Revision as of 05:12, 17 June 2006 editAlienus (talk | contribs)7,662 edits It's all in the history, so you can't hide it.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:26, 17 May 2024 edit undoIntrisit (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,783 edits Added "Not around" template per a glance at the user's contributions page. | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Not around|date=14 January 2022}} | |||
Archives: ] ] ] | |||
Archives: ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] | |||
== Please create sections below == | |||
==Welcome== | |||
Thanks. | |||
Please leave me a message below, if you're so inclined. ] 20:23, 19 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
== Request for comment == | |||
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by {{noping|Anna Frodesiak}}. Your comments ] is very much appreciated. Many thanks. ] through ] (]) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
The soapbox comment was unnecessary. (re: Vulva discussion) ] 04:30, 15 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Jim Cartar@enwiki using the list at //en.wikipedia.org/Category:Wikipedia_administrators --> | |||
== ] == | |||
I hope you're not upset about my edit on your User page. It was a tongue-in-cheek response to your note on Vandalism. I only noticed you because you edited my user page to fix the User box. Have a great day! ] 17:48, 16 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Please reduce the protection on this article back down to semi-protected status. Misplaced Pages users should not capitulate to the single purpose accounts and POV pushers trying to say "it's biased it's biased" when it reflects the current weight of the subject across all reliable sources. It also only recently was unprotected and this just puts it into the same stagnation it was before. There was no call for full protection this time and one extremely obvious SPA's actions should not lock everything down, again.—] (]) 02:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
==Mutilation and so on== | |||
== ] == | |||
As it seems the concerned edtiors of the various articles ] and ] are unable to come to a consensus perhaps a request for comment or moderation is appropriate? ] 11:13, 11 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
For blocks placed through general sanctions, you should use ] in future. ] — ] 03:19, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
: Sure. Either or both is fine with me. ] 11:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
* Thanks for the pointer. ] (]) 03:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Don't feel like making a new thread. How does ]?—] (]) 04:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Please see my comments on this re ], and reconsider if you think a DRV is needed for it. — ] <sup>]</sup> 12:18, 11 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
:I suppose my "reason for the undelete" was that I disagree that this falls under T1, not just that a prior deletion turned in a '''keep''' result. Had you not already listed it on DRV, I would have suggested bringing it back to tfd. In any case the drv may result in a consensus to delete, and following consensus is the only way to keep this project in one piece. Thanks, — ] <sup>]</sup> 15:44, 11 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Looks like mostly reasonable editing to me. Is there a specific series of edits you want to point out?? ] (]) 12:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
== DU == | |||
== ] == | |||
The chemistry of normal natural uranium is the same as both enriched uranium and DU. The isotopic nature of the uranium has next to no effect on the chemistry. So why if the paper was about normal U is it not OK to use it in a DU page ?] 20:37, 13 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Also, the price quoted in the ORNL paper doesn't strike one as outrageously expensive. DU sells at USD 20/kg, to put it into perspective, copper sells at about half that. ] 21:26, 13 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691991546 --> | |||
==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
== Adminship renewal discussion == | |||
] | |||
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 00:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
==Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
Is now at ], due to typo on my part. My apologies if it confused you. - ] 13:41, 14 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 00:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
== What happened to the 2005 2006 USA Israel threats to Iran article == | |||
] | |||
I think that's what it was called. I understand you deleted it. Was this as a result of the Articles for Deletion? If so, would you kindly tell where the arhived article and the results of the poll are stored. Thank you very much. ] 14:03, 14 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">] ]</strong> 13:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
: The debate is ]. Kind regards, ] 14:08, 14 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you so very much for your prompt reply. ] 14:22, 14 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Another question (sorry). Are we allowed to start up another (new) article on the same topic, with some of the details from the old article. The reason is that some of the issues in the topic are important, both from a current and historical perspective. Note that the new article would try to be NPOV, ie, a general converage of the situation, not targeting specific countries, and giving all sides of the story. Thank you again. ] 14:35, 14 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::OK. I will have a look a the debate again. Thank you very much for your advice. ] 15:14, 14 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
I didn't have chance to read that deleted article. I looked at the vote for deletion . Among 49, only 26 users have voted to delete it (a very slim majority). The voting has ended today (May 14). If you count votes until May 13, the votes for deletion are 16 (out of 38 votes) which is not a majority. For this kind of controversial topics (when there is no clear consensus), shouldn't you extend the voting time? ] 23:58, 14 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
