Revision as of 15:49, 11 November 2013 view sourceKylo Ren (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,335 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:13, 22 January 2025 view source SilverLocust (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators25,279 edits →User:Cmrc23: extendedTag: Reply | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Short description|Place to request rollback rights}} | |||
<noinclude>{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}{{Requests for permissions|state=uncollapsed}}{{adminbacklog}}<!--If the backlog is cleared, than change this to {{noadminbacklog}} and vice-versa.--></noinclude> | |||
{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}{{WP:PERM/Nav}}{{WP:PERM/Backlog|none}}<!-- do not remove, managed by bot --></noinclude> | |||
{{Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback}} | |||
=== |
===<span id="rperm-rollback"></span>Rollback=== | ||
{{WP:PERM/Subpage|shortcut=R|subpage=Rollback|notice=<noinclude> | |||
:;(<span class="plainlinks"> • ]</span>) | |||
Please review ''']''' before making a request. Successful applicants will usually have: | |||
<noinclude>{{TOCright}}{{Shortcuts|WP:PERM/R|WP:RFP/R|WP:PERMS/R}} | |||
# At least {{Misplaced Pages:Rollback/Mainspace count}} ] edits. | |||
] | |||
# At least a month of experience patrolling ]. | |||
⚫ | </noinclude> | ||
# No recent history of ]. | |||
⚫ | <!-- |
||
# A track record of consistently ] editors when reverting their edits. | |||
The ] is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism. | |||
⚫ | </noinclude>}} | ||
⚫ | <!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks.--> | ||
====]==== | ====]==== | ||
* |
*{{rfplinks|1=Cmrc23}} | ||
Hello, I was temporarily granted rollback permissions to see how I do, and they are due to expire on the 27th. I believe I have been diligent and careful with this permission, and I only use it when necessary. I always warn users and I create discussions on article talk pages where necessary. ] 14:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:I withdraw my request for Rollbacker rights. The Reviewer rights recently granted to me appear to have solved the problem I was having with Real Time Changes. I may request Rollbacker rights in the future if I believe it would help my work to be able to add Huggle. Right now, I can get along without it. I also note that sometimes Rollbacker rights are withheld for at least a short period of time after Reviewer rights are granted so this would fall in line with that practice. ] (]) 05:25, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:{{comment|Automated comment}} This user was temporary rollback rights by {{no ping|Pppery}} (expires 18:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC))<!-- mb-temp-perm -->. <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <b>] <sup>]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 14:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::{{not done}} (for the bot) ] (]) 13:38, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::{{Reply|Cmrc23}} It looks like you're using generic rollback even on edits that aren't ''obvious'' ] (where vandalism is defined as being "deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a 💕") or other ]. For example, while ] might be vandalism, it could also be based on good-faith belief that the source is unreliable. Similarly, ] doesn't seem to be of obvious vandalism. Going forward, would you include the reason in the edit summary when reverting any edits that don't fall into one of criteria 1–5 at ]? ] ] 18:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::I was a little hasty with those two in particular, but I will make sure. I presumed my warning on their talk page was enough, but I try to not use it when it's not necessary (again, was hasty there, apologise) ] 19:55, 21 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::::{{done}}. Extended by 1 month. ] ] 04:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
====]==== | ====]==== | ||
* |
*{{rfplinks|1=Footballnerd2007}} | ||
I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like ] and ]. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements. | |||
:I'm a long term editor in good standing (no blocks, no DR losses), with over 15,000 edits. I usually use "undo", have occasionally used the Twinkle "" link, and I always leave meaningful edit summaries for reverts. I think my usage has always been in good faith, so I'd like rollbacker permission so I don't get dinged for using it without permission, to be honest. ] (]) 06:15, 3 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::{{done}}. ] (]) 20:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting. | |||
====]==== | |||
* {{rfplinks|1=Vantine84}} | |||
:I've been around nearly 5 years now, with a few thousand edits, all made in good faith. I have reviewer rights and would also like rollback to better assist with vandalism patrol. — <small><b><span style="border:1px solid#000000;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Chicago,sans-serif;">] (] – ])</font></span></b></small> 07:11, 4 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::{{done}}. ] (]) 21:03, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
Thank you for considering my request. ] • ] ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
====]==== | |||
* {{rfplinks|1=Irockz}} | |||
:I've been around on Misplaced Pages for roughly two years now and I commonly revert edits using the undo feature. I feel I would be trustworthy enough to be granted this power, as it would help me prevent vandalism and make it more convenient for me. ] (]) 18:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::{{nd}}. Although you have been here a while you have only about 150 edits to articles and do not appear to have ever reported a vandal at ]. ] (]) 21:08, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
====]==== | |||
* {{rfplinks|1=Joz3d}} | |||
:Well, another year and it'll have been almost a decade on Misplaced Pages for me :D I'm mostly a WikiGnome, so rollback would be helpful for me, as I've reverted many mistakes and some vandalized pages. I wasn't aware until today that there was a way to do it so much easier! I'd appreciate it. ] (]) 20:58, 4 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::{{notdone}}. With only 202 edits to articles in 'almost a decade' you don't exactly appear to have a need for this tool. With your 200 edits however, you do now qualify for enrollment at the ] where you can learn all about anti vandalism. ] (]) 11:07, 8 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
====]==== | |||
* {{rfplinks|1=The Triple M}} | |||
:I have been on Misplaced Pages for a year and a half now, with 201 edits (due to an unplanned ] that spanned over six months). I have proven to be very efficient at removing vandalism, and I am hoping that obtaining rollback rights will make it much easier. Thank you. ]] 22:05, 4 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::{{nd}}. Only 55 article edits, currently blocked for socking. ] (]) 20:42, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
====]==== | |||
* {{rfplinks|1=Chirags}} | |||
:To stop vandalism on OfficeDepot and various pages ] (]) 03:44, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
====]==== | |||
* {{rfplinks|1=Hooooooof}} | |||
:I'm ''relatively'' new and have not done much past 200 but I would like to have this feature. So far I have avoided conflict and I realise that the feature is not designed for plain reverting, not even if the editor one suspects to have made errors has made 10 edits on the bounce all of which need reverting. It would be for blatant vandalism only. BTW in the few months I have been here, yes I could have made far more contributions but sadly I don't get the time to be online every day and I only have my computer (no mobile phone which allows full WP editing/digital device which can be carried). Thanks in advance. ] (]) 12:10, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
====]==== | |||
* {{rfplinks|1=Jgera5}} | |||
:I have made many contributions to Misplaced Pages over the years and have tried to make the right decisions for the community. I feel that with the rollback feature I can help improve Misplaced Pages even more. ] (]) 07:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::{{done}}--v/r - ]] 23:45, 10 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
====]==== | |||
* {{rfplinks|1=Sam Sailor}} | |||
:Having used STiki and Twinkle regularly I wish to give Huggle a go, to which end Rollback is required. While I shall not judge myself and my mediocre accomplishments in the community, I hope my track record to some extend reflects a user with a decent grasp on basic editing policies and good faith when communicating with his fellow editors. <font face="Eras Bold ITC">] '']''</font> 21:12, 9 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::{{done}}--v/r - ]] 23:45, 10 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
====]==== | |||
* {{rfplinks|1=Epicfailure 2}} | |||
:This being an alternative account of rollbacker {{u|Epicgenius}}, could you please give this account the right for rollback? Thanks! ] (]) 15:49, 11 November 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 04:13, 22 January 2025
Place to request rollback rightsRequests for permissions | |
---|---|
Common | |
Uncommon | |
Logs | |
Special |
Rollback
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions. (add request · view requests) Shortcuts Please review Misplaced Pages:Rollback before making a request. Successful applicants will usually have:- At least 200 mainspace edits.
- At least a month of experience patrolling Special:RecentChanges.
- No recent history of edit warring.
- A track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits.
User:Cmrc23
- Cmrc23 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
Hello, I was temporarily granted rollback permissions to see how I do, and they are due to expire on the 27th. I believe I have been diligent and careful with this permission, and I only use it when necessary. I always warn users and I create discussions on article talk pages where necessary. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 14:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by Pppery (expires 18:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot 14:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Cmrc23: It looks like you're using generic rollback even on edits that aren't obvious vandalism (where vandalism is defined as being "deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a 💕") or other categories of rollback that don't need an explanatory edit summary. For example, while removing a reference might be vandalism, it could also be based on good-faith belief that the source is unreliable. Similarly, this rollback doesn't seem to be of obvious vandalism. Going forward, would you include the reason in the edit summary when reverting any edits that don't fall into one of criteria 1–5 at WP:ROLLBACKUSE? SilverLocust 💬 18:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- I was a little hasty with those two in particular, but I will make sure. I presumed my warning on their talk page was enough, but I try to not use it when it's not necessary (again, was hasty there, apologise) Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 19:55, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done. Extended by 1 month. SilverLocust 💬 04:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- I was a little hasty with those two in particular, but I will make sure. I presumed my warning on their talk page was enough, but I try to not use it when it's not necessary (again, was hasty there, apologise) Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 19:55, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Cmrc23: It looks like you're using generic rollback even on edits that aren't obvious vandalism (where vandalism is defined as being "deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a 💕") or other categories of rollback that don't need an explanatory edit summary. For example, while removing a reference might be vandalism, it could also be based on good-faith belief that the source is unreliable. Similarly, this rollback doesn't seem to be of obvious vandalism. Going forward, would you include the reason in the edit summary when reverting any edits that don't fall into one of criteria 1–5 at WP:ROLLBACKUSE? SilverLocust 💬 18:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
User:Footballnerd2007
- Footballnerd2007 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like WP:VAND and WP:AGF. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements.
Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting.
Thank you for considering my request. Footballnerd2007 • talk ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)