| Revision as of 18:02, 22 July 2011 edit98.191.220.101 (talk) →Classification of "Heir"← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:52, 6 December 2024 edit undoZ. Patterson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,614 editsNo edit summary | ||
| (27 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Talkpage header}} | |||
| {{WikiProject Law|class=Start|importance=Top}} | |||
| {{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|vital=yes|1= | ||
| {{WikiProject Law|importance=Top}} | |||
| {{WikiProject Death|importance=high}} | |||
| }} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 256K | |||
| |counter = 8 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 5 | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| |algo = old(30d) | |||
| |archive = Talk:Will and testament/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| ==Title of article should be revised== | |||
| The title of this article should either be ''Last'' will and testament; or simply Wills. The latter generally is preferred; but the salient point in any case is that the document records you ''last'' will, in the original sense of the verb and noun. | |||
| ==2006== | |||
| :The title perhaps should be "Will (law)". There apparently was a redirect from "Will(law)" (no space) but I don't know the history and the issue with that redirect may have been the absence of a space. ] (]) 22:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Anyone know what the UK statute is which governs the creation of wills? | |||
| *I'm hoping someone with more up-to-date knowledge than mine will leap in, here, but a starting point is the Wills Act 1837 (especially section 9). ] 10:20, 7 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Sadly that act still governs New Zealand! Despite which I am seriously worried this article states what the law is without saying which country that law applies to. There is more the world that the U.S. of A. and England, dammit! :-)] 04:08, 18 June 2006 (UTC)]] 04:08, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, there are several acts that govern the UK Wills area. There is the 1925 Estate act and also the UK succession act. The UK succession act ammended in 2005 should be what you are after. There is also little difference in legal aspects from amongst the aforementioned counteries since all their original law structures were english. Thomas - www.global-wills.com | |||
| ==What to do with a Will after it is signed?== | |||
| Should the article contain any explanation of what to do with a will after it is created and signed? To whom should copies be given? What should be done with the original? Is it necessary or desirable to have a lawyer keep it? How does the will end up in the hands of the Probate Judge? I don't know the answers, but it might be important. ] 19:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==How old to write a will?== | |||
| How old do you have to be to make a will in the UK? ] 21:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Howard Hughes== | |||
| According to wikipedia's Howard Hughes site, Howard Hughes died with a will. I think the person who included that information was getting his syntax confused. Howard Hughes died with a will, but it was created before the birth of his son, so his son was a pretermitted son and was given a son's share of Howard Hughes, Sr.'s estate. I will leave it to someone else to investigate and change. | |||
| == Civil law wills? == | |||
| Are there wills in the civil law system? If so, it seems like serious bias for an article called "Wills (law)" to be about only common-law wills. If not, something in the article should mention and link to property disposition in the civil law system - maybe just a brief section that says something like "Wills do not exist in the civil law system. Instead, property is distributed through " ] 05:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Wills do exist in the civil law system, but those jurisdictions have a very different statutory framework for the settlement of decedent's estates. For example, ], the ], ], and ] are frequently encountered.] (]) 17:58, 22 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Article incomplete == | |||
| How about some material on how a will is executed, what the executor does, what the lawyer does, what the probate court does. How is final settlement achieved? If a man's estate consists of $10,000 in savings and he leaves $7,500 to each of two sons, what happens? If a woman has a house and $10,000 and leaves the house to one of two daughters and $50,000 to the other, what happens? There's just a whole lot more to a will than is covered here. ] 17:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Actually, perhaps the above considerations belong in the article on probate. But they are not covered there either.] 17:45, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Wills and life insurance == | |||
| Someone has a life insurance policy on my life. He is the owner, he pays the premiums, he is also the beneficiary. I don't want him to be. He will not change the policy and list who I do wnnt as the beneficiary. If I write a will and say who I want to be the beneficiary of my life insurance, will this superceed the insurance policy? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:17, 18 December 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Who can view a Will == | |||
| Have a situation where an Uncle revoked current durable power of Attorney while the person is suffering from dimensia. He is a brother and the previous holder was a niece. Now as durable power of attorney thinks he has the right to see the will of the person he represents as dpoa. Does this not violate the rights of the testator? | |||
| I think he wants to change the executor and thinks he has that right as holding of Durable power of Attorney(limited to financial matters only) | |||
| ] (]) 23:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Inappropriate link == | == Inappropriate link == | ||
| The link to Rockwill seems totally inappropriate. | The link to Rockwill seems totally inappropriate. | ||
| :This appears to be resolved. ] (]) 22:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Video wills? == | |||
| == Need Help Correcting an Error == | |||
| This is the first time that I ever tried to correct a Misplaced Pages article so rather than screw it up I thought that I would let a professional handle it. | |||
| In the Article it says "Though most people are aware that they need a will, as many as 66% of Americans, according to Consumer Reports, don't have one." The correct number should be 56% and not 66%. This number is derived from a Consumer Reports Article located at http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/babies-kids/baby-toddler/money-tips-for-new-parents-10-07/your-will-a-how-to-for-new-parents/your-will-a-how-to-for-new-parents.htm?view=Print where it is stated that "Just about everybody needs a will, but only 44 percent of Americans have one, according to a recent survey." If 44% have a will then 56% don't have a will. It can't be 66% not having a will because that would add up to 110% (44%+66%=110%). | |||
