Misplaced Pages

International sanctions against Iraq: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:26, 7 July 2011 editRewinn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,319 edits Regional-difference-grounded culpability debate: Let's have a balanced presentation: apologists vs. critics; and what about Iraq views?← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:08, 13 December 2024 edit undoKharbaan Ghaltaan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,509 editsNo edit summaryTag: Visual edit 
(686 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|none}}
{{POV|date=June 2011}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2022}}
{{See also|Iraqi no-fly zones}}
]
{{Events leading to the Iraq War}}


The '''Iraq sanctions''' were a near-total financial and trade embargo imposed by the ] on the nation of ]. They began August 6, 1990, four days after ]'s ], stayed largely in force until May 2003 (after ]'s being forced from power),<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/document/2003/0522resolution.htm |title=Resolution 1483 - UN Security Council - Global Policy Forum |publisher=Globalpolicy.org |date= |accessdate=2011-06-01}}</ref> and certain portions including reparations to Kuwait persisting later and through the present.<ref name="bbc.co.uk">{{cite news| title=UN lifts sanctions against Iraq (BBC)| url =http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12004115 | work=BBC News | date=2010-12-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| title=United Nations Security Council Resolution 1956 (December 2010) | url =http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N10/694/83/PDF/N1069483.pdf?OpenElement }}</ref> On 6 August 1990, four days after the ], the ] (UNSC) placed a comprehensive embargo on ]. The sanctions stayed largely in force until 22 May 2003 (after ]'s being forced from power),<ref>{{cite web |title=Resolution 1483 - UN Security Council - Global Policy Forum |url=http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/document/2003/0522resolution.htm |access-date=2011-06-01 |publisher=Globalpolicy.org}}</ref> and persisted in part, including ] to Kuwait.<ref name="bbc.co.uk">{{cite news |date=2010-12-15 |title=UN lifts sanctions against Iraq (BBC) |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12004115}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=United Nations Security Council Resolution 1956 (December 2010) |url=http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N03/368/53/PDF/N0336853.pdf?OpenElement |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100108062452/http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N03/368/53/PDF/N0336853.pdf?OpenElement |archive-date=2010-01-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=2013-06-27 |title=U.N. council brings Iraq closer to end of 1990s sanctions |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iraq-kuwait-un-idUSBRE95Q0Y320130627 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151127225954/http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/27/us-iraq-kuwait-un-idUSBRE95Q0Y320130627 |archive-date=2015-11-27 |access-date=2017-07-01 |work=Reuters}}</ref> The original stated purposes of the sanctions were to compel Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait, to pay reparations, and to disclose and eliminate any ] (WMD).


The UNSC imposed stringent ] on Iraq by adopting and enforcing ] in August 1990.<ref name=r661/> Resolution 661 banned all ] and financial resources with both Iraq and occupied Kuwait except for medicine and "in humanitarian circumstances" foodstuffs, the import of which was tightly regulated.<ref name=r661>{{cite web |url=https://fas.org/news/un/iraq/sres/sres0661.htm |title=UN Security Council Resolution 661 |publisher=Fas.org |access-date=2009-06-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000818054602/https://fas.org/news/un/iraq/sres/sres0661.htm |archive-date=18 August 2000 |url-status=dead}}</ref> In April 1991, following Iraq's defeat in the ], ] lifted the prohibition on foodstuffs, but sanctions remained in effect with revisions, including linkage to removal of weapons of mass destruction.<ref name=r687>{{cite web| title=United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 | url =http://www.mideastweb.org/687.htm }}</ref><ref>{{cite web| title=UN Security Council Resolutions relating to Iraq | url =http://www.casi.org.uk/info/scriraq.html}}</ref>
The original stated purposes of the sanctions were to compel Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait, to pay reparations and to disclose and eliminate any ].


Despite the provisions of ], ], and ], the UN and the Iraqi government could not agree on the terms of an ] (OFFP), which effectively barred Iraqi oil from the world market for several years. When a ] was finally reached in 1996, the resulting OFFP allowed Iraq to resume oil exports in controlled quantities, but the funds were held in ] and the majority of Iraq's purchases had to be individually approved by the "Iraq Sanctions Committee," composed of the ] of the UNSC. (Additionally, some funds were ].) The sanctions regime was continually modified in response to growing international concern over civilian harms attributed to the sanctions; eventually, all limitations on the quantity of Iraqi oil exports were removed (per ]), and a large proportion of Iraqi purchases were pre-approved (per ]), with the exception of those involving ]. In later years, Iraq manipulated the OFFP to generate ] for illegal transactions, while some neighboring countries began to ignore the sanctions entirely, contributing to a modest economic recovery. By reducing food imports, the sanctions appear to have played a role in encouraging Iraq to become more ], although malnutrition among Iraqis was nevertheless reported.
Initially the UN Security Council imposed stringent ] on Iraq through by adopting and enforcing ].<ref name=r661/> After the end of the 1991 ], those sanctions were extended and elaborated on, including linkage to removal of ] (WMD), by ].<ref>{{cite web| title=United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 | url =http://www.mideastweb.org/687.htm }}</ref><ref>{{cite web| title=UN Security Council Resolutions relating to Iraq | url =http://www.casi.org.uk/info/scriraq.html}}</ref> The sanctions banned all ] and financial resources except for medicine and "in humanitarian circumstances" foodstuffs.<ref name=r661>{{cite web|url=http://www.fas.org/news/un/iraq/sres/sres0661.htm |title=UN Security Council Resolution 661 |publisher=Fas.org |date= |accessdate=2009-06-15}}</ref>


During the 1990s and 2000s, many surveys and studies found ] more than doubled during the sanctions,<ref name="IraqWater" /><ref name="Garfield 2000">{{Cite journal |last=Garfield |first=Richard |date=2000-06-01 |title=A multivariate method for estimating mortality rates among children under 5 years from health and social indicators in Iraq |url=https://academic.oup.com/ije/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ije/29.3.510 |journal=International Journal of Epidemiology |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=510–515 |doi=10.1093/ije/29.3.510|pmid=10869324 }}</ref><ref name="IST">{{Cite journal |last1=Ascherio |first1=Alberto |last2=Chase |first2=Robert |last3=Coté |first3=Tim |last4=Dehaes |first4=Godelieave |last5=Hoskins |first5=Eric |last6=Laaouej |first6=Jilali |last7=Passey |first7=Megan |last8=Qaderi |first8=Saleh |last9=Shuqaidef |first9=Saher |last10=Smith |first10=Mary C. |last11=Zaidi |first11=Sarah |date=1992-09-24 |title=Effect of the Gulf War on Infant and Child Mortality in Iraq |url=http://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJM199209243271306 |journal=New England Journal of Medicine |language=en |volume=327 |issue=13 |pages=931–936 |doi=10.1056/NEJM199209243271306 |pmid=1513350 |issn=0028-4793}}</ref> with estimates ranging from 227,000<ref name="Garfield 1999" /> to 500,000<ref name="ICMMS Analysis 2003" /> ] among children under the age of 5. On the other hand, several later surveys conducted in cooperation with the post-Saddam government during the U.S.-led ] have suggested that commonly cited data were doctored by the Saddam Hussein regime and that "there was no major rise in child mortality in Iraq after 1990 and during the period of the sanctions."<ref name="Dyson & Cetorelli 2017">{{Cite journal |last1=Dyson |first1=Tim |last2=Cetorelli |first2=Valeria |date=2017-07-01 |title=Changing views on child mortality and economic sanctions in Iraq: a history of lies, damned lies and statistics |journal=BMJ Global Health |language=en |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=e000311 |doi=10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000311 |issn=2059-7908 |pmc=5717930 |pmid=29225933}}</ref> Nevertheless, sanctions contributed to a significant reduction in Iraq's ], high rates of ], shortages of medical supplies, ]s from ], lengthy ]s, and the near collapse of the ]—especially prior to the introduction of the OFFP.<ref name="IraqWater" /><ref name="Litwak"/><ref name=":0" /> Most UNSC sanctions since the 1990s have been targeted rather than comprehensive, a change partially motivated by concerns that the Iraq sanctions had inflicted disproportionate civilian harm.<ref name="Giumelli 2015">{{cite journal|last=Giumelli|first=Francesco|title=Understanding United Nations targeted sanctions: an empirical analysis|journal=]|publisher=]|volume=91|issue=6|date=November 2015|pages=1351–1368|doi=10.1111/1468-2346.12448|url=https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/99187293/Understanding_United_Nations_targeted_sanctions_an_empirical_analysis.pdf}}</ref>
Estimates of excess civilian deaths during of the sanctions vary widely, but range from 100,000 to over 1.5 million.<ref>See ] and ]</ref>


==Prior calls to sanction Iraq==
==Goals==
The ] generally ] ] during the ], despite Iraq's ] of ]s against post-] ]. In response to reports of ] against its ] minority after the end of the war with Iran, in September 1988 United States (U.S.) ] ] and ] called for comprehensive ] ] against Iraq, including an oil embargo and severe limitations on the export of ]. Although the ensuing legislation passed in the U.S. Senate, it faced strong opposition within the ] and did not become law. Several U.S. commercial interests with ties to Iraq lobbied against sanctions, as did the ], despite ] ]'s public condemnation of Iraq's "unjustified and abhorrent" chemical attacks. According to Pell in October 1988: "Agricultural interests objected to the suspension of taxpayer subsidies for agricultural exports to Iraq; the oil industry protested the oil boycott—although alternative supplies are readily available. Even a chemical company called to inquire how its products might be impacted."<ref>{{cite book|author-link=Elaine Sciolino|last=Sciolino|first=Elaine|title=The Outlaw State: Saddam Hussein's Quest for Power and the Gulf Crisis|publisher=]|year=1991|isbn=9780471542995|page=}}</ref>
The UN Resolutions had the express goals of eliminating weapons of mass destruction and extended-range ballistic missiles, prohibiting any support for ], and forcing Iraq to pay war reparations and all foreign debt.


==Administration==
A non-express goal of the sanctions held by some was the removal of Saddam Hussein. It was openly stated in the ], expressing a sense of the U.S. Congress and signed by President ],<ref>{{cite news|last=Keen |first=Judy |url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2002-08-26-regime_x.htm |title=Code phrase gets retooled for Saddam |publisher=Usatoday.Com |date=2002-08-26 |accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref> that U.S. policy was to "replace that regime" in Iraq,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d105:HR04655:@@@R |title=H.R.4655; Title: Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 |publisher=Thomas.loc.gov |date= |accessdate=2010-06-21}}</ref> to force Hussein from power, an outcome not referenced in the resolutions. And in 1991, Paul Lewis wrote in the New York Times: "Ever since the trade embargo was imposed on Aug. 6, after the invasion of Kuwait, the United States has argued against any premature relaxation in the belief that by making life uncomfortable for the Iraqi people it will eventually encourage them to remove President Saddam Hussein from power."<ref name=NYT1991>{{cite news|last=Lewis |first=Paul |url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE6D7133EF931A15750C0A967958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all |title=After The War; U.N. Survey Calls Iraq'S War Damage Near-Apocalyptic - New York Times |publisher=New York Times |date=1991-03-22 |accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref> The economic sanctions failed to topple Saddam, and may have helped further entrench his rule.<ref name=UE>{{Cite book|title=] |first=Tim |last=Harford |page=213 | year=2007}}</ref>
As described by the ] (UN),<ref name="OFFP Fact Sheet">{{cite web|url=https://www.un.org/Depts/oip/background/fact-sheet.html|title=Fact Sheet |publisher=Office of the Iraq Oil-For-Food Programme |date= 2003-11-21|access-date=2022-03-07 }}</ref> the ] (UNSC) Resolution 661 imposed comprehensive sanctions on Iraq following that country's August 1990 ]. These sanctions included strict limits both on the items that could be imported into Iraq and on those that could be exported.<ref name="us.dept.state">{{cite web|url=http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/pages/iraq.aspx|title=Iraq-Related Sanctions |publisher= ]|access-date=2011-09-19 }}</ref> UN Resolutions ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] expressed the goals of eliminating weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and extended-range ]s, prohibiting any support for ], and forcing Iraq to pay ] and all foreign debt.<ref name=r661/><ref name=r687/>


===Limitations on imports===
American war policy architect ] has argued that the sanctions diminished Iraq militarily, in terms of WMDs, and in its capacity for attacks against its neighbors as its supply lines were cut.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Feith|first=Douglas J.|authorlink=Douglas J. Feith|title=]|publisher=]|year=2008|location=New York|page=193|isbn=0060899735}}</ref> In a 2004 ''Foreign Affairs'' journal article, the scholars ] and ] credit sanctions with: "Compelling Iraq to accept inspections and monitoring; winning concessions from Baghdad on political issue such as the border dispute with Kuwait; preventing the rebuilding of Iraqi defenses after the Persian Gulf War; and blocking the import of vital materials and technologies for producing ]."<ref>{{cite web|last=Cortright |first=David |url=http://www.fourthfreedom.org/Applications/cms.php?page_id=162 |title=Containing Iraq: Sanctions Worked |publisher=Fourthfreedom.org |date=2004-06-19 |accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref> Cortright and Lopez argue that "the much-maligned UN-enforced sanctions regime actually ... helped destroy Saddam Hussein's war machine and his capacity to produce weapons."<ref name=Cortright>{{cite web| first =David| last =Cortright | title =A Hard Look at Iraq Sanctions | url =http://www.thenation.com/article/hard-look-iraq-sanctions?page=full | publisher = ] | month= November | year= 2001 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Cortright |first=David |url=http://www.fourthfreedom.org/Applications/cms.php?page_id=159#bio1 |title=Containing Iraq: Sanctions Worked |publisher=Fourthfreedom.org |date=2001-09-11 |accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref> Hussein told his ] interrogator <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB279/index.htm |title=Saddam Hussein Talks to the FBI |publisher=Gwu.edu |date= |accessdate=2009-07-06}}</ref> that Iraq's armaments "had been eliminated by the UN sanctions."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/01/AR2009070104217.html |title=Saddam Hussein Said WMD Talk Helped Him Look Strong to Iran |publisher=washingtonpost.com |date= 2009-07-02|accessdate=2009-07-06 | first=Glenn | last=Kessler}}</ref>
When the ] (OFFP) allowed Iraq to resume exporting oil in 1996, the resulting revenue was held in ]; Iraq had to ask the "Iraq Sanctions Committee" (i.e., the ] of the UNSC) to individually approve its purchases, with "foodstuffs and certain medical, health and agricultural materials exempt from review" according to the ].<ref name="State.gov GRL"/> (Additionally, some of the revenue was redirected for other purposes, notably reparations to Kuwait.<ref name="OFFP Fact Sheet"/>) In May 2002 the process was streamlined by ], which established a "Goods Review List" for dual-purpose items. From then on, all other Iraqi purchases were automatically approved, while the listed items were reviewed separately.<ref name="State.gov GRL">{{cite web|url=http://2001-2009.state.gov/p/io/rls/fs/2002/10158.htm|title='Goods Review List' for Iraq|publisher=]|date=2002-05-14|accessdate=2022-03-07}}</ref><ref name="In Brief"/><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/09/world/un-plans-soon-to-streamline-application-of-iraq-sanctions.html|title=U.N. Plans Soon to Streamline Application of Iraq Sanctions (Published 2002)|first=Serge|last=Schmemann|work=The New York Times |date=May 9, 2002|via=NYTimes.com}}</ref>


===Enforcement of sanctions===
==Administration==
]Enforcement of the sanctions was primarily by means of military force and legal sanctions. Following the passage of ], a ''Multinational Interception Force'' was organized and led by the U.S. to intercept, inspect and possibly impound vessels, cargoes and crews suspected of carrying freight to or from Iraq.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/mio.htm|title=Maritime Interception Operations (MIO) |publisher=GlobalSecurity.org |access-date=2011-06-08 }}</ref>
As described by the ''United Nations Office of the Iraq Programme'',<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.un.org/Depts/oip/background/fact-sheet.html|title=Fact Sheet |publisher=Office of the Iraq Oil-For-Food Programme |date= 2003-11-21|accessdate=2011-06-07 }}</ref> the United Nations Security Council Resolution 661 imposed comprehensive sanctions on Iraq following that country’s invasion of Kuwait. This sanctions included strict limits both on the items that could be imported into Iraq and on those that could be exported.


