Misplaced Pages

:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:03, 2 May 2013 view sourceLieutenant of Melkor (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers20,031 edits Requesting full protection of New York, New York. (TW)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:05, 22 January 2025 view source Cyberbot I (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors1,723,667 edits Clerking main page and moving requests to appropriate subpages.Tag: Manual revert 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{noadminbacklog}}<!-- Do not hide or modify this, a bot named "Cyberbot I" will manage it automatically.--><noinclude><!-- Please put protection templates *inside* the noinclude, because this page is transcluded. -->{{Short description|Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages}}{{/Header}}{{Floating link|class=sysop-show|Administrator instructions|Administrator instructions}}{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}}{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed|{{pp|1=vandalism|action=edit|small=yes|expiry=}}}}<!-- Put interwikis at the Wikidata entry and categories in /Header instead of this page -->
<noinclude>{{pp-move-indef}}{{/Header}}{{Floatinglink|Administrator instructions|Administrator instructions}}
__FORCETOC__</noinclude><!-- Do not hide or modify this, a bot named "Cyberbot I" will manage it automatically-->
<!-- Put interwikis at the WikiData entry and categories in /Header instead of this page -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT THIS PAGE. The formatting is enforced by Cyberbot. To make changes, please contact Cyberpower678. -->
__TOC__</noinclude><!--Do not hide or modify this, a bot will manage it automatically-->
== Current requests for protection ==
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}


<!-- Please copy the following example code to add a new entry at the bottom of the correct subpage:
==== {{la|New York, New York}} ====
=== ] ===
'''Indefinite full protection:''' Content dispute/edit warring – No reason to edit this redirect, as per current consensus to use primary usage as the deciding factor in making this redirect to NYC, not Manhattan. ''GotR'' <sup>]</sup> 23:03, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
==== {{la|Mockingjay}} ==== * {{pagelinks|Example}} ~~~~
-->
'''Temporary pending changes:''' ] policy violations – Persistent libel against what appears to be user's classmates. Edits have been suppressed. ] <sup>(])</sup> 22:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
==== {{la|Toby Turner}} ====
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – There has been a constant amount of vandalism from IPs and new users, which, according to the 50 most recent contributions, feature a wide range of vandalism. '''<span style="text-shadow:#808080 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em">]]]</span>''' 22:36, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
===={{la|Kelly Ayotte}}====
'''temporary semi protection''' - the page has become a battleground between those championing the senator's "gun rights" support and those wishing to place her opposition to background checks as responsible for the next mass shooting. -- ] 21:53, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


== Current ] in protection level ==
==== {{la|Pegasus}} ====
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button protect}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Increase}}
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism. '''] ]''' 21:51, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->


== Current ] in protection level ==
==== {{la|James Monroe}} ====
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button unprotect}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Decrease}}
'''Indefinite pending changes:''' Persistent vandalism – Page receives weekly vandalism from IPs, both obvious vandalism and not so obvious (changing Monroe's term dates). <font face="copperplate gothic light">] (])</font> 21:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->
==== {{la|Hypertext Transfer Protocol}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – Long term deletion of material, test edits and vandalism. At least the last ~25 edits are only vandalism and reverts. <small style="font: 12px Courier New; color: #000000; display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 3px 1px 4px;background-color:#fff">]</small> 20:29, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|pend}} ]] 22:06, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


