| Revision as of 11:17, 28 February 2015 editBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,402 editsm →Talkpage access restored: yeah, I very much like to see a good contributor gagged, suuuure. Brilliant.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:12, 17 December 2024 edit undoEaldgyth (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators153,207 edits Happy Holidays! | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{{{#ifeq:|tmbox|tmbox|mbox}} | |||
| {{bots|optout=ifd, nolicense}} | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = ''']'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|{{BASEPAGENAME}}}} has not edited Misplaced Pages '''{{#if:31 August 2022|since 31 August 2022|for a considerable amount of time}}'''. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach his aunt, ], who is still an occasional editor. | |||
| }}{{#if:||]]}} | |||
| == File:Bramham Park.gif listed for discussion == | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 23:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Always precious == | |||
| Old messages are at: | |||
| ] | |||
| *] (From Oct 2004) | |||
| Ten years ago, ] were found precious. That's what you are, always. --] (]) 13:23, 25 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2005) | |||
| *] (From July 2005) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2006) | |||
| *] (From July 2006) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2007) | |||
| *] (From July 2007) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2008) | |||
| *] (From July 2008) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2009) | |||
| *] (From July 2009) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2010) | |||
| *] (From July 2010) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2011) | |||
| *] (From July 2011) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2012) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2013) | |||
| *] (From July 2013) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2014) | |||
| *] (From July 2014) | |||
| *] (From January 2015) | |||
| == Belton House == | |||
| This article is under FAR. You can place comments here; ] ] (]) 22:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| === Featured Article Save Award for ] === | |||
| {{User Wikipedian For|year=2004|month=11|day=8}} | |||
| There is a ] nomination at ]. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. ] (]) 16:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Mail call== | |||
| ] | |||
| You have mail (finally). ] | ] 09:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC). | |||
| {{nobots}} | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| ==]== | |||
| This talk page has remained protected since May 2011, when you were involved in the discussion. Since that month there has been only one edit. Is there a reason that it should remain protected? ] (]) 22:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :I think you may be confusing Giano with another editor, and in any case, Giano has not edited since last August. I have unprotected that talk page. ] (]) 22:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == FAR for Matthew Brettingham == | |||
| =='''Please leave your message below:'''== | |||
| I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 20:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Gender Gap on Misplaced Pages== | |||
| ==Season's Greetings== | |||
| It's my belief that the above subject is silly and blown out of all proportion. Why? I have no idea, but it's a big fire that is being stoked by a few editors who's agenda one can only speculate upon. I've stayed out of it until recently, but it now seems, that if a female editor takes against a male editor (for reason's best to known unto herself) she needs to receive special treatment and the Arbcom support this view. I don't agree with that. I believe that, in the civilized Western World - where most of us edit, women are equal to men, but I also believe that men are equal to women. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 19:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FFF7E6;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Season's Greetings''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! The Nativity scene on the ] by ] is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. ] (]) 02:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==Quickie drive by== | |||
| Dropping in to say hello! I fell in love with your hummingbird, and cloned it for my user page. Hope that's ok? {{P|smile}} <font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">]</font><font color="gold">☯</font>] 17:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::You're welcome ], but he's actually a very rare and endangered Italian Freedom Bird, and his name is Spumoni. Like many male birds, he's far more colorful than his mate. The species is known for it's fearless and protective nature, but beware when he or any of his feathered friends are attacked, he has a very nasty peck. By sharing, you are making the species less endangered. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 17:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::Would it help if I told you I was Italian? Mamma is 100% - grandparents didn't speak English. Can I please keep it? <font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">]</font><font color="gold">☯</font>] 17:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yes, but you must take great care of him, and take full responsibility if he attacks any visiting idiots to your page. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 17:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I promise I will, and I will make sure he isn't overworked which is why I added him to my user page and not my talk page. It's all I can do to keep visiting idiots out of my life, never mind my page. <font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">]</font><font color="gold">☯</font>] 17:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Hello {{u|Giano}}, | |||
| == ] == | |||
| As one of the original parties to the "Durova" arbitration case, you may be interested in the current ]. A motion has been proposed to modify principle 2 by removing copyright-related wording from it. | |||