The legal side of sanctions included enforcement through actions brought by individual governments. In the U.S., legal enforcement was handled by the ] (OFAC).<ref name="us.dept.state" /> For example, in 2005 OFAC fined ] $20,000 for gifting medicine and other humanitarian supplies to Iraqis without prior acquisition of an export license as required by law.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.democracynow.org/2005/8/16/voices_in_the_wilderness_ordered_to|title=Voices in the Wilderness Ordered to Pay $20K for Bringing Aid to Iraq |publisher=] |date= 2005-08-16|access-date=2011-06-08 }}</ref>
===Limitations on Imports===
The UN Sanctions Committee issue no complete list of items that could not be imported into Iraq. Instead, it evaluated applications for importing items to Iraq on an individual basis, according to UNSC Resolutions allowing only foodstuffs, medicines and products for essential civilian needs.<ref name="ugcs.caltech.edu">{{cite web|url=http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~progress/flyers/banned.html|title=A Partial List of Items Banned From Import Into Iraq by UN Imposed Economic Sanctions |accessdate=2011-06-09 }}</ref>


===Effectiveness===
Persons wishing to deliver items to Iraq, whether in trade or for charitable donation, were required to apply for export licenses to the authorities of individual UN member states, who then sent the application to the Sanctions Committee. The Committee made its decision in secret, and any one Committee member could veto a permission without giving any reason. As a rule, anything that could have a conceivable military use was banned, such as computers, tractors and trousers, although Committee asserted its sole discretion in determining what is essential for every Iraqi and either permitting or denying any thing to the Iraqi population. If the Committee sent its approval, if granted, to the authorities of the country where the application came from, and that country may then inform the applicant who may then ship the items.
There is a general consensus that the sanctions achieved the express goals of limiting Iraqi arms. For example, U.S. Under Secretary of Defense ] says that the sanctions diminished Iraq militarily.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Feith|first=Douglas J.|author-link=Douglas J. Feith|title=War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at the Dawn of the War on Terrorism|publisher=]|year=2008|location=New York|page=|isbn=978-0-06-089973-8|title-link=War and Decision}}</ref> According to scholars ] and ]: "Sanctions compelled Iraq to accept inspections and monitoring and won concessions from Baghdad on political issues such as the border dispute with Kuwait. They also drastically reduced the revenue available to Saddam, prevented the rebuilding of Iraqi defenses after the Persian Gulf War, and blocked the import of vital materials and technologies for producing WMD."<ref>{{cite web |authorlink=David Cortright|last=Cortright |first=David |url=http://www.fourthfreedom.org/Applications/cms.php?page_id=162 |title=Containing Iraq: Sanctions Worked |publisher=Fourthfreedom.org |date=2004-06-19 |access-date=2009-05-30 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070918231620/http://www.fourthfreedom.org/Applications/cms.php?page_id=162 |archive-date=2007-09-18 }}</ref><ref name=Cortright>{{cite journal|authorlink=David Cortright|first=David| last=Cortright | title =A Hard Look at Iraq Sanctions | url =http://www.thenation.com/article/hard-look-iraq-sanctions?page=full | journal = ] |date=November 2001 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |authorlink=David Cortright|last=Cortright |first=David |url=http://www.fourthfreedom.org/Applications/cms.php?page_id=159#bio1 |title=Containing Iraq: Sanctions Worked |publisher=Fourthfreedom.org |date=2001-09-11 |access-date=2009-05-30 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100310131950/http://www.fourthfreedom.org/Applications/cms.php?page_id=159#bio1 |archive-date=2010-03-10 }}</ref> Saddam told his ] (FBI) interrogator<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB279/index.htm |title=Saddam Hussein Talks to the FBI |publisher=Gwu.edu |access-date=2009-07-06}}</ref> that Iraq's armaments "had been eliminated by the UN sanctions."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/01/AR2009070104217.html |title=Saddam Hussein Said WMD Talk Helped Him Look Strong to Iran |newspaper=] |date= 2009-07-02|access-date=2009-07-06 | first=Glenn | last=Kessler|author-link=Glenn Kessler (journalist)}}</ref>


===Limitations on Exports and the Oil For Food Programme=== ==Oil-for-Food Programme==
{{Main|Oil-for-Food Programme}}
Limitations on Iraqi exports (chiefly oil) made it difficult to fund the import of goods into Iraq. Following the 1991 Gulf War, a United Nations inter-agency mission assessed that ''"the Iraqi people may soon face a further imminent catastrophe, which could include epidemic and famine, if massive life-supporting needs are not rapidly met."'' The Government of Iraq declined offers (in UNSRC resolutions 706 and 712) to enable Iraq to sell limited quantities of oil to meet its people's needs.
As the humanitarian impact of the sanctions became a matter of international concern,<ref>See .</ref> several UN resolutions were introduced that allowed Iraq to trade its oil for approved goods such as food and medicine. The earliest of these, ] of 15 August 1991, allowed the sale of Iraqi oil in exchange for food,<ref name="State.gov GRL"/> which was reaffirmed by ] in September 1991. The UN states that "The Government of Iraq declined these offers".<ref name="OFFP Fact Sheet"/> As a result, Iraq was effectively barred from exporting oil to the world market for several years.<ref name="State.gov GRL"/>
Acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, the Security Council established the ] Programme via resolution 986 on 14 April 1995 as intended a ''"temporary measure to provide for the humanitarian needs of the Iraqi people, until the fulfillment by Iraq of the relevant Security Council resolutions..."''.
Implementation of the Programme started in December 1996; its first shipment of supplies arrived in March 1997. The Programme was funded exclusively with the proceeds from Iraqi oil exports. At first, Iraq was permitted to sell $2 billion worth of oil every six months, with two-thirds of that amount to be used to meet Iraq’s humanitarian needs. In 1998, the limit was raised to $5.26 billion every six months. In December 1999, the Security Council removed the limit on the amount of oil exported.


{| style="width: 35%; height:30px" border="1" align="right"
===Allocation of Export Proceeds===
|+ '''Iraqi ], 1990–2003, per ]'''<ref>{{cite web|url=https://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/CountryProfile|title=National Accounts—Analysis of Main Aggregates (AMA): Country Profile|publisher=], Statistics Division, National Accounts Section|accessdate=2022-03-05}}</ref>
Iraqi oil export proceeds were allocated as follows:
|-
* 72% was allocated to the humanitarian Programme
| 1990 || $1,371
* 25% was allocated to the Compensation Fund for war reparation payments
|-
* 2.2% for United Nations administrative and operational costs
| 1991 || $467
* 0.8% for the weapons inspection programme.
|-
| 1992 || $537
|-
| 1993 || $372
|-
| 1994 || $289
|-
| 1995 || $241
|-
| 1996 || $410
|-
| 1997 || $435
|-
| 1998 || $538
|-
| 1999 || $910
|-
| 2000 || $1,006
|-
| 2001 || $1,022
|-
| 2002 || $978
|-
| 2003 || $903
|-
|}


In April 1995, an ] (OFFP) was formally created under ], but the resolution could not be implemented until Iraq signed a ] (MOU) with the UN in May 1996. Under the OFFP, the UN states that "Iraq was permitted to sell $2 billion worth of oil every six months, with two-thirds of that amount to be used to meet Iraq's humanitarian needs. In 1998, the limit on the level of Iraqi oil exports&nbsp;... was raised to $5.26 billion every six months, again with two-thirds of the oil proceeds to be earmarked to meet the humanitarian needs of the Iraqi people."<ref name="OFFP Fact Sheet"/> In later iterations of the OFFP (pursuant to the December 1999 ]), there were no restrictions on Iraq's oil exports and the share of revenue allocated to humanitarian relief increased to 72%;<ref name="OFFP Fact Sheet"/><ref>{{cite web|author-link=Barbara Crossette|last=Crossette|first=Barbara|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1999/12/18/world/divided-un-council-approves-new-iraq-arms-inspection-plan.html?pagewanted=1|title=Divided U.N. Council Approves New Iraq Arms Inspection Plan|work=]|date=1999-12-18|accessdate=2022-03-08}}</ref> 25% of the proceeds (which were held in ]<ref name="State.gov GRL"/>) were redirected to a ], and 3% to UN programs related to Iraq.<ref name="OFFP Fact Sheet"/> The first shipments of food arrived in March 1997, with medicines following in May 1997.<ref name="In Brief">{{cite web|url=http://www.un.org/Depts/oip/background/inbrief.html|title=In Brief |publisher=Office of the Iraq Oil-For-Food Programme |date= 2003-11-21|access-date=2022-03-07 }}</ref> The UN recounts that "Over the life of the Programme, the Security Council expanded its initial emphasis on food and medicines to include infrastructure rehabilitation".<ref name="OFFP Fact Sheet"/> The UN, rather than the Iraqi government, administered the OFFP in Iraq's ].<ref name="OFFP Fact Sheet"/>
Of the 72% allocated to humanitarian purposes:
* 59% was earmarked for the contracting of supplies and equipment by the Government of Iraq for the 15 central and southern governorates.
* 13% for the three northern governorates, where the United Nations implemented the Programme on behalf of the Government of Iraq.


While the OFFP is credited with improving the conditions of the population, it was not free from controversy. The U.S. State Department criticized the Iraqi government for inadequately spending the money.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://usinfo.org/wf-archive/2001/010126/epf505.htm |title=Department of State Washington File: Fact Sheet: U.S. Department of State on Iraqi Underspending |publisher=Usinfo.org |access-date=2009-06-22}}</ref> In 2004–2005, the OFFP became the subject of major media attention over ], as allegations surfaced that Iraq had systematically sold oil vouchers at below-market prices in return for some of the proceeds from the resale outside the scope of the programme; ]. In 2005, a UN ] led by ] found that the director of the OFFP, ], personally accepted $147,184 in bribes from Saddam's government, which Sevan denied.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4131602.stm|title=Oil-for-food chief 'took bribes'|work=]|date=2005-08-08|accessdate=2022-03-07}}</ref>
===Enforcement of Sanctions===
Enforcement of the sanctions was primarily by means of military force and legal sanctions. A ''Multinational Interception Force'' was organized and lead by the United States to intercept, inspect and possibly impound vessels, cargoes and crews suspected of carrying freight to or from Iraq.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/mio.htm|title=Maritime Interception Operations (MIO) |publisher=GlobalSecurity.org |accessdate=2011-06-08 }}</ref> While the UN Sanctions Committee did not issue a complete list of items banned from import to Iraq,<ref name="ugcs.caltech.edu"/> among the imports intercepted by the MIF were shipments of pencils, hubcaps and brassieres.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/irsannz.htm|title=Iraq sanctions - NZ's role |accessdate=2011-06-09 }}</ref>


By the late 1990s, the Iraqi economy showed signs of modest growth, which would continue until 2003: Iraq's ] increased from US$10.8 billion in 1996 to US$30.8 billion in 2000. The OFFP was the major factor in this growth, as it led to the inflow of ], which helped reduce inflation. (Another factor was illegal transactions, as many countries began to simply ignore the sanctions.) While internal and external trade was revitalized, this did not lead to a significant increase in the standard of living for the majority of the population; on the contrary, the government tried to prevent benefits from flowing to Shi'ite areas in southern Iraq to persuade more countries to oppose the sanctions. In 2000, the ] was estimated to be US$1,000—less than half of what it had been in 1990, according to ].<ref name="Litwak">{{cite book|authorlink=Robert Litwak|last=Litwak|first=Robert|title=Regime Change: U.S. Strategy through the Prism of 9/11|publisher=]|year=2007|isbn=978-0-8018-8642-3|pages=-}}</ref>
The legal side of sanctions were enforcement through actions brought by individual governments. In the United States, legal enforcement was handled by the ] (OFAC). For example, in 2005 OFAC fined ] $20,000 for gifting medicine and other humanitarian supplies to Iraqis.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.democracynow.org/2005/8/16/voices_in_the_wilderness_ordered_to|title=Voices in the Wilderness Ordered to Pay $20K for Bringing Aid to Iraq |publisher=Democracy Now! |date= 2005-08-16|accessdate=2011-06-08 }}</ref> In a similar case, OFAC is still attempting to collect (as of 2011) a $10,000 fine, plus interest, against Bert Sacks for bringing medicine to residents of ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iraqikids.org/berts-case/timeline|title=Timeline |publisher=Fined For Helping Iraqi Kids |accessdate=2011-06-08 }}</ref>


==Effects on the Iraqi people during sanctions== ==Effects on the Iraqi people during sanctions==
High rates of malnutrition, lack of medical supplies, and diseases from lack of clean water were reported during sanctions;<ref>{{cite web|author=G.R. Popal |url=http://www.emro.who.int/publications/emhj/0604/20.htm |title= High rates of malnutrition, lack of medical supplies, and diseases from lack of clean water were reported during the sanctions.<ref>{{cite journal|author=G.R. Popal |url=http://www.emro.who.int/publications/emhj/0604/20.htm |title= Impact of sanctions on the population of Iraq |journal=Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal |date= July 2000|volume=6 |issue=4 |pages=791–5 |doi=10.26719/2000.6.4.791 |pmid=11794085 |s2cid=29571181 |access-date=2011-06-03|doi-access=free }}</ref> In 2001, the chairman of the Iraqi Medical Association's scientific committee sent a plea to '']'' to help it raise awareness of the disastrous effects the sanctions were having on the Iraqi healthcare system.<ref>{{Cite journal |author= Adnan Al-Araji |year= 2001 |title= Iraqi doctors appeal for help from doctors in other countries |journal= ] |volume= 323 |issue= 7303 |pages= 53 |jstor= 25467323 |pmc=1120689|doi=10.1136/bmj.323.7303.53/b |pmid=11464839}}</ref>
Impact of sanctions on the population of Iraq |publisher=Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal|date= July 2000|accessdate=2011-06-03}}</ref> at least some of which results were anticipated in advance of the imposition of sanctions.<ref name=iwtv>{{cite web
|title =Iraq Water Treatment Vulnerabilities
|url =http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/declassdocs/dia/19950901/950901_511rept_91.html
|publisher = Office of the Special Assistant for Gulf War Illnesses, United States Department of Defense
|date= November/December 2001
|accessdate =2011-06-05 | deadurl=no}}</ref>


In January 1991, the U.S. ] (DIA) prepared a detailed study of Iraq’s water treatment system. Titled "Iraq Water Treatment Vulnerabilities," the DIA study noted that Iraq's water treatment system was particularly vulnerable to sanctions, noting that "it probably will take at least six months (to June 1991) before the system is fully degraded," as supply levels of crucial water treatment chemicals such as ] and ] were "known to be critically low" and their "mportation been embargoed." The study thus predicted an increase in disease and even "epidemics of such diseases as ], ], and ]" if the sanctions remained in place.<ref name= IraqWater>{{Cite journal |last1=MacQueen |first1=Graeme |last2=Nagy |first2=Thomas |last3=Santa Barbara |first3=Joanna |last4=Raichle |first4=Claudia |date=2004 |title='Iraq Water Treatment Vulnerabilities': a challenge to public health ethics |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15260175/ |journal=Medicine, Conflict and Survival |volume=20 |issue=2 |pages=109–119 |doi=10.1080/1362369042000234708 |issn=1362-3699 |pmid=15260175}}</ref> The percentage of Iraqis with access to clean drinking water dropped from an estimated 90 per cent in 1990 to 41 per cent in 1999.<ref name= IraqWater />
The modern Iraqi economy had been highly dependent on oil exports: In 1989, the oil sector comprised 61% of the GNP. A major drawback of this over-dependence has been the narrowing of the economic base during the last three decades, with the agricultural sector rapidly declining in the 1970s. So some claim that the post-1990 sanctions had a particularly devastating effect on Iraq’s economy and food security levels of the population.<ref name="unicef_eval_2003">{{cite web|url=http://www.unicef.org/evaldatabase/index_29697.html |title=UNICEF Evaluation report 2003 IRQ: Iraq Watching Briefs — Overview Report, July 2003 |publisher=Unicef.org |date=2007-04-09 |accessdate=2009-06-15}}</ref>