== Current ] to a protected page ==
==== {{la|BK Chicken Fries}} & {{la|the Burger King}} ====
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button edit}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Edit}}
'''Perm-semi''' or a long term '''Temp-semi''' - An IP hopping edit warrior who has been constantly adding trivia to the article is at it again after the protection ended. Multiple editors besides myself have removed this, but he keeps reposting. I've tried to discuss this on the talk page and explain why this is inappropriate for inclusion, but the IP poster is sockpuppetting via various IP addresses from AT&T wireless and Charter (all assigned in central Massachusetts and Northern Rhode Island) to make it look as multiple editors are chiming in - a clear violation of policy. Obviously, no valid conversation can be had. The contrib has shown that he has no intention of good faith, truly discussing the issue, adhering to our standards of neutrality, or following any other policy of Misplaced Pages. Further he is lobbing personal attacks at me instead of discussing the issue. This is tendentious editing at its worst, and the article really should be locked down. I have also asked for the Burger King article to also be locked because the contrib has actively shown that he will migrate to that article if this one is locked down. --<span style="font-family:lucida sans, sans-serif;">] <small style="font-size:85%;">(] • ])</small></span> 19:50, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->
*'''Automated comment:''' A request for protection/unprotection was recently made for this page, and was denied at some point within the last ]. ]&nbsp;&nbsp;]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;]&nbsp;&raquo;&nbsp; 20:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
::In response to the bot posting, yes this is a repost. I asked the admin to reconsider the denial and the post was archived before a response was made. I have expanded this to explain why the protection is needed and why the discussion is not bearing fruit due to the IP contrib's behavior. --<span style="font-family:lucida sans, sans-serif;">] <small style="font-size:85%;">(] • ])</small></span> 20:25, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


== Handled requests ==
===={{la|Geno Smith}}====
''A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at ].''
'''Semi-protection:''' High level of IP vandalism following his being drafted by the New York Jets and the controversy surrounding the firing of his agents. Perhaps a brief lockout will help quell the edits though I'm not hopeful. ] <sup>]</sup> 19:49, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|Dizzy Wright}} ====
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – High vandalism on a ]. <font color="#BA181F">''']</font> <font color="#BA181F"><small>]</small></font> 19:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
==== {{la|Scott Hall}} ====
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism since November. IP, usually in 95 range, continually changing height and weight to arbitrary numbers. One IP was blocked yesterday, but another 95 is back today. ] ] 19:23, ], ] (UTC)

==== {{la|Bath salts (drug)}} ====
'''Pending changes''' or '''semi-protection''': This article is frequently and persistently the target of vandalism and other unconstructive edits from IPs and new users. ] (]) 19:22, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|United Kingdom local elections, 2014}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – Same vandals who were attacking the 2013 article, which was protected a few minutes ago. — '''''] ]''''' 19:00, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|s|3 days}} -- ] <sup>]</sup> 19:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|Genocides in history}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – IP user making changes to sourced content and adding content sourced to unreliable sources. Using Op-eds such as these for historical statements of fact, And is quite obviously misrepresnting othhers such as this which does not even remotely support the content adde as it has no mention at all of a "A consensus of Russian historians". ] (]) 17:06, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
==== {{la|Call of Duty: Ghosts}} ====
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent IP vandalism. ] (]) 16:54, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|Arcade Fire}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – Same IP vandalism from multiple IP addresses. ] (]) 15:52, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
==== {{la|Gas giant}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism. <small>]</small><sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">]</sub> 15:30, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|pend|6 months}} ]] 22:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

===={{la|List of One Life to Live characters (2010s)}}====
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent IP vandalism of unsourced material. ] 15:16, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|Gun control}} ====
'''Temporary full protection:''' Content dispute/edit warring – Discussions are getting nowhere. Request full page protection so I can open a dispute resolution case. ] (]) 14:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

:DR opened ] ] (]) 15:46, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
::{{RFPP|p}} Change back to semi-protection once dispute resolution concludes. ]] 22:03, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|29th Golden Raspberry Awards}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi-protection due to disruption of ] page by likely sock of {{userlinks|Onelifefreak2007}}. Thank you for your time. &mdash; ''']''' (]) 13:57, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|nea}} Also, the user is already autoconfirmed, so semiprotection would not be effective. What about SPI? ] (]) 17:17, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|Bangladesh Navy}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – Persistent and frequent vandalism and addition of unsourced material by IP-users and non-autoconfirmed user accounts. ] (]) 10:16, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|semi|3 weeks}} ]] 21:46, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
*'''Automated comment:''' Page has not been protected. ]&nbsp;&nbsp;]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;]&nbsp;&raquo;&nbsp; 22:03, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|Swami Nithyananda}} ====
'''Indefinite semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism. ] (]) 09:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|dr}} ] (]) 17:18, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|Māori protest movement}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – IP-based language modifications. ] (]) 07:27, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|pend|1 month}} ]] 21:56, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|Satyajit Ray}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism. ]]] 06:59, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|d}} I see many IP edits, but far from all of them are vandalism. ] (]) 17:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

===={{la|Immortal (band)}}====
'''Full protection:''' Too many edit wars. I'd like to see this page protected until consensus is reached on the talk page (as various editors keep removing sourced content without waiting for the discussion to finish). ] (]) 04:55, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|nea}} Will warn the user on his talk page. ]] 21:51, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|Hashtag}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection''' - steady IP and new account vandalism for several months. ] (]) 02:02, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|nea}} ]] 17:08, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
::Nearly all of the edits to the page for the last two months have been vandalism and reversion of vandalism; that's pretty high over the 5% average mentioned in the semiprotection guideline. ] (]) 17:45, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|Al-Ahbash}} ====
'''Temporary full protection:''' Content dispute/edit warring. ] (]) 01:38, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|aiv}} Also somewhat stale. ] (]) 17:08, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|Avril Lavigne discography}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP edits that are not constructive. (request on behalf of User Watquaza). <small><span style="white-space:nowrap;">'''~ ] ] ~ </span><span style="white-space:nowrap;">] ]:] ] ~'''</span></small> 00:19, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|d}} "Not constructive" is not vandalism; use the articles talkpage to find a solution for this problem. ] (]) 17:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

===={{la|Kosovo–Pakistan relations}}====
{{la|Foreign relations of the Republic of Kosovo}}<br/>
{{lt|Foreign relations of Kosovo‎}}<br/>
{{lt|Foreign relations of Pakistan}}<br/>
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistant sock-puppetry by ]. See ]. ] (]) 21:31, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|b}} ] (]) 17:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
::Sorry, but did you look at the history? The first article, for instance, has been edited by 5 socks of the user in the past month. Yes the current sock has been blocked, but that only delays the problem for a couple of days until he has a fresh one. He's been socking for 5 years, so it's unlikely he's just going to give up... ] (]) 17:38, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:::No, I never look at the article histories before making a decision.....that is what makes being an admin so easy......ok, let's get serious: the frequency of the "unconstructive" edits (which are not necessarily vandalism) is not very high, so that would not be a cause for semiprotection, the prospect of having more socking would not be a case for semiprotection because we do not protect preemptively. I see no other way forward but to keep reporting the socks and reverting.....if another admin wants to protect these, they may feel free, of course. ] (]) 18:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
::::Yes, protection is not used preemptively, but I don't think that's the case here. There's a clear track record of disruption that is almost certain to continue unless the article is protected. And , another sock has just appeared to continue the disruption. Surely there's a more efficient way to deal with persistent sockpuppetry from ips and newly registered accounts then having to repeatedly revert and file SPI reports (which often languish for more than a week before being dealt with)? I was under the impression that {{tl|pp-semi-sock}} was designed for just such cases. ] (]) 20:42, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|Manifest destiny}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Significant amounts of IP vandalism.] (]) 19:58, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|pend|6 months}} ]] 21:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

== Current requests for unprotection ==
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/URheading}}

== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/SRheading}}

==Fulfilled/denied requests==
''A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at ].''

Latest revision as of 04:05, 22 January 2025

Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages "WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Skip to requests for protection
    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit
    this header: view • edit


    Archiving icon
    Archives

    2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Shortcuts

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    2025 assassination of Sharia judges in Iran

    Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 09:03, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

    Please enforce WP:CT/IRP. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
    Is there any disruption to the article? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. As implied above. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Paul Cézanne

    Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Lolong (TV series)

    Reason: Continuous unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 13:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No reverts on article for a couple of days. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Subhas Chandra Bose

    Reason: Requesting temporary protection (extended confirmed) due to recent edit warring between multiple users. Likely the product of his upcoming birth anniversary. Yue🌙 22:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked: SuvGh (talk · contribs) blocked by The Bushranger. for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    EnterpriseDB

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Long history of COI editing and promotion. See username of this editor, , , , recent edit warring . --Richard Yin (talk) 23:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 23:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
    I think it's worth considering protecting the page anyway, given that this has gone on for years across multiple accounts/IPs. --Richard Yin (talk) 23:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
    Declined for now as, since I blocked the account causing trouble today, it was the first significant editing to the article in three months. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Stewart Rhodes

    Indefinite semi-protection: Preemptive measure due to rampant J6 related vandalism. -FactsheetPete (talk) 23:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    New Azerbaijan Party

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered users keep removing the 'anti-colonialism' from the infobox, while keeping the reference intact. therefore I request semi protection, most useful edits have been done by registered users. – Nar 2608 – 02:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article gets light editing as it is; it seems like the editors are handling the disruption well enough for now. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Bigg Boss Kannada season 11

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Reality TV show with only the final episode to go, lots of IP edits pushing their preferred winner and just being disruptive. A week a peace would be helpful to the regular maintainers. Ravensfire (talk) 06:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Flag of Mozambique

    Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection for one day. The article is the main DYK on the front page today and the topic-matter is inviting more anonymous vandalism than is usual or expected. Yue🌙 07:21, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    List of presidents of the United States

    Reason: Persistent edit warring by (multiple new users? Multiple socks?) Users have been repeatedly asked to go to the tp and discuss, but so far 'no go'. Thanks - \\'cLf 07:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 08:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Chief of the General Staff (Pakistan)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP continues to make unsourced edits. WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 07:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Little Princess (British TV series)

    Reason: Persistent vandalism by anonymous IP addresses Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    User talk:Gotitbro

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Frost 09:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    @Gotitbro: Do you want it protected? In any case, I removed the personal attacks from view, for the time being. Lectonar (talk) 09:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Shortcuts

    Dave Isaacson

    Reason: The edit includes a source from the Department of Defense Inspector General and the page isn't allowed to include that source. Airman79 (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    @Airman79: This request is a request to lower protection on a title that isn't protected, and reads more like an edit request. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v 00:39, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
    There is no Misplaced Pages page for Dave Isaacson. Most likely the requester intended to refer to David Isaacson. Still, that is not a page under any form of protection. EdJohnston (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
    Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 04:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Monitorapp

    Reason: Page is protected from 2018. I am trying to publish the draft I wrote, but I keep getting blocked. Please help me lift this protection. Tashialala (talk) 07:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined @Tashialala: I suggest you run your draft through the WP:AFC process. We can unprotect if it gets accepted. Lectonar (talk) 08:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Windows NT 3.51

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 08:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Further information: Misplaced Pages:Edit requests


    Joe Biden

    Remove: "Historians and political scientists rank Bozo as above average in historical rankings of American presidents."

    Way too soon to suggest that in the main text of the article! He has barely left office, its going to be at least a few months before such a bold claim can be made. Is there really enough historians and political scientists saying this to justify this claim? BlunanNation (talk) 08:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

    Israel–Hamas war

    Currently, the lede states "On 7 October 2023, Hamas-led militant groups launched a surprise attack on Israel, taking 251 captive, against which Israelis responded applying the controversial Hannibal Directive, resulting in the death of 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals, among which 815 civilians.". This implies that the majority of the casualties were caused by Israel applying the Hannibal Directive, and despite some cases of casualties due to this, no credible source has made the claim that the majority of casualties originate from it. I suggest changing the lede back to what it was before it was randomly edited to the current lede without any discussion on the talk page about it, to "On 7 October 2023, Hamas-led militant groups launched a surprise attack on Israel, killing 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals and taking 251 captive." Aradkipod (talk) 12:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

    Israel–Hamas war

    In the section labeled "Initial Israeli counter-operation (October 2023)" it states the following: "A July 2024 Haaretz investigation revealed that the IDF ordered the Hannibal Directive to be used, killing many Israeli civilians and soldiers. An ABC News (Australia) investigation reported that at least 13 civilians were killed in a 'Hannibal' incident in Beeri."

