Revision as of 04:20, 15 October 2013 editBus stop (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers44,012 edits Judaism and violence and Judaism and peace are separate articles, as are almost all articles; they each stand on their own terms← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:14, 8 December 2024 edit undoBeeblebrox (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators114,425 editsm Removing link(s) Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Steven Bayme closed as delete (XFDcloser) | ||
(315 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|none}} | |||
{{merge from|Judaism and peace|discuss=Talk:Views of violence in Judaism#Proposed merge with Judaism and peace|date=May 2013}} | |||
{{ |
{{Distinguish|Judaism and warfare|Judaism and peace}} | ||
]'s doctrines and texts have sometimes been associated with violence or anti-violence. Laws requiring the eradication of evil, sometimes using violent means, exist in the ]. However, Judaism also contains ].<ref name="Broyde">Fighting the War and the Peace: Battlefield Ethics, Peace Talks, Treaties, and Pacifism in the Jewish Tradition. Michael J. Broyde, 1998, p. 1</ref><ref name="Goldsmith Ed. 1991 181">*Reuven Firestone (2004), "Judaism on Violence and Reconciliation: An examination of key sources" in ''Beyond violence: religious sources of social transformation in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam'', Fordham Univ Press, 2004, pp. 77, 81. | |||
{{Cite book | *{{Cite book | ||
|title=Dynamic Judaism: the essential writings of Mordecai M. Kaplan | |title=Dynamic Judaism: the essential writings of Mordecai M. Kaplan | ||
|first=Emanuel S. | |first=Emanuel S. | ||
|last=Goldsmith (Ed.) | |last=Goldsmith (Ed.) | ||
|publisher=Fordham Univ Press | |publisher=Fordham Univ Press | ||
|year= |
|year=1991 | ||
| |
|isbn=0-8232-1310-2 | ||
|page=181 | |||
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book | |||
|title=Morality, halakha, and the Jewish tradition | |||
|first=Shubert | |||
|last=Spero | |||
|publisher=KTAV Publishing House, Inc. | |||
|year=1983 | |||
|ISBN=0-87068-727-1 | |||
|pages= 137–318 | |||
}}</ref><ref name="Goldsmith Ed. 1991 181">*Reuven Firestone (2004), "Judaism on Violence and Reconciliation: An examination of key sources" in ''Beyond violence: religious sources of social transformation in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam'', Fordham Univ Press, 2004, pp 77, 81. | |||
*{{Cite book | |||
|title=Dynamic Judaism: the essential writings of Mordecai M. Kaplan | |||
|first=Emanuel S. | |||
|last=Goldsmith (Ed.) | |||
|publisher= Fordham Univ Press | |||
|year= 1991 | |||
|ISBN= 0823213102 | |||
|page=181 | |page=181 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 32: | Line 15: | ||
|first=Shubert | |first=Shubert | ||
|last=Spero | |last=Spero | ||
|publisher= |
|publisher=KTAV Publishing House, Inc. | ||
|year=1983 | |year=1983 | ||
|isbn=0-87068-727-1 | |||
|ISBN= 0870687271 | |||
|pages= |
|pages=137–318 | ||
}}</ref> There is often a juxtaposition of Judaic law and theology to violence and ] by groups and individuals. Attitudes and laws towards both peace and violence exist within the Jewish tradition.<ref name="Broyde"/> Throughout history, Judaism's religious texts or precepts have been used to promote<ref name="Carl. S. Ehrlich 1999">Carl. S. Ehrlich (1999) "Joshua, Judaism, and Genocide", in | |||
}} | |||
*{{Cite book | |||
|title=The Peace and Violence of Judaism:From the Bible to Modern Zionism | |||
|first=Robert | |||
|last=Eisen | |||
|publisher=Oxford University Press | |||
|year=2011 | |||
}} | |||
</ref> This article deals with the juxtaposition of Judaic law and theology to violence and non-violence by groups and individuals. Attitudes and laws towards both peace and violence exist within the Jewish tradition.<ref name="Broyde"/> Throughout history, ]'s religious texts or precepts have been known to both oppose violence,<ref name="platform">The Columbus Platform: The Guiding Principles of Reform Judaism, 1937</ref> as well as promote it in certain cases.<ref>Carl. S. Ehrlich (1999) "Joshua, Judaism, and Genocide", in | |||
''Jewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century'', | ''Jewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century'', | ||
Judit Targarona Borrás, Ángel Sáenz-Badillos (Eds). 1999, Brill.</ref><ref>{{Cite book | Judit Targarona Borrás, Ángel Sáenz-Badillos (Eds). 1999, Brill.</ref><ref name="Horowitz 2006">{{Cite book | ||
|title=Reckless rites: Purim and the legacy of Jewish violence | |title=Reckless rites: Purim and the legacy of Jewish violence | ||
|first=Elliott S. | |first=Elliott S. | ||
|last=Horowitz | |last=Horowitz | ||
|publisher= Princeton University Press | |publisher= Princeton University Press | ||
|year= |
|year=2006 | ||
|isbn=0-691-12491-4 | |||
|ISBN= 0691124914 | |||
}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book | }}</ref><ref name="Stern 2004">{{Cite book | ||
|title=Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill, Jessica Stern | |title=Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill, Jessica Stern | ||
|first=Jessica | |first=Jessica | ||
|last=Stern | |last=Stern | ||
|publisher=HarperCollins | |publisher=HarperCollins | ||
|year= |
|year=2004 | ||
|isbn=0-06-050533-8}}</ref> as well as oppose violence.<ref name="platform">The Columbus Platform: The Guiding Principles of Reform Judaism, 1937</ref> | |||
|ISBN=0-06-050533-8}}</ref> | |||
== Normative Judaism == | |||
==Rejection of Violence and Pursuit of Peace== | |||
{{ |
{{See also|Judaism and peace}} | ||
<!-- {{rquote|right|The Jews are the mildest of men, passionately hostile to violence. That obstinate sweetness which they conserve in the midst of the most atrocious persecution, that sense of justice and of reason which they put up as their sole defense against a hostile, brutal, and unjust society, is perhaps the best part of the message they bring to us and the true mark of their greatness.|] |
<!-- {{rquote|right|The Jews are the mildest of men, passionately hostile to violence. That obstinate sweetness which they conserve in the midst of the most atrocious persecution, that sense of justice and of reason which they put up as their sole defense against a hostile, brutal, and unjust society, is perhaps the best part of the message they bring to us and the true mark of their greatness.|]<ref>Jean-Paul Sartre, 1946, Reflexions sur la question juive</ref>}} --> | ||
Normative Judaism is not pacifist and violence is condoned in the service of self-defence.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Co-existence of Violence and Non-Violence in Judaism |url=http://www.wcc-coe.org/wcc/what/interreligious/cd39-07.html |access-date=2010-12-09}}</ref> J. Patout Burns asserts that Jewish tradition clearly posits the principle of minimization of violence. This principle can be stated as "(wherever) Jewish law allows violence to keep an evil from occurring, it mandates that the minimal amount of violence be used to accomplish one's goal."<ref>{{cite book |title=War and its discontents: pacifism and quietism in the Abrahamic traditions |first=J. Patout |last=Burns |publisher=Georgetown University Press |year=1996 |page=18}}</ref><ref name="koltora"/> Notwithstanding the ] associated with the various ] in the state of Israel all vying for official recognition, in 1997 ] of the ] pushed back on assertions made by ] that the State's elevation of ] as the sole arbiter over personal status issues would inevitably lead to violence.<ref>Niebuhr, Gustav (April 17, 1997) {{ProQuest|260532996}} '']''. Retrieved April 18, 2024. {{subscription required}}</ref> Sure enough, in a May 2022 incident which took place at the ], ] seminarians waving ] flags, whose delegation was organized by the ] and Eretz Hakodesh—an American affiliate of ]—jeered at, drowned out with whistles and spat upon members of the ] group over ].<ref>Maltz, Judy (May 16, 2022) {{ProQuest|2664895284}} '']''. Retrieved April 18, 2024. {{subscription required}}</ref> | |||
Judaism's religious texts endorse compassion and peace, and the Hebrew Bible contains the well-known commandment to "love thy neighbor as thyself".<ref name="Goldsmith Ed. 1991 181"/> In fact, the love of peace and the pursuit of peace is one of the key principles in Jewish law. Jewish tradition permits waging war and killing in certain cases, however, the requirement is that one always seek a just peace before waging war.<ref name="Broyde"/> | |||
=== Nonviolence === | |||
According to the 1947 ] of ], "Judaism, from the days of the prophets, has proclaimed to mankind the ideal of universal peace, striving for spiritual and physical disarmament of all nations. Judaism rejects violence and relies upon moral education, love and sympathy."<ref name="platform"/> | |||
], Judaism's religious texts endorse compassion and peace. The ] contains the well-known commandment to "love thy neighbor as thyself".<ref name="Goldsmith Ed. 1991 181"/> According to the 1937 ] of ], "Judaism, from the days of the prophets, has proclaimed to mankind the ideal of universal peace, striving for spiritual and physical disarmament of all nations. Judaism rejects violence and relies upon moral education, love and sympathy."<ref name="platform"/> | |||
The philosophy of ] has roots in Judaism, going back to the ] of the middle 3rd century. |
The philosophy of ] has roots in Judaism, going back to the ] of the middle 3rd century. While absolute nonviolence is not a requirement of Judaism, the religion so sharply restricts the use of violence, that nonviolence often becomes the only way to fulfilling a life of truth, justice and peace, which Judaism considers to be the three tools for the preservation of the world.<ref>Sandra L. Bloom, Michael Reichert, Bearing witness: violence and collective responsibility. Routledge, 1998. {{ISBN|978-0789004789}}</ref>{{rp|242}} | ||
== Warfare == | |||
Jewish law (past and present) does not permit any use of violence unless it is in self-defense.<ref name="koltora"/> Any person that even raises his hand in order to hit a nother person is called "evil.".<ref>. Ask.com. Retrieved on 2010-10-27.</ref> | |||
{{Main|Judaism and warfare|Jewish military history}} | |||
Guidelines from the Torah to the 'Jewish Way to Fight a War': When the time for war has arrived, Jewish soldiers are expected to abide by specific laws and values when fighting. Jewish war ethics attempts to balance the value of maintaining human life with the necessity of fighting a war. Judaism is somewhat unique in that it demands adherence to Jewish values even while fighting a war. The Torah provides the following rules for how to fight a war. Pursue Peace Before Waging War. Preserve the Ecological Needs of the Environment. Maintain Sensitivity to Human Life. The Goal is Peace<ref>. Judaism.about.com (2009-12-17). Retrieved on 2010-10-27.</ref> | |||
The ancient commands (like those) of wars for the Israelites to eradicate idol worshipping do not apply in Judaism today. | |||
Jews are not taught to glorify violence. The rabbis of the Talmud saw war as an avoidable evil. They taught, 'The sword comes to the world because of delay of justice and through perversion of justice.' Jews have always hated war and Shalom expresses the hope for peace; in Judaism war is an evil, but at times a necessary one, yet, Judaism teaches that one has to go to great length to avoid it.<ref>''Judaism'' by Arye Forta, Heinemann, 1995, ISBN 978-0-435-30321-1 , p. 122 </ref> | |||
===Claims that monotheistic religions are inherently violent=== | |||
Some critics of religion such as Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer argue that all monotheistic religions are inherently violent. For example, Nelson-Pallmeyer writes that "Judaism, Christianity and Islam will continue to contribute to the destruction of the world until and unless each challenges violence in "sacred texts" and until each affirms nonviolent power of God".<ref>{{cite book|title=Is religion killing us?: violence in the Bible and the Quran |first=Jack |last=Nelson-Pallmeyer |publisher=Continuum International Publishing Group |year=2005 |page=136 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=tux7YjmQ8O0C&pg=PA136&dq=Judaism+%22violent+religion%22&hl=en&ei=aAgBTZrWLoHSsAP8v7WvCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CDcQ6AEwBDgK#v=onepage&q=Judaism%20%22violent%20religion%22&f=false}}</ref> | |||
Bruce Feiler writes that "Jews and Christians who smugly console themselves that Islam is the only violent religion are willfully ignoring their past. Nowhere is the struggle between faith and violence described more vividly, and with more stomach-turning details of ruthlessness, than in the Hebrew Bible".<ref>{{cite book |title=Where God was born: a journey by land to the roots of religion |first=Bruce S. |last=Feiler |publisher=HarperCollins |year=2005 |page=4 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=aBVoWhUs-HoC&pg=PA4&dq=Judaism+%22violent+religion%22&hl=en&ei=0woBTdWXOobUtQOo_-yvCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEQQ6AEwBjge#v=onepage&q&f=false}}</ref> Similarly, Burggraeve and Vervenne describe the Old Testament as full of violence and evidence of both a violent society and a violent god. They write that, "(i)n numerous Old Testament texts the power and glory of Israel's God is described in the language of violence." They assert that more than one thousand passages refer to YHWH as acting violently or supporting the violence of humans and that more than one hundred passages involve divine commands to kill humans.<ref>{{cite book |title=Swords into plowshares: theological reflections on peace |first1=Roger |last1=Burggraeve |first2=Marc |last2=Vervenne |publisher=Peeters Publishers |year=1991 |pages=82,109 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=q8KvY0W58eYC&pg=PA109&dq=%22violent+God%22&hl=en&ei=i9QBTcbXFs-UnQfDo93lDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CDUQ6AEwBDgK#v=onepage&q=%22violent%20God%22&f=false}}</ref> | |||
===Claims that Judaism is a violent religion=== | |||
Some Christian churches and theologians argue that Judaism is a violent religion and the god of Israel as a violent god. Reuven Firestone asserts that these assertions are usually made in the context of claims that Christianity is a religion of peace and that the god of Christianity is one that expresses only love.<ref>{{cite book |title=Beyond violence: religious sources of social transformation in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam |editor=Heft, James |publisher=Fordham Univ Press|year=2004|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=rxiINuHNAIUC&pg=PT96&dq=Judaism+%22violent+religion%22&hl=en&ei=GwUBTZPYG4-8sQOumMivCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Judaism%20%22violent%20religion%22&f=false}}</ref> | |||
===Principle of minimization of violence=== | |||
Normative Judaism is not pacifist and violence is condoned in the service of self-defense.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Co-existence of Violence and Non-Violence in Judaism |url=http://www.wcc-coe.org/wcc/what/interreligious/cd39-07.html |accessdate=2010-12-09}}</ref> J. Patout Burns asserts that Jewish tradition clearly posits the principle of minimization of violence. This principle can be stated as "(wherever) Jewish law allows violence to keep an evil from occurring, it mandates that the minimal amount of violence be used to accomplish one's goal."<ref>{{cite book |title=War and its discontents: pacifism and quietism in the Abrahamic traditions |first=J. Patout |last=Burns |publisher=Georgetown University Press |year=1996 |page=18}}</ref> | |||
==Warfare== | |||
{{Main|Judaism and war}} | |||
]: The Taking of Jericho, c. 1452–1460]] | ]: The Taking of Jericho, c. 1452–1460]] | ||
The biblical narrative about ], and the commands related to it, have had a deep influence on ] as well as ].<ref name="lemche315">], ''The Old Testament between theology and history: a critical survey'', Westminster John Knox Press, 2008, pp. 315–316:"The story of the 'morally supreme people' that defeats and exterminates another, inferior, nation was part of the ideological baggage of European imperialists and colonizers throughout the nineteenth century. It was also carried by European Jews who,... migrated to Palestine to inherit their ancestral country … In this modern version of the biblical narrative, the Palestinian population turned into 'Canaanites', supposed to be morally inferior to the Jews, and of course the Arabs were never considered their equals … The Bible was the instrument used to suppress the enemy".</ref> Throughout ], mainstream Jewish traditions have considered these texts purely historical or highly conditioned, and in any event, they are not considered relevant to later times.<ref>], "On the Political User of the Bible in Modern Israel: An Engaged Critique", in ''Pomegranates and golden bells: studies in biblical, Jewish, and Near Eastern ritual, law, and literature'', Eisenbrauns, 1995, pp. 467–469: | |||
<blockquote>No "national" commandment such as that of "conquest and settling the land" occurs in any of these summaries … introduces a distinction that Scripture does not recognize; nowhere are the obligations referred to in the summaries contingent on the achievement of the land-taking or the destruction of Israel's enemies. To suppose that they may be set aside or suspended for the accomplishment of national ends is a leap far beyond scripture.... The injunctions to take the land are embedded in narrative and give the appearance of being addressed to a specific generation, like the commandment to annihilate or expel the natives of Canaan, which refers specifically to the seven Canaanite nations... Now, had there been any inclination to generalize the law , it would have been easy for the talmudic sages to . But in fact the sages left the ancient herem law as they found it: applying to seven extinct nations.</blockquote></ref> | |||
The ] experienced a surge in militarism and violence which was aimed at curbing the encroachment of ] and ] influences in ]. Groups such as the ]<ref>Johnson, 1987. Quote: " saw themselves as reliving the Book of Joshua, reconquering the Promised Land from the pagans." (p. 106)</ref> the ], the ] at the ],<ref>Johnson, 1987. Quote: "Abundant evidence of services in the fort's synagogue and parts of fourteen scrolls of Biblical, sectarian and apocryphal books indicate that this was a G-d fearing garrison of militants, profoundly influenced by the terrible power of Jewish literature." (p. 140)</ref> and later the ], all derived their power from the biblical narrative of Hebrew conquest and hegemony over the ], sometimes garnering support of the rabbis,<ref>Johnson, 1987. Quote: "A rabbinic source says was recognized as Messiah by the greatest scholar of the age, the rabbi Akiva ben Joseph." (p. 141)</ref> and at other times their ambivalence.<ref>Johnson, 1987. Quote: "From the fragments of evidence we have, it looks as if Simon got little support from learned Jews and in the end lost what he had...The men of the rebellion were orthodox Jews who took great trouble, despite desperate circumstances, to observe the Mosaic law...But there is no evidence that Simon regarded himself as a Messiah, the anointed one or in any way a spiritual leader...He was in every respect a secular ruler, a ''nasi'' as he calls himself in his letters, harsh, practical, unbending, ruthless...The later rabbinic legends woven around the 'Son of a Star' seem to have no basis in fact. Simon was more of a prototype for a modern Zionist fighter: unromantic and professional, a man who lived and died a guerrilla and nationalist." (p. 142)</ref> | |||
Regarding war, the commandment of ] (Hebrew: מלחמת מצווה, "War by commandment") refers to a war during the times of the Bible when a king would go to war in order to fulfill something based on, and required by, the Torah.<ref>Maimonedies, Laws of Kings 5:1</ref> | |||
<blockquote> | |||
What is a milchemet mitzvah? It is a war to assist Israel against an enemy that has attacked them.<br />''-Maimonedies, Laws of Kings 5:1'' | |||
</blockquote> | |||
In modern times, the early ] saw the emergence of the ] organization ({{literal translation|Covenant of Peace}}). Deriving inspiration from the writings of ], its members sought to prod the nascent Zionist movement into a direction of peaceful coexistence with the Arabs in ] in a ] state.<ref>Asa-el, Amotz (5 September 2017) , ''The Jerusalem Post''. Retrieved 31 January 2024.</ref> These ideas eventually fell out of favor as Zionist militias ] began to emerge as a response to the 1921 ] and the subsequent ].<ref>Kessler, Oren (1 May 2021) , ''The Times of Israel''. Retrieved February 8, 2024.</ref> Since then, warfare which has been conducted by the ] is governed by Israeli law and regulation, which includes a ] code that is based in part on Jewish tradition; the ] combines international law, Israeli law, Jewish heritage and the IDF's own traditional ethical code.<ref name="idf-spirit">{{cite web|url=http://dover.idf.il/IDF/English/about/doctrine/ethics.htm |title=Ethics – The IDF Spirit|publisher=] |access-date=10 June 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090831080829/http://dover.idf.il/IDF/English/about/doctrine/ethics.htm|archive-date=31 August 2009 }}</ref> However, tension between actions of the Israeli government on the one hand, and ]s and '']'' (Jewish law) on the conduct of war on the other, have caused controversy within Israel and have provided a basis for ].<ref>{{Cite book|title=Fateful triangle: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinians|url=https://archive.org/details/fatefultriangleu0000chom_j7d0|url-access=registration|edition=revised 2nd|first=Noam|last=Chomsky|publisher=South End Press|year=1999|isbn=0-89608-601-1|pages=–154}}</ref> Some strains of radical ] promote aggressive war and justify them with biblical texts.<ref>Kravitz, Leonard, "What is Crime?", in ''Crime and punishment in Jewish law: essays and responses'', Editors ], ] Berghahn Books, 1999, p. 31. Quote:<blockquote>Sin has changed ; crime has changed. We bring a different sensibility to our reading of the sacred texts of the past, even the Torah. There are passages in it which to our modern minds command crimes, the kind of crimes which our age would call "crimes against humanity"... I think of the problematic section in the ] which contains the commandment to exact revenge against the Midianites by slaying every male and every female old enough to engage in sexual intercourse.... I used to think that were they suddenly to appear, no Jew would be willing to carry out such a commandment. Then ] appeared on the scene, and he was followed by ] and now I am not sure.... I find the commandment to commit ] against the Midianite unacceptable. To accept the commandment to do the same to "the Hittites, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Peruzzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites" seems to me to make permissible the Holocaust, the attempted genocide of the Jewish people.</blockquote></ref><ref>Lustick, Ian, ''For the land and the Lord: Jewish fundamentalism in Israel'', Council on Foreign Relations, 1988.</ref> | |||
Wars of this type do not need the approval of the ].{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}} | |||
== Forced conversion == | |||
This is in contrast to a Milkhemet Reshut (a discretionary war), which according to Jewish law require the permission of a Sanhedrin.{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}} These wars (discretionary wars) tend to be for economic reasons and had exemption clauses (Deuteronomy 20:5) while, milhemet mitzvah tended to be invoked in defensive wars, when vital interests were at risk and had no such exemption clauses.<ref>Mishnah, Tractate Sotah 8:7</ref> | |||
]s occurred under the ]. The Idumaens were forced to convert to Judaism, either by threats of exile, or threats of death, depending on the source.<ref>Flavius Josephus Antiquities 13.257–258</ref><ref>]</ref> | |||
The Talmud insists that before going to non-defensive war, the king would need to seek authorization from the ], as well as divine approval through the High Priest. As these institutions have not existed for 2,000 years, this virtually rules out the possibility of non-defensive war.<ref name="solomon"/> | |||
In ''Eusebíus, Christianity, and Judaism'' ] claims that "there is reason to think that ]' account of their conversion is substantially accurate." He also writes, "That these were not isolated instances but that forced conversion was a national policy is clear from the fact that ] (c. 80 BCE) demolished the city of ] in ], 'because the inhabitants would not agree to adopt the national custom of the Jews.{{'"}} Josephus, Antiquities. 13.15.4.<ref>Harold W. Attridge, Gōhei Hata (eds.). ''Eusebius, Christianity, and Judaism''. Wayne State University Press, 1992: p. 387.</ref> | |||
The permissibility of war is limited and the requirement is that one always seek a just peace before waging war.<ref name="Broyde">Fighting the War and the Peace: Battlefield Ethics, Peace Talks, Treaties, and Pacifism in the Jewish Tradition. Michael J. Broyde, 1998, p. 1</ref><ref>{{bibleverse||Deut|20:10|HE}}</ref> some liberal modern Jewish scholars hold that the calls to war these texts provide no longer apply, and that Jewish theology instructs Jews to leave vengeance to God.<ref name="slate1"> | |||
{{Cite news | |||
|url=http://www.slate.com/id/2246139 | |||
|title=The Ghosts of Purim Past: The holiday's violent beginnings—and what they mean for the Jewish future | |||
|first=Steven I. | |||
|last=Weiss | |||
|date=2010-02-26 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Dialogika"> | |||
{{Cite news | |||
|url=http://www.ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/educational-and-liturgical-materials/liturgical-resources/lent-easter/787-langer08mar22 | |||
|title=Violence and Vengeance: Purim and Good Friday | |||
|date=1998-03-28 | |||
|newspaper=Dialogika | |||
|publisher=Council of Centers on Jewish-Christian Relations | |||
}}</ref> | |||
] has written of the "policy of forced Judaization adopted by ], ] and Jannaeus", who offered "the conquered peoples a choice between expulsion or conversion".<ref>]. ''The Middle East Under Rome''. Harvard University Press, 2005: p. 15.</ref> | |||
===Laws of siege=== | |||
According to ], an offer of peace is to be made to any city which is besieged, conditional on the acceptance of terms of tribute.<ref name="solomon"/> According to ], on besieging a city in order to seize it, it must not be surrounded on all four sides but only on three sides, thus leaving a path of escape for whomever wishes to flee to save his life.<ref name="ethics"/> ], writing a century later, strengthened the rule and added a reason: "We are to learn to deal kindly with our enemy." <ref name="ethics"/> | |||
===Forbidden war tactics=== | |||
Jewish law prohibits the use of outright vandalism in warfare.<ref name="mjl"/> It forbids destruction of fruit trees as a tactic of war. It is also forbidden to break vessels, tear clothing, wreck that which is built up, stop fountains, or waste food in a destructive manner. Killing an animal needlessly or offering poisoned water to livestock are also forbidden.<ref name="mjl">. My Jewish Learning. Retrieved on 2010-10-27.</ref> According to Rabbi ] of Prague, Jewish law forbids the killing of innocent people, even in the course of a legitimate military engagement.<ref name="ethics">, By Dr. Michael Walzer</ref> | |||
===Wars of extermination in the Tanakh=== | |||
{{See also|Herem (war or property)}} | |||
The ] (Jewish Bible) contains ] that require the Israelites to exterminate seven Canaanite nations, and describes several wars of extermination that annihilated entire cities or groups of peoples. | |||
Wars of extermination are of historical interest only, and do not serve as a model within Judaism.<ref name="solomon"/> A formal declaration that the “seven nations” are no longer identifiable was made by ], around the year 100 CE.<ref name="solomon">Judaism and | |||
the ethics of war, Norman Solomon. International Review of the Red Cross. Volume 87 Number 858 June 2005</ref> | |||
Extermination is described in several of Judaism's biblical commandments, known as the ]:<ref>Eisenberg, Ronald L, ''The 613 mitzvot: a contemporary guide to the commandments of Judaism'', Schreiber Pub., 2005, pp 129-130</ref> | |||
* Not to keep alive any individual of the seven Canaanite nations (Deut. 20:16) | |||
* To exterminate the seven Canaanite nations from the land of Israel (Deut. 20:17) | |||
* Always to remember what Amalek did (Deut. 25:17) | |||
*That the evil done to us by Amalek shall not be forgotten (Deut. 25:19) | |||
*To destroy the seed of Amalek (Deut. 25:19) | |||
The extent of extermination is described in the commandment {{bibleverse||Deut|20:16-18|HE}} which orders the Israelites to "not leave alive anything that breathes… completely destroy them …".<ref>Ruttenberg, Danya, ''Jewish Choices, Jewish Voices: War and National Security'' Danya Ruttenberg (Ed.) | |||
page 54 (citing Reuven Kimelman, "The Ethics of National Power: Government and War from the Sources of Judaism", in ''Perspectives'', Feb 1987, pp 10-11)</ref> Several scholars have characterized the exterminations as ].<ref> | |||
Grenke, Arthur, ''God, greed, and genocide: the Holocaust through the centuries'', pp 17-30</ref> | |||
<ref>] - quoted in NPR article "Is The Bible More Violent Than The Quran?" by Barbara Hagerty. Online at .</ref> | |||
<ref>Kravitz, Leonard, "What is Crime?", in ''Crime and punishment in Jewish law: essays and responsa'', Editors ], ], Berghahn Books, 1999, p 31.</ref> | |||
<ref>Magid, Shaul, "Subversion as Return: Scripture, Dissent, and Renewal in Contemporary Judaism, in ''Subverting Scriptures: Critical Reflections on the Use of the Bible'' Beth Hawkins Benedix (Ed), pp 217-236, p 234.</ref> | |||
<ref>Cohn, Robert L, "Before Israel: The Canaanites as Other in Biblical Tradition", in ''The Other in Jewish thought and history: constructions of Jewish culture and identity'', Laurence Jay Silberstein, (Ed.), NYU Press, 1994, pp 76-77</ref> | |||
<ref>Boustan, Ra'anan S., ''Violence, Scripture, and Textual Practice in Early Judaism and Christianity'', BRILL, 2010, pp 3-5</ref> | |||
<ref>Firestone, Reuven, "Judaism on Violence and Reconciliation: An Examination of Key Sources", in ''Beyond violence: religious sources of social transformation in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam'', James Heft (Ed.), Fordham Univ Press, 2004, p 75</ref> | |||
<ref>Ehrlich, Carl S., "Joshua, Judaism, and Genocide" in ''Jewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century'', BRILL, 1999, pp 121-122</ref> | |||
<ref>Garber, Zev, "Deconstructing Theodicy and Amalekut", in ''Post-Shoah dialogues: re-thinking our texts together'', James F. Moore (Ed.), University Press of America, 2004, pp 241-243.</ref> | |||
<ref>Van Wees, Hans, "Genocide in the Ancient World", in ''The Oxford Handbook of Genocide Studies'', Donald Bloxham, A. Dirk Moses (Eds), p 242. | |||
</ref> | |||
====Victims==== | |||
The targets of the extermination commandments were the seven ] explicitly identified by God as targets in {{bibleverse||Deut|7:1-2|HE}} and {{bibleverse||Deut|20:16-18|HE}}.<ref name="Van Wees, p 242">Van Wees, p 242</ref> These seven tribes are ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. Most of these descended from the biblical figure ], as described in {{bibleverse||Gen|10:15-18|HE}}. In addition, two others tribes were subject to wars of extermination: ] ({{bibleverse|1|Samuel|15:1-20|HE}})<ref>Ruttenberg, p 54</ref> and ] ({{bibleverse||Numbers|31:1-18|HE}}). The extermination of the Canaanite nations is described primarily in the ] (especially {{bibleverse||Joshua|10:28-42|HE}}) which includes the ] described in {{bibleverse||Joshua|6:15-21|HE}}. | |||
The instruction God gives in {{bibleverse||Deut|20:16-18|HE}} is for Israelites to exterminate "everything that breathes", but the precise extent of the killing varied:<ref>*Van Wees, p 242</ref> The instruction was made with respect to the Amalekites {{bibleverse|1|Samuel|15:1-20|HE}}, Canaanites (]) {{bibleverse||Joshua|6:15-21|HE}}, Canaanite nations {{bibleverse||Joshua|10:28-42|HE}}, and Midianites {{bibleverse||Numbers|31:1-18|HE}}.<ref name="Van Wees, p 242"/> | |||
Some scholars such as Van Wees conclude that the biblical accounts of extermination are exaggerated, fictional, or metaphorical.<ref> | |||
*Van Wees, p 242, "largely fictional"</ref> In the archaeological community, the ] is very thoroughly studied, and the consensus of modern scholars is that the story of battle and the associated extermination are a ] and did not happen as described in the Book of Joshua.<ref>Ehrlich, pp 117</ref> For example, the ] describes the extermination of the Canaanite tribes, yet at a later time, {{bibleverse||Judges|1:1-2:5|HE}} suggests that the extermination was not complete.<ref>Ehrlich, p 119</ref> | |||
Likewise, it is not clear if the historical Amalekites were exterminated or not. 1 Samuel 15:7-8 implies ("He took Agag king of the Amalekites alive, and all his people he totally destroyed with the sword.") that - after Agag was also killed - the Amalekites were extinct, but in a later story in the time of Hezekiah, the Simeonites annihilated some Amalekites on Mount Seir, and settled in their place: "And five hundred of these Simeonites, led by Pelatiah, Neariah, Rephaiah and Uzziel, the sons of Ishi, invaded the hill country of Seir. They killed the remaining Amalekites who had escaped, and they have lived there to this day." ({{bibleverse|1|Chr|4:42-43|HE}}).{{citation needed|date=December 2010}} | |||
====As genocide==== | |||
{{See also|Genocides in history}} | |||
The wars of extermination have been characterized as ] by a number of scholars and commentators.<ref name="Van Wees, p 242"/><ref>Hagerty, Barbara, "Is The Bible More Violent Than The Quran?"; online at . Jenkins quote: "By the standards of the time, which is the 7th century A.D., the laws of war that are laid down by the Quran are actually reasonably humane," he says. "Then we turn to the Bible, and we actually find something that is for many people a real surprise. There is a specific kind of warfare laid down in the Bible which we can only call genocide."</ref><ref>Kravitz, Leonard, "What is Crime?", in ''Crime and punishment in Jewish law: essays and responsa'', Editors ], ] Berghahn Books, 1999, p 31: | |||
:"Sin has changed ; crime has changed. We bring a different sensibility to our reading of the sacred texts of the past, even the Torah. There are passages in it which to our modern minds command crimes, the kind of crimes which our age would call 'crimes against humanity' … I think of the problematic section in the ] which contains the commandment to exact revenge against the Midianites by slaying every male and every female old enough to engage in sexual intercourse…. I used to think that were they suddenly to appear, no Jew would be willing to carry out such a commandment. Then ] appeared on the scene, and he was followed by ] and now I am not sure…. I find the commandment to commit] against the Midianite unacceptable. To accept the commandment to do the same to 'the Hittites, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Peruzzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites' seems to me to make permissible the Holocaust, the attempted genocide of the Jewish people."</ref> Shaul Magid characterizes the commandment to exterminate the Midianites as a "genocidal edict", and asserts that rabbinical tradition continues to defend the edict into the 20th century.<ref>Shaul Magid, "Subversion as Return: Scripture, Dissent, and Renewal in Contemporary Judaism, in ''Subverting Scriptures: Critical Reflections on the Use of the Bible'' Beth Hawkins Benedix (Ed), pp 217-236; quote from p 234: | |||
:"The rabbinic tradition connects the commandment to destroy Midian in Numbers 31 to Genesis 37:36, … Thus Moses's call for 'revenge' killing here has a long history…. Perhaps the rabbinic assessment of Moses's reasons for rebuking Israel for keeping the Midianite women alive is captured by Yaakov Moshe Harlap… Harlap writes 'Moses's reasons (for having all the Midianite women killed) was that a person should not enter into a doubtful situation even if the intention is for the sake of heaven'. I cite this not to defend this position but to illustrate the way in which the tradition, even to the twentieth century, defends this genocidal edict."</ref> L. Daniel Hawk describes the extermination of Canaanites as "ethnic cleansing", but notes that the narrative includes contradictory indications that Canaanites were absorbed into Israeli society.<ref>Reading Bibles, writing bodies: identity and the Book | |||
Biblical limits | |||
Author Timothy Kandler Beal | |||
Editors Timothy Kandler Beal, David M. Gunn | |||
Edition illustrated | |||
Publisher Psychology Press, 1997, pp 153-163</ref><ref>Cohn, Robert L, "Before Israel: The Canaanites as Other in Biblical Tradition", in ''The Other in Jewish thought and history: constructions of Jewish culture and identity'', Laurence Jay Silberstein, (Ed.), NYU Press, 1994, pp 76-77: | |||
:"By representing the Canaanites stereotypically as people sunk in depravity , the biblical writers provide a moral justification for the conquest of their land by a just deity. Moreover, this depiction provides a rationale for the genocide of the Canaanites commanded in Deuteronomy (Deut 7:1-2) and purportedly accomplished by Joshua (Josh 10:40)."</ref> Ra'anan Boustan, Alex Jassen, and Calvin Roetzel assert that - in the modern era - the violence directed towards the Canaanites would be characterized as genocide.<ref>Ra'anan S. Boustan, Alex Jassen, and Calvin Roetzel, "Introduction: Violence, Scripture, and Textual Practice in Early Judaism and Christianity,” Biblical Interpretation 17.1–2 (2009): 1–11. Reprinted in Violence, Scripture, and Textual Practice in Early Judaism and Christianity, ed. Ra‘anan S. Boustan, Alex | |||
Jassen, and Calvin Roetzel (Leiden: Brill, 2010), 1–11: "The specific focus in this volume is violence and Scripture. Violence can be found throughout the pages of the Hebrew Bible… The Israelite God is portrayed as a divine warrior (Ex. 15:3); the Israelites themselves are commanded to obliterate the inhabitants of Canaan and are often presented as engaging in such holy wars; … Instigators of religious violence believe that they are carrying out God's directive as articulated in the Bible…. For example, the Deuteronomic directive to destroy entirely (herem) the Canaanites (Deut 20:15-18) is a thoroughly violent commandment - and in modern terms would be characterized as genocide. The later historical absence of any Canaanites, however, does not blunt this passage's violent legacy" (pp. 3-5). Compare Ehrlich, Carl S., "Joshua, Judaism, and Genocide," in "Jewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century" (Leiden: BRILL, 1999), 121–122: "The broad consensus of Jewish tradition has been that the conquest of the land belongs to the distant past. In this manner, any discomfort with the anachronistic notion of genocide to be found in the Joshua narrative could be passed off as something that belonged to a certain time and place, not {{sic|?|be}} be repeated. The restrictions on the waging of war in Maimonides and his biblical and rabbinical sources would seem to support this contention" (p. 121). "It was particularly in the field of archaeology that the ideological battle about Joshua was waged. It was felt that proving the veracity of the book of Joshua would in some way prove to be a justification of modern historical reality. In this manner, the battles of Joshua were viewed as paradigmatic for the modern age, not - it should be noted - in the sense of prescribing genocide against non-Jews, but in providing models for the reclamation of the land."</ref> Zev Garber characterizes the commandment to wage war on the Amalekites as genocide.<ref>Garber, Zev, "Deconstructing Theodicy and Amalekut", in "Post-Shoah dialogues: re-thinking our texts together," James F. Moore (Ed.), University Press of America, 2004, pp 241-243. | |||
:p 242: "Any attempt at understanding this warrant for genocide against the Amalekites and their descendants must start …"</ref> Pekka Pitkanen asserts that Deuteronomy involves "demonization of the opponent" which is typical of genocide, and he asserts that the genocide of the Canaanites was due to unique circumstances, and that "the biblical material should not be read as giving license for repeating it."<ref>Pitkanen, Pekka, "Memory, Witnesses, and Genocide in the Book of Joshua", in ''Reading the law: studies in honour of Gordon J. Wenham'', J. Gordon McConville, Karl Möller (Eds), Continuum International Publishing Group, 2007, pp 267-282 | |||
quote (Page 280-281): | |||
"The 'demonization of the opponent' that Deuteronomy advocates is precisely something that accompanies genocides. This then in fact speaks for the conceptual plausibility of the historical occurrence of the events portrayed in Joshua. In addition, that genocides are often triggered by war or some other severe crisis also speaks for the conceptual plausibility of the events portrayed in Joshua. … It is certainly right, I believe, to try to show that the genocide of the Canaanites (whether real or imaginary) was a unique set of events and that the biblical material should not be read as giving license for repeating it. … the theological difficulty of the is not mitigated by arguments against its historicity, since the text has in any case shown its capacity to mandate violence against peoples. … But we also saw that the book of Joshua advocates a vision where an important part of achieving an ideal society was to destroy anyone or anything not compatible with its central tenet of Yahwism."</ref> | |||
====Explanations==== | |||
]]] | |||
Several explanations for the extreme violence associated with the wars of extermination have been offered, some found in the ], others provided by Rabbinic commentators, and others hypothesized by scholars. | |||
In {{bibleverse||Deut|20:16-18|HE}} God tells the Israelites to exterminate the Canaanite nations, "otherwise, they will teach you to follow all the detestable things they do in worshiping their gods, and you will sin against the lord your God". Another reason was revenge for Midian's role in Israel's apostate behavior during the ] ({{bibleverse||Numbers|25:1-18|HE}}).<ref>Walvoord, John F., ''The Bible Knowledge Commentary: Old Testament'', David C. Cook, 1985, pp 250-251</ref> | |||
Another justification is that the Canaanites were sinful, depraved people, and their deaths were punishments ({{bibleverse||Deut|9:5|HE}}). Another justification for the exterminations is to make room for the returning Israelites, who are entitled to exclusive occupation of the land of Canaan: the Canaanite nations were living in the land of Israel, but when the Israelites returned, the Canaanites were expected to leave the land.<ref>Van Wees, p 241-242</ref> | |||
In Talmudic commentary, the Canaanite nations were given the opportunity to leave, and their refusal to leave "lay the onus of blame for the conquest and Joshua's extirpation of the Canaanites at the feet of the victims."<ref> | |||
*See {{bibleverse||Joshua|11:19-20|HE}} | |||
*Ehrlich, p 119-120: "At least some of the Rabbis asked themselves … what had they done to deserve this punishment?.. In essence, the solution was to lay the onus of blame for the conquest and Joshua's extirpation of the Canaanites at the feet of the victims. .. In this manner this midrash makes the Canaanites responsible for their own demise. They were not innocent victims, but elected of their own free will to attempt to contravene the divine promise of land to Israel. The conscience of Joshua, and of his descendants, was clean…."</ref> Another explanation of the exterminations is that God gave the land to the Canaanites only temporarily, until the Israelites would arrive, and the Canaanites extermination was punishment for their refusal to obey God's desire that they leave.<ref>Ehrlich, p 120: "The Canaanites were given the land of Israel to care for until the time .. the Israelites .. would arrive…. Joshua and the Israelites were forced against their will to wage war upon the Canaanites, who, contravening God, would not even cede an inch of land without a fight to the finish. This midrash also attempts to justify the fury and brutality of Joshua's holy war against the Canaanites….</ref> Another Talmudic explanation - for the wars in the ] - was that God initiated the wars as a diversionary tactic so Israelites would not kill Joshua after discovering that Joshua had forgotten certain laws.<ref>Ehrlich, p 120: "That not all Rabbis shared these feelings of ethical ambivalence about their ancestor's alleged genocidal war against the Canaanites is indicated by another midrash … the Israelites were so outraged at his lack of learning that they wanted to kill him. Since there was no time to reteach him all that he had forgotten, the only way in which God could save Joshua was by diverting the attention of the people through a war. Thus the war of extermination against the Canaanites was begun earlier than planned as a diversionary tactic to save the life of one individual. It would appear that the author of this midrash was not all too concerned about the ethical implications of a God who sees nothing wrong with wiping out a whole nation just to save the life of a man whose life is threatened … "</ref> | |||
Some scholars trace the extermination of the Midianites to revenge for the fact that Midianites were responsible for selling ] into slavery in Egypt ({{bibleverse||Genesis|37:28-36|HE}}).<ref>Magid, Shaul, "Subversion as Return: Scripture, Dissent, and Renewal in Contemporary Judaism, in ''Subverting Scriptures: Critical Reflections on the Use of the Bible'' Beth Hawkins Benedix (Ed), p 234: | |||
:"The rabbinic tradition connects the commandment to destroy Midian in Numbers 31 to Genesis 37:28-36, … (Midianites sold Joseph into Egyptian slavery) "Meanwhile, the Midianites sold Joseph in Egypt to Potiphar, one of Pharaoh's officials, the captain of the guard." | |||
</ref> | |||
====Association with violent attitudes in the modern era==== | |||
Some analysts have associated the biblical commandments of extermination with violent attitudes in modern era. | |||
According to ], leaders of the now defunct<ref>Encyclopaedia Judaica: Volume 8, p. 145</ref> Jewish fundamentalist movement ], such as ], consider the Palestinians to be like Canaanites or Amalekites, and suggest that infers a duty to make merciless war against Arabs who reject Jewish sovereignty.<ref>Lustick, Ian, ''For the land and the Lord: Jewish fundamentalism in Israel'', Council on Foreign Relations, 1988. | |||
: Lustick, p 3: "The fear and uncertainty that this demographic shift is generating within the Jewish population as a whole make more attractive fundamentalist appeals to use Joshua's destruction and subjugation of the Canaanites as a model for solving the contemporary 'Arab problem'…. " | |||
: Lustick: p 78:" The image of Palestinians as doomed and suicidal in their opposition to Jewish rule in the Land of Israel corresponds to a more fundamental categorization of them. Gush rabbis and ideologues regularly refer to the local Arabs as 'Canaanites' … Thus Rav Tzvi Yehuda cited Maimonides to the effect that Canaanites had three choices - to flee, to accept Jewish rule, or to fight. These are the choices both suggest, that frame the appropriate attitude for Jews to take towards Palestinian Arabs. Of course, the decision by most Canaanites to fight ensured their destruction. The same fate awaits present-day non-Jewish inhabitants of the land who choose to resist the establishment of Jewish sovereignty over its entirety…. Humane treatment is appropriate, Porat emphasizes 'only for those Arabs ready to accept the sovereignty of the people of Israel'. From this general principle he infers a duty to make merciless war against Arabs in the Land of Israel who reject Jewish sovereignty and the specific requirement to deport the families of Arab juveniles who throw stones at the passing automobiles of Jewish settlers." | |||
:Lustick: p 131: "No evidence exists of concrete plans to carry out genocidal policies towards the 'Arabs of the Land of Israel'. Nevertheless, analysis of the range of disagreement within the Jewish fundamentalist movement over the Arab question must begin with the fact that a number of rabbis supportive of Gush Emunim have offered opinions that could provide the halachic basis for such policies. The substance of these opinions pertains to the identification of the Palestinian Arabs, or Arabs in general, as Amalekites. According to the biblical account, the Amalekites harassed the Israelites … As a consequence, God commanded the Jewish people not only to kill all Amalekites - men, women, and children - but to 'blot out the memory of Amalek' from the face of the earth. Traditionally, great enemies of the Jews, such as Haman in ancient Persia … and Torquemada during the Spanish Inquisition, have been identified as descendants of Amalek. Accordingly, the most extreme views within Gush Emunim on the Arab question, views quoted extensively by Israeli critics of the movement, speak of Arabs as descendants of the Amalekites… A Gush veteran, Haim Tsuria, defended : 'In every generation there is an Amalek. In our generation, our Amalek are the Arabs who oppose the renewal of our national existence in the land of our fathers." | |||
</ref> In 2009, Porat has condemned violence against Palestinians.<ref></ref> Atheist commentator ] discusses the association of the "obliterated" tribes with modern troubles in Palestine.<ref>], ''God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything'', Random House, Inc., 2007, p 101</ref> | |||
] asserts that European colonialism in the 19th century was ideologically based on the biblical narratives of conquest and extermination. He also states that European Jews who migrated to Palestine relied on the biblical ideology of conquest and extermination, and considered the Arabs to be Canaanites.<ref>], ''The Old Testament between theology and history: a critical survey'', Westminster John Knox Press, 2008, | |||
pp 315–316: | |||
:"The story of the 'morally supreme people' that defeats and exterminates another, inferior, nation was part of the ideological baggage of European imperialists and colonizers throughout the nineteenth century. It was also carried by European Jews who,... migrated to Palestine to inherit their ancestral country … In this modern version of the biblical narrative, the Palestinian population turned into 'Canaanites', supposed to be morally inferior to the Jews, and of course the Arabs were never considered their equals … The Bible was the instrument used to suppress the enemy".</ref> Scholar Arthur Grenke claims that the view of war expressed in Deuteronomy contributed to the destruction of Native Americans and to the destruction of European Jewry.<ref>Grenke, Arthur, ''God, greed, and genocide: the Holocaust through the centuries'', New Academia Publishing, LLC, 2005, pp 17-18: | |||
:"Discussing the influence of Christian beliefs on the destruction of the Native peoples in the Americas, Stannard argues that while the New Testament view of war is ambiguous, there is little such ambiguity in the Old Testament. He points to sections in Deuteronomy in which the Israelite God, Yahweh, commanded that the Israelites utterly destroy idolaters whose land they sought to reserve for the worship of their deity (Deut 7:2, 16, and 20:16-17). … According to Stannard, this view of war contributed to the .. destruction of the Native peoples in the Americas. It was this view that also led to the destruction of European Jewry. Accordingly, it is important to look at this particular segment of the Old Testament: it not only describes a situation where a group undertakes to totally destroy other groups, but it also had a major influence on shaping thought and belief systems that permitted, and even inspired, genocide."</ref> | |||
] writes that the "genocide" of the extermination commandments has been "kept before subsequent generations" and served as inspirational examples of divine support for slaughtering enemies.<ref> | |||
*], ''The Bible and Zionism: invented traditions, archaeology and post-colonialism in Palestine-Israel, Volume 1'', Zed Books, 2007, pp 273-276: | |||
:" Prior revisits the old ground … First, the biblical narrative, with its 'divine promise' was inherently linked with the mandate to ethnically cleanse or exterminate the indigenous people … third, in the narrative of the Book of Deuteronomy the divine command to commit 'genocide' is explicit. Fourth, genocide and mass slaughter follow in the Book of Joshua. These highly dubious traditions of the Bible have been kept before subsequent generations of Jews and Christians in their prayers…. The historical evidence, however, strongly suggests that such genocidal massacres never actually took place, although these racist, xenophobic and militaristic narratives remained for later generations as powerful examples of divine aid in battle and of a divine command for widespread slaughter of an enemy…. , while sharing Prior's critique of the perverse use that Zionism and the State of Israel have made of the Bible to support their 'ethnic cleansing' policies in Palestine, … Prior … found incitement to war and violence in the very foundation documents of Judaism, Christianity and islam. In the Hebrew Bible, for instance, there is a dominant strand that sees God as ethnocentric and militaristic. Furthermore, in their conquest of Canaan, the Israelites are commanded by Yahweh to destroy the indigenous inhabitants of Palestine. Later in the days of the Israelite kingdoms, they are urged to show no pity, but to massacre their enemies…. Today, both Christian Zionists in the West and Israeli messianics continue to refer to the Hebrew Scriptures for archetypal conflicts, which guide their attitudes towards the indigenous inhabitants of Palestine: the Palestinian Muslims and Christians." | |||
*Masalha refers to: Prior, Michael P. ''The Bible and colonialism: a moral critique'', Sheffield Academic Press, 1997. | |||
</ref> Ra'anan Boustan, Alex Jassen, and Calvin Roetzel assert that, like other groups have done to their enemies, militant Zionists have identified modern Palestinians with Canaanites, and hence as targets of violence mandated in Deut 20:15-18.<ref>Boustan, Jassen, and Roetzel, "Introduction: Violence, Scripture, and Textual Practice in Early Judaism and Christianity," 4-5: "Later readers of the Bible dramatically transformed this divine directive through hermeneutic alignment of the Canaanites with the current detested 'other.' Thus the Canaanites have been identified with the Irish Catholics | |||
(by Oliver Cromwell), Native Americans (by the New England Puritans), Palestinians (by militant Zionists), and scores of other 'enemies' of Israel. In doing so, the violence perpetrated against these groups is not only justified, but indeed, part and parcel of the original divine plan. The violent legacy of the Bible is a product of both its own violent narrative and the hermeneutics of violence applied to it".</ref> Scholar Leonard B. Glick states that Jewish fundamentalists in Israel, such as ], consider the Palestinians to be like biblical Canaanites, and that some fundamentalist leaders suggest that they "must be prepared to destroy" the Palestinians if the Palestinians do not leave the land.<ref>Glick, Leonard B., "Religion and Genocide", in ''The Widening circle of genocide'', Alan L. Berger (Ed). Transaction Publishers, 1994, p 46: | |||
:" looked with favor on what we may fairly call their proto-genocidal destructiveness. The Book of Joshua provides us with one of the earliest texts in which a deity quite plainly promotes the destruction of a people. As the Hebrews, under Joshua's leadership, undertake the conquest of Canaan, they massacre everyone who stands in their way…. It is instructive (and distressing) to note that contemporary Jewish ultra-nationalists in Israel root their politics in the Book of Joshua and equate their territorial aspirations with the will of God. Here, for example, is ], a prominent theorist of the Gush Emunim … movement: 'from the point of view of mankind's humanistic morality we were in the wrong in (taking the land) from the Canaanites. There is only one catch. The command of God ordered us to be the people of the land of Israel'. Others have identified the Palestinians as 'Canaanites' who are engaged in a 'suicidal' struggle opposing God's own intentions; hence the Jewish people must be prepared to destroy them if they persist in pursuing their collective 'death-wish'."</ref> Scholar Keith Whitelam asserts that the Zionist movement has drawn inspiration from the biblical conquest tradition, and Whitelam draws parallels between the "genocidal Israelites" of Joshua and modern Zionists.<ref> | |||
*Whitelam, Keith W., ''The invention of ancient Israel: the silencing of Palestinian history'', Routledge, 1996, especially pp 71–121. | |||
*Whitelam cited by Ehrlich, pp 117: | |||
:"Keith Whitelam (1996) has published a book in which he has implied that the modern European imperialist Zionist Jewish movement has drawn inspiration from the biblical conquest tradition … Parallels are thus drawn in Whitelam's thought between the genocidal Israelites presumably of Joshua's day and the racist Zionists of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and also between the ancient Canaanites and the modern Palestinians … the interpretations attributed to of the place of the book of Joshua and its … genocidal account of Israel's emergence in the land that it claims as its own pose a challenge to Judaism…. It thus behooves us to ask … how has the Jewish community dealt with these foundational narratives, saturated as they are with acts of violence against others?…."</ref> | |||
===Commandment to exterminate the Amalekites=== | |||
]]] | |||
{{See also|Amalekites}} | |||
The Jewish Bible contains a ] (commandment) to exterminate the Amalekites, based on the verse 1 Samuel 15 "Now, go and crush Amalek; put him under the curse of destruction with all that he possesses. Do not spare him, but kill man and woman, babe and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and donkey." Some commentators, including ], have discussed the ethics of the commandment to exterminate all the Amalekites, including the command to kill all the women and children, and the notion of collective punishment.<ref> | |||
*''Divine command ethics: Jewish and Christian perspectives'', Michael J. Harris, pp 137-138 | |||
*''The Bible's Top Fifty Ideas: The Essential Concepts Everyone Should Know'', Dov Peretz Elkins, Abigail Treu, pp 315 - 316 | |||
*''The ethics of war: shared problems in different traditions'', Richard Sorabji, David Rodin, p 98 | |||
*''Theory and practice in Old Testament ethics'', John William Rogerson, M. Daniel Carroll R., p 92 | |||
</ref> Maimonides explains that the commandment of killing out the nation of Amalek requires the Jewish people to peacefully request of them to accept upon themselves the ] and pay a tax to the Jewish kingdom. Only if they refuse is the commandment applicable. Some commentators, such as Rabbi ] (1788–1869) argued that Jews had lost the tradition of distinguishing Amalekites from other people, and therefore the commandment of killing them could not practically be applied.<ref>Eynei Kol Ḥai, 73, on Sanhedrin 96b</ref> Rabbis nullified the Torah’s commands to kill idolatrous people, by ruling that the Canaanite peoples no longer existed, that the Assyrians, not Israelites, had wiped them out – and therefore the command was a dead letter.<ref name="sword">Sword and Plowshare as Tools of Tikkun Olam: Violence & Nonviolence in Jewish Thought & Action, By Rabbi Arthur Waskow, 10/2/2007</ref> In addition, the ] asserts that today "since Sancheriv mixed up the nations, there is no nation that is identified as Amalek."<ref></ref> | |||
In later ] tradition, the Amalekites came to represent the metaphorical enemy of the Jews. ], Elliot Horowitz and Josef Stern suggest that Amalekites have come to represent an "eternally irreconcilable enemy" that wants to murder Jews, and that Jews In post-biblical times sometimes associate contemporary enemies with Haman or Amalekites, and that some Jews believe that pre-emptive violence is acceptable against such enemies.<ref> | |||
*Masalha, Nur, ''Imperial Israel and the Palestinians: the politics of expansion'', Pluto Press, 2000, pp 129-131. | |||
*Stern, Josef, "Maimonides on Amalek, Self-Corrective Mechanisms, and the War against Idolatry" in ''Judaism and modernity: the religious philosophy of David Hartman'', David Hartman, Jonathan W. Malino (Eds), Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2004 page 360-362 | |||
:"The example concerns the set of biblical commandments … centered on Amalek, the ancient nation that ambushed Israel during the Exodus from Egypt… What does it mean to 'blot out the name of Amalek'? We have evidence of what this meant for biblical Israel … where the commandment is taken literally to mean: destroy by actually killing every Amalekite, man, woman, and child…. Some rabbis allegorize Amalek, taking it as a eupemism for the evil inclination; others have it symbolize the enemies of Israel throughout history; yet others make it the personification of evil…. There are also more specific historital identifications of the people of Amalek. It is well known that in medieval rabbinic literature Esau, and his land Edom, are typologically identified with Rome and, in turn, with Christianity. It is less widely known that Amalek … also came to be conflated with his ancestor and identified with Rome and then Christianity. By the early medieval period, the descendants of the ancient nation of Amalek were identified by some Jewish authors as the Armenians…. Jewish authors could put a biblical face on this overarching foe by identifying it with Amalek and find hope for ultimate victory in the biblical promise that 'God is at war with Amalek from generation to generation' (Ex. 17:16)." | |||
*Hunter, Alastair G. "Denominating Amalek: Racist stereotyping in the Bible and the Justification of Discrimination" in ''Sanctified aggression: legacies of biblical and post biblical vocabularies'', Jonneke Bekkenkamp, Yvonne Sherwood (Eds), Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003, page 99-105. | |||
:"The Amalekites could well be regarded as the archetypal vicitims in the Pentateuch, in that divine instructions to dispose of this people are given on more than one occasion… They also symbolize a further classic device: the rhetorical move … of portraying the victim as aggressor in order to justify his/her elimination…. For most Jews .. .the denunciation of Haman the enemy is part of the light-hearted celebration of a rather 'laid back' festival. But there are more sinister implications which have in recent years emerged on the political scene …. In the early 1900s Rabbi Hayim Soloveitchik of Brisk argued that … there was a possibility of contemporary war against Amalek … Rabbi Yosef Dov Soloveitchik used this position in the early 1940s to contend that the Allied war against Nazi Germany could be understood in Jewish law as a war against Amalek… a couple of 'position pieces' draw disturbing parallels between the suicide plots and the enemy Amalek. The first is .. written by Rabbi Ralph Tawil, in which the writer … comes perilously close to equating President George Bush's war against terrorism with Israel's command to eradicate their troublesome enemy."</ref> ] and other scholars describe several associations of modern ] with Amalekites, including recommendations by rabbi ] to kill Palestinians, which are based on biblical verses such as 1 Samuel 15.<ref> | |||
*Masalha, Nur, ''Imperial Israel and the Palestinians: the politics of expansion'', Pluto Press, 2000, pp 129-131. | |||
:"Frequently Jewish fundamentalists refer to the Palestinians as the 'Amalekites' … of today… According to the Old Testament, the Amalek … were regarded as the Israelites' inveterate foe, whose 'annihilation' became a sacred duty and against whom war should be waged until their 'memory be blotted out' forever (Ex 17:16; Deut 25:17-19)…. Some of the political messianics insist on giving the biblical commandment to 'blot out the memory of the Amalek' an actual contemporary relevance in the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians. In February 1980, Rabbi ] … published an article 'The Genocide Commandment in the Torah' … which ends with the following: 'The day is not far when we shall all be called to this holy war, this commandment of the annihilation of the Amalek'. Hess quotes the biblical commandment … 'Do not spare him, but kill man and woman, baby and suckling, ox and sheep, camel, and donkey'…. In his book ''On the Lord's Side'' Danny Ribinstein has shown that this notion permeates the Gush Emunim movement's bulletins carried an article … which reads 'In every generation there is an Amalek. The Amalekism of our generation finds expression in the deep Arab hatred towards our national revival …'… Professor Uriel Tal … conducted his study in the early 1980s … and pointed out that the totalitarian political messianic stream refers to the Palestinian Arabs in three stages or degrees: … (3) the implementation of the commandment of Amalek, as expressed in Rabbi Hess's article 'The Commandment of Genocide in the Torah', in other words 'annihilating' the Palesinian Arabs'". | |||
*See also Hunter, p 103 | |||
*Also describing Palestinians as targets of violence due to association with Amalek is: Geaves, Ron, ''Islam and the West post 9/11'', Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2004, p 30</ref> | |||
===Modern warfare=== | |||
The permissibility to wage war is limited and the requirement is that one always seek a just peace before waging war.<ref name="Broyde"/> | |||
Some commentators claim that religious leaders have interpreted Jewish religious laws to support killing of innocent civilians during wartime in some circumstances, and that this interpretation was asserted several times: in 1974 following the ], | |||
<ref> | |||
*Rabbi Shim'on Weiser, "Purity of weapons - an exchange of letters" in ''Niv" Hammidrashiyyah Yearbook of Midrashiyyat No'am'', 1974, pp.29-31. | |||
quoted in {{Cite book | |||
|title=The Bible and Zionism: invented traditions, archaeology and post-colonialism in Palestine-Israel | |||
|first=Nur | |||
|last=Masalha | |||
|publisher= Zed Books | |||
|year= 2007 | |||
|ISBN= 1842777610 | |||
|page=158 | |||
}}. This book quotes ], ''From Herzl to Gush Emunim and Back'' (1980), p. 124. | |||
</ref> in 2004, during conflicts in ] and ],<ref>"ADL Strongly Condemns Declaration of Rabbis" - ADL press release, dated Sept 9, 2004; http://www.adl.org/PresRele/IslME_62/4561_62.htm</ref> and in the ].<ref>Rebecca Spence " Rabbis: Israel Too Worried Over Civilian Deaths", in '']'', issue of August 25, 2006. http://www.forward.com/articles/1438/ | |||
</ref> However, major and mainstream religious leaders have condemned this interpretation, and the Israeli military subscribes to the ] doctrine, which seeks to minimize injuries to non-combatants; furthermore, the advice was only applicable to combat operations in wartime. | |||
Activist ] claims that leaders of Judaism in Israel play a role in sanctioning military operations: " gave their endorsement to the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, declaring that it conformed to the Halachi (religious) law and that participation in the war 'in all its aspects' is a religious duty. The military Rabbinate meanwhile distributed a document to soldiers containing a map of Lebanon with the names of cities replaced by alleged Hebrew names taken from the Bible.... A military Rabbi in Lebanon explained the biblical sources that justify 'our being here and our opening the war; we do our Jewish religious duty by being here.'"<ref>{{Cite book | |||
|title=Fateful triangle: the United States, Israel, and the Palestinians (2nd Ed, revised) | |||
|first=Noam | |||
|last=Chomsky | |||
|publisher= South End Press | |||
|year= 1999 | |||
|ISBN= 0896086011 | |||
|pages=153–154 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
William Horbury has written that "The evidence is best explained by postulating that an existing small Jewish population in Lower Galilee was massively expanded by the forced conversion in c. 104 BCE of their Gentile neighbours in the north."<ref>William Horbury. ''The Cambridge History of Judaism 2 Part Set: Volume 3, The Early Roman Period'' Cambridge University Press, 1999: p. 599.</ref> | |||
In 2007, ], the former ] ] of Israel wrote that "there was absolutely no moral prohibition against the indiscriminate killing of civilians during a potential massive military offensive on Gaza aimed at stopping the rocket launchings".<ref name="jpost.com"></ref> His son, ] chief rabbi of ], called for the "carpet bombing" of the general area from which the Kassams were launched, to stop rocket attacks on Israel, saying "This is a message to all leaders of the Jewish people not to be compassionate with those who shoot at civilians in their houses." he continued, "If they don't stop after we kill 100, then we must kill 1,000. And if they don't stop after 1,000, then we must kill 10,000. If they still don't stop we must kill 100,000. Even a million. Whatever it takes to make them stop."<ref name="jpost.com"/> | |||
=== Kingdom of Himyar === | |||
An influential ] ] ] rabbi ] in 2009 was quoted as saying: "I don’t believe in western morality, i.e. don’t kill civilians or children, don’t destroy holy sites, don’t fight during holiday seasons, don’t bomb cemeteries, don’t shoot until they shoot first because it is immoral. The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: Destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women and children".<ref>Popper, Nathaniel, "Chabad rabbi: Jews should kill Arab men, women and children during war", in ''Haaretz'', 9 June 2009 </ref> Later, Friedman explained: "the sub-question I chose to address instead is: how should we act in time of war, when our neighbors attack us, using their women, children and religious holy places as shields."<ref></ref> | |||
{{See also|Himyarite_Kingdom#Jewish_monarchy}} | |||
After the conversion of the ] in the late 4th century to Judaism,{{sfn|Bowersock|2013|p=83}} two episodes of "coercion and brutality" by Himyar Jewish kings took place during the fifth and early sixth centuries.{{sfn|Bowersock|2013|p=85}} In an early example of ], thirty-nine Christians were martyred in the third quarter of the fifth century,{{sfn|Bowersock|2013|p=85}} and a massacre of Christians took place in 523.{{sfn|Bowersock|2013|p=85}} The Yemeni Jewish Himyar tribe, led by King Dhu Nuwashad, offered Christian residents of a village in ] the choice between conversion to Judaism or death, and 20,000 Christians were massacred.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/historians-back-bbc-over-jewish-massacre-claim |title=Historians back BBC over Jewish massacre claim |work=The Jewish Chronicle |date=2009-09-18 |access-date=2014-06-06}}</ref> Inscriptions show the great pride he expressed after massacring more than 22,000 Christians in ] and ].<ref>Jacques Ryckmans, La persécution des chrétiens himyarites au sixième siècle Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Inst. in het Nabije Oosten, 1956 pp. 1–24.</ref> | |||
==Retribution and punishment== | |||
== Retribution and punishments == | |||
===Eye for an eye=== | |||
{{main|Eye for an eye}} | |||
=== An eye for an eye === | |||
George Robinson characterizes the passage of Exodus that contains the principle of ''lex talionis'' (]) as one of the "most controversial in the Bible." According to Robinson, some have pointed to this passage as evidence of the vengeful nature of justice in the Hebrew Bible.<ref>{{cite book |title=Essential Judaism: a complete guide to beliefs, customs and rituals |first=George |last=Robinson |publisher=Simon and Schuster |year=2001}}</ref> Similarly, Abraham Bloch asserts that the "lex talionis has been singled out as a classical example of biblical harshness."<ref>{{cite book |title=A book of Jewish ethical concepts: biblical and postbiblical |first=Abraham P. |last=Bloch |publisher=KTAV Publishing House, Inc. |year=1984}}</ref> | |||
{{Main|eye for an eye}} | |||
While the principle of ''lex talionis'' (]) is clearly echoed in the Bible, in Judaism it is not literally applied, and was interpreted to provide a basis for financial compensation for injuries.<ref>{{cite book |title=Liberal Judaism and social service |first=Harry Samuel |last=Lewis |publisher=Bloch Pub. Co. |year=1915 |page= |url=https://archive.org/details/liberaljudaisma00lewigoog|quote=Judaism lex talionis. }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Biblical interpretation in Judaism and Christianity |first1=Isaac |last1=Kalimi |first2=Peter J. |last2=Haas|author2-link=Peter Haas (rabbi) |publisher=Continuum International Publishing Group |year=2006 |page=2 |isbn=978-0-567-02682-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=h6bSc6ksh0YC&q=Judaism+%22lex+talionis%22&pg=PA2}}</ref> Pasachoff and Littman point to the reinterpretation of the ''lex talionis'' as an example of the ability of ] Judaism to "adapt to changing social and intellectual ideas."<ref>{{cite book |title=A concise history of the Jewish people |first1=Naomi E. |last1=Pasachoff |first2=Robert J. |last2=Littman |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |year=2005 |page=64 |isbn=978-0-7425-4366-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z4eaj09hscAC&q=Judaism+%22lex+talionis%22&pg=PA64}}</ref> Stephen Wylen asserts that the ''lex talionis'' is "proof of the unique value of each individual" and that it teaches "equality of all human beings for law."<ref>{{cite book |title=The seventy faces of Torah: the Jewish way of reading the Sacred Scriptures |first=Stephen M. |last=Wylen |publisher=Paulist Press |year=2005 |page=20 |isbn=978-0-8091-4179-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0EqnRc4FF30C&q=Judaism+%22lex+talionis%22&pg=PA20}}</ref> | |||
===Capital and corporal punishment=== | === Capital and corporal punishment === | ||
{{Main|Capital and corporal punishment (Judaism)}} | {{Main|Capital and corporal punishment (Judaism)}} | ||
While the Bible and ] specify many violent punishments, including death by stoning, decapitation, burning, and strangulation for some crimes,<ref> | |||
*Sanhedrin 11:1 specifies strangulation | *Sanhedrin 11:1 specifies strangulation | ||
*Neusner, Jacob, ''Comparing religions through law: Judaism and Islam'', pp. 107–111</ref> these punishments were substantially modified during the ] era, primarily by adding additional requirements for conviction.<ref name="Goldstein(Rabbi.)2006"/> The ] states that a ] that executes one person in seven years – or seventy years, according to ] – is considered bloodthirsty.<ref name=judaica-rabinowitz>{{cite encyclopedia|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia Judaica|url=http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/capital-punishment|author=Louis Isaac Rabinowitz|title=Capital Punishment. In Practice in the Talmud|year=2008|publisher=The Gale Group|quote=Similarly, the passage in Mishnah Makkot 1:10: "A Sanhedrin that puts a man to death once in seven years is called a murderous one. R. Eleazar ben Azariah says 'Or even once in 70 years.' R. Tarfon and R. Akiva said, 'If we had been in the Sanhedrin no death sentence would ever have been passed'; Rabban Simeon b. Gamaliel said: 'If so, they would have multiplied murderers in Israel.'}}</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia Judaica|url=http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/capital-punishment|author=Menachem Elon|title=Capital Punishment. In the State of Israel|year=2008|publisher=The Gale Group|quote=This refers to the statement in the Mishnah (Mak. 1:10; Mak. 7a) that a Sanhedrin that kills (gives the death penalty) once in seven years (R. Eleazer b. Azariah said: once in 70 years) is called "bloody" (ḥovlanit, the term "ḥovel" generally implying a type of injury in which there is blood).}}</ref> During the ], the tendency of not applying the death penalty at all became predominant in Jewish courts.<ref>{{cite book|title=Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World|url=https://archive.org/details/lateantiquitygui00bowe|url-access=registration|page=|author=Glen Warren Bowersock |author2=Peter Brown |author3=Oleg Grabar |publisher=Harvard University Press|year=1999|isbn=978-0-674-51173-6}}</ref> According to Talmudic law, the competence to apply capital punishment ceased with the destruction of the ].<ref name=judaica-cohn>{{cite encyclopedia|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia Judaica|url=http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/capital-punishment|author=Haim Hermann Cohn|title=Capital Punishment. Talmudic Law|year=2008|publisher=The Gale Group}}</ref> In practice, where medieval ] had the power to pass and execute death sentences, they continued to do so for particularly grave offenses, although not necessarily the ones defined by the law.<ref name=judaica-cohn/> Although it was recognized that the use of capital punishment in the post-Second Temple era went beyond the biblical warrant, the Rabbis who supported it believed that it could be justified by other considerations of Jewish law.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Biblical Truth about America's Death Penalty|author=Dale S. Recinella|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QPTwCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA93|page=93|publisher=Northeastern University Press|year=2015|isbn=978-1-55553-862-0}}</ref><ref name=elon/> Whether Jewish communities ever practiced capital punishment according to rabbinical law and whether the Rabbis of the Talmudic era ever supported its use even in theory has been a subject of historical and ideological debate.<ref>{{cite book|author=Jacobs, Jill|title=There Shall Be No Needy: Pursuing Social Justice Through Jewish Law & Tradition|publisher=Woodstock, Vt: Jewish Lights|year=2009|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=paFDnh1OvK0C&pg=PA200|page=200|isbn=978-1-58023-425-2}}</ref> The 12th-century Jewish legal scholar ] stated that "It is better and more satisfactory to acquit a thousand guilty persons than to put a single innocent one to death."<ref name="Goldstein(Rabbi.)2006">{{cite book | |||
*Neusner, Jacob, ''Comparing religions through law: Judaism and Islam'', | |||
page 107-111 | |||
:"The earthly court enjoys full power to dispose of the property and life of all subject to its authority - in the contex imagined by Rabbinic Judaism, of all residing in territory that comes under the state's control. Imposing the death penalty is described in the following way: …stoning, burning, decapitation, and strangulation…. : (a) The religious requirement of decapitation : … (g) the religious requirement of strangulation … First come the death penalty on earth and its counterpart, which is extirpation (death before one's allotted time) imposed by heaven. "Heaven" refers to the heavenly court. incest, violating sex taboos (bestiality, homosexuality), blasphemy, idolatry, magic, sorcery, profaning Sabbath,… That is, the heavenly court and the earthly court impose precisely the same sanctions for the same crimes or sins. The earthly court therefore forms down here the exact replica and counterpart, within a single system of power, of the heavenly court up there." | |||
*Holmes, Barbara, "Sex, Stones, and Power Games" in ''Pregnant passion: BRILL, 2004, Holmes p 161 | |||
*Costanzo, Mark, ''Just Revenge: Costs and Consequences of the Death Penalty'', Macmillan, 1997, page 130 | |||
* Rogerson , John William, ''Theory and practice in Old Testament ethics'', Continuum International Publishing Group, 2004, p 15 | |||
*Seland, Torrey, ''Establishment violence in Philo and Luke: a study of non-conformity to the Torah and Jewish vigilante reactions'', BRILL, 1995, pp 120-123 (a good overview of all the punishments, and which is in Tanakah, and which is in Tlamud) | |||
</ref> Violent punishments by death are referred to in several of Judaism's ].<ref>Commandments that refer to violent punishments include: | |||
*The courts must carry out the death penalty of stoning, Deut. 22:24 | |||
*The courts must carry out the death penalty of burning, Lev. 20:14 | |||
*The courts must carry out the death penalty of the sword, Ex. 21:20 | |||
*The courts must carry out the death penalty of strangulation, Lev. 20:10 | |||
*The courts must hang those stoned for blasphemy or idolatry, Deut. 21:22 | |||
*The court must not let the sorcerer live, Ex. 22:17 | |||
*The court must give lashes to the wrongdoer, Deut. 25:2 | |||
</ref> The transgressions that call for violent punishment by death in Judaism include the following: cursing one's parents,<ref> | |||
*Lev 20:9, "If anyone curses his father or mother, he must be put to death." | |||
*Milgrom, Jacob, ''Leviticus: a book of ritual and ethics : a continental commentary'', Fortress Press, 2004 p 255</ref> fornication (sex outside of marriage),<ref> | |||
*Deut 22:20-21,: "If, however, the charge is true and no proof of the girl's virginity can be found, she shall be brought to the door of her father's house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death. She has done a disgraceful thing in Israel by being promiscuous while still in her father's house. You must purge the evil from among you." | |||
*Deut 22:23-24: "If a man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps with her, 24 you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death—the girl because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the man because he violated another man's wife. You must purge the evil from among you." | |||
*However, victims of rape were not subject to punishment | |||
* Rofé, Alexander, ''Deuteronomy: issues and interpretation'', Continuum International Publishing Group, 2002, pp 172-178 | |||
* ], ''Runions, Erin, "Violence and the Economy of Desire", in ''The feminist companion to the Bible, Volume 2'' Continuum International Publishing Group, 1998, p 156 | |||
*Holmes, Barbara, "Sex, Stones, and Power Games" in ''Pregnant passion: gender, sex, and violence in the Bible'', Cheryl A. Kirk-Duggan (Ed.), BRILL, 2004, p 153 | |||
</ref> bestiality,<ref> | |||
*Ex 22:19 - "Anyone who has sexual relations with an animal must be put to death." | |||
*Rosner, Fred, ''Encyclopedia of medicine in the Bible and the Talmud'', Jason Aronson, 2000, p 48 | |||
*Dozeman, Thomas B, ''Exodus'', Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2009, pp 543-544 | |||
</ref> sorcery,<ref> | |||
*Ex 22:18 - "Do not allow a sorceress to live" | |||
*Dozeman, p 544 | |||
*Rosner, p 287-288</ref> taking advantage of widows or orphans,<ref> | |||
*Ex 22:22-24 - "Do not take advantage of a widow or an orphan. 23 If you do and they cry out to me, I will certainly hear their cry. 24 My anger will be aroused, and I will kill you with the sword; your wives will become widows and your children fatherless." | |||
*Dozeman, p 545-546</ref> blasphemy,<ref> | |||
*Lev 24:16 - "anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put to death. The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death." | |||
*Ex 22:28 "Do not blaspheme God or curse the ruler of your people. | |||
*Prohibition against blashpemy is one of Judaism's ] ( based on Ex. 22:27; in Christian texts, Ex. 22:28), the penalty for which is death (Lev. 24:16) (negative). | |||
*Alexander, T. Desmond, ''Dictionary of the Old Testament: Pentateuch'', InterVarsity Press, 2003, p 82 | |||
</ref> stubborn and rebellious son,<ref> | |||
* Deut 21:18:21 - "If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who does not obey his father and mother and will not listen to them when they discipline him, 19 his father and mother shall take hold of him and bring him to the elders at the gate of his town. 20 They shall say to the elders, "This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious. He will not obey us. He is a profligate and a drunkard." 21 Then all the men of his town shall stone him to death. You must purge the evil from among you. All Israel will hear of it and be afraid." | |||