| This building that was an influence on '']'' with Grade II listed entrance gates has had an "unfortunate" history of copyvios and revdels and is now sitting as a lonely stub. It could do with some TLC from a few willing volunteers. Are you in? ] ] ] 19:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, I think I can do that one, and use Pevsner. However, I can't do all that complicated referencing the article uses - far too stressful. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 20:35, 19 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::I can loan you a pentagram and some candles if you'd like? ] ] ] 21:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Just so long as I'm not required to write anything about golf courses. As a game, I don't dislike golf - I play it myself (sort of), but I do dislike the people who tend to inhabit golf clubs. The men are usually badly dressed, pompous oiks full of pretentious bonhomie and the women even worse - far worse - usually suffering from a complete charm by-pass. Golf clubs seem to bring out the worst in people. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 13:08, 20 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Don't get me started. I have spent years as a gigging musician playing functions in golf clubs, the most notorious being one where you cannot get the gear from outside onto the stage without lugging the whole lot up a fire escape. In fact, ] was taken at the bottom of said fire escape after I thought I was buggered if I was going to lug that up a flight of stairs ''again''. ] ] ] 15:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::I can imagine golfing people all jigging about to music - all those thin faced women with big mouths and teeth and bobbed peroxided hair dancing with their braying menfolk with badly cut hair hair and protruding stomachs. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 15:40, 20 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::There is a photo of me somewhere on the internet after playing piano for a society church service where, due to a tragic miscalculation of dress sense and a lack of sunglasses, I look unchangingly like a Conservative MP. ] ] ] 15:52, 20 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::: If you'd like me to check over the references after you've finished updating, I'd be more than happy to do that and I'll ensure that they fit with the current style used. Just ping me. Cheers --] (]) 15:32, 20 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::That might be a very good idea. At the moment, I'm still researching it - quite fascinating. I'll ping you when I'm done. Thanks | |||
| ::::::::::The article is in good hands now - excellent. ] ] ] 15:52, 20 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::I think ] without more info, I've done about all I can there - over to you. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 16:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::Hi Giano, I've started to add information about the house in the Estates section, but I've only included a description of the western facade, the extensions to the left and the tower to the right. The remaining Gothicy sides ought to be described, but I'm a bit out of my depth on that part, especially as I've never seen it and don't have a copy of Pevsner to hand. It would also be nice if there was a quote by him to summarise the architecture - the house is quite a jigsaw, and I'm not sure all the pieces fit together :) Anyway, many thanks, (]) 23:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC). | |||
| :::::::::::::::—]I thought I'd already described the architecture, some of it's now in the history section. It's not so much a jigsaw - as poor architecture. One has to be careful of being too POV even Pevsner's (which is actually Verey and Brooks') and confine oneself to the occasional "heavy", "incongruous" and "loose form of Grecian/Gothic/Tudor" and hope people get the message. There's no point giving to detailed a descriprion, but I'll expand a little later today. We've got to be careful not to rush too fast at this, if you look at this picture that small, single story section sandwiched between the main house and the colonnade is probably real, genuine 17th century Palladianism. Not quite ], but not far off, and streets above the architecture elsewhere. If I'm correct, that rather disputes the former house as being gabled Tudoresque. More research I think, but we are running out of resources. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 08:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::::::::As far as I can see, that part of the house is not mentioned in Pevsner, nor in Kingsley. The English Heritage listing explicitly states it's 19th century. Kingsley says the following: "''In 1595 the park was sold off by the Tracys, and in the next few years a house was built there that later acquired the name Well House. This was a small gabled building, which by 1718 apparently possessed a hall and kitchen on the ground floor and three chambers above'''". He mentions no further changes until the alterations made by the younger Robert Bush c. 1800. At the end of the day, if the sources don't exist, we can't say otherwise; plus, if it were a worthy example of Palladianism, it is surprising that the Pevsner authors make no mention of it. (It might be that it was part of the alterations made by Bush, but that's pure conjecture on my part). With that in mind, I think much of the architectural description is well on its way to be complete, and the history section too seems to be getting there nicely. We still need sources for the freemasonry part, though. Anyway, many thanks, —] (]) 19:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC). | |||
| ::Oh there' no hurry, you'd be surprised what turns up eventually - which part of the Freemasonry part are you unhappy with? At the end of the day, a Freemasonry symbol is just that, and if added by the country's leading Freemason to his own home can probably be taken as a safe assumption of Freemasonry. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 21:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{od}} | |||