In 1993, the UN ] (FAO) reported that the sanctions "have virtually paralyzed the whole economy and generated persistent deprivation, chronic hunger, endemic undernutrition, massive unemployment and widespread human suffering."<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Fineman |first=Mark |date=1993-08-08 |title=Iraq on Brink of Famine, U.N. Finds : Destitution: Sanctions are blamed. Studies liken nation to 'disaster-stricken African countries.' |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1993-08-08-mn-21835-story.html |website=] |language=}}</ref> ], the UN ] in ], Iraq, resigned in October 1998 resigned after a 34-year career with the UN in order to have the freedom to criticise the sanctions regime, saying "I don't want to administer a programme that satisfies the definition of ]."<ref>] '']'', 4 October 2004</ref> However, Sophie Boukhari, a ] Courier journalist, reports that "some legal experts are skeptical about or even against using such terminology" and quotes Mario Bettati for the view that "People who talk like that don't know anything about law. The embargo has certainly affected the Iraqi people badly, but that's not at all a ] or genocide."<ref>Sophie Boukhari UNESCO website.</ref>
Shortly after the sanctions were imposed, the Iraqi government developed a system of free food rations consisting of 1000 calories per person/day or 40% of the daily requirements, which an estimated 60% of the population relied on for a vital part of their sustenance. With the introduction of the ] in 1997, this situation gradually improved. In May 2000 a United Nations Children's Fund (]) survey noted that almost half the children under 5 years suffered from diarrhoea, in a country where the population is marked by its youth, with 45% being under 14 years of age in 2000. Power shortages, lack of spare parts and insufficient technical know-how lead to the breakdown of many modern facilities.<ref name="unicef_eval_2003" />


Halliday's successor, ], subsequently also resigned in protest, calling the effects of the sanctions a "true human tragedy".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/middle_east/642189.stm|title=BBC News - MIDDLE EAST - UN sanctions rebel resigns|work=bbc.co.uk}}</ref> Jutta Burghardt, head of the ] in Iraq, followed them.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Neilan|first1=Terence|title=WORLD BRIEFING|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2000/02/16/world/world-briefing.html|website=The New York Times|access-date=24 December 2016|date=16 February 2000}} See also {{cite web|title=Corrections|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2000/02/17/nyregion/c-corrections-869384.html|website=The New York Times|date=17 February 2000|access-date=24 December 2016}}</ref>
The overall literacy rate in Iraq had been 78% in 1977 and 87% for adult women by 1985, but declined rapidly since then. Between 1990 and 1998, over one fifth of Iraqi children stopped enrolling in school, consequently increasing the number of non-literates and losing all the gains made in the previous decade. The 1990s also saw a dramatic increase in child labor, from a virtually non-existent level in the 1980s. The per capita income in Iraq dropped from $3510 in 1989 to $450 in 1996, heavily influenced by the rapid devaluation of the Iraqi dinar.<ref name="unicef_eval_2003" />


===Impact on agriculture===
Iraq had been one of the few countries in the ] that invested in women’s education. But this situation changed from the late eighties on with increasing militarisation and a declining economic situation. Consequently the economic hardships and war casualties in the last decades have increased the number of women-headed households and working women.<ref name="unicef_eval_2003" />
Throughout the Ba'ath Party's rule over Iraq, the agricultural sector had been under-performing. Those in the U.S. who supported sanctions believed that low agricultural production in Iraq (coupled with sanctions) would lead to "a hungry population", and "a hungry population was an unruly one".<ref>{{cite book|last=Selden|first=Zachary|title=Economic Sanctions as Instruments of American Foreign Policy|publisher=]|year=1999|isbn=978-0-275-96387-3|pages=-}}</ref> The Iraqi government, which understood the serious effects the sanctions could have on Iraq, was able to increase agricultural output by 24 percent from 1990 to 1991. During the sanction years, the agricultural sector witnessed "a boom of unprecedented proportions". Iraq's ] (RCC) introduced several decrees during this period to increase agricultural performance. These decrees may be separated into three categories:
*They introduced severe penalties on farmers (or landowners) unable to produce at full capacity on their land.
*Government programs made it cheaper (and therefore more profitable for farmers and landowners) to produce.
*Programs were initiated to increase the amount of ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Selden|first=Zachary|title=Economic Sanctions as Instruments of American Foreign Policy|publisher=]|year=1999|isbn=978-0-275-96387-3|page=}}</ref>


The RCC introduced Decree No. 367 in 1990, which stated that all lands which were not under production by their owners would be taken over by the state; if the owner could not use all of the land he owned, he would lose it. However, the RCC's policy was not "all stick and no carrot". The government made it easier for farmers and landowners to receive credit. On 30 September 1990, the ] announced that it would increase loans to farmers by 100&nbsp;percent, and would subsidize machinery and tools. In October 1990, the RCC stated it was planning to utilize and exploit "every inch of Iraqi arable land". While official statistics cannot be trusted entirely, they showed massive growth in arable land: from 16,446 ] in 1980 to 45,046 donums in 1990.<ref>{{cite book|last=Selden|first=Zachary|title=Economic Sanctions as Instruments of American Foreign Policy|publisher=]|year=1999|isbn=978-0-275-96387-3|page=}}</ref> In turn, irrigation projects were launched to meet the increased demand for water in Iraq's agricultural sector.<ref>{{cite book|last=Selden|first=Zachary|title=Economic Sanctions as Instruments of American Foreign Policy|publisher=]|year=1999|isbn=978-0-275-96387-3|page=}}</ref> The increase in agricultural output does not mean that hunger was not widespread; prices of foodstuffs increased dramatically during this period. However, overall the sanctions failed and (indirectly) led to an unprecedented improvement in agriculture, creating a constituency of farmers in central Iraq who had a vested interest in the sanctions remaining in effect. Data from 1990 is also consistent with the observation that destruction wrought by the 1991 Gulf War may be more responsible than the sanctions themselves for reducing Iraq's capacity to increase food production further.<ref>{{cite book|last=Selden|first=Zachary|title=Economic Sanctions as Instruments of American Foreign Policy|publisher=]|year=1999|isbn=978-0-275-96387-3|page=}}</ref>
Researcher ] estimated that "a minimum of 100,000 and a more likely estimate of 227,000 excess deaths among young children from August 1991 through March 1998" from all causes including sanctions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.casi.org.uk/info/garfield/dr-garfield.html |title=Morbidity and Mortality Among Iraqi Children |publisher=Casi.org.uk |date= |accessdate=2009-06-15}}</ref> Other estimates have ranged as low as 170,000 children.<ref name=Cortright/><ref name=Welch2002>{{cite web|url=http://reason.com/archives/2002/03/01/the-politics-of-dead-children |title=Reason Magazine - The Politics of Dead Children |publisher=Reason.com |date= |accessdate=2010-10-06 |first=Matt |last=Welch |authorlink=Matt Welch}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.comw.org/pda/0310rm8.html#N_93_ |title=The Wages of War: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 2003 Conflict. PDA Research Monograph 8, 20 October 2003. Carl Conetta |publisher=Comw.org |date= |accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref> UNICEF Executive Director Carol Bellamy said that<blockquote>if the substantial reduction in child mortality throughout Iraq during the 1980s had continued through the 1990s, there would have been half a million fewer deaths of children under-five in the country as a whole during the eight year period 1991 to 1998. As a partial explanation, she pointed to a March statement of the Security Council Panel on Humanitarian Issues which states: "Even if not all suffering in Iraq can be imputed to external factors, especially sanctions, the Iraqi people would not be undergoing such deprivations in the absence of the prolonged measures imposed by the Security Council and the effects of war."
<ref name=unicef99> ] Newsline August 12, 1999</ref></blockquote>


Joseph Sassoon commented on Iraq's successful use of food ] to mitigate the effects of sanctions and war, suggesting that Iraq's government was not wholly lacking in competence or efficiency despite being portrayed as such by critics.<ref name="Sassoon 2017">{{cite journal|last=Sassoon|first=Joseph|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-middle-east-studies/article/aaron-m-faust-the-bathification-of-iraq-saddam-husseins-totalitarianism-austin-tex-university-of-texas-press-2015-pp-296-5500-cloth-isbn-9781477305577/3E2A3E4D523556848C0E24AC9318B019|title=Aaron M. Faust, ''The Ba'thification of Iraq: Saddam Hussein's Totalitarianism'' |journal=]|volume=49|issue=1|date=February 2017|publisher=]|pages=205–206|doi=10.1017/S0020743816001392|s2cid=164804585 }}</ref>
] is commonly used to ], but because it can also be used to make poisonous chlorine gas, the sanctions regime included banning its manufacture under any conditions throughout Iraq and its import severely restricted.<ref name=pike>{{cite web|author=John Pike |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iraq/fallujah_2.htm |title=Fallujah II / Habbaniyah II - Iraq Special Weapons Facilities |publisher=Globalsecurity.org |date= |accessdate=2010-12-21}}{{Verify credibility|date=June 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.i-p-o.org/sanctpap.htm |title=Hans Koechler (ed.), ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT - Studies in International Relations, XXIII - Vienna: International Progress Organization, 1997 |publisher=I-p-o.org |year=1997 |accessdate=2010-12-21}}</ref> Department of Defense studies indicated a high likelihood that this would result in many civilian deaths.<ref name=iwtv /> David Sole, of the Detroit Water & Sewerage Department, argued that because high rates of diseases from lack of clean water followed the ] and sanctions, liquid ] should be sent to Iraq to ].<ref name=iacenter>{{cite web|author=David Sole |url=http://web.archive.org/web/20081203113830/http://www.iacenter.org/iraqchallenge/water.htm |title=A Call For Emergency Chlorine Shipments To Iraqi |publisher=Iacenter.org (Wayback Machine) |date=1998-05-12 |accessdate=2011-06-01}}</ref>


===Estimates of excess deaths due to sanctions===
] was appointed United Nations Humanitarian Coordinator in Baghdad, Iraq as of 1 September 1997, at the Assistant Secretary-General level. In October 1998 he resigned after a 34 year career with the UN in order to have the freedom to criticise the sanctions regime, saying "I don't want to administer a programme that satisfies the definition of ]"<ref>John Pilger on why we ignored Iraq in the 1990s] ], 4 October 2004</ref> However Sophie Boukhari a UNESCO Courier journalist reports that "Some legal experts are skeptical about or even against using such terminology." and quotes Mario Bettati (who invented the notion of "the right of humanitarian intervention") "People who talk like that don’t know anything about law. The embargo has certainly affected the Iraqi people badly, but that’s not at all a crime against humanity or genocide." and reports that ] the secretary-general of ] said "one of the key elements of a crime against humanity and of genocide is intent. The embargo wasn’t imposed because the United States and Britain wanted children to die. If you think so, you have to prove it."<ref>Sophie Boukhari UNESCO website.</ref>
During the 1990s and 2000s, many surveys and studies concluded that ] in Iraq—specifically among children under the age of 5—greatly increased during the sanctions at varying degrees.<ref name="IraqWater" /><ref name="Garfield 2000">{{Cite journal |last=Garfield |first=Richard |date=2000-06-01 |title=A multivariate method for estimating mortality rates among children under 5 years from health and social indicators in Iraq |url=https://academic.oup.com/ije/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ije/29.3.510 |journal=International Journal of Epidemiology |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=510–515 |doi=10.1093/ije/29.3.510|pmid=10869324 }}</ref><ref name="IST">{{Cite journal |last1=Ascherio |first1=Alberto |last2=Chase |first2=Robert |last3=Coté |first3=Tim |last4=Dehaes |first4=Godelieave |last5=Hoskins |first5=Eric |last6=Laaouej |first6=Jilali |last7=Passey |first7=Megan |last8=Qaderi |first8=Saleh |last9=Shuqaidef |first9=Saher |last10=Smith |first10=Mary C. |last11=Zaidi |first11=Sarah |date=1992-09-24 |title=Effect of the Gulf War on Infant and Child Mortality in Iraq |url=http://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJM199209243271306 |journal=New England Journal of Medicine |language=en |volume=327 |issue=13 |pages=931–936 |doi=10.1056/NEJM199209243271306 |pmid=1513350 |issn=0028-4793}}</ref> On the other hand, several later surveys conducted in cooperation with the post-Saddam government during the U.S.-led ] "all put the U5MR in Iraq during 1995–2000 in the vicinity of 40 per 1000," suggesting that "there was no major rise in child mortality in Iraq after 1990 and during the period of the sanctions."<ref name="Dyson & Cetorelli 2017" /><ref name="Spagat" />


In 1991, the International Study Team (IST) conducted an independent nationally representative household survey and found that mortality among children under the age of 5 increased from 43.2 deaths per 1000 births prior to ] to 128.5 deaths per 1000 births during the first eight months of 1991; when extrapolated, this accounted for approximately 46,900 excess deaths from January to August 1991.<ref name="IST" /> In 1995, the UN ] (FAO) conducted a small survey<ref name="Dyson & Cetorelli 2017" /> representative of Baghdad's neighbourhoods and reported that the under-5 child mortality rate had increased to 206 per 1000 births by August 1995; extrapolating approximately 567,000 deaths of children under the age of 5.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Zaidi |first1=S. |last2=Fawzi |first2=M. C. |date=1995-12-02 |title=Health of Baghdad's children |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7491002/ |journal=Lancet |volume=346 |issue=8988 |pages=1485 |doi=10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92499-x |issn=0140-6736 |pmid=7491002}}</ref> However, when Sarah Zaidi—one of the study's coauthors—carried out follow-up surveys and reinterviews in 1996 and 1997: "65 deaths recorded in 1995 were not reported in 1996, and nine recorded in 1996 were not reported in 1995"; of 26 women interviewed in 1995 and 1997, "Nine child deaths that had been recorded in 1995 but not in 1996 were confirmed ... 13 were not confirmed, and four miscarriages and stillbirths were found to have been mistakenly recorded as deaths in 1995." Moreover, the results of the 1996 survey (38 deaths per 1000 births) was less than one-fifth that of the 1995 survey (206 deaths per 1000 births), leading Zaidi to conclude that "an accurate estimate of child mortality in Iraq probably lies between the two surveys."<ref name="Zaidi 1997">{{cite journal|title=Child mortality in Iraq|url=http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2805%2970470-0/fulltext|journal=]|volume=350|issue=9084|page=1105|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(05)70470-0|pmid=10213580|year=1997|last1=Zaidi|first1=Sarah|s2cid=46466831}}</ref> Zaidi later told Michael Spagat: "My guess is that 'some' Iraqi surveyors recorded deaths when they did not take place or the child had died outside the time frame but they specified the opposite."<ref name="Spagat" /> Nevertheless, epidemiologist ] writes that the Baghdad studies "cannot be used as a national estimate because, as in most developing countries, mortality is likely to be higher outside the capital city," and projects that "Assuming that a quarter of all under 5s live in Baghdad, the 1996 mortality estimate would project to a national rate in the range 47–100" deaths per 1000 births.<ref name="Garfield 2000" />
Halliday's successor, ], subsequently also resigned in protest, calling the effects of the sanctions a "true human tragedy".<ref></ref> Jutta Burghardt, head of the ] in Iraq, followed them.


