| Revision as of 11:14, 17 June 2012 editWilliamJE (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers132,561 edits →Asking for advice: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:03, 19 January 2025 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,385,862 editsm Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:The Bushranger/Archive38. (BOT) | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| |header={{talkarchive}} | |header={{talkarchive}} | ||
| |maxarchsize=125000 | |maxarchsize=125000 | ||
| |numberstart= |
|numberstart=13 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{Notice|<br> | {{Notice|<br> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| *If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you ''will'' be reverted...and ''''''.}} | *If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you ''will'' be reverted...and ''''''.}} | ||
| {{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{ |
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{Togneme Userbox}} | ||
| {{ |
{{Archives|search=yes|list=] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] -<br/> ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ]}} | ||
| {{clear}} | |||
| ⚫ | == A goat for you! == | ||
| ] | |||
| == Possible Ryan Kirkpatrick sighting== | |||
| Thank you for taking care of IntrepidContributor. I ended up needing to help my neighbor for much of the afternoon and didn't get to look at ANI. And thank you to {{u|Objective3000}} and other folks for being patient. I'm a firm believer in ] and if you can give a user that last chance then no one can complain. | |||
| ] ] 06:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Here and. Editor is here. The spelling in the car crash article is very Ryanish.] 23:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| <br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| ⚫ | :I try to keep things good instead of baaaa-aaaad. Thanks! - ] <sub>]</sub> 06:49, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::I suppose the only way to remove him from the Kenya crash article is to take it to AfD? I'd be happy to have it deleted and Userfied to me, but I guess that's not permitted. ] (]) 00:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::It'd be Kept at AfD; I can revdel his edits though... - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 00:25, 13 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Nice work, it's like he was never there. ] (]) 08:28, 13 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| {{unindent}}I reckon it's worth keeping an eye on . It could be just a drongo having a bit of 'fun' but my spidey sense is tingling a bit. 06:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == About Janessian == | |||
| *Noticed a editing aviation articles, FYI. ] ] 20:59, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :...either that's a ], or he's simply stopped trying... - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 22:22, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Worth a check user. No damage so far, just adding poor images to articles that are already jam packed. ] ] 22:28, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| ::::FWIW the user says his name is Ryan Kirkpatrick on commons! example ] ] (]) 22:42, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::{{facepalm|supreme}} - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 22:43, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I think he should get a barnstar for persistence, problem is which account should it be awarded to?!! I've cleaned up the aircraft articles. ] ] 23:08, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| {{unindent}}Just so you are aware, as a sock he has added images in the past; all were copyvios. ] (]) 01:33, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::From a quick look at his commons contributions, they may well be taken by him, although he does still seem to have a problem with adding correct copyright tags. They are not of sufficient quality, however, that there will be a great rush to add them to articles.] (]) 09:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| @], its Nelson. I would want to thank you for the matter. I am glad that you and the others helped out in this case; the matter had been affecting me personally. Still, I have a concern that he might retaliate again despite the block and might go further on. | |||
| ==DYK for Victor Gonzalez, Jr.== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |style = notice | |||
| |small = | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that ''']''' was the first ] driver to compete in a major ] event?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Victor Gonzalez, Jr.|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Victor Gonzalez, Jr.|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }} ] (] '''·''' ]) 16:03, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I had not responded to him directly because I do not wish to make enemies or increase the conflict, and even gave him chances. I am shocked and saddened that he would be going after me for the photo issue when it could be easily resolved in another, perhaps an even better way and somehow, I was singled out. It was my interest in crime that made me come here years ago and he said a lot of things, whether indirect or direct, and yeah it affected me for the week throughout. ] (]) 04:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ==Question== | |||
| ⚫ | :Alas, some people just are that way. If they evade the block, the socks will be instablocked from here out. - ] <sub>]</sub> 04:16, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| *To be clear, was appropriate? Some anon garbage truck came by to stalk/troll me about this, saying that I'm biting the n00b. Problem is, the n00b has so far contributed nothing constructive out of his 25 edits, only 3 were in article pages while the rest are in beautifying his user page like what Facebook, myspace or friendster was made for in the first place of social networking. Am I wrong? Because, if I'm wrong then god forbid that I've tagged more than a dozen such individuals here on WP with such problems/symptoms. Thoughts? <small>(PS: Thanks for your help in reverting that smelly garbage truck on my page. And yes, he has evolved from them stinky socks, ala Pokemon style. God bless him/her~!)</small> --<small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 16:22, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::@]. Maybe you are right. One thing about the murder victim photos, is that at one point, he believed I used female murder victims for some purpose, but it is not true. It can't be helped but one coincidence is that a majority of the murder victims I covered happen to be female, plus I also got photos of male murder victims and yet he at first did not go after me for them before he went on to say all the murder victim photos should be taken down, and involved everyone else who wrote crime like me. Honestly, I do not mind taking down the photos on the ], where his first of edits began (and they formed his reason behind the arguments), but I cannot find a legitimate or explainable reason about taking down the other images (and I took into account the disagreements of the other guys who commented on the issue). | |||
| :*Wow~! The dumpster sure works fast on a Friday... ~? --<small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 16:55, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::He also said that articles must not follow the newspaper facts and said they are not true and the truth must be verified by the police or to go interview the victims' families. But many wiki crime editors used newspapers as reference and there would have been Sanctions on the papers if the facts reported were not true, so the argument frankly did not hold. ] (]) 04:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::*If nothing else, that's a ] that smells strongly of ] - notice how prominently Tatra C.S. is mentioned. I've reverted the ipv6's revert accordingly. - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 17:04, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::@] Should Janessian's sock also have TPA revoked? ] (]) 04:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :::Good call, thanks. - ] <sub>]</sub> 04:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::*He's back at it again, that pitiful stalker of mine is claerly using several IPs to do his bidding at reverting the ]. --<small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 01:46, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Greetings -- Dave asked me for a neutral opinion. User pages which look like Misplaced Pages articles range between two extremes with a lot of gray in the middle. Once a Misplaced Pages editor has a considerable amount (yes, big gray area, I know) of good work on the project, there's pretty much no problem with making a user page that looks like a Misplaced Pages article, about that person. I've never noticed an objection to an experienced editor doing that. If the person has made no, or very few edits, then it appears to be use of Misplaced Pages as a free web host in order to get a highly placed Google hit on one's vanity page -- not kosher. My recommendation for Riyas202 (I presume you are reading this) -- do some good work on Misplaced Pages, and then after a few months of good work you will have more latitude. I also strongly recommend putting some sort of disclaimer at the top of your article, if you do ever rewrite it, "Note: this page is not a Misplaced Pages article, but rather a user page for a Misplaced Pages editor." You can use <nowiki>{{userpage}}</nowiki>, or something similar. Cheers, ] ] 02:01, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::That's my position too. Just the userpage, with very few other edits...it smells. One could say it's an unusual application of ]. He keeps adding it back, though. Protection time? - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 02:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::::*BR, do you remember that time I reverted an aspiring writer from India who was using his user page here to do exactly the same thing? IF I'm wrong, some other Admins would have told me about that long time ago, so this IP's accusation that I'm vandalising a user page is ridiculous! --<small>] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup></small> 02:32, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::*]. - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 02:33, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| {{outdent}}Note for people directed here by Dave1185: There is a related discussion at ], and the user page in question has been nominated for deletion: ]. -- ] (]) 18:27, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Accidental rollback == | |||
| Sorry, I didn't mean to hit rollback on your talk page, tried to click something else the exact moment the watchlist notices loaded. - ]] 02:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ==DYK nomination of The Mountain Road== | |||
| ] Hello! Your submission of ] at the ] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath ''']''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> ] <sup>(])</sup> 09:24, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, I've just re-written the hook for this nomination as the original wasn't accurate, and my edit conflicted with your approval! Could you please re-verify the hook? Thanks a lot. ] (]) 23:53, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Consider it done! - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 23:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks a lot. I really appreciate it. ] (]) 23:56, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| A former Major League Baseball player is editing his own article using up to 3 accounts and has put into his article something I can't verify. The thread is here for a more complete rundown.] 11:14, 17 June 2012 (UTC) Were my edits correct even though in a 2011 news article it says he was exonerated.] 11:14, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:03, 19 January 2025
 |
|
 | This editor is a Grand High Togneme Vicarus and is entitled to write the Book of All Knowledge: 2nd Edition. |
 Archives |
|
as Aerobird - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
A goat for you!
.jpg)
Thank you for taking care of IntrepidContributor. I ended up needing to help my neighbor for much of the afternoon and didn't get to look at ANI. And thank you to Objective3000 and other folks for being patient. I'm a firm believer in WP:ROPE and if you can give a user that last chance then no one can complain.
EvergreenFir (talk) 06:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- I try to keep things good instead of baaaa-aaaad. Thanks! - The Bushranger One ping only 06:49, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
About Janessian
@The Bushranger, its Nelson. I would want to thank you for the matter. I am glad that you and the others helped out in this case; the matter had been affecting me personally. Still, I have a concern that he might retaliate again despite the block and might go further on.
I had not responded to him directly because I do not wish to make enemies or increase the conflict, and even gave him chances. I am shocked and saddened that he would be going after me for the photo issue when it could be easily resolved in another, perhaps an even better way and somehow, I was singled out. It was my interest in crime that made me come here years ago and he said a lot of things, whether indirect or direct, and yeah it affected me for the week throughout. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 04:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Alas, some people just are that way. If they evade the block, the socks will be instablocked from here out. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:16, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @The Bushranger. Maybe you are right. One thing about the murder victim photos, is that at one point, he believed I used female murder victims for some purpose, but it is not true. It can't be helped but one coincidence is that a majority of the murder victims I covered happen to be female, plus I also got photos of male murder victims and yet he at first did not go after me for them before he went on to say all the murder victim photos should be taken down, and involved everyone else who wrote crime like me. Honestly, I do not mind taking down the photos on the Killing of Wong Chik Yeok, where his first of edits began (and they formed his reason behind the arguments), but I cannot find a legitimate or explainable reason about taking down the other images (and I took into account the disagreements of the other guys who commented on the issue).
- He also said that articles must not follow the newspaper facts and said they are not true and the truth must be verified by the police or to go interview the victims' families. But many wiki crime editors used newspapers as reference and there would have been Sanctions on the papers if the facts reported were not true, so the argument frankly did not hold. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 04:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @The Bushranger Should Janessian's sock also have TPA revoked? Insanityclown1 (talk) 04:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Good call, thanks. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)