| Revision as of 13:22, 19 July 2012 editMichaeldsuarez (talk | contribs)7,715 edits →Not here to build an encyclopedia: Comment.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:20, 21 July 2012 edit undoRoger Davies (talk | contribs)Administrators34,589 edits Blank page, {{ArbComBlock}} | ||
| (99 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{ArbComBlock}} | |||
| This is to confirm that this is an ArbCom block, based in part on Checkuser data. User is in all likelihood trolling. ] <sup>]</sup> 08:20, 21 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Welcome!== | |||
| ]]] ], NewtonGeek! Thank you for ]. I am ] and I have been editing Misplaced Pages for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on ]. You can also check out ] or type {{tlx|helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| Also, when you post on ] you should ] using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! ]] 22:39, 27 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Talkback== | |||
| {{talkback|Theopolisme|ts=14:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
| '''] '''</font><sub><small>]</sup></sup></small> 14:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Replied again. '''] '''</font><sub><small>]</sup></sup></small> 14:52, 28 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::BOO! I'm gonna stop notifying you on your talk when I reply, as I assume you have my talk watchlisted. Or not. Let me know. '''] '''</font><sub><small>]</sup></sup></small> 15:08, 28 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::More info on watchlists posted in that thread. ] (]) 18:08, 29 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback|WP:Teahouse/Questions||ts=] (]) 17:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
| == Wikipediocracy == | |||
| I'm sorry about how some Wikipediocracy members are treating you. Not all Wikipediocracy members behave like that. --] (]) 01:57, 1 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=10878#p10878 – The speculation and the distrust. --] (]) 13:15, 1 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| Thanks for the nice words on my page, I appreciate it. ] (]) 23:47, 13 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hatted sections== | |||
| When a section in an ArbCom case has been hatted, the intention is to stop any further edits in order to reduce the possibility of increased friction. As such, was unhelpful, regardless of what you felt was the provocation. If you feel someone has made an inappropriate edit then please ask a Clerk to look into the matter. ''']''' ''']''' 12:56, 17 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I'd like to clarify that you didn't realize I did bring the hatted discussion edit to the attention of the clerks yesterday morning. I reverted the edit after consulting an administrator, Dennis Brown, and following his advice. In that conversation I indicated that I've never reverted before and wasn't sure that I was allowed to. He gave me instructions on how to do a revert. ] (]) 13:50, 17 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Not here to build an encyclopedia== | |||
| NewtonGeek, having reviewed all of your contributions, I note that you have a grand total of 166 edits, of which exactly four are to article space. It appears that you have a mistaken understanding of what Misplaced Pages is about, and are treating this site as some sort of opinion forum or social website. This is not what Misplaced Pages is for. It is time for you to move on. I am blocking you indefinitely. Unless you can persuade other administrators that you will restrict yourself to building encyclopedic content in the article space, I do not see a reason for you to continue to participate here. ] (]) 13:17, 19 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I feel that NewtonGeek has the right to be a commentator. I don't believe that NewtonGeek should be blocked just because he or she is a commentator. --] (]) 13:22, 19 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:20, 21 July 2012
You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-en
wikimedia.org).
Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.
This is to confirm that this is an ArbCom block, based in part on Checkuser data. User is in all likelihood trolling. Roger Davies 08:20, 21 July 2012 (UTC)