In 1999, Garfield—utilizing a ] and "Information from twenty-two field studies, including data from thirty-six nutritional assessments ... demographic estimates from nine sources, three Iraqi government reports, ten UN-related reports, and eighteen press and research reports," as well as "four large, well designed and managed studies examining death rates among children from 1988 through 1998"—estimates that from 1991 to 1996, deaths among children under 5 reached, at a minimum, 80 per 1000 births; by March 1998, a likely 227,000 excess deaths among children under 5 had occurred, "an average of about 60 excess deaths each day."<ref name="Garfield 2000" /><ref name="Garfield 1999">{{Cite news |last=Garfield |first=Richard |date=1999 |title=Morbidity and Mortality among Iraqi Children from 1990 through 1998: Assessing the Impact of the Gulf War and Economic Sanctions |url=https://reliefweb.int/report/iraq/morbidity-and-mortality-among-iraqi-children-1990-through-1998-assessing-impact-gulf-war |work=] & Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, ]}}</ref> In 2000, Garfield, citing new data, recalculated his estimate to 350,000 excess deaths.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Cortright |first=David |date=15 November 2001 |title=A Hard Look at Iraq Sanctions |url=https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/hard-look-iraq-sanctions/ |access-date= |work=]}}</ref>
===Estimates of deaths during sanctions===
Estimates of excess deaths during sanctions vary depending on the source. The estimates vary <ref name=unicef99/><ref name="atrocities1997">, list of minor conflicts and casualty claims with sources 1899-1997</ref> due to differences in methodologies, and specific time-frames covered.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.casi.org.uk/info/unicef/990816qa.html |title=UNICEF: Questions and answers for the Iraq child mortality surveys |publisher=Casi.org.uk |date= |accessdate=2009-06-15}}</ref> A short listing of estimates follows:
* ]: 500,000 children (including sanctions, collateral effects of war). " hildren under 5 years of age are dying at more than twice the rate they were ten years ago."<ref name=unicef99/><ref> 16 August 1999</ref>
* Former U.N. Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq ]: "Two hundred thirty-nine thousand children 5 years old and under" as of 1998.<ref name="Michael Powell 1998">{{cite news|author=Michael Powell |url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/37257998.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Dec+17%2C+1998&author=Michael+Powell&pub=The+Washington+Post&edition=&startpage=E.01&desc=The+Deaths+He+Cannot+Sanction%3B+Ex-U.N.+Worker+Details+Harm+to+Iraqi+Children |archiveurl=http://www.public.asu.edu/~wellsda/foreignpolicy/Halliday-criticizes-sanctions.html |archivedate=unknown |title=U.N. worker details harm |publisher=Washington Post |accessdate=2010-07-22 |date=1998-12-17}}</ref>
* Iraqi ] government: 1.5 million.<ref name=Welch2002/>
* Iraqi Cultural Minister Hammadi: 1.7 million (includes sanctions, bombs and other weapons, depleted uranium poisoning) <ref> 10. May 2001</ref>
* "probably ... 170,000 children", Project on Defense Alternatives, "The Wages of War", 20. October 2003<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.comw.org/pda/0310rm8.html#N_93_ |title=The Wages of War: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 2003 Conflict. PDA Research Monograph 8, 20 October 2003. Carl Conetta |publisher=Comw.org |date= |accessdate=2009-06-16}}</ref>
* 350,000 excess deaths among children "even using conservative estimates", Slate Explainer, "Are 1 Million Children Dying in Iraq?", 9. October 2001.<ref>{{cite web|author=Chris Suellentrop |url=http://slate.msn.com/?id=1008414 |title=Are 1 Million Children Dying in Iraq? - Chris Suellentrop - Slate Magazine |publisher=Slate.msn.com |date=2001-10-09 |accessdate=2009-06-22}}</ref>
*Economist Michael Spagat: "very likely to be than half a million children." He claims that these estimates are unable to isolate the effects of sanctions alone due to the lack of "anything resembling a controlled experiment".<ref name=Spagat/><ref name=Spagat/>
*"], a ] nursing professor ... cited the figures 345,000-530,000 for the entire 1990-2002 period"<ref name=ds03>{{cite web|url= http://www.tricare.mil/eenews/downloads/lebanon.doc |title=The Iraqi babies scam is still alive |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20030904174428/http://www.dailystar.com.lb/opinion/03_09_03_c.asp |archivedate=2003-09-04 }}</ref> for sanctions-related excess deaths.<ref name=NP02/>
*Zaidi, S. and Fawzi, M. C. S., ] (1995, estimate withdrawn in 1997):567,000 children.<ref name=Spagat/>
* Editor (then "associate editor and media columnist") ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://reason.com/staff/show/134.html |title=Staff > Matt Welch - Reason Magazine |publisher=Reason.com |date=2008-12-02 |accessdate=2009-06-22}}</ref> ], 2002: "It seems awfully hard not to conclude that the embargo on Iraq has ... contributed to more than 100,000 deaths since 1990."<ref name=Welch2002/><ref name=NP02>{{cite web|author=Matt Welch |url=http://mattwelch.com/NatPostSave/Sanctions.htm |title=Iraqi death toll doesn't add up |publisher=] |year=2002 |accessdate=2009-06-10}}</ref>
* Former U.S. Attorney General ]: 1.5 million (includes sanctions, bombs and other weapons, depleted uranium poisoning).<ref>(The Wisdom Fund, 20. November 1996)</ref>
* British Member of Parliament ]: "a million Iraqis, most of them children."<ref> 17 May 2005</ref>


Later on in 1999, the UN ] (UNICEF) published a study called the "Iraq Child and Maternal Mortality Survey" (ICMMS). Using survey data from nearly 40,000 households collated in cooperation with Iraqi government and autonomous ] field workers, the ICMMS found that Iraq's under-5 child mortality rate increased from 56 deaths per 1000 births (during 1984–1989) to 131 deaths per 1000 births (during 1994–1999),<ref name="ICMMS Analysis 2000">{{Cite journal |last1=Ali |first1=Mohamed M |last2=Shah |first2=Iqbal H |date=2000-05-27 |title=Sanctions and childhood mortality in Iraq |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140673600022893 |journal=The Lancet |volume=355 |issue=9218 |pages=1851–1857 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02289-3 |pmid=10866440 |issn=0140-6736}}</ref><ref name="ICMMS Analysis 2003">{{Cite journal |last1=Blacker |first1=John |last2=Jones |first2=Gareth |last3=Ali |first3=Mohamed M. |date=2003 |title=Annual mortality rates and excess deaths of children under five in Iraq, 1991-98 |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12888415/ |journal=Population Studies |volume=57 |issue=2 |pages=217–226 |doi=10.1080/0032472032000097119 |issn=0032-4728 |pmid=12888415}}</ref><ref name="fas990812">{{cite web |title=UNICEF—Results of the 1999 Iraq Child and Maternal Mortality Surveys |url=https://fas.org/news/iraq/1999/08/990812-unicef.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001025101709/https://fas.org/news/iraq/1999/08/990812-unicef.htm |archive-date=2000-10-25 |access-date=2022-03-05 |publisher=]}}</ref> which when extrapolated yields an estimate between 400,000 to 500,000 excess deaths among children under 5.<ref name="ICMMS Analysis 2003">{{Cite journal |last1=Blacker |first1=John |last2=Jones |first2=Gareth |last3=Ali |first3=Mohamed M. |date=2003 |title=Annual mortality rates and excess deaths of children under five in Iraq, 1991-98 |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12888415/ |journal=Population Studies |volume=57 |issue=2 |pages=217–226 |doi=10.1080/0032472032000097119 |issn=0032-4728 |pmid=12888415}}</ref><ref name="ICMMS Analysis 2007">{{Cite journal |last1=Blacker |first1=John |last2=Ali |first2=Mohamed M. |last3=Jones |first3=Gareth |date=2007 |title=A response to criticism of our estimates of under-5 mortality in Iraq, 1980-98 |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17365870/ |journal=Population Studies |volume=61 |issue=1 |pages=7–13 |doi=10.1080/00324720601122031 |issn=0032-4728 |pmid=17365870}}</ref> The ICMMS reported that the autonomous Kurdistan Region experienced a lower child mortality rate (69 deaths per 1000 births) than the rest of Iraq. Several reasons have been cited for this: Kurdistan Region was subject to lesser sanctions; has borders with neighbouring countries that are more open than the rest of the country, making trade easier; and ] aid was delivered to Kurdistan faster and at a higher per capita rate compared to the rest of Iraq.<ref name="ICMMS Analysis 2000"/>
===Infant and child death rates===
]
A May 25, 2000 ] article<ref name=BBC2000>. ''].'' May 25, 2000.</ref> reported that before Iraq sanctions were imposed by the UN in 1990, infant mortality had "fallen to 47 per 1,000 live births between 1984 and 1989. This compares to approximately 7 per 1,000 in the UK." The BBC article was reporting from a study of the ], titled "Sanctions and childhood mortality in Iraq", that was published in the May 2000 '']'' medical journal.<ref name=lancet/> The study concluded that in southern and central Iraq, infant mortality rate between 1994 and 1999 had risen to 108 per 1,000. Child mortality rate, which refers to children between the age of one and five years, also drastically inclined from 56 to 131 per 1,000.<ref name=BBC2000 /> In the autonomous northern region during the same period, infant mortality declined from 64 to 59 per 1000 and under-5 mortality fell from 80 to 72 per 1000, which was attributed to better food and resource allocation.


In 2005, an Independent Inquiry Committee (IIC) set up by UN Secretary-General ] argued that, "for all flaws," data found in Iraq's 1997 census "make the very sharp surge in mortality reported by somewhat implausible," even commenting that the ICMMS data "may have been 'tampered with.'"<ref name="ICMMS Analysis 2007" /> However in 2007, researchers John Blacker, Mohamed M. Ali, and Gareth Jones pointed out that the 1997 census relied on "on data obtained in a format that had elsewhere been rejected as unreliable 30 years earlier," and that the results between the independent IST survey conducted in 1991 (128.5 per 1000 births) and the ICMMS (131 deaths per 1000 births) closely matched each other, indicating the latter's reliability.<ref name="ICMMS Analysis 2007" /> Although Iraqi government field workers conducted the interviews, they were supervised by UNICEF personnel; "any instructions to falsify the data would have had to be slipped in behind backs." The researchers also commented that for such tampering to occur, it "would have had to involve the insertion of fictitious births and deaths into the records," which "would have been almost impossible to effect without introducing serious distortions into the pattern of birth intervals" but there is no evidence that this occurred.<ref name="ICMMS Analysis 2007" /> They thus "maintain that the ICMMS is the most reliable, indeed the ''only'' reasonably reliable source of information on mortality in Iraq in the 1990s."<ref name="ICMMS Analysis 2007" />
The Lancet publication<ref name=lancet>{{cite web|author=Mohamed M Ali MSc, Iqbal H Shah PhD |url=http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673600022893/abstract |title=Sanctions and childhood mortality in Iraq |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736 |publisher=] |date=May 2000 |vol=355 |pages=1851–1858 |accessdate=2009-06-29}} Lists bibliographic details for article.</ref> was the result of two separate surveys by UNICEF<ref name=unicef99/> between February and May 1999 in partnership with the local authorities and with technical support by the WHO. "The large sample sizes - nearly 24,000 households randomly selected from all governorates in the south and center of Iraq and 16,000 from the north - helped to ensure that the margin of error for child mortality in both surveys was low," UNICEF Executive Director Carol Bellamy said.<ref name=unicef99/>


The ], citing UNICEF data published in 2007, reported that "Iraq’s child mortality rate ha increased by a staggering 150 percent since 1990, more than any other country," due to "years of repression, conflict and external sanctions"; according to the data, Iraq's under-5 child mortality rate increased from 50 deaths per 1000 births in 1990 to 125 deaths per 1000 births in 2005.<ref>{{Cite book |last=] |url=https://reliefweb.int/report/iraq/iraq-suffer-children |title=State of the World's Mothers 2007: Saving the Lives of Children Under 5 |date=2007 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-888393-19-4 |pages=25, 27}}</ref>
In the spring of 2000 a U.S. Congressional letter demanding the lifting of the sanctions garnered 71 signatures, while House Democratic Whip David Bonior called the economic sanctions against Iraq "infanticide masquerading as policy."<ref>, weekly update at GPF Feb. 14 - 18 2000</ref>


In 2017, researchers Tim Dyson and Valeria Cetorelli described "the rigging of the 1999 Unicef survey" as "an especially masterful fraud,"<ref name="Dyson & Cetorelli 2017" /> citing that three comprehensive surveys (using full birth histories) conducted with the ] Iraqi government—namely, the 2004 Iraq Living Conditions Survey (ILCS), which was initially discounted by the Volcker Committee for finding far fewer child deaths than expected, and the ] (MICS) carried out by UNICEF and Iraq's ] (MOH) in 2006 and again in 2011—all found that the child mortality rate in the period 1995–2000 was approximately 40 per 1000, which means that "there was no major rise in child mortality in Iraq after 1990 and during the period of the sanctions," although a "slight increase" in child mortality did occur "between 1990 and 1991."<ref name="Dyson & Cetorelli 2017" /> As a corollary, "there was no major improvement in child mortality" as a result of the ], contrary to claims made by some of its proponents.<ref name="Dyson & Cetorelli 2017" /> Per Dyson and Cetorelli, "the UN unobtrusively changed its own U5MR estimates in 2009."<ref name="Dyson & Cetorelli 2017" />
==Oil for Food==
{{Main|Oil-for-Food Programme}}
As the sanctions faced mounting criticism of its humanitarian impacts, several UN resolutions were introduced that allowed Iraq to trade its oil for goods such as food and medicines. The earliest of these resolutions were introduced in 1991.


==Controversies==
UN Resolution 706 of 15 August 1991 was introduced to allow the sale of Iraqi oil in exchange for food.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://daccess-ods.un.org/access.nsf/Get?Open&DS=S/RES/706%20(1991)&Lang=E&Area=RESOLUTION |title=PDF of resolution 706 |publisher=Daccess-ods.un.org |date= |accessdate=2009-06-15}}</ref>
UN Resolution 712 of 19 September 1991 confirmed that Iraq could sell up to $1.6 billion US in oil to fund an Oil For Food program.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://daccess-ods.un.org/access.nsf/Get?Open&DS=S/RES/712%20(1991)&Lang=E&Area=RESOLUTION |title=PDF of Resolution 712 |publisher=Daccess-ods.un.org |date= |accessdate=2009-06-15}}</ref>


Iraq was in 1996 allowed under the UN ] (under ]) to export $5.2 billion (USD) of oil every 6 months with which to purchase items needed to sustain the civilian population. After an initial refusal, Iraq signed a ] (MOU) in May 1996 for arrangements for the implementation of that resolution to be taken. The Oil-for-Food Programme started in October 1997, and the first shipments of food arrived in March 1998. Twenty-five percent of the proceeds were redirected to a Persian Gulf War reparations account,and three percent into United Nations programs related to Iraq. While the programme is creditted with improving the conditions of the population, ] who oversaw the it believed it inadequate to compensate for the adverse humanitarian impacts of the sanctions.

The U.S. State Department criticized the Iraqi government for inadequately spending this money: <blockquote>
In a stinging letter issued recently, the United Nations has pointed out the extent of Saddam Hussein's callous disregard for the welfare of his own people. ...
In the ... six-month phase of the program (June to December, 2000), Saddam Hussein's dereliction in providing for the Iraqi people and the nation's economy is laid bare.
During this period, US$7.8 billion were available to Iraq for purchases during this period, yet Iraq submitted purchase applications worth only US$4.26 billion - barely 54 percent of the amount available for purchases to help the humanitarian needs of the Iraqi people.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://usinfo.org/wf-archive/2001/010126/epf505.htm |title=Department of State Washington File: Fact Sheet: U.S. Department of State on Iraqi Underspending |publisher=Usinfo.org |date= |accessdate=2009-06-22}}</ref></blockquote>
In 2004/5 the Programme became the subject of major media attention over ], as allegations surfaced such as that Iraq had systematically sold allocations of oil at below-market prices in return for some of the proceeds from the resale outside the scope of the programme; Multiple investigations implicated individuals and companies from dozens of countries were implicated. See .

