| Revision as of 01:05, 25 July 2011 editChzz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users115,894 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Zhi Gang Sha. (TW) | Latest revision as of 04:15, 11 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''keep'''. ] <sup>]] ]]</sup> 06:21, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}} | |||
| :{{la|Zhi Gang Sha}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) | :{{la|Zhi Gang Sha}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) | ||
| :({{Find sources|Zhi Gang Sha}}) | :({{Find sources|Zhi Gang Sha}}) | ||
| Doesn't seem ] - lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources; most refs are self-published, others are entries for books in listings - no substantial content. The few remaining are not enough information to support an appropriate ]; it isn't ], and is somewhat promotional. Contested PROD. <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">]]</span></small> 01:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC) | Doesn't seem ] - lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources; most refs are self-published, others are entries for books in listings - no substantial content. The few remaining are not enough information to support an appropriate ]; it isn't ], and is somewhat promotional. Contested PROD. <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">]]</span></small> 01:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| '''Weak keep''' - there are reliable sources available, from '']'', from the '']'' (behind paywall), and from '']'' (behind paywall). I think there is marginally enough coverage to satisfy the notability guidelines. I do think that the article does have content issues, and uses the subject's website as a source inappropriately, but I think there is enough in the sources to make a more neutral article. <span style="font-family:Franklin Gothic;">]] | ]</span> 12:21, 25 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep''' I stubbed the article and added in some reliable sources. As it stands now, the article is fully sourced and neutral. ] (]) 14:56, 25 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| --- | |||
| *'''Withdraw nomination''' - '''keep''' - ], nice work; fine. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">]]</span></small> 06:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| --- | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 04:15, 11 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ed 06:21, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Zhi Gang Sha
- Zhi Gang Sha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem notable - lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources; most refs are self-published, others are entries for books in listings - no substantial content. The few remaining are not enough information to support an appropriate biographic article; it isn't neutral, and is somewhat promotional. Contested PROD. Chzz ► 01:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Weak keep - there are reliable sources available, from Wired, from the Toronto Star (behind paywall), and from St. Petersburg Times (behind paywall). I think there is marginally enough coverage to satisfy the notability guidelines. I do think that the article does have content issues, and uses the subject's website as a source inappropriately, but I think there is enough in the sources to make a more neutral article. Quasihuman | Talk 12:21, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I stubbed the article and added in some reliable sources. As it stands now, the article is fully sourced and neutral. Qrsdogg (talk) 14:56, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
---
- Withdraw nomination - keep - WP:HEY, nice work; fine. Thanks, Chzz ► 06:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
---
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.