*Drinkwater, Gregg, ''Torah Queeries: Weekly Commentaries on the Hebrew Bible'', NYU Press, 2009, p 254 | |||
</ref> incest,<ref> | |||
*Lev 20:11 - "If a man sleeps with his father's wife, he has dishonored his father. Both the man and the woman must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads." | |||
*Lev 20:12 - "If a man sleeps with his daughter-in-law, both of them must be put to death. What they have done is a perversion; their blood will be on their own heads." | |||
*Leviticus 20:14 - " 'If a man marries both a woman and her mother, it is wicked. Both he and they must be burned in the fire, so that no wickedness will be among you. | |||
*See also Lev 18:7-19 | |||
*Rosner, p 69, 173-174: Punishment for incest is by stoning or burnnig | |||
*Woods, Clyde M., ''Leviticus and Numbers'', College Press, 2006, p 128 | |||
</ref> adultery,<ref> | |||
*Deut 22:22 - "If a man is found sleeping with another man's wife, both the man who slept with her and the woman must die. You must purge the evil from Israel." | |||
*Lev 20:10 - "If a man commits adultery with another man's wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death" | |||
*Rosner: p 14-15: strangulation is specified in Sanhedrin 84b (strangulation is not specified in the Torah) and also in Sanhedtrin 11:1 | |||
</ref> and homosexuality.<ref> | |||
*Lev 20:13 - "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads." | |||
*See also Lev 18:22 - " Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable." | |||
</ref> Whipping is specified as punishment for lesser transgressions.<ref>Deuteronomy 25:1-3 - When men have a dispute, they are to take it to court and the judges will decide the case, acquitting the innocent and condemning the guilty. 2 If the guilty man deserves to be beaten, the judge shall make him lie down and have him flogged in his presence with the number of lashes his crime deserves, 3 but he must not give him more than forty lashes. If he is flogged more than that, your brother will be degraded in your eyes.</ref> | |||
The punishments established in the biblical era were substantially modified during the rabbinic era, primarily by adding additional requirements for conviction. As a consequence, the death penalty was very rarely applied, and it became more of a principle than a practice. The Talmud states that a court that executes one person in seven years is considered bloodthirsty (Makkot 1:10). The 12th-century Jewish legal scholar ] stated that "It is better and more satisfactory to acquit a thousand guilty persons than to put a single innocent one to death."<ref name="Goldstein(Rabbi.)2006">{{cite book | |||
|last=Goldstein | |last=Goldstein | ||
|first=Warren | |first=Warren | ||
| |
|author-link=Warren Goldstein | ||
|title=Defending the human spirit: Jewish law's vision for a moral society | |title=Defending the human spirit: Jewish law's vision for a moral society | ||
|url= |
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uuizffmvKqQC&pg=PA269 | ||
| |
|access-date=22 October 2010 | ||
|year=2006 | |year=2006 | ||
|publisher=Feldheim Publishers | |publisher=Feldheim Publishers | ||
|isbn=978-1-58330-732-8 | |isbn=978-1-58330-732-8 | ||
|page=269}}</ref> The position of Jewish Law on capital punishment often formed the basis of deliberations by ]. It has been carried out by ] only once, in the case of ].<ref name=elon>{{cite encyclopedia|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia Judaica|url=http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/capital-punishment|author=Menachem Elon|title=Capital Punishment. In the State of Israel|year=2008|publisher=The Gale Group}}</ref> | |||
|page=269}}</ref> | |||
==Purim and the Book of Esther== | == Purim and the Book of Esther == | ||
The ], one of the books of the Jewish Bible, is a story of palace intrigue centered on a plot to kill all Jews which was thwarted by Esther, a Jewish queen of Persia. Instead of being victims, the Jews killed "all the people who wanted to kill them."<ref></ref> The king gave the Jews the ability to defend themselves against their enemies who tried to kill them,<ref></ref> numbering 75,000 (Esther 9:16) including ], an ] that led the plot to kill the Jews. The annual ] festival celebrates this event, and includes the recitation of the biblical instruction to "blot out the remembrance of Amalek". Scholars – including ], ], and Steven Bayme – state that the violence described in the ] has inspired and incited violent acts and violent attitudes in the post-biblical era, continuing into modern times, often centered on the festival of ].<ref name="Horowitz 2006"/>{{rp|2–19, 107–146, 187–212, 213–247}}<ref>], ''For the land and the Lord: Jewish fundamentalism in Israel'', Council on Foreign Relations, 1988. Quote: "Of decisive importance to Jewish fundamentalists is their belief that contemporary political developments are part of an unfolding cosmic drama that will determine, depending on the willingness of Jews to act decisively on its behalf, whether God's redemption of his people Israel, and of the whole world, will or will not soon reach its completion…. The massacre in the Hebron mosque on the Jewish holiday of Purim is a tragic, but telling, example. Preceded by a rash of killings of Jewish settlers by Muslim fundamentalists … it is not in the least a coincidence that the massacre took place on the Jewish holiday of Purim. For most Jews Purim means listening to .. the Book of Esther .. .It is an occasion for merry-making, games, charity and the exchange of gifts. But as Goldstein sat reading that same book on Purim even in 1994, it is almost certain he identified Yasir Arafat with Haman, the arch-enemy of the Jews of ancient Persia, and the killing of Jewish settlers over the previous months with Haman's murderous designs. Accordingly, he focused on often-ignored verses at the end of the book which, for Jewish fundamentalists, capture the essence of the story under contemporary circumstances and contain a divine imperative to act. According to the Book of Esther the Jews are saved by the king who reverses Haman's evil decree and declares instead that Jews may do unto their enemies what their enemies had intended to do unto them 'to stand up for themselves, to destroy, to slay, and to annihilate any armed force of any people or province that might assault them, with their little ones and women' (Esther 8:11) ... By mowing down Arabs he believed wanted to kill Jews, Goldstein was re-enacting part of the Purim story." (pp. ix–xi.)</ref><ref>Quotes from Horowitz 2006, p. 16: "This book deals not only with the theme of Amalek and responses – Christian as well as Jewish – to the book of Esther over the centuries, but also with Jewish violence connected with the holiday of Purim, from the early fifth century to the late twentieth." :p. 19: "The first is devoted ... to the book of Esther … Was it a book that promoted cruel vengeance ...? Since according to Jewish law the Amalekites, including women and children, had to be utterly destroyed, thinking about Amalek involved … thinking about the possibilities of, and justifications for, Jewish violence. one specific form of Jewish violence over many centuries - the descration of the cross and other Christian images…. devoted to violence against Christians, sometimes within the context of the Purim festiviy, in the 5th–7th centuries. Chapter 9 carries the subject of Purim violence into the medieval and early modern Europe, especially against the background of the often violent rites of Carnival."</ref><ref>Bayme, Steven, "Saddam, Haman, and Amalek", in ''Jewish arguments and counterarguments: essays and addresses'', KTAV Publishing House, Inc., 2002: Quote: "For many centuries Purim has been a source of both joy and embarrassment for Jews ... Still others have challenged the doctrine of violence associated with the holiday… Martin Luther, for one, accused the Jews of bloodthirsty and vengeful spirit in the Book of Esther… reflect the close association of Purim with the biblical doctrine of war against the Amalek. The theme of Jewish violence against Haman and his supporters, the doctrine of Amalek, has caused Jews the greatest discomfort with the Book of Esther and the holiday with which it is associated ... Judaism teaches that violence is justified under certain circumstances – particularly defense against aggression ... Amalek, the rabbis argue, is the eternally irreconcilable enemy who represents a value system that promotes murder ... Herein lies the enduring relevance of Purim. Aggression must be stopped and evil eliminated ... The meaning of Purim is relevant to the question of the war in the Persian Gulf today ... unprovoked Scud missile attacks against entirely civilian targets in Israel are reminiscent of Amaleks's treacherous attacks upon the ... Israelites...." (pp. 75–80)</ref><ref>''The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha, Augmented Third Edition'' Michael David Coogan (Ed). Quote:"Jews and Christians have also been troubled by the story's enthusiastic account of the violence of the Jewish community's response to their enemies, which involved not only self defense but also the slaughter of women and children, including the sons of Haman. The bloodthirsty language, however, derives from the story's symmetric pattern of reversals ..." (p. 708)</ref><ref>], ''Between Eden and Armageddon: the future of world religions, violence, and peacemaking'', Oxford University Press US, 2000. Quote : "I have known many Orthodox rabbis, for example, who would be happy to ensure that a holiday such as Purim, with its obligatory reading of the Book of Esther, which cluminates with the slaughter of the people – including their children – who tried to exterminate the Jewish people, would never be used to justify the killing of anyone today. They certainly are deeply ashamed by Baruch Goldstein's mass murder at the Hebron mosque, which was inspired in part by Purim ... They can and do give moralistic sermons, and they can and do interpret the story in less violent terms ... The hermeneutic give and take of Purim is but one example of the way in which a deeply embedded tradition will not disappear even when many people reject its implicit message of violence ... It is not likely in the current climate of religious revivalism, but it is possible that the violence of the story could be overshadowed with time by the numerous benevolent characteristics of the holiday, such as aiding the poor ... Jewish empowerment allows for a new hermeneutic that could centralize the violence of the story. If the political situation were to rapidly deteriorate, it is conceivable that Purim could become for radical Jews what Ramadan has become for radical Muslims in Algeria, a killing season ... Even the most radically pacifist Jews that I know do not eliminate this holiday, although they do not really know what to do with sacralized violence yet, and are now only evolving a spiritual and ritual reworking of traumatic and violent episodes." (pp. 52–53)</ref><ref>Nirenberg, David, ''Communities of violence: persecution of minorities in the Middle Ages'', Princeton University Press, 1998. Quote:"There is evidence … that Jews could use ritual violence to criticize the Christians in whose lands they dwelled An obvious example is Purim, on which see E. Horowitz, ''The Rite to Be Reckless'' ..; and for a late medieval Iberian example, S. Levy, "Notas sobre el 'Purrim de Zaragoza", ''Anuario do Filologia'' 5 (1979): 203–217. (p. 220)</ref><ref>Gonen, Jay Y., ''Yahweh versus Yahweh: the enigma of Jewish history'', Univ of Wisconsin Press, 2005. Quote :"In 1994, on Purim day, Jewish physician Baruch Goldstein burst into an Arab Mosque in Hebron … and sprayed Arab worshipers who were kneeling in prayer with bullets from an automatic weapon. Twenty-nine Palestinians were killed before the enraged crowd tore him to pieces. It was a shameful day in Jewish history, the memory of which should be injected into all future Purim celebrations as a sober reminder of the potential barbarism that is hidden within the old myths of vengeance wrought by the Sons of Israel upon their enemies…. memorial plaque affirmed that 'he was murdered for the sanctification of the Name…'. In this manipulative phrasing the old Jewish ethos of martyrdom, the sanctification of the Name, was given new meaning - messianic, activist, and murderous…. Purim celebrations in Israel in 2001 were again blotted by ugly incidents. As Jewish hotheadedness increased … harassments of Palestinians took place. During Purim it was a mitzvah, or good deed, to sock it to the modern Amalekites… In Jerusalem dozens of Jews gathered in the Sabath Square, pelted cars with stones, tried to set a minibus on fire, and threw various objects at residents of the Arab quarter. In Zion Gate Jews beat up Palestinians, calling them 'dirty Arabs' and 'terrorists'. One drunken Jew who wounded an Arab in the eye subsequently attacked the police as he was arrested. There was no loss of life in these incidents, but this cannot be said about the Baruch Goldstein precedence of violence that was deliberately injected into the Purim ritual. And if it has become a Purim commandment to drink and then attack Arabs, how should the Arabs react?" (pp. 63–64)</ref><ref>Robins, Robert S. and Post, Jerrold M., ''Political paranoia: the psychopolitics of hatred'', Yale University Press, 1997. Quote: "On February 25, 1994, when Dr. Baruch Goldstein walked into the mosque atop the Tomb of the patriarchs in Hebron and fired his automatic weapon into the worshipping Muslims, killing or wounding at least 130 of them … Also on the night before ... Goldstein had read … from the Book of Esther which tells the story of the Jewish festival of Purim ... Purim friend explained 'is a holiday to kill the people who are trying to kill the Jews'" ... For most Jews Purim is a joyous celebration of deliverance. But for some it is a celebration of violence, commemorating an uprising of the Jews against their enemies, a day of righteous wrath when 'the Jews smote all their enemies with the stroke of the sword and with slaughter and destruction, and did what they would unto them that hated them' (Esther 9:1)." (pp. 162–163)</ref><ref>Hunter, Alastair G. "Denominating Amalek: Racist stereotyping in the Bible and the Justification of Discrimination" in ''Sanctified aggression: legacies of biblical and post biblical vocabularies'', Jonneke Bekkenkamp, Yvonne Sherwood (Eds), Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003. Quote: Hunter quotes ] on p. 103: "on hearing of the murderous attack by Baruch Goldstein": "I know at once that this is no isolated crazy, this 'Baruch Goldstein' who has murdered forty of my cousins. I know at once, he has decided on this Purim to 'blot out the memory of the Amalek' not with a noise maker but with a machine gun… So then, in our generation, for some Jews the Palestinians become Amalek."</ref><ref>Boustan, Ra'anan S., ''Violence, Scripture, and Textual Practice in Early Judaism and Christianity'', Brill, 2010. Quote: "... Christians had grown apprehensive at what they perceived, not without reason, as the ill-will that Jews harbored against the Christian Church… Such concerns are already reflected in the legislation passed in 408 CE against the alleged Jewish practice of burning Haman in effigy on 'a form made to resemble the sainted cross' during the festival of Purim, which the authorities suspected was a gesture of ridicule aimed at the Savior himself…. And, indeed, a verse parody in Jewish Aramaic ... which features Jesus Christ amid a host of Israel's enemies ... justifying the punishment of Haman and bewailing their own cruel fates, may suggest that the dim view of Purim taken by Christian authorities was far from baseless." (p. 218)</ref> | |||
The ], one of the books of the Jewish Bible, is a story of palace intrigue centered on a plot to kill all Jews which was thwarted by Esther, a Jewish queen of Persia. Instead of being victims, the Jews killed "all the people who wanted to kill them."<ref></ref> The king gave the Jews the ability to defend themselves against their enemies who tried to kill them.<ref></ref> numbering 75,000 (Esther 9:16) including ], an ] that led the plot to kill the Jews. The annual ] festival celebrates this event, and includes the recitation of the biblical instruction to "blot out the remembrance of Amalek". Scholars - including ], ], and ] - state that the violence described in the ] has inspired and incited violent acts and violent attitudes in the post-biblical era, continuing into modern times, often centered on the festival of ].<ref> | |||
*], ''For the land and the Lord: Jewish fundamentalism in Israel'', Council on Foreign Relations, 1988. pp ix-xi. | |||
:"Of decisive importance to Jewish fundamentalists is their belief that contemporary political developments are part of an unfolding cosmic drama that will determine, depending on the willingness of Jews to act decisively on its behalf, whether God's redemption of his people Israel, and of the whole world, will or will not soon reach its completion…. The massacre in the Hebron mosque on the Jewish holiday of Purim is a tragic, but telling, example. Preceded by a rash of killings of Jewish settlers by Muslim fundamentalists … it is not in the least a conincidence that the massacre took place on the Jewish holiday of Purim. For most Jews Purim means listening to .. the Book of Esther .. .It is an occasion for merry-making, games, charity and the exchange of gifts. But as Goldstein sat reading that same book on Purim even in 1994, it is almost certain he identified Yasir Arafat with Haman, the arch-enemy of the Jews of ancient Persia, and the killing of Jewish settlers over the previous months with Haman's murderous designs. Accordingly, he focused on often-ignored verses at the end of the book which, for Jewish fundamentalists, capture the essence of the story under contemporary circumstances and contain a divine imperative to act. According to the Book of Esther the Jews are saved by the king who reverses Haman's evil decree and declares instead that Jews may do unto their enemies what their enemies had intended to do unto them 'to stand up for themselves, to destroy, to slay, and to annihilate any armed force of any people or province that might assault them, with their little ones and women' (Esther 8:11)….By mowing down Arabs he believed wanted to kill Jews, Goldstein was re-enacting part of the Purim story." | |||
*{{Cite book | |||
|title=Reckless rites: Purim and the legacy of Jewish violence | |||
|first=Elliott S. | |||
|last=Horowitz | |||
|publisher= Princeton University Press | |||
|year= 2006 | |||
|ISBN= 0691124914 | |||
|pages= 2–19, 107–146, 187–212, 213–247 | |||
}} | |||
:page 16: "This book deals not only with the theme of Amalek and responses - Christian as well as Jewish - to the book of Esther over the centuries, but also with Jewish violence connected with the holiday of Purim, from the early fifth century to the late twentieth." | |||
:page 19: "The first is devoted .. to the book of Esther … Was it a book that promoted cruel vengeance…? Since according to Jewish law the Amalekites, including women and children, had to be utterly destroyed, thinking about Amalek involved … thinking about the possibilities of, and justifications for, Jewish violence. one specific form of Jewish violence over many centuries - the descration of the cross and other Christian images…. devoted to violence against Christians, sometimes within the context of the Purim festiviy, in the 5th-7th centuries. Chapter 9 carries the subject of Purim violence into the medieval and early modern Europe, especially against the background of the often violent rites of Carnival." | |||
*], "Saddam, Haman, and Amalek", in ''Jewish arguments and counterarguments: essays and addresses'', KTAV Publishing House, Inc., 2002: pp 75–80: | |||
:"For many centuries Purim has been a source of both joy and embarassment for Jews. … Still others have challenged the doctrine of violence associated with the holiday… Martin Luther, for one, accused the Jews of bloodthirsty and vengeful spirit in the Book of Esther… reflect the close association of Purim with the biblical doctrine of war against the Amalek. The theme of Jewish violence against Haman and his supporters, the doctrine of Amalek, has caused Jews the greatest discomfort with the Book of Esther and the holiday with which it is associated…. Judaism teaches that violence is justified under certain circumstances - particularly defense against aggression … Amalek, the rabbis argue, is the eternally irreconcilable enemy who represents a value system that promotes murder … Herein lies the enduring relevance of Purim. Aggression must be stopped and evil eliminated…. The meaning of Purim is relevant to the question of the war in the Persian Gulf today …. unprovoked Scud missile attacks against entirely civilian targets in Israel are reminiscent of Amaleks's treacherous attacks upon the … Israelites...." | |||
*''The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha, Augmented Third Edition'' Michael David Coogan (Ed), p 708: | |||
:"Jews and Christians have also been troubled by the story's enthusiastic account of the violence of the Jewish community's response to their enemies, which involved not only self defense but also the slaughter of women and children, including the sons of Haman. The bloodthirsty language, however, derives from the story's symmetric pattern of reversals.." | |||
*], ''Between Eden and Armageddon: the future of world religions, violence, and peacemaking'', Oxford University Press US, 2000, pp 52–53: | |||
:"I have known many Orthodox rabbis, for example, who would be happy to ensure that a holiday such as Purim, with its obligatory reading of the Book of Esther, which cluminates with the slaughter of the people - including their children - who tried to exterminate the Jewish people, would never be used to justify the killing of anyone today. They certainly are deeply ashamed by Baruch Goldstein's mass murder at the Hebron mosque, which was inspired in part by Purim…. They can and do give moralistic sermons, and they can and do interpret the story in less violent terms…. The hermeneutic give and take of Purim is but one example of the way in which a deeply embedded tradition will not disappear even when many people reject its implicit message of violence…. It is not likely in the current climate of religious revivalism, but it is possible that the violence of the story could be overshadowed with time by the numerous benevolent characteristics of the holiday, such as aiding the poor…. Jewish empowerment allows for a new hermeneutic that could centralize the violence of the story. If the political situation were to rapidly deteriorate, it is conceivable that Purim could become for radical Jews what Ramadan has become for radical Muslims in Algeria, a killing season…. Even the most radically pacifist Jews that I know do not eliminate this holiday, although they do not really know what to do with sacralized violence yet, and are now only evolving a spiritual and ritual reworking of traumatic and violent episodes." | |||
*Nirenberg, David, ''Communities of violence: persecution of minorities in the Middle Ages'', Princeton University Press, 1998page 220: | |||
:"There is evidence … that Jews could use ritual violence to criticize the Christians in whose lands they dwelled An obvious example is Purim, on which see E. Horowitz, ''The Rite to Be Reckless'' ..; and for a late medieval Iberian example, S. Levy, "Notas sobre el 'Purrim de Zaragoza", ''Anuario do Filologia 5 (1979): 203-217." | |||
*Gonen, Jay Y., ''Yahweh versus Yahweh: the enigma of Jewish history'', Univ of Wisconsin Press, 2005, pp 63–64: | |||
:"In 1994, on Purim day, Jewish physician Baruch Goldstein burst into an Arab Mosque in Hebron … and sprayed Arab worshipers who were kneeling in prayer with bullets from an automatic weapon. Twenty-nine Palestinians were killed before the enraged crowd tore him to pieces. It was a shameful day in Jewish hisotyr, the memory of which should be injected into all future Purim celebrations as a sober reminder of the potential barbarism that is hidden within the old myths of vengeance wrought by the Sons of Israel upon their enemies…. memorial plaque affirmed that 'he was murdered for the sanctification of the Name…'. In this manipulative phrasing the old Jewish ethos of martyrdom, the sanctification of the Name, was given new meaning - messianic, activist, and murderous…. Purim celebrations in Israel in 2001 were again blotted by ugly incidents. As Jewish hotheadedness increased … harassments of Palestinians took place. During Purim it was a mitzvah, or good deed, to sock it to the modern Amalekites… In Jerusalem dozens of Jews gathered in the Sabath Square, pelted cars with stones, tried to set a minibus on fire, and threw various objects at residents of the Arab quarter. In Zion Gate Jews beat up Palestinians, calling them 'dirty Arabs' and 'terrorists'. One drunken Jew who wounded an Arab in the eye subsequently attacked the police as he was arrested. There was no loss of life in these incidents, but this cannot be said about the Baruch Goldstein precedence of violence that was deliberately injected into the Purim ritual. And if it has become a Purim commandment to drink and then attack Arabs, how should the Arabs react?" | |||
*Robins, Robert S. and Post, Jerrold M., ''Political paranoia: the psychopolitics of hatred'', Yale University Press, 1997, pp 162–163: | |||
:"On February 25, 1994, when Dr. Baruch Goldstein walked into the mosque atop the Tomb of the patriarchs in Hebron and fired his automatic weapon into the worshipping Muslims, killing or wounding at least 130 of them … Also on the night before … Goldstein had read … from the Book of Esther which tells the story of the Jewish festival of Purim…. Purim friend explained 'is a holiday to kill the people who are trying to kill the Jews'" … For most Jews Purim is a joyous celebration of deliverance. But for some it is a celebration of violence, commemorating an uprising of the Jews against their enemies, a day of righteous wrath when 'the Jews smote all their enemies with the stroke of the sword and with slaughter and destruction, and did what they would unto them that hated them' (Esther 9:1)." | |||
*Hunter, Alastair G. "Denominating Amalek: Racist stereotyping in the Bible and the Justification of Discrimination" in ''Sanctified aggression: legacies of biblical and post biblical vocabularies'', Jonneke Bekkenkamp, Yvonne Sherwood (Eds), Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003, pp 102–106. | |||
:One illustrative quote from p 103: Hunter quotes ]: "on hearing of the murderous attack by Baruch Goldstein": "I know at once that this is no isolated crazy, this 'Baruch Goldstein' who has murdered forty of my cousins. I know at once, he has decided on this Purim to 'blot out the memory of the Amalek' not with a noise maker but with a machine gun… So then, in our generation, for some Jews the Palestinians become Amalek." | |||
*Boustan, Ra'anan S., ''Violence, Scripture, and Textual Practice in Early Judaism and Christianity'', BRILL, 2010, p. 218 | |||
:"..Christians had grown apprehensive at what they perceived, not without reason, as the ill-will that Jews harbored against the Christian Church… Such concerns are already reflected in the legislation passed in 408 CE against the alleged Jewish practice of burning Haman in effigy on 'a form made to resemble the sainted cross' during the festival of Purim, which the authorities suspected was a gesture of ridicule aimed at the Savior himself…. And, indeed, a verse parody in Jewish Aramaic .. .which features Jesus Christ amid a host of Israel's enemies … justifying the punishment of Haman and bewailing their own cruel fates, may suggest that the dim view of Purim taken by Christian authorities was far from baseless."</ref> | |||