==Lifting of sanctions==
Following the 2003 ], the sanctions regime were largely ended on May 22, 2003 (with certain exceptions related to arms and to oil revenue) by paragraph 10 of ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/document/2003/0522resolution.htm |title=Resolution 1483 - UN Security Council - Global Policy Forum |publisher=Globalpolicy.org |date= |accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref>

Sanctions which gave the USA and UK control over Iraq's oil revenue were not removed until December 2010.<ref name="bbc.co.uk"/> Sanctions which require 5% of Iraq's oil and natural gas revenue to be paid to Kuwait as reparations for Saddam Hussain's invasion are still in effect.<ref name="bbc.co.uk"/><ref>{{cite web| title=United Nations Security Council Resolution 1956 (December 2010) | url =http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N10/694/83/PDF/N1069483.pdf?OpenElement }}</ref>


==Controversies==
===Culpability=== ===Culpability===
Scholar Ramon Das, published in Human Rights Research Journal of the New Zealand Center for Public Law, examined each of the "most widely accepted ethical frameworks" in the context of violations of Iraqi human rights under the sanctions, finding that "primary responsibility rests with the UNSC " under these frameworks, including rights-utilitarianism, moral Kantianism, and consequentialism.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Das |first=Ramon |title=Human Rights and Economic Sanctions in Iraq |publisher=Human Rights Research Journal |volume=1 |url=http://www.victoria.ac.nz/nzcpl/HRRJ/vol1/Das.pdf |pages=8–14 |year=2003 }}</ref> Scholar Ramon Das, in the Human Rights Research Journal of the New Zealand Center for Public Law, examined each of the "most widely accepted ethical frameworks" in the context of violations of Iraqi human rights under the sanctions, finding that "primary responsibility rests with the UNSC" under these frameworks, including rights-utilitarianism, moral Kantianism, and consequentialism.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Das |first=Ramon |title=Human Rights and Economic Sanctions in Iraq |publisher=Human Rights Research Journal |volume=1 |url=http://www.victoria.ac.nz/nzcpl/HRRJ/vol1/Das.pdf |pages=8–14 |year=2003 }}</ref><ref>See also the analysis of ], . Penang (Malaysia): Just World Trust (JUST), 1995. {{ISBN|983-9861-03-4}}.</ref> By contrast, some academics, American and UN officials, and Iraqi citizens contend that this ignores the consequences of allowing Saddam to continue his policies with no deterrence and unlimited capacity.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/27/magazine/were-sanctions-right.html|title=Were Sanctions Right? (Published 2003)|first=David|last=Rieff|newspaper=The New York Times|date=July 27, 2003}}</ref>


===Controversy about regional differences===
===Regional-difference-grounded culpability debate===
Some commentators blame Saddam Hussein for the excess deaths reported during this period. For example, Rubin argued that the Kurdish and the Iraqi governments handled OFFP aid differently, and that therefore the Iraqi government policy, rather than the sanctions themselves, should be held responsible for any negative effects.<ref name="Rubin">{{cite journal|last=Rubin |first=Michael |title=Sanctions on Iraq: A Valid Anti-American Grievance? |publisher=] |volume=5 |issue=4 |url=http://www.iraqwatch.org/perspectives/meria-rubin-sanctions-1201.htm |pages=100–115 |date=December 2001 |author-link=Michael Rubin (historian)|url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121028003924/http://www.iraqwatch.org/perspectives/meria-rubin-sanctions-1201.htm |archive-date=2012-10-28 }}</ref><ref name="tnr01">{{cite magazine|url=http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/print.php?template=C06&CID=565 |title=Sulaymaniyah Dispatch: Food Fight |first=Michael |last=Rubin |author-link=Michael Rubin (historian) |magazine=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010622042633/http://www.thenewrepublic.com/061801/rubin061801.html |archive-date=2001-06-22 |date=2001-06-07}}</ref> Likewise, Cortright claimed: "The tens of thousands of excess deaths in the south-center, compared to the similarly sanctioned but UN-administered north, are the result of Baghdad's failure to accept and properly manage the UN humanitarian relief effort."<ref name="Cortright" /> In the run-up to the Iraq War, some<ref name="ML2001">{{cite journal |first=Milton |last=Leitenberg |url=http://www.instituteforthestudyofgenocide.org/oldsite/newsletters/28/Saddam.html |year=2001 |title=Saddam is the Cause of Iraqis' Suffering |publisher=Institute For the Study of Genocide Newsletter |volume=28 |access-date=2010-12-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726181538/http://www.instituteforthestudyofgenocide.org/oldsite/newsletters/28/Saddam.html |archive-date=2011-07-26 |url-status=dead }}</ref> disputed the idea that excess mortality exceeded 500,000, because the Iraqi government had interfered with objective collection of statistics (independent experts were barred).<ref name="BC2000">{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/12/world/iraq-won-t-let-outside-experts-assess-sanctions-impact-on-lives.html |title=Iraq Won't Let Outside Experts Assess Sanctions' Impact on Lives |work=] |date=2000-09-12 |first=Barbara |last=Crossette |author-link=Barbara Crossette|access-date=2010-12-07}}</ref>
The Lancet<ref name=lancet/> and Unicef studies observed that child mortality decreased in the north and increased in the south/center between 1994 and 1999 but did not attempt to explain the disparity, or to apportion culpability; instead it recommended that "oth the Government of Iraq and the U.N. Sanctions Committee should give priority to contracts for supplies that will have a direct impact on the well-being of children," UNICEF said.<ref name=unicef99/>


Other Western observers, such as ] and Anthony Arnove, argue that the differences in results noted by authors such as Rubin may have been because the sanctions were not the same in the two parts of Iraq, due to several regional differences: in the per capita money,<ref name=Welch2002>{{cite web|url=http://reason.com/archives/2002/03/01/the-politics-of-dead-children |title=Reason Magazine - The Politics of Dead Children |publisher=Reason.com |access-date=2010-10-06 |first=Matt |last=Welch |date=March 2002 |author-link=Matt Welch}}</ref> in war damage to infrastructure and in the relative ease with which smugglers evaded sanctions through the porous Northern borders.<ref name=Arnove>{{Cite book|last=Arnove |first=Anthony. |title=Iraq Under Siege: The Deadly Impact of Sanctions and War |page=91 |publisher=] |date=April 2000}}</ref> Spagat argued in response that "it is hard to believe that these factors could completely overwhelm the major disadvantages of the Kurdish Zone in which perhaps 20% of the population was internally displaced compared to about 0.3% in the South/Centre" and that the ] (IFHS) suggests a higher (albeit declining) child mortality rate in the Kurdistan Region than elsewhere in Iraq during the mid-1990s.<ref name=Spagat>{{cite journal|url=http://personal.rhul.ac.uk/uhte/014/Truth%20and%20Death.pdf|title=Truth and death in Iraq under sanctions|first=Michael|last=Spagat|date=September 2010|journal=]|volume=7|issue=3|publisher=]/]|pages=116–120|doi=10.1111/j.1740-9713.2010.00437.x|s2cid=154415183 }}</ref>
Some sanctions apologists blame Saddam Hussein for the deaths resulting from sanctions. For example, ] argued that the Kurdish and the Iraqi governments handled Oil For Food aid differently, and that therefore the Iraqi government policy, rather than the Sanctions themsevles, should be held responsible for any negative effects.<ref name=tnr01>{{cite web|url=http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/print.php?template=C06&CID=565 |title=Sulaymaniyah Dispatch: Food Fight |first=Michael |last=Rubin |authorlink=Michael Rubin |publisher=] |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20010622042633/http://www.thenewrepublic.com/061801/rubin061801.html |archivedate=2001-06-22 |date=2001-06-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Rubin |first=Michael |title=Sanctions on Iraq: A Valid Anti-American Grievance? |publisher=] |volume=5 |issue=4 |url=http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2001/issue4/mrubin.pdf |pages=100–115 |date=December 2001 |authorlink=Michael Rubin }}</ref>' likewise, ] said that Iraq must "share responsibility."<ref name=Cortright/> In the run-up to the Iraq War, some even disputed the idea that excess mortality exceeded 500,000, because the Iraq Government had interfered with objective collection of statistics<ref name=Spagat>{{cite web|url=http://personal.rhul.ac.uk/uhte/014/Truth%20and%20Death.pdf |title=Truth and death in Iraq under sanctions |first=Michael |last=Spagat |date=2010 September |publisher=] }}</ref><ref name=BC2000>{{cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/12/world/iraq-won-t-let-outside-experts-assess-sanctions-impact-on-lives.html |title=Iraq Won't Let Outside Experts Assess Sanctions' Impact on Lives - New York Times |publisher=Nytimes.com |date=2000-09-12 |first=Barbara |last=Crossette |accessdate=2010-12-07}}</ref><ref name=ML2001>{{cite journal|first=Milton |last=Leitenberg |url=http://www.instituteforthestudyofgenocide.org/oldsite/newsletters/28/Saddam.html |year=2001 |title=Saddam is the Cause of Iraqis’ Suffering |publisher=Institute For the Study of Genocide Newsletter |volume=28 }}</ref>.

Other Western observers, such as ] and ], argue that the differences in results noted by authors such as Rubin (above) may have been because the sanctions were not the same in the two parts of Iraq, due to several sorts of regional differences: in the per capita money,<ref name=Welch2002/> in agriculture, in war damage to infrastructure and in the relative ease of with which smugglers evaded sanctions through the porous Northern borders<ref name=Arnove>{{Cite book|last=Arnove |first=Anthony. |title=Iraq Under Siege: The Deadly Impact of Sanctions and War |page=91 |publisher=South End Press |date=April 2000}}</ref>.

Iraqi attitudes toward the sanctions are complex, seeing them as part of a series of effects from decades of war; while no systematic study of attitudes has been permitted while that nation is dominated by Western military forces, interview-based research indicates attitudes focus on the deadly results of sanctions rather than apportion blame.<ref name=teenagers>{{cite web|author=Nadje Al-Ali and Yasmin Hussein |url=http://www.acttogether.org/Iraqiteenagers.htm |title=Between Dreams and Sanctions: Teenage Lives in Iraq |publisher=Act Together: Women's Action for Iraq |retrieved 2011-07-07 }}</ref> <ref name=women>{{cite web|first=Nadje |last=Al-Ali |url=http://www.acttogether.org/Womengender&sanctionsinIraq.htm |year=2001 |title=
Women, Gender Relations and Sanctions in Iraq |publisher=Act Together: Women's Action for Iraq |retrieved 2011-07-07 }}</ref>


===Arguments about the sanctions and the Iraq War=== ===Arguments about the sanctions and the Iraq War===
There is a controversy about the relationship between sanctions and the 2003 ]. ]
Some persons, such as ], accepted a large estimate of casualties due to sanctions,<ref>{{cite news|first=Iain |last=Murray |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20050319105007/www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030321-100212-7593r |title=Recent Research Suggests ... |publisher=United Press International |date=2003-03-21 |accessdate=2009-07-06 |url=http://mattwelch.com/Press/UPImead.htm |archivedate=2005-03-19}}</ref> but argued that invading Iraq was better than continuing the sanctions regime, since "Each year of containment is a new ]."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cfr.org/publication/5684/deadlier_than_war.html |title=Deadlier Than War - Council on Foreign Relations |publisher=Washington Post |date=March 12, 2003 |accessdate=2009-06-29}}</ref><ref name="2002lat">{{cite news Some analysts, such as ], accepted a large estimate of casualties due to sanctions,<ref>{{cite news|first=Iain |last=Murray |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050319105007/http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030321-100212-7593r |title=Recent Research Suggests ... |publisher=United Press International |date=2003-03-21 |access-date=2009-07-06 |url=http://mattwelch.com/Press/UPImead.htm |archive-date=2005-03-19 |url-status=dead }}</ref> but argued that invading Iraq was better than continuing the sanctions regime, since "Each year of containment is a new Gulf War."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cfr.org/publication/5684/deadlier_than_war.html |title=Deadlier Than War - Council on Foreign Relations |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=March 12, 2003 |access-date=2009-06-29}}</ref><ref name="2002lat">{{cite news
|first=Norah |last=Vincent |authorlink=Norah Vincent |first=Norah
|last=Vincent
|author-link=Norah Vincent
|title=Leftists Turn Blind Eye to Iraqis' Plight |title=Leftists Turn Blind Eye to Iraqis' Plight
|url= http://articles.latimes.com/2002/nov/07/opinion/oe-vincent7 |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-nov-07-oe-vincent7-story.html
|publisher=] |newspaper=]
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20021117111002/http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-vincent7nov07%2C0%2C1488205.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions
|page=
|archive-date=2002-11-17
|archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20021117111002/http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-vincent7nov07,0,1488205.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions
|archivedate= 2002-11-17 |date=2002-11-07
|url-status=live
|date=2002-11-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ocweekly.com/content/printVersion/38855 | archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20030603223222/www.ocweekly.com/ink/03/09/news-schou2.php |title=An Immodest Proposal |publisher=] |date=2002-11-07 |accessdate=2010-04-19 |archivedate=2003-06-03 |first=Mark |last=LeVine |authorlink = Mark LeVine }}</ref>
}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.ocweekly.com/content/printVersion/38855 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030603223222/http://www.ocweekly.com/ink/03/09/news-schou2.php |title=An Immodest Proposal |newspaper=] |date=2002-11-07 |access-date=2010-04-19 |archive-date=2003-06-03 |first=Mark |last=LeVine |author-link=Mark LeVine |url-status=dead }}</ref>
Former ] ], in his testimony to the ], also argued that ending sanctions was one benefit of the war.<ref name=Spagat/>


===Albright interview===
] ], who called the sanctions "the most intrusive system of arms control in history",<ref>{{cite news|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9505E3D9113CF934A1575BC0A9649C8B63 |title=EYES ON IRAQ; In Cheney's Words: The Administration Case for Removing Saddam Hussein - New York Times |publisher=New York Times |date=2002-08-27 |accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref> cited the breakdown of the sanctions as one cause or ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2004/10/20041026-7.html |title=Vice President and Mrs. Cheney's Remarks in Wilmington, Ohio |publisher=Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov |date= |accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref> While UN resolutions subsequent to the cessation of hostilities during the ] imposed several requisite responsibilities on Iraq for the removal of sanctions, the largest focus remained on the regime's development of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, and in particular its laggard participation in the ]-led disarmament process required of it. The goal of several western governments had been that the disruptive effects of war and sanction would lead to a critical situation in which Iraqis would in some way effect "regime change", a removal of Saddam Hussein and his closest allies from power.{{Citation needed|date=June 2009}}
On May 12, 1996, ] (then ]) appeared on a '']'' segment in which ] (referring to the 1995 FAO study<ref name=Spagat/>) asked her "We have heard that half a million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?" and Albright replied "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price, we think the price is worth it." Albright wrote later that Saddam Hussein, not the sanctions, was to blame. She criticized Stahl's segment as "amount to Iraqi propaganda"; said that her question was a ];<ref name=Rosen2002>{{cite news|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4191/is_20020315/ai_n9999150 |title=U.S., U.N. not to blame for deaths of Iraqis |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020414184813/http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/news_columnists/article/0%2C1299%2CDRMN_86_1028937%2C00.html |archive-date=2002-04-14 |newspaper=] |first=Mike |last=Rosen |author-link=Mike Rosen |date=2002-03-15 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://orangecoyote.blogspot.com/2006/07/albrights-blunder.html |title=Albright's Blunder |access-date=2008-01-04 |year=2002 |publisher=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030603215848/http://www.irvinereview.org/guest1.htm |archive-date=2003-06-03}}</ref> wrote "I had fallen into a trap and said something I did not mean";<ref name="albright">{{Cite book|title =Madam Secretary: A Memoir | first =Madeleine | last =Albright | author-link=Madeleine Albright | year= 2003 | pages=274, 275 | publisher =Miramax Books | isbn =9780786868438 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6qV4AAAAMAAJ&q=%22Iraqi+propaganda%22 }}</ref> and regretted coming "across as cold-blooded and cruel".<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9RnakB6HbUwC&q=%22the+price,+we+think,+the+price+is+worth+it%22&pg=RA1-PA55 |title=The mighty and the Almighty ... - Google Books |access-date=2010-09-09|isbn=9780060892579 |last1=Albright |first1=Madeleine |author-link=Madeleine Albright|date=2006-05-02 |publisher=Harper Collins }}</ref> The segment won an ].<ref name=Spagat/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1998/07/09/60minutes/bios/main13546.shtml |title=Lesley Stahl |access-date=2011-06-05 |year=1998 |work=] }}</ref> Albright's "non-denial" was taken by sanctions opponents as confirmation of a high number of sanctions related casualties.<ref name=Welch2002/><ref name=Rosen2002/>


