| Revision as of 14:55, 20 February 2012 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,589,558 editsm Substing templates: {{uw-3RR}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:53, 28 December 2024 edit undoSomedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,474 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: cleanupTag: Manual revert | ||
| (952 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ---------------------------------------------------- | |||
| == OWS Demographics change == | |||
| ---------------------------------------------------- | |||
| Why did you remove conservatives and the reference as undue weight? I read the article and it mentions a conservative teacher. Could you clarify. I lean towards inclusion of that. The reference is valid, reliable and contains the information. What is the undue weight that you see?--] (]) 12:35, 23 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {{in5|50}}<span style="font-size:120%"><span style="font-family:Garamond;"></span></span> | |||
| :Never mind...it is. A google search shows nothing in the form of actual articles and a mention of a single conservative teacher in one is undue weight at this time.--] (]) 12:42, 23 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {{in5|55}}<span style="font-size:300%"><span style="font-family:Garamond;">]</span></span> | |||
| == Update == | |||
| ---------------------------------------------------- | |||
| Sorry about taking the union stuff out. That was not my intention, and I think the article is better now that you re-added the two union edits. Happy editing, ] (]) 14:03, 11 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ---------------------------------------------------- | |||
| ---------------------------------------------------- | |||
| == AN/I == | |||
| ---------------------------------------------------- | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. --] (]) 11:09, 14 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Related to the above message; please respect your other editors and ]. It doesn't have to be long - it can be anything as short as "reply", "note" or "comment" on a talk page - but try to make it descriptive (i.e. "adding source", "changing wording", etc). Thank you, ] 11:32, 14 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Gold Standard IP == | |||
| I've asked Ed to take a look at the new IP address our friend is using now and to block it for evasion. No reason to do anything until then as they'll just keep pushing their POV. I did chuckle at their first post (Oh, look, I'm unblocked! Right...). <b><font color="darkred">]</font></b> <font color="black">(])</font> 03:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Just to let you know that your excellent work at the OWS articles has not gone unnoticed. ] (]) 09:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Crime/Security Concerns/Security== | |||
| I've brought the discussion back ] again. Since you recently editted OWS, I am extending an invite to you.] (]) 04:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Tag removal from ] == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | |||
| == 3RR == | |||
| Just a heads up, I noticed that you've violated 3RR on the ] article with , and were reported for edit warring at ]. I would suggest opening a discussion on the article's talk page concerning the <nowiki>{{citation needed}}</nowiki> tags and come up with a ] concerning their use on the article, because there's no rule that a general tag precludes the use of citation needed tags. Take care. - ]] 14:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:53, 28 December 2024