::::What are the criteria for deciding to delete an article. It is a straight majority after a certain time? Does Strong Keep get move votes than Keep. Are the arguments taken into consderation? Is it an automatic process, or does an admin think "hmmm, looks close, I'll toss a coin?". Thanks. ] 21:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
==Zephram Stark== | |||
As a recently ] sysop <small>(''per ] at ]</small>''), welcome back to the admin corps. We always need help at ] if there are any areas you can help with that would be most welcomed. Happy mopping! — ] <sup>]</sup> 01:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
I only changed it back because the ban timer was set at 6 months. Sorry. --] | ] 15:48, 14 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Extended confirmed protection == | |||
:It was when I looked in the block log. --] | ] 15:51, 14 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Heya -- what happened here was that ] intended to reset the de jure 6 month ban, did not notice that a de facto indefinite ban had been imposed. So the edit was, technically, correct. I'm curious how Sunfazer noticed the block change. --]] 16:32, 14 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
{{ivmbox|1=Hello, Nandesuka. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy. | |||
== Misanthropist == | |||
] (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned ] was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following ] with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas. | |||
why did you delete the Misanthropist User Template ? ]] 11:14, 15 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
In July and August 2016, ] established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions: | |||
: See ]. ] 12:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
* '''Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective'''. It should not be used as a first resort. | |||
* '''A bot will post a notification at ] of each use'''. MusikBot currently does this by updating ], which is transcluded onto the noticeboard. | |||
Please review ] carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you. <br><small>This message was sent to the administrators' ]. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)</small> |2=Padlock-blue.svg}} | |||
<!--Message sent following discussion at WT:PP--> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=737471142 --> | |||
== Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins == | |||
Hello, | |||
==66.25.132.168== | |||
Please note that ] based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your ] in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the ] for additional information. '''Important''': Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the ]. ] (]) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
I am not a sock puppet to WoW so please unblock me.. May you please unblock me.. I am not a sock puppet to WoW. I don't even know what that is! 66.25.132.168 is a school IP! There are many students that use this site. And if the IP is blocked indefently, That means no one can contribute to Misplaced Pages! Please unblock me. | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mike V@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mike_V/All_admins&oldid=749162175 --> | |||
== A new user right for New Page Patrollers == | |||
== nathan's talk == | |||
Hi {{BASEPAGENAME}}. | |||
when did he give you permission to do this ? I know him and I am almost 100% sure he would not have given you permission to do so. <font color="red">]</font><font color="orange">]</font><font color="limegreen">]</font>] <sup>(</sup>]<sup>—</sup>]<sup>—</sup>]<sup>—</sup>]<sup>)</sup> 14:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
A new user group, ], has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at ]. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right. | |||
: "I'm on Wikibreak so I don't care what you do to this page." ] 18:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available ] but very often a friendly custom message works best. | |||
::That is more of a "I don't give a fuck anymore" message than a "You can change this if you want to". <font color="red">]</font><font color="orange">]</font><font color="limegreen">]</font>] <sup>(</sup>]<sup>—</sup>]<sup>—</sup>]<sup>—</sup>]<sup>)</sup> 18:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at ]. <small>''(Sent to all admins)''</small>.] (]) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
::: Ah, OK. Thank you for clarifying. ] 19:25, 15 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=748418714 --> | |||
== ]: Voting now open! == | |||
==Inches or Centimeters== | |||
] | |||
((1) you're wrong, (2) there are already enough images.) | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Nandesuka. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
1. I am including an image of the actual scale used in the photo. You can see it next to the reverse side showing the cm scale (1 inch=2.54cm=25.4mm). Hopefully this satisfies you that the scale is in inches as the caption says. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/7&oldid=750547185 --> | |||
== Proposed deletion of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
2. I added the image as I thought it was educational. There are two images on the page which seems odd given there is such diversity in erections. I thought having an image of one with a greater angle and some curvature would be informative to readers. | |||
:'''Not the subject of ] from ], ]. <small>(])</small> No in-depth hits in a ] and no suitable redirect targets (isn't known as an employee or designer of a single company/game).''' | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
] 08:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
== Trimming needed == | |||
Have you ever looked at the ] article? It begins with ''"It is nearly impossible to accurately measure the depth of a phenomenon's popularity..."'' - ]<span class="plainlinks"></span> 11:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="background:#F0F0FF; padding:3px 9px 4px">]</span> 08:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
==Hell== | |||
It's not a personal attack, just an observation. I said "might" instead of "should." Fear of hell depends on your religious beliefs and your (you too) own inner sense of right and wrong. Regardless, we are all responsible (liable) for the consiquences of our actions.] 14:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Administrators' newsletter - February 2017 == | |||
== Circumcision comments == | |||