    These sentences are incorrect and not supported by the sourced references. First off, the word "many" in the first sentence is gratuitous, misleading, and, perhaps most importantly, not supported by the Haaretz article it references, which never concludes that any citizens were killed as a direct result of a so-called "Hannibal" directive. Nowhere in the article does it state that the Hannibal directive can be tied to *any* deaths, let alone "many" deaths. Any reference in the article to potential deaths caused by a Hannibal directive are stated as questions, or that investigations are forthcoming. (e.g., "Haaretz does not know whether or how many civilians and soldiers were hit due to these procedures, but the cumulative data indicates that many of the kidnapped people were at risk, exposed to Israeli gunfire, even if they were not the target.") Either way, it certainly does not conclude that "many" deaths were tied to the use of the "Hannibal directive" which is highly misleading.

    Similarly, as to the second sentence, the ABC News (Australia) does not conclude that " at least 13 civilians were killed in a 'Hannibal' incident in Beeri". It discusses a tank shooting at a house in Kibbutz Berri , but never states that there is evidence that the IDF tank fire resulted in the death of 13 civilians -- as opposed to the 40 Hamas gunmen who were holding them captive and engaged in a "firefight" with the IDF at the time of the tank fire. The 40 Hamas gunmen could just as easily have killed them as opposed to tank fire. Indeed, an eyewitness stated "Mr Shifroni's aunt Ayala and her grand-niece Liel and grand-nephew Yanai were all killed at Pessi's house — he believes by terrorists", not by the IDF and ""There are a few others that we still don't know and we may never know what exactly killed them." Later on in the article, it states "The team determined that most of the hostages were likely murdered by the terrorists, and further inquiries and reviews of additional findings are necessary.".

    I propose that the sentences be re-worded as follows: "A July 2024 Haaretz investigation revealed that the IDF ordered the Hannibal Directive to be used at three locations, putting the lives of some Israeli civilians being held by Hamas at those locations at risk.. An ABC News (Australia) investigation reported that after a prolonged firefight in Kibbutz Be'eri with around 40 Hamas gunmen who had been holding 15 hostages inside and outside, 13 of the hostages may have been killed by either the Hamas captors or IDF tank fire." 

    Apndrew (talk) 05:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Sar Sokha

    this website is using wrong prime minister sor sokha picture please delete for purpose to not let other see the wrong picture and confuse about it StvenZzz (talk) 05:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Done by the person who submitted the request in the first place. (It would have been declined in the first place as the page isn't protected.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v 06:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Israel–Hamas war

    Since I cannot reply to my original request on this, I am starting a new request with a different source for the request and a revised sentence:

    In the fourth paragraph of the entry, it states."A case accusing Israel of committing genocide is being reviewed by the International Court of Justice,...."

    This should be changed to "Cases accusing both Israel and Hamas of committing genocide have been lodged with or are being reviewed by the International Court of Justice,..."

    This change is supported by multiple references: https://www.timesofisrael.com/9-bereaved-israeli-families-bring-icc-war-crime-genocide-complaint-against-hamas/ "The families of nine Israeli victims of the October 7 Hamas massacre have lodged a complaint at the International Criminal Court (ICC) for suspected war crimes."

    and

    https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20231103-israeli-families-bring-war-crime-complaint-to-icc-lawyer)

    The change is necessary for accuracy, balance, and neutral point of view. 

    Apndrew (talk) 06:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Archive.

    Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions Add topic