Revision as of 03:26, 21 October 2014 edit69.73.201.85 (talk) →James Harrison (blood donor) fact check: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:28, 28 January 2016 edit undoGiraffedata (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers98,999 editsmNo edit summary | ||
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{archives|auto=short|search=yes|title=Manual Archives}} <!-- manual archives, only needed when discussion occurs on this page --> | {{archives|auto=short|search=yes|title=Manual Archives}} <!-- manual archives, only needed when discussion occurs on this page --> | ||
This page was formerly used as a way to make it easier to open ]. It was |
This page was formerly used as a way to make it easier to open ]. It was deprecated on 1 September 2014 as a result of ]. Previous requests are documented in the archives. | ||
To make a new request, see ]. | |||
== James Harrison (blood donor) fact check == | |||
If James Harrison produced strong Anti-Rh (Anti-D) antibodies, he would genotypically be Rh (-) or D(-). RhoGAM is only given to Rh(-) mothers as prophylaxis. If mother and father are both Rh (-), it is genotypically impossible for the baby to be Rh (+), and his daughter's life would never have been "saved" by his "contributions". Unless it's not his child. |
Latest revision as of 23:28, 28 January 2016
This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
Manual Archives |
This page was formerly used as a way to make it easier to open requests for comment. It was deprecated on 1 September 2014 as a result of this discussion. Previous requests are documented in the archives.
To make a new request, see Requests for comment.
Category: