Misplaced Pages

User talk:ThinkEnemies: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:20, 10 September 2013 editThinkEnemies (talk | contribs)3,775 edits User:ThinkEnemies reported by User:DD2K (Result: 24 hours & page protected): explain← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:20, 22 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(34 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{retired|border=dashed 3px red|bgcolor=white|fgcolor=blue|date=the 12th anniversary of 9/11}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
{{center|Instead of accepting a probable block reduction from indefinite to a month at the most, ThinkEnemies will be taking his talents elsewhere. Misplaced Pages loses another awesome editor, which seems to be the norm if anyone is actually paying attention to the current state of this project. Peace be with you. ]<u>]</u> 22:38, 11 September 2013 (UTC)}}
|archiveprefix=User talk:ThinkEnemies/Archives/
|format=Y/F
|age=240
|index=yes
|archivebox=yes
|box-advert=yes
}}
{{Signpost-subscription|left}}
]


== So long ==


Sorry to see you leave in this manner. ] (]) 18:44, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
'''''ThinkEnemies''' is derived from a ] encountered while registering to edit Misplaced Pages. There is no deep, profound meaning. Unfortunately, ThinkEnemies has no meaning at all. If defined based on contributions, ThinkEnemies would be synonymous with ].''


Glad to see you gone.--]<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 20:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)







<!-- New sections below this point-->

== ] closed ==

An arbitration case, in which you were named as party, has now closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

{{quotation|1=
Pages related to the ], broadly construed, are placed under ]. This sanction supersedes the existing community sanctions.<p>

The ] are lifted.<p>

{{user|Goethean}}, {{user|North8000}}, {{user|Malke 2010}}, {{user|Xenophrenic}}, {{user|Arthur Rubin}}, {{user|Ubikwit}}, {{user|Phoenix and Winslow}} are indefinitely ] from all pages relating to the ], broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed to the Arbitration Committee after no less than six months have passed from the closing of this case.<p>

{{user|Collect}} is ] from all pages relating to the ], broadly construed. This topic ban will expire after six months from the date this case is closed on.<p>

{{user|Xenophrenic}} is indefinitely prohibited from ], {{user|Collect}} anywhere on Misplaced Pages (subject to the ]).<p>

{{user|Snowded}} and {{user|Phoenix and Winslow}} are indefinitely prohibited from ], each other anywhere on Misplaced Pages (subject to the ]).
}}

For the Arbitration Committee, ''']''' (] • ] • ]) 07:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

==Are you still editing?==

You seem to be one of the few who dodged the big ban hammer in the ArbCom proceeding. ] has been nominated for deletion. I think they may be ] since the RFC was just closed with a "keep" consensus. If you have anything to add to the deletion discussion, please do. ] (]) 20:20, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

== September 2013 ==
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''I will give you an opportunity to self-revert before I report this.'' ] (]) 20:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: 24 hours & page protected) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|RealClearPolitics}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|ThinkEnemies}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|572381572|18:42, 10 September 2013 (UTC)}} "clear OR/SYN, as cannot be verified by cited source"
# {{diff2|572394631|20:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 572392612 by ] (])I'm so sorry but your world view cant fix the fact your data doesn't support your retarded ass interpretation of cited refs"
# {{diff2|572395121|20:30, 10 September 2013 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 572394899 by ] (])consensus nononononononononono maybe you meant constupid"
# {{diff2|572395786|20:34, 10 September 2013 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 572395531 by ] (]) I'm ready to accept how certain people blame human events for their nuttiness."

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|572395977|20:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC)}} "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on ]. (])"

;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


;<u>Comments:</u>

Not only is the editor clearly edit warring, his comments(both in edit summaries and on the Talk page) are ].
. Plus 2 more. ] (]) 20:47, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

*{{AN3|b|24 hours}} for a specific violation of 3RR, and {{AN3|p}} for 4 days to prevent further edit warring from other users. ] <sup>(] • ])</sup> 21:12, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

The blocking admin will explain: Not only is the editor clearly edit warring, his comments(both in edit summaries and on the Talk page) are personal attacks.

Latest revision as of 20:20, 22 February 2023

Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages as of the 12th anniversary of 9/11. Instead of accepting a probable block reduction from indefinite to a month at the most, ThinkEnemies will be taking his talents elsewhere. Misplaced Pages loses another awesome editor, which seems to be the norm if anyone is actually paying attention to the current state of this project. Peace be with you. TETalk 22:38, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

So long

Sorry to see you leave in this manner. Arzel (talk) 18:44, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Glad to see you gone.--Ubikwit見学/迷惑 20:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

User talk:ThinkEnemies: Difference between revisions Add topic