] from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please ]. Your ] is welcomed. | |||
It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. ] and ] only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain ] with your comments. Thanks! <!-- from Template:Civil1 --> ] 04:29, 19 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
] '''Administrator changes''' | |||
: Thanks for your comments! I disagree with your belief that I was incivil, but I will certainly take your words under advisement. ] 11:07, 19 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
:] ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] | |||
:] ] • ] • ] | |||
] '''Guideline and policy news''' | |||
==Mediation== | |||
:*A ] to workshop proposals to amend the ] at ] has been in process since late December 2016. | |||
:*] closed with no consensus for implementing ] with new criteria for use. | |||
:*Following ], an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators. | |||
] '''Technical news''' | |||
Hi, I'm going to be mediating your case, regarding the Medical analysis of circumcision. | |||
:*When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (]) | |||
:*Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Misplaced Pages, an ] closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (]) | |||
:* The Foundation has ] a new ] to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017. | |||
] '''Arbitration''' | |||
The mediation will take place ]. If you are planning to take a wiki-break in the near-future or will be unable to partcipate in the mediation could you please let me know. --]]] 19:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
:*The Arbitration Committee released ] to the Wikimedia Foundation's ]. | |||
] '''Obituaries''' | |||
== Copyvios == | |||
:* ] (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Misplaced Pages seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009. | |||
---- | |||
PLEASE be more careful when looking for copyvios. Other sites copy us too. See ]. --] 14:44, 21 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
{{center|] • ] • ]}} | |||
13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
==Mediation News== | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Samwalton9@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/First_issue&oldid=763126991 --> | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
I've now added my initial questions and comments on ]. I would ask that you add this page to your watchlist, as this will be where the mediation will take place. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> <span style="background:#F0F0FF; padding:3px 9px 4px">]</span> 07:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
As I've said on the page, we must keep all debate Civil, and I will not tolerate any personal attacks. In order to resolve the issue all of you must be willing to listen to each other's view. It does appear that you have debated this issue qutie extensively already, and so if we are to achieve anything we must not keep repeating what has already been said, although reference may well be needed back to previous comments you have made. | |||
== Invitation to Admin confidence survey == | |||
If you have any questions or comments then please either e-mail me or leave a message on my talk page. Again if you are planning to take a Wikibreak, or know you will be unable to access Misplaced Pages for any length of time then please do infrom me. | |||
Hello, | |||
I look forward to working with you. --]]] 20:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Misplaced Pages administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment. | |||
== ] == | |||
The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators. | |||
SPAM WARNING - quasi form letter follows! (#4)<br/> | |||
I'm attempting to open the biggest can of worms ever. You're a nice balance between "hard arse" and "man of the people." So I'd like to hear your thoughts on the category I've just created. <br/>]<span class="plainlinks"> </span> 07:43, 24 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
<big>To take the survey sign up ''']''' and we will send you a link to the form.</big> | |||
== F1 portal featured article == | |||
We really appreciate your input! | |||
The F1 portal (in which I assume you have some degree of interest, as your name is listed on ]) is intended to have a regular rotation of a 'featured article'. I've swapped a few in and out over the last couple of months, but I think it would be better if there were more of a community attempt at deciding this, proposals, votes, that kind of thing. So - why not pop over to ] and make a suggestion. Ta. ] 00:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
<small>Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all ] from the Anti-harassment tools team. </small> | |||
== Signature == | |||
For the Anti-harassment tools team, ] (]) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:SPoore (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:SPoore_(WMF)/Admin_confidence_survey_massmessage_list_1&oldid=17221089 --> | |||
== List of pregnancy-related topics listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''List of pregnancy-related topics'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] ] ] 23:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
Any better? --]] <sup>] ]</sup> 17:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Nandesuka. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
== Thank you for your comments in ] ]! == | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
{|cellspacing=7px style="background-color:Yellow; padding: 0px; border: 1px solid #888; halign:center;valign:center;" | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=2 style="background-color:white; padding: 10px 0px 0px 0px; border: 1px solid #888;"|<center>]<small> | |||
''We are here to build an ]!''</small></center> | |||
|style="background-color: lightyellow; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #888;"| | |||
Hi Nandesuka, and thank you for your positive comments in my ]! (I got the buttons!!) With a final tally of '''(109/5/1)''', I have been entrusted with ]. It's been several weeks since the conclusion of the process, so hopefully you've had a ] . Please ] what you think! Thanks again and I hope to live up to the trust you've placed in me! '''<font color="green">]</font><font color="blue">]</font>''']: ]/] 03:25, 28 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
|- | |||