===Albright Interview=== ===Iraq Inquiry===
The ] led by Sir ] examined a February 2003 statement by then-] ] that "today, 135 out of every 1,000 Iraqi children die before the age of five". The inquiry found that the figure in question was provided to Blair by ] ] and the ] (FCO) based on the 1999 ICMMS study, but an internal caveat from the FCO and the ] (DFID) to the effect that the ICMMS was of questionable reliability because it had been "conducted with the Iraqi regime's 'help' and relied on some Iraqi figures" was not communicated to Blair by a ] official. The inquiry noted "The level of child mortality in Iraq estimated by the ICMMS was significantly higher than that estimated by later surveys," citing "estimates that the under‑five mortality rate in Iraq was 55 per 1,000 in 1989, 46 per 1,000 in 1999, 42 per 1,000 in 2003, and 37 per 1,000 in 2010 (when Mr Blair gave his evidence to the Inquiry)."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20170203172304/http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/search/?page=26|title=The Report of the Iraq Inquiry: Report of a Committee of Privy Counsellors: SECTION 17: CIVILIAN CASUALTIES|publisher=]/]|date=2016-07-06|accessdate=2022-03-05|pages=174–175}}</ref>
On May 12, 1996, ] (then ]) appeared on a '']'' segment in which ] asked her "We have heard that half a million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?" and Albright replied "we think the price is worth it."
Albright wrote later that Saddam Hussein, not the sanctions, was to blame. She criticized Stahl's segment as "amount to Iraqi propaganda"; said that her question was a ];<ref name=Rosen2002>{{cite news |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4191/is_20020315/ai_n9999150 |title=U.S., U.N. not to blame for deaths of Iraqis |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20020414184813/http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/news_columnists/article/0,1299,DRMN_86_1028937,00.html |archivedate=2002-04-14 |publisher=] |first=Mike |last=Rosen |authorlink=Mike Rosen | date=2002-03-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://orangecoyote.blogspot.com/2006/07/albrights-blunder.html |title=Albright's Blunder |accessdate=2008-01-04 |year=2002 |publisher=] |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20030603215848/http://www.irvinereview.org/guest1.htm |archivedate=2003-06-03}}</ref> wrote "I had fallen into a trap and said something I did not mean";<ref name="albright">{{Cite book|title =Madam Secretary: A Memoir | first =Madeleine | last =Albright | authorlink=Madeleine Albright | year= 2003 | pages=274, 275 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=6qV4AAAAMAAJ&q=%22Iraqi+propaganda%22 }}</ref> and regretted coming "across as cold-blooded and cruel".<ref>{{cite book|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=9RnakB6HbUwC&pg=RA1-PA55&dq=%22the+price,+we+think,+the+price+is+worth+it%22 |title=The mighty and the Almighty ... - Google Books |publisher=Books.google.com |date= |accessdate=2010-09-09}}</ref> The segment won an Emmy Award.<ref name=Spagat/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1998/07/09/60minutes/bios/main13546.shtml |title=Lesley Stahl |accessdate=2011-06-05 |year=1998 |publisher=] }}</ref> Albright's "non-denial" was taken by sanctions opponents as confirmation of a high number of sanctions related casualties.<ref name=Welch2002/><ref name=Rosen2002/>


===Reactions to sanctions=== ==Lifting of sanctions==
Following the ], the sanctions regime was largely ended on May 22, 2003 (with certain exceptions related to arms and to oil revenue) by paragraph 10 of ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/document/2003/0522resolution.htm |title=Resolution 1483 - UN Security Council - Global Policy Forum |publisher=Globalpolicy.org |access-date=2009-05-30}}</ref> In December 2010, the UNSC "voted to return control of Iraq's oil and natural gas revenue to the government on 30 June and to end all remaining activities of the ".<ref name="bbc.co.uk"/>
There is evidence that the Iraqi government did not fully cooperate with the sanctions. For example, Hussein's son-in-law is heard speaking of concealing information from UN inspectors on audiotapes released in 2006. "I go back to the question of whether we should reveal everything or continue to be silent. Sir, since the meeting has taken this direction, I would say it is in our interest not to reveal." <ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/02/18/hussein.tapes/index.html |title=On tape, Hussein talks of WMDs - Feb 19, 2006 |publisher=CNN.com |date= |accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref><ref></ref> Hussein may have considered the many governments' displeasure with him, but particularly that of two veto-wielding ] members, the ] and ] (both of which took the hardest lines on Iraq), as a no-win situation and disincentive to cooperation in the process.<ref></ref>


Iraq's ] obligations "concerning the return of Kuwaiti and third-State nationals" were rescinded in June 2013 by ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://press.un.org/en/2013/sc11050.doc.htm|title=Unanimously Adopting Resolution 2107 (2013), Security Council Removes Iraq from Chapter VII Obligations over Return of Kuwaiti Nationals|publisher=]|date=2013-06-27|accessdate=2022-11-24}}</ref> In December 2021, ] announced that it had paid off its entire debt of $52 billion in war reparations to Kuwait.<ref name="Middle East Monitor">{{Cite web |date=2021-12-23 |title=Iraq pays final instalment of $52bn war reparations to Kuwait |url=https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20211223-iraq-pays-final-instalment-of-52bn-war-reparations-to-kuwait/ |access-date=2021-12-31 |website=Middle East Monitor |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref name="rudaw">{{Cite web |title=Iraq completes fifty-two billion dollar reparations to Kuwait |url=https://www.rudaw.net/english/middleeast/iraq/221220211 |access-date=2021-12-23 |website=www.rudaw.net}}</ref>
It has been alleged that UNSCOM had been infiltrated by British and American spies for purposes other than determining if Iraq possessed WMDs.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/301168.stm |title=Middle East &#124; Unscom 'infiltrated by spies' |publisher=BBC News |date=1999-03-23 |accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/theissues/article/0,6512,794275,00.html |title=UN weapons inspections &#124; World news &#124; guardian.co.uk |publisher=Guardian |date= 2002-12-09|accessdate=2009-05-30 | location=London | first=Simon | last=Jeffery}}</ref> Former inspector ] was a prominent source of these charges. Former UNSCOM chief inspector ] said "the longer it continued, the more the intelligence agencies would, often for very legitimate reasons, decide that they had to use the access they got through cooperation with UNSCOM to carry out their missions.".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/unscom/interviews/kay.html |title=frontline: spying on saddam: interviews: david kay |publisher=Pbs.org |date= |accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fair.org/activism/unscom-history.html |title=FAIR ACTION ALERT: Spying in Iraq: From Fact to Allegation |publisher=Fair.org |date= |accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref>


==Legacy==
Saddam, who saw all this as a violation of Iraq's sovereignty, became less cooperative and more obstructive of UNSCOM activities as the years wore on, and refused access for several years beginning in August 1998. Ultimately Saddam condemned the US for enforcing the sanctions through the UN and demanded nothing less than unconditional lifting of all sanctions on its country, including the weapons sanctions. The US and UN refused to do so out of concern that Saddam's regime would rebuild its once-powerful military and renew its WMD programs with the trade revenues.
In a ], ] leader ] cited the sanctions against Iraq as a justification for attacks against Americans. Bin Laden stated that the sanctions had caused the deaths of 1.5 million Iraqi children in an effort "to destroy Iraq, the most powerful neighboring Arab state."<ref>{{cite journal|authorlink=Daniel Byman|last=Byman|first=Daniel L.|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/25054248|title=Review: Al-Qaeda as an Adversary: Do We Understand Our Enemy?|journal=]|publisher=]|volume=56|issue=1|date=October 2003|pages=144–145|doi=10.1353/wp.2004.0002 |jstor=25054248 |s2cid=154862540 }}</ref>


In a 2015 article in the journal '']'', Francesco Giumelli noted that the UNSC had largely abandoned comprehensive sanctions in favor of targeted sanctions since the mid-1990s, with the controversy over the efficacy and civilian harms attributed to the Iraq sanctions playing a significant role in the change: "The sanctions imposed on Iraq in 1990 covered all goods entering or leaving the entire country, whereas those imposed today are most often directed against individuals or non-state entities, and are more limited in scope.&nbsp;... The widespread view&nbsp;... that 500,000 Iraqi children died as a result of UN comprehensive sanctions itself rang the death knell for the perceived utility of comprehensive measures."<ref name="Giumelli 2015"/> In a similar vein, Albright herself told an interviewer in 2020 that "we learned in many ways that comprehensive sanctions often hurt the people of the country and don't really accomplish what is wanted in order to change the behavior of the country being sanctioned. So we began to look at something called 'smart sanctions' or 'targeted sanctions.'"<ref>{{cite web|last=Marchese|first=David|url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/20/magazine/madeline-albright-interview.html|title=Madeleine Albright Thinks It's Good When America Gets Involved|work=]|date=2020-04-25|accessdate=2022-03-24}}</ref>
] reports that in 2001 "before the ], ] ] advocated diluting the multinational economic sanctions, in the hope that a weaker set of sanctions could win stronger and more sustained international support."<ref>{{cite news|last=Feith |first=Douglas J. |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121504452359324921.html |title=Why We Went to War in Iraq - WSJ.com |publisher=Online.wsj.com |date=2008-07-03 |accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref> Renewed pressure in 2002 led to the entry of ], which received some degree of cooperation but failed to declare Iraq's disarmament immediately prior to the ], for which it was withdrawn and became inactive in Iraq.


==See also==
In the ], Osama Bin Laden cited retribution for the sanctions as one of the
*]
] for the ].<ref name="aljazeera04">{{cite web|url= http://english.aljazeera.net/archive/2004/11/200849163336457223.html|quote="the greatest mass slaughter of children mankind has ever known"|title=Full transcript of bin Ladin's speech |publisher=aljazeera|accessdate=29 November 2009}}</ref>
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]


==Footnotes== ==References==
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}} {{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}

==External links and References==
* {{Cite book|title=The scourging of Iraq: sanctions, law, and natural justice|author=Geoffrey Leslie Simons|publisher=St. Martin's Press|year=1996|isbn=9780312215194}}
*{{cite web|url=http://www.casi.org.uk/info/unicef/990816qa.html |title=UNICEF : Questions and Answers for the Iraq child mortality surveys |publisher=Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq (CASI) Website - ''Unofficial publication'' |date=16 Aug 1999 }}
*], Released September 13, 1999 (updated 2/23/00),
*David Edwards, ''Zmag'', 3 March 2000,
*{{cite web|url=http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/print.php?template=C06&CID=565 |title=Sulaymaniyah Dispatch: Food Fight |first=Michael |last=Rubin |authorlink=Michael Rubin |publisher=] |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20010622042633/http://www.thenewrepublic.com/061801/rubin061801.html |archivedate=2001-06-22 |date=2001-06-07}}
*], "". '']'', November 2001.
*{{cite web|url=http://www.reason.com/news/show/28346.html |title=The Politics of Dead Children: Have sanctions against Iraq murdered millions? |first=Matt |last=Welch |authorlink=Matt Welch |publisher=] |date=March 2002}}
*], May 23, 2003,
*], 25 May 2003,
*], '']'', 4 October 2004, , and
*IRIN News, news agency of the UN OCHA agency, looks again at the figures (August 2005):
*], Christopher Hayes, March 6, 2006,
*{{Cite book|last=Wright |first=Steven |title=The United States and Persian Gulf Security: The Foundations of the War on Terror |publisher=Ithaca Press |year=2007 |ISBN=978-0863723216}}
*{{Cite book|last=Gordon|first=Joy|title=Invisible War: The United States and the Iraq Sanctions|publisher=Harvard |year=2010|ISBN=978-0674035713}}
*{{cite web|url=http://personal.rhul.ac.uk/uhte/014/Truth%20and%20Death.pdf |title=Truth and death in Iraq under sanctions |first=Michael |last=Spagat |date=2010 September |publisher=] }}
* - video report by '']''

{{Iraq topics}} {{Iraq topics}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Iraq Sanctions}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Iraq Sanctions}}
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 12:08, 13 December 2024

Baghdad in 1991, during the Gulf War and sanctions
Events leading up
to the Iraq War

On 6 August 1990, four days after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) placed a comprehensive embargo on Iraq. The sanctions stayed largely in force until 22 May 2003 (after Saddam Hussein's being forced from power), and persisted in part, including reparations to Kuwait. The original stated purposes of the sanctions were to compel Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait, to pay reparations, and to disclose and eliminate any weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

The UNSC imposed stringent economic sanctions on Iraq by adopting and enforcing United Nations Security Council Resolution 661 in August 1990. Resolution 661 banned all trade and financial resources with both Iraq and occupied Kuwait except for medicine and "in humanitarian circumstances" foodstuffs, the import of which was tightly regulated. In April 1991, following Iraq's defeat in the Gulf War, Resolution 687 lifted the prohibition on foodstuffs, but sanctions remained in effect with revisions, including linkage to removal of weapons of mass destruction.

Despite the provisions of Resolution 706, Resolution 712, and Resolution 986, the UN and the Iraqi government could not agree on the terms of an Oil-for-Food Programme (OFFP), which effectively barred Iraqi oil from the world market for several years. When a memorandum of understanding was finally reached in 1996, the resulting OFFP allowed Iraq to resume oil exports in controlled quantities, but the funds were held in escrow and the majority of Iraq's purchases had to be individually approved by the "Iraq Sanctions Committee," composed of the fifteen members of the UNSC. (Additionally, some funds were withheld for Kuwaiti reparations.) The sanctions regime was continually modified in response to growing international concern over civilian harms attributed to the sanctions; eventually, all limitations on the quantity of Iraqi oil exports were removed (per Resolution 1284), and a large proportion of Iraqi purchases were pre-approved (per Resolution 1409), with the exception of those involving dual-use technology. In later years, Iraq manipulated the OFFP to generate hard currency for illegal transactions, while some neighboring countries began to ignore the sanctions entirely, contributing to a modest economic recovery. By reducing food imports, the sanctions appear to have played a role in encouraging Iraq to become more agriculturally self-sufficient, although malnutrition among Iraqis was nevertheless reported.

During the 1990s and 2000s, many surveys and studies found child mortality more than doubled during the sanctions, with estimates ranging from 227,000 to 500,000 excess deaths among children under the age of 5. On the other hand, several later surveys conducted in cooperation with the post-Saddam government during the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq have suggested that commonly cited data were doctored by the Saddam Hussein regime and that "there was no major rise in child mortality in Iraq after 1990 and during the period of the sanctions." Nevertheless, sanctions contributed to a significant reduction in Iraq's per capita national income, high rates of malnutrition, shortages of medical supplies, diseases from lack of clean water, lengthy power outages, and the near collapse of the education system—especially prior to the introduction of the OFFP. Most UNSC sanctions since the 1990s have been targeted rather than comprehensive, a change partially motivated by concerns that the Iraq sanctions had inflicted disproportionate civilian harm.

Prior calls to sanction Iraq

The Reagan administration generally supported Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War, despite Iraq's extensive use of chemical weapons against post-revolutionary Iran. In response to reports of further Iraqi chemical attacks against its Kurdish minority after the end of the war with Iran, in September 1988 United States (U.S.) senators Claiborne Pell and Jesse Helms called for comprehensive economic sanctions against Iraq, including an oil embargo and severe limitations on the export of dual-use technology. Although the ensuing legislation passed in the U.S. Senate, it faced strong opposition within the House of Representatives and did not become law. Several U.S. commercial interests with ties to Iraq lobbied against sanctions, as did the State Department, despite Secretary of State George Shultz's public condemnation of Iraq's "unjustified and abhorrent" chemical attacks. According to Pell in October 1988: "Agricultural interests objected to the suspension of taxpayer subsidies for agricultural exports to Iraq; the oil industry protested the oil boycott—although alternative supplies are readily available. Even a chemical company called to inquire how its products might be impacted."

Administration

As described by the United Nations (UN), the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 661 imposed comprehensive sanctions on Iraq following that country's August 1990 invasion of Kuwait. These sanctions included strict limits both on the items that could be imported into Iraq and on those that could be exported. UN Resolutions 660, 661, 662, 664, 665, 666, 667, 669, 670, 674, 677, 678 and 687 expressed the goals of eliminating weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and extended-range ballistic missiles, prohibiting any support for terrorism, and forcing Iraq to pay war reparations and all foreign debt.

Limitations on imports

When the Oil-for-Food Programme (OFFP) allowed Iraq to resume exporting oil in 1996, the resulting revenue was held in escrow; Iraq had to ask the "Iraq Sanctions Committee" (i.e., the fifteen members of the UNSC) to individually approve its purchases, with "foodstuffs and certain medical, health and agricultural materials exempt from review" according to the United States Department of State. (Additionally, some of the revenue was redirected for other purposes, notably reparations to Kuwait.) In May 2002 the process was streamlined by Resolution 1409, which established a "Goods Review List" for dual-purpose items. From then on, all other Iraqi purchases were automatically approved, while the listed items were reviewed separately.

Enforcement of sanctions

An American helicopter shadows the Russian oil tanker Volgoneft-147

Enforcement of the sanctions was primarily by means of military force and legal sanctions. Following the passage of Security Council Resolution 665, a Multinational Interception Force was organized and led by the U.S. to intercept, inspect and possibly impound vessels, cargoes and crews suspected of carrying freight to or from Iraq.

The legal side of sanctions included enforcement through actions brought by individual governments. In the U.S., legal enforcement was handled by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). For example, in 2005 OFAC fined Voices in the Wilderness $20,000 for gifting medicine and other humanitarian supplies to Iraqis without prior acquisition of an export license as required by law.

