Misplaced Pages

Didymelaceae: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:32, 9 June 2013 editRkitko (talk | contribs)51,198 edits ref← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:10, 28 December 2024 edit undoJlwoodwa (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers83,607 edits Change categorization templates (via redirect-helper) 
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
{{Expand Spanish|Didymelaceae|topic=sci|date=December 2009}}
]'']]


{{Redirect category shell|
'''Didymelaceae''' <small>]</small> is a ] of ] that contains a single genus, '']''. The family has been recognised by a number of taxonomists, at least over the past few decades.
{{R from monotypic taxon|plant}}
{{R from move}}
{{R with history}}
{{R with Wikidata item}}
}}


The ] of 2003 does not recognise the family as such, the plants involved being included in the family ]. However, APG II does allow the option of segregating this family, as an optional segregate; it is then unplaced as to order and left among the basal lineages of the ]. The ] of 2009 also does not recognise Didymelaceae but includes the genus ''Didymeles'' in the Buxaceae under the order ] in the eudicots.<ref name="apgiii">{{Citation |last=Angiosperm Phylogeny Group |year=2009 |title=An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III |journal=Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society |volume=161 |issue=2 |pages=105–121 |url=http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122630309/abstract |accessdate=2010–12–10 |doi=10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x }}</ref>

This represents a slight change from the ], of 1998, which firmly did recognised the family, with the same placement.

The family consists of a single genus only, '']'', with probably two species of evergreen trees, restricted to ] and the ].

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==External links==
* in L. Watson and M.J. Dallwitz (1992 onwards).
*

⚫ ]
] ]
⚫ ]

{{Link GA|es}}

Latest revision as of 01:10, 28 December 2024

Redirect to:

This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
  • From a monotypic taxon: This is a redirect from a monotypic plant taxon to its only lower-ranking member. In a biology-related article, when for example a family has only one genus, the family may be a redirect to the genus.
    • Use {{R to monotypic taxon}} when making a redirect to a monotypic taxon from its only member, for example, from a species to the genus of which it is the only member.
  • From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.
  • With history: This is a redirect from a page containing substantive page history. This page is kept as a redirect to preserve its former content and attributions. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated), nor delete this page.
    • This template should not be used for redirects having some edit history but no meaningful content in their previous versions, nor for redirects created as a result of a page merge (use {{R from merge}} instead), nor for redirects from a title that forms a historic part of Misplaced Pages (use {{R with old history}} instead).
When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.
Categories:
Didymelaceae: Difference between revisions Add topic