Other scholars, including Jerome Auerbach, state that evidence for Jewish violence on Purim through the centuries is "exceedingly meager", including occasional episodes of stone throwing, the spilling of rancid oil on a Jewish convert, and a total of three recorded Purim deaths inflicted by Jews in a span of more than 1,000 years.<ref>''Hebron Jews: memory and conflict in the land of Israel'', by Jerold S. Auerbach, p 137 | Other scholars, including Jerome Auerbach, state that evidence for Jewish violence on Purim through the centuries is "exceedingly meager", including occasional episodes of stone throwing, the spilling of rancid oil on a Jewish convert, and a total of three recorded Purim deaths inflicted by Jews in a span of more than 1,000 years.<ref>''Hebron Jews: memory and conflict in the land of Israel'', by Jerold S. Auerbach, p. 137 | ||
: "Aside |
: "Aside from an alleged 'great slaughter' of local Christians by Galilee Jews after the Persian invasion of Jerusalem in 614 CE, which other scholars believed to be dubious, evidence for repetitive Jewish violence on Purim through the centuries was exceedingly meager: occasional episodes of stone throwing, the spilling of 'rancid oil' on a Jewish convert, mockery of the Christian cross, and a total of three recorded Purim deaths inflicted by Jews in a span of more than 1,000 years…. Then, during the annual Purim parade in Hebron five years later a Jewish settler placed a ''keffiyah'' on an effigy of Haman, infuriating local Arabs."</ref> In a review of historian Elliot Horowitz's book ''Reckless rites: Purim and the legacy of Jewish violence'', ] pointed out that the incidences of Jewish violence against non-Jews through the centuries are extraordinarily few in number and that the connection between them and Purim is tenuous.<ref>Abby Wisse Schachter, {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110131034250/http://www.commentarymagazine.com//viewarticle.cfm//the-problem-with-purim-15348 |date=2011-01-31 }}, February 2010, ]</ref> | ||
Rabbi ] and historian Elliot Horowitz state that ], perpetrator of the ], may have been motivated by the Book of Esther, because the massacre was carried out on the day of Purim<ref> | Rabbi ] and historian Elliot Horowitz state that ], perpetrator of the ], may have been motivated by the Book of Esther, because the massacre was carried out on the day of Purim<ref name="Horowitz 2006"/>{{rp|4, 11, 315}}<ref>Quote from Horowitz 2006 p. 4: "On Dr. Baruch Goldstein .. opened fire, with his army-issued semi-automatic rifle, on dozens of Muslims who were praying inside the mosque at the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron, killing twenty nine. At the time a Hebrew version of an article about the history of Purim violence … as I saw the raucous celebrations in the center of Jerusalem continuing unabated, that there was a clear connection between past Purims and the present one was both exhilarating and disturbing… And the Sabbath before Purim … opens with the command to 'remember what th Amalek did' and concludes with .. the … exhortation to 'blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven'.</ref> | ||
<ref>Hunter, Alastair G. "Denominating Amalek: Racist stereotyping in the Bible and the Justification of Discrimination" in ''Sanctified aggression: legacies of biblical and post biblical vocabularies'', Jonneke Bekkenkamp, Yvonne Sherwood (Eds), Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003. Hunter quotes ] on p. 103: "on hearing of the murderous attack by Baruch Goldstein": "I know at once that this is no isolated crazy, this 'Baruch Goldstein' who has murdered forty of my cousins. I know at once, he has decided on this Purim to 'blot out the memory of the Amalek' not with a noise maker but with a machine gun… So then, in our generation, for some Jews the Palestinians become Amalek."</ref> | |||
*Horowitz, pp, 4, 11, 315. | |||
<ref>], ''Between Eden and Armageddon: the future of world religions, violence, and peacemaking'', Oxford University Press US, 2000, pp. 52–53.</ref> | |||
:Page 4: "On Dr. Baruch Goldstein .. opened fire, with his army-issued semi-automatic rifle, on dozens of Muslims who were praying inside the mosque at the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron, killing twenty nine. At the time a Hebrew version of an article about the history of Purim violence … as I saw the raucous celebrations in the center of Jerusalem continuing unabated, that there was a clear connection between past Purims and the present one was both exhilarating and disturbing… And the Sabbath before Purim … opens with the command to 'remember what th Amalek did' and concludes with .. the … exhortation to 'blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven'. | |||
<ref>New, David S. ''Holy war: the rise of militant Christian, Jewish, and Islamic fundamentalism'', McFarland, 2002, pp. 147–148</ref> but other scholars point out that the association with Purim is circumstantial because Goldstein never explicitly made such a connection.<ref>Auerbach, Jerold S, ''Hebron Jews: memory and conflict in the land of Israel'', Rowman & Littlefield, 2009, p. 137</ref> | |||
*Hunter, Alastair G. "Denominating Amalek: Racist stereotyping in the Bible and the Justification of Discrimination" in ''Sanctified aggression: legacies of biblical and post biblical vocabularies'', Jonneke Bekkenkamp, Yvonne Sherwood (Eds), Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003, page 103. | |||
:Hunter quotes ]: "on hearing of the murderous attack by Baruch Goldstein": "I know at once that this is no isolated crazy, this 'Baruch Goldstein' who has murdered forty of my cousins. I know at once, he has decided on this Purim to 'blot out the memory of the Amalek' not with a noise maker but with a machine gun… So then, in our generation, for some Jews the Palestinians become Amalek." | |||
*], ''Between Eden and Armageddon: the future of world religions, violence, and peacemaking'', Oxford University Press US, 2000, pp 52-53. | |||
*New, David S. ''Holy war: the rise of militant Christian, Jewish, and Islamic fundamentalism'', McFarland, 2002, pp 147-148</ref> but other scholars point out that the association with Purim is circumstantial because Goldstein never explicitly made such a connection.<ref>Auerbach, Jerold S, ''Hebron Jews: memory and conflict in the land of Israel'', Rowman & Littlefield, 2009, p 137</ref> | |||
== Modern acts of religiously motivated violence == | |||
The festival has been used by non-Jews as an opportunity to direct violence against Jews. ] often coincided with Jewish festivals and on Purim 1942, ten Jews were hanged in ] to avenge the hanging of Haman's ten sons.<ref>Paul Mendes-Flohr. , Jewish Publication Society, 2009. pg. 948. ISBN 0-8276-0892-6.</ref> In a similar incident in 1943, the Nazis shot 10 Jews from the ] ].<ref name=ESE>Elliott S. Horowitz. Reckless rites: Purim and the legacy of Jewish violence, Princeton University Press, 2006. pg. 91. ISBN 0-691-12491-4.</ref> On Purim eve that same year, over 100 Jewish doctors and their families were shot by the Nazis in ]. The following day, Jewish doctors were taken from ] and shot nearby in ].<ref name=ESE/> | |||
{{Neutrality section|date=October 2022}} | |||
{{See also|Jewish extremist terrorism}} | |||
== |
=== Cases === | ||
In the context of the ], the motives for ] which have been committed against Palestinians by Religious Jews in the ] are complex and varied according to Weisburg. While religious motivations for these acts of violence have been documented,<ref name="haaretz"/><ref>Weisburd, ''Jewish Settler Violence'', Penn State Press, 1985, pp. 20–52</ref><ref>Lustick, Ian, "Israel's Dangerous Fundamentalists", ''Foreign Policy'', 68 (Fall 1987), pp. 118–139</ref><ref>Tessler, Mark, "Religion and Politics in the Jewish State of Israel", in ''Religious resurgence and politics in the contemporary world'', (Emile Sahliyeh, Ed). SUNY Press, 1990 pp. 263–296.</ref> the use of non-defensive violence is outside of mainstream Judaism.<ref name=nytimes940301>{{cite news | url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/03/01/world/west-bank-massacre-overview-rabin-urges-palestinians-put-aside-anger-talk.html?pagewanted=all | work=The New York Times | title=West Bank Massacre: The Overview; Rabin Urges the Palestinians To Put Aside Anger and Talk | first=Clyde | last=Haberman | date=1994-03-01 | access-date=2010-04-28}}</ref><ref>. Ynetnews.com (1995-06-20). Retrieved on 2010-10-27.</ref><ref>The ethics of war in Asian civilizations: a comparative perspective By Torkel Brekke, Routledge, 2006, p. 44</ref><ref name=Morris2008p126>Morris 2008, pp. 126–128.</ref> | |||
===Radical Zionists=== | |||
The motives for violence by extremist Jewish settlers in the ] directed at Palestinians are complex and varied. Religious motivations have also been documented.<ref>Weisburd, ''Jewish Settler Violence'', Penn State Press, 1985, pp 20-52</ref><ref>Lustick, Ian, "Israel's Dangerous Fundamentalists", ''Foreign Policy'', 68 (Fall 1987), pp 118-139</ref><ref>Tessler, Mark, "Religion and Politics in the Jewish State of Israel", in ''Religious resurgence and politics in the contemporary world'', (Emile Sahliyeh, Ed). | |||
SUNY Press, 1990 | |||
pp 263-296.</ref> Some Jewish religious figures living in the occupied territories have condemned such behaviour.<ref>. Ynetnews.com (1995-06-20). Retrieved on 2010-10-27.</ref> After ] carried out the ] in 1994, some claimed{{Who|date=September 2010}} that his actions were influenced by Jewish religious doctrine, based on the ideology of the ] movement.<ref> | |||
*{{Cite book | |||
|title=Reckless rites: Purim and the legacy of Jewish violence | |||
|first=Elliott S. | |||
|last=Horowitz | |||
|publisher= Princeton University Press | |||
|year= 2006 | |||
|ISBN= 0691124914 | |||
|pages= 6–11 | |||
}} | |||
*{{Cite book | |||
|title=An understanding of Judaism | |||
|first=John D. | |||
|last= Rayner | |||
|ISBN= Berghahn Books | |||
|year= 1997 | |||
|ISBN= 1571819711 | |||
|page=57}} | |||
</ref> The act was denounced by mainstream Orthodox Judaism.<ref>The ethics of war in Asian civilizations: a comparative perspective By Torkel Brekke, Routledge, 2006, p.44</ref> | |||
] (1865–1935), the ] Chief Rabbi of ], stated that the Jewish people's settlement of the land should only proceed by peaceful means.<ref name="solomon">Judaism and the ethics of war, Norman Solomon. International Review of the Red Cross. Volume 87 Number 858 June 2005</ref> Contemporary settler movements follow Kook's son ] (1891–1982), who also refused to advocate an aggressive conquest of the Land of Israel.<ref name="solomon"/> Critics claim that ] and followers of Tzvi Yehuda Kook advocate violence based on Judaism's religious precepts.<ref> | |||
], ], and ] assert that Zionist leaders relied on religious doctrines for justification for the violent treatment of Arabs in Palestine, citing examples where pre-state Jewish militia used verses from the Bible to justify their violent acts, which included expulsions and massacres such as the one at ].<ref> | |||
* {{Cite book | |||
*Saleh Abdel Jawad (2007) "Zionist Massacres: the Creation of the Palestinian Refugee Problem in the 1948 War" in ''Israel and the Palestinian refugees'', Eyal Benvenistî, Chaim Gans, Sari Hanafi (Eds.), Springer, p. 78: | |||
:".. the Zionist movement, which claims to be secular, found it necessary to embrace the idea of 'the promised land' of Old Testament prophecy, to justify the confiscation of land and the expulsion of the Palestinians. For example, the speeches and letter of Chaim Weizman, the secular Zionist leader, are filled with references to the biblical origins of the Jewish claim to Palestine, which he often mixes liberally with more pragmatic and nationalistic claims. By the use of this premise, embraced in 1937, Zionists alleged that the Palestinians were usurpers in the Promised Land, and therefore their expulsion and death was justified. The Jewish-American writer Dan Kurzman, in his book ''Genesis 1948'' … describes the view of one of the Deir Yassin's killers: 'The Sternists followed the instructions of the Bible more rigidly than others. They honored the passage (Exodus 22:2): 'If a thief be found …' This meant, of course, that killing a thief was not really murder. And were not the enemies of Zionism thieves, who wanted to steal from the Jews what God had granted them?' '' | |||
*Carl. S. Ehrlich (1999) "Joshua, Judaism, and Genocide", in ''Jewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century'', Judit Targarona Borrás, Ángel Sáenz-Badillos (Eds). 1999, Brill. p 117-124. | |||
</ref> Jewish religious leaders at the time condemned such acts.<ref name=Morris2008p126>Morris 2008, pp. 126–128.</ref> | |||
] (1865–1935), the ] Chief Rabbi of ], urged that Jewish settlement of the land should proceed by peaceful means only.<ref name="solomon"/> Contemporary settler movements, follow Kook’s son ] (1891–1982), who also did not advocate aggressive conquest.<ref name="solomon"/> Critics claim that ] and followers of Tzvi Yehuda Kook advocate violence based on Judaism's religious precepts.<ref> | |||
*{{Cite book | |||
|title=Jewish Settler Violence | |title=Jewish Settler Violence | ||
|first=David | |first=David | ||
|last=Weisburd | |last=Weisburd | ||
|publisher= |
|publisher=Penn State Press | ||
|year= |
|year=1985 | ||
|isbn=0-271-02673-1 | |||
|ISBN= 0271026731 | |||
|page=65 | |page=65 | ||
}} | }} | ||
*{{Cite book | * {{Cite book | ||
|title=Fundamentalism | |title=Fundamentalism | ||
|first=Steve | |first=Steve | ||
Line 456: | Line 131: | ||
|publisher= Polity | |publisher= Polity | ||
|year= 2008 | |year= 2008 | ||
|isbn= 978-0-7456-4075-4 | |||
|ISBN= 0745640753 | |||
|page=4 | |page=4 | ||
}} | }} | ||
*Ehud Sprinzak, "From Messianic Pioneering to Vigilante Terrorism: The Case of the Gush Emunim Underground", in ''Inside terrorist organizations'' David C. Rappoport (Ed.), Routledge, 2001. |
* Ehud Sprinzak, "From Messianic Pioneering to Vigilante Terrorism: The Case of the Gush Emunim Underground", in ''Inside terrorist organizations'' David C. Rappoport (Ed.), Routledge, 2001. pp. 194–214.</ref> ], ], and ] assert that radical Zionist leaders relied on religious doctrines for justification for the violent treatment of Arabs in Palestine, citing examples where pre-state Jewish militia used verses from the Bible to justify their violent acts, which included expulsions and massacres such as the one at ].<ref> | ||
* Saleh Abdel Jawad (2007) "Zionist Massacres: the Creation of the Palestinian Refugee Problem in the 1948 War" in ''Israel and the Palestinian refugees'', Eyal Benvenistî, Chaim Gans, Sari Hanafi (Eds.), Springer, p. 78: | |||
:".. the Zionist movement, which claims to be secular, found it necessary to embrace the idea of 'the promised land' of Old Testament prophecy, to justify the confiscation of land and the expulsion of the Palestinians. For example, the speeches and letter of Chaim Weizman, the secular Zionist leader, are filled with references to the biblical origins of the Jewish claim to Palestine, which he often mixes liberally with more pragmatic and nationalistic claims. By the use of this premise, embraced in 1937, Zionists alleged that the Palestinians were usurpers in the Promised Land, and therefore their expulsion and death was justified. The Jewish-American writer Dan Kurzman, in his book ''Genesis 1948'' … describes the view of one of the Deir Yassin's killers: 'The Sternists followed the instructions of the Bible more rigidly than others. They honored the passage (Exodus 22:2): 'If a thief be found …' This meant, of course, that killing a thief was not really murder. And were not the enemies of Zionism thieves, who wanted to steal from the Jews what God had granted them?' '' | |||
* Carl. S. Ehrlich (1999) "Joshua, Judaism, and Genocide", in ''Jewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century'', Judit Targarona Borrás, Ángel Sáenz-Badillos (Eds). 1999, Brill. pp. 117–124. | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
After ] carried out the ] in 1994, his actions were widely interpreted as being based on the radical Zionist ideology of the ] movement, and they were condemned as such by mainstream religious and ] but they were praised by a number of radical Zionists.<ref name="Horowitz 2006"/>{{rp|6–11}}<ref>{{Cite book | |||
====Assassination of Yitzhak Rabin==== | |||
|title=An Understanding of Judaism | |||
|first=John D. | |||
|last= Rayner | |||
|publisher=Berghahn Books | |||
|year=1997 | |||
|isbn=1-57181-971-1 | |||
|page=57}} | |||
</ref><ref name="Tuman">{{cite book |title=Communicating Terror: The Rhetorical Dimensions of Terrorism |first=Joseph S. |last=Tuman |page=93 |isbn=1-4129-7324-4 |publisher=Sage Publications |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=siiaBHIPs1QC&q=ramadan%20purim%20goldstein&pg=PA93 |year=2003 |access-date=2010-03-13 |quote=Although Goldstein did not say anything during his attack to explain his actions it is known that the night before his assault he had attended a service at the Jewish side of the Cave of the Patriarchs where after listening to the traditional reading from the ], he told others who were there that they should all behave like ]. The timing of his attack at the same site the next day hardly seems to be the product of happenstance or coincidence. It was the day of ]. Moreover, although his actions seemed to be the product of a mind that had snapped or become depraved, there did not seem to be any sign that he was suffering from a mental disorder. His actions were deliberate and intentional. Goldstein was troubled by the ongoing peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians in Oslo and he was openly concerned that a Palestinian state was about to be created. His attack on Muslim worshippers at the same site, while Purim coincided with ], was an attempt to symbolically cast himself in the story as ]. Indeed, that was exactly the way in which his actions were interpreted by other settlers at Kiryat Arba, and in the years to come after 1994, there would be numerous instances in which the settlers would also celebrate Purim by invoking Goldstein's memory and image in a provocative manner. }}</ref><ref name=times940307>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,980291-1,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090416213447/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,980291-1,00.html |archive-date=April 16, 2009 |title=When Fury Rules |magazine=] |date=March 7, 1994 | access-date=2010-04-28}} {{subscription required}}</ref><ref>. Avi Issacharoff and Chaim Levinson, Haaretz, 28 February 2010</ref> ], ] of Hebron and ] in the southern ] and head of the "Council of Rabbis of ]" has made speeches legitimizing the killing of non-Jews and praising Goldstein as a saint and martyr. Lior also said "a thousand non-Jewish lives are not worth a Jew's fingernail" according to journalists.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://english.aljazeera.net/archive/2004/05/2008410111651456766.html |title=Rabbi supports killings in Rafah |author=Khalid Amayreh |date=20 May 2004 |publisher=] |access-date=17 March 2010}}</ref><ref name="FP">"The List: The World's Worst Religious Leaders". foreignpolicy.com. April 2008 (original article no longer available online). Copies are and reproduced on {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110228054305/http://richarddawkins.net/articles/2462 |date=2011-02-28 }}. Retrieved 17 March 2010.</ref> Lior publicly gave permission to spill blood of Arab persons and has publicly supported extreme ] of Jewish faith.<ref>Haaretz, 2010 Aug. 23, "Those Noisy Barbarians, Dov Lior, the Chief Rabbi of Hebron, Doesn't Want Jews to Take on Boogie-Woogie from the Jungle," http://www.haaretz.com/culture/arts-leisure/those-noisy-barbarians-1.309629</ref> | |||
{{Importance section|date=September 2016}} | |||
Following an arson incident in 2010, in which a mosque in Yasuf village was desecrated, apparently by settlers from the nearby Gush Etzion settlement bloc,<ref name="mosques"> by Rabbi Gideon Sylvester. The Jewish Chronicle Online. 22 October 2010.</ref><ref> by Avi Issacharoff. Haaretz.</ref><ref> by Diaa Hadid. Associated Press.</ref> the ] ] condemned the attack and he also likened the arson to ], he said: "This is how ] began, the tragedy of the ]."<ref name="haaretz.com"> by Anshel Pfeffer. Haaretz.</ref> Rabbi ], a well-known peace activist, visited the mosque and replaced the burnt Koran with new copies.<ref>. Reuters.</ref> The rabbi stated: "This visit is to say that although there are people who oppose peace, he who opposes peace is opposed to God" and "] also prohibits damaging a holy place." He also remarked that arson in a ] is an attempt to sow ] between Jews and Arabs.<ref name="haaretz.com"/><ref>. The Jewish Chronicles Online. October 7, 2010.</ref> | |||
According to Haaretz, in July 2010, ] who heads Dorshei Yihudcha ] in the ] settlement of ], was arrested by Israeli police based on suspicion that he had written a book that encourages Jews to kill ]. The book, ''The King's Torah'', (''Torat HaMelech'') claims that, under the ] and ], the killing of ]s is legal and in some cases, the killing of the babies of enemies is also legal.<ref> by Chaim Levinson. Haaretz.</ref><ref> by Ben Hartman. Jpost.com.</ref> Later in August 2010, police arrested rabbi Yosef Elitzur-Hershkowitz{{snd}}co-author of Shapira's book{{snd}}on the suspicion of incitement to racial violence, possession of a racist text, and possession of material that incites to violence. While the book has been endorsed by radical Zionist leaders including Dov Lior<ref name="haaretz"/> and ],<ref>. Investigators suspect Elitzur-Hershkowitz of racial incitement by Yaakov Lappin.Jpost.com.</ref> it has been widely condemned by mainstream secular and religious Jews.<ref name="haaretz">Daniel Estrin for ''The Forward'' and ''Haaretz'' Jan. 22, 2010 </ref> Rabbi ] stated that in modern times no one matches the biblical definition of an idolater, and therefore ruled that Jews in Israel have a moral responsibility to treat all citizens with the highest standards of humanity.<ref name="mosques"/> | |||
==== Assassinations ==== | |||
On November 7, 1938, a young Polish Jew named ] attacked and shot German diplomat ] in the German embassy in Paris five times, mortally wounding him with bullets to the spleen, stomach and pancreas.<ref name="steinweis">{{cite book |title=Kristallnacht 1938 |author=Alan E. Steinweis |publisher=Belknap Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0674036239 |page= |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/kristallnacht19300stei/page/179 }}</ref><ref name="macdonogh">{{cite book|title=1938: Hitler's Gamble |author=Giles MacDonogh |page=217}}</ref> The attack occurred against the backdrop of the ], which led to Grynszpan's family, together with more than 12,000 Polish-born Jews, being expelled by the Nazi government from Germany to Poland in the so-called '']'' on October 28, 1938. Grynszpan, trying to pass himself off as a spy, asked if he could see "His Excellency, the ambassador" to hand over the "most important document" he claimed to have.<ref>Kirsch, Jonathan ''The Short, Strange Life of Herschel Grynszpan'', New York: W.W. Norton, p. 237.</ref> Instead, according to the French police account, he shouted right before pulling out his gun: "You're a filthy ]! In the name of 12,000 persecuted Jews, here is the document!"<ref>{{cite web|last1=Prempain|first1=Laurence|last2=Wyler|first2=Manuela|title=Kristalnacht 9-19 novembre 1938|url=http://jewishtraces.org/kristalnacht-9-10-novembre-1938/|work=Jewishtraces.org|access-date=3 April 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140926033829/http://jewishtraces.org/kristalnacht-9-10-novembre-1938/|archive-date=26 September 2014|language=fr}}</ref> At his trial, Grynszpan wanted to use the "Jewish avenger" defense successfully used by ] at his trial in 1927, but Grynszpan's French lawyer ] pursued a defense based on Rath being a homosexual who tried to seduce Grynszpan, an approach which succeeded in delaying the trial indefinitely. Jewish organizations were horrified by Grynszpan's action. The ] "deplored the fatal shooting of an official of the German Embassy by a young Polish Jew of seventeen", but "protested energetically against the violent attacks in the German press against the whole of Judaism because of this act" and "reprisals taken against the German Jews". In France, the ] "rejected all forms of violence, regardless of author or victim" but "indignantly protested against the barbarous treatment inflicted on an entire innocent population."<ref>Schwab (1990). p. 41</ref> | |||
The ] ] by ] was motivated by |
The ] ] by ] was motivated by Amir's personal political views and his understanding of Judaism's religious law of ''moiser'' (the duty to eliminate a Jew who intends to turn another Jew over to non-Jewish authorities, thus putting a Jew's life in danger<ref> | ||
{{cite book | {{cite book | ||
|title=Free Judaism and religion in Israel | |title=Free Judaism and religion in Israel | ||
Line 470: | Line 164: | ||
|year=1999 | |year=1999 | ||
|page=47 | |page=47 | ||
|isbn=978-965-7111-00-0}}</ref>) and'' ]'' (a bystander can kill a person who is pursuing another person in an attempt to murder him or her if he or she cannot be stopped in other ways).<ref name="Stern 2004"/>{{rp|91}} Amir's interpretation has been described as "a gross distortion of Jewish law and tradition"<ref>Rabbi Arthur Waskow, The Shalom Center, 14 November 2005 . Quote: "First of all, the law of the pursuer only applies to a spontaneous act, whereas Yigal Amir planned this assassination for two years. Secondly, the law of the pursuer is only intended to save a potential victim from imminent death. There is absolutely no proof that withdrawing from certain territories will directly lead to the death of any Jews. On the contrary, Prime Minister Rabin, over half the members of the Knesset, and over half the population of Israel believe exactly the opposite - that it will save Jewish lives. Lastly, this law does not refer to elected representatives, for if Yitzhak Rabin was really a pursuer, then so are all his followers and that would mean that Amir should have killed over half the population of Israel! In other words, even according to the law of the pursuer, this act was totally futile and senseless since the peace process will continue."</ref> and the mainstream Jewish view is that Rabin's assassin had no Halakhic basis to shoot Prime Minister Rabin.<ref name=koltora> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050427111047/http://www.koltorah.org/ravj/14-10%20The%20Halacha%20of%20Rodef%20and%20the%20Rabin%20Shooting.htm |date=2005-04-27 }}. Koltorah.org (2004-11-20). Retrieved on 2010-10-27.</ref> | |||
|isbn=978-965-7111-00-0}}</ref>) and'' ]'' (a bystander can kill a one who is pursuing another to murder him or her if he cannot otherwise be stopped).<ref>{{Cite book | |||
|title=Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill | |||
|first=Jessica | |||
|last=Stern | |||
|publisher=HarperCollins | |||
|year= 2004 | |||
|ISBN=0-06-050533-8, | |||
|page=91}}</ref> Amir’s interpretation has been described as "a gross distortion of Jewish law and tradition"<ref>Rabbinic response: Jewish Law on the Killing of Yitzhak Rabin, By Rabbi Arthur Waskow, The Shalom Center, 11/14/2005: "First of all, the law of the pursuer only applies to a spontaneous act, whereas Yigal Amir planned this assassination for two years. Secondly, the law of the pursuer is only intended to save a potential victim from imminent death. There is absolutely no proof that withdrawing from certain territories will directly lead to the death of any Jews. On the contrary, Prime Minister Rabin, over half the members of the Knesset, and over half the population of Israel believe exactly the opposite - that it will save Jewish lives. Lastly, this law does not refer to elected representatives, for if Yitzhak Rabin was really a pursuer, then so are all his followers and that would mean that Amir should have killed over half the population of Israel! In other words, even according to the law of the pursuer, this act was totally futile and senseless since the peace process will continue."</ref> and the mainstream Jewish view is that Rabin's assassin had no Halachic basis to shoot Prime Minister Rabin.<ref name=koltora>. Koltorah.org (2004-11-20). Retrieved on 2010-10-27.</ref> | |||
