about this matter too, though he's been inactive since September of 2013 but I wanted to ask you whether or not you plan on participating any longer in the chapter wiki or that we should leave it up to the stewards to handle requests. Basically, in this edit a fellow steward told me to leave it up to the heads of the chapter wiki, but I do not know exactly who the founder is and whether he/she has the time to manage and take care of the wiki, so instead I have to write to the system-operators of that wiki. Oh by the way, that comment in the thread was regarding this userpage which appeared to be spam, though again I leave it up to your judgments. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 17:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

I deleted that specific page as it was spam (self promotion; potential BLP-vio), I have been quite busy with real-world affairs (mainly my thesis which seems to drag on). Thank you for notifying me though. The wiki and the progress of the chapter isn't ideal but I think both needs time. That said we may wish for an "approval" type registration for the wiki assuming the community approves or perhaps that may be counter productive. -- A Certain White Cat 08:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
@とある白い猫: Sorry for bothering you again, but I think some more spam reappeared on the wiki after that last deletion. Since you seem really busy, do you think you could transfer sysop controls over to me/trwiki admin/global sysop/anyone else that you may trust, so that we can maintain the spam while you're gone? TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 23:17, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
I am right here, I will monitor the site closer as I am done with my work as of 28 February 2014. That said, I do not mind any help but it is not like the site is seeing an overwhelming attack at the moment. -- A Certain White Cat 00:37, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

FYI

A proposal has been made to create a Live Feed to enhance the processing of Articles for Creation and Drafts. See Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC to create a 'Special:NewDraftsFeed' system. Your comments are welcome. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll keep the page watchlisted and read it over but no promises on me commenting, I'm quite busy IRL and on other Wikimedia projects. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 09:48, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Faritz Abdul Hameed

You certainly would have been within your rights to BLPPROD, but a better way is to try and find a source yourself, as I have done, which shows notability per WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 10:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

updated since my last visit

what is this "updated since my last visit" in green that's started to appear on History pages? What makes it happen, and what's the point? It appears next to your recent edit on Misplaced Pages:Village pump (technical). —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

I think that that message simply shows the number of changes by revision entries starting from your last visit to the page. For example, if you viewed Misplaced Pages:Village pump (technical) as it appears on revision 595055757 (found at the top in the URL field) you will see that it has this message: "This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anomalocaris (talk | contribs) at 15:42, 11 February 2014." Now if you closed the tab or window on the page, it will record the changes by revisions that have appeared since you last viewed that revision, so revisions 595059316 and 595106424 will have the green bar highlighted next to them. Perhaps this should be better documented somewhere at Help:Page history, but you can always ask some of the more technically minded people hanging around Misplaced Pages:Village pump (technical) to help explain it to you better. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 09:00, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Your shared-account RFC

I have some ideas about this. Where would you like them: on its talk page, or at WP:VPI? JohnCD (talk) 21:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

You can modify the document directly and note the changes at VPI. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 21:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

FrescoBot on Commons

The bot is back. ;) I updated also the Commons script and I had test it. It took a while, but now it is running. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 08:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 09:42, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conflict-of-interest editing on Misplaced Pages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neutral point of view (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

wm2013:

There's already bugzilla:59157. Deryck C. 14:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll keep that watchlisted from my bugzilla account. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 14:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

You have a message at Simple English Misplaced Pages

Please check simple:User talk:TeleComNasSprVen#Please change your signature and reply there. Thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 06:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

The "Spiral of silence" diagram

"File:TR spiral-of-silence-communication-theory.jpg" → Thank you very much indeed for your endeavour. I know that there is still a gesture of goodwill in the community. --Toksoz (talk) 17:23, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Your 'Speedy Deletion Request' on cy wiki

I've left you a message on cy wp regarding your request. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 05:36, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

AUM Schematic

Thanks for your response over at your talk page on wikimedia commons, I'm a little confused about the way you worded it though. Were you referring ot the original verion of the diagram from the anxiety/uncertainty management pdf? If necessary it'd be fine to use that, I guess. The issue is mostly an aesthetic one from my perspective, I'd hate to be forced to use a low quality, poorly-designed diagram in place of an updated one. What if I were to copy the diagram exactly and declare that it isn't my work? Forgive me for the hassle, I'm new to this and I'm eager to do things through the proper channels, I just don't want to sacrifice article quality wherever possible. Kaolincash (talk) 12:17, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Actually, I think the SVG rendering may be better than the original enough that it does not warrant copyright violation anymore. As such I've pulled the tag. So it's mostly my fault, sorry for the confusion! Basically for copyright law, you want to minimize how close something looks like to another thing, otherwise it looks close to plagiarism. But the SVG might not be the case. If you're still worried about deletion, we can keep a local copy on English Misplaced Pages just in case. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 12:25, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Awesome, thanks! I uploaded a second version just now which is altered a little more (I cleaned up the text, which wasn't rendering well for me, and changed some of the phrasing). Take care, thanks again for your help. Kaolincash (talk) 12:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, TeleComNasSprVen. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 06:34, 23 March 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ed  06:34, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Treaty merger

