Revision as of 19:00, 17 May 2012 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 4d) to User talk:Roger Davies/Archive 25.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:10, 17 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,311,118 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Roger Davies/Archive 2025) (bot | ||
(1,000 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOINDEX__ | __NOINDEX__ | ||
⚫ | {{Top icon | imagename = Milhist coordinator emeritus.svg | wikilink = Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators | description = This user is a coordinator emeritus of the Military history WikiProject | id = 1}} | ||
<div class="metadata topicon" style="right: 10px;"><imagemap> | |||
⚫ | {{Top icon | imagename = Admin mop.PNG | wikilink = Misplaced Pages:Administrators | description = This user is an administrator| id = 2}} | ||
Image:Milhist coordinator emeritus.svg|25px|This user is lead coordinator of the Military history WikiProject | |||
⚫ | |||
desc none | |||
</imagemap></div> | |||
<div class="metadata topicon" style="right: 40px;"><imagemap> | |||
Image:Admin mop.PNG|20px|This user is an administrator | |||
⚫ | |||
desc none | |||
</imagemap></div> | |||
<div class="metadata topicon" style="right: 70px;"><imagemap> | |||
Image:Arbitration fez.png|20px|This user is a member of the Arbitration Committee | |||
rect 0 0 1000 1000 ] | |||
desc none | |||
</imagemap></div> | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = |
|maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
|counter = 25 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 1 | |minthreadsleft = 1 | ||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
|algo = old(4d) | |algo = old(4d) | ||
|archive = User talk:Roger Davies/Archive %( |
|archive = User talk:Roger Davies/Archive %(year)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
<small><center>ARCHIVES: ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]</ |
<small><div class="center">ANNUAL ARCHIVES: ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]</div></small> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
⚫ | == ''The Signpost'': 15 January 2025 == | ||
<div class="plainlinks nounderlines" style="border: 1px silver solid; padding: 1px; background: white; margin-bottom: 1em; "><div style="border: 1px solid maroon; padding: 2em; background: ivory; text-align: center; color:maroon">'''''If you are here about an arbitration matter, please post instead on the appropriate arbitration page to keep discussion centralised.'''''<br /><br /><div style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;"><br />'''''If you post a message on this page, I'll reply here to avoid fragmenting the discussion. So add it to your watchlist.<br />If I leave you a message on your talk page, it will be added to my watchlist. So feel free to reply to it there instead of here.<br />Please sign and date your message by typing four tildes <nowiki>(~~~~)</nowiki>'''''</div></div></div> | |||
<br /> | |||
== Banned or not == | |||
Hello. You mentioned the conduct of a party in a current ArbComm review towards a "banned user", who is presumably the person who at one time operated the account {{user|Echigo mole}}. There is no evidence that this person has in fact been banned at all (although one party has repeated the claim on numerous occasions). Perhaps it would be a good opportunity for AC to rule on that issue. It would seem to be covered by objective (1) of the review's terms of reference, and it seems that there is no objection to extending the scope of the remedies to user who were not explicitly mentioned at the outset. Until then, it seems incorrect to use refer to that person in this way. Thanks. ] (]) 16:14, 13 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Not wanting to prejudge this but is there any need for ArbCom to get involved? Echigo mole is indefinitely blocked for socking and, at first sight, because of their history ], it seems unlikely any admin would unblock them. This is how a block becomes what's known as a ]. Nevertheless, they could request an unblock on their talk page and see what happens. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:46, 13 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Just to clarify, then, it seems that this person, whoever they may be, is to be regarded as banned, and this entitles any user to revert any posting that they think might have been written by them, without fornmality, and irrespective of any other considerations? This seems an open invitation to abuse, but I only want to clarify the situation -- if that's what ArbComm wants ... ] (]) 21:21, 13 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::Given the history of abuse by IP editors on that IP range, yes, that's pretty much correct. The purpose of Misplaced Pages is to build an encyclopedia not to let random people turn up when they like just to take potshots at various established editors. ] <sup>]</sup> 09:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Amazigh == | |||
Wikimedia received an inquiry that involved Amazigh. I see you are active in Wikiproject Morocco, and have consdierable language skills so I thought I'd check with you. Do you know the language?--]] 13:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Nope, it's Berber, which I don't know at all, I'm afraid. The guy who does speak some/it is ]. He's not been around much lately but he does have email anabled and he is very helpful. I hope this helps, ] <sup>]</sup> 14:20, 14 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::Thanks, I tried FayssalF, but saw no recent activity. However, I'll try email.--]] 15:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | == ''The Signpost'': |
||
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2012-05-14}} | |||
</div><!--Volume 8, Issue 20--> | |||
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> | |||
* ''']''' | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] (]) 23:35, 14 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0269 --> | |||
== User bugging me == | |||
Hi Roger, | |||
I have disclosed my other account that I currently do not use to Arbcom (to you). Now a user who has previously started an Arbcom case against me is bugging me with accusations of me being a sock puppet. Can you please have a look at the discussion and stop this. ] | |||
Ever since he failed to get me kicked of the project with that Arbcom case he is bugging me with the same insinuations | |||
thanks, --] (]) 15:37, 16 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
:I did not make any accusations of sock puppetry, and that was never my intent. What I was looking for was if there was any conditions on the change. The impression I had was that your account would be limited to being a SPA. ] (]) 23:11, 16 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
== clean start account == | |||
::<small>Copied from ] for context.</small> I'm here following a request on my talk page. POVbrigand is a ] account not, strictly, an alternate account. The older account was disclosed to ArbCom last year. There's no time overlap (ie the older account was abandoned several weeks before POVbrigand started editing); there are no overlapping article edits; and the previous account's block log is clean. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:21, 16 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
In reference to your comment here: . I thought clean start applied only to accounts that there was no intention to ever use again? Particularly: ''The old account must be clearly discontinued'', I'm unsure if this refers to de-activated or simply not used. ] (]) 23:07, 16 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
: Not editing for a year seems "clearly discontinued" to me. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:30, 17 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::But there is an intention to re-use the older account at some future stage. ] (]) 13:44, 17 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Also, the reason why I asked was I was curious if there were any specific topic limitations placed on the account, i.e cold fusion only. ] (]) 13:46, 17 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::In that case, it's a (dormant) alternate account after all. It's unrestricted. Now I don't know where this is leading but unless you get there very quickly, it's unlikely I will have anything constructive to add. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:51, 17 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15}} </div><!--Volume 21, Issue 1--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * ''']''' * ] * ] * ] (]) 07:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script (]) --></div></div> | |||
::::I'm not leading anywhere, that's all I was trying to find out. Cheers. ] (]) 13:55, 17 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1269316164 --> |
Latest revision as of 17:10, 17 January 2025
ANNUAL ARCHIVES: 2007 • 2008 • 2009 • 2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019 • 2020 • 2021 • 2022 • 2023
The Signpost: 15 January 2025
- From the editors: Looking back, looking forward
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2024
- In the media: Will you be targeted?
- Technology report: New Calculator template brings interactivity at last
- Opinion: Reflections one score hence
- Serendipity: What we've left behind, and where we want to go next
- Arbitration report: Analyzing commonalities of some contentious topics