Effectiveness

There is a general consensus that the sanctions achieved the express goals of limiting Iraqi arms. For example, U.S. Under Secretary of Defense Douglas J. Feith says that the sanctions diminished Iraq militarily. According to scholars George A. Lopez and David Cortright: "Sanctions compelled Iraq to accept inspections and monitoring and won concessions from Baghdad on political issues such as the border dispute with Kuwait. They also drastically reduced the revenue available to Saddam, prevented the rebuilding of Iraqi defenses after the Persian Gulf War, and blocked the import of vital materials and technologies for producing WMD." Saddam told his Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) interrogator that Iraq's armaments "had been eliminated by the UN sanctions."

Oil-for-Food Programme

Main article: Oil-for-Food Programme

As the humanitarian impact of the sanctions became a matter of international concern, several UN resolutions were introduced that allowed Iraq to trade its oil for approved goods such as food and medicine. The earliest of these, Resolution 706 of 15 August 1991, allowed the sale of Iraqi oil in exchange for food, which was reaffirmed by Resolution 712 in September 1991. The UN states that "The Government of Iraq declined these offers". As a result, Iraq was effectively barred from exporting oil to the world market for several years.

Iraqi GDP per capita, 1990–2003, per UNDESA
1990 $1,371
1991 $467
1992 $537
1993 $372
1994 $289
1995 $241
1996 $410
1997 $435
1998 $538
1999 $910
2000 $1,006
2001 $1,022
2002 $978
2003 $903

In April 1995, an Oil-for-Food Programme (OFFP) was formally created under Security Council Resolution 986, but the resolution could not be implemented until Iraq signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the UN in May 1996. Under the OFFP, the UN states that "Iraq was permitted to sell $2 billion worth of oil every six months, with two-thirds of that amount to be used to meet Iraq's humanitarian needs. In 1998, the limit on the level of Iraqi oil exports ... was raised to $5.26 billion every six months, again with two-thirds of the oil proceeds to be earmarked to meet the humanitarian needs of the Iraqi people." In later iterations of the OFFP (pursuant to the December 1999 Resolution 1284), there were no restrictions on Iraq's oil exports and the share of revenue allocated to humanitarian relief increased to 72%; 25% of the proceeds (which were held in escrow) were redirected to a Kuwaiti reparations fund, and 3% to UN programs related to Iraq. The first shipments of food arrived in March 1997, with medicines following in May 1997. The UN recounts that "Over the life of the Programme, the Security Council expanded its initial emphasis on food and medicines to include infrastructure rehabilitation". The UN, rather than the Iraqi government, administered the OFFP in Iraq's Kurdistan Region.

While the OFFP is credited with improving the conditions of the population, it was not free from controversy. The U.S. State Department criticized the Iraqi government for inadequately spending the money. In 2004–2005, the OFFP became the subject of major media attention over corruption, as allegations surfaced that Iraq had systematically sold oil vouchers at below-market prices in return for some of the proceeds from the resale outside the scope of the programme; investigations implicated individuals and companies from dozens of countries. In 2005, a UN investigation led by Paul Volcker found that the director of the OFFP, Benon Sevan, personally accepted $147,184 in bribes from Saddam's government, which Sevan denied.

By the late 1990s, the Iraqi economy showed signs of modest growth, which would continue until 2003: Iraq's gross domestic product increased from US$10.8 billion in 1996 to US$30.8 billion in 2000. The OFFP was the major factor in this growth, as it led to the inflow of hard currency, which helped reduce inflation. (Another factor was illegal transactions, as many countries began to simply ignore the sanctions.) While internal and external trade was revitalized, this did not lead to a significant increase in the standard of living for the majority of the population; on the contrary, the government tried to prevent benefits from flowing to Shi'ite areas in southern Iraq to persuade more countries to oppose the sanctions. In 2000, the national income per capita was estimated to be US$1,000—less than half of what it had been in 1990, according to Robert Litwak.

Effects on the Iraqi people during sanctions

High rates of malnutrition, lack of medical supplies, and diseases from lack of clean water were reported during the sanctions. In 2001, the chairman of the Iraqi Medical Association's scientific committee sent a plea to The BMJ to help it raise awareness of the disastrous effects the sanctions were having on the Iraqi healthcare system.

In January 1991, the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) prepared a detailed study of Iraq’s water treatment system. Titled "Iraq Water Treatment Vulnerabilities," the DIA study noted that Iraq's water treatment system was particularly vulnerable to sanctions, noting that "it probably will take at least six months (to June 1991) before the system is fully degraded," as supply levels of crucial water treatment chemicals such as chlorine and aluminium sulphate were "known to be critically low" and their "mportation been embargoed." The study thus predicted an increase in disease and even "epidemics of such diseases as cholera, hepatitis, and typhoid" if the sanctions remained in place. The percentage of Iraqis with access to clean drinking water dropped from an estimated 90 per cent in 1990 to 41 per cent in 1999.

In 1993, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reported that the sanctions "have virtually paralyzed the whole economy and generated persistent deprivation, chronic hunger, endemic undernutrition, massive unemployment and widespread human suffering." Denis Halliday, the UN Humanitarian Coordinator in Baghdad, Iraq, resigned in October 1998 resigned after a 34-year career with the UN in order to have the freedom to criticise the sanctions regime, saying "I don't want to administer a programme that satisfies the definition of genocide." However, Sophie Boukhari, a UNESCO Courier journalist, reports that "some legal experts are skeptical about or even against using such terminology" and quotes Mario Bettati for the view that "People who talk like that don't know anything about law. The embargo has certainly affected the Iraqi people badly, but that's not at all a crime against humanity or genocide."

Halliday's successor, Hans von Sponeck, subsequently also resigned in protest, calling the effects of the sanctions a "true human tragedy". Jutta Burghardt, head of the World Food Program in Iraq, followed them.

Impact on agriculture

Throughout the Ba'ath Party's rule over Iraq, the agricultural sector had been under-performing. Those in the U.S. who supported sanctions believed that low agricultural production in Iraq (coupled with sanctions) would lead to "a hungry population", and "a hungry population was an unruly one". The Iraqi government, which understood the serious effects the sanctions could have on Iraq, was able to increase agricultural output by 24 percent from 1990 to 1991. During the sanction years, the agricultural sector witnessed "a boom of unprecedented proportions". Iraq's Revolutionary Command Council (RCC) introduced several decrees during this period to increase agricultural performance. These decrees may be separated into three categories:

  • They introduced severe penalties on farmers (or landowners) unable to produce at full capacity on their land.
  • Government programs made it cheaper (and therefore more profitable for farmers and landowners) to produce.
  • Programs were initiated to increase the amount of arable land.

The RCC introduced Decree No. 367 in 1990, which stated that all lands which were not under production by their owners would be taken over by the state; if the owner could not use all of the land he owned, he would lose it. However, the RCC's policy was not "all stick and no carrot". The government made it easier for farmers and landowners to receive credit. On 30 September 1990, the Ministry of Agriculture announced that it would increase loans to farmers by 100 percent, and would subsidize machinery and tools. In October 1990, the RCC stated it was planning to utilize and exploit "every inch of Iraqi arable land". While official statistics cannot be trusted entirely, they showed massive growth in arable land: from 16,446 donums in 1980 to 45,046 donums in 1990. In turn, irrigation projects were launched to meet the increased demand for water in Iraq's agricultural sector. The increase in agricultural output does not mean that hunger was not widespread; prices of foodstuffs increased dramatically during this period. However, overall the sanctions failed and (indirectly) led to an unprecedented improvement in agriculture, creating a constituency of farmers in central Iraq who had a vested interest in the sanctions remaining in effect. Data from 1990 is also consistent with the observation that destruction wrought by the 1991 Gulf War may be more responsible than the sanctions themselves for reducing Iraq's capacity to increase food production further.

Joseph Sassoon commented on Iraq's successful use of food rationing to mitigate the effects of sanctions and war, suggesting that Iraq's government was not wholly lacking in competence or efficiency despite being portrayed as such by critics.

Estimates of excess deaths due to sanctions

During the 1990s and 2000s, many surveys and studies concluded that excess deaths in Iraq—specifically among children under the age of 5—greatly increased during the sanctions at varying degrees. On the other hand, several later surveys conducted in cooperation with the post-Saddam government during the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq "all put the U5MR in Iraq during 1995–2000 in the vicinity of 40 per 1000," suggesting that "there was no major rise in child mortality in Iraq after 1990 and during the period of the sanctions."

In 1991, the International Study Team (IST) conducted an independent nationally representative household survey and found that mortality among children under the age of 5 increased from 43.2 deaths per 1000 births prior to Operation Desert Storm to 128.5 deaths per 1000 births during the first eight months of 1991; when extrapolated, this accounted for approximately 46,900 excess deaths from January to August 1991. In 1995, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) conducted a small survey representative of Baghdad's neighbourhoods and reported that the under-5 child mortality rate had increased to 206 per 1000 births by August 1995; extrapolating approximately 567,000 deaths of children under the age of 5. However, when Sarah Zaidi—one of the study's coauthors—carried out follow-up surveys and reinterviews in 1996 and 1997: "65 deaths recorded in 1995 were not reported in 1996, and nine recorded in 1996 were not reported in 1995"; of 26 women interviewed in 1995 and 1997, "Nine child deaths that had been recorded in 1995 but not in 1996 were confirmed ... 13 were not confirmed, and four miscarriages and stillbirths were found to have been mistakenly recorded as deaths in 1995." Moreover, the results of the 1996 survey (38 deaths per 1000 births) was less than one-fifth that of the 1995 survey (206 deaths per 1000 births), leading Zaidi to conclude that "an accurate estimate of child mortality in Iraq probably lies between the two surveys." Zaidi later told Michael Spagat: "My guess is that 'some' Iraqi surveyors recorded deaths when they did not take place or the child had died outside the time frame but they specified the opposite." Nevertheless, epidemiologist Richard Garfield writes that the Baghdad studies "cannot be used as a national estimate because, as in most developing countries, mortality is likely to be higher outside the capital city," and projects that "Assuming that a quarter of all under 5s live in Baghdad, the 1996 mortality estimate would project to a national rate in the range 47–100" deaths per 1000 births.

In 1999, Garfield—utilizing a statistical model and "Information from twenty-two field studies, including data from thirty-six nutritional assessments ... demographic estimates from nine sources, three Iraqi government reports, ten UN-related reports, and eighteen press and research reports," as well as "four large, well designed and managed studies examining death rates among children from 1988 through 1998"—estimates that from 1991 to 1996, deaths among children under 5 reached, at a minimum, 80 per 1000 births; by March 1998, a likely 227,000 excess deaths among children under 5 had occurred, "an average of about 60 excess deaths each day." In 2000, Garfield, citing new data, recalculated his estimate to 350,000 excess deaths.

Later on in 1999, the UN International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) published a study called the "Iraq Child and Maternal Mortality Survey" (ICMMS). Using survey data from nearly 40,000 households collated in cooperation with Iraqi government and autonomous Kurdistan Region field workers, the ICMMS found that Iraq's under-5 child mortality rate increased from 56 deaths per 1000 births (during 1984–1989) to 131 deaths per 1000 births (during 1994–1999), which when extrapolated yields an estimate between 400,000 to 500,000 excess deaths among children under 5. The ICMMS reported that the autonomous Kurdistan Region experienced a lower child mortality rate (69 deaths per 1000 births) than the rest of Iraq. Several reasons have been cited for this: Kurdistan Region was subject to lesser sanctions; has borders with neighbouring countries that are more open than the rest of the country, making trade easier; and Oil-for-Food Programme aid was delivered to Kurdistan faster and at a higher per capita rate compared to the rest of Iraq.

In 2005, an Independent Inquiry Committee (IIC) set up by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan argued that, "for all flaws," data found in Iraq's 1997 census "make the very sharp surge in mortality reported by somewhat implausible," even commenting that the ICMMS data "may have been 'tampered with.'" However in 2007, researchers John Blacker, Mohamed M. Ali, and Gareth Jones pointed out that the 1997 census relied on "on data obtained in a format that had elsewhere been rejected as unreliable 30 years earlier," and that the results between the independent IST survey conducted in 1991 (128.5 per 1000 births) and the ICMMS (131 deaths per 1000 births) closely matched each other, indicating the latter's reliability. Although Iraqi government field workers conducted the interviews, they were supervised by UNICEF personnel; "any instructions to falsify the data would have had to be slipped in behind backs." The researchers also commented that for such tampering to occur, it "would have had to involve the insertion of fictitious births and deaths into the records," which "would have been almost impossible to effect without introducing serious distortions into the pattern of birth intervals" but there is no evidence that this occurred. They thus "maintain that the ICMMS is the most reliable, indeed the only reasonably reliable source of information on mortality in Iraq in the 1990s."

The Save the Children Fund, citing UNICEF data published in 2007, reported that "Iraq’s child mortality rate ha increased by a staggering 150 percent since 1990, more than any other country," due to "years of repression, conflict and external sanctions"; according to the data, Iraq's under-5 child mortality rate increased from 50 deaths per 1000 births in 1990 to 125 deaths per 1000 births in 2005.

In 2017, researchers Tim Dyson and Valeria Cetorelli described "the rigging of the 1999 Unicef survey" as "an especially masterful fraud," citing that three comprehensive surveys (using full birth histories) conducted with the post-invasion Iraqi government—namely, the 2004 Iraq Living Conditions Survey (ILCS), which was initially discounted by the Volcker Committee for finding far fewer child deaths than expected, and the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) carried out by UNICEF and Iraq's Ministry of Health (MOH) in 2006 and again in 2011—all found that the child mortality rate in the period 1995–2000 was approximately 40 per 1000, which means that "there was no major rise in child mortality in Iraq after 1990 and during the period of the sanctions," although a "slight increase" in child mortality did occur "between 1990 and 1991." As a corollary, "there was no major improvement in child mortality" as a result of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, contrary to claims made by some of its proponents. Per Dyson and Cetorelli, "the UN unobtrusively changed its own U5MR estimates in 2009."

Controversies

Culpability

Scholar Ramon Das, in the Human Rights Research Journal of the New Zealand Center for Public Law, examined each of the "most widely accepted ethical frameworks" in the context of violations of Iraqi human rights under the sanctions, finding that "primary responsibility rests with the UNSC" under these frameworks, including rights-utilitarianism, moral Kantianism, and consequentialism. By contrast, some academics, American and UN officials, and Iraqi citizens contend that this ignores the consequences of allowing Saddam to continue his policies with no deterrence and unlimited capacity.

Controversy about regional differences

Some commentators blame Saddam Hussein for the excess deaths reported during this period. For example, Rubin argued that the Kurdish and the Iraqi governments handled OFFP aid differently, and that therefore the Iraqi government policy, rather than the sanctions themselves, should be held responsible for any negative effects. Likewise, Cortright claimed: "The tens of thousands of excess deaths in the south-center, compared to the similarly sanctioned but UN-administered north, are the result of Baghdad's failure to accept and properly manage the UN humanitarian relief effort." In the run-up to the Iraq War, some disputed the idea that excess mortality exceeded 500,000, because the Iraqi government had interfered with objective collection of statistics (independent experts were barred).

Other Western observers, such as Matt Welch and Anthony Arnove, argue that the differences in results noted by authors such as Rubin may have been because the sanctions were not the same in the two parts of Iraq, due to several regional differences: in the per capita money, in war damage to infrastructure and in the relative ease with which smugglers evaded sanctions through the porous Northern borders. Spagat argued in response that "it is hard to believe that these factors could completely overwhelm the major disadvantages of the Kurdish Zone in which perhaps 20% of the population was internally displaced compared to about 0.3% in the South/Centre" and that the Iraq Family Health Survey (IFHS) suggests a higher (albeit declining) child mortality rate in the Kurdistan Region than elsewhere in Iraq during the mid-1990s.

Arguments about the sanctions and the Iraq War

Protesters in Washington DC against sanctions and invasion of Iraq, 2002 or 2003

Some analysts, such as Walter Russell Mead, accepted a large estimate of casualties due to sanctions, but argued that invading Iraq was better than continuing the sanctions regime, since "Each year of containment is a new Gulf War."

Albright interview

On May 12, 1996, Madeleine Albright (then U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations) appeared on a 60 Minutes segment in which Lesley Stahl (referring to the 1995 FAO study) asked her "We have heard that half a million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?" and Albright replied "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price, we think the price is worth it." Albright wrote later that Saddam Hussein, not the sanctions, was to blame. She criticized Stahl's segment as "amount to Iraqi propaganda"; said that her question was a loaded question; wrote "I had fallen into a trap and said something I did not mean"; and regretted coming "across as cold-blooded and cruel". The segment won an Emmy Award. Albright's "non-denial" was taken by sanctions opponents as confirmation of a high number of sanctions related casualties.