I'm looking over it now. It was a pretty sloppily executed merger, to be honest -- duplicated categories, reuse of the same photo that appears in the Accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation infobox already, and totally redundant information on the treaty already covered in the Timeline section of the article merged to. As the editor who created the treaty page to begin with, I'm not seeing anything from that article that hasn't been incorporated into the accession page aside from the Wikisource link, and that's easy enough to rectify. If there's something I am missing, please advise. -Kudzu1 (talk) 14:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

FYI, policy is not Misplaced Pages:Verifiability, not truth, only verifiability (and truth is ok!)

Was reading: . Might not matter much there but Misplaced Pages:Verifiability, not truth is an essay about the previous policy (there was a controversy and it was changed). I better be right about this as I changed ] to be in sync with English Misplaced Pages.. comp.arch (talk) 00:33, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

If you think so, but it is only an essay. My take on it is that the "truth" is whatever Misplaced Pages's sources say, not what you think the truth might be. As example, if ten different reliable sources or news stations report that the sky is green, and you think the sky is blue, ultimately Misplaced Pages will say the sky is green. (There are also complications when Misplaced Pages's sources cite Misplaced Pages itself, creating a circular self-reference and thereby creating a "new" truth. We tend to try to avoid those.) TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 00:52, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
It'n not only what I think. This is the policy Misplaced Pages:Verifiability, see note one below. What is true about the essay and previous policy is that the truth is a high bar for many people and would create fear in people about including stuff. But it could also be misunderstood to mean if it's verifiable it doesn't have to be true. Now if stuff is verifiable but turns out to be untrue, I assume that source can be taken out as it is not reliable. comp.arch (talk) 14:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Wditor Review

Hey. Thanks for the review and the kind words. I am thinking of being active again, not sure where to start! --HarshAJ 15:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Unneeded replacement of disqus logo

Why did you replace my upload of the "EXACT" same thing? Without telling my why and leaving a notice for the "orphaned image" on my talk page? You may be busy in real life but you have no problems completely eliminating my contributions to Misplaced Pages. --Kmg90 (talk) 17:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I am confused by what you are trying to say. If your image was deleted, it was probably because it was replaceable non-free media or it was uploaded as a lower resolution version of the original image. According to Misplaced Pages:Non-free content criteria and Misplaced Pages:Criteria for speedy deletion, such non-free images whereby a free equivalent exists and can easily replace, may be subject to deletion. I've poked around your logs and I think that with the Disqus logo, you may want to discuss this with the deleting administrator TLSuda. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 04:44, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
@Kmg90: The image was correctly switched out with a version of the logo which was on Wikimedia Commons (our media repository). We do not need duplicate copies of images or logos, so the version that you uploaded was deleted. Because your version was marked as non-free, the easiest way to process was to deleted it as an orphaned non-free image, although it could have been just as easily speedy deleted as a duplicate image. This is the reason for the notice on your talk page, so that you would be aware of the pending deletion and could resolve any issues.
As a side note, none of your contributions have been "eliminated," rather, all that happened was a differently-named logo was swapped out. If you have any further questions or issues, feel free to bring it to my talk page and I will be happy to work with you. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 21:21, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Tàu listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tàu. Since you had some involvement with the Tàu redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 03:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Procession Under Tuma - Joey L.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Procession Under Tuma - Joey L.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:51, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Enjoy!

Happy Holiday Cheer
Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user an Awesome Holiday and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings! Joys! Paine

Happy Holidays!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello TeleComNasSprVen, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing,
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians

You have been mentioned at Misplaced Pages:Missing Wikipedians. 15:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Marina Inoue seiyū.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marina Inoue seiyū.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Cooperation listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WikiProject Cooperation. Since you had some involvement with the WikiProject Cooperation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mitsuki Saiga seiyū.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mitsuki Saiga seiyū.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of interest editing (article)

FYI. I have a question for you at Conflict-of-interest editing on Misplaced Pages here:

Talk:Conflict-of-interest_editing_on_Wikipedia#Companies_have_argued_for_leeway_with_"ignore_all_rules"

--David Tornheim (talk) 22:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

"Awesome Face" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Awesome Face has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 13 § Awesome Face until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wrong place

Template:Wrong place has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

User talk:TeleComNasSprVen: Difference between revisions Add topic