===Extremist organizations=== | === Extremist organizations === | ||
{{ |
{{main|Jewish extremist terrorism}} | ||
In the course of history |
In the course of ], some individuals and organizations have endorsed or advocated violence based on their interpretations of Jewish religious principles. Such instances of ] are considered extremist aberrations of Judaism by adherents of mainstream Judaism, and as a result, they are not considered representative of the tenets of Judaism.<ref name="slate1"> | ||
{{Cite news | |||
|url=http://www.slate.com/id/2246139 | |||
|title=The Ghosts of Purim Past: The holiday's violent beginnings{{snd}}and what they mean for the Jewish future | |||
|first=Steven I. | |||
|last=Weiss | |||
|date=2010-02-26 | |||
}}</ref><ref name="Dialogika"> | |||
{{cite news | {{cite news | ||
|url=http://www.ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/educational-and-liturgical-materials/liturgical-resources/lent-easter/787-langer08mar22 | |url=http://www.ccjr.us/dialogika-resources/educational-and-liturgical-materials/liturgical-resources/lent-easter/787-langer08mar22 | ||
Line 490: | Line 184: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
* ] (defunct) and ] |
* ] (defunct) and ]<ref></ref><ref> Washington Report on Middle East Affairs</ref><ref>{{Dead link|date=February 2020 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} Council for Foreign Relations, 20 March 2008</ref> | ||
* ] (defunct): formed by members of ].<ref> For The Land and The Lord: The Evolution of Gush Emunim, by Ian S. Lustick</ref> | * ] (defunct): formed by members of ].<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201174249/http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/polisci/faculty/data/lustick/for_the_land/lustick13.html |date=2008-12-01 }} For The Land and The Lord: The Evolution of Gush Emunim, by Ian S. Lustick</ref> | ||
* ] (defunct): an organisation operating in Israel from 1950 to 1953 with the objective of imposing Jewish religious law in the country and establishing a ].<ref>Pedahzur, Ami, and Arie Perliger (2009). ''Jewish Terrorism in Israel''. ]. |
* ] (defunct): an organisation operating in Israel from 1950 to 1953 with the objective of imposing Jewish religious law in the country and establishing a ].<ref>Pedahzur, Ami, and Arie Perliger (2009). ''Jewish Terrorism in Israel''. ]. pp. 33–36</ref> | ||
* The ] (JDL): founded in 1969 by Rabbi ] in ], with the declared purpose of protecting Jews from harassment and ].<ref name="backgrounder"></ref> |
* The ] (JDL): founded in 1969 by Rabbi ] in ], with the declared purpose of protecting Jews from harassment and ].<ref name="backgrounder"> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100414090038/http://www.adl.org/extremism/jdl_chron.asp |date=2010-04-14 }}</ref> ] statistics show that, from 1980 to 1985, 15 terrorist attacks were attempted in the U.S. by members of the JDL.<ref>{{Cite book | ||
|title=The Achille Lauro Hijacking: Lessons in the Politics and Prejudice of Terrorism | |title=The Achille Lauro Hijacking: Lessons in the Politics and Prejudice of Terrorism | ||
|first=Michael K. | |first=Michael K. | ||
Line 500: | Line 194: | ||
|year=2004 | |year=2004 | ||
|publisher=Brassey's Inc. | |publisher=Brassey's Inc. | ||
|isbn=1-57488-779-3}}</ref> The |
|isbn=1-57488-779-3}}</ref> The FBI's Mary Doran described the JDL in 2004 Congressional testimony as "a proscribed terrorist group".<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090311144410/https://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress04/doran061604.htm |date=2009-03-11 }}</ref> The ] states that, during the JDL's first two decades of activity, it was an "active terrorist organization".<ref name="backgrounder" /><ref name="MIPT">{{Cite web |url=http://www.start.umd.edu/start/data/tops/terrorist_organization_profile.asp?id=183 |title=JDL group profile from the National Consortium for the Study of Terror and Responses to Terrorism |access-date=2010-10-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100828165700/http://www.start.umd.edu/start/data/tops/terrorist_organization_profile.asp?id=183 |archive-date=2010-08-28 }}</ref> ] groups are banned in ].<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070306164558/http://www.psepc-sppcc.gc.ca/prg/ns/le/cle-en.asp |date=2007-03-06 }} Public Safety Canada</ref><ref name="USSD"> U.S. Department of State, 11 October 2005</ref><ref> ''Official Journal of the European Union'', 23 December 2005</ref> | ||
== General claims == | |||
===Endorsement of violence by extremist settler rabbis=== | |||
Some settler rabbis, in the unique conditions of West Bank settlements,{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}} issued statements that diverge from normative Jewish practice.<ref name="haaretz"/> | |||
Some ] such as ] argue that ]. For example, Nelson-Pallmeyer writes that "Judaism, ] and ] will continue to contribute to the destruction of the world until and unless each challenges violence in ']' and until each affirms nonviolent, including the nonviolent power of God."<ref>{{cite book|title=Is Religion Killing Us?: Violence in the Bible and the Quran |first=Jack |last=Nelson-Pallmeyer |publisher=Continuum International Publishing Group |year=2005 |page=136 |isbn=978-0-8264-1779-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tux7YjmQ8O0C&pg=PA136 }}</ref> | |||
], ] of ] and ] in the southern ] and head of the "Council of Rabbis of ]" has made speeches legitimizing the killing of non-Jews and praising ], a Jewish settler who in a ] 29 ] worshippers while they were praying in mosque in ], as a saint and martyr. Lior also said "a thousand non-Jewish lives are not worth a Jew's fingernail".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://english.aljazeera.net/archive/2004/05/2008410111651456766.html |title=Rabbi supports killings in Rafah |author=Khalid Amayreh |date=20 May 2004 |publisher=] |accessdate=17 March 2010}}</ref><ref name="FP">"The List: The World’s Worst Religious Leaders". foreignpolicy.com. April 2008 (original article no longer available online). Copies are and reproduced on . Retrieved 17 March 2010.</ref> Lior publicly gave permission to spill blood of Arab persons and has publicly supported extreme right-wing ].<ref>Haaretz, 2010 Aug. 23, "Those Noisy Barbarians, Dov Lior, the Chief Rabbi of Hebron, Doesn't Want Jews to Take on Boogie-Woogie from the Jungle," http://www.haaretz.com/culture/arts-leisure/those-noisy-barbarians-1.309629</ref> | |||
] writes of ] that "Jews and Christians who smugly console themselves that Islam is the only violent religion are willfully ignoring their past. Nowhere is the struggle between faith and violence described more vividly, and with more stomach-turning details of ruthlessness, than in the ]".<ref>{{cite book |title=Where God was born: a journey by land to the roots of religion |first=Bruce S. |last=Feiler |publisher=HarperCollins |year=2005 |page= |isbn=978-0-06-082614-7 |url=https://archive.org/details/wheregodwasborn00bruc_0 |url-access=registration }}</ref> Similarly, Burggraeve and Vervenne describe the Old Testament as full of violence and evidence of both a violent society and a violent god. They write that, "n numerous Old Testament texts the power and glory of Israel's God is described in the language of violence." They assert that more than one thousand passages refer to YHWH as acting violently or supporting the violence of humans and that more than one hundred passages involve divine commands to kill humans.<ref>{{cite book |title=Swords into plowshares: theological reflections on peace |first1=Roger |last1=Burggraeve |first2=Marc |last2=Vervenne |publisher=Peeters Publishers |year=1991 |pages=82, 109 |isbn=978-90-6831-372-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q8KvY0W58eYC&pg=PA109}}</ref> | |||
In July 2010, ] who heads Dorshei Yihudcha ] in the ] settlement of ], was arrested by Israeli police for writing a book that allegedly encourages the killing of ]. In his book "The King's Torah" (''Torat Hamelech'') he wrote that under ] and ] it is legal to kill ]s.<ref> by Chaim Levinson. Haaretz.</ref> The section entitled "Conclusions – Chapter Five: The Killing of Gentiles in War" reads that in some cases it is permitted to kill the babies of enemy forces "because of the future danger they may present since they will grow up to be evil like their parents."<ref> by Ben Hartman. Jpost.com.</ref> Later in August 2010 police arrested rabbi Yosef Elitzur-Hershkowitz - co-author of Shapira's book - on the grounds of incitement to racial violence, possession of a racist text, and possession of material that incites to violence. The controversial book was endorsed by Rabbi ] of ], a respected figure among many mainstream religious Zionists<ref name="haaretz"/> and ], son of ] spiritual leader Ovadia Yosef.<ref>. Investigators suspect Elitzur-Hershkowitz of racial incitement by Yaakov Lappin.Jpost.com.</ref> | |||
] Christian churches and theologians argue that Judaism is a violent religion and they also argue that the god of Israel is a violent god, while Christianity is a ] and they also argue that the god of Christianity is one that only expresses love.<ref>{{cite book |title=Beyond violence: religious sources of social transformation in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam |editor=Heft, James |publisher=Fordham University Press|year=2004|isbn=978-0-8232-2335-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rxiINuHNAIUC&q=Judaism+%22violent+religion%22&pg=PT96}}</ref> While this point of view has been commonly held throughout the ] and while it currently remains a common assumption among contemporary Christians, it has been rejected by mainstream Christian theologians and denominations since the Holocaust.<ref>R. Kendall Soulen. ''The God of Israel and Christian Theology''. Fortress Press (June 11, 1996) {{ISBN|978-0800628833}}.</ref>{{rp|1–5}} | |||
According to ], "The King's Torah" reflects a fringe viewpoint held by a minority of rabbis in the ]. The book's wide dissemination and the enthusiastic endorsements of prominent rabbis have spotlighted what might have otherwise remained an "isolated commentary". A coalition of religious Zionist groups, has asked Israel's Supreme Court to order confiscation of books inciting to violence and to arrest the authors.<ref name="haaretz"></ref> | |||
== See also == | |||
Rabbi Zalman Nechemia Goldberg who initially endorsed the book, rescinded his approval a month after its release, saying that the book includes statements that "have no place in human intelligence."<ref name="haaretz"/> | |||
{{columns-list|colwidth=25em| | |||
* ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
**** ] | |||
***** ] | |||
****** ] | |||
* ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
* ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
* ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
**** ] | |||
**** ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
** ] | |||
* ] | |||
** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
**** ] | |||
* ] | |||
** ] | |||
* ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
** ] | |||
* ] | |||
** ] | |||
** ] | |||
}} | |||
== References == | |||
The book has also been denounced by ], chief rabbi of ] and head of Yeshivat Ateret Yerushalayim.<ref name="haaretz"/> | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||
== Sources == | |||
=== Views on Violence against Islam === | |||
While Judaism contains commandments to exterminate idol worship, according to all rabbinic authorities, Islam contains no trace of idolatry.<ref name="mosques"/> Rabbi ] stated that in modern times no one matches the biblical definition of an idolater, and therefore ruled that Jews in Israel have a moral responsibility to treat all citizens with the highest standards of humanity.<ref name="mosques"/> | |||
Following an arson incident in 2010, in which a mosque in Yasuf village was desecrated, apparently by settlers from the nearby Gush Etzion settlement bloc,<ref name="mosques"> by Rabbi Gideon Sylvester. The Jewish Chronicle Online. 22 october 2010.</ref><ref> by Avi Issacharoff. Haaretz.</ref><ref> by Diaa Hadid. Associated Press.</ref> the ] ] condemned the attack and equated the arson to ], he said: "This is how the Holocaust began, the tragedy of the Jewish people of Europe."<ref name="haaretz.com"> by Anshel Pfeffer. Haaretz.</ref> Rabbi ], a well-known peace activist, visited the mosque and replaced the burnt Koran with new copies.<ref>. Reuters.</ref> The rabbi stated: "This visit is to say that although there are people who oppose peace, he who opposes peace is opposed to God" and "Jewish law also prohibits damaging a holy place." He also remarked that arson in a mosque is an attempt to sow hatred between Jews and Arabs.<ref name="haaretz.com"/><ref>. The Jewish Chronicles Online. October 7, 2010.</ref> | |||
==See also== | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==Bibliography== | |||
{{Refbegin|2}} | {{Refbegin|2}} | ||
<!-- B --> | |||
*Berger, Michael S., "Taming the Beast: Rabbinic Pacification of Second-Century Jewish Nationalism", in ''Belief and bloodshed: religion and violence across time and tradition'', James K. Wellman (Ed.), Rowman & Littlefield, 2007, pp 47–62 | |||
* Berger, Michael S., "Taming the Beast: Rabbinic Pacification of Second-Century Jewish Nationalism", in ''Belief and bloodshed: religion and violence across time and tradition'', James K. Wellman (Ed.), Rowman & Littlefield, 2007, pp. 47–62 | |||
*Boustan, Ra'anan S., "Violence, Scripture, and Textual Practice in Early Judaism and Christianity", in ''Violence, Scripture, and Textual Practice in Early Judaism and Christianity'', Ra'anan S. Boustan, Alex P. Jassen, Calvin J. Roetzel (Eds), BRILL, 2010 pp 1–12 | |||
* Boustan, Ra'anan S., "Violence, Scripture, and Textual Practice in Early Judaism and Christianity", in ''Violence, Scripture, and Textual Practice in Early Judaism and Christianity'', Ra'anan S. Boustan, Alex P. Jassen, Calvin J. Roetzel (Eds), Brill, 2010 pp. 1–12 | |||
*], ''Abraham's Curse: The Roots of Violence in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam'', Doubleday, 2009 | |||
* {{Citation | last =Bowersock | first =G. W. | year =2013 | title =The Throne of Adulis: Red Sea Wars of the Eve of Islam | publisher =Oxford University Press}} | |||
*], ''World orders, old and new'', Columbia University Press, 1996 | |||
<!-- C --> | |||
*Ehrlich, Carl. S, "Joshua, Judaism, and Genocide", in ''Jewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century'', Judit Targarona Borrás, Ángel Sáenz-Badillos (Eds). 1999, Brill. pp 117–124. | |||
* |
* ], ''Abraham's Curse: The Roots of Violence in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam'', Doubleday, 2009 | ||
* ], ''World orders, old and new'', Columbia University Press, 1996 | |||
*], ''Under the Cover of War: The Zionist Expulsion of the Palestinians'', Arabicus Books & Media, LLC, 2009 | |||
* Ehrlich, Carl. S, "Joshua, Judaism, and Genocide", in ''Jewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century'', Judit Targarona Borrás, Ángel Sáenz-Badillos (Eds). 1999, Brill. pp. 117–124. | |||
*], ''"Remember Amalek!": vengeance, zealotry, and group destruction in the Bible according to Philo, Pseudo-Philo, and Josephus'', Hebrew Union College Press, 2004 | |||
* |
* Ellens, J. Harold (Ed.), ''The destructive power of religion: violence in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam'', Greenwood Publishing Group, 2007 | ||
* ], ''Under the Cover of War: The Zionist Expulsion of the Palestinians'', Arabicus Books & Media, LLC, 2009 | |||
*Glick, Leonard B., "Religion and Genocide", in ''The Widening circle of genocide'', Alan L. Berger (Ed). Transaction Publishers, 1994, pp 43–74 | |||
*], '' |
* ], ''"Remember Amalek!": vengeance, zealotry, and group destruction in the Bible according to Philo, Pseudo-Philo, and Josephus'', Hebrew Union College Press, 2004 | ||
* Firestone, Reuven, "Judaism on Violence and Reconciliation: An Examination of Key Sources", in ''Beyond violence: religious sources of social transformation in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam'', James Heft (Ed.), Fordham Univ Press, 2004, pp. 74–87 | |||
*], ''Arab attitudes to Israel'', John Wiley and Sons, 1974 | |||
* Glick, Leonard B., "Religion and Genocide", in ''The Widening circle of genocide'', ] (Ed). Transaction Publishers, 1994, pp. 43–74 | |||
*Heft, James (Ed.), ''Beyond violence: religious sources of social transformation in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam'', Fordham Univ Press, 2004 | |||
*], '' |
* ], ''Between Eden and Armageddon: the future of world religions, violence, and peacemaking'', Oxford University Press US, 2000. | ||
* ], ''Arab attitudes to Israel'', John Wiley and Sons, 1974 | |||
*], ''The just war and jihad: violence in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam'', Prometheus Books, 2006 | |||
* Heft, James (Ed.), ''Beyond violence: religious sources of social transformation in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam'', Fordham Univ Press, 2004 | |||
* ], ''The gun and the olive branch: the roots of violence in the Middle East'', Nation Books, 2003 | |||
* ], ''The just war and jihad: violence in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam'', Prometheus Books, 2006 | |||
*Horowitz, Elliott S., ''Reckless rites: Purim and the legacy of Jewish violence'', Princeton University Press, 2006 | *Horowitz, Elliott S., ''Reckless rites: Purim and the legacy of Jewish violence'', Princeton University Press, 2006 | ||
*Jacobs, Steven Leonard, "The Last Uncomfortable Religious Question? |
* Jacobs, Steven Leonard, "The Last Uncomfortable Religious Question? Monotheistic Exclusivism and Textual Superiority in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as Sources of Hate and Genocide", in ''Confronting genocide: Judaism, Christianity, Islam'', Steven L. Jacobs (Ed.), Lexington Books, 2009, pp. 35–46 | ||
*], ''Terror in the mind of God: the global rise of religious violence'', University of California Press, 2003 | * ], ''A History of the Jews'', Harper Perennial, 1987 | ||
* ], ''Terror in the mind of God: the global rise of religious violence'', University of California Press, 2003 | |||
*], "Theological Warrants for Genocide: |
* ], "Theological Warrants for Genocide: Judaism, Islam, and Christianity", in ''Confronting genocide: Judaism, Christianity, Islam'', Steven L. Jacobs (Ed.), Lexington Books, 2009, pp. 3–34 | ||
*], ''For the land and the Lord: Jewish fundamentalism in Israel'', Council on Foreign Relations, 1988 | * ], ''For the land and the Lord: Jewish fundamentalism in Israel'', Council on Foreign Relations, 1988 | ||
*], ''The Bible and Zionism: Invented Traditions, Archaeology and Post-colonialism in Palestine-Israel'', Zed Books, 2007 | * ], ''The Bible and Zionism: Invented Traditions, Archaeology and Post-colonialism in Palestine-Israel'', Zed Books, 2007 | ||
*], ''The birth of the Palestinian refugee problem revisited'', Cambridge University Press, 2004 | * ], ''The birth of the Palestinian refugee problem revisited'', Cambridge University Press, 2004 | ||
*Niditch, Susan, ''War in the Hebrew Bible: a study in the ethics of violence'', Oxford University Press US, 1995 | * Niditch, Susan, ''War in the Hebrew Bible: a study in the ethics of violence'', Oxford University Press US, 1995 | ||
*], ''The ethnic cleansing of Palestine'', Oneworld, 2007 | * ], ''The ethnic cleansing of Palestine'', Oneworld, 2007 | ||
*Pedahzur, Ami, ''Jewish terrorism in Israel'', |
* Pedahzur, Ami, ''Jewish terrorism in Israel'', Columbia University Press, Columbia University Press, 2009 | ||
*Perliger, Arie and Weinberg, Leonard, "Jewish Self-Defence and Terrorist Groups Prior to the Establishment of the State of Israel: Roots and Traditions", in ''Religious fundamentalism and political extremism'', Perliger, Arie (Ed.), Taylor & Francis, 2004, pp |
* Perliger, Arie and Weinberg, Leonard, "Jewish Self-Defence and Terrorist Groups Prior to the Establishment of the State of Israel: Roots and Traditions", in ''Religious fundamentalism and political extremism'', Perliger, Arie (Ed.), Taylor & Francis, 2004, pp. 91–118 | ||
*Phillips, Gary A., "More Than the Jews … His Blood Be Upon All the Children: |
* Phillips, Gary A., "More Than the Jews … His Blood Be Upon All the Children: Biblical Violence, Genocide and Responsible Reading", in ''Confronting genocide: Judaism, Christianity, Islam'', Steven L. Jacobs (Ed.), Lexington Books, 2009, pp. 77–87 | ||
*Pitkanen, Pekka, "Memory, Witnesses, and Genocide in the Book of Joshua", in ''Reading the law: studies in honour of Gordon J. Wenham'', |
* Pitkanen, Pekka, "Memory, Witnesses, and Genocide in the Book of Joshua", in ''Reading the law: studies in honour of Gordon J. Wenham'', J. Gordon McConville, Karl Möller (Eds), Continuum International Publishing Group, 2007, pp. 267–282 | ||
*], |
* ], ''The Bible and colonialism: a moral critique'', Sheffield Academic Press, 1997. | ||
*], ''Palestine and Israel: a challenge to justice'', Duke University Press, 1990 | * ], ''Palestine and Israel: a challenge to justice'', Duke University Press, 1990 | ||
*] |
* ] (2007) "Zionist Massacres: the Creation of the Palestinian Refugee Problem in the 1948 War" in ''Israel and the Palestinian refugees'', Eyal Benvenistî, Chaim Gans, Sari Hanafi (Eds.), Springer, 2007 | ||
* Schwab, Gerald, ''The Day the Holocaust Began'', Praeger, New York, 1990 {{isbn|9780275935764}} | |||
*Selengut, Charles, ''Sacred fury: understanding religious violence'', Rowman & Littlefield, 2008 | |||
* Selengut, Charles, ''Sacred fury: understanding religious violence'', Rowman & Littlefield, 2008 | |||
*], ''Jewish fundamentalism in Israel'', Pluto Press, 1999 | |||
*Sprinzak, Ehud, ''Brother against brother: violence and extremism in Israeli politics from Altalena to the Rabin assassination'', Simon and Schuster, 1999 | * ], ''Jewish fundamentalism in Israel'', Pluto Press, 1999 | ||
* Sprinzak, Ehud, ''Brother against brother: violence and extremism in Israeli politics from Altalena to the Rabin assassination'', Simon and Schuster, 1999 | |||
*Van Wees, Hans, "Genocide in the Ancient World", in ''The Oxford Handbook of Genocide Studies'', |
* Van Wees, Hans, "Genocide in the Ancient World", in ''The Oxford Handbook of Genocide Studies'', Donald Bloxham, A. Dirk Moses (Eds), Oxford University Press US, 2010, pp. 239–258. | ||
*Weisburd, David, ''Jewish Settler Violence'', Penn State Press, 1985 | * Weisburd, David, ''Jewish Settler Violence'', Penn State Press, 1985 | ||
*Whitelam, Keith W., ''The invention of ancient Israel: the silencing of Palestinian history'', Routledge, 1996 | * Whitelam, Keith W., ''The invention of ancient Israel: the silencing of Palestinian history'', Routledge, 1996 | ||
{{Refend}} | {{Refend}} | ||
==Footnotes== | |||
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}} | |||
{{Criticism of religion}} | {{Criticism of religion}} | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Judaism And Violence}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Judaism And Violence}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] |
Latest revision as of 23:14, 8 December 2024
Not to be confused with Judaism and warfare or Judaism and peace.
Judaism's doctrines and texts have sometimes been associated with violence or anti-violence. Laws requiring the eradication of evil, sometimes using violent means, exist in the Jewish tradition. However, Judaism also contains peaceful texts and doctrines. There is often a juxtaposition of Judaic law and theology to violence and nonviolence by groups and individuals. Attitudes and laws towards both peace and violence exist within the Jewish tradition. Throughout history, Judaism's religious texts or precepts have been used to promote as well as oppose violence.
Normative Judaism
See also: Judaism and peaceNormative Judaism is not pacifist and violence is condoned in the service of self-defence. J. Patout Burns asserts that Jewish tradition clearly posits the principle of minimization of violence. This principle can be stated as "(wherever) Jewish law allows violence to keep an evil from occurring, it mandates that the minimal amount of violence be used to accomplish one's goal." Notwithstanding the inherent friction associated with the various Jewish religious movements in the state of Israel all vying for official recognition, in 1997 Avi Shafran of the Agudath Israel of America pushed back on assertions made by Ismar Schorsch that the State's elevation of Rabbinic Judaism as the sole arbiter over personal status issues would inevitably lead to violence. Sure enough, in a May 2022 incident which took place at the Western Wall, Orthodox Jewish seminarians waving World Zionist Organization flags, whose delegation was organized by the World Shas Movement and Eretz Hakodesh—an American affiliate of United Torah Judaism—jeered at, drowned out with whistles and spat upon members of the Women of the Wall group over religious and ideological differences.
Nonviolence
Similar to the world's other major religions, Judaism's religious texts endorse compassion and peace. The Hebrew Bible contains the well-known commandment to "love thy neighbor as thyself". According to the 1937 Columbus Platform of Reform Judaism, "Judaism, from the days of the prophets, has proclaimed to mankind the ideal of universal peace, striving for spiritual and physical disarmament of all nations. Judaism rejects violence and relies upon moral education, love and sympathy."
The philosophy of nonviolence has roots in Judaism, going back to the Jerusalem Talmud of the middle 3rd century. While absolute nonviolence is not a requirement of Judaism, the religion so sharply restricts the use of violence, that nonviolence often becomes the only way to fulfilling a life of truth, justice and peace, which Judaism considers to be the three tools for the preservation of the world.
Warfare
Main articles: Judaism and warfare and Jewish military historyThe biblical narrative about the conquest of Canaan, and the commands related to it, have had a deep influence on Jewish as well as Western culture. Throughout Jewish history, mainstream Jewish traditions have considered these texts purely historical or highly conditioned, and in any event, they are not considered relevant to later times.
The Second Temple period experienced a surge in militarism and violence which was aimed at curbing the encroachment of Greco-Roman and Hellenistic Jewish influences in Judea. Groups such as the Maccabees the Zealots, the Sicarii at the Siege of Masada, and later the Bar Kochba revolt, all derived their power from the biblical narrative of Hebrew conquest and hegemony over the Land of Israel, sometimes garnering support of the rabbis, and at other times their ambivalence.
In modern times, the early history of Zionism saw the emergence of the Brit Shalom organization (lit. 'Covenant of Peace'). Deriving inspiration from the writings of Ahad Ha'am, its members sought to prod the nascent Zionist movement into a direction of peaceful coexistence with the Arabs in Palestine in a bi-national state. These ideas eventually fell out of favor as Zionist militias employing violence began to emerge as a response to the 1921 Jaffa riots and the subsequent Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Since then, warfare which has been conducted by the State of Israel is governed by Israeli law and regulation, which includes a purity of arms code that is based in part on Jewish tradition; the 1992 IDF Code of Conduct combines international law, Israeli law, Jewish heritage and the IDF's own traditional ethical code. However, tension between actions of the Israeli government on the one hand, and Jewish traditions and halakha (Jewish law) on the conduct of war on the other, have caused controversy within Israel and have provided a basis for criticism of Israel. Some strains of radical Zionism promote aggressive war and justify them with biblical texts.
Forced conversion
Forced conversions occurred under the Hasmonean kingdom. The Idumaens were forced to convert to Judaism, either by threats of exile, or threats of death, depending on the source.