|style="background-color: lightyellow; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #888;"|<small>'''Adverts:''' Like ]?... Like ]?... In a WikiProject that ]?... Are ] an ] admin?... Got ]?...</small> | |||
|} | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
==RE: "wanking," etc.== | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
Hi. Please ensure that personal attacks directed against me are limited to IRC or anywhere else outside the wiki. Thank you in advance. ] 02:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=813406947 --> | |||
:I interpreted that comment as a description of #wikipedia in general rather than of you or any other individual. -]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 02:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
::Yeah, I just said pretty much the same thing on El C's talk page. --]] 02:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
:::If that was the case, I misread that and I offer my sincere apologies. ] 02:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::: I wasn't even speaking of #wikipedia. That's pretty much my impression of IRC as a whole. It wasn't intended as a direct personal attack on any one person, but as a general critique (or, if you will, insult) of the medium. ] 03:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::::Sorry, I'm a bit on edge. Thanks for understanding. Regards, ] 03:22, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
== Your remarks on my talk page. == | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] <sup>]</sup> 19:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. ] and ] only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain ] with your comments. Thanks! <!-- from Template:Civil1 --> ] 16:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
:Thanks, Al. As always, I believe I've been perfectly civil. But I do so treasure your friendly reminders. ] 17:06, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Nandesuka. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
I apologize for not being sufficiently clear. The uncivil remark in question was: | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
:::: It's been my experience that once Alienus decides that someone is part of "the cabal," he doesn't let inconvenient facts get in the way of his dogma. ] 15:06, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
I'm sure you can see how a reasonable person might consider this uncivil. Thank you for understanding. ] 17:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=866998273 --> | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Mister Rogers' Neighborhood.jpg== | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:46, 5 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
: I don't view that as uncivil. Simply descriptive. Kind regards, ] 17:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2019 special circular == | |||
How you view it isn't particularly important. What matters is whether a reasonable person could anticipate that the recipient might view it as uncivil. Consider the case of my humorous comment to Jakew, which he took offense to. Oh, wait, that case isn't parallel at all, because you never apologized and you're not getting blocked for a week. Never mind, I'll have to find a better example. ] 17:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;"> | |||
: ] is not a suicide pact. I don't try to anticipate your reactions as a reasonable person because, very often, you don't act like one. Just to pick one obvious example, reasonable people don't publish an "enemies list" on the top of their talk page, and revert even innocuous or polite comments as vandalism. Your behavior in recent weeks has, in fact, been much improved, which demonstrates that your extended blocks were, at least from a purely didactic perspective, quite effective. I sincerely hope that you can continue to grow and mature in the way you deal with editors with whom you disagree. Kind regards, ] 17:45, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
{| | |||
|valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em 1em 0 0.25em;"| ] | |||
|<span style="font-size: 125%;">'''Administrators ] secure their accounts'''</span> | |||
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. | |||
* Use strong, unique passwords for your Misplaced Pages account and associated email | |||
* ] if your Misplaced Pages account password or email password is reused on another website, , or weak | |||
* ] for improved security | |||
|} | |||
<span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular">{{clickable button 2|1=View additional information|link=no}}</span> | |||
</div><div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none"> | |||
<div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;"> | |||
{| style="border-left: 3px solid black; padding-left: 1em;" | |||
At this point, you are pouring incivility on top of incivility. Rather than further engage you, I will show maturity by walking away. ] 17:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
|{{null}} | |||
; Why have I received this message? | |||
: All administrators are receiving it. | |||
; What prompted you to send this message? | |||
== Concerned over your censoring Cuzandor's remarks == | |||
: Recently, several Misplaced Pages admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were ]. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh ] after losing control of their account. | |||
; What do I need to do? | |||
I'm not defending him, he was way out of line. But if you completely remove any sign that he made the remarks, people might not realize what sort of person they are dealing with when they talk to him. (Of course, the edit history is still there, but it's not as immediately obvious.) I've always felt that it's best to let a fool dig his own grave with his mouth. By cleaning up after Cuzandor, you're just making it easier for him to avoid the consequences of his actions. Cheers, ] 02:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Only to follow the instructions in this message. | |||
:# Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). | |||
:# Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). | |||
:# Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. | |||
; How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? | |||
:In addition, he replaced Cuz's unthinking insensitivity with an allegation of bigotry. This is not an improvement. It's hardly even civil. ] 03:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
