Revision as of 19:06, 14 February 2015 view sourceCourcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits →{{la|Kirby Delauter}}: not unprotected← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:25, 22 January 2025 view source Cyberbot I (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors1,723,934 edits Clerking main page and moving requests to appropriate subpages.Tag: Manual revert | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{noadminbacklog}}<!-- Do not hide or modify this, a bot named "Cyberbot I" will manage it automatically.--><noinclude><!-- Please put protection templates *inside* the noinclude, because this page is transcluded. -->{{Short description|Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages}}{{/Header}}{{Floating link|class=sysop-show|Administrator instructions|Administrator instructions}}{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}}{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed|{{pp|1=vandalism|action=edit|small=yes|expiry=}}}}<!-- Put interwikis at the Wikidata entry and categories in /Header instead of this page --> | |||
<!-- please put protection templates *inside* the noinclude, because this page is transcluded --><noinclude> | |||
⚫ | __FORCETOC__</noinclude><!-- Do not hide or modify this, a bot named "Cyberbot I" will manage it automatically--> | ||
{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}}{{/Header}}{{Floating link|Administrator instructions|Administrator instructions}} | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT THIS PAGE. The formatting is enforced by Cyberbot. To make changes, please contact Cyberpower678. --> | |||
<!-- Put interwikis at the WikiData entry and categories in /Header instead of this page --> | |||
⚫ | |||
<!-- Please copy the following example code to add a new entry at the bottom of the correct subpage: | |||
⚫ | == Current requests for increase in protection level == | ||
=== ] === | |||
⚫ | {{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/ |
||
* {{pagelinks|Example}} ~~~~ | |||
==== {{la|Crystal Palace F.C.}} ==== | |||
--> | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif">] ]</i> 18:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
==== {{la|Tim Sherwood}} ==== | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif">] ]</i> 17:48, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
==== {{la|Theo James}} ==== | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has picked right back up after the recent protection ended a few days ago. Needs a little big longer protection this time, it seems. ''']]'''</span> 17:27, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
: {{rfpp|s|3 months}}--] (]) 17:38, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | == Current ] in protection level == | ||
==== {{la|Weekend Today}} ==== | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button protect}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Increase}} | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi protection due to vandalism, users replacing executive producers with ] and ]. Thank you. — ''']''' (]) 17:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE --> | |||
: {{rfpp|s|1 week}}--] (]) 17:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | == Current ] in protection level == | ||
==== {{la|Nidhi Razdan}} ==== | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button unprotect}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Decrease}} | |||
'''Temporary full protection:''' Content dispute/edit warring. ] (]) 12:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE --> | |||
: {{rfpp|b}}--] (]) 13:23, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | == Current ] to a protected page == | ||
==== {{la|List of Turkic dynasties and countries}} ==== | |||
⚫ | {{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button edit}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Edit}} | ||
'''Semi-protection and/or pending changes protection''' - the article is just one giant edit war. Though a goodly amount of the edit warring come from auto-confirmed editors, many of the disruptive edits are from IPs.--] (] | <small>]</small>) 05:35, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE --> | |||
== Handled requests == | |||
⚫ | ''A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at ].'' | ||
'''Indefinite pending changes:''' Persistent vandalism – Page is an obvious target and it has a long history of disruptive editing. ] (]) 04:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:{{RFPP|s}}. PC looks like it would be an utter waste of time here. ] 19:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
==== {{lt|AC/DC}} ==== | |||
'''Temporary full protection:''' Content dispute/edit warring. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 03:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:{{RFPP|d}} It may be a little too early for protection right now as there have not been that many reverts. I'd recommend encouraging a talk page discussion. If it keeps up, then we can consider protection. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> ] • ]</span> 17:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
==== {{lut|DoRD}} ==== | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent sockpuppetry – Harassment from IP hopper | |||
. ] <sup>]</sup> 01:58, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:{{RFPP|b}} I made a small rangeblock. That might need to be upgraded if this guy has access to a larger range. ] | ] 02:04, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:{{RFPP|s|1 week}}<small>] | ] | ]</small> 02:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
*'''Automated comment:''' Page has not been protected.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 06:21, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
==== {{la|This Is How We Do}} ==== | |||
'''Semi-protection:''' Ongoing unsourced/poorly sourced changes. ] (] / ])</b> 00:17, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
==== {{la|List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films}} ==== | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – After full protection was lifted, continued addition of previously disputed material (which has since reached a consensus that it should NOT be included on this page for the time being). ] (]) 21:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
==== Example Articles with same criteria ==== | |||
* {{la|List of horror films of 2013}} | |||
* {{la|List of horror films of 2014}} | |||
* {{la|List of thriller films of the 2010s}} | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' High level of IP vandalism. Films are added from IP hopping user who adds content that does not match what is in the article, (lacking year, release date, genre, actors, country of production, etc.) or are flat out wrong. No response from IP when I've left notices on their page. Editing like this has gone on for about two months now. Help? ] (]) 19:21, 13 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
