Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Solas nua: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:06, 25 July 2011 editQrsdogg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers6,586 edits Solas nua: k← Previous edit Latest revision as of 08:14, 3 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''. ] 00:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}


:{{la|Solas nua}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) :{{la|Solas nua}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>)
Line 11: Line 17:
:*Added links to profiles by ] & ] ] (]) 23:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC) :*Added links to profiles by ] & ] ] (]) 23:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
::*IP editor is new and has only contributed to the article and this debate. ] (] • ]) 04:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC) ::*IP editor is new and has only contributed to the article and this debate. ] (] • ]) 04:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
:::*Comment on the content, not the contributor. ] (]) 20:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
<hr style="width:55%;" /> <hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 23:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->] :<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 23:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
<hr style="width:55%;" /> <hr style="width:55%;" />
*'''Keep''' Meets ] on the basis of the Irish Times and NPR coverage. ] (]) 16:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC) *'''Keep''' Meets ] on the basis of the Irish Times and NPR coverage. ] (]) 16:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 08:14, 3 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles 00:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Solas nua

Solas nua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the GNG. Also significant conflict of interest with creator listed as "social media manager" on given external link - the tone is bad. Raymie (tc) 06:32, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep I have given the article a serious going-over and removed 90% of the puffery that was there, together with adding links and corrections. What is left is brief but I would consider this an established and notable arts organisation - there are quite a number of hits on an internet search. asnac (talk) 08:21, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Solas nua: Difference between revisions Add topic