In Eusebíus, Christianity, and Judaism Harold W. Attridge claims that "there is reason to think that Josephus' account of their conversion is substantially accurate." He also writes, "That these were not isolated instances but that forced conversion was a national policy is clear from the fact that Alexander Jannaeus (c. 80 BCE) demolished the city of Pella in Moab, 'because the inhabitants would not agree to adopt the national custom of the Jews.'" Josephus, Antiquities. 13.15.4.
Maurice Sartre has written of the "policy of forced Judaization adopted by Hyrcanos, Aristobulus I and Jannaeus", who offered "the conquered peoples a choice between expulsion or conversion".
William Horbury has written that "The evidence is best explained by postulating that an existing small Jewish population in Lower Galilee was massively expanded by the forced conversion in c. 104 BCE of their Gentile neighbours in the north."
Kingdom of Himyar
See also: Himyarite_Kingdom § Jewish_monarchyAfter the conversion of the kingdom of Himyar in the late 4th century to Judaism, two episodes of "coercion and brutality" by Himyar Jewish kings took place during the fifth and early sixth centuries. In an early example of persecution of Christians, thirty-nine Christians were martyred in the third quarter of the fifth century, and a massacre of Christians took place in 523. The Yemeni Jewish Himyar tribe, led by King Dhu Nuwashad, offered Christian residents of a village in Arabia the choice between conversion to Judaism or death, and 20,000 Christians were massacred. Inscriptions show the great pride he expressed after massacring more than 22,000 Christians in Zafar and Najran.
Retribution and punishments
An eye for an eye
Main article: eye for an eyeWhile the principle of lex talionis ("an eye for an eye") is clearly echoed in the Bible, in Judaism it is not literally applied, and was interpreted to provide a basis for financial compensation for injuries. Pasachoff and Littman point to the reinterpretation of the lex talionis as an example of the ability of Pharisaic Judaism to "adapt to changing social and intellectual ideas." Stephen Wylen asserts that the lex talionis is "proof of the unique value of each individual" and that it teaches "equality of all human beings for law."
Capital and corporal punishment
Main article: Capital and corporal punishment (Judaism)While the Bible and Talmud specify many violent punishments, including death by stoning, decapitation, burning, and strangulation for some crimes, these punishments were substantially modified during the Rabbinic era, primarily by adding additional requirements for conviction. The Mishnah states that a sanhedrin that executes one person in seven years – or seventy years, according to Eleazar ben Azariah – is considered bloodthirsty. During the Late Antiquity, the tendency of not applying the death penalty at all became predominant in Jewish courts. According to Talmudic law, the competence to apply capital punishment ceased with the destruction of the Second Temple. In practice, where medieval Jewish courts had the power to pass and execute death sentences, they continued to do so for particularly grave offenses, although not necessarily the ones defined by the law. Although it was recognized that the use of capital punishment in the post-Second Temple era went beyond the biblical warrant, the Rabbis who supported it believed that it could be justified by other considerations of Jewish law. Whether Jewish communities ever practiced capital punishment according to rabbinical law and whether the Rabbis of the Talmudic era ever supported its use even in theory has been a subject of historical and ideological debate. The 12th-century Jewish legal scholar Maimonides stated that "It is better and more satisfactory to acquit a thousand guilty persons than to put a single innocent one to death." The position of Jewish Law on capital punishment often formed the basis of deliberations by Israel's Supreme Court. It has been carried out by Israel's judicial system only once, in the case of Adolf Eichmann.
Purim and the Book of Esther
The Book of Esther, one of the books of the Jewish Bible, is a story of palace intrigue centered on a plot to kill all Jews which was thwarted by Esther, a Jewish queen of Persia. Instead of being victims, the Jews killed "all the people who wanted to kill them." The king gave the Jews the ability to defend themselves against their enemies who tried to kill them, numbering 75,000 (Esther 9:16) including Haman, an Amalekite that led the plot to kill the Jews. The annual Purim festival celebrates this event, and includes the recitation of the biblical instruction to "blot out the remembrance of Amalek". Scholars – including Ian Lustick, Marc Gopin, and Steven Bayme – state that the violence described in the Book of Esther has inspired and incited violent acts and violent attitudes in the post-biblical era, continuing into modern times, often centered on the festival of Purim.
Other scholars, including Jerome Auerbach, state that evidence for Jewish violence on Purim through the centuries is "exceedingly meager", including occasional episodes of stone throwing, the spilling of rancid oil on a Jewish convert, and a total of three recorded Purim deaths inflicted by Jews in a span of more than 1,000 years. In a review of historian Elliot Horowitz's book Reckless rites: Purim and the legacy of Jewish violence, Hillel Halkin pointed out that the incidences of Jewish violence against non-Jews through the centuries are extraordinarily few in number and that the connection between them and Purim is tenuous.
Rabbi Arthur Waskow and historian Elliot Horowitz state that Baruch Goldstein, perpetrator of the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre, may have been motivated by the Book of Esther, because the massacre was carried out on the day of Purim but other scholars point out that the association with Purim is circumstantial because Goldstein never explicitly made such a connection.
Modern acts of religiously motivated violence
The neutrality of this section is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (October 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Cases
In the context of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, the motives for acts of violence which have been committed against Palestinians by Religious Jews in the West Bank are complex and varied according to Weisburg. While religious motivations for these acts of violence have been documented, the use of non-defensive violence is outside of mainstream Judaism.
Abraham Isaac Kook (1865–1935), the Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Mandate Palestine, stated that the Jewish people's settlement of the land should only proceed by peaceful means. Contemporary settler movements follow Kook's son Tzvi Yehuda Kook (1891–1982), who also refused to advocate an aggressive conquest of the Land of Israel. Critics claim that Gush Emunim and followers of Tzvi Yehuda Kook advocate violence based on Judaism's religious precepts. Ian Lustick, Benny Morris, and Nur Masalha assert that radical Zionist leaders relied on religious doctrines for justification for the violent treatment of Arabs in Palestine, citing examples where pre-state Jewish militia used verses from the Bible to justify their violent acts, which included expulsions and massacres such as the one at Deir Yassin.
After Baruch Goldstein carried out the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre in 1994, his actions were widely interpreted as being based on the radical Zionist ideology of the Kach movement, and they were condemned as such by mainstream religious and secular Jews but they were praised by a number of radical Zionists. Dov Lior, Chief Rabbi of Hebron and Kiryat Arba in the southern West Bank and head of the "Council of Rabbis of Judea and Samaria" has made speeches legitimizing the killing of non-Jews and praising Goldstein as a saint and martyr. Lior also said "a thousand non-Jewish lives are not worth a Jew's fingernail" according to journalists. Lior publicly gave permission to spill blood of Arab persons and has publicly supported extreme right-wing terrorists of Jewish faith.
This section may contain information not important or relevant to the article's subject. Please help improve this section. (September 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Following an arson incident in 2010, in which a mosque in Yasuf village was desecrated, apparently by settlers from the nearby Gush Etzion settlement bloc, the Chief Ashkenazi Rabbi Yona Metzger condemned the attack and he also likened the arson to Kristallnacht, he said: "This is how the Holocaust began, the tragedy of the Jewish people of Europe." Rabbi Menachem Froman, a well-known peace activist, visited the mosque and replaced the burnt Koran with new copies. The rabbi stated: "This visit is to say that although there are people who oppose peace, he who opposes peace is opposed to God" and "Jewish law also prohibits damaging a holy place." He also remarked that arson in a mosque is an attempt to sow hatred between Jews and Arabs.
According to Haaretz, in July 2010, Yitzhak Shapira who heads Dorshei Yihudcha yeshiva in the West Bank settlement of Yitzhar, was arrested by Israeli police based on suspicion that he had written a book that encourages Jews to kill non-Jews. The book, The King's Torah, (Torat HaMelech) claims that, under the Torah and Jewish Law, the killing of Gentiles is legal and in some cases, the killing of the babies of enemies is also legal. Later in August 2010, police arrested rabbi Yosef Elitzur-Hershkowitz – co-author of Shapira's book – on the suspicion of incitement to racial violence, possession of a racist text, and possession of material that incites to violence. While the book has been endorsed by radical Zionist leaders including Dov Lior and Yaakov Yosef, it has been widely condemned by mainstream secular and religious Jews. Rabbi Hayim David HaLevi stated that in modern times no one matches the biblical definition of an idolater, and therefore ruled that Jews in Israel have a moral responsibility to treat all citizens with the highest standards of humanity.
Assassinations
On November 7, 1938, a young Polish Jew named Herschel Grynszpan attacked and shot German diplomat Ernst vom Rath in the German embassy in Paris five times, mortally wounding him with bullets to the spleen, stomach and pancreas. The attack occurred against the backdrop of the racial policy of Nazi Germany, which led to Grynszpan's family, together with more than 12,000 Polish-born Jews, being expelled by the Nazi government from Germany to Poland in the so-called Polenaktion on October 28, 1938. Grynszpan, trying to pass himself off as a spy, asked if he could see "His Excellency, the ambassador" to hand over the "most important document" he claimed to have. Instead, according to the French police account, he shouted right before pulling out his gun: "You're a filthy boche! In the name of 12,000 persecuted Jews, here is the document!" At his trial, Grynszpan wanted to use the "Jewish avenger" defense successfully used by Sholem Schwarzbard at his trial in 1927, but Grynszpan's French lawyer Vincent de Moro-Giafferi pursued a defense based on Rath being a homosexual who tried to seduce Grynszpan, an approach which succeeded in delaying the trial indefinitely. Jewish organizations were horrified by Grynszpan's action. The World Jewish Congress "deplored the fatal shooting of an official of the German Embassy by a young Polish Jew of seventeen", but "protested energetically against the violent attacks in the German press against the whole of Judaism because of this act" and "reprisals taken against the German Jews". In France, the Alliance Israélite Universelle "rejected all forms of violence, regardless of author or victim" but "indignantly protested against the barbarous treatment inflicted on an entire innocent population."
The assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin by Yigal Amir was motivated by Amir's personal political views and his understanding of Judaism's religious law of moiser (the duty to eliminate a Jew who intends to turn another Jew over to non-Jewish authorities, thus putting a Jew's life in danger) and rodef (a bystander can kill a person who is pursuing another person in an attempt to murder him or her if he or she cannot be stopped in other ways). Amir's interpretation has been described as "a gross distortion of Jewish law and tradition" and the mainstream Jewish view is that Rabin's assassin had no Halakhic basis to shoot Prime Minister Rabin.
Extremist organizations
Main article: Jewish extremist terrorismIn the course of Jewish history, some individuals and organizations have endorsed or advocated violence based on their interpretations of Jewish religious principles. Such instances of religious violence are considered extremist aberrations of Judaism by adherents of mainstream Judaism, and as a result, they are not considered representative of the tenets of Judaism.
- Kach (defunct) and Kahane Chai
- Gush Emunim Underground (defunct): formed by members of Gush Emunim.
- Brit HaKanaim (defunct): an organisation operating in Israel from 1950 to 1953 with the objective of imposing Jewish religious law in the country and establishing a Halakhic state.
- The Jewish Defense League (JDL): founded in 1969 by Rabbi Meir Kahane in New York City, with the declared purpose of protecting Jews from harassment and antisemitism. FBI statistics show that, from 1980 to 1985, 15 terrorist attacks were attempted in the U.S. by members of the JDL. The FBI's Mary Doran described the JDL in 2004 Congressional testimony as "a proscribed terrorist group". The National Consortium for the Study of Terror and Responses to Terrorism states that, during the JDL's first two decades of activity, it was an "active terrorist organization". Kahanist groups are banned in Israel.
General claims
Some critics of religion such as Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer argue that all monotheistic religions are inherently violent. For example, Nelson-Pallmeyer writes that "Judaism, Christianity and Islam will continue to contribute to the destruction of the world until and unless each challenges violence in 'sacred texts' and until each affirms nonviolent, including the nonviolent power of God."
Bruce Feiler writes of ancient history that "Jews and Christians who smugly console themselves that Islam is the only violent religion are willfully ignoring their past. Nowhere is the struggle between faith and violence described more vividly, and with more stomach-turning details of ruthlessness, than in the Hebrew Bible". Similarly, Burggraeve and Vervenne describe the Old Testament as full of violence and evidence of both a violent society and a violent god. They write that, "n numerous Old Testament texts the power and glory of Israel's God is described in the language of violence." They assert that more than one thousand passages refer to YHWH as acting violently or supporting the violence of humans and that more than one hundred passages involve divine commands to kill humans.
Supersessionist Christian churches and theologians argue that Judaism is a violent religion and they also argue that the god of Israel is a violent god, while Christianity is a religion of peace and they also argue that the god of Christianity is one that only expresses love. While this point of view has been commonly held throughout the history of Christianity and while it currently remains a common assumption among contemporary Christians, it has been rejected by mainstream Christian theologians and denominations since the Holocaust.
See also
- Anti-Zionism
- Criticism of the Bible
- Criticism of Israel
- Criticism of Judaism
- History of Israel
- Jewish ethics
- Jewish fascism
- Jewish fundamentalism
- Jewish views on religious pluralism
- Martyrdom in Judaism
- Racism in Israel
- Racism in Jewish communities
- Christian pacifism
- Pacifism in Islam
- Racial antisemitism
- Historical race concepts
- Khazar hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancestry
- Scientific racism
- Social Darwinism
- Völkisch movement
- Nazi eugenics
- Nazi racial theories
- Racial policy of Nazi Germany
- Anti-Jewish legislation in pre-war Nazi Germany
- Final Solution
- New Order (Nazism)
- Italian fascism and racism
- Manifesto of Race
- Italian racial laws
- History of the Jews during World War II
- Religious antisemitism
- Religious terrorism
- Stochastic terrorism
- Clerical fascism
- Fundamentalism
- Religious nationalism
- Religious violence
- Sectarian violence
References
- ^ Fighting the War and the Peace: Battlefield Ethics, Peace Talks, Treaties, and Pacifism in the Jewish Tradition. Michael J. Broyde, 1998, p. 1
- ^ *Reuven Firestone (2004), "Judaism on Violence and Reconciliation: An examination of key sources" in Beyond violence: religious sources of social transformation in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Fordham Univ Press, 2004, pp. 77, 81.
- Goldsmith (Ed.), Emanuel S. (1991). Dynamic Judaism: the essential writings of Mordecai M. Kaplan. Fordham Univ Press. p. 181. ISBN 0-8232-1310-2.
- Spero, Shubert (1983). Morality, halakha, and the Jewish tradition. KTAV Publishing House, Inc. pp. 137–318. ISBN 0-87068-727-1.
- Carl. S. Ehrlich (1999) "Joshua, Judaism, and Genocide", in Jewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century, Judit Targarona Borrás, Ángel Sáenz-Badillos (Eds). 1999, Brill.
- ^ Horowitz, Elliott S. (2006). Reckless rites: Purim and the legacy of Jewish violence. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-12491-4.
- ^ Stern, Jessica (2004). Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill, Jessica Stern. HarperCollins. ISBN 0-06-050533-8.
- ^ The Columbus Platform: The Guiding Principles of Reform Judaism, 1937
- "The Co-existence of Violence and Non-Violence in Judaism". Retrieved 2010-12-09.
- Burns, J. Patout (1996). War and its discontents: pacifism and quietism in the Abrahamic traditions. Georgetown University Press. p. 18.
- ^ Halacha File: The Halacha of Rodef and the Rabin Shooting Archived 2005-04-27 at the Wayback Machine. Koltorah.org (2004-11-20). Retrieved on 2010-10-27.
- Niebuhr, Gustav (April 17, 1997) "Jewish Leader Fires Back in Dispute Control of Religious Life in Israel Disputed; Rabbi Warns of Possible Violence" ProQuest 260532996 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved April 18, 2024. (subscription required)
- Maltz, Judy (May 16, 2022) "Recent Western Wall Clashes Expose a Schism in World Zionist Politics" ProQuest 2664895284 Haaretz. Retrieved April 18, 2024. (subscription required)
- Sandra L. Bloom, Michael Reichert, Bearing witness: violence and collective responsibility. Routledge, 1998. ISBN 978-0789004789
- Lemche, Niels Peter, The Old Testament between theology and history: a critical survey, Westminster John Knox Press, 2008, pp. 315–316:"The story of the 'morally supreme people' that defeats and exterminates another, inferior, nation was part of the ideological baggage of European imperialists and colonizers throughout the nineteenth century. It was also carried by European Jews who,... migrated to Palestine to inherit their ancestral country … In this modern version of the biblical narrative, the Palestinian population turned into 'Canaanites', supposed to be morally inferior to the Jews, and of course the Arabs were never considered their equals … The Bible was the instrument used to suppress the enemy".
- Greenberg, Moshe, "On the Political User of the Bible in Modern Israel: An Engaged Critique", in Pomegranates and golden bells: studies in biblical, Jewish, and Near Eastern ritual, law, and literature, Eisenbrauns, 1995, pp. 467–469:
No "national" commandment such as that of "conquest and settling the land" occurs in any of these summaries … introduces a distinction that Scripture does not recognize; nowhere are the obligations referred to in the summaries contingent on the achievement of the land-taking or the destruction of Israel's enemies. To suppose that they may be set aside or suspended for the accomplishment of national ends is a leap far beyond scripture.... The injunctions to take the land are embedded in narrative and give the appearance of being addressed to a specific generation, like the commandment to annihilate or expel the natives of Canaan, which refers specifically to the seven Canaanite nations... Now, had there been any inclination to generalize the law , it would have been easy for the talmudic sages to . But in fact the sages left the ancient herem law as they found it: applying to seven extinct nations.
- Johnson, 1987. Quote: " saw themselves as reliving the Book of Joshua, reconquering the Promised Land from the pagans." (p. 106)
- Johnson, 1987. Quote: "Abundant evidence of services in the fort's synagogue and parts of fourteen scrolls of Biblical, sectarian and apocryphal books indicate that this was a G-d fearing garrison of militants, profoundly influenced by the terrible power of Jewish literature." (p. 140)
- Johnson, 1987. Quote: "A rabbinic source says was recognized as Messiah by the greatest scholar of the age, the rabbi Akiva ben Joseph." (p. 141)
- Johnson, 1987. Quote: "From the fragments of evidence we have, it looks as if Simon got little support from learned Jews and in the end lost what he had...The men of the rebellion were orthodox Jews who took great trouble, despite desperate circumstances, to observe the Mosaic law...But there is no evidence that Simon regarded himself as a Messiah, the anointed one or in any way a spiritual leader...He was in every respect a secular ruler, a nasi as he calls himself in his letters, harsh, practical, unbending, ruthless...The later rabbinic legends woven around the 'Son of a Star' seem to have no basis in fact. Simon was more of a prototype for a modern Zionist fighter: unromantic and professional, a man who lived and died a guerrilla and nationalist." (p. 142)
- Asa-el, Amotz (5 September 2017) "Genius: Spiritual Zionism's Great Opportunity", The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 31 January 2024.
- Kessler, Oren (1 May 2021) 1921 Jaffa Riots 100 Years On: Mandatory Palestine's 1st 'Mass Casualty' Attack", The Times of Israel. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
- "Ethics – The IDF Spirit". IDF Spokesperson's Unit. Archived from the original on 31 August 2009. Retrieved 10 June 2010.
- Chomsky, Noam (1999). Fateful triangle: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinians (revised 2nd ed.). South End Press. pp. 153–154. ISBN 0-89608-601-1.
- Kravitz, Leonard, "What is Crime?", in Crime and punishment in Jewish law: essays and responses, Editors Walter Jacob, Moshe Zemer Berghahn Books, 1999, p. 31. Quote:
Sin has changed ; crime has changed. We bring a different sensibility to our reading of the sacred texts of the past, even the Torah. There are passages in it which to our modern minds command crimes, the kind of crimes which our age would call "crimes against humanity"... I think of the problematic section in the Mattot which contains the commandment to exact revenge against the Midianites by slaying every male and every female old enough to engage in sexual intercourse.... I used to think that were they suddenly to appear, no Jew would be willing to carry out such a commandment. Then Baruch Goldstein appeared on the scene, and he was followed by Yigal Amir and now I am not sure.... I find the commandment to commit genocide against the Midianite unacceptable. To accept the commandment to do the same to "the Hittites, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Peruzzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites" seems to me to make permissible the Holocaust, the attempted genocide of the Jewish people.
- Lustick, Ian, For the land and the Lord: Jewish fundamentalism in Israel, Council on Foreign Relations, 1988.
- Flavius Josephus Antiquities 13.257–258
- Aristobulus
- Harold W. Attridge, Gōhei Hata (eds.). Eusebius, Christianity, and Judaism. Wayne State University Press, 1992: p. 387.
- Maurice Sartre. The Middle East Under Rome. Harvard University Press, 2005: p. 15.
- William Horbury. The Cambridge History of Judaism 2 Part Set: Volume 3, The Early Roman Period Cambridge University Press, 1999: p. 599.
- Bowersock 2013, p. 83.
- ^ Bowersock 2013, p. 85.
- "Historians back BBC over Jewish massacre claim". The Jewish Chronicle. 2009-09-18. Retrieved 2014-06-06.
- Jacques Ryckmans, La persécution des chrétiens himyarites au sixième siècle Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Inst. in het Nabije Oosten, 1956 pp. 1–24.
- Lewis, Harry Samuel (1915). Liberal Judaism and social service. Bloch Pub. Co. p. 37.
Judaism lex talionis.
- Kalimi, Isaac; Haas, Peter J. (2006). Biblical interpretation in Judaism and Christianity. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-567-02682-8.
- Pasachoff, Naomi E.; Littman, Robert J. (2005). A concise history of the Jewish people. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-7425-4366-9.
- Wylen, Stephen M. (2005). The seventy faces of Torah: the Jewish way of reading the Sacred Scriptures. Paulist Press. p. 20. ISBN 978-0-8091-4179-1.
-
- Sanhedrin 11:1 specifies strangulation
- Neusner, Jacob, Comparing religions through law: Judaism and Islam, pp. 107–111
- ^ Goldstein, Warren (2006). Defending the human spirit: Jewish law's vision for a moral society. Feldheim Publishers. p. 269. ISBN 978-1-58330-732-8. Retrieved 22 October 2010.
- Louis Isaac Rabinowitz (2008). "Capital Punishment. In Practice in the Talmud". Encyclopedia Judaica. The Gale Group.
Similarly, the passage in Mishnah Makkot 1:10: "A Sanhedrin that puts a man to death once in seven years is called a murderous one. R. Eleazar ben Azariah says 'Or even once in 70 years.' R. Tarfon and R. Akiva said, 'If we had been in the Sanhedrin no death sentence would ever have been passed'; Rabban Simeon b. Gamaliel said: 'If so, they would have multiplied murderers in Israel.'
- Menachem Elon (2008). "Capital Punishment. In the State of Israel". Encyclopedia Judaica. The Gale Group.
This refers to the statement in the Mishnah (Mak. 1:10; Mak. 7a) that a Sanhedrin that kills (gives the death penalty) once in seven years (R. Eleazer b. Azariah said: once in 70 years) is called "bloody" (ḥovlanit, the term "ḥovel" generally implying a type of injury in which there is blood).
- Glen Warren Bowersock; Peter Brown; Oleg Grabar (1999). Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World. Harvard University Press. p. 400. ISBN 978-0-674-51173-6.
- ^ Haim Hermann Cohn (2008). "Capital Punishment. Talmudic Law". Encyclopedia Judaica. The Gale Group.
- Dale S. Recinella (2015). The Biblical Truth about America's Death Penalty. Northeastern University Press. p. 93. ISBN 978-1-55553-862-0.
- ^ Menachem Elon (2008). "Capital Punishment. In the State of Israel". Encyclopedia Judaica. The Gale Group.
- Jacobs, Jill (2009). There Shall Be No Needy: Pursuing Social Justice Through Jewish Law & Tradition. Woodstock, Vt: Jewish Lights. p. 200. ISBN 978-1-58023-425-2.
- Free Bible Version...
- Megilat Esther – the Jewish Magazine
- Lustick, Ian, For the land and the Lord: Jewish fundamentalism in Israel, Council on Foreign Relations, 1988. Quote: "Of decisive importance to Jewish fundamentalists is their belief that contemporary political developments are part of an unfolding cosmic drama that will determine, depending on the willingness of Jews to act decisively on its behalf, whether God's redemption of his people Israel, and of the whole world, will or will not soon reach its completion…. The massacre in the Hebron mosque on the Jewish holiday of Purim is a tragic, but telling, example. Preceded by a rash of killings of Jewish settlers by Muslim fundamentalists … it is not in the least a coincidence that the massacre took place on the Jewish holiday of Purim. For most Jews Purim means listening to .. the Book of Esther .. .It is an occasion for merry-making, games, charity and the exchange of gifts. But as Goldstein sat reading that same book on Purim even in 1994, it is almost certain he identified Yasir Arafat with Haman, the arch-enemy of the Jews of ancient Persia, and the killing of Jewish settlers over the previous months with Haman's murderous designs. Accordingly, he focused on often-ignored verses at the end of the book which, for Jewish fundamentalists, capture the essence of the story under contemporary circumstances and contain a divine imperative to act. According to the Book of Esther the Jews are saved by the king who reverses Haman's evil decree and declares instead that Jews may do unto their enemies what their enemies had intended to do unto them 'to stand up for themselves, to destroy, to slay, and to annihilate any armed force of any people or province that might assault them, with their little ones and women' (Esther 8:11) ... By mowing down Arabs he believed wanted to kill Jews, Goldstein was re-enacting part of the Purim story." (pp. ix–xi.)
- Quotes from Horowitz 2006, p. 16: "This book deals not only with the theme of Amalek and responses – Christian as well as Jewish – to the book of Esther over the centuries, but also with Jewish violence connected with the holiday of Purim, from the early fifth century to the late twentieth." :p. 19: "The first is devoted ... to the book of Esther … Was it a book that promoted cruel vengeance ...? Since according to Jewish law the Amalekites, including women and children, had to be utterly destroyed, thinking about Amalek involved … thinking about the possibilities of, and justifications for, Jewish violence. one specific form of Jewish violence over many centuries - the descration of the cross and other Christian images…. devoted to violence against Christians, sometimes within the context of the Purim festiviy, in the 5th–7th centuries. Chapter 9 carries the subject of Purim violence into the medieval and early modern Europe, especially against the background of the often violent rites of Carnival."