Iraq Inquiry

The Iraq Inquiry led by Sir John Chilcot examined a February 2003 statement by then-British Prime Minister Tony Blair that "today, 135 out of every 1,000 Iraqi children die before the age of five". The inquiry found that the figure in question was provided to Blair by Secretary of State for International Development Clare Short and the Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO) based on the 1999 ICMMS study, but an internal caveat from the FCO and the Department for International Development (DFID) to the effect that the ICMMS was of questionable reliability because it had been "conducted with the Iraqi regime's 'help' and relied on some Iraqi figures" was not communicated to Blair by a 10 Downing Street official. The inquiry noted "The level of child mortality in Iraq estimated by the ICMMS was significantly higher than that estimated by later surveys," citing "estimates that the under‑five mortality rate in Iraq was 55 per 1,000 in 1989, 46 per 1,000 in 1999, 42 per 1,000 in 2003, and 37 per 1,000 in 2010 (when Mr Blair gave his evidence to the Inquiry)."

Lifting of sanctions

Following the 2003 U.S. invasion, the sanctions regime was largely ended on May 22, 2003 (with certain exceptions related to arms and to oil revenue) by paragraph 10 of UNSC Resolution 1483. In December 2010, the UNSC "voted to return control of Iraq's oil and natural gas revenue to the government on 30 June and to end all remaining activities of the ".

Iraq's Chapter VII obligations "concerning the return of Kuwaiti and third-State nationals" were rescinded in June 2013 by Resolution 2107. In December 2021, Iraq's central bank announced that it had paid off its entire debt of $52 billion in war reparations to Kuwait.

Legacy

In a 1998 fatwā, al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden cited the sanctions against Iraq as a justification for attacks against Americans. Bin Laden stated that the sanctions had caused the deaths of 1.5 million Iraqi children in an effort "to destroy Iraq, the most powerful neighboring Arab state."

In a 2015 article in the journal International Affairs, Francesco Giumelli noted that the UNSC had largely abandoned comprehensive sanctions in favor of targeted sanctions since the mid-1990s, with the controversy over the efficacy and civilian harms attributed to the Iraq sanctions playing a significant role in the change: "The sanctions imposed on Iraq in 1990 covered all goods entering or leaving the entire country, whereas those imposed today are most often directed against individuals or non-state entities, and are more limited in scope. ... The widespread view ... that 500,000 Iraqi children died as a result of UN comprehensive sanctions itself rang the death knell for the perceived utility of comprehensive measures." In a similar vein, Albright herself told an interviewer in 2020 that "we learned in many ways that comprehensive sanctions often hurt the people of the country and don't really accomplish what is wanted in order to change the behavior of the country being sanctioned. So we began to look at something called 'smart sanctions' or 'targeted sanctions.'"

See also

References

  1. "Resolution 1483 - UN Security Council - Global Policy Forum". Globalpolicy.org. Retrieved 1 June 2011.
  2. ^ "UN lifts sanctions against Iraq (BBC)". BBC News. 15 December 2010.
  3. "United Nations Security Council Resolution 1956 (December 2010)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 January 2010.
  4. "U.N. council brings Iraq closer to end of 1990s sanctions". Reuters. 27 June 2013. Archived from the original on 27 November 2015. Retrieved 1 July 2017.
  5. ^ "UN Security Council Resolution 661". Fas.org. Archived from the original on 18 August 2000. Retrieved 15 June 2009.
  6. ^ "United Nations Security Council Resolution 687".
  7. "UN Security Council Resolutions relating to Iraq".
  8. ^ MacQueen, Graeme; Nagy, Thomas; Santa Barbara, Joanna; Raichle, Claudia (2004). "'Iraq Water Treatment Vulnerabilities': a challenge to public health ethics". Medicine, Conflict and Survival. 20 (2): 109–119. doi:10.1080/1362369042000234708. ISSN 1362-3699. PMID 15260175.
  9. ^ Garfield, Richard (1 June 2000). "A multivariate method for estimating mortality rates among children under 5 years from health and social indicators in Iraq". International Journal of Epidemiology. 29 (3): 510–515. doi:10.1093/ije/29.3.510. PMID 10869324.
  10. ^ Ascherio, Alberto; Chase, Robert; Coté, Tim; Dehaes, Godelieave; Hoskins, Eric; Laaouej, Jilali; Passey, Megan; Qaderi, Saleh; Shuqaidef, Saher; Smith, Mary C.; Zaidi, Sarah (24 September 1992). "Effect of the Gulf War on Infant and Child Mortality in Iraq". New England Journal of Medicine. 327 (13): 931–936. doi:10.1056/NEJM199209243271306. ISSN 0028-4793. PMID 1513350.
  11. ^ Garfield, Richard (1999). "Morbidity and Mortality among Iraqi Children from 1990 through 1998: Assessing the Impact of the Gulf War and Economic Sanctions". Fourth Freedom Forum & Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame.
  12. ^ Blacker, John; Jones, Gareth; Ali, Mohamed M. (2003). "Annual mortality rates and excess deaths of children under five in Iraq, 1991-98". Population Studies. 57 (2): 217–226. doi:10.1080/0032472032000097119. ISSN 0032-4728. PMID 12888415.
  13. ^ Dyson, Tim; Cetorelli, Valeria (1 July 2017). "Changing views on child mortality and economic sanctions in Iraq: a history of lies, damned lies and statistics". BMJ Global Health. 2 (2): e000311. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000311. ISSN 2059-7908. PMC 5717930. PMID 29225933.
  14. ^ Litwak, Robert (2007). Regime Change: U.S. Strategy through the Prism of 9/11. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 154-155. ISBN 978-0-8018-8642-3.
  15. ^ Fineman, Mark (8 August 1993). "Iraq on Brink of Famine, U.N. Finds : Destitution: Sanctions are blamed. Studies liken nation to 'disaster-stricken African countries.'". Los Angeles Times.
  16. ^ Giumelli, Francesco (November 2015). "Understanding United Nations targeted sanctions: an empirical analysis" (PDF). International Affairs. 91 (6). Oxford University Press: 1351–1368. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12448.
  17. Sciolino, Elaine (1991). The Outlaw State: Saddam Hussein's Quest for Power and the Gulf Crisis. John Wiley & Sons. p. 171. ISBN 9780471542995.
  18. ^ "Fact Sheet". Office of the Iraq Oil-For-Food Programme. 21 November 2003. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
  19. ^ "Iraq-Related Sanctions". United States Department of State. Retrieved 19 September 2011.
  20. ^ "'Goods Review List' for Iraq". United States Department of State. 14 May 2002. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
  21. ^ "In Brief". Office of the Iraq Oil-For-Food Programme. 21 November 2003. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
  22. Schmemann, Serge (9 May 2002). "U.N. Plans Soon to Streamline Application of Iraq Sanctions (Published 2002)". The New York Times – via NYTimes.com.
  23. "Maritime Interception Operations (MIO)". GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved 8 June 2011.
  24. "Voices in the Wilderness Ordered to Pay $20K for Bringing Aid to Iraq". Democracy Now!. 16 August 2005. Retrieved 8 June 2011.
  25. Feith, Douglas J. (2008). War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at the Dawn of the War on Terrorism. New York: HarperCollins. p. 193. ISBN 978-0-06-089973-8.
  26. Cortright, David (19 June 2004). "Containing Iraq: Sanctions Worked". Fourthfreedom.org. Archived from the original on 18 September 2007. Retrieved 30 May 2009.
  27. ^ Cortright, David (November 2001). "A Hard Look at Iraq Sanctions". The Nation.
  28. Cortright, David (11 September 2001). "Containing Iraq: Sanctions Worked". Fourthfreedom.org. Archived from the original on 10 March 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2009.
  29. "Saddam Hussein Talks to the FBI". Gwu.edu. Retrieved 6 July 2009.
  30. Kessler, Glenn (2 July 2009). "Saddam Hussein Said WMD Talk Helped Him Look Strong to Iran". The Washington Post. Retrieved 6 July 2009.
  31. See Statement of the International Progress Organization before the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Sub-Commission on Prevention Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, on UN sanctions against Iraq and human rights, 13 August 1991.
  32. "National Accounts—Analysis of Main Aggregates (AMA): Country Profile". United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, National Accounts Section. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
  33. Crossette, Barbara (18 December 1999). "Divided U.N. Council Approves New Iraq Arms Inspection Plan". The New York Times. Retrieved 8 March 2022.
  34. "Department of State Washington File: Fact Sheet: U.S. Department of State on Iraqi Underspending". Usinfo.org. Retrieved 22 June 2009.
  35. "Oil-for-food chief 'took bribes'". BBC. 8 August 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
  36. G.R. Popal (July 2000). "Impact of sanctions on the population of Iraq". Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 6 (4): 791–5. doi:10.26719/2000.6.4.791. PMID 11794085. S2CID 29571181. Retrieved 3 June 2011.
  37. Adnan Al-Araji (2001). "Iraqi doctors appeal for help from doctors in other countries". The BMJ. 323 (7303): 53. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7303.53/b. JSTOR 25467323. PMC 1120689. PMID 11464839.
  38. John Pilger New Statesman - John Pilger on why we ignored Iraq in the 1990s New Statesman, 4 October 2004
  39. Sophie Boukhari Embargo against Iraq: Crime and punishment UNESCO website.
  40. "BBC News - MIDDLE EAST - UN sanctions rebel resigns". bbc.co.uk.
  41. Neilan, Terence (16 February 2000). "WORLD BRIEFING". The New York Times. Retrieved 24 December 2016. See also "Corrections". The New York Times. 17 February 2000. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  42. Selden, Zachary (1999). Economic Sanctions as Instruments of American Foreign Policy. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 89-90. ISBN 978-0-275-96387-3.
  43. Selden, Zachary (1999). Economic Sanctions as Instruments of American Foreign Policy. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-275-96387-3.
  44. Selden, Zachary (1999). Economic Sanctions as Instruments of American Foreign Policy. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 91. ISBN 978-0-275-96387-3.
  45. Selden, Zachary (1999). Economic Sanctions as Instruments of American Foreign Policy. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 92. ISBN 978-0-275-96387-3.
  46. Selden, Zachary (1999). Economic Sanctions as Instruments of American Foreign Policy. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 93. ISBN 978-0-275-96387-3.
  47. Sassoon, Joseph (February 2017). "Aaron M. Faust, The Ba'thification of Iraq: Saddam Hussein's Totalitarianism [Book Review]". International Journal of Middle East Studies. 49 (1). Cambridge University Press: 205–206. doi:10.1017/S0020743816001392. S2CID 164804585.
  48. ^ Spagat, Michael (September 2010). "Truth and death in Iraq under sanctions" (PDF). Significance. 7 (3). Wiley-Blackwell/Royal Statistical Society: 116–120. doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2010.00437.x. S2CID 154415183.
  49. Zaidi, S.; Fawzi, M. C. (2 December 1995). "Health of Baghdad's children". Lancet. 346 (8988): 1485. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92499-x. ISSN 0140-6736. PMID 7491002.
  50. Zaidi, Sarah (1997). "Child mortality in Iraq". The Lancet. 350 (9084): 1105. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)70470-0. PMID 10213580. S2CID 46466831.
  51. Cortright, David (15 November 2001). "A Hard Look at Iraq Sanctions". The Nation.
  52. ^ Ali, Mohamed M; Shah, Iqbal H (27 May 2000). "Sanctions and childhood mortality in Iraq". The Lancet. 355 (9218): 1851–1857. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02289-3. ISSN 0140-6736. PMID 10866440.
  53. "UNICEF—Results of the 1999 Iraq Child and Maternal Mortality Surveys". Federation of American Scientists. Archived from the original on 25 October 2000. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
  54. ^ Blacker, John; Ali, Mohamed M.; Jones, Gareth (2007). "A response to criticism of our estimates of under-5 mortality in Iraq, 1980-98". Population Studies. 61 (1): 7–13. doi:10.1080/00324720601122031. ISSN 0032-4728. PMID 17365870.
  55. Save the Children (2007). State of the World's Mothers 2007: Saving the Lives of Children Under 5. Save the Children. pp. 25, 27. ISBN 978-1-888393-19-4.
  56. Das, Ramon (2003). "Human Rights and Economic Sanctions in Iraq" (PDF). 1. Human Rights Research Journal: 8–14. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  57. See also the analysis of Hans Köchler, Ethical Aspects of Sanctions in International Law. Penang (Malaysia): Just World Trust (JUST), 1995. ISBN 983-9861-03-4.
  58. Rieff, David (27 July 2003). "Were Sanctions Right? (Published 2003)". The New York Times.
  59. Rubin, Michael (December 2001). "Sanctions on Iraq: A Valid Anti-American Grievance?". 5 (4). Middle East Review of International Affairs: 100–115. Archived from the original on 28 October 2012. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  60. Rubin, Michael (7 June 2001). "Sulaymaniyah Dispatch: Food Fight". The New Republic. Archived from the original on 22 June 2001.
  61. Leitenberg, Milton (2001). "Saddam is the Cause of Iraqis' Suffering". 28. Institute For the Study of Genocide Newsletter. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 20 December 2010. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  62. Crossette, Barbara (12 September 2000). "Iraq Won't Let Outside Experts Assess Sanctions' Impact on Lives". The New York Times. Retrieved 7 December 2010.
  63. ^ Welch, Matt (March 2002). "Reason Magazine - The Politics of Dead Children". Reason.com. Retrieved 6 October 2010.
  64. Arnove, Anthony. (April 2000). Iraq Under Siege: The Deadly Impact of Sanctions and War. South End Press. p. 91.
  65. Murray, Iain (21 March 2003). "Recent Research Suggests ..." United Press International. Archived from the original on 19 March 2005. Retrieved 6 July 2009.
  66. "Deadlier Than War - Council on Foreign Relations". The Washington Post. 12 March 2003. Retrieved 29 June 2009.
  67. Vincent, Norah (7 November 2002). "Leftists Turn Blind Eye to Iraqis' Plight". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 17 November 2002.
  68. LeVine, Mark (7 November 2002). "An Immodest Proposal". OC Weekly. Archived from the original on 3 June 2003. Retrieved 19 April 2010.
  69. ^ Rosen, Mike (15 March 2002). "U.S., U.N. not to blame for deaths of Iraqis". Rocky Mountain News. Archived from the original on 14 April 2002.
  70. "Albright's Blunder". Irvine Review. 2002. Archived from the original on 3 June 2003. Retrieved 4 January 2008.
  71. Albright, Madeleine (2003). Madam Secretary: A Memoir. Miramax Books. pp. 274, 275. ISBN 9780786868438.
  72. Albright, Madeleine (2 May 2006). The mighty and the Almighty ... - Google Books. Harper Collins. ISBN 9780060892579. Retrieved 9 September 2010.
  73. "Lesley Stahl". CBS News. 1998. Retrieved 5 June 2011.
  74. "The Report of the Iraq Inquiry: Report of a Committee of Privy Counsellors: SECTION 17: CIVILIAN CASUALTIES". The National Archives (United Kingdom)/The Stationery Office. 6 July 2016. pp. 174–175. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
  75. "Resolution 1483 - UN Security Council - Global Policy Forum". Globalpolicy.org. Retrieved 30 May 2009.
  76. "Unanimously Adopting Resolution 2107 (2013), Security Council Removes Iraq from Chapter VII Obligations over Return of Kuwaiti Nationals". United Nations. 27 June 2013. Retrieved 24 November 2022.
  77. "Iraq pays final instalment of $52bn war reparations to Kuwait". Middle East Monitor. 23 December 2021. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  78. "Iraq completes fifty-two billion dollar reparations to Kuwait". www.rudaw.net. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  79. Byman, Daniel L. (October 2003). "Review: Al-Qaeda as an Adversary: Do We Understand Our Enemy?". World Politics. 56 (1). Cambridge University Press: 144–145. doi:10.1353/wp.2004.0002. JSTOR 25054248. S2CID 154862540.
  80. Marchese, David (25 April 2020). "Madeleine Albright Thinks It's Good When America Gets Involved". The New York Times. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
Iraq Iraq topics
History
Chronology
638–1958
Republic
Geography
Politics
Economy
Society
Demographics
General
Categories:
International sanctions against Iraq: Difference between revisions Add topic