| I've done a first pass over the refs - there wasn't much to do as they were already quite tidy. The only problem is I can't find the book referred to as "Verey and Brooks 1980, p. 808" - the current reference number 9. Is that an earlier edition of the 2002 book? Cheers --] (]) 16:49, 23 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::I've altered this ref - it is the 2002 edition. Cheers, —] (]) 17:36, 23 February 2015 (UTC). | |||
| :::Thanks ], you're right, sorry, I am indeed using the 2002 edition I was looking at the page listing all the editions and it looked like 1980 was the final edition. The 2002 is ISBN 0 300 09733 6. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 22:55, 27 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Best regards,<br>] (]) 04:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == February 2015 == | |||
| ] This is your '''only warning'''; if you make ] on other people again, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.<!-- Template:uw-npa4im --> <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 21:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Just curious...are you going to warn RO for targeting another user on your talk, Coffee? Civil hit requests are still hit requests, after all. ]] 21:42, 27 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::RO did not attack that user, they simply said that I should pay attention to their edits. As I have RO's edits on constant refresh, I'd say I'm fairly on top of whether she is or is not violating our policies here. Currently, she is not. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 21:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::: (ec)Thanks. You might also want to consider paying attention to the conduct that leads up to those suggestions. Not criticizing; just pointing out that it is possible to conduct those campaigns without cursing or open attacks. ]] 21:51, 27 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Ah coffee, you may be able to help: I remember once when I was a boy at school, clandestinely watching a totally shocking film where nuns masturbated while a handsome priest was burnt at the stake. I doubt Eric is very handsome, but tonight I am minded of that film. can anyone remember its name - I think it may have had Jeanne Moreau in it? <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 21:50, 27 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration motion regarding Durova == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''2 days''' for attempting to ] other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by emailing an administrator or ArbCom. However, you should read the ] first. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 00:33, 28 February 2015 (UTC)</div>{{z8}}<!-- Template:uw-hblock --> | |||
| :Enough is enough. I warned you at my talk page and here that making attacks at other editors through your comments would not be allowed, and you decided to cross the line again at Eric's talk page. You're acting ridiculous, and you've now earned a block. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 22:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::You do seem to be rather an impetuous person Coffee; I expect you'll grow out of it. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 22:17, 27 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::PS: can we just have the example (diff) of this dreadful transgression. Purely for the amusement of our more sane editors. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 22:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::*Oh well! Coffee is obviously too ashamed to post the diff, so I will and I stand by every word of it. What a fucked up place this now is, when posting the truth earns a block. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 23:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has resolved by ] that: | |||
| Did blocking Giano bring bonus brownie points from Jimbo or something Coffee? You seem rather trigger happy with your blocking tools.♦ ] 09:58, 28 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{ivmbox|Principle 2 of ], ''Private correspondence'', is changed from<br>{{tqq|2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence) <s>or their lapse into public domain</s>, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. <s>See Misplaced Pages:Copyrights.</s>}}<br>to<br>{{tqq|2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki.}}}} | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, | |||
| ] ] 23:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motion regarding Durova}}''' | |||
| *An intelligent person would leave that disgraceful episode in Misplaced Pages’s ancient history firmly buried in the past. The posting of that far from private email wasn’t the disgrace. The disgrace was why it was necessary to post it. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == |
== FAR notice == | ||
| I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 12:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Although you have the right to comment on anything you wish, might I make a friendly recommendation that you (and Eric, should he see this), ignore all the mess (by taking all the drama breeding grounds off your watchlists, for instance; ] might be helpful) and do much ] ] ]? I will not comment on what my personal opinion on "the mess" is, as it would be very foolish to get myself involved, but I will say that I think it's a shame that Misplaced Pages's good content contributors are getting themselves blocked over things that are not worth the trouble when you really think about it. Of course, as I said, if you feel that doing so would essentially be allowing others to keep you from saying what you really think, I'll say no more. --]] 23:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Capone'scastle.jpg listed for discussion == | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 18:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Io Saturnalia!== | |||
| I'm afraid that writing content does not preclude me from having or voicing opinions. It just means I have less time to play silly buggers with fools. Sorry, don't seem to be able to sifn with this phone thingn but c'est moi. | |||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FF0000;" | |||