- Bayme, Steven, "Saddam, Haman, and Amalek", in Jewish arguments and counterarguments: essays and addresses, KTAV Publishing House, Inc., 2002: Quote: "For many centuries Purim has been a source of both joy and embarrassment for Jews ... Still others have challenged the doctrine of violence associated with the holiday… Martin Luther, for one, accused the Jews of bloodthirsty and vengeful spirit in the Book of Esther… reflect the close association of Purim with the biblical doctrine of war against the Amalek. The theme of Jewish violence against Haman and his supporters, the doctrine of Amalek, has caused Jews the greatest discomfort with the Book of Esther and the holiday with which it is associated ... Judaism teaches that violence is justified under certain circumstances – particularly defense against aggression ... Amalek, the rabbis argue, is the eternally irreconcilable enemy who represents a value system that promotes murder ... Herein lies the enduring relevance of Purim. Aggression must be stopped and evil eliminated ... The meaning of Purim is relevant to the question of the war in the Persian Gulf today ... unprovoked Scud missile attacks against entirely civilian targets in Israel are reminiscent of Amaleks's treacherous attacks upon the ... Israelites...." (pp. 75–80)
- The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha, Augmented Third Edition Michael David Coogan (Ed). Quote:"Jews and Christians have also been troubled by the story's enthusiastic account of the violence of the Jewish community's response to their enemies, which involved not only self defense but also the slaughter of women and children, including the sons of Haman. The bloodthirsty language, however, derives from the story's symmetric pattern of reversals ..." (p. 708)
- Gopin, Marc, Between Eden and Armageddon: the future of world religions, violence, and peacemaking, Oxford University Press US, 2000. Quote : "I have known many Orthodox rabbis, for example, who would be happy to ensure that a holiday such as Purim, with its obligatory reading of the Book of Esther, which cluminates with the slaughter of the people – including their children – who tried to exterminate the Jewish people, would never be used to justify the killing of anyone today. They certainly are deeply ashamed by Baruch Goldstein's mass murder at the Hebron mosque, which was inspired in part by Purim ... They can and do give moralistic sermons, and they can and do interpret the story in less violent terms ... The hermeneutic give and take of Purim is but one example of the way in which a deeply embedded tradition will not disappear even when many people reject its implicit message of violence ... It is not likely in the current climate of religious revivalism, but it is possible that the violence of the story could be overshadowed with time by the numerous benevolent characteristics of the holiday, such as aiding the poor ... Jewish empowerment allows for a new hermeneutic that could centralize the violence of the story. If the political situation were to rapidly deteriorate, it is conceivable that Purim could become for radical Jews what Ramadan has become for radical Muslims in Algeria, a killing season ... Even the most radically pacifist Jews that I know do not eliminate this holiday, although they do not really know what to do with sacralized violence yet, and are now only evolving a spiritual and ritual reworking of traumatic and violent episodes." (pp. 52–53)
- Nirenberg, David, Communities of violence: persecution of minorities in the Middle Ages, Princeton University Press, 1998. Quote:"There is evidence … that Jews could use ritual violence to criticize the Christians in whose lands they dwelled An obvious example is Purim, on which see E. Horowitz, The Rite to Be Reckless ..; and for a late medieval Iberian example, S. Levy, "Notas sobre el 'Purrim de Zaragoza", Anuario do Filologia 5 (1979): 203–217. (p. 220)
- Gonen, Jay Y., Yahweh versus Yahweh: the enigma of Jewish history, Univ of Wisconsin Press, 2005. Quote :"In 1994, on Purim day, Jewish physician Baruch Goldstein burst into an Arab Mosque in Hebron … and sprayed Arab worshipers who were kneeling in prayer with bullets from an automatic weapon. Twenty-nine Palestinians were killed before the enraged crowd tore him to pieces. It was a shameful day in Jewish history, the memory of which should be injected into all future Purim celebrations as a sober reminder of the potential barbarism that is hidden within the old myths of vengeance wrought by the Sons of Israel upon their enemies…. memorial plaque affirmed that 'he was murdered for the sanctification of the Name…'. In this manipulative phrasing the old Jewish ethos of martyrdom, the sanctification of the Name, was given new meaning - messianic, activist, and murderous…. Purim celebrations in Israel in 2001 were again blotted by ugly incidents. As Jewish hotheadedness increased … harassments of Palestinians took place. During Purim it was a mitzvah, or good deed, to sock it to the modern Amalekites… In Jerusalem dozens of Jews gathered in the Sabath Square, pelted cars with stones, tried to set a minibus on fire, and threw various objects at residents of the Arab quarter. In Zion Gate Jews beat up Palestinians, calling them 'dirty Arabs' and 'terrorists'. One drunken Jew who wounded an Arab in the eye subsequently attacked the police as he was arrested. There was no loss of life in these incidents, but this cannot be said about the Baruch Goldstein precedence of violence that was deliberately injected into the Purim ritual. And if it has become a Purim commandment to drink and then attack Arabs, how should the Arabs react?" (pp. 63–64)
- Robins, Robert S. and Post, Jerrold M., Political paranoia: the psychopolitics of hatred, Yale University Press, 1997. Quote: "On February 25, 1994, when Dr. Baruch Goldstein walked into the mosque atop the Tomb of the patriarchs in Hebron and fired his automatic weapon into the worshipping Muslims, killing or wounding at least 130 of them … Also on the night before ... Goldstein had read … from the Book of Esther which tells the story of the Jewish festival of Purim ... Purim friend explained 'is a holiday to kill the people who are trying to kill the Jews'" ... For most Jews Purim is a joyous celebration of deliverance. But for some it is a celebration of violence, commemorating an uprising of the Jews against their enemies, a day of righteous wrath when 'the Jews smote all their enemies with the stroke of the sword and with slaughter and destruction, and did what they would unto them that hated them' (Esther 9:1)." (pp. 162–163)
- Hunter, Alastair G. "Denominating Amalek: Racist stereotyping in the Bible and the Justification of Discrimination" in Sanctified aggression: legacies of biblical and post biblical vocabularies, Jonneke Bekkenkamp, Yvonne Sherwood (Eds), Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003. Quote: Hunter quotes Arthur Waskow on p. 103: "on hearing of the murderous attack by Baruch Goldstein": "I know at once that this is no isolated crazy, this 'Baruch Goldstein' who has murdered forty of my cousins. I know at once, he has decided on this Purim to 'blot out the memory of the Amalek' not with a noise maker but with a machine gun… So then, in our generation, for some Jews the Palestinians become Amalek."
- Boustan, Ra'anan S., Violence, Scripture, and Textual Practice in Early Judaism and Christianity, Brill, 2010. Quote: "... Christians had grown apprehensive at what they perceived, not without reason, as the ill-will that Jews harbored against the Christian Church… Such concerns are already reflected in the legislation passed in 408 CE against the alleged Jewish practice of burning Haman in effigy on 'a form made to resemble the sainted cross' during the festival of Purim, which the authorities suspected was a gesture of ridicule aimed at the Savior himself…. And, indeed, a verse parody in Jewish Aramaic ... which features Jesus Christ amid a host of Israel's enemies ... justifying the punishment of Haman and bewailing their own cruel fates, may suggest that the dim view of Purim taken by Christian authorities was far from baseless." (p. 218)
- Hebron Jews: memory and conflict in the land of Israel, by Jerold S. Auerbach, p. 137
- "Aside from an alleged 'great slaughter' of local Christians by Galilee Jews after the Persian invasion of Jerusalem in 614 CE, which other scholars believed to be dubious, evidence for repetitive Jewish violence on Purim through the centuries was exceedingly meager: occasional episodes of stone throwing, the spilling of 'rancid oil' on a Jewish convert, mockery of the Christian cross, and a total of three recorded Purim deaths inflicted by Jews in a span of more than 1,000 years…. Then, during the annual Purim parade in Hebron five years later a Jewish settler placed a keffiyah on an effigy of Haman, infuriating local Arabs."
- Abby Wisse Schachter, The Problem with Purim Archived 2011-01-31 at the Wayback Machine, February 2010, Commentary Magazine
- Quote from Horowitz 2006 p. 4: "On Dr. Baruch Goldstein .. opened fire, with his army-issued semi-automatic rifle, on dozens of Muslims who were praying inside the mosque at the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron, killing twenty nine. At the time a Hebrew version of an article about the history of Purim violence … as I saw the raucous celebrations in the center of Jerusalem continuing unabated, that there was a clear connection between past Purims and the present one was both exhilarating and disturbing… And the Sabbath before Purim … opens with the command to 'remember what th Amalek did' and concludes with .. the … exhortation to 'blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven'.
- Hunter, Alastair G. "Denominating Amalek: Racist stereotyping in the Bible and the Justification of Discrimination" in Sanctified aggression: legacies of biblical and post biblical vocabularies, Jonneke Bekkenkamp, Yvonne Sherwood (Eds), Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003. Hunter quotes Arthur Waskow on p. 103: "on hearing of the murderous attack by Baruch Goldstein": "I know at once that this is no isolated crazy, this 'Baruch Goldstein' who has murdered forty of my cousins. I know at once, he has decided on this Purim to 'blot out the memory of the Amalek' not with a noise maker but with a machine gun… So then, in our generation, for some Jews the Palestinians become Amalek."
- Gopin, Marc, Between Eden and Armageddon: the future of world religions, violence, and peacemaking, Oxford University Press US, 2000, pp. 52–53.
- New, David S. Holy war: the rise of militant Christian, Jewish, and Islamic fundamentalism, McFarland, 2002, pp. 147–148
- Auerbach, Jerold S, Hebron Jews: memory and conflict in the land of Israel, Rowman & Littlefield, 2009, p. 137
- ^ Daniel Estrin for The Forward and Haaretz Jan. 22, 2010 "The King's Torah: a rabbinic text or a call to terror?"
- Weisburd, Jewish Settler Violence, Penn State Press, 1985, pp. 20–52
- Lustick, Ian, "Israel's Dangerous Fundamentalists", Foreign Policy, 68 (Fall 1987), pp. 118–139
- Tessler, Mark, "Religion and Politics in the Jewish State of Israel", in Religious resurgence and politics in the contemporary world, (Emile Sahliyeh, Ed). SUNY Press, 1990 pp. 263–296.
- Haberman, Clyde (1994-03-01). "West Bank Massacre: The Overview; Rabin Urges the Palestinians To Put Aside Anger and Talk". The New York Times. Retrieved 2010-04-28.
- Rabbi slams Jewish 'hooligans' - Israel News, Ynetnews. Ynetnews.com (1995-06-20). Retrieved on 2010-10-27.
- The ethics of war in Asian civilizations: a comparative perspective By Torkel Brekke, Routledge, 2006, p. 44
- Morris 2008, pp. 126–128.
- ^ Judaism and the ethics of war, Norman Solomon. International Review of the Red Cross. Volume 87 Number 858 June 2005
-
- Weisburd, David (1985). Jewish Settler Violence. Penn State Press. p. 65. ISBN 0-271-02673-1.
- Bruce, Steve (2008). Fundamentalism. Polity. p. 4. ISBN 978-0-7456-4075-4.
- Ehud Sprinzak, "From Messianic Pioneering to Vigilante Terrorism: The Case of the Gush Emunim Underground", in Inside terrorist organizations David C. Rappoport (Ed.), Routledge, 2001. pp. 194–214.
-
- Saleh Abdel Jawad (2007) "Zionist Massacres: the Creation of the Palestinian Refugee Problem in the 1948 War" in Israel and the Palestinian refugees, Eyal Benvenistî, Chaim Gans, Sari Hanafi (Eds.), Springer, p. 78:
- ".. the Zionist movement, which claims to be secular, found it necessary to embrace the idea of 'the promised land' of Old Testament prophecy, to justify the confiscation of land and the expulsion of the Palestinians. For example, the speeches and letter of Chaim Weizman, the secular Zionist leader, are filled with references to the biblical origins of the Jewish claim to Palestine, which he often mixes liberally with more pragmatic and nationalistic claims. By the use of this premise, embraced in 1937, Zionists alleged that the Palestinians were usurpers in the Promised Land, and therefore their expulsion and death was justified. The Jewish-American writer Dan Kurzman, in his book Genesis 1948 … describes the view of one of the Deir Yassin's killers: 'The Sternists followed the instructions of the Bible more rigidly than others. They honored the passage (Exodus 22:2): 'If a thief be found …' This meant, of course, that killing a thief was not really murder. And were not the enemies of Zionism thieves, who wanted to steal from the Jews what God had granted them?'
- Carl. S. Ehrlich (1999) "Joshua, Judaism, and Genocide", in Jewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century, Judit Targarona Borrás, Ángel Sáenz-Badillos (Eds). 1999, Brill. pp. 117–124.
- Rayner, John D. (1997). An Understanding of Judaism. Berghahn Books. p. 57. ISBN 1-57181-971-1.
- Tuman, Joseph S. (2003). Communicating Terror: The Rhetorical Dimensions of Terrorism. Sage Publications. p. 93. ISBN 1-4129-7324-4. Retrieved 2010-03-13.
Although Goldstein did not say anything during his attack to explain his actions it is known that the night before his assault he had attended a service at the Jewish side of the Cave of the Patriarchs where after listening to the traditional reading from the Scroll of Esther, he told others who were there that they should all behave like Esther. The timing of his attack at the same site the next day hardly seems to be the product of happenstance or coincidence. It was the day of Purim. Moreover, although his actions seemed to be the product of a mind that had snapped or become depraved, there did not seem to be any sign that he was suffering from a mental disorder. His actions were deliberate and intentional. Goldstein was troubled by the ongoing peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians in Oslo and he was openly concerned that a Palestinian state was about to be created. His attack on Muslim worshippers at the same site, while Purim coincided with Ramadan, was an attempt to symbolically cast himself in the story as Mordecai. Indeed, that was exactly the way in which his actions were interpreted by other settlers at Kiryat Arba, and in the years to come after 1994, there would be numerous instances in which the settlers would also celebrate Purim by invoking Goldstein's memory and image in a provocative manner.
- "When Fury Rules". Time. March 7, 1994. Archived from the original on April 16, 2009. Retrieved 2010-04-28. (subscription required)
- Settlers remember gunman Goldstein; Hebron riots continue. Avi Issacharoff and Chaim Levinson, Haaretz, 28 February 2010
- Khalid Amayreh (20 May 2004). "Rabbi supports killings in Rafah". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 17 March 2010.
- "The List: The World's Worst Religious Leaders". foreignpolicy.com. April 2008 (original article no longer available online). Copies are cached at Google.com and reproduced on richarddawkins.net Archived 2011-02-28 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 17 March 2010.
- Haaretz, 2010 Aug. 23, "Those Noisy Barbarians, Dov Lior, the Chief Rabbi of Hebron, Doesn't Want Jews to Take on Boogie-Woogie from the Jungle," http://www.haaretz.com/culture/arts-leisure/those-noisy-barbarians-1.309629
- ^ "Does the Torah back burning mosques?" by Rabbi Gideon Sylvester. The Jewish Chronicle Online. 22 October 2010.
- "Palestinian mosque torched in suspected 'price tag' operation by settlers." by Avi Issacharoff. Haaretz.
- "Arsonists torch mosque in West Bank village" by Diaa Hadid. Associated Press.
- ^ "Chief rabbi: Palestinian mosque burning harkens to Kristallnacht" by Anshel Pfeffer. Haaretz.
- "Settlers replace Korans burnt in West Bank mosque attack". Reuters.
- "Board slams West Bank mosque arson". The Jewish Chronicles Online. October 7, 2010.
- "Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira is the alleged author of a book which deems as legal, according to 'Jewish law,' the killing of non-Jews" by Chaim Levinson. Haaretz.
- "Yitzhar rabbi suspected of incitement" by Ben Hartman. Jpost.com.
- "Yitzhar rabbi detained by police". Investigators suspect Elitzur-Hershkowitz of racial incitement by Yaakov Lappin.Jpost.com.
- Alan E. Steinweis (2009). Kristallnacht 1938. Belknap Press. p. 179. ISBN 978-0674036239.
- Giles MacDonogh. 1938: Hitler's Gamble. p. 217.
- Kirsch, Jonathan The Short, Strange Life of Herschel Grynszpan, New York: W.W. Norton, p. 237.
- Prempain, Laurence; Wyler, Manuela. "Kristalnacht 9-19 novembre 1938". Jewishtraces.org (in French). Archived from the original on 26 September 2014. Retrieved 3 April 2014.
- Schwab (1990). p. 41
- Free Judaism and religion in Israel. Free Judaism in association with Milan Press. 1999. p. 47. ISBN 978-965-7111-00-0.
- Rabbi Arthur Waskow, The Shalom Center, 14 November 2005 Rabbinic response: Jewish Law on the Killing of Yitzhak Rabin. Quote: "First of all, the law of the pursuer only applies to a spontaneous act, whereas Yigal Amir planned this assassination for two years. Secondly, the law of the pursuer is only intended to save a potential victim from imminent death. There is absolutely no proof that withdrawing from certain territories will directly lead to the death of any Jews. On the contrary, Prime Minister Rabin, over half the members of the Knesset, and over half the population of Israel believe exactly the opposite - that it will save Jewish lives. Lastly, this law does not refer to elected representatives, for if Yitzhak Rabin was really a pursuer, then so are all his followers and that would mean that Amir should have killed over half the population of Israel! In other words, even according to the law of the pursuer, this act was totally futile and senseless since the peace process will continue."
- Weiss, Steven I. (2010-02-26). "The Ghosts of Purim Past: The holiday's violent beginnings – and what they mean for the Jewish future".
- "Violence and Vengeance: Purim and Good Friday". Dialogika. Council of Centers on Jewish-Christian Relations. 1998-03-28.
- U.S. Dept. of State, Country Reports on Terrorism 2004. April 2005
- U.S. Appeals Court Affirms Designation of Kahane Chai, Kach as Terrorist Groups Washington Report on Middle East Affairs
- Kach, Kahane Chai (Israel, extremists) Council for Foreign Relations, 20 March 2008
- Lustick Archived 2008-12-01 at the Wayback Machine For The Land and The Lord: The Evolution of Gush Emunim, by Ian S. Lustick
- Pedahzur, Ami, and Arie Perliger (2009). Jewish Terrorism in Israel. Columbia University Press. pp. 33–36
- ^ Anti-Defamation League on JDL Archived 2010-04-14 at the Wayback Machine
- Bohn, Michael K. (2004). The Achille Lauro Hijacking: Lessons in the Politics and Prejudice of Terrorism. Brassey's Inc. p. 67. ISBN 1-57488-779-3.
- Federal Bureau of Investigation - Congressional Testimony Archived 2009-03-11 at the Wayback Machine
- "JDL group profile from the National Consortium for the Study of Terror and Responses to Terrorism". Archived from the original on 2010-08-28. Retrieved 2010-10-10.
- Kahane Chai (KACH) Archived 2007-03-06 at the Wayback Machine Public Safety Canada
- Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) U.S. Department of State, 11 October 2005
- Council Decision of 21 December 2005 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2005/848/EC Official Journal of the European Union, 23 December 2005
- Nelson-Pallmeyer, Jack (2005). Is Religion Killing Us?: Violence in the Bible and the Quran. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 136. ISBN 978-0-8264-1779-4.
- Feiler, Bruce S. (2005). Where God was born: a journey by land to the roots of religion. HarperCollins. p. 4. ISBN 978-0-06-082614-7.
- Burggraeve, Roger; Vervenne, Marc (1991). Swords into plowshares: theological reflections on peace. Peeters Publishers. pp. 82, 109. ISBN 978-90-6831-372-7.
- Heft, James, ed. (2004). Beyond violence: religious sources of social transformation in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Fordham University Press. ISBN 978-0-8232-2335-0.
- R. Kendall Soulen. The God of Israel and Christian Theology. Fortress Press (June 11, 1996) ISBN 978-0800628833.
Sources
- Berger, Michael S., "Taming the Beast: Rabbinic Pacification of Second-Century Jewish Nationalism", in Belief and bloodshed: religion and violence across time and tradition, James K. Wellman (Ed.), Rowman & Littlefield, 2007, pp. 47–62
- Boustan, Ra'anan S., "Violence, Scripture, and Textual Practice in Early Judaism and Christianity", in Violence, Scripture, and Textual Practice in Early Judaism and Christianity, Ra'anan S. Boustan, Alex P. Jassen, Calvin J. Roetzel (Eds), Brill, 2010 pp. 1–12
- Bowersock, G. W. (2013), The Throne of Adulis: Red Sea Wars of the Eve of Islam, Oxford University Press
- Chilton, Bruce, Abraham's Curse: The Roots of Violence in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Doubleday, 2009
- Chomsky, Noam, World orders, old and new, Columbia University Press, 1996
- Ehrlich, Carl. S, "Joshua, Judaism, and Genocide", in Jewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century, Judit Targarona Borrás, Ángel Sáenz-Badillos (Eds). 1999, Brill. pp. 117–124.
- Ellens, J. Harold (Ed.), The destructive power of religion: violence in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2007
- Esber, Rosemarie M., Under the Cover of War: The Zionist Expulsion of the Palestinians, Arabicus Books & Media, LLC, 2009
- Feldman, Louis H., "Remember Amalek!": vengeance, zealotry, and group destruction in the Bible according to Philo, Pseudo-Philo, and Josephus, Hebrew Union College Press, 2004
- Firestone, Reuven, "Judaism on Violence and Reconciliation: An Examination of Key Sources", in Beyond violence: religious sources of social transformation in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, James Heft (Ed.), Fordham Univ Press, 2004, pp. 74–87
- Glick, Leonard B., "Religion and Genocide", in The Widening circle of genocide, Alan L. Berger (Ed). Transaction Publishers, 1994, pp. 43–74
- Gopin, Marc, Between Eden and Armageddon: the future of world religions, violence, and peacemaking, Oxford University Press US, 2000.
- Harkabi, Yehoshafat, Arab attitudes to Israel, John Wiley and Sons, 1974
- Heft, James (Ed.), Beyond violence: religious sources of social transformation in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Fordham Univ Press, 2004
- Hirst, David, The gun and the olive branch: the roots of violence in the Middle East, Nation Books, 2003
- Hoffman, R. Joseph, The just war and jihad: violence in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Prometheus Books, 2006
- Horowitz, Elliott S., Reckless rites: Purim and the legacy of Jewish violence, Princeton University Press, 2006
- Jacobs, Steven Leonard, "The Last Uncomfortable Religious Question? Monotheistic Exclusivism and Textual Superiority in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as Sources of Hate and Genocide", in Confronting genocide: Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Steven L. Jacobs (Ed.), Lexington Books, 2009, pp. 35–46
- Johnson, Paul, A History of the Jews, Harper Perennial, 1987
- Juergensmeyer, Mark, Terror in the mind of God: the global rise of religious violence, University of California Press, 2003
- Kuper, Leo, "Theological Warrants for Genocide: Judaism, Islam, and Christianity", in Confronting genocide: Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Steven L. Jacobs (Ed.), Lexington Books, 2009, pp. 3–34
- Lustick, Ian, For the land and the Lord: Jewish fundamentalism in Israel, Council on Foreign Relations, 1988
- Masalha, Nur, The Bible and Zionism: Invented Traditions, Archaeology and Post-colonialism in Palestine-Israel, Zed Books, 2007
- Morris, Benny, The birth of the Palestinian refugee problem revisited, Cambridge University Press, 2004
- Niditch, Susan, War in the Hebrew Bible: a study in the ethics of violence, Oxford University Press US, 1995
- Pappe, Ilan, The ethnic cleansing of Palestine, Oneworld, 2007
- Pedahzur, Ami, Jewish terrorism in Israel, Columbia University Press, Columbia University Press, 2009
- Perliger, Arie and Weinberg, Leonard, "Jewish Self-Defence and Terrorist Groups Prior to the Establishment of the State of Israel: Roots and Traditions", in Religious fundamentalism and political extremism, Perliger, Arie (Ed.), Taylor & Francis, 2004, pp. 91–118
- Phillips, Gary A., "More Than the Jews … His Blood Be Upon All the Children: Biblical Violence, Genocide and Responsible Reading", in Confronting genocide: Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Steven L. Jacobs (Ed.), Lexington Books, 2009, pp. 77–87
- Pitkanen, Pekka, "Memory, Witnesses, and Genocide in the Book of Joshua", in Reading the law: studies in honour of Gordon J. Wenham, J. Gordon McConville, Karl Möller (Eds), Continuum International Publishing Group, 2007, pp. 267–282
- Prior, Michael P., The Bible and colonialism: a moral critique, Sheffield Academic Press, 1997.
- Quigley, John B., Palestine and Israel: a challenge to justice, Duke University Press, 1990
- Saleh Abd al-Jawad (2007) "Zionist Massacres: the Creation of the Palestinian Refugee Problem in the 1948 War" in Israel and the Palestinian refugees, Eyal Benvenistî, Chaim Gans, Sari Hanafi (Eds.), Springer, 2007
- Schwab, Gerald, The Day the Holocaust Began, Praeger, New York, 1990 ISBN 9780275935764
- Selengut, Charles, Sacred fury: understanding religious violence, Rowman & Littlefield, 2008
- Shahak, Israel, Jewish fundamentalism in Israel, Pluto Press, 1999
- Sprinzak, Ehud, Brother against brother: violence and extremism in Israeli politics from Altalena to the Rabin assassination, Simon and Schuster, 1999
- Van Wees, Hans, "Genocide in the Ancient World", in The Oxford Handbook of Genocide Studies, Donald Bloxham, A. Dirk Moses (Eds), Oxford University Press US, 2010, pp. 239–258.
- Weisburd, David, Jewish Settler Violence, Penn State Press, 1985
- Whitelam, Keith W., The invention of ancient Israel: the silencing of Palestinian history, Routledge, 1996