| ] (]) 18:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Classification of "Heir" == | |||
| The text states that a testator must clearly define an heir in their will; however, an heir is a creation of intestate administration. A person entitled to property in an intestate administration (where there was no will by the decedent) is an heir. During their lifetime, the person is an heir apparent, and only after the decedent's death are they classified as an heir. | |||
| The proper term for the individual who should be clearly defined in a will is a devisee. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| Heirs are persons who take by intestate succession. A person who takes under a will is a devisee. It is possible for a person to be both an heir or a devisee (e.g. the testator leaves the property to someone who would have inherited it anyway under the law of intestate succession).] (]) 18:02, 22 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Louisiana == | |||
| The article says "except in Louisiana, where a minimum share is guaranteed to surviving children." This is obsolete. Since 1989 only minor (under age 23) and disabled children are subject to (beneficiaries of) "forced heirship" in Louisiana today. See: Spaht, Katherine Shaw, Kathryn Venturatos Lorio, Cynthia Picou, Cynthia Samuel & Frederick W. Swain, Jr., "The New Forced Heirship Legislation: A Regrettable 'Revolution' ", 50 La. L. Rev., 1990, pp. 409-99. | |||
| ] (]) 07:52, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Copyright violation? == | |||
| Based on the way it is written, and the lack of citations, I believe there is a good chance that this article was copied directly from another source and may be a copyright violation. Can anyone confirm that? | |||
| ] (]) 08:42, 27 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| === Civil law wills - reply === | |||
| Of course there are wills in civil law systems. I have myself made wills in Spain and Brazil; though many people do not. The issue of wills should not be confused with the degree of testamentary freedom. | |||
| How to handle this? The ideal woul be to have a general article on wills, covering the main differences and commonalties between common and civil law; and put the detail into separate articles on wills in different specific legal systems. For Brazil say, it would probably be better to link to a Portuguese article than to fudge one in English. | |||
| --James Wimberley] (]) 01:15, 8 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Warren Burger - dubious == | |||
| The statement about Warren Burger's will costing his estate thousands is based on dubious claims and should probably be removed. I have marked it dubious in the article. See article at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1585397 whose abstract claims: | |||
| "Media reports of Warren Burger's homemade three-sentence will crowed about the former Chief Justice's lack of legal acumen in drafting the will. A local attorney alleged that Burger's $1.6 million estate would incur a $450,000 federal and state estate tax liability that could have been entirely avoided by elementary estate planning, noting that "the shoemaker's children are the last ones to get shoes." | |||
| The article mentions holographic wills and dictated wills, but what about video wills? They've been around for decades now! It seems like it would be hard to claim that a video will doesn't reflect the intentions of the maker, so they should be at least as valid as holographic wills, but what does the law actually say? ] (]) 03:54, 26 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
| It was a great story - if only it were true. This article examines the estate tax consequences of the Burger will and concludes that it is the critics, not the Chief Justice, who do not understand basic estate planning." | |||
| : The answer to that depends upon the jurisdiction. In the jurisdictions I'm familiar with, the concept of a video will is a bit of a misnomer, with its being a video that should be prepared and presented in association with a written will that meets the requirements of state law. It may be a subtopic worth developing, if somebody wants to take it on and can find appropriate sources. ] (]) 22:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| The article goes on to state that a media frenzy based on a single person's incorrect claims created this enduring myth about Warren Burger's will. If others agree this claim is not true, please remove it from the article. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15#Will(law)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 21:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :This appears to have been resolved with the deletion of the redirect. ] (]) 22:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:52, 6 December 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Will and testament article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Title of article should be revised
The title of this article should either be Last will and testament; or simply Wills. The latter generally is preferred; but the salient point in any case is that the document records you last will, in the original sense of the verb and noun.
- The title perhaps should be "Will (law)". There apparently was a redirect from "Will(law)" (no space) but I don't know the history and the issue with that redirect may have been the absence of a space. Arllaw (talk) 22:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Inappropriate link
The link to Rockwill seems totally inappropriate.
- This appears to be resolved. Arllaw (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Video wills?
The article mentions holographic wills and dictated wills, but what about video wills? They've been around for decades now! It seems like it would be hard to claim that a video will doesn't reflect the intentions of the maker, so they should be at least as valid as holographic wills, but what does the law actually say? Critterkeeper (talk) 03:54, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- The answer to that depends upon the jurisdiction. In the jurisdictions I'm familiar with, the concept of a video will is a bit of a misnomer, with its being a video that should be prepared and presented in association with a written will that meets the requirements of state law. It may be a subtopic worth developing, if somebody wants to take it on and can find appropriate sources. Arllaw (talk) 22:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
"Will(law)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Will(law) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15 § Will(law) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- This appears to have been resolved with the deletion of the redirect. Arllaw (talk) 22:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)