==== {{la|Peterson Institute for International Economics}} ==== | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' IPs from Denmark want to add their own personal analysis about a "policy briefing" paper from PIIE which is critical of Denmark. They have no sources for their criticism. Efforts to get them to RS & V their analysis have been unsuccessful. – ] (]) 14:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC) Update: Another registered WP editor has reverted their changes but the IPs persist in adding their unsourced personal opinions. My hope is that PP can solve the problem rather than going to the ANI or EWN.18:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
==== {{la|Kumhar}} ==== | |||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – Several I.P.s are active on the page and practising disruptive editing. <span style="border:1px solid #63B8FF; font-weight:bold; color:#23238E; background-color:#D0E7FF;"> ] <sub> ] <I>"Thanx n Regards"</I></sub> </span> 12:56, 13 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
: {{rfpp|nea}}--] (]) 14:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | == Current requests for reduction in protection level == | ||
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/URheading}} | |||
==== {{lut|WayKurat}} ==== | |||
'''Indefinite semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – Recurring target of vandals and sockpuppeteers whom he crosses paths with. ] (]) 14:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
*'''Automated comment:''' This page appears to already be protected. Please confirm.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 14:54, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:{{RFPP|d}} Just a note, this section is for unprotection but it appears you are requesting protection. I've blocked the user involved, so that should stop the vandalism. Also, the account was autoconfirmed so semi-protection would have no effect. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> ] • ]</span> 17:11, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
==== {{la|Kirby Delauter}} ==== | |||
Would an admin unprotect ] and move ] to ]? See of ] by {{user|Spartaz}} (thank you, Spartaz, for reviewing and closing the discussion): <blockquote>This discussion has stalled. As far as I can see there may be disagreement here about whether the article should hae been deleted but there isn't a killer policy based argument that the delete aspect of the DRV as closed was wrong. Where I am seeing a lack of consensus is around whether the salting should have been reinstated. As the salting was part of the original deletion is is certainly in RoySmith's ambit to reinstate this with the endorse finding but, on challenge, we do not have a clear specific consensus. As such, and bearing in mind that DRVs remit is deletion not salting I think the consensus is that reinstating the salting is not an enforcable provision of the DRV close. What does that mean? It means that any admin can unsalt this without needing to see consensus on the point. The only reason I have not done this myself is because there appears to be a risk of BLP issues to consider and I have not got the time right now to research the question to determine if there is a BLP risk from the unsalting. This does not preclude someone who has got that time from doing so.</blockquote> ] (]) 00:24, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:{{RFPP|nu}} This should be taken back to DRV; I am not going to override an endorse close there by my own action. ] 19:06, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | == Current requests for edits to a protected page == | ||
{{See|Misplaced Pages:Edit requests}} | |||
<noinclude>{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/SRheading}}</noinclude> | |||
== Fulfilled/denied requests == | |||
⚫ | ''A |
||
] |
Latest revision as of 20:25, 22 January 2025
Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages "WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.Noticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles, content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Shortcuts
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit |
Archives |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection ShortcutsPlace requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
List of Good Luck Charlie episodes
Reason: Edit warring. But no time for this, DisneyEditor1 did this also. 2605:59C0:204E:FB10:DC08:9C1F:E2D0:2CFC (talk) 00:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Nosferatu (2024 film)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP users. CricketXP (talk) 00:59, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Nicktoons
Reason: Requesting permanent semi-protection due to high level of IP vandalism. MimirIsSmart (talk) 01:01, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Marc Elias
Reason: High levels of vandalism. Marc Elias is a progressive voting rights and elections attorney. This page is intentionally being targeted by people who oppose his politics. They are misleading readers regarding Donald Trump's 2020 election loss to Joe Biden and spreading disinformation about Trump associates’ connections to Russian officials and interests. This page needs to be fact checked by serious fact checkers and protected from vandals. 2600:8805:250C:3200:BD90:3AAA:4171:CA5C (talk) 01:26, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 04:39, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Miss Tennessee
Reason: Too much incorrect information from individuals who know nothing about Miss Tennessee and who intend to turn attention away from the candidates and tarnish the legacy of the Miss Tennessee/Miss America organizations. 2601:483:4584:CB20:296A:DDD2:9FFA:CCCA (talk) 01:27, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Marc Elias
Reason: High levels of vandalism and false information. The 2016 Trump campaign was linked to Russian officials: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/connections-trump-putin-russia-ties-chart-flynn-page-manafort-sessions-214868/. Attempts to add context were reverted by other user(s). Marc Elias has many followers on social media, and this page could be used to intentionally spread falsehoods. पर्वत चोटी (talk) 02:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Nuri Şahin
Reason: High level of IP vandalism/edit warring by IPs from Malaysia and Turkey since end of December. Despite heroic efforts by an editor to revert these, there were so many bad IP edits that the article still has subtle remnants. Edit warring/vandalism done by at least 3 different IPs from 2 countries so can't just block a single one unfortunately. AncientWalrus (talk) 03:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Ballet dancer
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP socks. TornadoLGS (talk) 04:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Gulf of Mexico
Indefinite full move protection: Full-move protection should be restored after ECP for both move and edit was added. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 04:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—Talk to my owner:Online 04:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Mau Mau rebellion
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A IP changing user thinks this event led to Kenya's independence. It did not. soetermans. 04:59, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection ShortcutsBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
ShortcutsJoe Biden
Indefinite semi-protection: No longer necessary. This article should be reduced to semi-protection per consistency with articles, such as Barack Obama and George W. Bush. Biden is also no longer the president so it makes sense to make this happen. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 04:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Have you discussed this with the protecting admin on their talk page as it says above? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:23, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Request a specific edit to a protected pagePlease request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit Shortcut
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Israel–Hamas war
Currently, the lede states "On 7 October 2023, Hamas-led militant groups launched a surprise attack on Israel, taking 251 captive, against which Israelis responded applying the controversial Hannibal Directive, resulting in the death of 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals, among which 815 civilians.". This implies that the majority of the casualties were caused by Israel applying the Hannibal Directive, and despite some cases of casualties due to this, no credible source has made the claim that the majority of casualties originate from it. I suggest changing the lede back to what it was before it was randomly edited to the current lede without any discussion on the talk page about it, to "On 7 October 2023, Hamas-led militant groups launched a surprise attack on Israel, killing 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals and taking 251 captive." Aradkipod (talk) 12:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Israel–Hamas war
In the section labeled "Initial Israeli counter-operation (October 2023)" it states the following: "A July 2024 Haaretz investigation revealed that the IDF ordered the Hannibal Directive to be used, killing many Israeli civilians and soldiers. An ABC News (Australia) investigation reported that at least 13 civilians were killed in a 'Hannibal' incident in Beeri."
These sentences are incorrect and not supported by the sourced references. First off, the word "many" in the first sentence is gratuitous, misleading, and, perhaps most importantly, not supported by the Haaretz article it references, which never concludes that any citizens were killed as a direct result of a so-called "Hannibal" directive. Nowhere in the article does it state that the Hannibal directive can be tied to *any* deaths, let alone "many" deaths. Any reference in the article to potential deaths caused by a Hannibal directive are stated as questions, or that investigations are forthcoming. (e.g., "Haaretz does not know whether or how many civilians and soldiers were hit due to these procedures, but the cumulative data indicates that many of the kidnapped people were at risk, exposed to Israeli gunfire, even if they were not the target.") Either way, it certainly does not conclude that "many" deaths were tied to the use of the "Hannibal directive" which is highly misleading.
Similarly, as to the second sentence, the ABC News (Australia) does not conclude that " at least 13 civilians were killed in a 'Hannibal' incident in Beeri". It discusses a tank shooting at a house in Kibbutz Berri , but never states that there is evidence that the IDF tank fire resulted in the death of 13 civilians -- as opposed to the 40 Hamas gunmen who were holding them captive and engaged in a "firefight" with the IDF at the time of the tank fire. The 40 Hamas gunmen could just as easily have killed them as opposed to tank fire. Indeed, an eyewitness stated "Mr Shifroni's aunt Ayala and her grand-niece Liel and grand-nephew Yanai were all killed at Pessi's house — he believes by terrorists", not by the IDF and ""There are a few others that we still don't know and we may never know what exactly killed them." Later on in the article, it states "The team determined that most of the hostages were likely murdered by the terrorists, and further inquiries and reviews of additional findings are necessary.".
I propose that the sentences be re-worded as follows: "A July 2024 Haaretz investigation revealed that the IDF ordered the Hannibal Directive to be used at three locations, putting the lives of some Israeli civilians being held by Hamas at those locations at risk.. An ABC News (Australia) investigation reported that after a prolonged firefight in Kibbutz Be'eri with around 40 Hamas gunmen who had been holding 15 hostages inside and outside, 13 of the hostages may have been killed by either the Hamas captors or IDF tank fire."
Apndrew (talk) 05:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Israel–Hamas war
Since I cannot reply to my original request on this, I am starting a new request with a different source for the request and a revised sentence:
In the fourth paragraph of the entry, it states."A case accusing Israel of committing genocide is being reviewed by the International Court of Justice,...."
This should be changed to "Cases accusing both Israel and Hamas of committing genocide have been lodged with or are being reviewed by the International Court of Justice,..."
This change is supported by multiple references: https://www.timesofisrael.com/9-bereaved-israeli-families-bring-icc-war-crime-genocide-complaint-against-hamas/ "The families of nine Israeli victims of the October 7 Hamas massacre have lodged a complaint at the International Criminal Court (ICC) for suspected war crimes."
and
The change is necessary for accuracy, balance, and neutral point of view.
Apndrew (talk) 06:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Mount Denali
Change Denali to McKinley https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/restoring-names-that-honor-american-greatness/ Fyndoro (talk) 23:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: An EO doesn't override the MOS. As they've said on the talk page four times already. Sumanuil. (talk to me)
- Declined. I think you mean Denali. You are autoconfirmed. Make an edit request on the article talk page. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:32, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Archive.