| Revision as of 19:27, 26 November 2011 editJakew (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,277 editsm Reverted edits by Raidskill (talk) to last version by Secret← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:08, 6 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,310,540 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Jayjg/Archive 43) (bot | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 125K | |maxarchivesize = 125K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 43 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 3 | |minthreadsleft = 3 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(7d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Jayjg/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Jayjg/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{/WelcomeNotice}} | {{/WelcomeNotice}} | ||
| {{AutoArchivingNotice|bot=MiszaBot III|age=14|small=yes}} | |||
| {{archives|auto=yes}} | {{archives|auto=yes|age=7|bot=MiszaBot III}} | ||
| {{busy|small=yes}} | {{busy|small=yes}} | ||
| <br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/> | <br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/> | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| == 3rr == | |||
| Has this user broken 3rr? | |||
| * 1st revert | |||
| * 2nd revert | |||
| * 3rd revert | |||
| * 4th revert | |||
| He's also ignoring my concerns on the talk page ] ] 16:37, 12 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :It's complicated, but it appears to me that he has broken 3RR. I've warned him. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 16:46, 13 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for the warning though it was never my intention to break 3RR or attempt to act in any way contrary to good practice. (After nearly 10,000 edits over 4 years, I believe this is my first 'warning'.) The first change I made was to write an article in place of a redirect that had been done by a different editor over a year and a half ago. It was not returning that editors work to the previous version and after such a length of time I did not consider my actions amounted to a 'revert' (though I can see why some may consider it to be.) The second alleged revert was me doing what the tag said - removing the tag if I objected to it (which I did) - I didn't think that would count as a revert either! You will notice that I also tried to discuss the matter on talk, and by sending a personal message to the other editor. The other two examples were then caused by me trying to improve the article to prove it merited separate existence but being prevented from doing so by having it completely reverted by an editor as I was in the middle of improving it! Fortunately, I can report that matters appear to be headed towards a good outcome as I apologised to the other editor for any offence I caused, though unintentional, and the other editor has responded positively. A compromise suggestion has been posted on talk that appears to have support. Cheers ] (]) 17:50, 13 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::I agree that one could argue the second "revert" is not a revert ''per se'', but merely following the template instructions. In any event, I'm glad you are both working it out now. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 19:35, 13 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == British jew == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| Hi - Get a better jew for the infobox - he has an Irish catholic father and is a self declared atheist. - You should at least get full jews for the infobox. Are there no famous practicing Jews with two jewish parents you can add to the infobox? ] (]) 00:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| :"Get a better jew"? Seriously? Radcliffe isn't Jewish enough for you? Why isn't he a "full jew" - is this some sort of racial thing? ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 01:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| ::], my apologies if my actions at the article may have raised suspicions a-la ], as someone suggested. That I'm even awake at these hours is itself exceedingly unusual. I have your Talk page watchlisted, though, and that outrageous "better jew" comment was more than I could bear.—] (]) 01:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| :::Don't worry about it; I'm sure Off2riorob will soon calm down and apologize. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 03:47, 16 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == MJs == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| Long-term disruption is I believe sufficient grounds for requesting review of user conduct and/or administrative review, isn't it? I grant that you might question my own objectivity on the matter, but I don't doubt that you probably know the polices and guidelines better than I do. Having said that, I can't see any particular reason to go ahead with some sort of action, should you be so inclined. ] (]) 22:33, 18 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :In theory it should be. However, the fact that he goes away for a month or two at a time, then returns for a day of disruption before leaving again, tends to make it hard for these things to stick. The problem is never "urgent" because by the time it gets to any place enforcement can happen, he's disappeared again. On top of that, he often makes bold-faced assertions that are completely at variance with reality, but said with such conviction that they confuse any reader who is unwilling to spend a lot of time digging into diffs. Add to that the fact that he now has an enabler, whose only real interest in this situation is a dislike of me, and it gets messy. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 19:08, 24 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Your'e probably right. I have been involved with an RfC/U of an editor who regularly disappeared for months at after receiving complaints, though, and at least that single RfC seemed to have been effective. And at least one Falun Gong supporter had engaged in almost identical "disruption for a day, disappear for a month or so" activity before being recently banned from the topic indefinitely. Maybe an RfC/U might be the best way to go, if one were filed shortly after an incident of disruption? ] (]) 21:35, 25 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == Semi-protection of "Talk:Human Rights" == | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
| == Mink (manga) == | |||
| Can I ask you for a more detailed explanation of why you semi-protected this page? Per your edit summary it was due to "Persistent sock puppetry" - but as far as I can tell there was only one edit by a sockpuppet, which you reverted in minutes, and before that the last posting on the talk page was some productive discussion we had a month back in October. WP:SEMI says that such protection should be used only sparingly on talk pages and "when they have been subject to persistent disruption". I am sure you had good reason for the protection, but it was not obvious to me why semi-protection was necessary for the page so I was hoping you could fill me in on the background? ] (]) 19:24, 24 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :While this particular sockpuppet made only one edit to this particular talk page, his behavior in general is to continually create new sockpuppets, add the disruptive material again and again to the article (or talk page) until it is semi-protected - see, for example, ], where he did this with six different accounts/IPs before the page was protected. If all of his target pages are protected, he'll get bored and go away. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 21:48, 24 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ok, Thanks ] (]) 21:56, 24 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| I am interested in recreating the article for ]. I am not sure how the original article looked, but I have since found more sources for the article, including and a from '']''. ] (]) 00:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit warring == | |||
| == Deletion review for ] == | |||
| Please see - http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Off2riorob_reported_by_Nomoskedasticity_.28talk.29_.28Result:_.29 here] - ] (]) 20:25, 24 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| An editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRV notice --> ] (]) 03:22, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, I see you've now been blocked for 48 hours. I think you got off light. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 21:12, 24 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:08, 6 January 2025
| Thanks for visiting my Talk: page.
If you are considering posting something to me, please: *Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
Comments which fail to follow the four rules above may be immediately archived or deleted. Thanks again for visiting. |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Mink (manga)
I am interested in recreating the article for Mink (manga). I am not sure how the original article looked, but I have since found more sources for the article, including an interview with the author about the creation of the series and a review from Da Vinci. lullabying (talk) 00:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Deletion review for Mink (manga)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Mink (manga). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. lullabying (talk) 03:22, 6 January 2025 (UTC)