| ==Talkpage access restored== | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| I'm not the right admin to meddle with the block; I don't like it, especially not the extension for complaining about it in the first place; but that's neither here nor there. ''But'' I very much dislike to see a good contributor gagged by having talkpage access removed, especially on such flimsy grounds. It's normal, indeed expected and allowed, to be upset and rude under a block. Only in egregious cases should a block be extended for it, and only in ''extreme'' cases should tpa be removed. I'm restoring it. | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Io, ]!''' | |||
| ], I see you recently returned to editing after a four-month break. Might you be a little out of touch? Not that the norms have changed in that space of time, but they may have become fuzzy to you. Whether or not, it was a poor idea to ''un''block ] and block ], two users in long-term conflict as everybody knows, within five minutes of each other. And then you went on to block Giano, who had been vocally taking part in the very same conflict. Having already unblocked RO and blocked Eric, you should ''really'' have left it to somebody else to deal with Giano. You have acted like a cowboy admin. | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. ] (]) 15:11, 17 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I note especially the idiosyncratic way you did the unblock of RO. You're supposed to confer with the blocking admin before unblocking. When ] told you that on your page, you responded "I just moved forward in the same motion that I'm used to when I made this judgment". Does that mean you're used to ignoring policy and common practice on this point? And intend to continue doing it that way? ("Except in cases of unambiguous error or significant change in circumstances dealing with the reason for blocking, administrators should avoid unblocking users without first attempting to contact the blocking administrator to discuss the matter".) | |||
| |} | |||
| I'm not saying I object to the unblock of RO as such, as long as she is held to the promises she has made. (Her volte-face in such a short time might be a little incredible, after all the warnings and the advice she had been given, which hadn't made a dent in her attitude. But let's hope.) | |||
| Just in case the ] is unclear to you, I should probably warn you that you'd be violating it if you were to re-remove Giano's talkpage access now that I've restored it. ] | ] 11:10, 28 February 2015 (UTC). | |||
Latest revision as of 15:12, 17 December 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Giano has not edited Misplaced Pages since 31 August 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach his aunt, The Lady Catherine de Burgh, who is still an occasional editor. |
File:Bramham Park.gif listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bramham Park.gif, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:23, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Belton House
This article is under FAR. You can place comments here; Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Belton House/archive1 Desertarun (talk) 22:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Featured Article Save Award for Belton House
There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article review/Belton House/archive1. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Mail call
You have mail (finally). Bishonen | tålk 09:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC).
Talk:Duke of San Donato
This talk page has remained protected since May 2011, when you were involved in the discussion. Since that month there has been only one edit. Is there a reason that it should remain protected? 67.180.143.89 (talk) 22:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- I think you may be confusing Giano with another editor, and in any case, Giano has not edited since last August. I have unprotected that talk page. Cullen328 (talk) 22:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
FAR for Matthew Brettingham
I have nominated Matthew Brettingham for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 20:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
|
Season's Greetings | |
| Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! The Nativity scene on the Pulpit in the Pisa Baptistery by Nicola Pisano is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 02:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) |
Amendment request: Durova
Hello Giano,
As one of the original parties to the "Durova" arbitration case, you may be interested in the current amendment request about the Durova case. A motion has been proposed to modify principle 2 by removing copyright-related wording from it.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding Durova
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Principle 2 of Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Durova, Private correspondence, is changed from2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence)
or their lapse into public domain, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. See Misplaced Pages:Copyrights.
to2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki.
For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 23:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Durova
- An intelligent person would leave that disgraceful episode in Misplaced Pages’s ancient history firmly buried in the past. The posting of that far from private email wasn’t the disgrace. The disgrace was why it was necessary to post it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.29.238.45 (talk) 19:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
FAR notice
I have nominated Palace of Queluz for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Capone'scastle.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Capone'scastle.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Io Saturnalia!
.jpg)
|
Io, Saturnalia! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:11, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |