Revision as of 13:01, 24 June 2012 editHarlan wilkerson (talk | contribs)5,190 edits →reliable source for settlement restrictions to "Israelis" vs. "Jews"← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 22:11, 22 January 2025 edit undoHemiauchenia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users60,387 edits →I believe that the revised version of this article fails to maintain absolute impartiality and neutrality based on both sides.: Isn't a clear edit request, so fails WP:ECR |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{pp-move-indef}} |
|
{{Pp-move-indef}} |
|
{{skip to talk}} |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
|
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes|search=no}} |
|
{{notice|{{find}} |
|
|
<br> |
|
|
<b>]</b> |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Calm talk}} |
|
|
<!-- Do not remove the sanction template --> |
|
<!-- Do not remove the sanction template --> |
|
{{Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement}} |
|
{{Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement}} |
|
|
{{Controversial}} |
|
{{sanctions| Discretionary sanctions: ]}} |
|
|
|
{{Round in circles|search=no}} |
|
{{not a forum}} |
|
|
|
{{Be calm}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
|
{{Banner holder |collapsed=yes |text=Article history and WikiProjects |1= |
|
{{WikiProject Law|class=C |importance=mid}} |
|
|
|
{{Old XfD multi |
|
{{WikiProject Israel|class=C |importance=low}} |
|
|
|
|date=3 June 2006<!-- oldid 56729010 --> |
|
{{WikiProject Palestine|class=C |importance=mid}} |
|
|
|
|page=Israeli apartheid (phrase) |
|
{{WikiProject Discrimination|importance=high|class=C}} |
|
|
|
|result='''No consensus''' |
|
}} |
|
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|
|action1=AFD |
|
|
|action1date=3 June 2006 |
|
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Israeli apartheid (phrase) |
|
|
|action1result=no consensus |
|
|
|action1oldid=56729010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|date2=15 July 2006<!-- oldid 64035264 --> |
|
|action2=PR |
|
|
|
|page2=Allegations of Israeli apartheid (2nd nomination) |
|
|action2date=17 June 2006 |
|
|
|
|result2='''Speedy keep''' |
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Israeli apartheid/archive1 |
|
|
|action2oldid=58811773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|date3=11 August 2006<!-- oldid 69110851 --> |
|
|action3=AFD |
|
|
|
|page3=Allegations of Israeli apartheid |
|
|action3date=15 July 2006 |
|
|
|
|result3='''No consensus''' |
|
|action3link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid (second nomination) |
|
|
|action3result=speedy keep |
|
|
|action3oldid=64035264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|date4=4 April 2007<!-- oldid 120120303 --> |
|
|action4=AFD |
|
|
|
|page4=Allegations of Israeli apartheid (4th nomination) |
|
|action4date=11 August 2006 |
|
|
|
|result4='''Keep''' |
|
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid |
|
|
|action4result=no consensus |
|
|
|action4oldid=69110851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|date5=24 April 2007<!-- oldid 125667783 --> |
|
|action5=AFD |
|
|
|
|page5=Allegations of Israeli apartheid (5th nomination) |
|
|action5date=4 April 2007 |
|
|
|
|result5='''No consensus''' |
|
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid (4th nomination) |
|
|
|action5result=keep |
|
|
|action5oldid=120120303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|date6=26 June 2007<!-- oldid 140841349 --> |
|
|action6=AFD |
|
|
|
|page6=Allegations of Israeli apartheid (6th nomination) |
|
|action6date=24 April 2007 |
|
|
|
|result6='''Speedy keep''' |
|
|action6link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid (5th nomination) |
|
|
|action6result=no consensus |
|
|
|action6oldid=125667783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|date7=4 September 2007<!-- oldid 155568006 --> |
|
|action7=AFD |
|
|
|
|page7=Allegations of Israeli apartheid (7th nomination) |
|
|action7date=26 June 2007 |
|
|
|
|result7='''No consensus''' |
|
|action7link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid (6th nomination) |
|
|
|action7result=speedy keep |
|
|
|action7oldid=140841349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|date8=11 June 2008<!-- oldid 218733282 --> |
|
|action8=AFD |
|
|
|
|page8=Allegations of Israeli apartheid (8th nomination) |
|
|action8date=4 September 2007 |
|
|
|
|result8='''No consensus''' |
|
|action8link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid (7th nomination) |
|
|
|action8result=no consensus |
|
|
|action8oldid=155568006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|date9=21 August 2010<!-- oldid 380158466 --> |
|
|action9=AFD |
|
|
|
|page9=Israel and the apartheid analogy (9th nomination) |
|
|action9date=11 June 2008 |
|
|
|
|result9='''Keep''' per ] |
|
|action9link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid (8th nomination) |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|action9result=no consensus |
|
|
|
{{Old moves |
|
|action9oldid=218733282 |
|
|
|
|title1=Allegations of Apartheid in Israel |
|
|
|
|
|
|title2=Allegations of Israeli apartheid |
|
|action10=AFD |
|
|
|
|title3=Apartheid in Israel |
|
|action10date=21 August 2010 |
|
|
|action10link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Israel and the apartheid analogy (9th nomination) |
|
|title4=Israel and apartheid |
|
|
|title5=Israel and the apartheid analogy |
|
|action10result=keep |
|
|
|
|title6=Israel and the apartheid analogy allegations |
|
|action10oldid=380158466 |
|
|
|
|title7=Israeli apartheid |
|
|
|title8=Israeli apartheid (epithet) |
|
|
|title9=Israeli apartheid (phrase) |
|
|
|title10=Israeli apartheid (term) |
|
|
|title11=Israeli apartheid allegations |
|
|
|title12=Israeli apartheid analogy |
|
|
|title13=Israel and apartheid |
|
|
|list= |
|
|
* Israel and apartheid → Israeli apartheid, '''Moved''', 20 July 2024, see ]. |
|
|
* Israel and the apartheid analogy → Israel and apartheid, '''Moved''', 24 July 2022, see ]. |
|
|
* Israel and the apartheid analogy → Israeli apartheid allegation, '''No consensus''', 4 December 2021, see ]. |
|
|
* Israel and the apartheid analogy → Israel and apartheid, '''Withdrawn''' per ], 3 May 2021, see ]. |
|
|
* Israel and the apartheid analogy → Claims of Israeli apartheid, '''No consensus''', 8 June 2017, see ]. |
|
|
* Israel and the apartheid analogy → Israeli apartheid analogy, '''No consensus''' due to procedural issue, 29 May 2017, see ]. |
|
|
|oldlist= |
|
|
* Israel and the apartheid analogy → ''?'', '''Not moved''', 12 January 2017, see ]. |
|
|
* Israel and the apartheid analogy → Israeli apartheid, '''Not moved''', 13 January 2011, see ]. |
|
|
* Israel and the apartheid analogy → Israel and apartheid '']<nowiki>]</nowiki>'', '''No consensus''', 20 August 2010, see ]. |
|
|
* Israel and the apartheid analogy → Allegations of Israeli apartheid, '''No consensus''', 3 May 2009, see ]. |
|
|
* Allegations of Israeli apartheid → Apartheid controversy in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, '''No consensus''', 28 August 2007, see ]. |
|
|
* Allegations of Israeli apartheid → Apartheid controversy in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, '''No consensus''', 17 August 2007, see ]. |
|
|
* Allegations of Israeli apartheid → Israeli apartheid, '''No consensus''', 16 March 2007, see ]. |
|
|
* Allegations of Israeli apartheid → Israeli apartheid, '''Not moved''', 14 December 2006, see ]. |
|
|
* Allegations of Israeli apartheid → Israeli apartheid, '''Not moved''', 6 October 2006, see ]. |
|
|
* Israeli apartheid → Allegations of Israeli apartheid, '''Move''', 26 June 2006, see ]. |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Old peer review |reviewedname=Israeli apartheid |archive=1 |ID=58811773 |date=17 June 2006}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Discrimination |importance=high}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Israel |importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Law |importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Palestine |importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Human rights |importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups|importance=high}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject History|importance=high}} |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{press |
|
{{press |
|
| author=Haviv Rettig Gur |
|
| author=Haviv Rettig Gur |
|
| title=Israeli-Palestinian conflict rages on Misplaced Pages |
|
| title=Israeli-Palestinian conflict rages on Misplaced Pages |
|
| org=The Jerusalem Post |
|
| org=The Jerusalem Post |
|
| url=http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=175660 |
|
| url=http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=175660 |
|
| date=16/05/2010 |
|
| date=16 May 2010 |
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
| author2=Omer Benjakob |
|
{{archive box |auto=no |index=/Archive index |search=yes |root=Talk:Israeli apartheid/{{!}}Talk:Allegations of Israeli apartheid/{{!}}Talk:Israel and the apartheid analogy |bot=MiszaBot I |age=3 |units=months | |
|
|
|
| title2=On Misplaced Pages, Israel Is Losing the Battle Against the Word 'Apartheid' |
|
<center> |
|
|
|
| org2=Haaretz |
|
], |
|
|
|
| url2=https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-on-wikipedia-israel-is-losing-the-battle-against-the-word-apartheid-1.9330590 |
|
], |
|
|
|
| date2=26 November 2020 |
|
], |
|
|
|
|
|
], |
|
|
|
|author3 = Hava Mendelle |
|
], |
|
|
|
|title3 = The World Jewish Congress investigates Misplaced Pages |
|
], |
|
|
|
|date3 = March 23, 2024 |
|
], |
|
|
|
|org3 = ] |
|
], |
|
|
|
|url3 = https://www.spectator.com.au/2024/03/the-world-jewish-congress-investigates-wikipedia/ |
|
], |
|
|
|
|lang3 = |
|
], |
|
|
|
|quote3 = |
|
], </br> |
|
|
|
|archiveurl3 = |
|
], |
|
|
|
|archivedate3 = <!-- do not wikilink --> |
|
], |
|
|
|
|accessdate3 = March 23, 2024 |
|
], |
|
|
|
|
|
], |
|
|
|
|author4 = Yaakov Menken |
|
], |
|
|
|
|title4 = Misplaced Pages hates Israel and Jews |
|
], |
|
|
|
|date4 = August 6, 2024 |
|
], |
|
|
|
|org4 = ] |
|
],</br> |
|
|
|
|url4 = https://www.jns.org/wikipedia-hates-israel-and-jews/ |
|
], |
|
|
|
|lang4 = |
|
], |
|
|
|
|quote4 = |
|
], |
|
|
|
|archiveurl4 = |
|
], |
|
|
|
|archivedate4 = <!-- do not wikilink --> |
|
], |
|
|
|
|accessdate4 = August 6, 2024 |
|
], |
|
|
|
|
|
], |
|
|
|
|author5 = Aaron Bandler |
|
],</br> |
|
|
|
|title5 = Misplaced Pages Editors Title Article “Israeli Apartheid” |
|
], |
|
|
|
|date5 = September 26, 2024 |
|
], |
|
|
|
|org5 = ] |
|
], |
|
|
|
|url5 = https://jewishjournal.com/commentary/opinion/375347/wikipedia-editors-title-article-israeli-apartheid/ |
|
], |
|
|
|
|lang5 = |
|
], |
|
|
|
|quote5 = |
|
], |
|
|
|
|archiveurl5 = |
|
], |
|
|
|
|archivedate5 = <!-- do not wikilink --> |
|
],</br> |
|
|
|
|accessdate5 = October 7, 2024 |
|
], |
|
|
|
|
|
], |
|
|
|
|author6 = |
|
] |
|
|
|
|title6 = Misplaced Pages Decrees: Israel is an Apartheid State |
|
</center> |
|
|
|
|date6 = September 19, 2024 |
|
|
|org6 = The Misplaced Pages Flood |
|
|
|url6 = https://thewikipediaflood.blogspot.com/2024/09/wikipedia-decrees-israel-is-apartheid.html |
|
|
|lang6 = |
|
|
|quote6 = |
|
|
|archiveurl6 = |
|
|
|archivedate6 = <!-- do not wikilink --> |
|
|
|accessdate6 = October 7, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|author7 = Shraga Simmons |
|
|
|title7 = Weaponizing Misplaced Pages against Israel: How the global information pipeline is being hijacked by digital jihadists. |
|
|
|date7 = November 11, 2024 |
|
|
|org7 = aish |
|
|
|url7 = https://aish.com/weaponizing-wikipedia-against-israel/ |
|
|
|lang7 = |
|
|
|quote7 = |
|
|
|archiveurl7 = https://web.archive.org/web/20241113082217/https://aish.com/weaponizing-wikipedia-against-israel/ |
|
|
|archivedate7 = November 13, 2024 |
|
|
|accessdate7 = December 1, 2024 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{Mbox |image=] |text=For a list of references that may be useful when improving this article in the future, please see ''']'''.}} |
|
|
{{Archives|banner=yes}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|
|counter = 39 |
|
|counter = 44 |
|
|
|algo = old(60d) |
|
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
|
|
|archive = Talk:Israeli apartheid/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 2 |
|
|
|
}}{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|algo = old(90d) |
|
|
|archive = Talk:Israel and the apartheid analogy/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|
|target=/Archive index |
|
|target=/Archive index |
|
|mask=Israeli apartheid/Archive <#> |
|
|
|mask=Allegations of Israeli apartheid/Archive <#> |
|
|
|mask=Israel and the apartheid analogy/Archive <#> |
|
|mask=Israel and the apartheid analogy/Archive <#> |
|
|leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |template= |
|
|leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |template= |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
|
|
|
The main discussion area for this series of articles was at: ] |
|
|
|
|
|
== reliable source for settlement restrictions to "Israelis" vs. "Jews" == |
|
|
|
|
|
Dailycare reverted a change made by an IP editor of the phrase "Jewish-only" settlements to "Israeli-only" settlements. Dailycare's justification here was a quotation from testimony at the UN Committee to End Racial Discrimination at which a committee member, Mahmoud Aboul-Nasr responded to testimony of an Israeli official with a series of (more or less rhetorical) questions, including: |
|
|
:The Israeli delegation had referred to Chief Justice Barak. Was he the same judge who had ruled that the torture of Palestinians was legal? Could the Committee have a copy of the decision by that court, issued on 15 November 1996, allowing Palestinians to be shaken so roughly that death could ensue? It was likewise difficult to see what was democratic about the daily bulldozing of Palestinian homes or the construction of a dozen new settlements in the Jerusalem area for Jews only. |
|
|
I don't see how this can be considered a reliable source for the claim that settlements are for "Jews only". This is something of an off-the-cuff remark from, what the Jerusalem Post describes as a former Egyptian and Arab League diplomat with a history of controversial statements about Israel. See: . Can we get a better source for this claim? ] (]) 20:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I agree. The ] is supposed to summarize the article, and the article repeatedly refers to Israeli settlements, using the expression Jewish settlements only once. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 21:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Can I offer a non-neutral source? |
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/History/Modern+History/Centenary+of+Zionism/Jewish+Settlement+in+the+Land+of+Israel.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly biased, right? ] (]) 22:22, 21 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:And clearly off-topic. What does that have to do with the subject of Israeli settlements in the West Bank? — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 22:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Criticism of "Jewish only settlements" has been published in mainstream sources, but only in a way that could be attributed to the author or to critics, not as fact from the sources I have seen. , , , , , . Perhaps a compromise here would be to use "Jewish settlements" which would be easy enough to attribute to RS . ] (]) 22:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoting off my source above: |
|
|
|
|
|
"After the 1967 Six-Day War, the areas of Judea, Samaria and Gaza, as well as the Sinai peninsula, came under Israeli control. In the 1970s, a group called Gush Emunim dedicated itself to the establishment of Jewish settlements in Judea and Samaria, the heartland of the biblical Land of Israel and the places where events recounted in the Bible took place. After a protracted struggle, the government finally permitted settlement in these areas, until then populated solely by Arabs, and by the mid-1990s some 150,000 Jews lived in Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip." |
|
|
|
|
|
So the term used is "Jewish settlements" and the source is the UN recognized government of Israel. ] (]) 02:44, 22 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I don't even understand what "Israeli-only settlements" would be and why they'd cause controversy here... ] <sup>]</sup> 03:21, 22 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::This appears to be a case of wikilawyering. The CERD Committee itself has explicitly addressed the subject of Jewish-only settlements in the occupied territory as a violation of its published guidelines and an concern under article 3 of the Convention:<blockquote> The prevailing human rights doctrine was that a State was responsible for actions in a territory under its control. In the case now under consideration, it had been argued that the situation was under the control of the Palestinian Authority but, regardless of the validity or otherwise of that argument, <b>it failed to address the issue of the Jewish settlements in the occupied territories. The status of the settlements was clearly inconsistent with article 3 of the Convention which, as noted in the Committee's General Recommendation XIX, prohibited all forms of racial segregation in all countries.</b> There was a consensus among publicists that the prohibition of racial discrimination, irrespective of territories, was an imperative norm of international law. -- CERD/C/SR.1250, 9 March 1998 |
|
|
... |
|
|
The Committee draws the State party’s attention to its General Recommendation 19 (1995) concerning the prevention, prohibition and eradication of all policies and practices of racial segregation and apartheid, and urges the State party to take immediate measures to prohibit and eradicate any such policies or practices which severely and disproportionately affect the Palestinian population in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and which violate the provisions of article 3 of the Convention.-- page 6 CERD/C/ISR/CO/14-16, 9 March 2012.</blockquote> |
|
|
The material in the article about Jewish-only settlements should be restored. ] (]) 13:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== UN Section == |
|
|
|
|
|
I have removed the following paragraph from the UN section: |
|
|
|
|
|
:Article 3 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination says "States Parties particularly condemn racial segregation and apartheid and undertake to prevent, prohibit and eradicate all practices of this nature in territories under their jurisdiction." A review of Israel's country report by the experts of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination took issue with the establishment of Jewish-only settlements and stated "The status of the settlements was clearly inconsistent with Article 3 of the Convention which, as noted in the Committee's General Recommendation XIX, prohibited all forms of racial segregation in all countries. There was a consensus among publicists that the prohibition of racial discrimination, irrespective of territories, was an imperative norm of international law. In 2007 the CERD addressed a number of concerns regarding situations involving separation and segregation in Israel and the Occupied Territories and applied article 3 to violations of human rights generated by the construction of the Wall and its associated regime. |
|
|
|
|
|
The first problem here is the sentence that starts out "A review of Israel's country report by the experts of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination..." and then continues on to a quote. The quote here appears to be attributed to the Committee's, "experts", however, it is actually from ], who is one member of the committee (or at least was, in 1998, when this meeting took place). One individual may believe that Israel is violating Article 3, but that doesn't mean that the committee has reached this formal conclusion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Recent lede edit == |
|
Further, when we examine source 65 there is no mention of the word apartheid. This article's text says that CERD "applied article 3 to violations of human rights..." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The whole paragraph should be trimmed: "The International Court of Justice in its 2024 advisory opinion found that Israel's occupation {{strikethrough|of the Palestinian territories constitutes systemic discrimination and}} is in breach of Article 3 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which prohibits racial segregation and apartheid. {{strikethrough|The opinion itself was silent as to whether the discrimination amounted to apartheid while individual judges were split on the issue}}" ] (]) 19:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
Is any of this really relevant to this article? Article 3 includes language regarding "racial segregation and apartheid" but it doesn't define "apartheid". Let's look at what the committee actually says in reference 65. Here's the strongest language I could find that references Article 3: |
|
|
:"The Committee is of the opinion that the wall and its associated regime raise serious concerns under the Convention, since they gravely infringe a number of human rights of Palestinians residing in the territory occupied by Israel." |
|
|
Generally, the committee's language states that it has concerns about a particular Israeli policy given certain articles of the convention. That's not saying that the committee thinks Israel is violating those articles. But even if it were to say that Israel ''violated'' Article 3, which as far as I can tell it doesn't, to say that a violation of article 3 equals apartheid is original research. The implication of this paragraph is that this UN committee supports the apartheid analogy with reference to Israel. I see nothing in the given sources that indicates this.] (]) 00:33, 22 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:I think the former trim would be fine; with the latter it seems important to somehow clarify how the opinion relates to the topic of apartheid. We could trim {{tq|while individual judges were split on the issue}} though which is a non-essential detail. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>\<sup>]</sup> 15:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
The Concluding Observations of the entire CERD Panel for the 2013 report cited Article 3, the General Recommendation, and Apartheid. It said<blockquote> The Committee draws the State party’s attention to its General Recommendation 19 (1995) concerning the prevention, prohibition and eradication of all policies and practices of racial segregation and apartheid, and urges the State party to take immediate measures to prohibit and eradicate any such policies or practices which severely and disproportionately affect the Palestinian population in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and which violate the provisions of article 3 of the Convention.-- page 6 CERD/C/ISR/CO/14-16, 9 March 2012. </blockquote> |
|
|
|
::Fyi {{ping|AlsoWukai}} since you just copy edited the latter sentence. Waiting for other opinions as well. ] (]) 14:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Fwiw, I think the "systemic discrimination" element is due, because it is that finding that led to the Article 3 finding. ] (]) 14:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Racism and Zionism in lede == |
|
I think the article should cite these observations. ] (]) 11:56, 13 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi @], |
|
== 20% == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to make your recent edit work in the lede, but I ultimately removed it as out of place and ]. Since the lede is a summary of the overall topic, it doesn't need to go into that level of detail about a matter which is tangential to the topic of apartheid. I think you'll need to get consensus here first before reinstating. ] (]) 10:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
It doesn't state anywhere in the main article (apart from in quotation) that 20% of Israeli Citizens are Arab and enjoy full citizenship rights. You should probably consider including that to make sure the article is true and balanced. Don't want to be misleading people now do we? ] (]) 10:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:I agree with your removal and would have removed it myself, it is irrelevant to the article in general not just the lede which is about the israeli apartheid, not whether zionism is racist or not. ] (]) 14:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
And it doesn't state that it would be more than 20% if Israel wouldn't keep the rest segregated and without citizenship to maintain a regime demographically dominated by Jews, which falls under the definition of the crime of Apartheid. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:00, 17 May 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
::It makes more sense in context, but it's still tangential. If you go to "American views", it's there currently: |
|
|
::{{blockquote|In 1975, former ] ] voiced the United States' strong disagreement with the ] that "Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination", saying that unlike apartheid, Zionism is not a racist ideology. He said that racist ideologies such as apartheid favor discrimination on the grounds of alleged biological differences, yet few people are as biologically heterogeneous as the Jews. Moynihan called the UN resolution "a great evil", adding, "the abomination of anti-Semitism has been given the appearance of international sanction by the UN". ], executive director of the ], said the resolution smeared the 'racist' label on Zionism, adding that Black people could “easily smell out the fact that ‘anti-Zionism’ in this context is a code word for anti-Semitism”. The General Assembly's resolution equating Zionism with racism was revoked in 1991.}} |
|
|
::Neither Moynihan nor his argument is important enough to go into the lede and it takes up far too much time to explain its relevance to the topic anyway. Hence, ]. And, TBH, the statement is still probably overly long where it is, even now. ] (]) 17:24, 10 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Israeli civil law == |
|
== This article represent a subjective and dangerous opinion, not facts! == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{ping|Makeandtoss}} In the sentence that conveys who in the West Bank is subject to Israeli civil law, I changed "Jewish settlers" to "Israeli settlers" because it is precisely the Israelis there who are subject to Israeli civil law. The previous wording, by ], misled the reader into wrongly thinking that the legal determination of which law to apply is governed by religion, rather than citizenship. |
|
More over, the existance of such article in Misplaced Pages damages the site's reputation as an objective reliable source of information. |
|
|
It is almost similar to an article that will present the USA as a racist state, which is not true, not objective and not apropriate. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(which you claim to be a "middle ground") return the article to that ]. The article you mention in your edit message ("A Threshold Crossed") does indeed use the phrase "Jewish Israelis", but does not claim that some other laws apply to non-Jewish Israelis in the West Bank. If you wish to convey that non-Jewish Israeli residents of the West Bank are not subject to Israeli civil law, please first find a reliable source that supports such a claim. Or do you have some other motivation? ] (]) 14:04, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:It doesn't actually do any of those things. To report the criticisms that others have made is not the same as an endorsement of said criticisms. ] (]) 17:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:WP reflects RS, as I clearly linked HRW in my edit summary. Jewish Israelis and Palestinians are the primary groups involved in this analysis about apartheid: HRW: "Two primary groups live today in Israel and the OPT: Jewish Israelis and Palestinians. One primary sovereign, the Israeli government, rules over them." Further details are footnotes to this primary framing by RS. ] (]) 08:57, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:You might find the following guide useful, ]. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 17:13, 7 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest adding a note to the effect that the vast majority of Israeli settlers are of Jewish nationality as it says in first sentence of the lead at ]. "They are populated by Israeli citizens, almost exclusively of ],<ref name=Haklai2015>{{cite book | last1=Haklai | first1=O. | last2=Loizides | first2=N. | title=Settlers in Contested Lands: Territorial Disputes and Ethnic Conflicts | publisher=Stanford University Press | year=2015 | isbn=978-0-8047-9650-7 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xeyACgAAQBAJ&pg=PA19 | access-date=2018-12-14 | page=19 | quote=the Israel settlers reside almost solely in exclusively Jewish communities (one exception is a small enclave within the city of Hebron).}}</ref><ref name=Dumper2014>{{cite book | last=Dumper | first=M. | title=Jerusalem Unbound: Geography, History, and the Future of the Holy City | publisher=Columbia University Press | year=2014 | isbn=978-0-231-53735-3 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=E8nbAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA85 | access-date=2018-12-14 | page=85 | quote=This is despite huge efforts by successive governments to fragment and encircle Palestinian residential areas with exclusively Jewish zones of residence – the settlements.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-israel-palestinians-settlements-idUSKBN0JL0D620141207|title=Leave or let live? Arabs move in to Jewish settlements|newspaper=Reuters|date=7 December 2014|via=www.reuters.com|access-date=21 February 2023|archive-date=30 July 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150730104133/http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/12/07/us-israel-palestinians-settlements-idUSKBN0JL0D620141207|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|
== Toronto == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
: The situation is more complex than this implies. First, it isn't just a matter of where someone lives but also where they are when they commit an "offence". Second, the rules are somewhat flexible, and in some cases should be called policies rather than rules; this allows the fate of individuals to be decided on a case by case basis. This makes it difficult to find a definitive description. Generally speaking, a Palestinian who is an Israeli citizen will be tried in a civil court, but this needs a search for sources and there are probably exceptions. However, Jews who are not Israeli citizens are always, or almost always, tried in civil courts. Since 1984 this has been explicit policy; the order includes "persons entitled to citizenship under the Law of Return" (i.e. Jews) in the same category as citizens. Many military orders have the same clause. Sorry no citations for now, too busy. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 01:49, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
Only the second part of this has anything to do with Israel and rhe apartheid analogy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::Another complicating factor is which courts handle West Bank cases involving tourists. But, for the sentence being edited, the question at hand is (IMO) whether all cases involving Israeli defendants are handled by Israeli civil law, or whether some are handled differently. ] (]) 05:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::The HRW report (ie dealing with the apartheid issue) "Israeli authorities also maintain parallel criminal justice systems for settlers and Palestinians in the West Bank, excluding East Jerusalem. Israeli authorities try Palestinians charged with crimes in military courts, where they face a conviction rate of nearly 100 percent. By contrast, authorities have passed regulations that extend Israeli criminal law on a personal basis to settlers, and grant Israeli courts jurisdiction over them, while authorities have followed a longstanding policy not to prosecute Jewish settlers in military courts. The Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) found in a 2014 report that “since the 1980s, all Israeli citizens brought to trial before the military courts were Arab citizens and residents of Israel." |
|
|
:::This imo is the main point for the lead, two systems, one territory, technicalities and sundry irrelevant details can be dealt with in the article body. ] (]) 11:43, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Good find. Links to the 2014 ACRI report can be found at the bottom of . The HRW report cites p. 37 of the ACRI report, but it's worth reading all of section B (pp. 36-39), including footnotes. ] (]) 12:58, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::That is good support for "Jewish Israelis" rather than just "Israelis". We can always add clarity via a quote in the reference. ] (]) 09:38, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{reftalk}} |
|
In March 2011, Toronto Mayor Rob Ford has said that he will not allow city funding for the 2011 Toronto Pride Parade if organizers allow the controversial group Queers Against Israeli Apartheid (QuAIA) march again this year. “Taxpayers dollars should not go toward funding hate speech,” Ford said. However, in April 2011, the city manager reported to the city's executive committee that the use of the phrase ‘Israeli apartheid’ does not violate the City’s Anti-discrimination policy, nor does it constitute discrimination under the Canadian Criminal Code or the Ontario Human Rights Code |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Request for Sources and Balanced Representation == |
|
|
{{hat|]. ] (]) 00:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|
|
I noticed that the article has recently shifted its language to refer to Israel as an "apartheid state" and the stance now being solidified due to the ongoing war. Its language refers to Israel as an "apartheid state" in a way that seems more definitive. Given that this term is highly contested and there are valid arguments on both sides, I believe it's important to ensure that we present the full spectrum of perspectives. Could we include more references to sources that provide an opposing viewpoint, particularly those that challenge the use of the term "apartheid" in relation to Israel? This would help maintain neutrality and offer readers a broader understanding of the issue. ] (]) 00:09, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:No. See ]. ] (]) 00:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
The first part is a dispute about funding for a group. It needs to be made clear if there is any criticism of the analogy with apartheid. This is not there at the moment. It is not made clear as to what is meant by hate speech, or whether this claim has anything to do with the apartheid analogy.] (]) 19:07, 13 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{Hab}} |
The whole paragraph should be trimmed: "The International Court of Justice in its 2024 advisory opinion found that Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories constitutes systemic discrimination and is in breach of Article 3 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which prohibits racial segregation and apartheid. The opinion itself was silent as to whether the discrimination amounted to apartheid while individual judges were split on the issue" Makeandtoss (talk) 19:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
I tried to make your recent edit work in the lede, but I ultimately removed it as out of place and WP:UNDUE. Since the lede is a summary of the overall topic, it doesn't need to go into that level of detail about a matter which is tangential to the topic of apartheid. I think you'll need to get consensus here first before reinstating. Lewisguile (talk) 10:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
I suggest adding a note to the effect that the vast majority of Israeli settlers are of Jewish nationality as it says in first sentence of the lead at Israeli settlement. "They are populated by Israeli citizens, almost exclusively of Jewish identity or ethnicity,