: You can find out more about 2FA at ]. | |||
|}</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<small>This message was sent to all administrators following a ]. Thank you for your attention. For the ], ] 02:30, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> | |||
:: I am perfectly comfortable describing someone who talks about "African savages" as a bigot. If you're not, then that's your problem. ] 03:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> | |||
== Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular) == | |||
:As I saw it, he was describing circumcision as savagery. Now, I wouldn't go that far, but I would also ], unlike you. ] 03:10, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community. | |||
:: I think the phrase "And how the savages in africa or australia or whatever do it too" is perfectly clear in its intent, and that you wish to make excuses for such bigotry is shameful. ] 03:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Like I said, I assume good faith, which is what makes me such a good person. When given a chance, Cuz changed "savages" to "circumcisers", just as I expected. Speaking of expectations, your claims about my support for bigotry are as false as they are uncivil. But, of course, I don't expect you to admit this, much less apologize. Fortunately, I'm a good person, so I'll forgive you in advance. ] 03:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
:: You are welcome to protest that supporting (and re-adding) the phrase "how the savages in africa or australia or whatever" doesn't constitute support for bigotry as much as you like. I'm confident that all will see that you protest too much. ] 04:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::Are you replying to Alienus or to me? The lack of nesting to these remarks makes them a little hard to follow. ] 04:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC): | |||
:::: Nesting fixed. Thanks. :-) ] 11:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Sorry I didn't know savage was an offensive word ] 01:37, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Connotations often don't translate well. This is why we assume good faith. ] 03:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Episiotomy == | |||
Better sources? At least here in Brazil they do episidotomies just like they do circumcisions in USA Check this: | |||
http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7343/945 | |||
and this: | |||
http://www.gentlebirth.org/nwnm.org/Tragedy_Routine_Episiotomy.htm | |||
] 01:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
== re: ] == | |||
Sir? I confess that I'm confused... did I do something which you think is wrong? Can I help rectify it? ] ] 17:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Heh... no worries. Yeah, I don't really get where he's coming from, myself. Or Alienus. I'd like to try and explain myself to help them out, but I don't understand them so I'm having some trouble. I'll think of something, though... or at least I'll try. :) ] ] 18:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Just saw your comments over there. Never mind, I don't think there's much I can do, unfortunately. *sigh* ] ] 18:09, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Acuccowhatever == | |||
You are wrong. A Google search indicates the word is in very much and in fact widely used, and in the proper manner (as a synonym for the state of circumcision, although there is the odd -philia confusion). So ''ridiculous made-up word that nobody actually uses.'' is provably and verifiably false. Matter of fact is that for some reason that I do not really understand you do object to the addition of this word. Since you have repeatedly shown that you do not act in good faith, but conciously try to provoke people into breaking WP:CIV and WP:3RR as well as other rules, I must assume you, Nandesuka do this purely to annoy me and Alienus (who you, I believe, percieve as POV-Enemies?). This would constitute ] (As in: "Any change in a deliberate attempt to reduce the quality of the Encyclopedia") and ]. So I must ask you to please cease your vandalism / stalking, Nandesuka. It may get you banned if you continue. ] 14:19, 9 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
: I disagree with your assessment. I think the google search is pretty good evidence that no one actually uses the word. ] 15:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
You have now I must again request that you cease your abuse, and be more careful. If you continue your behaviour, you will be blocked from editing on Misplaced Pages. ] 16:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Generally speaking, removing personal attacks -- such as the one you were recently blocked for, which you reference above -- is not considered vandalism. Hope that helps. Have a nice day. ] 18:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
I think that there should have been a block for that attack (indeed, that was my first instinct), but seeing as I missed it by a day I'm not going to do anything about it apart from bringing it up on his talk page, as the situation does not seem to have continued. Let me know if it picks up again in the future and I will happily look into the situation. | |||
As an aside, I disagree with your removing that edit from the Circumcision talk page and from Dabljuh's user page, not because it's an attack, but because it's an attack against you. In the future, I'd recommend bringing the situation to WP:AN or the attention of another administrator such as myself, as I believe it's a bad idea to remove those sorts of things yourself. I don't necessarily disagree with your actions, but I think you'd be better off having a second party taking care of the situation rather than doing it yourself. Best, ] ] 02:05, 10 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are ] to "have strong passwords and ]." We have ] our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, ] remains an ''optional'' means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised. | |||
I saw that you violated 3RR. I wouldn't have reported you without giving you a chance to revert, anyhow, but we're still left with the question of why you're edit-warring to remove what is, at worst, an innocuous entry. What's so horrible about a neutral, boring synonym that makes it worth fighting over? ] 02:09, 10 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
: I have this thing against nonexistent words. What's your excuse? | |||
