| Revision as of 11:34, 5 October 2013 editKrish! (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,804 edits Undid revision 575819476 by 69.249.184.7 (talk)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:25, 11 November 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,311,938 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Krish!/Archive 13) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Collapse top|title=Archives|bg=SkyBlue}} | |||
| <div class="usermessage"><div class="plainlinks">Leave me a '''''' | Send me an ]. ]</div></div> | |||
| <div style="float:right; width:100%"> | |||
| <div style="padding: 10px; font-size: 13px; font-family: Tahoma MS; text-align: left;"> | |||
| <div style="border-style: Solid; border-width: 5px; border-color: DeepPink; padding: 100;"> | |||
| {{archive box|search=yes|auto=yes|image=File:Gnome-fs-directory.svg|age=30}} | {{archive box|search=yes|auto=yes|image=File:Gnome-fs-directory.svg|age=30}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 50K | |maxarchivesize = 50K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 13 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 5 | |minthreadsleft = 5 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| |algo = old(30d) | |algo = old(30d) | ||
| |archive = User talk: |
|archive = User talk:Krish!/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{Collapse bottom}} | |||
| == ARBIPA sanctions reminder == | |||
| == Disambiguation link notification for September 9 == | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| You have shown interest in ], ], and ]. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:29, 9 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 15:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :May I know what's the point of this warning masquerading as an innocent message being posted on my talk, {{u|Kautilya3}}? I don't give a damn about politics and these so-called "restricted" and "hidden" sections of Misplaced Pages. I don't have any interest, BTW. I just edited a film article regarding its reception where I stumbled upon unknowingly and the whole "secret society of Misplaced Pages" got threatened? Says a lot about this site.] | ] 15:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :: You have an ARBIPA alert before, which has now expired and so I gave a renewed alert. | |||
| :: The film you speak about is an Indian film dealing with Indian situations and politics and is very well covered under the ARBIPA sanctions. -- ] (]) 15:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :::Is discussing Holocaust or movies about that also under sanctions? So how is it different for a similar thing that happened in the Indian region of Kashmir? And, also FYI, my "edits" which were reverted BTW, were not even related to the film but how the reception section was written. So are we not even allowed to question bias and lack of NPOV, which is an important rule on Misplaced Pages? Glad these sanctions are not in real life as that film might not have been made or released. Don't worry I will not touch any political article here as it's not my cup of tea.] | ] 15:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::::] are indeed under sanctions, as is the ]. ] (]) 12:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::::The Arbitration Committee("ArbCom") places sanctions in topic areas identified as having extensive and intractable disruption that lesser remedies does not address. ] (]) 12:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ==Page block== | |||
| Your requests will get done faster if you don't ask for a particular copyeditor; for example, I'm working on other things and probably won't have time for requests until next month. If you have trouble at ] and ], chances are it's for a reason other than the copyedit. All the best, ]] 19:50, 17 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| You have been blocked from editing ] for two months for tendentious editing. Please see for more details. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. ] | ] 11:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC). | |||
| :{{u|Bishonen}} Thank you for blocking me to edit this page. Now I don't have to worry about my mental health. Also, I don't have time for Misplaced Pages like I used to have. So, it's really a blessing that I am barred from editing that page. So I am not going to appeal.] | ] 11:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::Krish, I honestly think it's better for you! Trust me, you don't need that round of intensive pressure. ] • <sup>'']''</sup> 11:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{u|Shshshsh}} Trust me, my last 24 hours got wasted because of this. I mean since it's a newly released film, I searched it on Google and then came to Misplaced Pages and just stumbled upon the biased edits. It's not like I was editing this article before. I have no political opinions but as a normal reader, I questioned the texts and then as an editor tried to correct it. I mean my edits don't even have to do with politics but the reception of the film. It's so funny and frustrating at the same time. Anyways, this page block is a blessing in disguise.] | ] 11:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::I feel your pain and you should appeal and stand for what you feel right. ] (]) 06:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0" | |||
| {{GOCEstartce|article=Kaminey|sign=Cheers, ] (]) 00:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
| |style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">June 2022 Backlog Drive</span> | |||
| {{GOCEtb|article=Kaminey|sign=Plot section reduced to around 850 words. Cheers, ] (]) 03:26, 24 September 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| * On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. | |||
| * Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. | |||
| * Interested in taking part? ''']'''! | |||
| |- | |||
| |colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.<br> ] to opt out of any future messages. | |||
| (] · ]) ''']''' 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| |} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Buidhe@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Good_articles/GAN_Backlog_Drives/Mailing_list&oldid=1090143622 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == | |||
| {{GOCEstartce|article=Fashion (film)|sign=Cheers, ] (]) 03:02, 25 September 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
| {{GOCEtb|article=Fashion (film)|sign=Cheers,] (]) 08:19, 28 September 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| == '']'' == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| {{GOCEtb|article=Aitraaz|sign= ]] 17:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1124425184 --> | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:25, 11 November 2023
| Archives | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ARBIPA sanctions reminder
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Kautilya3 (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- May I know what's the point of this warning masquerading as an innocent message being posted on my talk, Kautilya3? I don't give a damn about politics and these so-called "restricted" and "hidden" sections of Misplaced Pages. I don't have any interest, BTW. I just edited a film article regarding its reception where I stumbled upon unknowingly and the whole "secret society of Misplaced Pages" got threatened? Says a lot about this site.Krish | Talk To Me 15:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- You have received an ARBIPA alert before, which has now expired and so I gave a renewed alert.
- The film you speak about is an Indian film dealing with Indian situations and politics and is very well covered under the ARBIPA sanctions. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Is discussing Holocaust or movies about that also under sanctions? So how is it different for a similar thing that happened in the Indian region of Kashmir? And, also FYI, my "edits" which were reverted BTW, were not even related to the film but how the reception section was written. So are we not even allowed to question bias and lack of NPOV, which is an important rule on Misplaced Pages? Glad these sanctions are not in real life as that film might not have been made or released. Don't worry I will not touch any political article here as it's not my cup of tea.Krish | Talk To Me 15:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Certain aspects of the Holocaust are indeed under sanctions, as is the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. 331dot (talk) 12:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- The Arbitration Committee("ArbCom") places sanctions in topic areas identified as having extensive and intractable disruption that lesser remedies does not address. 331dot (talk) 12:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Is discussing Holocaust or movies about that also under sanctions? So how is it different for a similar thing that happened in the Indian region of Kashmir? And, also FYI, my "edits" which were reverted BTW, were not even related to the film but how the reception section was written. So are we not even allowed to question bias and lack of NPOV, which is an important rule on Misplaced Pages? Glad these sanctions are not in real life as that film might not have been made or released. Don't worry I will not touch any political article here as it's not my cup of tea.Krish | Talk To Me 15:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Page block
You have been blocked from editing The Kashmir files for two months for tendentious editing. Please see for more details. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 11:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC).
- Bishonen Thank you for blocking me to edit this page. Now I don't have to worry about my mental health. Also, I don't have time for Misplaced Pages like I used to have. So, it's really a blessing that I am barred from editing that page. So I am not going to appeal.Krish | Talk To Me 11:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Krish, I honestly think it's better for you! Trust me, you don't need that round of intensive pressure. Shahid • 11:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Shshshsh Trust me, my last 24 hours got wasted because of this. I mean since it's a newly released film, I searched it on Google and then came to Misplaced Pages and just stumbled upon the biased edits. It's not like I was editing this article before. I have no political opinions but as a normal reader, I questioned the texts and then as an editor tried to correct it. I mean my edits don't even have to do with politics but the reception of the film. It's so funny and frustrating at the same time. Anyways, this page block is a blessing in disguise.Krish | Talk To Me 11:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- I feel your pain and you should appeal and stand for what you feel right. Dsnb07 (talk) 06:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Krish, I honestly think it's better for you! Trust me, you don't need that round of intensive pressure. Shahid • 11:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Frozen (2013 film)
Frozen (2013 film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. TompaDompa (talk) 22:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)