: Incidentally, I don't think I actually violated 3RR -- one of the edits I was counting was moving your addition of "male genital mutilation" to another place in the introduction that made more sense. But, hey, better safe than sorry. Edit warring is always a bad thing, but it takes two to tango. So, seriously: why are you adding a word that is not used in conversation, is not used in any scientific literature, is not used in any ''non-scientific'' literature, and as near as anyone can tell has an existence entirely within the rarified air of "internet dictionaries of user-contributed sex terms?" ] 03:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered. | |||
==]== | |||
Please see my comments ]. Please know that both he and I agree that the tag is needed. ] 13:20, 13 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Might I enquire as to whether or not you have '''fully''' apprised yourself of the actual history of that article's archived talk pages? ] and his associated sockpuppets and anon-IPs have gone to long lengths over long periods of time to "own" that article. While I understand your concerns unfortunately I fear that you are editing from a less than fully informed position relative to the article being tagged or not. ] 13:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
For the Arbitration Committee, -] 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small> | |||
Nandesuka! Don't remove the POV tag against my very detailled objections. I'm not an electronic library working 24 hours a day on WP. I'd have to do some work on this, re-reading books and articles and identifying good English language sources. 30 seconds is not quite enough for me for me to improve the article. All I'm willing and able to do at the moment is point out why the article seriously needs a POV tag. I did so in considerable detail. Don't expect me to come up overnight with everything that the article needs. ] 14:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular correction --> | |||
: What I expect is for you to not tendentiously edit war over the POV tag. ] 14:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 --> | |||
:: Well, I don't. I follow proper procedure (From ]): "Guidelines for cleanup - 1. If the discussion presents major issues that have not been fixed in the current article version, even if the discussion is old, leave the NPOV tag on so it can be cleaned up in the future. 2. If the issues are minor and there is no recent discussion, remove the tag. (If someone disagrees they can just put it back!)". This tells me two things: 1. You shouldn't remove the NPOV tag. 2. I "can just put it back". No edit war here. ] 23:12, 13 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
==Conservative notice board== | |||
Curious, why did you delete it? ] 01:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
: The page's history and content both demonstrated that it was organized explicitly to push specific political positions, contravening WP:NPOV, which is a core policy here. ] 19:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
== You know better. == | |||
Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. | |||
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
Please see Misplaced Pages's ] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to ] for disruption. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. <!-- Template:No personal attacks --> | |||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
I noticed the following ] edit comment by you: | |||
2006-06-15 19:17:48 (hist) (diff) Circumcision (Rv. nonsensical and barely English.) | |||
== Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
Come on, you ought to know better than to do this. As an admin, you're supposed to enforce these rules, not break them. ] 14:45, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Stop acting like a troll. I was being perfectly descriptive. The addition was nonsensical, and was barely English. ] 15:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Misplaced Pages has a policy against ]. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be ] from editing by admins or ] by the ]. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please ] appropriately. Thank you. <!-- Template:Attack --> | |||
Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days. | |||
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
Thank you for responding to my civility warning with further incivility, in the form of a personal attack. Rather than waste my time arguing the obvious, I will let your words speak for themselves. ] 19:06, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
: Hey, you should try doing that more often. | |||
: In any event, I'll start taking civility warnings from you seriously, as opposed to treating them like the trolling that they are, when you (a) and (b) stop doing things like referring to ArbCom proceedings as "lynchings" and referring to your fellow editors as "snippies." Until then, I treat your warnings as bad-faith accusations from a repeatedly blocked offender. It turns out that we extend less good faith to editors who, like you, . If you truly believe that I have violated Misplaced Pages policies, then I encourage you to open an RFC or RFArb against me. I am confident that any neutral parties examining our respective histories will immediately see your antics for what they are. ] 19:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
This is your '''last warning'''. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be ] for disruption.<!-- Template:Npa3 --> <!-- This noinclude may not be honored in some cases. Bug? --> | |||
== Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
Calling me a troll again is a form of personal attack. Please read the rules that you're supposed to enforce. You'll find that "he called me names first" is not a defense. Likewise, you are violating ] by claiming I intended to hide supposed crimes when I wiped my page clean in disgust. | |||
] | |||
Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed. | |||
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ]. | |||
Anyhow, this is your final warning. If you continue to personally attack me, I will take the next step. ] 00:04, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 00:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
: Whatever. Please stop trolling on my talk page. It's rude. ] 00:11, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Blastoff.png== | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
You have called me a troll yet again. This is, in and of itself, a blockable offense. Do you apologize and retract or should I file for a block now? ] 01:04, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
: I encourage you to take whatever actions that do not violate Misplaced Pages policies that will result in you stopping your endless badgering and trolling on my talk page. If you feel comfortable filing for an RFC or RFArb or requesting a block for my describing your edits as trolling as such on the ''very same day'' that you refer to Arbcom as a "lynching" and a "kangaroo court" and calling fellow editors as "snippies", presumably a reference to their genitals, then by all means go for it. ] 01:30, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
Not content with personal attacks and incivility, you are deleting valid warning tags even while this case is under review. Clearly, you do not respect the rules you are expected to enforce. Feel free to delete this, too, and even call me a troll some more. It's all in the history; you can't hide it. ] 05:12, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 21:51, 27 August 2021 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:26, 17 May 2024
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Nandesuka has not edited Misplaced Pages since 14 January 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Archives: Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10
Please create sections below
Thanks.
Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Gamergate controversy
Please reduce the protection on this article back down to semi-protected status. Misplaced Pages users should not capitulate to the single purpose accounts and POV pushers trying to say "it's biased it's biased" when it reflects the current weight of the subject across all reliable sources. It also only recently was unprotected and this just puts it into the same stagnation it was before. There was no call for full protection this time and one extremely obvious SPA's actions should not lock everything down, again.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 02:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
WP:GS/GG
For blocks placed through general sanctions, you should use this template in future. RGloucester — ☎ 03:19, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the pointer. Nandesuka (talk) 03:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Don't feel like making a new thread. How does this guy fare in these matters?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 04:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like mostly reasonable editing to me. Is there a specific series of edits you want to point out?? Nandesuka (talk) 12:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 13:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
WP:RESYSOP
As a recently returned sysop (per Special:PermaLink/733330820 at WP:BN), welcome back to the admin corps. We always need help at WP:ADMINBACKLOG if there are any areas you can help with that would be most welcomed. Happy mopping! — xaosflux 01:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
Hello, Nandesuka. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi Nandesuka.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Nandesuka. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of David Rolfe (programmer)
The article David Rolfe (programmer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not the subject of significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) No in-depth hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search and no suitable redirect targets (isn't known as an employee or designer of a single company/game).
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 08:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
- NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
- Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Misplaced Pages:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Misplaced Pages, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
- The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Misplaced Pages seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive
13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of David Rolfe (programmer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Rolfe (programmer) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/David Rolfe (programmer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 07:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Invitation to Admin confidence survey
Hello,
Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Misplaced Pages administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.
The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.
To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.
We really appreciate your input!
Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.
For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
List of pregnancy-related topics listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of pregnancy-related topics. Since you had some involvement with the List of pregnancy-related topics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 23:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Nandesuka. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of List of magicians in fantasy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of magicians in fantasy is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of magicians in fantasy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia 19:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Nandesuka. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mister Rogers' Neighborhood.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mister Rogers' Neighborhood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular
Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
View additional information
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:30, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 00:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Blastoff.png
Thanks for uploading File:Blastoff.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Susie Tallman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susie Tallman is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Susie Tallman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Edwardx (talk) 21:51, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Categories: